How to Win More Games of Warhammer 40K - a Practical Guide

[@SarajevoKyoto]

Play against me, your win rate is guaranteed to increase

[@RealJahzir]

If we play each other, one of us would win more😅

[@laserbeastman7447]

I’ve played an entire game of 40k where I never rolled above a 4. Trust me, everyone can lose. It’s the one thing we all share.

[@andrewzimmerman2985]

If we played each other? Guaranteed draw.

[@Falafel6723]

If we played a match, we'd both lose

[@wardentraijnor5660]

Your telling me, the last person I played against thought it would be a good idea to swap dice since that might have been the problem. But no, I couldn't get a good roll with their dice either

[@BoneTrait]

Theoretical: Watch this video, get better at the game. Practical: Forget it all and lose horribly.

[@theotv5522]

fuk it, we ball

[@4TheLion]

Lol

[@rxdrxd7468]

The thing I think is worth saying is focus less on winning straight away, but on achieving some goals. For example, focusing on score reliably game to game. It can be even something like 5 points more goal every game, but actually focusing on improving will bring more benefit than just seeing things like win/lose situation. Another goal could be: ok, now I can score points, next game I will focus on point denial if able. Maybe my approach can be sometimes a bit slow and without patience feeling like no improvement at all, but it worked for me.

[@CMTechnica]

This. So much this. When I first started out I thought the only way to win was to clear the other player from the board. And while that’s the case in what, a handful of missions, it shouldn’t be the end goal. Especially for new players. You end up missing out or struggling to grasp the objective missions when that’s what wins the game majority of the time

[@Yotrymp]

That's where most of the fun is

[@SablexFlag]

I appreciate how you’ve addressed concerns of people who want to min/max as well as us normal people who can’t just drop thousands of currency units on the newest hotness

[@tylonblas2581]

What improved my win rate was coming up with an army that fits your game plan and try to execute that same plan every game. You’ll learn how to adapt that same game plan for every mission and you’ll learn how to improve it with every game. You’ll learn how to strengthen and support the weaknesses with small unit changes. Like Auspex said, just lots of practice. :)

[@TheBprez]

As someone who has done well at tournaments, the thing that helped me the most was asking my opponent if they thought I could have done anything differently or better. Usually they will have noticed something I didn't, and vice versa. Might be harder in a tournament when you're strapped for time, but appreciate Auspex Tactics pointing this out.

[@billcosplay5408]

How to win more games? Watch more auspex tactics!

[@tedcruz212]

Play orks, they you win even if you loose because something funny is always guaranteed to happen

[@OdeezyBaby18]

I just wanna say that I've been getting back into 40k after about 10 years and your content has been absolutely perfect. Thank you!

[@tbone11x]

Plan as if you're going to be rolling a 90% failure rate

[@bestnameever1850]

the best peice of advice i have heard all day

[@robainsworth2014]

I just play Blood Angels so I only need to roll 2s and threes 🤣

[@tbone11x]

@@robainsworth2014 I set my dudes up, deathwing, to hit and wound on 2s with rerolls. I still plan as though I'll have a 90% failure rate.

[@robainsworth2014]

@@tbone11x hahaha 😂

[@PelinalDidNothingWrong]

Winning is fun and all but nothing beats the thrill of a close match where both sides pull out all the stops. Win or Lose,give me an enjoyable match and I won't complain!

[@thecasualwargamer5195]

Well said.

[@PelinalDidNothingWrong]

​@@thecasualwargamer5195 🤟

[@mumblez7712]

Amen. Lost a game to Imperial Guard by 2VP (World Eaters). The whole game swung back an forth on 3 diff rolls / combats in turn 5

[@weirdboy4thewin]

winning a game as deathwatch against prenerf dark angels did get me some street cred

[@dyciefisk2535]

How close was it?

