"I CAN FORCIBLY REMOVE YOU" 🤡 THE CLOWN OF CABOT CIRCUS

[@scoosethom8441]

Captain birds eye was hilarious he didn't have a clue what he was talking about and then along came his boyfriend who was even more clueless 😂😂😂

[@ploppyploppy6554]

No fish fingers were harmed in the making of this rainbow moment .

[@philipthomas2918]

Laurel and Hardy are alive!

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

…apart from the fact that he was absolutely correct. Under Common Law he had the right to remove him using reasonable force where necessary.

[@Guccit865]

Yeah he was his boyfriend 😂

[@nosmokeey]

It might’ve been seaman stains or the cabin boy 😂😂😂

[@alijay68]

hes even got his trousers tucked in his boots like the thugs of the met, he realy thinks he a cop,. haha

[@roscothesecond6722]

It's to stop the crap from soaking into his socks

[@Des-n8b]

oh wow trousers tucked in is that the best you can do

[@markhamilton9834]

Always wondered where Uncle Bulgaria went to after the Wombles.👍😂🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@dereksmith4177]

I thought he was capt birdseye

[@markhamilton9834]

@@dereksmith4177 That was in a past life🤣👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@connect4glyn]

In Bristol again then , Cabot circus with a clown in security . He likes to be the star of the show doesn't he !

[@rogermellie8068]

Corporations only get planning permission to build if they give the public certain rights of access

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

yeah it's called right of passage , the public has the right to cross the entrance when walking from one pavement to the pavement on the other side of the drive entrance of the corporation, buisness, society, etc etc etc ... the public does not have the right to enter the property and "squat" there and take pictures or video of any/everything the see .

[@rolkis1942]

@@GeorgeCeline2323 in east europe and russia we have more freedom than in uk 😂 we can film in banks in civil court everything in puplic, if stupid security call cops cops get him a fine for false reports, uk is in the ass

[@ssjgotenks2009]

@@GeorgeCeline2323 worng fool the arr ifgtha law sya we flim any thign we can see lrian it fool

[@philldownes8685]

@@GeorgeCeline2323 oh how wrong yo uare.. if your allowed access then anything yo ucan see you can take a photo off, where you got your version i would like to know, was it beano or bajooka joe ?

[@daviddoyle5291]

they dress as though they are storm troopers, too much NETFLIX.

[@clivesmith2886]

Security are always clueless and unprofessional, yet again

[@supSuicide]

Fairly tough gig tbh, boss giving you shit about removing people who you know you don’t have the right to move, you basically have to ask them to jog on and hope they do, if not 20 minutes of arguing go by and you aren’t exactly pleased with yourself

[@PhyllisGlassup2TheBrim]

To be fair though, if they had a high IQ they wouldn't have to be security would they? Mind you, I suppose if it was a choice of flipping burgers or strutting about in a uniform trying to dress up like a paramilitary man, I can see why they would choose the latter. And before anyone comments, no, I have nothing against anyone who flips burgers for an existence I've done it myself when I was between jobs and when my own business was going through a quiet time and enjoyed myself immensely.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

…but totally correct in this case. He is an agent of the landowner and has the right to use reasonable force if necessary under Common Law.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

@@supSuicide…apart from the fact that he HAS the right under Common Law to remove him. You’re completely wrong.

[@supSuicide]

@@MrAndrewFarrow I was actually projecting a little too much from my own experience. Made a generalised statement rather than a relevant one. But yes, you are correct

[@TheSadButMadLad]

People don't lose their human rights the moment they step on to some particular piece of private property. Article 8 of the human rights applies all the time.

[@WorksopGimp]

UK has clear laws on public areas and access

[@TheSadButMadLad]

@@WorksopGimp Some laws do exist. But they aren't that clear. That's because case law to back them up and refine how they are to be applied still need to be created. A few cases have done some work on it. One set out that a corridor in a block of flats was a public place because it was used as a shortcut to go from a train station to a shopping precinct. Another said that a path to a hostel was not a public place because it was only used by residents of the hostel.

