How to review and edit a pull request

[@adygombos4469]

I was looking for how would someone go about implementing changes requested by a reviewer and this video explain that and more. Thank you very much!

[@shawnz9833]

Oh my, the best explain among the 5+ videos explaining PR on youtube

[@jcnarasimhan4218]

Clear, exactly what I was looking for - thank you

[@_V__.]

Very nicely explained and visualised. Thank you!

[@strgangeattractor]

Thanks, a lot of videos skip the phase of changing the code from the review comments!

[@deepwebtube]

Thanks for the walkthrough! Great explanation in simple sentences!

[@batikanboraormanci7954]

Great video, just enough details!

[@awndlr]

thanks so much. very helpful for me as total github newbie.

[@pratikshabhavsar6043]

Thank you so much buddy. That was really a simple thing , Thanks for explanation.

[@ioanabiris3472]

Thank you very much!! It's more clearer!

[@janania6859]

Thank you! This was really helpful.

[@Trader1717]

Great explanation by you sir

[@123userthatsme]

Instead of asking the pull requester to edit their code, couldn't you just do it yourself? What would that process look like?

[@xuyennguyenthi1274]

Very helpful for Github beginners. Thank you!

[@arunrajrajavel6193]

Is there any cli tool to handle the same ?

[@sandejai]

Thank you, that was very helpful

[@vladiklass1890]

Very good and clear! Thank you!

[@julkefoll]

Thanks man. Thanks a lot for the clear explanation.

[@portfedh]

Very cool, thank you!

[@ananyagupta8020]

Thanks for explaining so well!

[@Timothynithya]

Great video. Thanks!

[@ahyoungkim1244]

This is helpful. Thank you!

[@toxicsharkmw3]

Thank you exactly what i was looking for

[@missLiliv]

Thank you!

[@daria3887]

very good explained

[@shashikiran8258]

Thank you so much ❤

[@QuicksilverSG]

All this elaborate bureaucracy creates is a time-wasting chicken-and-egg dilemma for the reviewer of the Pull Request. How is the reviewer supposed to build, test, and review the request without actually updating their local clone of the feature branch with the committed files? The only way the reviewer can get access to those updates is to approve the Pull Request, which short-circuits the whole process before they can built or test the branch. What kind of backwards result is that supposed to accomplish?

[@aliasad8342]

Well explained

[@lkjadslkfjlaksj]

Thanks dude!

[@chukwuemekasmba]

Soft boy! Nice one!

[@abstractzeno2483]

thanks mate

[@johnyanastacio1107]

thanks

[@preciousvelia]

Thank you!