[@Tzar-TZ]

best way to combat "That Guy" is to just ask them to show you the rule if you are ever unsure

[@wbizzell6982]

Auspex, more than any other channel I watch, is one that I genuinely hope is a source of fun and enjoyment for the creator, because I certainly get so much out of the content here, and I would hate to be getting so much out of something that someone has to force themselves to do.

[@ernstbergerbrent]

Finding a local RTT helps. It's normally a 1 day tournament with a handful of people. That makes it approachable. It has dramatically improved my knowledge of the game and gave me more motivation to paint my pile of grey shame.

[@equos5060]

Last time I played with my necrons against bolter nuns, I just focused on blasting as mamy of them as I could. Also, I decided that hunting for Morvenn's head will be a good game inside a game xd best fun I had in months. Just stop caring about the points!

[@bradleymartinez185]

Auspex: buying the best and newest to be competitive models will be a second mortgage Be me, a thousand sons and raven guard lover who hasn't had new models in years: 😌

[@gingerfury47]

Tsons are still good.

[@bradleymartinez185]

@@gingerfury47 competitively they have one of the worst win rates at like 43%, after arks of omen I think they're 46? Everyone else is sitting pretty at upper 40's or lower 50's so they're pretty bad unfortunately

[@CMTechnica]

@@gingerfury47because they crutch spam mortal wounds in the psychic phase

[@CloverBoe]

​@@CMTechnica yeah I love my son's but it's so boring doing MW spam that I was doing buffing sons but it's a day and night difference on strength

[@christyrann7739]

@@gingerfury47 I love them but no

[@jules9094]

My friends and I play tabletop simulator and we limit our armies to models we actually own unless we're trying out a new faction we're interested in. It's useful especially when I think back to an army I wanted to build and then play the faction to realise I didn't actually like the faction.

[@TredecimMusic]

I would like to point out an absolute beauty of a blog for this purpose called “Goonhammer”! They have an amazing start competing series (Just google “Goonhammer start competing” and you’ll get an index) that has guides on all aspects of competitive play, including: List building, deployment, math-hammer, tournament prep, General tactics, and more! They’re even sorted by skill level. They also have articles for each individual army. Though they’re not always updated to 9th (all of the marine armies are, not sure about the others) they all have solid information on how the army plays, even if the meta stuff isn’t always accurate.

[@user-eh5hl5tt6t]

Sick video as ever. You going to Warhammer Fest? If so, what’re you bringing? I’m taking a converted GSC army. Lots of bikes and vehicles and hybrids 👽

[@captainflapjax7240]

The Auspex Angel on my shoulder "magnetizing can lead to solid future proofing". The Resin Devil on my other shoulder "PRINT MORE! HAVE ALL THE LOADOUTS!". Yall I have over 20 Carnifexes and over 30 crisis suits now, it's bad. I just started working on Knights and Moiraxes have 2 arms that each can have 1 of 4 different weapons....I NEED 90 MOIRAXES!

[@thegamer9302]

11 months in dream of getting that first w is still alive!!

[@jj3272]

"Acquire Knowledge" is a great one to live by. Bet most Grey Knight players don't fully exploit or even know about the Unit of Psykers rule. Can be a great way to either get around smite distance rules or make casts out of line of sight from denying models.

[@8aked]

Great video. I'm new to 40K, starting my first army (Adepta Sororitas) and this was definitely helpful for me! P.S thanks for the great work you do, I love watching/listening to your videos!

[@No_nameOG]

I’m still building up my Sororitas army, too. Such a fun one to paint and build.

[@danielsg982]

As Sun-Tzu said: "Just run Eightbound"

[@Ghislain82]

Macro tactics is called a strategy. Smaller level micro tactics are just called tactics 😊. You actually said it a couple of times but if you follow formal military strategy vs tactics, strategy is a grander big picture concept. Whilst a tactic is a smaller usually on the ground concept. American military strategy usually involves massive air superiority while tactics are more often decentralized to individual units to make decisions.

