How Powerful was The Pope in Medieval Times?

How Powerful was the Pope in Medieval Times?
♦Consider to Support the Channel of Patreon and gain cool stuff:
/ knowledgia
♦Please consider to SUBSCRIBE : goo.gl/YJNqek
♦Music Used :
Kevin MacLeod - Impact Allegretto
Kevin MacLeod - Drums of the Deep
• [NO COPYRIGHT MUSIC] A...
• Video
• Video
#History #Pope

[@nikelaos5792]

"How many divisions Pope have?"

[@Knowledgia]

S T A L I N

[@nikelaos5792]

@@Knowledgia Yes, Josif Wissarionovich 😉

[@herodotus945]

1,3 billion people.

[@xtusvincit5230]

@@herodotus945 But, in the end, the Pope without divisions brought down the Soviet Union.

[@o_o5813]

@@Knowledgia Which period of time was the papacy most powerful?

[@st.michaelsknight6299]

Great video, one small mistake I want to point out. The great schism had nothing to do with the crusades and was already cemented for a while by 1099. It had to do with the addition of filioque to the creed and IMO a power struggle between the Eastern apostolic sees and Rome.

[@wtripley]

Didn’t the Emperor offer to recognize Papal supremacy (thus preventing the schism) in exchange for soldiers with which the Emperor could retake Anatolia? The Pope called a crusade instead and the Emperor never recognized the primacy of the Bishop of Rome, but they’re related, no?

[@st.michaelsknight6299]

@@wtripley I think your thinking of Emperor Alexios as I am pretty sure the battle of manzikert was after the schism

[@eiji7056]

Fax

[@user-je5ib5nv8u]

@@wtripley i think you are talking about the council of florence. It was a last ditch effort to unite the east and west as constantinople will sonn fall to turks. Crusades from latins were called to help the east but none succeeded.

[@bosbanon3452]

Remind me for my medieval 2 gaming as holy roman empire and the pope gave me some task

[@yuribrito1504]

At its height, the Pontifical States militarily controlled all the current Italian regions of Lazio ( with exception of some territories in the current province of Rieti); Umbria; Marche ( provinces of Macerata; Ancona; Pesaro-Urbino and Ascoli Piceno); parts of Romagna and parts of Emilia. In Romagna ( which comprised the central and eastern parts of present-day Emilia-Romagna), the Pope controlled all the current provinces of Rimini; Ferrara; Forlì-Cesena and Ravenna. In Emilia ( which comprised the western part of the present-day region of Emilia-Romagna, including the current provinces Piacenza; Parma; Reggio Emilia; Modena and parts of Bologna), on the other hand, the Pope controlled only a tiny part of it. Nevertheless, Rome was considered the spiritual center of the world, the eternal city ( AETERNA), the "queen of Italy" ( REGINA ITALIAE) and the "capital of the world" ( CAPVT MVNDI). The Pope had, therefore, the spiritual and the cultural hegemony of the Christian world ( but not a military or a territorial hegemony).

[@historycenter4011]

I could read this OR I could watch the video. I'll watch the video.

[@yuribrito1504]

@@historycenter4011 As you wish.

[@sherly7870]

We want a United Church...

[@johnlewis3891]

The Pope was also feudal overlord of Naples, Sicily, and the numerous prince-bishops, prince abbots, and princess abbesses throughout Europe.

[@thirdypitero2977]

Kudos to this channel. It has very much improved since i first subscribed, last year. They have more in depth research, use of examples, a much clearer voice actor, and it is in general, more informative. Good job you guys!

[@pg3384]

Was the pope a powerful entity? *Well yes but actually no*

[@Matrix_985]

1:58 Damn that got me...

[@Madelune7]

Ik I just watched this in class and it scared me so bad. I’m watching the vid again because we have a quiz on it and people were talking 😒

[@robertharley6650]

Wow, you really stepped it up with the production quality kudos.

[@anintellectual5068]

If Pope in Latin mean Papa does that mean that Papa Stalin is Pope Stalin?

[@aimanmarzuqi4804]

Truly an intellectual inquiry good Sir 🧐

[@instantinople3796]

Hahahaha

[@StevenEveral]

In Latin, yes.

[@xtusvincit5230]

Pope means Father as in the title, Holy Father.

[@svenrio8521]

Does he love it when people call him big Papa?

