How Will The Climate Crisis Affect The U.S. Economy | The Bottom Line

As the climate crisis continues to pose a global threat, top economists are debating its effects on the U.S. economy. In this episode of “The Bottom Line”, see how renowned economists like Jeffrey Sachs and Mark Zandi forecast the economic impact.
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
0:41 Urgency of action
2:27 Economic implications
4:02 Role of businesses and government
Produced and Edited by: Mark Licea, Jack Hillyer
Lead Producer: Juhohn Lee
Supervising Producer: Lindsey Jacobson
Graphics by: Jason Reginato
Additional Footage: Getty Images
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Want to make extra money outside of your day job? Take CNBC’s new online course How to Earn Passive Income Online to learn about common passive income streams. Register today and save 50% with discount code EARLYBIRD: cnb.cx/3Iwblnk
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC on Threads: cnb.cx/threads
Follow CNBC News on X: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
#CNBC
How Will The Climate Crisis Affect The U.S. Economy | The Bottom Line

[@mrobinson]

Lots of talk aa usual, No framework, No feasible or tenable plans, No great ideas or innovation…just pious & sanctimonious talk!

[@tomitmy9886]

No need for innovation, solutions exist and are there to be implemented

[@Dave_of_Mordor]

i literally just google this and here is what i found: Solar and wind energy is slowly increasing and investors are putting their money into the development and innovation of better technology in this area. The cost for these renewable energies are also decreasing. There is an increase in electric vehicles (these things also cause carbon emissions, but not as much as the ones run on gasoline, and it's better to drive the ones that emit less carbon than a ton of it). there is an international agreement where each country update their commitments to reduce carbon emissions every year, and the plan is to get every country to 50% by 2030. there are people who are doing their best to conserve forests around the world to help reduce the CO2 in our atmosphere. all of this is slowly happening right now. why isn't anyone googling this? they're doing something about this right now

[@mrobinson]

@@Dave_of_Mordor B/c ppl like me off grid live the reality not the theory. Lithium ion batteries STILL cost a fortune, copper wires are scarse & expensive. I have 5 solar panels, need 5 more,guess how expensive they'll be. EV cars in our traffic here is TOTALLY not feasible. This transition is a pipe dream till the obstacles are realistically addressed!

[@mrobinson]

@@tomitmy9886 B/c ppl like me off grid live the reality not the theory. Lithium ion batteries STILL cost a fortune, copper wires are scarse & expensive. I have 5 solar panels, need 5 more,guess how expensive they'll be. EV cars in our traffic here is TOTALLY not feasible. This transition is a pipe dream till the obstacles are realistically addressed!

[@Dave_of_Mordor]

@@mrobinson 😂 😂 live of grid but can use the internet 🤣🤣

[@brandonhamilton8871]

So smaller( poorer) countries should not be able to industrialize and become rich so their citizens can live a rich life too?

[@woodchuck003]

They had Robert Reich on this video is not about spreading information. This video is about ensuring you have the proper politics to live in the future authoritarian dystopia.

[@robertmarmaduke9721]

That ship has sailed. EU will be pampered by the US-UK-SA-IL Oil ￦ehrmacht, and US and UK papered because EU will pay €3.50 a liter, while 65% of Americans only have $500 in the bank. This is EndStage Capitalism not New Renaissance. This is a New Dark Ages...but we still have a few years to bunker up before we're fighting over bowls of stew mystery meat and broken wood pallets. Enjoy today so you have the resilience to survive tomorrow. The Gretans will disappear like lemmings in one generation.

[@Dave_of_Mordor]

most of our manufactures are done in those poorer countries. if they grow and have a rich life, all of our clothes, electronics and furniture will cost more. this sounds terrible to say but in a world where not everything is completely automated, we need these countries to remain the way they are. if you really want this to change, then stop believing in the ai feamongering and let it develop, so those people can live the life you think they should have

[@MrGoalie2012]

not everyone can be in a rich first-world country. If ppl wanna behave like barbarians in their countries and don't want to move forward as a society then let them, its not on the rest of the world to make sure they keep up.

[@alexanderp4060]

Wow why did nobody think of this!!! You’re a genius. Problem solved.

[@Tential1]

Climate change is important, not important enough for me to stop flying my private jet. But important enough that you need to give up your car.... Lol...

[@adimart2214]

The millions of cars on the road produce more carbon emissions than do a few private jets.

[@rajeshranjan3199]

​@@adimart2214so, giving up few private jets is far easy than to millions of cars.

[@adimart2214]

@@rajeshranjan3199 giving up a few private jets still don't equate to removing millions of cars off the road, not even close. In other words getting rid of the jets won't have much of an impact on the carbon footprint as would getting rid of all cars.