[@mtrunkello]

I enjoyed building fun and balanced lists in 8th edition for dark angels. But unfortunately in my area the general player is the "meta list googler". I always played against grey, unpainted, just off the 2nd hand market armies, because they were always buying models that were currently op. It wasnt fun and ended up selling my minis.

[@The80sWolf_]

Yea that is one reason im torn between beginning or not.

[@mtrunkello]

@@The80sWolf_ i promised to my friends that when the lion returns so will i. I will remake my dark angels with the lion in the front but i will focus more on the modelling side and rarely play. I really enjoyed building and painting them myself while listening to podcasts and audiobooks. Also binds the army more to you by being so invested in the models. One of my regular intercessors were able to kill a c'tan with firing overwatch. Hit on 6, wounded on 6, my buddy failed the 4+ save with rerolls and the c'tan shard of the nightbringer died. I spent hours painting that 1 intercessor to peak and naming him in honor of his heroic achievement :) these little things made the hobby enjoyeavle for me, not the sweaty tournaments.

[@Dagenham_Swish]

​@@mtrunkello i love this Intercessor story, it is THE reason we play this game; the stories the dice end up telling us

[@mtrunkello]

@@Dagenham_Swish yeah the most unlikely situations are the most memorable. And i love that you can visually represent these. I once saw a guy who tally marked vehicle kills on his landraider by gluing those little purity seals on its side. One side was almost full of it and you could see the guy was proud of that model and how long he had it. It really makes the difference between a min maxer who play a different army after every rule change and someone who plays this as a fun hobby. Also way more fun the play against these people because you want to be part of their lore and not lose interest in the game immidiately when the opponent pulls out 9 leman russes with 3 vindicare assassins hugged by 3 vertus praetors... man i should have packed my stuff and left :D

[@Spacefrisian]

I like gotcha moments, my Imperial Fist is a entire gotcha army as people think iam playing them how everyone else plays them, sit back and shoot alot. But i fortify the center and kindly ask my opponent to try and break upon my walls of Gravis and Terminator armor.

[@crazyshak4827]

Honestly, that sounds very much like a Dorn approach to warfighting

[@Spacefrisian]

@@crazyshak4827 It kind of does. Not like most IF players would do...or Iron Hands.

[@HispAnakin42]

More dakka seems to work for guard

[@CMTechnica]

Always has

[@11AleZZ]

Play with the flavour of the month army, like the top competitive players, and your % of victories it's gonna go up

[@gingerfury47]

Getting into tournament play was the best thing for me to learn the game and enjoy it better. The community in North East PA was the key to it no tryhards

[@RSBurgener]

The impression I've gotten of late 9th edition is that unless you bring all the right, on-meta stuff from your codex, you're probably in for a slaughter. Even if you wanna play casual, the game can often force the meta on you if you want to have any hope of winning. It's that lethal these days.

[@DollClockheart]

I disagree from my own experience. I've played plenty of games that weren't all on-meta, even in a more competitive environment, and had victories and close games. Meta usually only matters if its a proper abuse case (such as Tzeentch Flamers), otherwise its very much mostly for high-level play.

[@SarajevoKyoto]

@DollClockheart I disagree from my own experience. It's "meta or go home", a single unit not pulling its weight for a turn is enough for a "Game Over" with how lethal 9th has become.

[@absolutfreak5012]

It varies greatly depending on your army, your opponent's army, and how you build your lists. Yes, if you're going into the competitive scene, you're going to be definitely pushed in the direction of dealing with the current meta. (I can relate, after attempting some Bad Moon ork lists at a few tournaments) However, it's very possible to have some great games with non optimal units if both you and your opponent are on board for casual list builds. The same Bad Moons that fell on their face at a GT gave me some very fun games in the escalation crusade that we ran at the FLGS. Communication is key.

[@Hello-no7gm]

That's literally the same as any other game.

