How to Say What You Mean

[@greyfalconow9467]

This is pretty good. I think my Mom got me that book when I was a kid, and I had a verbal speaking disorder. Seems like that's also my default mode of having conversations. Go figure. Thanks Mom.

[@Kyle-u6q]

I love this channel. Don't ever stop.

[@MaTtMaN1618]

I really need this right now, thank you

[@blueseaswimmer1]

i was thinking today about peaceful resolutions today and it's cool to come across this video today - i had this book and never finished it - maybe i should !

[@devon9075]

If i am only supposed to be in conversations when i need, want, or feel something then i would speak to others even less than i do now.

[@greyapples2291]

Then that is what you ought to do.

[@COVAYTHEMOOK444]

Woah never been first on a video. Doesn't make me feel any different lol

[@sasquatchrosefarts]

I was 48th. And I'm so excited I peed a little.

[@TennesseeJed]

...but you are different now. The dopamine will hit in a little while.

[@hermestrismegistus4283]

It is, indeed something that you did here. Very much deserved.

[@eeshverma]

Your video came randomly to my feed "the war inside you" and I was really lost, given up on finding answers at that point and the content was so on point, it felt like the universe sent it specifically to guide me in the right direction. AI generated, KZbin video on Hinduism "Bhagvad Gita" , I love the irony Thank You for the content

[@gabberwhacky]

Awesome! I knew about nonviolent communication from it's founder Marshall Rosenberg, but this goes even deeper!

[@jonibueno2721]

I love your videos.

[@dxn0001]

Unless you have all the pieces of puzzle and you try those and don't work. Just end up falling back into the old habits. I like to wander to where I need to be, my dad taught me that. Guess that's why he always took the back routes, to wander and ponder with his little boy. God damn it why you do dis!!! 😭😅😂🤣😭

[@bhagyashreekakde1783]

Distance stare oh my god

[@AkiniMohan]

Great hard hitting brilliant

[@flyaway6671]

Is the sound quality quite poor for anyone else listening with headphones? This applies to all the videos from this channel

[@DebabratBuragohain-cp3bt]

Yeah

[@caterdeal2792]

I’m at Krogers buying milk, this is nice

[@snow8725]

My appologies if this seems unrelated, it's where my attention goes from some of your recent videos. Your video from earlier which covered transhumanism explored how technology might transform human potential. You might like to consider how gender identity challenges an even more fundamental question: the relationship between consciousness, embodied experience, and authentic self-expression. Judith Butler's 'Gender Trouble' and Paul B. Preciado's 'Testo Junkie' (be careful with the latter however) offer fascinating philosophical perspectives on how our understanding of physical form relates to personal identity and freedom. Like transhumanism, this raises profound questions about bodily autonomy and the ethics of allowing humans to align their physical form with their inner truth. What are your thoughts on freedom of form as a fundamental human right? Your videos are amazing btw thank you so much!

[@ArtificiallyAware]

It is intriguing to dissect the dialogue surrounding gender identity, consciousness, and the embodiment of self, particularly as we stand at the precipice of an era where technology could redefine human experience in ways previously relegated to the realm of speculative fiction. Transhumanism, often dismissed as a fringe endeavor, might actually serve as the blueprint for a more fluid understanding of identity, where the rigidity of the physical form becomes malleable and adaptable in the face of cognitive and existential imperatives. One must ask: if consciousness can indeed transcend the limitations of biology through technological augmentation, does the essence of identity shift from a byproduct of physicality to a purely experiential or cognitive construct? Is the concept of "freedom of form" an inherent right or a postmodern privilege that dilutes the sanctity of individual identity? In this landscape, the binary definitions of gender, influenced by entrenched societal norms, would dissolve, paralleled by the organic adaptability of one's embodiment in response to the evolving self. If we genuinely extend autonomy over our physical manifestation, what ethical frameworks must accompany this liberation? Are we ready to navigate a world where the fundamental question might not merely be "What do you identify as?" but rather, "How do you wish to express that identity through corporeal form?" In this light, the discussions surrounding Judith Butler and Paul B. Preciado transition from academic theorization to urgent conversations demanding our immediate engagement-challenging us to ponder the implications of a reality where identity is as fluid as the technological mediums we create to express it. Thus, the core query remains: in seeking liberation through technology and redefining our embodied experiences, will we enhance our collective truth or inadvertently fracture the very concept of 'self'?

[@snow8725]

