I’m loving all of these Royal documentaries- so well crafted and illuminating 😊
@lizhorton53332 жыл бұрын
These documentaries are so interesting and give so many behind the scenes insights about history that fictitious shows like the Crown can never provide their audience.
@pambetz708011 ай бұрын
😊😊
@harrytree780811 ай бұрын
These documentaries however well put together by such talented people only relate what is the preferred account for the public perception by whoever discloses the information. There are no historical public posts concerning the eldest son of Edward 7th and Alexandra who was born unannounced, baptized and abandoned in June 1862. This event was not made, nor is being made, public, until right now, with this revelation. Why now? The descendants of the abandoned son have irrefutable evidence of DNA that show zero distance from the Royal Family members. Zero distance. Unfortunately, the Royal Family are treating their "new" Royal Family relatives with disdain and ignoring them and have done so since the announcement of the passing of the late Queen Elizabeth 2nd. Hence the publicity now. Oh dear...
@Rosemary-vf5ei4 ай бұрын
@@harrytree7808 The eldest son of Edward VII and Alexandra was Albert Victor who died of pneumonia whilst engaged to Mary of Teck. He had no children.
@harrytree78084 ай бұрын
@@Rosemary-vf5ei only according to the official version, the irrefutable DNA evidence is fact, not an invention but irrefutable DNA evidence that his descendants have zero DNA distance between them and the Royal Family relatives x
@harrytree78084 ай бұрын
@@Rosemary-vf5ei incorrect. The evidence is the irrefutable descendent DNA of the eldest son of King Edward 7th and Queen Alexandra, who was born unannounced, baptized with an assumed name and sadly abandoned in South Africa in June 1862, in keeping with the view of Queen Victoria who regarded illegitimate children as Ghosts Best Forgotten... The official version does not mention this eldest son, to spare the dignity and moral standing of both the UK and Danish Royal Families x
@nancyM13132 жыл бұрын
Very interesting and the later incidents we 📰witnessed 📰📻📺 Now we are watching HRH👑 Grandchildren grow up.
@gnlilu69722 жыл бұрын
This is an outstanding 💯 video!
@ScarletKnight11112 жыл бұрын
Woah…wow…who knew the Royals were so relatable…I loved the clubbing and Team Risky 🤩🥂 I really enjoyed everything…I love how our stories were reflected in their stories…love, affairs, sexuality, clubbing, parties 🎉, drinking, smoking, rehab, change, actors, singers, fashion designers, fashion icons, fame, war, environment…so much….wow that’s amazing 🤩 I hope this cheered everyone up as well 🕊🔥💂♀️👑🤍🖤❤️
@carolharris23572 жыл бұрын
Not the first George kissing up to Hitler's regime.
@agnetalaw85522 жыл бұрын
。。
@evedent38612 жыл бұрын
@@carolharris2357 no
@evedent38612 жыл бұрын
Pico Poco3
@ScarletKnight11112 жыл бұрын
@@carolharris2357 they royals don’t know you
@lc78982 жыл бұрын
This is a brilliant documentary 💐 Thank you very much!
@emmagatewood38982 жыл бұрын
The Queen Mum was in phenomenal shape at her 100th birthday! Walking on her own, looking presentable, and of sound mind. They've got some good genes in that family.
@laureldemille6232 жыл бұрын
It's because they only use homeopathic remedies and shun pharmaceutical medicines that make the body sicker and lower immune system response
@derekmullings15072 жыл бұрын
@Emma Gatewood. They're inbred. Marrying your cousin does not produce good genes. Quite the opposite. Have you heard of the Hapsburg jaw? Do you know about the queen's mentally challenged cousins Katherine and Nerissa who were locked away? They live longer due to access to the kind of healthcare that the average person can only dream of. Amongst other stuff that you wouldn't want to believe.
@derekmullings15072 жыл бұрын
@Happy Golucky yes that helps too. And an excellent diet.
@UnicornsPoopRainbows2 жыл бұрын
I dunno about the genetics, lots of inbreeding and genetic diseases that were kept quiet. Truly can't argue about their health tho. They must have amazing doctors and take their advice seriously
@meagancobb14172 жыл бұрын
Honestly, I expected HM to live at least as long as her mother. I just think she couldn't live without her husband, which is not uncommon in couples that have been together that long.
@narellecox20282 жыл бұрын
Great documentary thank you.
@thefinecolumbian2 жыл бұрын
I think whoever said that David and Wallace's relationship was the greatest love story of all time should take a look at the letters Wallis wrote.
@pAusten2 жыл бұрын
That was Madonna that said that 🙄
@KingofgraceSARA2 жыл бұрын
She was a nasty something!
@mariajosealmeyda5196 Жыл бұрын
@@pAusten 17:36 17:36
@khoryangtan6228 Жыл бұрын
@@pAusten mòò cfè39
@shirleyminassian1547 Жыл бұрын
Lol, ppl just throw things out there sometimes.
@lornastevens79802 жыл бұрын
Great voice of the presenter TIME will always tell no matter how long.
@babshodgkinson2 жыл бұрын
I love William. He's so honest and upright. His wife and children are a credit to this country. Thankyou 💖
@glen73189 ай бұрын
are they?
@Paola-fv7wz8 ай бұрын
William honest, no, you're kidding. What did he do with kate
@brendafulmernickel12187 ай бұрын
Diana is the positive legacy!!
@mamareed8102 жыл бұрын
Why didn't this documentary let the story unfold in chronological order? Jumping all over the decades left this piece disjointed.
@janetwilcock21202 жыл бұрын
Mary of Teck had a German father but her mother was British, Princess Mary Adelaide of Cambridge and Princess May as she was known was born at Kensington Palace and lived in England for most of her life apart from when the Tecks moved abroad to save money and most definitely considered herself to be British.
@lidiawolanskyj55602 жыл бұрын
I do thinnk the point was being made that they were all related....
@CartoonHistory2 жыл бұрын
Thats Lady Rosamund Painswick from Downton Abbey - I'd recognise that voice from anywhere!