[@SeanHoltzman]

"Why can't my lazy jank list beat hard-work refined comp list" The question for the ages, apparently. A good/Great players in 9E, according to them and what Ive seen with following and discussing with certain players and teams that are pretty good locally, can bring anything and go 3-2 in a tournament setting. The pros believe the different between a 5-0 is usually playing for long days with zero misplays more than any "winning at list building." There are some lists that don't even spam max-takeable of one unit, and instead spread a lot of 1-off squads out that go 5-0 this ed. This ed is definitely a skill issue much more than any other edition I have played - and I started in 3E

[@eviljoshy3402]

In my circle of friends, my win/loss ration is probably 3 out of 10 games I win. However, I feel a good reason for that is we're not playing objectives. We're building legit armies but we're just doing open play. I've suggested we start playing objectives but some of us are still learning the game. So we haven't made the change. There's also 10th coming out soon. The biggest issue is one of us plays Aeldar. Since he does not need to hold any objectives, he is never out in the open. I think he's only lost one match so far and that was only because he was experimenting with a new army build. Another reason is my nephew collects death guard and everyone does the same thing. They walk backwards while shooting at him. Forcing him to endure until he pushes them to the boards edge before he can finally fight back.

[@samhunter1205]

You could try just playing primary and mission objectives at first, and then adding in selected secondaries once you are all comfortable with that. IMO objectives are key to balance, but also add a good layer of strategy to the game.

[@aaronhollinger7005]

I would recommend the Open War pack if you're willing to drop 20$. Random deployment, Random objective and the option of Twists if you want something a little different.

[@theturtleshack7664]

Just the video I needed before I face my roomate today

[@joshsmith1179]

Thank you for going into this. Here is my take: Don't try to get all the models for even your own army. Get the core of what you need, learn your and the army's play style, then fill as you need. I'd say 93% of players are helpful; the rest are newbies or take the game too seriously. You'll know which they are by the movement phase. Lol. Talk to them. This community is A+ on helpfulness! Finally, read the rule books germaine to your army like it's your job. It'll help you play better instead of spending 10 minutes reminding yourself how fast your Terminators are. Your opponent will appreciate it as well! And always, HAVE FUN!

[@travis8106]

Finally, the Auspex Tactics official "git gud" video

[@scavvon3433]

Playing a game of 40K competitively and not being a Win-At-All-Costs bozo is absolutely a thing, though sadly not for many players. Attaching your sense of self-worth to winning at the Beer-and-Pretzels game of 40K is truly embarrassing. Don't do it kids.

[@Smilomaniac]

