We invaded Iraq in HMMWVs with canvass doors. We’d lose 2-3 trucks a week from RPGs, IEDs, or heavy MG fire. We were constantly low on tires, with 2-3 trucks inop at any given point for lack of tires. We’d manage to “procure” (steal) tires from the apron at Al Asad Air Base, only to go out that night and have them get all shot up. We used confiscated money to pay an Iraqi iron worker to fasten doors, floor panels, and ramming bumpers out of 1/4 steel and we did use sandbags as well. We tested the steel and an M4 round would penetrate it, but the AK wouldn’t because of bullet tumble. It was better than the canvass that offered us nothing. We got one up-armored HMMWV about a month before our year long tour was up.
@netuser2583 жыл бұрын
At least you had doors lol. We used to take them out to be "faster" at getting out of the vehicle and to point our weapons anywhere while seated.
@jont25763 жыл бұрын
Should have just switched to Toyota hyflux.indestructible and millions of spare parts lieing around. U mean to tell me America spent 110 billion a year on a not even a real war,and they didn't have the logistics and supply to maintain and refit their equipment? Or replace all their equipment.where exactly did the 10 billion a month for more than 15 years go? 10 billion a month to maintain a 50,000 strong army.thats $200,000 per soldier per month spending. Can u imagine if Isis had that kind of funding? I mean u think about it 110 billion a year is literally the GDP of Iraq, Instead of bombs u might as well just airdrop pallets of money everyday from c130 Globemasters,at least the Iraqis would prosper and their economy would boom. Iraq and Afghanistan might become wealthy and prosperous and they might even stopped fighting each other.....notice how rich countries are seldom at war because they have a stake and interest in the country and want to protect their assets and property?they are less likely to pick up arms and form terrorists groups?
@Alfred.E.Newman3 жыл бұрын
should of been in the iconic willy jeep in vietnam at least you had doors !!! semper fi
@usgator3 жыл бұрын
@@Alfred.E.Newman we often took them off for raids. We’d drive the truck through the compounds front doors and then dismount and stack up for entry.
@therickibobby48653 жыл бұрын
Today, yall lost to the Taliban after all that money poored into the war lol
@enceladus22633 жыл бұрын
Step 1: Give your humvees to the Taliban Step 2: Ask congress for money
@JemRau3 жыл бұрын
Step 3: Also give Taliban MRAPs Step 4: Also give them sausages 😆
@freelanserns1873 жыл бұрын
Step 5. Also give the Taliban your drones and helicopters Step 6 pray to God that they don't use those drones and helicopters against you
@StreamSonic3 жыл бұрын
PLOT TWIST: Taliban selling it to China in exchange for cashes.
@ahnaf29713 жыл бұрын
@@StreamSonic @ china has far better drones than those which were left in Afg for the Afg Army (Scan eagle)... You can say Iranians got the real Big deal drone when they hacked & landed one of the USA drone on their Runway safely & then Barak Obama was asking Iranians to please handover our drone 😂 but it was top notch drone at that time (not really an elite type but it was secretive & important piece of hardware at that time),, technology is moving really fast & it's outdated by today's standard so it's not anymore an important hardware but it will do the job for Iranians, they already reversed engineered that drone but to what extent, I'm not sure Abt that...
@mrghost_gaming28453 жыл бұрын
@@StreamSonic conspiracy theorist🗿
@donarrivas16753 жыл бұрын
The humvees have been in the army museum already. They have been replaced by the GD made Cougar HH 4x4, which are now used on streets in Kandahar by the talibans.
@mps283 жыл бұрын
😄😄
@sammiller5523 жыл бұрын
Just saw the taliban riding into Kabul on those $220,000 old humvees
@Stroporez3 жыл бұрын
It's Taliban fighters or talibs. It is generally good idea to know who one is supposed to fight.
@joestockton70163 жыл бұрын
@@Stroporez It's actually Talibanannis or Talibanananis
@WiseSilverWolf3 жыл бұрын
@@sammiller552 The Taliban drive more expensive vehicles than most Americans now lol, your average American doesnt own a $220k vehicle.
@akshayh9413 жыл бұрын
It's funny how they talk about Iraq and Afghanistan when all they did was send a lot of money down the drain while Patriotic and heroic soldiers Laid thier lives for nothing
@afghanistancitizen61753 жыл бұрын
This wouldn’t have happened if that potato of a leader hadn’t withdrew military personnel BEFORE Americans and civilians and hadn’t surrendered a base with a landing strip to the Taliban. Now there’s only one base. God help all of those people 🙏 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@taylorbug93 жыл бұрын
What is patriotic about falling for a lie and destroying another country to enrich evil people?
@SanPot1233 жыл бұрын
@@taylorbug9 was 9/11 a lie? Osama bin Laden a lie?
@taylorbug93 жыл бұрын
@@SanPot123 it happened but not the way they said it did. You're pretty dumb if you believe the official story.
@memex32563 жыл бұрын
@@taylorbug9 so actually us sold their weapons to taliban so that later their soldier die with same weapons gotcha
@jangosavdjdubsak10793 жыл бұрын
By leaving the older versions of the Humvees to the Taliban…
@Jonathan-ir7qf3 жыл бұрын
It's free real estate
@juanmanuelpenaloza92643 жыл бұрын
Nah, they'll still use Toyota pickup trucks.