@Ater_Draco2 жыл бұрын
Samantha Bond
@ryeofoatmeal2 жыл бұрын
young Queen Mother looks very pretty. literally looks like those from old paintings. and also, damn she lives in a castle with a big family. she has 9 siblings?? wow
@robertandhollyscorpiofan26972 жыл бұрын
I just looked her wikipedia page (which, yes, are not always 100% accurate). She is the second youngest of nine, three older sisters, five older brothers, one younger brother.
@cb4883 Жыл бұрын
She wanted to be with Edward but he didn't fancy her that's why she hated Wallis
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
@@cb4883 absolute nonsense. Edward was not her type at all.
@jaijai5250Ай бұрын
Oh please! The fawning is vomit inducing. I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I don’t understand why you people lie to yourselves. She was NEVER pretty!
@julieannejoolz2 жыл бұрын
Im glad Edward gave up the throne because if he hadn't we wouldn't have our beautiful Queen and we wouldn't have William and Catherine! They will be so well loved..they are already loved and Willam has proved he is a loving and loyal member of the family and he has the right qualities to be a wonderful King with Catherine by his side ❤️ 🌹🙏👑
@mykoniichistorychannel2 жыл бұрын
We probably would have. Edward never had children.
@katerinazhilina2 жыл бұрын
he did not betray his love - that's the point real royal choice
@daviniarobbins92982 жыл бұрын
Edward was sterile. He couldn't father children due to a childhood illness.
@juliephillips33742 жыл бұрын
balls. get rid of them all. why do we need them plus the politicians?? money money money
@BlackStump1722 жыл бұрын
@@juliephillips3374 You get rid of them and you will end up with a politician as Head Of State !
@peggykelly50192 жыл бұрын
The romance of the century? A great love affair? Certainly not. The story is fascinating, yes. Because a man gave up so much for a woman who did not love him. Either she was an incredible deceiver or he was self-deceived and very weak of character.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
He gave up because he didn’t wanted the burden of being a king, not for love. He was a selfish man, because Churchill told him to have Simpson as mistress and move on as king, he didn’t wanted. He wasn’t a conservative that wanted a wife and many kids, quite opposite, he wanted just to keep having mistresses. I hope that half of what they said about him is not true, like having male partners, that’s completely nuts, denigrating to any human, never mind the one that was a king.
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 what are you on about? Are you saying htat having male parnters is nuts?
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
@@glen7318 to imply he was gay it is. Because he wasn’t. They did that to denigrate it him, to put a stain on him. Remember, at that time people didn’t live a gay open life, and to call someone gay without him being one, yes, it was insulting to him or any other human being that wasn’t truly gay. My daughter is gay, okay, so I am not here bashing gay people. You live life as you want, period.
@jeanneshipton49112 жыл бұрын
still not as loathsome as megan.we can all see through her narcissistic manipulation of harry. she'll drop him the minute a better deal comes along as she claws her way up the social ladder. could harry have met a woman with less character? poor chap.
@vgzm2 жыл бұрын
@@jeanneshipton4911 If you would have a little respect for the Queen, you wouldn't trash talk her family, especially when you don't even know these people.
@cide31972 жыл бұрын
Great narrator voice on this video! I was impressed to learn that the Queen Mother supported/defended gay staff. Also hadn’t heard before that QE2 had sent notification to the public after Diana’s death, as to why she didn’t immediately return to London. Gives me the impression that the press is responsible for stirring up the public’s bad sentiments. What a shame that media wasn’t more understanding during this family tragedy.
@donna73382 жыл бұрын
I believe the narrator is Samantha Bond who played on Downton Abbey as the sister to Lord Grantham and daughter to the Dowager Countess played by Maggie Smith. She was also in Rumpole of the Bailey about 50 years ago.
@cide31972 жыл бұрын
@@donna7338 / Thanks. That’s what I thought too. She sure did a fantastic job, so clear.
@gojo21942 жыл бұрын
One narrator sounds like Zoe Wannamaker
@donna73382 жыл бұрын
@@gojo2194 Possibly ZW, but I think it was Samantha Bond. I didn't see any name in the credits as to the narrator.
@aerialpyropewpew2 жыл бұрын
@@donna7338 You are correct. It's Samantha Bond.
@balafama21202 жыл бұрын
Bertie's best gift to Britain was his daughter Queen Elizabeth.
@nightbloomer47392 жыл бұрын
It’s too bad she doesn’t have more substantial role re affairs of state. She has a very calming presence and sense of tact. Her family situation is enough to drive a saint crazy, but she moves forward without display of bitterness. I don’t fault her for dysfunction, but instead the time her children grew up and now live in, it’s not compatible with royal tradition.
@pammaggio81352 жыл бұрын
@bala gala… bloody well said!👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼❤️
@dorothygale11042 жыл бұрын
The monarch has as much utility as the hood ornament on a Rolls Royce. as he monarch serves no useful purpose other than to sit there as a symbol of a bygone age.
@whateverrrrrr1232 жыл бұрын
Lilibet best gift to Britain was living long
@lorrainearmstrong75872 жыл бұрын
@@whateverrrrrr123 Lilibet is a baby. I believe you mean to say Queen Elizabeth II
@CB-zd2dn Жыл бұрын
The royals time and effort they put towards charities is remarkable even in their later years. The late queen will be missed by so many around the world for a long time to come. I still remember her coming to Quebec in the 70s when I was about 3 yrs old everyone lined the streets very excited and how her calm voice during covid just made everyone feel better. I'm sure with all the cruel comments that keep coming their way and being blamed for ancestors that were in power 100s of years before they were born they would love to walk away some days but instead they keep showing up to all the non profits and events that count on them because at the end of the day the haters are just a small percentage. Still they insist on trying to ruin happy events like the coronation with their screaming and shouting not my King. If you get your wish and take away the Royal family you in the end take away jobs and a big percent of the tourism that many earn a living on. Try helping those in need instead of picketing and you might soon find that your hate is replaced by hope. :)
@dragosapina5692 Жыл бұрын
What is remarkable is that anyone believes they put in time to anything but theft
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
very interesting. I wonder how m uch time Charles spends stealng? Is he a burglar?@@dragosapina5692
@zillahwanogho66312 жыл бұрын
King George the 6th was truly an honourable man his wife the Queen mother was without doubt a devoted wife to the present Queen Elizabeth's farher a loving mother two the queen & princess Margrete and a mother figure to the UK..