[@josephpeed2002]

Great video!

[@DaviGomes-mh2ho]

Woow! What an amazing video! Congratulations from Brazil! 🇧🇷

[@grantrobinson5046]

Good video, however the schism of 1054 was due to ongoing disagreements over the veneration of icons. The crusades were not the instigator of the split as the fist crusade was called for in 1096, over 40 years later

[@johnlewis3891]

The schism of 1054 had nothing to due with icon worship. That dispute had long ended at that point. "A succession of ecclesiastical differences and theological disputes between the Greek East and Latin West pre-dated the formal split that occurred in 1054.[1][2][3] Prominent among these were the issues of the procession of the Holy Spirit, whether leavened or unleavened bread should be used in the Eucharist,[a] the Bishop of Rome's claim to universal jurisdiction, and the place of the See of Constantinople in relation to the pentarchy." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East%E2%80%93West_Schism#Differences_underlying_the_schism

[@dominicksebastien2254]

@@johnlewis3891 True, but even beneath tthaz there was undercurrent - the differences in language (latin vs greek) the fact that the Pope was turning away from Byzantine empire and turned towards the Franks was maybe even more important because in the old Empire political unity and religious unity went hand in hand. In the 8th century political unity was in shambles and what followed was disintegration of religious unity. Suddenly, everyone started to look what was different, wgat was before a minor difference became a major one etc.

[@nonyobussiness3440]

Honestly they geographically and socially and culturally were too far away. It took too long to communicate and no one is going to pay taxes and listen to a city that can’t quickly raise a military threat nor has a real impact on trade.

[@oso3033]

Yes the split already happened, but the crusades killed a lot of orthodox christians and so naturally the split got even bigger. Hence why the orthodox christians preferred the muslim Ottomans over the christian Europeans.

[@NihilSineRex1881]

I can't wait for the "History of Romania" video!

[@GeorgeMunte]

Ba

[@GeorgeMunte]

Ăsta e roman , e unul dintre cei de la lumea lui dedo( caută pe KZbin

[@NihilSineRex1881]

@@GeorgeMunte Stiu deja.

[@sherly7870]

We want a United Church...

[@grantrobinson5046]

Nobody wants to hear about Romania

[@mrpancakes8903]

Great videos I really enjoyed it and learned a lot.

[@donnydonadio1185]

Good video!

[@morepower1415]

The Pope back then was actually Thanos and his Infinity Stones is Europe

[@shaheenakhter9975]

So, Muslims were the Avengers.

[@nomananjum9574]

@@shaheenakhter9975 but this time avengers were defeated badly by thanos for eternity😉

[@shaheenakhter9975]

@@nomananjum9574 Thanos was at end " gone, reduced to atoms".

[@nomananjum9574]

@@shaheenakhter9975 but Pope is not gone but the other ones are not in a powerful state in Europe Pope is still very strong in the whole world

[@nomananjum9574]

@@shaheenakhter9975 come of out of fiction and see the reality

[@thearabianromanian4401]

Well made

[@princepshadrianvs8542]

All hail the Church

[@niclasschur3348]

Deus volt

[@NoOne-og6he]

Hail!!

[@tishireimiriam4056]

Мне определенно нравится работа людей этого канала. Мне нравиться что они задают вопросы,для меня неподдельное интересные,то что они не торопяться рассказывая,понятный и интересный для изучения инглиш. Тот из не многих каналов который хочеться поддержать без напоминаний

[@joecho1427]

What a good contents.

[@TheGeneralGrievous19]

Important thing to remeber is that we must talk about distinction between power and authority. The first is excerised by force second by respect. In Catholic theology angels have hierarchy based on authority and demons on power. Similarly secular states excerised their rule by force most of time (though authority also was present). Role of the Papacy and Church in general was based solely on authority (not including secular possesions of the Church's officials like Papal States). It lead to basic notion that there are moral laws transcending will of the ruler (namely Natural Law and Divine Law) that should govern kingdoms and the kings should oblige to it. That is if a ruler rules unjustly he would be condemened and deposed by the Church (which was kind of a League of Nations in that regard, but independent of secular powers as spiritual authority and more succesful) and subjects does not have to oblige to him etc. It basicaly gave way to freedom we had/have in Western civilization compered to e.g. Islamic or Chinese collectivism as well as to the international law. I personally think the succes of Church's authority in the world, even to this day, is due to God's support.