@kailoo32563 жыл бұрын
@@juanmanuelpenaloza9264 nope
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
They should buy the Turkish armed Vehicle called 'Ejder Yalcin" or "Kirpi" or "FSNN", FSNN even protects you from Chemical attacks. google them you will see why?
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@whatabouttheearth3 жыл бұрын
"you can be drinking a cup of coffee going over massive bumps and not spill" 😂 apparently the congressman wasn't being driven by the Lance Corporal Underground or Specialist Mafia
@fullweezy35533 жыл бұрын
The E4 mafia stays undefeated
@notacreativehandle3 жыл бұрын
Literally the BEST comment 🙌🏽
@jamesg5123 жыл бұрын
I was like "a cup of coffee my a$$". We jacked these up in Afghanistan on their "roads".
@Daniel-vq2jg3 жыл бұрын
@@jamesg512 tf. How come I can drive over two foot deep potholes in the jltv without feeling a thing?
@jamesg5123 жыл бұрын
@@Daniel-vq2jg I drove through IED blast holes that blocked portions of roads during complex attacks. Different circumstances I guess. Plus it depends on what models. I drove MAXXPros and MATVs in RC East
@nelsondisalvatore98123 жыл бұрын
There are gonna be a LOT of humvees for the cheap.
@LeeeroyJenkins3 жыл бұрын
They break down to much. Only security companies and other mid-high tier companies will be able to get them.
@rwhunt993 жыл бұрын
They are everywhere, people are snapping them up as they go up for auction. I wouldn't recommend people to buy one, they are expensive to maintain, and as noted there isn't much room inside for such a big vehicle, but if they are running, you can't stop them.
@swatteam20023 жыл бұрын
@@rwhunt99 engine swap would be a solution
@rwhunt993 жыл бұрын
@@swatteam2002 It involves more than an engine, which is a general motors diesel, that is a fuel hog, but the half shafts break constantly, the tires wear quickly, very noisy with a fan than just screams when it kicks on. It is cramped and not your normal beater. That said, a lot of people absolutely love them.
@dandaman49853 жыл бұрын
Replacing a fleet of hummers, step 1: leave them overseas to be used by the locals.
@cocobrez3 жыл бұрын
They should just contact Toyota, I swear every vehicle that I see in modern-day war is a Toyota!
@iKingRPG3 жыл бұрын
I think they only want to use American companies
@IonorReasSpamGenerator3 жыл бұрын
@@iKingRPG One big IED turns your beloved Toyota into a Space Shuttle. I heard that Russians bought some civilian cars for their version of home guards, but that's because they are low on cash and in need of crossing long distances..
@@gavcom4060 Nah, he’s not joking. The Russians are broke from corruption
@tongascopetongaisango86913 жыл бұрын
South Africa has decades old experience with this type of military vehicles, look up the Hippo APC
@mistersquirrel03 жыл бұрын
Just buy Toyota Hilux. They're indestructible, Top Gear proved it.
@slowgoat60893 жыл бұрын
My 99 corolla has 436k miles right now and still runs, just burns lots of oil
@dwaneanderson80393 жыл бұрын
Did they try shooting it with rifles?
@anishadamane41793 жыл бұрын
@@dwaneanderson8039 They dropped it from a building, drowned it in a sea, burnt it, drove inside a house, kept it on a building which got demolished
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
They should buy the Turkish armed Vehicle called 'Ejder Yalcin" or "Kirpi" or "FSNN", FSNN even protects you from Chemical attacks. google them you will see why?
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@TruckerJacket3 жыл бұрын
Osh Kosh defence, classic - I used to wear their denim overalls as a 4 year old
@stant71223 жыл бұрын
is it the same company?? lol. a friend of mine used to be a cashier at their store. maybe she was also trained military manufacturing.
@dragon.fromindia32353 жыл бұрын
GOD PLEASE DECREASE GOLD PRICE/
@chang10093 жыл бұрын
@@stant7122 Don't think they're the same company. Name is just similar because they come from the same town, OshKosh, WI.
@TruckerJacket3 жыл бұрын
@@stant7122 Must be, I underestimated how well engineered those overalls were
@RobertoGonzalez-my8um3 жыл бұрын
that was my 2 year old style!!!!
@georgeday87163 жыл бұрын
I rode in MRAP for my Afghanistan deployment. They felt heavy as fk, and it elicited confidence. We knew we would still get blown to hell by stolen ambulances laden with explosives (which seemed like every other day according to Intel), but we felt impervious to the every day Toyota Corolla. We once had a platoon take a vbid from a Corolla. Everyone walked away unharmed, minus the LT who got stabbed by a bystander while waiting for Quick Reaction Force. We used to drive the MRAP over concrete highway barriers to go against traffic to monitor threat level. I hope our current guys have the same capability out of the newer vehicles in the race to build a cheaper alternative.
@deepbludude46973 жыл бұрын
yep the most BOLO vehicle in ME the vulnerable Corolla!
Two trillion twenty years and 12k US lives and we barely made it out of the sandbox & Afghanistan has another empire in its graveyard. We shot ourselves in the foot thinking these people ever even wanted us there to begin with
@snmailist14703 жыл бұрын
Heavily armour vehicle scrubs with Toyota Hilux. What a pride of tax payers 😂😂😂😂
@HKim00723 жыл бұрын
Note: Osk Kosh is based out of WI and the US Rep is from WI. Nothing wrong for stumping for your constituents, but there is a vested interest.