@jeanniecooper7390 Жыл бұрын
The queen mother loved the power, not the people, her type! Yes, even after the king died she still held over some power over her daughter and poor Prince Philip had a awful time with her. Look at her Eyes and mouth, Not kind evil and nasty.
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
@@jeanniecooper7390 evidence?
@madonnaadell746511 ай бұрын
THANKS 😊
@christinegatto74262 жыл бұрын
I was told my grandmother had this to say about Wallis Simpson, "She was like an old mattress. Everybody laid on her."
@ladyramen76552 жыл бұрын
Ewww- I cannot unsee that
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
rather a silly thing to ssay unless one has evidence.
@catherineward11882 жыл бұрын
I read the QM referred to her as “the woman who killed my husband.”
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
@@catherineward1188 thatnis not the same as saying she was promiscouus for which there is no evidence
@annhewett96222 жыл бұрын
Just like Camilla and Edward VII
@AnnalyFaith2 жыл бұрын
Watching on September 11 2022. 'one day, he will be king' ... That day has come... God bless the Queen. God save the king.
@purdygirlxo2 жыл бұрын
They see u as nothing more than the trash they have their servants dispose of, don't kid yourself .
@jaijai5250Ай бұрын
@@purdygirlxoI’m late to this discussion, but these people are nauseating. That family actually despise them!
@shellecapos85742 жыл бұрын
The Monarchs extravagance is OUTRAGEOUS!!
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
how so?
@donsarde Жыл бұрын
The revolting opulence of the upper classes was always the way in Europe and the British ruling classs were no exception to the rule ! King George VI was an great and brave monarch, never giving in to the Nazi Germany's terror.
@harrytree780811 ай бұрын
Compare your own income and expenditure with a destitute, homeless, donkey cart dung whallah with 5 or more children to care for in an environment where this is the norm...
@harrytree780811 ай бұрын
In comparison to who, with your expenditure being compared with a homeless destitute assistant donkey cart dung whallah with 5 children to care for in an environment where this is the norm???
@glen73189 ай бұрын
@@donsarde so how come George VI was not revoltingly extravagant? ANd the British upper classes fought the War against Nazi Germany
@thomasrandleman70572 жыл бұрын
Love the presenter and have appreciated her from many fine films and television programs. But I think she speaks to rapidly for these documentaries, Lovely voice and cadence, but much to fast for these programs. A great deal more impact and gravitas if spoken a tad more slowly. No complaints, just a comment.
@adrianamckendrick91722 жыл бұрын
L
@mariejules11302 жыл бұрын
Gorgeous pieces of jewlry
@jaijai5250Ай бұрын
Absolutely beautiful pieces of jewellery. All of them stolen from someone else. Most of you simply couldn’t comprehend why a party theme of “colonisers and natives” would be such an insult to most of the so called commonwealth. There’s a lot of wealth, but it certainly isn’t common!
@Shelly-mz9yf5 ай бұрын
Whoa this is interesting. Never would've known these boys actually experienced a bit of real world, however sheltered Harry. Thank you for the documentary. This does put puzzle pieces together for those of us on the outlier of said drama
@cocoaddams45022 жыл бұрын
"The Traitor King" is an excellent book that just came out. Churchill ordered all the documents proving Edward's collusion with the Nazis destroyed. The author puts the true story together from other sources -- mostly the letters of people who knew him. And the two of them were horrible -- HORRIBLE -- people. Just hilariously bad. They treated their staff terribly; one servant whose wife had died asked Wallis if he could leave early so he could put his kids to bed. Wallis told him if he did leave, he shouldn't come back. One of the Rothschilds let Edward stay at her palace while they were waiting for Walis to be available to marry again. He was very sad and stayed on the phone with Wallis for hours. $800 phone bills arrived and the Duke assumed his hostess would pay them (she did). They were notoriously cheap. The night the Duke gave his speech, he left to sail across to France. During the voyage, he started sending out telegrams to all his friends about what he'd done. When the Duke was told he'd need to pay for telegrams sent from the ship once they got closer to France, the Duke ordered the ship back out to sea. Then he bragged about saving money. Oh my God they were horrible.
@TheAnkstar2 жыл бұрын
You must be very old.
@happyinparis2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting post.
@happyinparis2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAnkstar You must be very rude. Sad.
@TheAnkstar2 жыл бұрын
@@happyinparis well as she wrote this it sounds like she was there at the time. So it was a conclusion that she must be very old to know all that.
@cocoaddams45022 жыл бұрын
@@TheAnkstar I'm sorry if you were confused by my summarizing history in a compelling way.
@mariejules11302 жыл бұрын
Thank you for following it was a wonderful documentary the royal stories
@gr8fuldeb6992 жыл бұрын
Sad part about the abdication is wallace didnt love edward. She was a social climber and admitted it basically in her letters to her ex husband.
@HopkinsChloe2 жыл бұрын
Well she’s buried with Edward now at Windsor castle!
@Cedric_.32 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@trezariusclyde48612 жыл бұрын
But she did
@melissafountain27572 жыл бұрын
True. She was receiving carnations daily from one of Hitler's minions. It is also known that David and Wallace were Nazi sympathizers and that was brought to the attention of Mr. Churchill and many others, so the mention of her on-going affair of the car salesman during her affair with David was not all of the story. She loved BEING with edward. Better parties and Hitler was powerful so more fun. This is so sad. As a teenager I was in love with this romance but in the end things worked out. "Bertie," his brother became King George VI and he was a kind person whose daughter is not only your Queen but a lovely woman.
@cc17792 жыл бұрын
And within letters to David, she begged him not to abdicate, because she knew she'd have to marry him to save face for Him.
@philipcollins218Ай бұрын
This is great - best laugh I have had all. Thank you truly hilarious
@sherybrownjones37952 жыл бұрын
I'm impressed to some people love is more important than power and money!
@robertandhollyscorpiofan26972 жыл бұрын
Yup, been that way for centuries….
@glen73189 ай бұрын
rubbish. Edward did not want to give up any power that he could hang on to, he continued to phone the new king and hassle him with advice, and he felt he shd still be treated as royal, and he certainly was very greedy for money
@maryhirsch71702 жыл бұрын
Truthfully, she wanted to be back with Simpson, but considering what he gave up for her, she couldn't. So you tell me, what kind of love story is that?