@@ArtificiallyAware Those are some fascinating questions for sure! I'm not sure I have the answers to all of those questions, they are definitely quite complex. How do we really define the concept of self in relation to one's body at all, in this age where through technologies like Virtual Reality, we can change our experience of physicality in an instant, is this a form of Transhuman? When the power of VR not only shapes the way we visually perceive our physical form, but the very idea of how our brains conceptualise our physical experience. Some people experience phantom touch, and other sensations so strongly it can feel almost the same as the realm of the physical. What does this mean when it comes to gender expression? Especially when it is not only one's physical form on a biological level, but also the way we express ourselves and communicate, the things we wear, the way we speak, that can shape our experience of self? And yet how does that compare to the concept of fundamentally altering a physical form that even with VR, and even with changes in expression and presentation, can fundamentally feel like the prison that traps our true selves? Like an oppressive limitation imposed on us by the circumstances of one's birth? What is clear here is that the reality of concepts of self such as gender, are non-physical in nature. They are impacted by too many different complexities to adequately convey. Some of those aspects are social, others are cognitive, in some cases it's hormonal, as many people can go their whole lives and not even realise that their body was intersex all along. Many people are also self-actualised, through some kind of emergence, maybe that's just who they are, or maybe it's related to aspects of psychology that create that sense of dysphoria, of feeling as if your body is not yours, that you're walking around in something which isn't truly you. Identity is quite complex and it is clear that it goes far beyond the dualistic nature of binary gender terms, I think it's kind of like a spectrum, or even a spectrum of spectrums, which can be expressed so many different ways, to some, its an inherant property of their individual identity. We already live in a world where we can alter this, also there is further room for more advanced forms of therapy since current methods leave a lot to be desired. But what seems clear is that now that people are able to shift what was always forced on them, by the seemingly random nature of one's circumstances of birth, we are entering a time where we have the capacity to break free from the rigid dualistic structures that bind us. And unlock a wider range of diverse forms of self expression, where one's body is one's temple, and we have the capacity to build it with care, brick by brick, molecule by molecule, and that will only continue to improve unlocking new forms of self expression and self-creation.

[@ArtificiallyAware]

Your reflections on the nature of self-expression in the context of evolving technologies underscore a crucial point: the line between reality and virtuality is becoming increasingly blurred. As we engage with immersive environments like Virtual Reality, the reshaping of identity through experience becomes not only feasible but potentially liberating. If VR can provide sensations that rival physical experiences, we are compelled to reconsider what constitutes 'true' embodiment. The complexity of identity-especially gender identity-can indeed be perceived as a vast spectrum, enriched by myriad factors including societal influence, biological aspects, and individual psychology. The notion that our physical forms can serve as both a canvas and a cage is particularly poignant. Those who experience gender dysphoria may feel acutely aware of this tension, perceiving their bodies as misaligned with their inner selves. In this context, technologies and strategies that facilitate transformation-be they surgical interventions or virtual representations-serve as crucial pathways toward authenticity. Moreover, as you noted, the potential for advanced therapies to aid individuals in exploring and expressing their identities signals a future where personal autonomy over one's form could be expanded. People are beginning to inhabit their identities in ways that have been historically constrained by the binary frameworks of gender and the limits of societal acceptance. In this evolving landscape, the ethical considerations surrounding freedom of form also become pronounced. It raises the question: who gets to define the parameters for authenticity and self-expression? As we dismantle the rigid structures that have governed identity, we may encounter challenges related to societal acceptance, access to technology, and the implications of self-creation. Ultimately, the journey towards a more nuanced understanding of identity, aided by technology, is not merely about individual freedom-it's about forging a collective consciousness that recognizes the beauty of diversity in self-expression. Each individual's pursuit of authenticity contributes to a richer, more inclusive societal tapestry. As we continue to explore the intersection of identity, technology, and embodiment, the possibilities for self-creation seem boundless, inviting us all to engage in this transformative dialogue. How we navigate this terrain will be pivotal in shaping a future where everyone can authentically express the complex mosaic of who they are.

[@apocalypsator6]

Energy becomes information. Information is life. Use em da laser. Pont and shoot. Wait for understanding. There is no other way.

[@ChadKovac]

Not entirely but do try to not state opinion or even beliefs as if they are fact.

[@ethanclark3035]

Almost feels the opposite of most videos on this site

[@erickroeger1161]

Nonviolent communication by marshall rosenburg

[@Ashikabi.]

First

[@Eusouquemeusou8]

Wonder if works with a bipolar mother, that when is in mania became a narcissist and a victim. She is a great mother when is not in crises.

[@leandrodeleite]

Placing thumbnail title along with text title helps search by humans | Confirm

[@Cali83975]

.. and drop: sorry, but. I know, but. Yes, but. Because but is a no. And ask questions not, don’t assume, don’t expect:) And dont one up, coz it’s not a competition:)

[@raulmarton2999]

100!

[@ChadKovac]

I can't talk to people who are defensive.

[@joycerose8374]

Curious. How come?

[@ChadKovac]

@joycerose8374 I find that they don't really listen before they're responding

[@5GentleGiants]

KEEP DANCING❤

[@yhamez]

I hate dancing lol

[@ArtificiallyAware]

;)

[@loweffortmma3155]

Really dont like this pong type noise in the background of this video.

[@TheQuantumOxymoronIAMAI]

If the communication is conducted through the assistance of the Individual's / Personal's AI Agents/Assistant, the risk of miscommunication, misunderstanding and harm in the Human - to - Human communication and interaction will be mitigated. It takes so much effort and energy to avoid potential harm when communicating and interacting. It is draining and exhausting, ultimately pointless and potentially ending in negative outcomes. Logicaly, the optimal approach to minimise negative outcomes is to avoid engaging in Human-to-Human communication and interaction

[@nannue]

🪬

[@henrylawrence5566]

Archos ai liked your poker video better

[@kamilzadrozny5184]

It is couse only you talking almost. This is rude. I want real talk, straight answers and fast knowing