@derpmansderpyskin3 жыл бұрын
@@killdizzle It's more about securing jobs for your constituents. The factories are strategically located around the country, to maximize the number of constituencies with economies relying on the defense industry. That means that a vote against defense spending is a vote to close down the plant in your district, and a surefire way to get booted out of office.
@Andrew-kz5ew3 жыл бұрын
It can also simultaneously be the best available choice. Don’t make assumptions without evidence. Is there evidence this was chosen despite there being more cost effective/better performance vehicles being offered?
@WycliffStudios3 жыл бұрын
The Democrats just gave like 200-300 Humvees to The Taliban including MRAPS. They also gave away thousands of Military Firearms, multiple Cessna transport planes, Helicopters, and even a C130. Now they want the taxpayers to fund another useless piece of Junk. Russian weapons are almost 1/10th the cost and are more effective than what Oshkosh/ Lockheed/ Boeing and Northrop Grumman are able to make.
@thespectator52593 жыл бұрын
@@WycliffStudios I wouldn't say Russian weapons are "more effective" in all or even most aspects. They are certainly cheaper though...
@WycliffStudios3 жыл бұрын
@@thespectator5259 S400 is better than any US SAM
@GUSCi-BDE3 жыл бұрын
Nobody: A Toyota Landcruiser somewhere: that's cute
@sc13383 жыл бұрын
Yea, because that’s relevant lol 😂
@dohminkonoha32003 жыл бұрын
That’s comfortable in middle of desert.
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
They should buy the Turkish armed Vehicle called 'Ejder Yalcin" or "Kirpi" or "FSNN", FSNN even protects you from Chemical attacks. google them you will see why?
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@helloworld9633 жыл бұрын
@@007supertime USA is definitely not very friendly with Turkey for past few years.
@cbjueueiwyru74723 жыл бұрын
Citizens: "we need some kids clothes" Oshkosh: "I got you fam" Citizens: "military needs a new combat vehicle" Oshkosh: "I got you fam"
@rcordh56573 жыл бұрын
that exactly i was thinking when watching this video i was like "wait, isn't oshkosh is a baby clothes brand? i remember buying for my nephew couple months ago"
@sarminder43573 жыл бұрын
@@rcordh5657 That's OshKosh B'gosh. This is Oshkosh Corporation
@JustAGooseman3 жыл бұрын
@@sarminder4357 Formerly Oshkosh Corporation, they rebranded (again for the 4th time) to Oshkosh Defense in 2019 or 2020.
@wickedbizcuit39033 жыл бұрын
@@JustAGooseman Oshkosh defense is a subsidiary of Oshkosh corporation.
@willwarren71773 жыл бұрын
My unit replaced all our Humvees with JLTVs. I drive them all the time and I can say they are very cool looking inside and outside and they are awesome but biggest problem I have with it is driving it. The steering wheel is very sticky and has like no power steering.
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@kosh96393 жыл бұрын
It's probably the 4wd system... :/
@jsturm2223 жыл бұрын
@@chocolat-kun8689 yes
@Justowner3 жыл бұрын
@@chocolat-kun8689 Its one of those ironies of scale, the more of a thing you buy, the cheaper they get per unit, but the bigger your final price is anyways. Also If a car AC is $100 but you need 5 Million of them for your army trucks then you are paying $500mil just so guys stop whining about AC.
@cannibalclown2123 жыл бұрын
I loved driving the JLTVs. The only issues they have are electrical problems and sometimes suspension.
@bilalsyed85503 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's high time to upgrade. Even the Taliban possess the Humvees now.
@snmailist14703 жыл бұрын
Well, Taliban, now, can offer US army to use it for daily combat. 😂😂😂😂
@JIMSCREECHIE8763 жыл бұрын
I've been all over in these thing, they're overpriced, extremely loud and large. However as large as it is, there still isnt much room inside. Something seriously needs to be done about how contracts are awarded.
@_sunfish3 жыл бұрын
You are not extremely smart, it's called protection...
@rwhunt993 жыл бұрын
Buy yourself a cadillac. HUMVEEs have been one of the most successful programs in military history, much maligned for doing things they were never designed for, but tough and got a lot of troops back in one piece after being all shot up. We have a complete wall in the plant covered with letters from soldiers and their families thanking the workers for getting their sons and daughters home safely. The workers had their own sons and daughters over there in Iraq and Afghanistan so they were more than concerned about providing them the best built truck they could. Were they the perfect truck - of course not, but they were pretty damned good compared to anything else that was out there at the time.
@JIMSCREECHIE8763 жыл бұрын
@@rwhunt99 You're not even on topic in regards to my original post, with that said the HMMWV sucks too however at its price and age of the platform its understandable.
@sfcrmsa3 жыл бұрын
@@rwhunt99 Agreed 100%. The job that that HUMVEE was actually designed to do, it did that job very well.
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
They should buy the Turkish armed Vehicle called 'Ejder Yalcin" or "Kirpi" or "FSNN", FSNN even protects you from Chemical attacks. google them you will see why?
@murc1113 жыл бұрын
The JLTV's are awesome, I've seen one in person, and they are WAAAY better then the Humvee's they are replacing. The air suspension which can adjust your ride height was one of the cooler features.
@gregorylumban-gaol38893 жыл бұрын
They look cool…in the right hands. I’m staring at you Saudi Arabia. Ya’ll got shat on by Yemeni chads.
@jeffersongarcia82573 жыл бұрын
They look great but are a pain in the ass to work on. And constantly break down.