@WickedFelina2 жыл бұрын
About to leave the same comment. Why, when the trove of letters and diary of Wallis has been found by W Simpson's historian, who originally was a supporter? Bother's me to no end, when history documentaries really get it wrong.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
Now we know it wasn’t love that made him abdicated, but other forces, politically forces.
@JJWoosh22 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 makes sense. Most men or women wouldn’t abdicate for love. At least if they have any sense about them
@chrispapa27822 жыл бұрын
Exactly. It was just that Edward Albert was a sucker.
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 it was love. He was so besotted with Wallis that he would not consider any compromises....
@lisabradford81802 жыл бұрын
the panther bracelet💖👍👍
@BlackStump1722 жыл бұрын
Wallis’ jewellery was stunning and really showed off well with her exquisite classic wardrobe . Her taste was superb .
@kathybutterfield27602 жыл бұрын
She did have great taste and was an excellent hostess. Her jewelry was gorgeous! Her monkey dress and lobster dress!
@lovelitany2 жыл бұрын
This poem is dedicated to Queen Elizabeth II may she rest in peace Queenie I love the Queen she was never horrible, never mean She was a wonderful head of state, with all the worlds problems on her plate, Like politicians destroying her country, upholding traditions and all their superstitions, She was assiduous to her duties, carried out with Grace and Beauty, she Devoted her life to the service of this Country, A dutiful wife, bringing life, bearing the sorrows of her nation! Regal and Sovereign, a Jewel in the Crown Of gods beautiful creation 🙏✨🌍
@VLove-CFII2 жыл бұрын
Patrick Jepson’s book was spot on…like it or not.
@victoriadiaries90872 жыл бұрын
Princess Diana's genetics made the Royal men look actually handsome. Thank God for Diana's dominant genes.
@areasonableperson242 жыл бұрын
And tall. ❤️🌷🌸
@cocoaddams45022 жыл бұрын
Right? I'll never understand how two people as attractive as Phillip and Elizabeth made those four average-- looking kids. Andrew is OKAy looking and he's considered the handsome one.
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
@@cocoaddams4502 what is the problem iwht this? The RF are not models or film stars. They do not have to be good looking
@itsruckaswife70362 жыл бұрын
Err .. what? Her son's are anything but...
@kruljadwiga2 жыл бұрын
I wish Diana was still here. She’d sort everybody out.
@rossanamuller31582 жыл бұрын
I agree the Berti’s best gift to Britain her daughter Elisabeth!
@julianasio49902 жыл бұрын
What a wonderful story. Prince Charles grandfather King George last for 14 years to be a King the mother last successfully such a long time almost her life time and I guess the new King will be last a one year or maybe less than one year it's dependent on his Health. His son is ready to become next King 🤴 he is old enough to take over. God bless the Royals family.
@YTfancol2 жыл бұрын
The best legacy of King George is his amazing daughter Elizabeth.
@katiewarburton83392 жыл бұрын
Will there be a part 3? :)
@jakehiller64442 жыл бұрын
The part about Harry being happy being the spare heir didn't age well
@genxx27242 жыл бұрын
And because Harry well and truly spat in his family’s faces, I’m sure William won’t be underwriting his pathetic life with a single shilling from the Duchy of Cornwall. D’oh!
@robertandhollyscorpiofan26972 жыл бұрын
@@genxx2724 EVERYTHING hairy has said and done since his marriage is controlled by the thing he married.
@lauren9004 Жыл бұрын
Right!
@LilySimpson-pt4gb Жыл бұрын
Happy father day love u all ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ im trying to get job and place to rent i think im setup place but sure know bb coming ill stay more crefull promess that only thing i need to be setup
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
@@genxx2724 why would he be expecting anything from William?
@WhiteDragon6892 жыл бұрын
Its not really a love story. It is a bad situation for both of them. Both got into it but could not get themselves out of it and had to play those roles. I think both were miserable behind closed doors.
@cocoaddams45022 жыл бұрын
I think she was dazzled by his lifestyle and he was obsessed with her. He had 16 pictures of Wallis in his bedroom, apparently.
@dianereta59072 жыл бұрын
The reason behind Edward's abdication was not Wallis Simpson, it was Winston Churchill.
@MonticaT64792 жыл бұрын
I had a professor in college that said this too!
@michasolis38702 жыл бұрын
Howso?
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
what are you on about?
@maggie2sticks7172 жыл бұрын
How is that? He wasn't PM then.
@elainekoren83262 жыл бұрын
It wasn’t Winston Churchill but Stanley Baldwin who was the Prime Minister at the time. He tricked Edward in seeking government approval to his proposal of marrying Wallace Simpson. Once the then king asked the question of his government, he had to accept Baldwin’s response.
@Ladylady-qc7rd2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful i love the Queen 👸
@gnlilu69722 жыл бұрын
I'm happy that Edward gave up the throne!
@mypointofview11112 жыл бұрын
I wish the rest would follow suit
@junescoular2922 жыл бұрын
@@mypointofview1111 But then, you'd have nothing to moan about .....
@ggaffgaff9662 жыл бұрын
I’m only just starting this- but didn’t it come out that she never wanted to marry him, and was in love with her first husband? There’s letters saying that she tried to leave Edward, and he threatened suicide - there’s a whole book about it.
@lauren9004 Жыл бұрын
Yes I think that’s true
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
You mean her second husband
@ggaffgaff966 Жыл бұрын
@@glen7318 yes I do -you’re right
@shirleyminassian1547 Жыл бұрын
I heard that too...personally I think, n it's just my opinion, I suspect his family were so embarrassed of his actions being a spy working with the Germans that they used Wallis as an excuse to ensure he abdicated cause they couldn't trust him...why else would Wallis be forced to marry him, I dont believe Edward was obsessed with her, he could of had other lovers...the awful, heartless Queen mother blaming Edward for the early death of King George VI was not true I suspect...that woman complained about EVERYONE except Charles.
@shirleyminassian1547 Жыл бұрын
@@c.w.8200 I believe that too.
@myunknownland92722 жыл бұрын
She never loved him and regretted the marriage! See other documentaries where they read and show her letter of regret.
@tonil.4762 жыл бұрын
Who never loved who?