[@Dave_of_Mordor]

@@adimart2214 forget him. he seems to prioritize smartass remarks over actual solutions. it sad that there are more people agreeing with him than you

[@adimart2214]

@@Dave_of_Mordor thankyou for your support, wish you could follow me to every comment section lol

[@ronm9428]

Save the earth? Ha! It’s all about power and politics

[@ncard00]

Save humanity is more like it, the planet can survive anything we throw at it, including all our nukes, but we can’t. Very important difference.

[@ronm9428]

@@ncard00 Exactly. Humanity is not even a blink of the eye in geological time. In a million years (still onLy a blip) there will be no visible signs that we existed.

[@ericcomp7032]

We're riding this until the wheels fall off 🇺🇸 🌎

[@robertmarmaduke9721]

Our WA Governor has mandated all EVs by 2035 and just banned natural gas (and coal, obviously) powerplants, at the same time Google, Microsoft and Amazon are building huge Gigawatt blade warehouses for e-coom and AI Government over on the Columbia hydro dams. Boeing will be forced out of state, then their waterfront property turned into blue-roof Oprah condo towers for the Tech Elites.It's so sick it's comical!🐼🤡

[@Dave_of_Mordor]

we'll be fine. there are small process happening right now. we won't see extreme changes in our lifetime, but it's going to get better

[@scottekoontz]

@@Dave_of_Mordor Thanks Dave. I was thinking that all experts from countries across the planet were correct, but now that I see a random "it will be fine" post I know that all scientists are liars.

[@TennesseeJed]

Moloch wouldn't have it any other way.

[@frutbump8283]

Oh that beautiful beautiful white smoke, really triggers the woke.

[@prem9501]

I am baffled by the fact that anyone can pollute the air that we breathe legally and that too without any financial cost to them.

[@barrettbritt]

Well, what’s the alternative? How can anyone get to work without contributing to pollution? How can anyone put food on the table without contributing to the pollution? It’s a given. Our job is to find ways to fix the damage that’s been done, and find more efficient ways to do things going forward.

[@Tomren44]

I am baffled that you think you’re so innocent in all this when you consume energy everyday and contribute to pollution by merely existing

[@darinherrick9224]

@@barrettbritt the alternative is a cost at point of sale to compensate. The "true cost" is paid up-front. So a gallon of gas would cost $20 to offset the pollution and cleanup. Therefore, virtuous cycle, people would buy less, pollute less, because the incentive to NOT pollute is up-front.

[@barrettbritt]

@@darinherrick9224 no one should bear a financial penalty for something they can’t reasonably avoid. Imagine if stores charged you for breathing the air in their store… you can’t reasonably not breathe. Same concept. It’s unavoidable, so until an alternative is available, it’s unfair to be taxed/charged for it.

[@bru512]

This is kinda the same as the carbon tax

[@djayjp]

Super vague. Give quantifiable statistical information, charts, graphs, maps, timelines, projections, etc I actually want an actual answer to the question posed in the video title. This feels lazy AF.

[@Tential1]

ROFL. why? So you can come back and prove it's bs later? No. Go transition to evs, eat the bugs and ignore that I own stock in all of the transitions I'm telling you to make.

[@bru512]

Exactly.

[@Xeonerable]

You won't believe it anyways.

[@darinherrick9224]

Those have all already been provided ad nauseum and are not required (obviously). Those things are not up for debate. This is merely a summary.

[@bru512]

@@darinherrick9224 "Trust me".... right....

[@Hao-Japanese-reallife]

It seems like we're entering the second year of El Niño, and it's supposed to be hotter than last year. I don't like it at all.

[@Ceramic_disc]

What is El Nino?

[@KevinSmith-qi5yn]

@@Ceramic_disc Warmer than normal oceanic temperatures in the South Pacific cause increased rainfall along the south-west of the United States. This was mainly spurred by the high amount of water vapor from the Hunga Tonga - Hunga Ha'apai eruption in January 2022. The climate affects from a large volcanic eruption like this takes several years to dissipate.

[@robertmarmaduke9721]

You just outright lied! NOAA suggested in mid-2023 that we might enter a weak El Niño by last November but earlier this March NOAA said it appears we are moving back into La Niña _where we have been for the last two RECORD COLD years._ The government-academic 'Hottest Day on Record! last June said in the report "...simulated climate model..." It was FAKED! The editor of Science since resigned, saying climate papers were "pay advertising" with no (true) peer review and gross climate-model-enhanced data. *No thermometers were harmed in this Climate Reality© SCIENCE FICTION.*

[@Muddslinger0415]

We are completely screwed only about another decade of normality if we are lucky then all hell

[@Muddslinger0415]

@@KevinSmith-qi5ynthis isn’t caused by any eruption lmmfao get out of here

[@raulsantinolopezrodriguez8349]

Gracias por este reporte, tan importante. Es un proceso cíclico que podemos frenar un poco utilizando las energías que ya existen en conocimiento, pero no en la aplicación.