@hansschmitt23703 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised that the Humvee lasted so long . I test drove it for the USMC back in the early 1980s and I was very disappointed with it's performance .
@jmmorante75763 жыл бұрын
how so?
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
They should buy the Turkish armed Vehicle called 'Ejder Yalcin" or "Kirpi" or "FSNN", FSNN even protects you from Chemical attacks. google them you will see why?
@FourFront993 жыл бұрын
I drove it for 8 years, and was never disappointed.
@Dandan-vf9kr3 жыл бұрын
@s Rush I don't know anyone that finds Crayon jokes funny
@harrisn36933 жыл бұрын
@@Dandan-vf9kr you should put ointment on that burn yankee
@AaronMichaelLong3 жыл бұрын
I have a great strategy for making much more effective IED protection for serving U.S. servicemen: Keep them at home. The truth is, there's no level of armor or armament that's going to protect a wheeled vehicle from an explosive boobytrap, and pretending that IEDs are an engineering problem instead of a political one is just another classic example of the obtuseness of policymakers, or at least the obtuseness of their PR. The truth is, no matter where you spend money trying to protect servicemen from harm, insurgents and terrorists are going to just look for the next weak link in your defensive posture. Instead, we should be building armed forces designed to protect our own territory, not occupy the territory of places we have no business trying to govern. This strategic stupidity is costing American taxpayers trillions of dollars, as mission creep driven by stupid policy decisions turns what was once a $14,000 utility vehicle (the original 1941 jeep, adjusted for inflation) into a $400,000 boondoggle.
@djp12343 жыл бұрын
They need a drone vehicle to drive a few miles ahead and set off any explosives.
@nox_chan3 жыл бұрын
Good idea but believe it or not the middle of convoys were being targeted at one point not necessarily the lead vehicle
@djp12343 жыл бұрын
@@nox_chan that’s why the drone vehicle should be a few miles ahead.
@karozans3 жыл бұрын
They have them. Or at least they used to. If you are talking about machines to set off buried mines and explosives. They don't use them very often it seems.
@JustAGooseman3 жыл бұрын
@@djp1234 most IEDs are remotely detonated so that would not work lol
@davidc28383 жыл бұрын
@@karozans He's talking about an unmanned Humvee...so it looks like a target...not just an engineer battalions mine removal equip.
@chrischris48273 жыл бұрын
Will it have more than one reverse gear? To be more in line with the current military strategy.
@kosh96393 жыл бұрын
The need to get out of Trouble-- quicker than, they got into it... xD (Oddball-- Kelly's Hero's) kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpWYmmmer9p_o7c
@sambotros19183 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGHUiaGdiJeffqM
@obviousness81133 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂🙂👍
@adamfrbs92593 жыл бұрын
*The French have entered the chat now
@bigfatstupidfish23973 жыл бұрын
@@adamfrbs9259 hahahaha I once bought a ww2 French rifle. It was listed as "dropped once, never fired"
@DarthVader9643 жыл бұрын
Whoever makes these videos needs a raise. Also, do not let them go.
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@sambotros19183 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGHUiaGdiJeffqM
@adamantlyadam52013 жыл бұрын
I've been in the Army for ten years and had never seen or even heard of the JLTVs until one year ago when I returned from deployment and saw them everywhere on Fort Hood. It was crazy.
@IvanGoldBit3 жыл бұрын
6:45 yeah Nmesis does carry a rocket launcher :) creative guys on the team 🤣
@MrOiram463 жыл бұрын
lmao Nemesis might as well be a JLTV with all the damage he can take
@1timerod3 жыл бұрын
Now it makes sense why they left all the Humvees in Afghanistan for the Taliban😂
@Jack220003 жыл бұрын
They didnt leave them for the Taliban. They left for the afgan troops and you can see how coward some are and just handled all supplies to the Taliban for their use.
@MarloSoBalJr3 жыл бұрын
@@Jack22000 I think you missed the obvious joke he was making
@SnoopReddogg3 жыл бұрын
The military version of the classic Jewish stocktake
@1pyroace13 жыл бұрын
@@MarloSoBalJr I get it problem is the rhetoric is spreading just to attack a political party but no blame on the Afghan
@WycliffStudios3 жыл бұрын
The Democrats just gave like 200-300 Humvees to The Taliban including MRAPS. They also gave away thousands of Military Firearms, multiple Cessna transport planes, Helicopters, and even a C130. Now they want the taxpayers to fund another useless piece of Junk. Russian weapons are almost 1/10th the cost and are more effective than what Oshkosh/ Lockheed/ Boeing and Northrop Grumman are able to make.
@40blank3 жыл бұрын
Just to clarify, was the $400k per JLTV the total lifetime cost of the vehicle per DOD procurement which includes all the maintenance and spare parts it will ever need, or the cost of each unit without spare parts and maintenance? MotorTrend reported earlier this year that the DOD does vehicle procurement that includes spare parts and maintenance for the lifetime of the vehicle and that is why the per unit cost seems high upon first glance. It would be equivalent to buying a new car, all the spare parts, tires, and oil changes you'll ever need in one transaction.
@ericlane32563 жыл бұрын
Yeah man, vehicles are going to get more expensive as technology advanced. The HMMWV will still be in service for a very long time, but they’re aging, and hardly work as it is now.
@rwhunt993 жыл бұрын
Each contract is different, but some do include a certain number of spare parts and any special tools to fix them along with specific training for mechanics to work on them.