1. Leave most of your ego at the door and make it your goal to have a good time - You can learn the game in a short while but it takes years to understand. This isn't a reaction time MOBA where you pick up the game and just have a knack for it, there are multiple ways in 40k that you can be good, whether it's strategically, mathematically and/or with abstract understanding (synergies, combos, optimal stats etc). Learn to lose with grace and learn how to recognize what you did wrong. Don't blame the dice and don't blame "the balance", because this is an asymmetrical game and not everyone has an equal chance (and it'll never be the case). But, do try your best of course. 2. Simple units means it's simple to see where things go right or wrong. Don't build an optimized net-list, build a strong core (triplicates of units) and work from there, where you add or detract according to what you enjoy playing. If you find that you never seem to be able to move off of your side of the table (and that it's a problem for you) you might need more bikes/skimmers/speeders/jump troops. If you find you don't like how squishy your troops are, maybe you need more of them or more elite troops. (You don't have to buy everything to start with, you can proxy models to test what you want to build and go from there) 3. Simple doesn't mean bad - Not being special means it's not a problem to lose them and when you have, let's say 3x3 Outriders (315 pts), that's 36 wounds at T5 who are very mobile and absolutely shred guard equivalents. If there are none of those, you can use them to screen off your obsec and objectives. Reivers are 16pts a piece, meaning 30 for 480pts. Despite being called "useless" if you flood the table with 6x5 of them coming in from all angles (free deepstrike/grapple) that's 60W your opponent has to chew through which enhances what the rest of your army does. 3 Redemptor Dreadnoughts are solid firing platforms with a lot of wounds. On and on it goes. 4. Cheat sheet - Write down your stratagems with short descriptions and page number (so you can check if necessary). You can lay them out like wahapedia does, so you can see which ones are relevant for defending against combat or shooting, for enhancing your own or for general use. Write down what your characters do to remind you of their auras, abilities or enhanced stats (warlord traits/relics). 5. You don't play to kill, you play to win - You win on objectives/victory points. It's a viable strategy to table your opponent, but you're only going to do that if you have a meta army or one that luckily happens to have what's currently strong because GW didn't adjust the points well or what have you. Most of the time you're just not going to be able to make a list that consistently wipes your opponent off the table even if you had perfect sight lines. You can strategize around punishing your opponent for moving forward with reserves/deepstrike, swamping them with chaff or making them overreact to one unit while being sneaky with others, but at the end of the day it's all about the primaries and secondaries. 6. Characters are cool but unless you can get them to do what they're good at, they're mostly a waste of points. That chunky 130pts Ironfather? Kind of a mid model that does a little bit of everything and nothing that well. He's best at sitting in a corner buffing a unit of troops and a dreadnought, that's it. That's a lot of points for very little. Unless you have a delivery method to get them into combat or you need them to enable and buff your other units, characters usually aren't worth it, especially not named ones. These points are meant for beginners or people who are starting a new army. This WILL increase your odds of winning but in order to win tournaments you need foresight and experience and you need experience to have meaningful foresight. I can tell you that a strong prediction from me for 10th is that vehicles that are good at taking out other vehicles will become a staple (provided vehicles in general aren't costed too high in points, in which case people generally won't bring vehicles, as has been the case for most of 8th and 9th). So getting at least one tank with high strength/damage guns will likely be a good investment. The reason being that GW has shown that a meltagun is only on par with a rhino's toughness and that you generally don't get much bigger anti-material weaponry on foot sloggers. Best of luck! Happy hobbying!

[@firemaneminiatures1337]

I play Lamenters, what's winning?

[@andrewbakescakes9684]

It's when you fail and get screwed over by misfortune more slowly than your opponent.

[@MeAmInfradyne]

My favorite way to win more games is to play more games. Get out there and play yall!

[@tarkhan15]

me: o scroll of wisdom tell me how to get better at painting scroll of wisdom: paint more me: nyeeeeh!

[@Tzar-TZ]

not playing meta is completely out of the control of players. GW change the game a bit too often for my liking which leads to ppls armies randomly becoming meta and not meta

[@CMTechnica]

It hurts. I only collect Phobos marines - always have until I got the HH starter box- and field squads of infiltrators and incursors. Now they’re meta because of AoO and all I get is “so you’re that guy” looks.

[@antoinecalloud6547]

OR do the chad move: go back to the roots, playing the army you love and the units you like, and the the hell with the « meta »

[@ArnBry]

I am by no means good at warhammer, but i like watching videos about rules, and i play orks mainly. attended my first tournament early april (was 1k pts without lords of war), and my goal was: make 3 vehicles explode. ended up exploding 2, getting 3rd place and having the best time ever. frantically painting up a 1k list of beast snaggas with lots o squigs at the moment.

[@jamisonmadson5799]

I play the objective because I fail all my wound rolls but I do well at making armor saves so it all balances out

[@KILLERAOC]

Two words - Loaded Dice!

[@SarajevoKyoto]

He gave me loaded dice! Guards, arrest that man!

[@EmeraldFatalis]

Guaranteed way to win more games when playing Orks: add blue to all your units!

[@97tepig]

As a blue ork player most rolls will fail except the critical ones to win the game.

[@Fly-the-Light]

First! I finally caught Auspex in speed! Now I am the fast one...until the next video comes out.

[@HispAnakin42]

Try again

[@The80sWolf_]

I get tired by even thinking about games with hours of dice rolling. Are there no apps or something to speed it up?