[@introvertsrock9843]

Need to look back at 2020 when ppl were allowed to WFH which meant fewer 🚗 on road Corporations need to bring this back

[@ncard00]

To all who think we will fix climate change in time, no. 1200 metric tons of co2 is emitted every second globally, 36.5 billion annually, and it hasn’t topped yet, it’s still increasing rapidly, likely approaching 50 billion tons annually in 2030. Why I don’t care about climate change, but about all the things related to it, like less air pollution, noise pollution from traffic, better public transit, more efficient and silent computers and chips, and just the whole world doing things more efficiently, with time and ressources, to challenge the current “normal” and how we normally do everything in society. And since the industrial revolution, about 1.5 trillion tons of co2 has been emitted worldwide, and with the average temperature almost at 1.5 degrees celsius over normal, that equals to about a 0.1 degrees celsius increase in globsl average temperature for every 100 billion metric tons co2 emitted. So you do the math, 50 billion a year means 0.1 degrees increase every 2 years! 2050 not looking good.

[@gamertimefriend1286]

"Wind and solar"...and nuclear holy moly

[@xDUnPr3diCtabl3]

Nuclear Waste 🫡

[@adimart2214]

Why would we want to build potential military or terrorist targets everywhere and God forbid another "9/11" occured and risk turning large swaths of areas into Chernobyl rendering them uninhabitable for hundreds of years, and that's assuming there is no nuclear accident like what occured in Chernobyl, no thanks! Wind, Solar, Hydro, and Geothermal is more than enough.

[@Dave_of_Mordor]

@@xDUnPr3diCtabl3 we have gotten better with handling nuclear energy

[@xDUnPr3diCtabl3]

@@Dave_of_Mordor Better, but still bad.

[@Dave_of_Mordor]

@@xDUnPr3diCtabl3 what are the bad?

[@marklasky3555]

How? Summer, Fall, Winter & Spring that's how

[@glichjthebicycle384]

What is absolutely always missing in these "climate videos" is the clear cut outlook on the future of our economies in relation to the policy decisions actually REQUIRED to fight climate change. Fighting climate change will not make everyone richer. There isn't some great hidden potential in terms of productivity increase that unlocks as soon as we start using green energy. We KNOW this because if there was then the free market wouldve already gone for that. People need to realise that fighting climate change will not be comfortable. Theres exactly two ways that we can fight climate change: 1. Use more efficient and "climate friendly" technology, which in either way costs money to develope and deploy. 2. Lower living standards for everyone and keeping poor countries poor because rich people use more resources. Obviously this way is extremely unpopular which is why politicans wont talk about it. The final policies will be somewhere in the middle. But no matter what we do: Climate Change is first and foremost a tax that absolutely everybody pays on absolutely everything. That money will go towards actually fighting climate change. It doesn't grow on trees. It's not going to be fun. It's not going to be popular. But it's the reality of things. So lets stop with this nonsense that climate change is some great opportunity that holds some sort of wonder miracle growth potential inside. Be honest with the people.

[@Tential1]

Everybody? When have you heard of regulations against yachts and private jets? Lol. This is for the poor. There have been zero proposed regulations that effect the rich.

[@darinherrick9224]

This is not true. We have people eating crap, drinking crap, breathing crap. That is a tax they are already paying. So yes, productivity, REAL productivity, will rise when people breathe clean air and drink clean water etc. There will be an upfront cost, but that's the upfront cost of eating veggies vs the astronomical cost of heart surgery.

[@jaikanths875]

Capitalism folks, Capitalism! US needs to learn from the Scandinavian countries!

[@vsznry]

WorkDay: PLZ update your job application process... WHY do we need to enter our previous work history EVERY time when you have our uploaded resume? What....HR/recruiters can't read?

[@misterfunnybones]

Nothing will happen until potable water & food are in very limited supply. The simple things that people take for granted that are the foundation of life.

[@ga1226]

Climate "crisis" = Climate grift.

[@Xocolatben]

What is the plan to stop or at least tax the emissions from volcanic activity?

[@KevinSmith-qi5yn]

When the government has enough money to subsidize a super villain. He will setup a headquarters within an active volcano and use it to produce diamonds that then are used to make a high-powered laser which he can use to take over the world.

[@jonathonhappel]

During the Medieval Warm Period it was actually warmer that it is now. Climate always changes. Extreme weather has always occurred throughout history. Stop the alarmism.

