Fantastic and hilarious video! I can't believe I didn't know about the infinity focus markings on some lenses in combination with their aperture number. You're the first video I've seen on the subject that mentions this!
@3d8d Жыл бұрын
No has explained it in such a good manner as you have explained , amazing sir.
@PullMyFocus Жыл бұрын
Thanks a ton
@Stone11082 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this, one of the better explanations, i’m getting there!! Think i’ve watched to many variants on hyperfocus so created my own little circle of confusion! Thanks. 👌
@amateurphotographerassocia59652 жыл бұрын
Great, we'll share with our group ;)
@PullMyFocus2 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Let us know if they have any questions.
@RockWILK Жыл бұрын
This is an awesome video. I use Zone focusing for my filmmaking all the time. That way I can use all of my vintage lenses. Thanks for sharing such valuable information.
@ihproductionsncr Жыл бұрын
This nailed it for me. Thank you.
@fotografkennethlund2 жыл бұрын
8:11 hilarious hahahahahah went from Jamaican to South African to Scottish accent LOL
@RongDuck6 жыл бұрын
THAT was nothing short of awesome. Great job to everyone involved!
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dave. I will let the team know.
@ericgeorge54835 жыл бұрын
What a fabulous informative video!!
@bhartwigutube6 жыл бұрын
Loved that you got into the lens window readings.... and then screamed in agony as you left without expanding on it...
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Do you mean the section at 5:30 min? I did explain how to set the hyperfocus markings there but tell what you want to know and I'll expand on it. We don't want you in agony!
@mdel53846 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this. I've watched god knows how many videos explaining this, to no avail. Yours is what made me truly understand. THANKS AGAIN!
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
You're welcome M Del. Makes our day to know we got it right and helped somebody out.
@najemo20246 жыл бұрын
The best explanation on youtube by far...👍
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Naveen. Appreciate the feedback and hope it was helpful.
@mrtiff995 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Struggling to focus on near and far objects today. This info is really helpful
@PullMyFocus5 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Glad to hear it was helpful.
@johnrasmussen37526 жыл бұрын
seriously good vid .. both information presentation and humour.
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Thanks, John, glad you liked it.
@websitesthatneedanem6 жыл бұрын
Funny bits.... are Very Funny! More funny moments please! Love the accents all over that place, brilliant!
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Martin. Glad Spuds got that b-roll to show off how talented these guys are.
@Twisted_Sound5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant explanation!! I only have a question, you said that when it's very bright you can shoot with a tight aperture.well, when i want to shoot hyperfocal indoors or nighttime or on a dark environment what choices do i have? bigger ISO? light the scene? what's the best option? i really thank you.
@PullMyFocus5 жыл бұрын
Well you hit the nail on the head. You need either a much higher ISO and/or more light. The best option would be to light the scene because the higher the ISO the more grain but...more lights require a higher budget as you'll need high output lights (eg HMI's). But not, a sunlit day gives you 10,000 foot candles (fc). An overcast day, 100 fc. Inside, when I shoot, with soft box lights, it's usually around 80 to 160 fc. So 10,000 fc's is a lot!
@Twisted_Sound5 жыл бұрын
@@PullMyFocus Oh man, I haven't heard foot candle term for a long time!! (I live in europe ,so here we use lux ) . So if i understood correctly, it's not such a big deal to exposure right at nighttime at f/8 or f/11 ? i will need approximately a 800 to 1700 lux light source witch isn't a huge light source ,am i right? sorry for comprehensive approach, but it is really worthy information for me! i really appreciate the info mr. Frank !
@PullMyFocus5 жыл бұрын
@@Twisted_SoundNo problem at all. Love these questions. Bright sunlight, 100,000 Lux. To match that in a 1x1 meter square you would need 100,000 lumens at 1 meter away. If you're lighting a room that is 3x3 meters, 300,000 lumens. but that's with the light 1 meter away. If you intend to use hyperfocal distance, that means you intend to see and therefore light a very wide area. That would be a lot of lumens. An 18 watt HMI par lamp, if I'm calculating properly, puts out 150,000 lumens.
@Twisted_Sound5 жыл бұрын
@@PullMyFocus Those calculation are for outdoors shooting?? For sure i cannot use HMI lamps because they are super expensive haha! but i dont think that 18 watt HMI par would put out 150.000 lumens ?! maybe u meant 18000 watt ( daylight HMI ) ? i am really confused and after all i think that the answer is that's difficult to light a night scene to shoot hyperfocal ,right?
@PullMyFocus5 жыл бұрын
@@Twisted_Sound Yes, sorry, 1800 watts (I'll edit my post). It puts out 92 lumens per watt. And yes, it's difficult to light a night scene but don't be discouraged by lumens and lux and exposure. It's not easy. By the way, your footage, especially your night shoots, look fantastic. And, "ya su".