[@philb7851]

How about Lamotta vs Graziano, De la Hoya vs. Leonard, Dempsey vs. Jack Johnson

[@DakkogiRauru23]

Just a correction: founded by *Jesus* with Peter as head and Paul as Apostle to the gentiles.

[@aymanmarpicati3686]

Does anyone know where does he find the base maps for his videos?

[@splitfries69]

Yes give me more popey videos

[@Samuel070793]

The pope was more powerful than you think.

[@lawmaker22]

Catholic Church is unique powerhouse... No army, led by some old guys and whole world is afraid of it... Every frickin president or king comes to Vatican to talk with Pope... Church is spiritual and thats why is more powerful than nation, territory states

[@elisabetta4478]

What this guy is saying is history. He's not inventing anything nor being speculative. I live in Rome and know this story of power by papa Re but not as you had meant above.

[@lawmaker22]

@@elisabetta4478 ok, i didnt say he is being wrong... Its 2000 years of lifetime, all kind of things happened.. Im just sayin from where Church power comes from...i actaully think today its more powerful than ever and thats miracle... Authority without any kind of violent force

[@juicyjfan]

@@lawmaker22 theres violence, they just do it behind the scenes.

[@lawmaker22]

@@juicyjfan oh really? And you are behind the scenes?and what is the scene? In 21 century you really think its possible to hide so much? There is bad stuff everywhere, in every institution, Church is not immune on evil, Church is not perfect and they dont claim they are... Show my any other institution in history of mankind that large that has no corruption and is more charitable than Church?

[@juicyjfan]

@@lawmaker22 I guess you missed the memo of the Catholic church apologizing for the Rwandan genocide. Countless sex abuse scandals etc. Look at Pope Francis tenure under the Junta in Argentina. The point is that the Catholic church has been corrupt from its very inception. The evils of the dark ages wouls be brought back today if they had the same power. A church based upon blasphemy will always be corrupt to the highest order.

[@heneraldodzz4978]

Can make a video about the Philippines history

[@o_o5813]

Which period of time was the papacy most powerful?

[@baoparty]

This was so hard to follow. The timelines were erratic and there was a lot of repetition that lead to different things. I was super interested in the topic but this video was more like a click bait for me. 😕 I wish it was told in a clearer way. Maybe in a different structure.

[@darksoul479]

You must know much more about this than I do? I think that was informative.

[@baoparty]

troy lenz I don’t know anything about this subject. That is why I wanted to learn. I just had a hard time following.

[@sherly7870]

We want a United Church...

[@kleversarmiento6240]

A epic catholic ortodox Church! 🇻🇦

[@eyeofthepyramid2596]

But we can't

[@OldAnimeLover]

"Innocent the third"

[@RicardoHernandez-sz2yp]

Thank for my class

[@person-ie1fe]

Was I the only one who saw "Ortodox"?

[@withered8022]

BTW he's actually Romanian origin (the creator of this video)

[@Samuel070793]

Don't forget the Inquisition!

[@javio4636]

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition

[@boknoyofficial4543]

Don't blame the Church but the monarchy

[@IkarusZmedieval]

Great Schism have nothing to do with arguments about crusades.

[@MichaelScott-jv3ek]

Pls history of DEDO

[@francisco4benites]

this is not true a pope was more powerful than a king a king had to ask for the pope to do things you are looking at it as a whole rather than king by king and this is why King Henry left cuz he wasn't allowed to do what he wanted witch means he did have to answer to what the Pope wanted only being able to leave the church or obey SMH duh

[@nomadiccheese4911]

This is pretty normal for ck2 veterans

[@Marvindlight]

Game of pope(s)

[@EsamforMEMES]

if stalin became bishop

[@whitneywoodward907]

The Pope: Pontifex Maximvs

[@dariobarboni9276]

I see you are a man of culture .

[@salvadorramirez4114]

Guess that's why napoleon ended up losing

[@MaWajtv]

Wow 😳

[@darksoul479]

That's what happens when religion gets too much power. Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.

[@miguelmontenegro3520]

*Ahen* Iran, are you there?

[@washizukanorico]

1054 ... arguments about the crusades .... laughed ... and stop watching!

[@violalohsen1755]

I know right? That seems like a pretty key thing to get wrong as far as timelines are concerned. The crusades occurred AFTER 1054... a bit of a silly mistake for a video about medieval Europe and the papacy to make!