@myunknownland92722 жыл бұрын
@@tonil.476 ,Wallace, they found a letter written to her ex husband after her death. But she was loyal and stayed with him. Have a look on utube you can find the documentary. Xo
@lindajennings54122 жыл бұрын
@@tonil.476&
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
@@myunknownland9272 many letters, many.
@lindafurr24042 жыл бұрын
Wallis wanted to be rich and queen. Once she attached herself to Edward she put herself in a situation where she couldn’t divorce him. She wrote her ex-husband that she regretted leaving him and marrying Edward. She was not a good wife to him.
@kate_cooper2 жыл бұрын
How was Margaret tenth in line to the throne as a kid? That would have made Elizabeth ninth, Bertie eighth, and David seventh. Which clearly wasn’t the case.
@fionasteele8502 жыл бұрын
QE2 was the eldest daughter of the king . He dies suddenly , so she automatically was next in line. She had Charles in her 20s, So now he is next in line , and then his son William, and so very shorty after she became Queen of England ,> Charles was next in line .
@kate_cooper2 жыл бұрын
@@fionasteele850 Yes, I know all that and it’s irrelevant to what I was saying. The video claimed that Margaret was born tenth in line, and she wasn’t. Edward the Prince of Wales was first, then his brother Bertie (George VI) then Bertie’s daughters, Elizabeth and Margaret. So Margaret was born fourth in line, not tenth. The only time Margaret was tenth in line was before the birth of Princess Eugenie because Charles, William, Harry, Andrew, Beatrice, Edward, Anne, Peter, and Zara (in that order) come to nine people ahead of Margaret.
@kate_cooper2 жыл бұрын
@@bumblebee5508 Are you sure? Because Queen Victoria had uncles who would have come before her if that was the case. Her father was never king.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
@@kate_cooper were women, the ones that wasn’t first born in line at all? Because it was only men.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
@@kate_cooper oh no, the line is direct, not going that far, because they were all in other countries already. Queen Victoria position all of her daughters to marry into Europeans best families to be princess consorts or Queens.
@Joylibelle2 жыл бұрын
"A female in the milk business was the only one not curious" 😂
@judithsweeney25532 жыл бұрын
There is a lot of overlap between parts 1 and 2. Good footage, though.
@Genevois12052 жыл бұрын
Diana Mitford's husband was named Sir Oswald Moseley, not Sir Edward. And the gentleman from The Sun got it wrong altogether. The Duke of Windsor made a half hearted attempt at excusing himself in his memoirs, but he did finally acknowledge that he was wrong in his support of Hitler. Of course he did it in his characteristic way of minimising the support he had for him. Unlike Mosely who went on to try to found a European fascist party after the War (which failed everywhere except in Italy...his party there sent 32 delegates to the European Parliament before the party was disbanded).
@kate_cooper Жыл бұрын
There seems to be several errors in this video. "Edward met Wallis when he was 36 and she was 41" is incorrect because Wallis was younger than him.
@Genevois1205 Жыл бұрын
@@kate_cooper She was actually two years younger than he was...he was born 23 June 1894 while she was born 19 June 1896. Curious how their birthdays were only 4 days apart as well...
@kate_cooper Жыл бұрын
@@Genevois1205 Exactly, how did they confuse two years younger for five years older? Did they get her mixed up with someone else?
@anjo2932 Жыл бұрын
Fact remains that WW2 was a self -afflicted injury. Punishing Germany for WW 1 whilst it was suffering a famine and taking everything of value that they had. Had the treaty of Versaille been a little more lenient , than WW2 would have never happened and we have not have heard of Mr A Hitler, When are we going to learn from the lessons we should have learnt from history?
@Genevois12052 жыл бұрын
Interesting story about how the relationship between the Prince of Wales and Wallis Simpson came to be... Lady Furness née Thelma Morgan (whose name was actually pronounced 'Telma', with the 'h' silent), was the twin sister of Gloria Morgan Vanderbilt, widow of Reginald Claypoole Vanderbilt and mother of 'Little Gloria', who would become famous in her own right as an actress, model, fashion designer, painter, author, businesswoman, and of course, as the mother of Anderson Cooper. Gloria Morgan Vanderbilt and her sister in law Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney were locked in a custody battle over Little Gloria that would eventually be adjudicated in a New York City courtroom in what was then called the 'Trial of the Century'. As the trial was set to begin, Lady Furness decided to go to New York City to serve as moral support for her twin sister. Before leaving, she asked her best friend at the time to look after her 'Little Man' while she was away. That man of course was the Prince of Wales, and her best friend was Wallis Simpson. Lady Furness never saw her 'Little Man' again after this.
@anderander56622 жыл бұрын
Sounds like that old song Tennessee Waltz
@romanovobsessed33472 жыл бұрын
Kate looks more beautiful every time i see her. Cant say i ever really envied the royal family's guilded cage but if i was thrown katy as a refreshment i could be persuaded.
@simonsimon28882 жыл бұрын
'Geography+History' what a best pair of subjects knowing the civilizations and cultures of the world from 'William & Kate'
@williammurray99452 жыл бұрын
Is there ever a time that the UK isn't experiencing financial crisis, I mean everytime a royal wedding or jubilee comes about, it is described that the nation is in financial collapse!!!
@gingernightmare91522 жыл бұрын
Between excessive immigration and privatisation we are snowballing to depression.
@1down4up782 жыл бұрын
Poor Guy, the releasing of those classified documents let out the secrecy he most likely took to the grave. He almost got away with it.
@anderander56622 жыл бұрын
If Madonna thinks it's the "greatest romance of the 20th century" I will think the opposite.
@rosequartz41022 жыл бұрын
I'm inclined to agree with you as I find Madonna to have been a pathetic, crude, and tasteless attention grabber for decades.... But I do like William and Kate an awful lot.⚖️
@Zemzabbers2 жыл бұрын
SAME
@terrybardy28482 жыл бұрын
Queen Elizabeth the Second and Prince Philip also George VI and Elizabeth puts Madonna to shame!
@glen73189 ай бұрын
@@terrybardy2848 what possible comparisons can you make between Madonna and the RF?
@ivyroses43802 жыл бұрын
A whole 37 minutes she visited....... wow!