[@robertmarmaduke9721]

The post 11SEP Patriot Act Administrative State has metastasized under Biden. Their National Debt and the _interest_ (üsüry) on that Debt THEY created exceeds the US War budget. By the end of Biden2, that PRIVATE Fed ((Banks of London)) üsüry will exceed all Health and Human Services expenditures. So of course the Administrative State will push their Climate Reality© scheme into a New Dark Ages.

[@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885]

I'm happy to answer questions, though you should keep in mind that my 26-year-old Greenland work has been superseded by more-recent studies, especially for the Holocene (the last 11,000 years), and in particular by the studies that combine records from a half-dozen ice cores in central and northern Greenland. These studies were lead by the Copenhagen glaciology group, and you can find them on Google Scholar. Bo Vinther was one of the main authors. I read quickly through the "carbonbrief" article to which you linked, and it seems accurate to me. If you read that carefully, it should answer the main questions you have. Having said that, my direct responses RE my study published in 1997 (and its predecessor in 1995): 1. Those studies were primarily designed to examine the glacial to Holocene transition (20--10 kyr ago), and they are *not* the best way to address the issue of recent warming and its millennial context. They captured the start of the current warming but were not designed or capable of resolving it well. And even if they did, it's just for one location in central Greenland. Using one location is a valid approach if examining very long-timescale changes (e.g., the 20--10 kyr transition) but not at all a good idea for decadal-scale changes. The noise at the short timescale requires that you average a group of sites spanning a region. "Noise" means both failures of the proxy record to record climatic temperature accurately, and real climatological / meteorological variability that arises strongly from atmospheric dynamical patterns. 2. In the context of (1), the questions you raise about how accumulation and isotope calibrations are treated in different studies is irrelevant to your concern. Those are minor issues. 3. The entire approach of comparing recent observed warming to past variability *for the purpose of inferring mechanism* is fundamentally a weak argument because the timescale is too short to reconstruct past variability well or, more importantly, to reconstruct the climate forcings well. This argument will become stronger as warming proceeds. 4. Following from (3), the reason we know the recent warming is due to changes of the atmospheric greenhouse is that we can measure the effects on the radiative balance of the planet and compare it to uptake of energy by the planet (primarily manifest as ocean warming) and to other forcings such as solar intensity. Here's an analogy: you are sitting in your house on a cold evening. You pull a thick blanket over yourself and start to feel warmer. Why do you feel warmer? Was it the blanket trapping heat (yes, at least in part, it must be)? Was it your furnace working harder? Was it a sunbeam coming through a window? There are only a limited number of options, and you can know about the role of all of them. In this case, greenhouse gases are the blanket. The sun is your furnace, etc. 5. Following from (4), the evidence is overwhelming that most of the warming of Earth since 1980 has been caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gases and the feedbacks associated with warming. The warming from 1850 to 1950, however, contains a "natural variability" signal in addition to an anthropogenic signal, and this natural component can be regarded as the "end of the Little Ice Age," and it was partly solar and partly volcanic. It is unlikely that we will ever be able to give a confident and fairly precise statement about how much of this earlier warming was anthropogenic vs. natural (most of the warming occurred between 1910 and 1950, as I recall), but there are strong arguments that it was at least half anthropogenic. The problem is we will never be able to head backward in time and launch some satellites to get the measurements needed. Best wishes, Kurt Cuffey ................................................................................................................... Kurt M. Cuffey Professor, Department of Geography, University of California

[@ericcartmansh]

I love Jeffrey Sachs' glasses. Any way to find out which brand and model they are

[@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885]

Dollar General

[@RHODOAN]

If the economy is all you're worried about, then you really need to pull your head out the sand. Our very survival is at risk with a runaway greenhouse effect and the sixth great extinction in full swing. The biosphere we depend on is ever more rapidly being torn apart as we do nothing to mitigate the effects of these changes and even less to try to stop them.

[@smoke3144]

Where is my scheduled cargo ship programming?

[@woodchipgardens9084]