[@CarlJancorda]

Wdym?

[@sunshineimperials1600]

It’s kinda like saying how much power does the President of the United States have in modern times; a LOT.

[@dannyboy5086]

Eh - klee - zee - as - ti - kuhl

[@elisabetta4478]

Già, il cosiddetto papa Re.

[@windwind3170]

>that time they dug up the corpse of a previous Pope and tried him him for his sins and excommunicated him AND cut his hands because he couldn't defend himself.

[@eklezia2829]

Here after started playing Assassin’s Creed Brotherhood again to understand the story deeply. Rodrigo Borgia liked the video : D

[@omarabdullahfuentes3725]

Ya stupid ac fanboy bitches never even read a goddamn book and only know history because of that stupid game

[@elisabetta4478]

it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potere_temporale I poteri dei papi nel medioevo

[@Emanon...]

"Keys to heaven" Yeah, someone should've called bullshit early on...

[@Real_SkyRipper]

no one would invade or conquer Rome because then they would get negative diplomatic reputation.

[@joenzzzieswd6321]

MadLane 1527

[@stayrospaparunas3062]

Church split at 1054 so what u say kiddos?

[@Samuel070793]

From 606 to 1648, the Dark Age!

[@darksoul479]

It was that long? Wow!

[@sjakierulez]

@@darksoul479 Well some people argue that it was maybe 100 years max and that the 4th crusade actually is the first

[@nomore9004]

Worng

[@Samuel070793]

@@nomore9004 Why?

[@albiceleste101]

You never answered the question, just gave general history about the papacy

[@pierfelicecutrufelli4613]

Actually Peter (Petrus in latin) means "The Rock". "The Rock" founded the Church!

[@miguelmontenegro3520]

Its a words game. Preety interesting. We know him as the rock that would support the founding of God's church. Sadly not many popes seen to have read the bible. More likely they read art of war 🤣

[@MartinMizner]

What's strange about rock?

[@SJ23982398]

The pope gained a lot of power when priests were no longer allowed to get married and have families. Having a family, especially a large one, creates a significant local power base. Just imagine running an organization, and some local chapter is ignoring you. Now you want to punish some of the ones that are doing this. This is much harder if they are connected to hundreds of people. Because by punishing them, you also anger those hundreds of people. And possibly other families that are connected through marriage. Just a single priest without family, much easier to influence, and much easier to create a steeper hierarchy. Same reason why you had eunuchs in China, and slave armies in the middle east (that were not allowed to have families). It is all about control.

[@st.michaelsknight6299]

Frankly this isnt really the case, as even pre enforcement of the rule, priestly celibacy was the norm as you couldnt be married and be a bishop. England was a bit of a odd case, but frankly England was basically a autocephalious church at the time in practice.

[@MartinMizner]

So if we will clone humans, we will create super global dictatorship?

[@SJ23982398]

@@MartinMizner Yeah, the more you separate people from their families (not only physically) the more influence the government can have. A separation of powers has so far been an antidote to dictatorship, despite the diminished role family plays in Western society.

[@jokester3076]

POPERY!

[@xAZ000]

Pope epic business

[@olginlest3498]

Could not get over the pronunciation of certain words like ecclesiastic and apostolic . Stopped before midway.

[@xtusvincit5230]

Yes, his pronunciation is abysmal. I could hardly listen myself. He had other errors, too.

[@oklevetanihrvati3698]

Week and evil do not like the competition in politics. This is why some was aiming to destroy Vatikan. Voltaire, Hitler, Musolini ect.

[@1MuchButteR1]

He caused problems for Great Lithuania... Algirdas could not finish siege of Moscow.