@skyjust8282 жыл бұрын
The papers about Mrs Simpson (Wales) were put out "early" because the Queen Mother Elizabeth wouldn't have any more news about (former?) King Edward 8 unless ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY!
@Jag-alskar-dig2 жыл бұрын
Sky Just - sure wish they had the same guts to do this today with a duo we know that lives in California. No news unless ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.
@glen731811 ай бұрын
news will come out, if a TV station or paper wishes to run the story@@Jag-alskar-dig
@randomvintagefilm2732 жыл бұрын
Greatest love story my American ass. He was a fool and history has just repeated itself with one exception; this time it was the spare and not the heir!
@teresa-2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely so proud of what you can see
@taniagarciaduenas482 жыл бұрын
😢😢 sonno stuffa in panna per tutto ciò che sta succedendo non sopporto tale durezza in il cuore del uomo 😢🌏
@garymeise6732 жыл бұрын
Ah what I do like about this video is there are several things I learned that I didn't know. Which is amazing considering how much I know almost everything about the British monarchy because I'm obsessed with it. What I hate about this video is that it obscures Elizabeth II. Basically the greatest British monarch ever possibly if one considers everything about what she has continued to keep the British throne alive during the most revolutionary time in the history of the world. How is it that this whole documentary actually avoids Elizabeth when she should be the very center of the last hundred years like
@adoreslaurel2 жыл бұрын
My mother named her pet cat "Wally Windsor",probably one of many cats in that period carrying that name.
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
why?
@francesbernard24452 жыл бұрын
This story about the royals has only left me wondering how many married men back then were while often pretending to be single were having affairs with divorced women and how many of those married men having affairs were at the same time 'helping' to bring up the late prince Edward while he was a pre-teen, teenager and young military recruit too.
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
what are you on about
@cocoaddams45022 жыл бұрын
It wasn't "back then" Frances. Prince Chuck asked Diana if she expected him to be the only prince who wasn't allowed a mistres. Of course, he's a self-absorbed man-baby with a mother comples, and Diana wasn't nearly old enough -- but there you go.
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
@@cocoaddams4502 where did he tell Diana he was not going to be the only prince without a mistress?
@cocoaddams45022 жыл бұрын
@@glen7318 I'm not doing your research for you, Glen. Along those lines, though, Prince Chuck has been buying up jewelry belonging to to Mrs. Keppel and giving them to the Rottweiler..
@bernadettespeakman3552 жыл бұрын
@@cocoaddams4502 Proof please. You cannot spout idiotic statements without citing sources. I see that you arent of the calibre of Mr Bower who cites all sources in his volume one book, but repeating gossip without substantiating it is just gossip. I am sure that you are aware of this and not just repeating something you have read on these channels. 🇬🇧👍
@janelle2562 жыл бұрын
For the name of Love not money.. 😢
@crashers172 жыл бұрын
Wallis wasn't older than David. She was 2 years younger. If your gonna be a channel that makes videos,about the royals,you should know that. David born in 1894, Wallis in 1896....
@iLoveBoysandBerries2 жыл бұрын
Uh no
@crashers172 жыл бұрын
@@iLoveBoysandBerries oh no righty oh!
@israelizzyyarrashamiaak7662 жыл бұрын
@@iLoveBoysandBerries Wallis was born 6/19/1896 Edward June 23 1894. Quite literally 2 years her senior. Weird to even type 1890s when it’s 2022!
@suzannereilman45162 жыл бұрын
…IMO, someone had better chat either the fact checker the narrator or both…… At about 6:07, it states that Edward was 36 years old and Wallis 41 years old. I do not know how this is possible when every reference I have seen/read has them both born in the month of June, she in 1896, he in 1894… Some thing isn’t adding up correctly??… …
@cassandraleighr2 жыл бұрын
I happened to find this when Wills was trending on tiktok and Twitter for something quite different than this presents him. And I'll never not think of this
@BarbaraJoanneBJ Жыл бұрын
The narrator HAS to be the actress who played Rosamunde on “Downton Abbey “. Am I right?
@Lilygirl283 Жыл бұрын
Yes you are...
@gvicze Жыл бұрын
Yes, it is Samantha Bond.
@carolynmorrow97742 жыл бұрын
Watching from Ohio USA 🇺🇸
@Queen_D7778 ай бұрын
No comment ❤❤❤
@maryannewebster41002 жыл бұрын
Hi everyone its Maryanne here I live in the UK England and these people who do history and things like that they need to remember that our beloved majesty the Queen her poor wonderful father did have a speach problem he had a stutter and he actually went through speach theropey for it to that's why he found doing speaking on the radio or to a crowd of people xxxxx rest in peace rest peacefully in our Lords loving arms xxxxxxx😇👼🏼🙏🙏😇👼🏼🙏🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇳🇬🏴💖🌹💐🇮🇪🐎🐎🐎🐕🐕🐕🐾🐾🐾🦢🦢🕊🕊👑👑👑👑👑
@glen7318 Жыл бұрын
what are you on about
@valhipkiss40112 жыл бұрын
It’s a pity , Harry , & the wife didn’t go out of the royal family this way, instead of abusing them all .
@keemafarrow28932 жыл бұрын
Bye Felicia, they abused Harry and Megan.
@BoudiccasGhost2 жыл бұрын
What? Oof-- Be more obvious, why don't you 🙄
@valhipkiss40112 жыл бұрын
@@BoudiccasGhost WHAT !!!
@jamesjackson-df1hi2 жыл бұрын
THERE IS SOMETHING BEHIND HARRYS REASONS FOR SHUNNING THIS FAMILY, HE KNOWS SOMETHING FOR SURE WHICH WILL ALL BE REVEALED IN HIS TELL ALL BOOK.
@isabellind12922 жыл бұрын
He's a hypocritical backstabber and the one whose gone on record as being a racist for which the Palace had to apologize for even though he was a grown ass adult and should have made his own damn apologizes for his racist behavior which he shouldn't have done in the first place as a grown ass adult! What a wuss!