Persistent westerly winds have also dragged the current in one direction for over 20 years, increasing the speed and size of the clockwise current and preventing the fresh water from leaving the Arctic Ocean. This decades-long western wind is unusual for the region, where previously, the winds changed direction every five to seven year. Scientists have been keeping an eye on the Beaufort Gyre in case the wind changes direction again. If the direction were to change, the wind would reverse the current, pulling it counterclockwise and releasing the water it has accumulated all at once. "If the Beaufort Gyre were to release the excess fresh water into the Atlantic Ocean, it could potentially slow down its circulation. And that would have hemisphere-wide implications for the climate, especially in Western Europe," said Tom Armitage, lead author of the study and polar scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Fresh water released from the Arctic Ocean to the North Atlantic can change the density of surface waters. Normally, water from the Arctic loses heat and moisture to the atmosphere and sinks to the bottom of the ocean, where it drives water from the north Atlantic Ocean down to the tropics like a conveyor belt. This important current is called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and helps regulate the planet's climate by carrying heat from the tropically-warmed water to northern latitudes like Europe and North America. If slowed enough, it could negatively impact marine life and the communities that depend on it. "We don't expect a shutting down of the Gulf Stream, but we do expect impacts. That's why we're monitoring the Beaufort Gyre so closely," said Alek Petty, a co-author on the paper and polar scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The study also found that, the Beaufort Gyre is out of balance because of the added energy from the wind, the current expels that excess energy by forming small, circular eddies of water. While the increased turbulence has helped keep the system balanced, it has the potential to lead to further ice melt because it mixes layers of cold, fresh water with relatively warm, salt water below. The melting ice could, in turn, lead to changes in how nutrients and organic material in the ocean are mixed, significantly affecting the food chain and wildlife in the Arctic. The results reveal a delicate balance between wind and ocean as the sea ice pack recedes under climate change. "What this study is showing is that the loss of sea ice has really important impacts on our climate system that we're only just discovering," said Petty. News Media Contacts Rexana Vizza / Matthew Segal Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena Calif 818-393-1931 / 818-354-8307

[@tahirisaid2693]

Engaging with books has significantly elevated my perspective on investing. True wealth isn't built through mere savings; financial freedom stems from strategic investments. I've learned that accumulating wealth hinges on making prudent investment decisions.

[@uscguis]

There is no climate crisis.

[@wilburshaw9330]

You know, every major city in the world smelled like manure in the centuries before cars & electricity. That was real pollution! Lol

[@thebrowndoecorporation5564]

Somehow we will need to plant more trees, don't know where though because space on this planet is limited for such use. Possibly figure out wys to green the desert.

[@lokesh303101]

The Greencover met by Water Availability from Water Bodies does solve Fundamental Climate Change.

[@benkmarchant]

I'm almost 40. I have been hearing about climate change making the world unlivable since I was in elementary school. In fact I remember learning that FL would be uninhabitable by 2020.

[@superblondeDotOrg]

FL is already uninhabitable. Look at who lives there and who governs there.

[@benkmarchant]

@@superblondeDotOrg hyperbole. Miami is one the biggest cities in the US

[@communismisthefuture6503]

And it is unlivable.

[@benkmarchant]

@@communismisthefuture6503 millions would disagree. And besides, the point is that climate alarmism, that has been historically inaccurate, is doing more harm than good. I believe climate change is real. However I can appreciate why people are skeptical after being told for so long that XYZ place will soon be underwater.

[@Agtsmirnoff]

And that Antarctica would disappear completely during the South Hemisphere summer by 2016.

[@amin7361]

instantly stopped watching as soon as Robert Reich came to video. he is the most disqualified economist in the world

[@user-tx6mh8mu7d]

I glad to have an adviser who is excellent in what he's doing , you changed my entire life and I will continue to preach and song your praises on your behalf for the whole world to hear you saved me from huge financial debt with just a small investment, thank you Andras Bohm!!!!

[@user-mv3hr7uf5e]

I was owing a loan of $192,000 to my bank , no longer in debt after I invested $25,000 and got my payout several times for the past two months. God bless Andras Bohm.......

[@user-tx6mh8mu7d]

Run a quick online research with his name...

[@user-tx6mh8mu7d]

his website is widely available online..

[@user-mv3hr7uf5e]

ANDRAS BOHM is simply outstanding

[@AQuietNight]

If adverse climate change means we don't have to listen to Jeffery Sachs anymore, I'm all for adverse climate change.

[@geraldjunior4235]

'Psychological warfare'

[@Baseds__Backup_Account_3]

It would be best if they found a much greater use of solar power at this point tbh or a brand-new endless renewable energy, somehow, you know tbh.

[@woodchuck003]

Ask someone with solar panels on my house I can tell you that the biggest positive is that the politicians have decided that they enabled me as a relatively wealthy person to stay more relatively wealthy.

[@zettaiengineer4202]

Covid was an example of adaptation to a singular crisis. Nonetheless the adaptation took years, $ trillions, and millions of lives. Can we adapt to more frequent and multidimensional crises? It will be a race to stay civil long enough to adapt before "entropy" overwhelms civilization.

[@Tony-kq6py]

By volume, the dry air in Earth's atmosphere is about 78.08 percent nitrogen, 20.95 percent oxygen, and 0.93 percent argon, adding up to 99.96 percent. A brew of trace gases accounts for the other approximately 0.04 percent, including the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and ozone. To think that a small increase (200 parts per million in the last hundred years) of carbon dioxide would affect the weather is absurd.