[@arthegor]

Laughs in Orthodox truth xD. Funny part that the Pope separated himself from the Other Holy Sees of Constantinople / Antioch and Alexandria and from the Pentarchy and changed the creed by adding the Filioque. Pope Leo III denied his approval and publicly posted the Creed in Rome without the Filioque, written in Greek and Latin on two silver plaques, in defense of the Orthodox Faith (810) stating his opposition to the addition of the Filioque into the Creed. He was Primus Inter Pares first among equals not the de facto ruler of the church only Christ is leader of the Church himself. How is he a vicar when clearly Christ himself sent the Holy Spirit in his place on Earth after his ascension to Haven? hehe there is a whole other controversy that I can argue in long paragraph about Peter supremacy but let's say even if Peter had a special treatment all Apostles where equal in the face of Jesus and mostly they made Councils regarding certain things which the Orthodox still do today regarding doctrine and theological debate and if one bishop or priest doesn't agrees the change is nulled as it was for the all Ecum Council. To bad Rome is to proud to recognize its power hungry past and today's

[@jacko8030]

Leo don’t mind me I’m just waiting for the shit storm in this commend feed to start

[@arthegor]

@@jacko8030 usually Roman Catholics don t even listen to the east s concerns and they react pretty baddly to these accusations telling us yeah Peter is that Pope is supreme well how about we read the bible a bit and look at the passages the RC are stating that the Pope is the supreme we will find in reality that none is true and that Jesus never raised Peter above the Other Apostles.

[@jacko8030]

Leo I’m neither catholic or orthodox so I have no stake in this. I do agree with what you’re saying about the pope wanting primacy over the other patriarchs being one of the reasons why the churches split

[@johnkilmartin5101]

Prior to the Islamic occupation of Alexandria, Jerusalem and Antioch the Popes were much more receptive to consulting with the other four Patriarchs. There were more frequent synods of bishops during this period. Once only Constantinople and Rome were under Christian control the Popes pushed a more hierarchical structure. If the Great Schism hadn't occurred before Constantinople fell another issue would have caused a split soon after. A similar split happened most recently in Ukraine so there are now Uniate Catholic churches, Moscow Patriarch churches, and Kiev Patriarch churches.

[@Mate_Mateo]

Peter alone is mentioned about 180 times in Bible while all other Apostles combined around 130. Papacy was ment to be.

[@vineethvish11]

Makes me want to play Assassins Creed 🧐

[@drg.naufal]

Crusader Kings 2

[@benben2979]

that's flex

[@MartinMizner]

Coments here be like: - people who like this video - people who like conspiracy - people who defend the truth - people who fight for conspiracy because they think they defend the truth

[@withered8022]

Esti de sau do? (am uitat)

[@mikesands4681]

Don't use robo reader. Spend the extra 20 minutes to speak it. More nuance

[@simplesimonspeaks1115]

?

[@sjakierulez]

?

[@jadenalmeida8592]

Gregory the 7th henry the 4th

[@WeSeGe]

First pope in history wore the cross upside down.. That should give you something to think about before worshiping the popes.

[@KenDelloSandro7565]

St Peter was the first Pope. He was crucified upside down because he told The Roman soldiers at his execution that he wasn't worthy of the same style of execution as his Master. He never wore any kind of cross, especially not an inverted one. I understand why some people despise the Church and the Vicar of Christ, especially living in the countries that betrayed Our Blessed Lord and the Church of their fathers and then started their own "state" churches . Like the heretical sects of Luther and Calvin. Countries that broke away from England, esp the USA and Australia, are taught from infancy that the Catholic Church is evil and the Pope is the antichrist etc. Look at it this way; the Church has many pieces of filth and trash who represent Her,even from the very beginning..Judas Iscariot was one of the original 12, ordained a bishop from the Hands of Our Blessed Lord Himself, then betrayed Him ...Betrayed God Himself!!! That's proof of mankind's fallen nature and if not in a state of grace, man would commit terrible deeds: even inside the Church. After 2000 years of existence and after MANY horrible Popes, bishops, priests etc poisoning the Church from the inside making Her look soo bad, causing scandal after scandal....Amazingly the Church is still in existence. If that in itself is not some proof that the Church is of 100% Devine origin and of God, then idk what is....

[@substitute409]

Shows how much you lack in history the satanists are dumb and actually they dont like if u say them why u have the upside down cross because that was made up by some dumb people they worship the symbol of lucifer that is in a vector form the upisde cross is the cross of st.peter the first sucessor who was crossed upside down.

[@mackycabangon8945]

DEUS VULT DEUS VULT DEUS VULT DEUS VULT DEUS VULT DEUS VULT DEUS VULT DEUS VULT

[@shaleemn]

Nice video but you butchered so many words in this - it's not "eccalesiastic" but "ecclesiastic" or more accurately "ecclesiastical", it's "vicar" not "vicaaaar" and the Pope is not the head of the "state of the Vatican", he is the head of Vatican City!! It's not called "Vatican" or "the Vatican" but rather the name of the country is "Vatican City", it is commonly referred to as a city-state because it is comprised of a single city. Also you said 'the christiandom", it is actually "christendom" where the "t" is silent. I like your videos but please proof read your script before posting 👍

[@ryanjapan3113]

Too much

[@jafrisahab6048]

Muslim has defeated all the crusader many times We muslim are the descended of great warriors.