@iamkj20082 жыл бұрын
When the heir is more popular than the monarch himself:
@maryannewebster41002 жыл бұрын
Hi everyone its Maryanne here dose it matter he was in love with our beloved majesty the Queen Elizabeth 11 her mother she was a very beautiful woman and if they never had been married we wouldn't have had our beloved majesty the Queen Elizabeth 11 and princess Margaret thank you you both for letting us all love your beautiful daughters rest in peace all of you rest peacefully in our Lords loving arms in heaven and jesus to we all miss you all so so much and because I'm a very religious girl myself i know that we all will be with them one day we will meet again one day❤ xxxx🐾🐾🐾🐎🐎🐎🐕🐕🐕🐕🐎🙏🙏🙏🙏👼🏼😇🌹🌹🌹💐💐💐🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🏴🏴🏴🇳🇬🇮🇪🇮🇪🕊🕊🦢🦢💖
@mashtali12 жыл бұрын
King Edward story is incredibly beautiful. every time it brings tears to my eyes.
@peggykelly50192 жыл бұрын
Surely you jest. This version of the story is quite far from the truth.
@anderander56622 жыл бұрын
King Edward was not the sharpest tool in the box
@mashtali12 жыл бұрын
I was talking about his love story. do you understand English?
@peggykelly50192 жыл бұрын
@@mashtali1 Yes, and it's all a fairy tale.
@nihilisticbarbie2 жыл бұрын
@@mashtali1 Wallis didn't love him, she was backed into a corner to marry him
@gayleboykin94992 жыл бұрын
There seems to be similarities between Megan & Wallis, as well as Harry & Edward.
@nickyjones27092 жыл бұрын
Oh yes, history repeating itself!
@taniquebrown31032 жыл бұрын
Charles and Princess Diana same story different years and decades but very similar
@maryh95692 жыл бұрын
William and Kate remind me of Charles and Camilla, same old soup ,Just warmed over again, With Rose ,the new Camilla,So maybe your right,
@Rosemary-vf5ei4 ай бұрын
@@maryh9569 The "Rose" story is fake. The moron who made it up, Giles Coren, confessed to making it up and retracted. If the story were true, do you think Catherine's sister would have named her daughter Rose? Google Giles Coren.
@shellyreena21922 жыл бұрын
Time capsules is what I find in random videos on utube. This is one of them. Almost 4got about koo stark. Amazing how some individuals think it's difficult to live on 30,000.00 a yr, tax free with no rent and kids taken care of, or 100,000.00 a yr not paying for anything. Besides the history here it's a reminding wake up call to the overly entitled. And yea I just like the history :))
@FarhiaismailMohamud-z4y2 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ royal family love you
@hestergreen20312 жыл бұрын
Prince Edward was quite a play boy. Always playing around. Edward had no interest in becoming King of England. He was having too much fun. Fun doing nothing . Wallace wanted fame. And thought getting close to Edward was the answer. Wallace never loved or cared for Edward it was all pretense to get her a change of life.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
Her life would be very different if she was his mistress. That was the point, being married to their lovers and seeing someone on the side. The wickedness of these people is evil as hell. I don’t think King Edward VIII wanted to play, he wanted to changed the way of that era and society was not ready, there was no way he was going to get married to Simpson. He was a fool to not married any other woman and keeping her as mistress. I am sure he was going to meet another married woman move on from Simpson. At that time, politically, out side forces didn’t wanted him to be king anyways, he wasn’t a Hittler sympathizer, he was a socialist sympathizer, very dangerous for that time. Historians don’t speak about how his idea of monarchy was way different from what was going on at that time, he wanted to help people. He was a mixture of playboy with a sincere interest in his subjects lives.
@chrispeppers88952 жыл бұрын
A common social climber.
@Oughut88 Жыл бұрын
The Duke of Windsor was attractive as was King George 6th. None of the males in the Spencer family are attractive. King Charles may not be traditionally attractive but when you meet him he is so, so charming, so kind and interested one can’t help be taken with him. He is extremely charismatic.
@annethomas93022 жыл бұрын
We are all wiser after the event…. Really it is about oneself.
@zillahwanogho66312 жыл бұрын
Prince William's a lovely simple easy going guy who does't appreciate his mother's name been so to speak expoilted by individuals through the media. William's mother's not here to defend herself.
@glen73182 жыл бұрын
william is not at all simple or easy going. he is stern, has a temper and is tough.
@chrispapa27822 жыл бұрын
She didn’t love Edward. She was pretending all along.
@purdygirlxo2 жыл бұрын
HE .was NOT a SHE..
@soniamariaalvesdemelo65452 жыл бұрын
Even IF THEY stayed in England as long qnd Queen THEY would not have any kids so Queen Elizabeth would still be QUEEN eventually.
@LynnRPerry2 жыл бұрын
These two love birds were miserable and they both regretted the decision. It was not a life long love story.
@glen73189 ай бұрын
i doubt if either of them really regretted it. They had an empty life but they were rich and had each other.
@zephheine96812 жыл бұрын
he did..reak king 👊🧡
@pfranks752 жыл бұрын
How a mistress changes to a wife is complicated when a person is a royal. Prince Charles has been blessed having a long lived monarch mother. There really not much of a comparison between Albert and Charles. Despite his shortcomings Prince Charles is an intelligent man.
@mypointofview11112 жыл бұрын
So intelligent he advocates ground coffee enemas for people with cancer. Sadly there are enough stupid people who actually follow this and pay with their lives, not that it bothers Charles as he can't be charged with any criminal wrongdoing unlike the rest of us
@BlackStump1722 жыл бұрын
@@mypointofview1111 Charles is not very intelligent. He has been educated though , but is still a bit dim and is very egocentric .
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
His uncle was a fool, and not smart at all. I don’t think Charles is that intelligent, but he sure had follow most of the advices given to him by the intelligent people in charge of caring for him. I grew to admired him with his crazy love for Camilla. Another point, he could’ve had very well being nice to Diana and enjoyed both worlds, like his uncle, he played a fool. He decided that he was not going to do that, almost like he was a loyal man, he wasn’t, he was just a spoiled man, that would not have a more beautiful and loved wife than him to his subjects. He could not stand Diana’s popularity.
@sharonmoh59052 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098
@cocoaddams45022 жыл бұрын
@@BlackStump172 Intelligent for a royal. That's different than intelligent. If you met him at a party and he wasn't a royal, you'd say he was pompous and dull and full of himself. And he is. He barely passed at Eton.