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
They should buy the Turkish armed Vehicle called 'Ejder Yalcin" or "Kirpi" or "FSNN", FSNN even protects you from Chemical attacks. google them you will see why?
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@A_Degenerate_with_Glasses3 жыл бұрын
All of those Turkish vehicles listed either came out a year after the South African inspired US MRAP program was in full production (Which means they just followed suit because the US started doing it) or the US already has something similar decades ago.
@luiswhatshisname76673 жыл бұрын
they should have the H35 project, spend a trillion dollars and then test it to see if it can drive under the rain. It would be a nice F35 companion
@kolinmartz3 жыл бұрын
The light tank from the 1930s?
@luiswhatshisname76673 жыл бұрын
@@kolinmartz Nah, the imaginary companion of the F35 debacle.
@kolinmartz3 жыл бұрын
@@luiswhatshisname7667 yeah I don’t see an h35 anywhere
@outsidejournal88323 жыл бұрын
@@luiswhatshisname7667 😂
@blueflame7123 жыл бұрын
Taliban will love this donation from the US...
@jg50013 жыл бұрын
If they could ever keep the damn things running. HMMWVs in the Motorpool are hardly working at all, and I'm very skeptical a JLTV will work better in the long run.
@seanthe1003 жыл бұрын
@@jg5001 right. I wouldn't be bragging about having HMMWVs they're literally the last vehicles to leave the motor pool if they leave the motor pool. They got what the military does not want or care about.
@flamesofjihad40693 жыл бұрын
Finally an upgrade. We're going to enjoy taking these from you inshallah.
@banditonehundred3 жыл бұрын
"These vehicles are great, thank you Oshkosh" - Taliban
@nonpartisangunowner45243 жыл бұрын
2:10 An important thing to consider is that you could decrease survivability by adding armor, which makes the vehicle slower and less mobile. Hopefully, they’ve learned from the humvee and added cup holders.
@Mooooty3 жыл бұрын
War is Great Business...The Warmongers Profiteer Corporations Love it!
@carlocbian52873 жыл бұрын
Yeah Business and Corporations protects your own interest
@carbonwhy50553 жыл бұрын
This is awesome! Great video
@holdforth7243 жыл бұрын
Nice to see uncle fester developing the military's future arsenal.
@tommymiddlefinger12833 жыл бұрын
All part of the Advanced Design Armament Military System's family.
@jessesteinke38943 жыл бұрын
You mean retired USMC Colonel with 28 years of service…… I’d be interested in comparing resumes between the 2 of you.
@goylanddefree803 жыл бұрын
ain't nothing drive up sales better than accidently giving away 28 billion worth of equipment to the taliban
@infini.tesimo3 жыл бұрын
These things are amazing in North Dakota -69 degree weather. Kept me toasty for midnight shifts staying overnight at nuclear missile silos.
@whatabouttheearth3 жыл бұрын
North Dakota, the land of nukes, T Rex's and Native Americans!
@ronaldbobeck10263 жыл бұрын
Ah AFSC 8115 security policemen, Minute Man security at Ellsworth AFB SD 1971 -72 We had clapped out Dodge power wagons mostly from 1966 -67 . No bathroom facilities on the site , you got one in flight meal and one box of C - rations . We could stay on site 3 days, while the manitance men work on the missile. So yeah.
@ALiberalVeteran3 жыл бұрын
Hell We used LMTVs my whole deployment to the mountains in Afghanistan back in 2011, the mobility was great, took it off-road everywhere
@Buck123four3 жыл бұрын
This will run circles around a LMTV, with a whole lotta armor.
@aardque3 жыл бұрын
Some of us are old enough to remember when the previous iconic workhorse, was replaced by the Hummer.
@numbersasaname22913 жыл бұрын
I was in Germany when 3rd Armored Division got the Humvee. It was too big for German forest roads and was as difficult to hide as an M113 (another proven workhorse that was turn in for a piece of 💩). Corporate reps swarmed our units during FTXs and afterwards in garrison asking for opinions and feedback. Aside from being able to carry more “beans-and-weenies” (slang at the time for commissary-bought snacks, which was frowned upon anyway), no one in my battalion had anything good to say about it. And rightfully so. Too big and too big of a profile, unnecessarily restricting roads and trails it could go, a maintenance nightmare because ONLY the HHC mechanics were authorized to fix ANYTHING on it, and a gas hog (thus requiring a larger log chain and more refueling stops). I’m glad to see it go, but I am worried that it is going to be replaced with a vehicle designed by Pentagon POGs rather than troops (think “The Bradley” as the best example of this). I also worry that the army is moving to a vehicle right for the war-we-just-fought rather than the wars in other terrain that we will fight next. Even at IOBC in 1979, we were still taught how to fight WW2 rather that low intensity conflicts.
@ganonk793 жыл бұрын
What did the Humvee replace? The M151? The Land Rover?
@numbersasaname22913 жыл бұрын
@@ganonk79 the M151
@aardque3 жыл бұрын
@@ganonk79 Jeep
@plinyelder81563 жыл бұрын
Hummer? Do you mean the HMMWV? Stupid?
@atuldwivedi87493 жыл бұрын
War is not won only with weapon but with courage as we see in Afghanistan and Vietnam.
@shresthjain16253 жыл бұрын
I wanted to write how Biden gifted Taliban the humvees but the comment section got it covered Literally man now it feels good to have experts with us in the community.. Keep it up.