[@DanielShaw123]

More tactics videos would be great.

[@richard_n]

Great video, however the timing might be a bit bad with 10th around the corner. You should redo this once 10th has settled in.

[@xenopug6390]

This video is completely edition-agnostic what do you mean

[@randallmusgrave5138]

Useing the special dice for important rolls?

[@majorearl12]

Play smart. Learn your faction and their rules, then your units and what they do. My recent first win by myself was a 1000 point game. My Dark Angels vs Daemons of Khorne. I ran a Strikemaster, Champion, Apothecary, and Ancient along with Bladeguard (for character defense as they have Bodyguard abilities). Then 3 squads of Termies, but each squad was slightly different to build off of the strength. Two squads with TH/SS, but one squad had a cyclone and the other a Plasma Cannon/Powerfist. I was able to win thanks to my Apothecary healing and reviving models each turn (upgrade to Chief Apothecary and Selfless healer trait). But my goal was not to charge in and wipe my opponent out within a few turns, but rather holding just one of the objectives in the middle due to a secondary, and grind them down to take out more units each turn. But with my termies slow movement, i let the Daemons rush me so i could use my invulns to hold off their attacks, and using Ancient abilities, Warlord rerolls, and Apothecary healing my wall of Termies held up and by turn 5 my opponent had to keep his last 10-squad of Bloodletters alive to win, but i went first and slaughtered them without charging. Knowing that Daemons have a Daemon save that isnt affected by AP let me choose weapons that had little AP but more shots/attacks like having a squad of Storm bolters, Assault Cannon, Plasma Cannon (that i shouldve made a Heavy Flamer). Winning this game was a culmination of my knowledge from almost 20 or so games over the past year and it felt good to win and have learned even more afterwards.

[@oblivionfan345Tony]

Counter point: I like watching my big army move and fight across the board

[@aunderiskerensky2304]

step one to getting better: watch a lot of auspex tactics. step two: use your brain good. step three: have your dice blessed by a white witch.

[@a-manwhorememains334]

Easiest way. Chase meta and copy winning lists

[@samhunter1205]

That fails a surprising amount of the time. Some lists are brain-dead and pilot themselves (pre-nerf dark angel Deathwing spam, for example), but most require you to know why the list is built as it is.

[@AncientIrishCelt]

A video message exclusively for me. The voices are right!

[@YourBuddyDustin]

I miss Anihilation. Is that what we used to call it? No objectives, no secondaries, just make the other person quit. WAR!!!

[@Etycho]

Deployment is the biggest factor in victory- everything else is luck.

[@Dagenham_Swish]

Yeah gotta say was quite disappointed that auspex didnt cover this in any detail in this video

[@ConfusCat]

I really love my greenwing dark angels and had a lot of fun making the list, but when going against pure meta it’s not that much fun.

[@junolynch1263]

Dakka Dakka. Now there’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time.

[@WildWingZero]

Play more than one army, what are the odds of GW neglecting both armies at once? *Stares at Black Templars and Tau* I dunno.....pretty damn good.

[@timunderbakke8756]

“There’s a low chance both of your armies end up at the bottom” *laughs in not-DA space marines and Thousand Sons*

[@Stuffandstuff974]

1:55 play warhammer, get street cred, you can only pick one.

[@shadowl1980]

I guarantee the win at all costs is mostly the mindset.

[@anthonywilliams5093]

Good idea with Table Top Simulater! Do you know any Discord pages that people play on??

[@kieranwalsh2058]

Simple, play against yourself. You literally cannot lose

[@dantejrl]

i add one important thing : NEVER say "it's dices fault!"because if you eject faults on others, you will never learn nothing ^^

[@danielviehland]

Now I want to know how much it would cost to get enough models to play every possible tournament list.

[@Dracobyte]

I wish there was some online / digital version of Warhammer 40K.