[@nilesh.christian6474]

If you Muslim are great warrior. You and Yours 56 Muslim Countries combined army fight against only Russa or US if you and Yours brother's have a Dare.

[@Angelo-rj5er]

The truth teller you’re funny

[@DEMON-vv8it]

@@nilesh.christian6474 Hindu 😂😂😂

[@MartinMizner]

Crusaders army was full of poor pilgrims and some knights. Their only goal was to get to the palestine or create stable way there.

[@harshvardhanborgohain1781]

Ok abdool

[@MrSinthan]

Too.

[@ivanstrydom8417]

06:50 No the schism had nothing to do with the Crusades, the schism happened way before the 1st Crusade... Try to keep your ''facts'' straight.

[@jc2coming]

Who knows Scriptures, please tell me who said: "My Kingdom is not of this world..." "I do not belong to this world..." "This world belongs to the evil one..." and if you don't know, "the evil one" is Satan! "This world is under the control of the evil one..." "Satan, the ruler of this world..." "If you love this world...the love of the Father is not in you...for this world belongs to the evil one..." So according to Scriptures above...Who is really the pope? if he is the ruler of this world? Can you put together 2 + 2 = 4? Dan.7 & 8 and Rev.13 & 17 reveal exactly who is the papacy is...He is the Little Horn of Dan.7 and Dan.8 for our Father in Heaven reveals to those who love the truth and live by the truth, but the rest of the world, those love NOT the truth they remained in the great deception Scriptures foretold!

[@johnchrysostomibarra]

But the Pope is NOT the ruler of this world, that means your interpretation of scripture is wrong.

[@jc2coming]

@@johnchrysostomibarra First, I did not interpreted, but The Father and His Son revealed and taught me everything I need to know, just as Scriptures said in Dan.7; Dan.9, Dan.11, and Rev.13 and Rev.17!!! Even history showed the papacy did rule the world...and still does, but not so upfront but more behind the scene now...but as Scriptures also said, the WHOLE world is deceived and cannot see, and you belong and live according to this world so you are too deceived and cannot see no matter what...this is what Scriptures said (Isaiah 60:2; Rev.12:9).

[@johnchrysostomibarra]

@@jc2coming In what way does the Father and the Son revealed and taught about all that you said? Did God revealed to you in a dream like He did to Joseph? Or in a form of light like what happened to Paul? Or are you just pressuming like thousands and thousands of protestants do by privately interpreting the scriptures? History can't deny the fact that the Pope had a great influence among the Empires and Kingdoms in the Medieval Era, but that does not mean the Pope is the little horn mentioned in the Bible. Your interpretation of scripture is typical among protestant churches who don't even agree with each others interpretaion of scripture.

[@jc2coming]

@@johnchrysostomibarra The Father & The Son revealed to me exactly the way Scriptures tell us, through His Ruach/Spirit, which is the same way He did with Mosheh and the prophets and all of His elects. Only a few times through dreams/visions but most of the time through His Ruach. As the apostles shared with us, we direct access through the Father/Son through His Ruach/Spirit, as mentioned all over Scriptures! Once He revealed, your eyes are opened to the truth...and I see clearly that the Pope had, and now is ruling the world though now more behind the scene...but the world cannot see, because they are under the power of the evil one, exactly as Scriptures said!!! And NO, I am not a protestant. Christendom is a deception, a counterfeit of the truth. I used to be a very devoted Catholics but I am one of those that The Father called "come out of her My people" prophesied fulfilled!!! Before truly reborn I kept wondering why Christians were not living like Scriptures said, why our prayers were not being answered, and many miracles were not happening like in the apostle times or before that...now I know why, because before I was being deceived like all Christians were, for Scriptures repeatedly told us that this world belongs to Satan, and that He rules and has deceived the WHOLE world (Isaiah 60:2; Rev.12:9) so we were praying to false names which were Satan's who deceived the WHOLE world into worshiping him thinking he is god. In fact, all the names & title the world uses are Satan's...before you got upset/angry go and read those Scriptures and see if it said "Satan has deceived the whole world" first...how could Scriptures repeatedly tell us all that and yet NOT one person of this world even see it even though they read the Bible? Because they are deceived/blind just as Scriptures said, so much so that even when I pointed out to them, the truth is too much so they denied and attack me...but this is not me but The Word of our Heavenly Father!!! And as Scriptures also said, only those who belong to The Father believe the truth...those belong to the world will listen to what the world said.