[@hosnimubarak8869]

Bad Argument/Myth #9: CO2 only makes a small portion of the atmosphere. 1) He wasn't driving drunk, he just had a trace of blood alcohol; 0.08%. 2) Don't worry about your iron deficiency, iron is only 4.4 ppm of your body’s atoms. 3) Ireland isn't important; it's only.066%) of the world population. 4)That ibuprofen pill can't do you any good; it's only 3 ppm of your body weight 5)The Earth is insignificant, it's only 3 ppm of the mass of the solar system. 6) Your children can drink that water, it only contains a trace of arsenic (0.01 ppm is the WHO and US EPA limit).

[@Hanharrftw]

stop the wars, invest in the country. A ton can happen if we cut Military spending.

[@jakeseraphin7143]

I would love some actionable advice in this video beyond “government”.

[@communismisthefuture6503]

Go vegan right away. Animal agriculture is the #1 cause of global warming

[@KevinSmith-qi5yn]

They only interviewed climate advocates and socialists. Naturally their solution is more socialism.

[@TStark-vj2wo]

@@KevinSmith-qi5yn So they should interview Trump who thinks it's a Chinese hoax and the republican's offer nothing in response to this. Crist, I'm surprised Trump and the republicans haven't blamed climate change on illegal immigration at this point. Oh, what 'more socialism' are you going on about? Provide actual 'true' socialist policies that have been introduced. Unfettered capitalism is very alive and well and unthreatened in the US and many parts of the world.

[@KevinSmith-qi5yn]

@@communismisthefuture6503 It's the public ownership of the means of production.

[@communismisthefuture6503]

@@KevinSmith-qi5yn Now explain how we can have ‘more’ socialism if we have zero right now.

[@mehmetkaya359]

Ban the private jet ? but you can't afford it for rich layer.

[@jamespark3510]

Just a bunch of email fowarding, hands off working, over paid people just talking talking talking talking as usual......anyone can jump on a call on the news and say 'global warming is a problem and something should be done about it, but not my job'

[@perazzderap]

imagine we abandon fosil fuels... imagine we source 2/3 of energy from Sun... imagine Krakatau erupts and dust blocks the Sun for 2 years... cause it happened before 🤔

[@nuclearcatapult9543]

Next on CNBC, how would human extinction affect the economy?

[@woodchipgardens9084]

2023 is the worst wildfire season in Canadian history | APTN News Pine Needles and Grass Seed Burn Hot in the Desert Wind

[@ByGriPhone]

I know Vito's bottom was impacted, if that's what you're referring to.

[@lowbudgetmic]

Thanos was right 😮💛

[@adimart2214]

he is inevitable?

[@PulseNews-gu9fe]

Probably, each of us has often wondered what the future holds for you? There is a lot of evidence that everyone's future already exists. Quite a lot of facts have been collected that indicate the inevitability of events lying in the future. These facts also indicate that it is impossible to avoid the predestined.

[@geraldjunior4235]

Facts

[@Baseds__Backup_Account_3]

The climate and the economy are two completely separate things, yet apparently very similar to each other in this case for some reason, lol.

[@markmiller8903]

There is no climate crisis or sea levell rise.

[@cristosocorromedina580]

Subtítulos en español

[@user-cw1fx2bw1e]

If the US want to increase their economy I suggest they should've develop fusion reactor.

[@adimart2214]

that involves nuclear, it's a no go

[@user-cw1fx2bw1e]

@@adimart2214 Fusion is a clean energy like how it powers the sun.

[@sacredcowpictures8959]

These institutional videos actually greenwash the subject. There is no way Roubini would agree with the producers' deliberately included assertion of a 25 year timeframe for transition. Try ten..

[@althunder4269]

What climate crisis?

[@BitsTribe]

All talks and suggestions but no action.

[@rayshepherd2479]

Currently the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is .04%. It has been mich higher in the past and life flourished. Dinosaurs did just fine with temperatures 5-10 C above today's temperatures. Probably why they got so big because the warmer temperatures and higher CO2 levels aided plant/food production. Since man has been on earth we seem to have done much better during warm spells than cold ones. If you actually look at the data there are many more deaths from cold than heat. The amount of food crops has skyrocketed as the temperature has wamed. The total desths from climate catastrophies is down 90+% in the last 100 years. By the way it has been much colder and hotter in earths history before mankind. So what truly is the optimum temperature and are we actually making it worse or is most of the temperature increase natural?

[@Muddslinger0415]

Co2 hasn’t been this high for millions of years you don’t know what your talking about

[@AQuietNight]

@@Muddslinger0415 The Dinosaurs were around 65 million years ago. It wasn't CO2 that killed them.