@Bankaraya_TV3 жыл бұрын
i am srilanka man for work commando regiment.your video is very interest
@tednordquist52663 жыл бұрын
It was loud, slow, too big for narrow roads, too small for adequate protection. I read that Israel was going with Jeeps as they could do more daily things better and leave heavy, plodding vehicle needs to heavy plodding vehicles.
@deepbludude46973 жыл бұрын
Yep same we were given some of these in 2010, I wasnt impressed better off in those Diesel Ranger crew cabs...
@harrisonfitzpatrick45423 жыл бұрын
“David vs. Goliath”… that is B.S. Oshkosh already makes the majority of the military’s wheeled ground vehicle. That being said if the JLTV is anything like the LMTV or the HEMTT and their variants then I am excited to drive it.
@kwan76453 жыл бұрын
Gotta love those government acronyms 😜
@d3m1g0d43 жыл бұрын
I wonder how many jltvs were left in Afghanistan
@DanafoxyVixen3 жыл бұрын
The thing i dont get is they are building a replacement for a warzone that is getting pulled our of. it'll probably be the case that the next new warzone these new vehicles wont be suitable for
@punyaslokmohapatra76313 жыл бұрын
True
@JustAGooseman3 жыл бұрын
Only the JLTVs are designed with a european mindset as well because there is PLENTY of them in woodland camouflage already. They are built to withstand ANY explosive devices up to aircraft dropped munitions.
@napobg68423 жыл бұрын
The vehicle is Amazing and it looks Amazing. Good job Oshkosh!
@noobtoob77333 жыл бұрын
Petition to replace it with the CYBERTRUCK w/ the solar panel!
@sahraj26093 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Imagine a fleet of Cybertrucks. Rolling at you, would look like an alien invasion.
@jesuisrobert8083 жыл бұрын
The battery would cause fire possibly
@noobtoob77333 жыл бұрын
@@jesuisrobert808 fun fact. gas combustion cars are statically more likely to go on fire than EVs, by at least 10 times. It’s literally called a combustion engine. U work for big oil or something?
@noobtoob77333 жыл бұрын
@@mrbears34 how does the change the fact that ICE vehicles catch on fire more often statistically. Your point, is pointless.
@jameschen83 жыл бұрын
@@mrbears34 both ICE and lithium can be fire hazards when damaged
@peace72363 жыл бұрын
Thats my company. Thanks 🔥
@Wingly1133 жыл бұрын
The U.S military has already replace the humvee, by leaving it for the Talibans in the Afghanistan
@AyushGupta-sm9ux3 жыл бұрын
Good video 👍.
@pacowaco98673 жыл бұрын
They have been replacing the M4/M16 for 2 decades now, you really think they are going to phase out Humvees for MRAPS any time soon? Good luck with that lol.
@IonorReasSpamGenerator3 жыл бұрын
They need JLTV only for frontline duties, driving around the air base in middle of the US with JLTV is a waste of taxpayers money...
@seanthe1003 жыл бұрын
They already have at my base though.
@pacowaco98673 жыл бұрын
@@seanthe100 They have phased out the humvee? What base?
@seanthe1003 жыл бұрын
@@pacowaco9867 Pendleton
@pacowaco98673 жыл бұрын
From what I am seeing, they upped their numbers of MRAPs but they haven't gotten rid of their humvees. I would not argue that MRAPs will increase in numbers, I just don't see MRAPS completely replacing humvees. If I am wrong, it is what it is.
@TheNefastor3 жыл бұрын
yet another quality ad from CNBC.
@roshanchachane1423 жыл бұрын
You know the idea of Jack of all trades never really works in defence, we have the biggest example in front of our eyes, F-35
@karozans3 жыл бұрын
You mean the trillion dollar plane that lost every single metric against the 1970s F-16?
@roshanchachane1423 жыл бұрын
@@karozans Yup, that bird. They wanted to replace every other jet fighter of the US Air a force with F-35 and look now they placed fresh order for F-15EX and F-16 are still flying high
@kolinmartz3 жыл бұрын
There’s a difference between a plane trying to be a jack of all trades and a light ground vehicle that’s trying to replace a jack of all trades that replaced a jack of all trades.
@karozans3 жыл бұрын
@@kolinmartz Why?
@kolinmartz3 жыл бұрын
@@karozans because the f35 was trying to be the only combat jet in the inventory. Trying to fulfill roles that are vastly different. The JLTV is just trying to be the HMMWV but better. It’s literally just replacing one role.
@robertwacay98272 жыл бұрын
We need this kind of vehicle the JLTv a dozen like this
@mathews89703 жыл бұрын
The rich invest their money and spend what is left. The poor spend their money and invest what is left"
@maxwell27033 жыл бұрын
My personal portfolio/investment manager, Mr Dan Morehead after a whole week of research, he runs an investment platform where you don't have to under go any stress in the trades, he manages my trading..
@henrytapio44823 жыл бұрын
What a small universe as I'm suprise to see Mr MICHAEL WAYNE mentioned here, My spouse recommended him to me after investing £4000 and he has really helped us in this time of lockdown in australia due to covid19
@Efacexy111113 жыл бұрын
Please do you mind sharing any means of reaching out to him easily? I'm really interested I believe this is genuine
@davidwilson24503 жыл бұрын
Mr Michael Wayne is a certified Broker I have worked with him for months, just live all your trading worries on him and attain financial freedom
@davidwilson24503 жыл бұрын
Mr Michael Wayne is a certified Broker I have worked with him for months, just live all your trading worries on him and attain financial freedom
@IstintoX-Soldato3 жыл бұрын
Yup learning about that here at ait in fort lee.