@DylanSwain6 жыл бұрын
Yay I got a shoutout! That Aussie accent was pretty decent to be honest 😂
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah, by the way, meant to tell you, you got a shout out. lol. I told them to switch to Aussie accents just for the hell of it, and well, they did.
@thecourtneyshaffer6 жыл бұрын
Oh my gosh - you got the Hugh Jackman is a kangaroo and you’re a wallaby bit!!! 🤣
@DarkGunner453 жыл бұрын
How is this applicable doing every scenario like you can't be taking pictures of people and take out a tape measure person will question how good you are as a photographer
@PullMyFocus3 жыл бұрын
This isn't photography though but film and video where you're recording continuously while the camera and the actors are moving. This means you may have to adjust focus during a shot. On a film set, the 1st AC measures every shot and marks each position the actor is at on their focus ring. Even on a static shot. Their main job during a take is maintaining focus.
@thothheartmaat28332 жыл бұрын
im trying to figure out ho to do hyperfocal length for zoomed in portraits and it looks like its just not possible.. every time you zoom in the hyperfocal length and near focal length goes further into the background so you have to zoom all the way out and include the feet and then it works but if you just want a waist shot or something else then it doesnt work.. if you love bokeh then this is great but if you want the background in focus it just doesnt work ever..
@PullMyFocus2 жыл бұрын
Correct. The only way to get even close is to shoot at a super small aperture.
@skd6 жыл бұрын
Congrats on your 1k subs :) Pop up that beer.According to KZbin, you are a true partner now. Very easy to understand what you explain, you guys are the best at what you do. I would not trust someone more on youtube. And BTW, there are exceptions. Chuck Norris is always on focus, no matter what lens you have, how dark it is and how close he is.
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tudor. We still need to reach 240,000 watch minutes a month to hit the new partner threshold but we're close. And yes, thank you, as you are correct about Chuck Norris. He is always in focus, except maybe after he punches, or kicks, someone in the head.
@daVinzyVisuals6 жыл бұрын
Great Video Frank, Looking forward to the mathematics of hyperfocal distance. In the next video suggest some Great DOF calculator App for iOS and Android with a very brief example of it. Thanks.
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
Thanks daVinzy and yeah, I will get into some apps. Main thing with them is to test them against charts as there's some grayness there.
@gabrielnoguti68046 жыл бұрын
I liked, first time here but really enjoy, have a video about landscapes our wide lens ? keep this gj XD
@PullMyFocus6 жыл бұрын
We don't have a video on landscapes or wide lens. That is a tough subject, as the wider the lens, the smaller everything in the background gets, which means is the landscape.
@zbatevp-vlogs6108 ай бұрын
I saw a pot of gold 😂
@harrylangdon4914 жыл бұрын
Very good except the payoff, the hyperfocus distance, should have been slowly or more clearly defined at the nearest point in focus. Or did i get that wrong?
@PullMyFocus4 жыл бұрын
The hyperfocus distance is not the nearest point in focus. It is the point you focus on (the distance that point is from the camera). There is then an area in front of that point towards the camera that is in focus and an area behind it in focus, in this case, to infinity. The area in front of the hyperfocus distance, it's point nearest the camera that is in focus, would be the "nearest point" in focus. Let me know if that's helpful.
@royksk6 жыл бұрын
I may not be an actor but, being from England, I do know the difference between a Irish and Scottish (which these were more like) accents. But a great video nonetheless.
@charruaporelmundo5 жыл бұрын
I wish one day you will switch to metric system, still very useful info .
@PullMyFocus5 жыл бұрын
OMG, I wish we did too. It would be so much easier for everything.
@charruaporelmundo5 жыл бұрын
Pull My Focus Pull My Focus I got lost with foot, feet, inches, (4’.8.4”? ...Chinese for me 🤔😁) but the info is excellent. Will do some self portraiture . Thank you 👌
@PullMyFocus5 жыл бұрын
@@charruaporelmundo You are welcome, glad it helped. In future, I'll see if we can use both metric and imperial.
@jessie_kits12215 жыл бұрын
it's hard when you're in events.
@SeanDIY5 жыл бұрын
You look like the guy from Ferris Beuler
@GoA72506 жыл бұрын
Why was he kissing Tony?
@beverlymarbaniang96755 жыл бұрын
So dramatic
@Stone11082 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this, one of the better explanations, i’m getting there!! Think i’ve watched to many variants on hyperfocus so created my own little circle of confusion! Thanks. 👌
@PullMyFocus2 жыл бұрын
I like that, created your own circle of confusion.