[@ronm9428]

ThE earth had significantly less land during the hot dinosaur age because there were no polar ice caps. Are you ok with ocean front property in Missouri? That’s what it would be like without ice caps.

[@rayshepherd2479]

@@ronm9428 Around 20,000 years ago New York was under a mile of ICE. So there have been major changes in the climate both much hotter and colder.

[@josephpark9802]

Wish there were some opposing views in this video

[@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885]

There is!! You should read Joseph Fourier's 1824 paper - two hundred years ago he published how "dark energy" (infrared radiation) would heat up Earth due to "the effects of human industry" !!! So the science lies have been going on for two hundred years!! All the opposing views are just more lies. Obviously the science for two hundred years has been completely wrong.

[@shadylane7988]

Oh yeah...duh...thats helpful? Like we already dont know this stuff...

[@anubaral]

so nothing said...

[@jarrodyuki7081]

cfls and reduce carbon emissions!!!!!!!!!!

[@Zeitgeistboxee]

Don't look up.

[@stevenhill3136]

We’re getting there fast. Renewable energy already beats fossil fuels on cost globally and the gap is only growing

[@robertmarmaduke9721]

That's an astonishingly totally false equivalence! Solar would die tomorrow if it wasn't pushed with tax rebates. Central grid solar havsgone bankrupt. Even Musk's Solar City scheme was bankrupt where he merged it. It's illusion delusion - the most unreliable intermittent grid destroying unaffordable wind and solar power fantasy imaginable!

[@Boxagami]

Did you see the hail damage to all the solar panels here in Tx yet? Dumb idea and solar panels are made with toxic metals.

[@skullandbones1832]

💚

[@user-it9vs3vq2z]

It means that you have an excuse to hook up your cronies. That's all they do with it. You're supposed to live in a capitalist country. A capitalist country is not supposed to be monolithic. Engineering is not supposed to be monolithic. You're supposed to come up with your own solutions to bad weather. You're not supposed have one global entity controlling all of humanity. Things like construction are not supposed to be monolithic. banking is not supposed to be monolithic. But fake engineer computer dorks get like microsoft or some crap to do the same thing as everyone else. That's not engineering. There is no design in that. That's like if a buy a car and work as a taxi driver with the same yellow cab as everyone else and then say I'm an engineer. The guy who painted cabs yellow isn't an engineer just like the uber computer database guy isn't an engineer. the yellow pages isn't engineering.

[@437cosimo]

The world does NOT have the minerals or money to do this!

[@Monk_Duck]

Renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels for virtually every country, and EV price is dropping like a stone.... doesn't seem impossible.

[@tombeegeeeye5765]

The cost of beef is a direct effect of global climate change. Droughts in Texas, Central America and Argentina and a few years ago in Australia are driving the price of beef up up up. weather messed up coffee harvest and cacao is 8000 a ton up from 2000.

[@cweaver4080]

My plan is to get as rich as possible so I can build an ark in the mountains and then I don't care what happens to the rest of the world. We need more tax cuts for billionaires!

[@auro1986]

how? american economy affects climate and results in crisis

[@j.trulyrandom]

Balancing wealth and climate is a challenge

[@piku5637]

Animal agriculture and capítalísm have gotta go🌱🎶

[@MrGoalie2012]

wrong, commie

[@henryterranauta9100]

Great issue but a rehash

[@mikebostic9518]

It seems as if we should begin to take the enviro seriously.

[@Mattyoung5150]

Its a scam.

[@deld210]

Blame this on the Chinese. God knows what the hell they are putting in to the air.

[@geraldjunior4235]

Adoption Our Culture In white culture

[@skyscraperfan]

I come from a country that is much colder than the world average. We freeze six to seven months per year. So a few degrees more are really appreciated, even if they come with more extreme weather. Our biggest economic rivals are China, India and the US. Climate change will hurt those countries much more than us. So companies and rich individuals might leave those hot countries and move to a colder country. That could mean that millionaires and billionaires will come here in masses and invest a lot of money here.

[@KevinSmith-qi5yn]

Doubt it, the advocates are buying beach front properties. They don't believe in their cause, just the money and power they get from it.

[@jarrodyuki7081]

gettign my new atm card tommmorw.

[@cristosocorromedina580]

😮😮😮😢

[@Acquisition1913]

World government con job.

[@jarrodyuki7081]

onyl facsim adncommunsi msacn save the wolrd after covid!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@groove9tube]

Very one sided story. A bunch of fataliists. Roubini still batting .001.

[@TheWizard856]

We need to redesign cities such that vehicles are not needed near as much. Maybe organize blocks so that people can live, work, and shop within walking distance with an electric rail system to move freight between them. We can hire more rural folks to work remote more remote jobs as rural has no good way to create public transit infrastructure. We need to put pressure on these high pollution countries too. I feel like we need an all the above approach at this point.