[@rares9885]

Do de la lumea lui dedo

[@stayrospaparunas3062]

Ινοκεντιος

[@beniruscior3444]

Cinei de sau do

[@antique9032]

Dedooo cf

[@GeorgeMunte]

Dedo

[@gamingthisera6339]

Christian become powerful after the reformation

[@gamingthisera6339]

@John Alejandro 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 let them have their fun in hell 6 the Muslim Population is actually decreasing

[@MartinMizner]

@John Alejandro they had to choose between progressing with decadence and certain crash or to progress slowly with strong morals and slowly conquer the world. Or both. You see what did they have chosen.

[@rockztah911]

reformation is the best accomplishment of the devil

[@gamingthisera6339]

@@rockztah911 in reality, ML saved us from being scam by the churches

[@rockztah911]

@@gamingthisera6339 in reality ML lead millions/billions of souls astray/damnation

[@ericlangenberg707]

Why is the English in these videos so weird?

[@xtusvincit5230]

Your pronunciations are tortured. It is clear you only have read and not heard much of your vocabulary. Get some help with this.

[@zanetapetroska6049]

Nope! Papa is for Chatolik Cristians we ordox use word -ARHIEPISCOP OR SVEŚTENIK LIKE VRESELNSKI PATRIJARH

[@HVLLOWS1999]

Pontifex Maximus = Pope in latin Roman Catholicism isn't just Greco-Roman religion repainted with a Jewish touch. Nah that's rediculous.

[@BoqPrecision]

Orthodox Christian Church even more...

[@historycenter4011]

Except for the entire monotheism thing, but that's irrelevant.

[@HVLLOWS1999]

@@historycenter4011 They pray to Saints & Mary and Angels like their gods. That's not even a Biblical practice

[@historycenter4011]

@@HVLLOWS1999 Yeah, BUT they're explicitly not gods.

[@HVLLOWS1999]

@@historycenter4011 Ya your right, i think the practice comes from Polytheism though.

[@RB-qd1zi]

Bring back the Papal States

[@stefanschleps8758]

I am sure that much of what you read is considered true. But for one important factor. Neith Peter, nor Paul are the first Apostles of the church. The title, that honor, belongs to Mary Magdaline. Mary is the first Apostle. There can be no doubt about this. None whatsoever. Mary the first Pope

[@omororagland4850]

Peter and Paul had nothing to do with the start of being Catholic

[@lawmaker22]

Ofcourse.... Jesus started catholicism, in those days called only The Church... Because there were not zilion christian inerpretations

[@omororagland4850]

@@lawmaker22 absolutely not Christ told us to obey the law and to do the Sabbath which is fm friday sundown to Saturday sundown but the Pope will tell u no it's now Sunday wen it changed under Constantine in 325 ad the Bible warns us about the people who will change the times and laws those who make right wrong and wrong right( the same way Europeans promoted homosexuality globally and now y'all have these transgender camps for kids trying to confuse them and change their own sexuality?) Anyone who thinks they can go in the Bible and change it only because they want to it's only because they have nothing to do with this anyway so if you look in the back of Revelation and you see where Christ is doing all the killing In the book of Isaiah it lets you know he's coming back to kill the Gentiles and the Gentiles are the ones who put him on that cross

[@lawmaker22]

@@omororagland4850 ok look, who created Bible? Especially New Testament

[@omororagland4850]

@@lawmaker22 God inspired our people to write the book and when I say our people I mean Israelites not Jews not Israelis or in other words the fake Jews whom God told us about in Revelation 2:9 and in Revelation 3:9.....

[@johnchrysostomibarra]

@@omororagland4850 Christians way back before Constantine were Sunday worshippers, so how did you get that idea that Constantine change the sabbath to Sunday?

[@arandomwalk]

The Western Roman Empire did NOT fall, nor started to fall in the first century