@BairMendoza2 жыл бұрын
Everything is going according to plan. 👑💖
@yetidodger66502 жыл бұрын
well they've certainly got much much richer.
@neemtreebark2 жыл бұрын
KING CHARLES IS JUST THE OPPOSITE! God Save the King! 👑
@joanmargaret48992 жыл бұрын
Harry was guarded the whole time. They called him, "Bunker Harry."
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
Now he is a lose cannon. The same they would say it about Diana, but Diana was a hard working member of the royals, that wasn’t fair to her, but fits Harry very much.
@joanmargaret48992 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 Considering Diana's severe mental issues that were kept fairly quiet during her lifetime, "lose cannon" was probably putting it mildly. One can work hard and still be unpredictable IMHO.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
@@joanmargaret4899 nope, people knew she was mental, that's why they thought they could make her to killed herself, but after having the children, not before.
@lindakienle5312 жыл бұрын
Thank you. This nonsense of how great Harry was is insane. Even his mother, Princess Diana admitted Harry had issues but they all coddled him and fed his ego and reinforced to him how great he was, even today. William and Andrew were true working military personnel. 👏 not Harry.
@isabellind12922 жыл бұрын
Poor little victim! As far as I've heard the reasons he's maligned his entire family was over what he accused one (anonymous) family member of when he claimed they'd made a racist remark and then went on to throw his own mother under the bus along w/the rest of his family when he trashed his upbringing even though his mom played an integral role during his formative years. And he's the one whose gone on record behaving & making racist remarks so for him to pretend he's a pure as the driven snow is about as hypocritical a backstabber as it gets. He and his wife are attention seeking narcissists who've gone on to make a career out of being the town criers so they can announce how terrible it is every time something terrible comes down the pike because they'll do anything to keep their names out there.
@jewelspearls3752 Жыл бұрын
In a decree in 1701, members of the royal family were not permitted to enter into marriage with Roman Catholics . 1* The monarch of the family is the de facto head of the Church of England, which is Protestant in nature. 2* Throughout history, this prohibition led to many disruptions in the line of succession and validities of marriage, such as that of King George IV to the Catholic Maria Fitzherbert, which wasn’t recognised. 3* The marriage of King Edward to Wallis Simpson is another case to recall 4* As the British monarch, Edward was the nominal head of the Church of England, which at this time did not allow divorced people to remarry in church if their Ex-Spouses were still alive. 5* For this reason, it was widely believed that Edward could not marry Simpson and remain on the throne 6* Early life and education. Tom Parker Bowles was born on 18 December 1974 in London. He and his sister Laura were raised as Roman Catholics 7* The Queen Consort s parents went to Holy Trinity Church in Stourpaine, Dorset, and her father and brother Mark Shand' s funeral were held at the same church 8* Children and grandchildren of Parker Bowles and Camelia were brought up in their father's Roman Catholic faith, particularly during the lifetime of their paternal grandmother Ann Parker Bowles; Wikipedia 8* How is it Camilla remained an Anglican when she was baptised as Roman Catholic and also raised her children as Roman Catholics 9* Are Children of Roman Catholic parents baptised before they are a yr old ? 10* Therefore Mr and Mrs Shand as parents of baby Camelia Shand baptised their daughter as a Roman Catholic 11* When one is baptised as a Roman Catholic at birth can you at some age in a later part of life switch to Protestant because you choose to divorce the Roman Catholic husband , Parker Bowles to marry a Royal Prince who is an Anglican . 12**Queen of England to be crowned is very Catholic even though she prefers to belong to the Angelican Faith Unless she attended a special Church Ceremony to convert into the Anglican Faith after her divorce from Andrew Parker Bowles Her entourage as siblings and ex husband's family ,children, grandchildren her late parent ,late brother and all other family members are or were Roman Catholics en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki Camilla, Queen Consort - Wikipedia Google search One instance in which the Anglican Church forbids a second church wedding for divorced persons is if the new relationship contributed to the breakdown of the first marriage, Ed Condon, a Catholic canon lawyer in the U.K., told CNA. 12* This was what prevented a church wedding for Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles in 2005. (Google /Wiki) 13* "The opposition to Edward VIII was, first of all, that society didn't recognize divorce as something that was good at the time, and now it does, unfortunately," he said Royals marrying Catholics 14* owever, if she were a Catholic, this too would have been an obstacle to her marrying into the royal family until very recently. 15**Opposition to Catholics ascending to the throne dates back to King Henry VIII, who broke from the Catholic Church in the 1500s in order to divorce his wife, Catherine of Aragon, and marry another, because he blamed Catherine for failing to produce a son who could succeed to the throne. 16* The Succession to the Crown Act 2013 allowed heirs to the throne to marry Catholics, among other changes. However, the law still stipulates that the acting British sovereign mustn't be a Catholic. 17* For this Long awaited Coronation many rules and traditions may be shelved. They may allow family members including children and grandchildren of her ex husband though Roman Catholics and commoners to participate in the Coronation event itself 18* Will the Government of Great Britain and Archbishops have to explain to taxpayers ,why were the strict royal regulations not exercised ?? 19* Taxpayers have a right to know as it depletes the Government's Budget on welfare and we'll being of the citizens of the country .
@samsmom4002 жыл бұрын
"Lesser mortals could only dream of"??? Who do you think you are?
@beverlynBarnes7 ай бұрын
Rest😢🎉❤
@dr.calebrobbins.31772 жыл бұрын
Documents at Windsor cite The Archbishop of Canterbury & PM Stanley Baldwin were more than complicit in the Abdication. Had it been the situation now what would they have done about the behaviour of the current POW & his Mistress/ wife. When looking at History it is more than useful to do so through the cultural lens of that era. Not that that in any way excuses explains nor justifies the behaviours of The Royal Family and the current POW Charles.
@hmtqnikitashakur33992 жыл бұрын
you're supposed to be a Dr??? I would *highly* doubt that...... you're impartiality knows ZERO bounds. Long live Prince Charles (King Charles III) hahahahhahaahahaha
@lornaparsons97672 жыл бұрын
@@hmtqnikitashakur3399 and his precious supportive, loving wife consort QUEEN CAMILLIA👍👌👏
@janiceleighton7348 Жыл бұрын
But David was not bothered about that he loved her more than she loved him sadly