[@blazer9547]

India will be uninhabitable 😢

[@brycesattler2301]

☯️

[@jarrodyuki7081]

circumcised under islamci nad jewish law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! police for 110k a year and navy for 80 k ayear.

[@souravjaiswal-jr4bj]

People are taking cc too lightly and something that will happen in distant future. IMO, 2020 treaty removed the protective SO2 layer, we will breach 2 C by 2030 under current pace. Expect a massive flood of migrants moving north in every continent.

[@geraldjunior4235]

White culture

[@communismisthefuture6503]

Black culture

[@LostMySauce]

This video was such a waste of time. Everyone says everything and yet nothing at the same time

[@SanDiegoOfficial]

To non believers, If climate change is not real, why are all home insurers pulling out.

[@Haveyoueverbeenswallowed]

Great point.

[@robertmarmaduke9721]

If you ride around on the EV magic bus, you'll see the absolute train wreck that Greens and Blues and Pinks have created. Insurers like every one are in business for prosperity, not a lump of coal in their -Chrïstmas- Festïvus stocking.

[@MrGoalie2012]

because insurance is a scam

[@uche007us]

Pulling out of people building in forest fire zones? Or flood zones? Be more specific

[@jarrodyuki7081]

s-o++a cross sections!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! dont talk about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! join the police for 100k a year or navy for 80k a year..............

[@davidcrane372]

I hope we are able to change, leave that gas car and just go electric. It has very little difference. Or your grandchildren may not have a future to look to

[@lancejepsen701]

Oh, leaping onto the electric bandwagon, are we? You make it sound like swapping a gas guzzler for a battery bulker is as simple as changing socks. The audacity! It's as if you think flipping a switch will magically undo centuries of environmental damage. And here you are, championing for a future brighter than a LED bulb, while conveniently ignoring the delightful complexities of mining for those batteries. Ah, yes, let's all hold hands and skip down the lithium lane, shall we? Your concern for the grandchildren is touching, truly, but maybe we should focus on not tripping over the power cord of your utopian electric dream first.

[@davidcrane372]

@@lancejepsen701 over time mining of lithium will become more cleaner, unlike gas cars which will continue polluting the atmosphere. If we want to save the world and create a better future for the next generation it's time to move to net zero and ditch gas cars

[@Monk_Duck]

​@@lancejepsen701actually they are much better and a good step forwards. Not sure anyone has suggested it fixes everything, just limits future impact.

[@DelusionalDoug]

The first thing the USA should electrify is the border wall.

[@JogBird]

2023 wasnt the hottest on record, it'll be the coolest for the 4000 years

[@KevinSmith-qi5yn]

But you didn't adjust your computer model to ignore the outlier 2023 temperature and instead use made-up numbers. Also 2023 was hotter than normal which is the reason we are in an El Nino cycle primarily caused by a volcanic eruption in 2022. It was the prior decade that was colder than normal. Most of the weather phenomena we experienced in the 2010s are attributed to lower-than-normal temperatures.

[@RichardKing-sx6xc]

Climate Change Freaks 😂😆😅🤣

[@romeou4965]

EVs emit more nanoparticle matter pollution from their brakes and tires than regular cars, because EVs are heavier.

[@timisaacson5509]

There is an upfront cost for many of these green projects, but if you look at the cost over 10 or 20 years some of them are cheaper than continuing to do what we have been doing. For example, build bike infrastructure so people can ride bikes and ebikes instead of driving cars. It costs far more to build and maintain roads for cars than it does for bikes. kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJa7koZqhsaoqbM

[@Kevin-oj2uo]

But Trump says climate change is a hoax.

[@vickiroman189]

And once again, he is right.

[@geraldjunior4235]

So what's is going on now if Climate change is hox why don't you see it happening under your 🐽

[@jimmaag4274]

And he would be correct

[@vickiroman189]

@@jimmaag4274 100%

[@RichardKing-sx6xc]

This is the only thing I 100% agree with *BLUMPF!!!* 🤣😆😂

[@user-zy9nd6cq4w]

😊

[@oraliaherrera2826]

The ungodly laws being passed is bringing judgement from God

[@Monk_Duck]

Which god?

[@SC-rc4rs]

The climate itself is not so much of an issue. Humans are excellent at adapting. We have done this for millennia. Clueless virtue signaling politicians and their activist supporters on the other hand can cause real harm.

[@Bfould3120]

Wow, useless video. Just a bunch of people stating the obvious problem and no solutions or even suggestions on hope to take action.

[@justinsane7128]

ClimateHoax