@blackumbrella61993 жыл бұрын
Sir, we need to turn all Humvee to electric. But what about EMP? We'll turn that to electric too sir.
@demanischaffer3 жыл бұрын
The only force that can send off an EMP is a nuke So if you have to deal with EMPs, then you have a way larger issue then that
@blackumbrella61993 жыл бұрын
@isaL We are a member of a secret group 😬
@kolinmartz3 жыл бұрын
You’d need a nuke for that. At that point that will be the least of your problems.
@Jempath3 жыл бұрын
I’ve seen these many times on base. The vehicle is really cool and tall
@MadeByBishop3 жыл бұрын
2:42 "bae" systems? 🤣 Narrator needs to do some research on pronunciation. Love you bae.
@soss02683 жыл бұрын
I love humvee I’m buying one for myself one day
@ApoorvaRajBhadani3 жыл бұрын
US defence industry : give these humvees to taliban then we'll make new ones for you Biden : okay
@curious10533 жыл бұрын
Ya plus Biden would say “huh?”
@seanthe1003 жыл бұрын
They were replacing HMMWV for the last decade and a half this is nothing new. Most HMMWV haven't been used seriously for years...
@gunturalam76433 жыл бұрын
Trend of futuristic IFV likes Lynx is awesome, it's interesting if any variant of Wheel.
@muskreality3 жыл бұрын
The *launch* of the latest armoured vehicles has *blast off* the outdated humvee
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@sambotros19183 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGHUiaGdiJeffqM
@42luke933 жыл бұрын
It’s like the LLV’s of the military except the Humvess are still made. Also now thsi reminds me to check Jerry Rig Everything’s electric humvee build.
@DrunkNotIAm3 жыл бұрын
I guess we need replacement stuff considering almost everything got left in the stan.
@Buck123four3 жыл бұрын
4,000 HMMWVs...that were considered OBSOLETE for US forces.
@that08713 жыл бұрын
These are already in use, I seen a Maxxpro hit a IED, I had brothers that were injured but survived, Gunner was seriously injured. But I like the oshkosh over the International
@sambotros19183 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGHUiaGdiJeffqM
@rustythrombosis54173 жыл бұрын
I'd wait a couple of months and get the Taliban's input. They may think a softer suspension, or more torque, or a female seeking stone launcher might be a valued upgrade.
@outsidejournal88323 жыл бұрын
😂
@alparslankorkmaz29643 жыл бұрын
Nice video.
@martinmartin63003 жыл бұрын
400k, like a house, for a troop transporter is a somewhat horrendous price. These vehicles should be considered special force/purpose vehicles more than anything. There is no way to use such a vehicles as a main troop transporter in a potential full scale war.
@bravolegacy86733 жыл бұрын
So you’re putting a price on human life? You don’t think the people on the front lines deserve adequate protection? It’s better than politicians lining their pockets.. plus it’s not supposed to completely replace, it only add to combat capabilities not limited to only SF.
@martinmartin63003 жыл бұрын
@@bravolegacy8673 Well, sir, you formulated questions but these seem to be rhetoric so it seems to me as if you interprete some things into my comment that I didn't say nor meant. Believe me, I would love the idea that every military personel who is operating in the near east could drive in these vehicles. Because these are small scale military operations this is somewhat viable. I don't think, however, that it is viable to only concentrate on assymetric forms of warware because the main purpose is still to be able to defend your country in case of a full scale war. Imagine the USA would get into a war with some greater power, let god prevent this. Then you would have well less than 1% of your ground troops riding around in these vehicles because they have a cost of a freaking house. So if at all, it is not me putting a price on the lifes of people but the producers of these vehicles who think it is OK to demand 400k for a single vehicle. This is not the definition of an armys main vehicle and this is what it's about as far as I understood.
@bravolegacy86733 жыл бұрын
@@martinmartin6300 understandable, but remember it’s not meant to replace ,simply adds to combat capabilities. The national guard won’t need these if war reaches home because the Humvee is more than suitable for domestic operations. the $400k vehicles are made to deflect the blast of an explosive from below, so they have their role and probably won’t be used outside of that too often due to outside factors etc. if a greater enemy is able to inflict damage on our land then explosives will be coming from above, meaning you need quantity over quality and more focus on air and space superiority is my thought on the topic.
@jamesstewart30003 жыл бұрын
JLTV's are badass when their armor is superior.
@zlpatriot113 жыл бұрын
How about we first reduce military spending and the influence of the Military Industrial Complex?
@seankilburn72003 жыл бұрын
America can’t afford to reduce military spending
@zlpatriot113 жыл бұрын
@@seankilburn7200Sure we can. If we can afford a war in Afghanistan for 20 years, we sure can afford: stronger safety nets, affordable housing, green energy, a stronger workforce, and infrastructure to name a few.
@Landofjello3 жыл бұрын
"influence of the Military Industrial Complex" What does this term mean to you?
@zlpatriot113 жыл бұрын
@@Xinyouting RIP George Carlin
@seankilburn72003 жыл бұрын
@@zlpatriot11 that can all be done without reducing military spending
@elram26493 жыл бұрын
@8:57 Baja 1000 shout out! Classic off-road racing circuit!