[@Happy-zg4zd]

Tabletop simulator is great, but i know a lot of people that dislike it

[@DMHightower]

For me, 9th edition games easily take 4-5 hours at 2000 points.

[@MrDarthtelos]

Macro and Micro tactics is technically Strategy and Tactics respectively.

[@knightsolaire3781]

Hesitation is Defeat

[@aimmoth13]

But, do you need to have the army painted?

[@robbie_the_mastermind2176]

Is this for players who like playing competitively or for casuals?

[@beowylfen]

It'd probably be applicable to both

[@WilhelmScreamer]

All levels of play can benefit from playing better. How to execute

[@uriel005]

There is a significant portion of the hobby that is anti-winning... more so than I've seen in a lot of other places as if the idea that someone does well at the game is some indication of degenerate cognitive deficit. I still remember a guy outright calling me a bullshit try harding asshole when he brought an invisible belakor deathstar and lost and the funny thing was people agreed with him. The funniest part was I didn't play it particularly well but some unreasonably unlucky rolls on his part and non statistically high rolling on my part had the ork boys mob spam I had borrowed from a friend carry the day (friend was playing my iron hands list)+... and all I could think was what kind of crack are the people here smoking. That was years ago but it just stuck with me as I still see it all too often.

[@radicalpaddyo]

Orkz. Fankyu.

[@nicholasbeaver5262]

What I’ve always done is bring the stuff I think looks cool but now I’ve collected so many salamanders and with GW designing things like a 10 year old would i win games now

[@heckinmemes6430]

Step 1: Find out how many men the enemy has. Step 2: Reduce that number to ZERO!

[@CK-xs3vq]

Lose to SoB

[@SmurphofChaos]

21:30- ○ If Space Marines are all the rage, efficient high AP 'Damage -2': Damage 'minus 2'?🤣Lol

[@Tehstampede]

I hate the Fight phase and melee order in 9th edition so much. Getting rid of Initiative is one of the worst mistakes GW ever made. If your unit gets charged, the charging unit(s) get to fight first, and then they get to go first AGAIN in your following turn...who thought this was good game design?

[@drunkenboxer123456]

I’m about 18-1-75 not a bad record for pure CSM after AoC nerf

[@Happy-zg4zd]

Thats lose-tie-win ? Im sure gw woulnt neglect the main antagonist like that

[@nicholasbeaver5262]

I played salamanders before 8th 😏back when they sucked but we’re still cool 😎

[@Drathro81]

Is the answer “Play more games”?

[@merengueatang4]

Is this a reupload? It feels familiar

[@mrheem]

Whomever spends the least has already won.

[@unhappyman100]

Step 1 play space wolf's Step 2 EVERYHONE HAS THUNDERHAMMERS STEP 3 WIN

[@ca11rl77]

Doesn't seem what I do matters. I roll terribly. Never save, hit or charge

[@gavinboyer4634]

Ah, a Lamenters player.

[@samd5466]

🎉🎉🎉

[@martinazoana]

Increasing your win ratio is as simple as playing the cheesiest thing available. Increasing your enjoyment of the game is as simple as not playing against cheesers.

[@JakimAkim]

So play a cheese list against non cheese?

[@NornQueenKya]

Or. Or! Just play tyranids. Then the wins just happen like magic

[@DustyPazner]

Buy the newest models.

[@WarsmithThanatos]

You forget one. Cheat. Not a great option, but still an option.

[@error-zq8yo]

i make joke lists that are incredibly gimmicky

[@svenbochmann4510]

Step 1: cheat Step 2: don’t let anyone notice by being confident 😂

[@Beerpowered]

Step 1 Don't play a Faction that is F Tier.

[@paulprimetime100]

Step 1: buy desolation marines. Step 2: Win. 😂

[@andraskovacs5431]

Orks: More dakka Guard: More men Sisters: More prayer Everyone else: More warcrimes

[@Damnedlegion40k]

Add a comment...137

[@MarcinObuchowski]

Get gud, scrub!