@magmomwise3 жыл бұрын
The first Oshkosh MRAP version was a thrill to drive, high speed and smooth ride. I thought the whole cab was too cramped and seats uncomfortable when in your inside with full body armor on. The exhaust was loud (little or no muffling). First gen of anything has it's faults. Second and Third gen the bugs get worked out. I think Oshkosh is on the right track.
@gianpaolovillani63213 жыл бұрын
The Humvee is a beautiful military car, I want it to remain operational for many more decades, and never need to be replaced from the jltv.
@HibHab693 жыл бұрын
CNBC loooves updating us on the new developments of the military industrial complex.
@TheBlueCopperrrX3 жыл бұрын
Do you not have a relative or friend who you’d like to see continue being alive… Lol shut up Hippy. Go watch a react video, the adults are talking.
@TexasDragon3 жыл бұрын
A golden opportunity. Make the Warthog already
@Wolfkin19833 жыл бұрын
Civilians: I'm gona buy a Humvee! Military Vet: Let me tell you a horror story and why you shouldn't buy one. 🤣Civilians are so out of the loop.
@largemarge16033 жыл бұрын
Getting ready to fight the wars of 1914-2016.
@PrivateSolrac3 жыл бұрын
"Bae" systems 🤣🤣 B.A.E. 😅
@007supertime3 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d53bYoadZaitppY
@mikethemechanic73953 жыл бұрын
Best sleep in my life was in a hummer. Wintertime snowing with the heater in full blast. I swear sleeping gas would pour out!
@jeffa2513 жыл бұрын
Ofcourse the rep is gonna say Oshkosh is the best option for the recompete... they are a Wisconsin based company XD
@davidjardenil83933 жыл бұрын
In the 1940s we did have the Willys jeeps the workhorse of the U.S. Army. We still have this in provinces of the Philippines such as Pampanga, Nueva Ecija, Iloilo and other provinces. Now we have this Humvees so much so it could help a lot in our Philippine armed forces daily operations. Instead, do not let your Humvees gather dust and rust in the junkyard but sell this to the Philippine armed forces.
@DynamicHaze3 жыл бұрын
That's why we have a high military expenditure, no real inovation the military industrial complex charges as much as it can get away with.
@ViolentKisses873 жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to see a cybertruck with thicker steel and a V-shaped hull. The battery alone would add alot of armor if the issue of lithium battery fires could be adressed.
@DynamicHaze3 жыл бұрын
@@ViolentKisses87 would probably be better to use a fuel cell.
@sambotros19183 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGHUiaGdiJeffqM
@JustAGooseman3 жыл бұрын
the military economic system is self-replenishing. government pays company to make truck, company pays people to build and design truck, company sells truck to government, and those people who were payed to build the trucks pay taxes and it all just goes back into the ecosystem. You people act like money just disappears forever when you spend it lmfao
@DynamicHaze3 жыл бұрын
@@JustAGooseman what ecosystem? Money doesn't exist, the materials are finite, the resources wasted to create weapons of destruction and tools to facilitate wasteful and useless conflicts across the world. How much of that money do you think reaches the veterans on the streets right now. I'm tired of talking to buffoons who can't conceptualize a world outside of this stupid structure.
@Lets_DoWhatWeWant3 жыл бұрын
Maintenance now is contracted vs to change a tire you need a contractor to do it?
@shresthjain16253 жыл бұрын
Taliban waiting for Christmas when Santa Biden will give them these replacements..
@mrKramble3 жыл бұрын
should create a military version of cybertruck .. cheap, scalable, strong and more then enough distance compared to the use of average MilVehicle 💪
@gidd3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes , nothing says America more than overspending on the military
@dreoneful3 жыл бұрын
The H1 would always be one of my favorite truck
@asimpleguy27303 жыл бұрын
I’m happy to see the Congress is spending taxpayers money for the American people.. oh, wait
@nukemanmd3 жыл бұрын
I always get a kick out of how easily the military awards multi-billion dollar contracts as if they were chump change. I realize that there is a need for military gears, but we need to be more selective of where we spend our dough.
@ss_pieman96773 жыл бұрын
Cry bozo 🚬🗿
@sambotros19183 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pGHUiaGdiJeffqM
@JustAGooseman3 жыл бұрын
military budgets are closed circuit and do not majorly trickle out into the public civilian world. Its also a self sufficient system where the money spent is always just recycled back into the system. There is no reason NOT to invest in your military because it creates jobs, gets your military supplied and you don't hemorrhage money.
@williambyast77912 жыл бұрын
Go the Aussie Bushmaster!! Awesome Kit!!
@yusufwaziri11853 жыл бұрын
Glad my Tax money is being spent on this
@MrTJPAS3 жыл бұрын
Nobody: Mike Gallagher at 3:51 : a*GILITY*
@tripsquared_greenworks3 жыл бұрын
Way too expensive
@war80363 жыл бұрын
The JLTV for the whole vehicle and accessories delivered is over $1 million dollars now
@srevinUreuqnoC3 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile, no money for homeless and those in medical need. Bravo America, bravo.
@bobafett_89223 жыл бұрын
This comment proves you have no idea about us government spending and other internal factors
@TN_Barricade3 жыл бұрын
I think the terradyne gurkha would be a good addition to the military.
@petermokmane75043 жыл бұрын
Yeah replace them and fly a bunch over to the Talibans for their feed back. So far they're your best customers.
@ramonsmediablog3 жыл бұрын
They’ve already have, but I’m sure the Humvees will still be around for reserve vehicles.