[@jogon331]

Sad the copper

[@Riki.B]

If they got a badge means they can talk shite

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

What the eff has Article 8 of the human rights got to do with it ? you are standing on private property and as such have NO right to stay and film if the owner or anyone of authority says you must leave , how pretentious are you ,,, how badly are you looking for trouble , do you think that if that guy physically removes you that you have ANY legal recours? you're just looking for trouble so you can claim to be a victim , you have NO valable reason to point your camera at ANY shop, bureau, office, company, factory etc entrance . You're just pointing and waiting for someone to come out so you can start an argument ,,, you do know that in USA people are bieng taken to court where the judge orders psychiatric evaluation and the cameraman is bieng sent to a psychiatric hospital for treatment ... or simply locked up in prison ... Grow up and get a job, earn your wages pay your taxes and earn some respect ...

[@scotttchviski6706]

If that is a public right of way then you're permitted to use it. The police can't 'move you on'.

[@7king8debs79]

That right was withdrawn though

[@scotttchviski6706]

@@7king8debs79 They are not permitted to withdraw it, if it is a public right of way. The whole idea behind a PROW is it can't be closed off and the public can't be refused the right to use it (emergency circumstances are an obvious exception).

[@7king8debs79]

@@scotttchviski6706 but if it is permissive access?

[@scotttchviski6706]

@@7king8debs79 He's on Temple Way Underpass in Bristol. It's maintained at public expense and the street is open to the public. The crossings are there to prevent people having to walk on the busy road (A4044).

[@112boatman]

Should have took one for the thumbnail on grinder

[@duncanwalker1347]

Under section 33 of the 1972 Criminal Justice act any area that is open to the public and where they have unrestricted access to as in no gates or signs it is classed as public even if it is private

[@davidsmith5523]

We are proud to live in a FREE country. But do everything we can to put an end to as many freedoms as we can. A world war was fought to safeguard freedom. Yet give a man a high viz jacket and a job descrption and he does the work of the third reich on his own. Just doing my job.

[@davewarren2849]

What a Muppet employee

[@fourfoxsake8044]

You cant be trespassed from a public right of way !!! He'll learn his lesson when he tries this shite on the wrong person and spends his hospital stay learning about the law !

[@budgetnuclearweapons7858]

That's right, but it wasn't a public ROW. It was private property with what's known as a "permissive path". It means trespass law can still be enforced.

[@fourfoxsake8044]

@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 If an owner of a permissive path wants to restrict access, it must be done to ALL users of the path. An owner would have NO rights to restrict access to certain groups or people. It's however unlikely that a city centre property would have control over the pavement as it would be considered part of the public highway. Without access to a path, pedestrians would be forced to walk on the roads - as this is clearly dangerous planning permission would not be granted without guarantees of public access rights.

[@budgetnuclearweapons7858]

@@fourfoxsake8044 Eh...? What ARE you on about? A "permissive path" or indeed any permissive access or entry it what it says - dependant upon a permission. So long as discrimination legislation is complied with, it rests entirely at the land owner or occupier's (or anyone acting under their authority) discretion. Its not a "right" so you can include or exclude whoever you want.

[@fourfoxsake8044]

@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 you're obviously very confident in your assessment - now back it up with some case law . . . . . .!

[@budgetnuclearweapons7858]

@@fourfoxsake8044 I'm confident because I've been dealing with public and private easements for decades now. Nobody ever did my research for me, so I'll be buggered if I'm doing yours. Its "basics" anyway...- like asking for legislation that stealing is illegal.

[@joeblow2069]

Wow that was a lot of people trespassing on their precious land. 😮‍💨😮‍💨

[@blobrana8515]

A member of the public is not responsible for the security of a private building. It is up to the business owners to secure their building. A member of the public is under no obligation to consider the feeling or security concerns of any staff member or security guard employed by a private business.

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

the public has the responsability to stay on the pavement during their walk along the pavement , they can't leave the pavement to go to the private property and stay there and film.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

…but if you stray onto private land and any implied right of access is removed they may use reasonable force where necessary to remove you.

[@blobrana8515]

@@MrAndrewFarrow there has to be implied public access and no signage saying private property etc. Tresspass is a civil matter and it requires a court order to remove you, but the landowner can indeed use reasonable force to remove you. The problem is that the area may have implied public access and therefore the landowner needs to remove the access to you and then they can ask you to leave. Use of reasonable force by the landowner may constitute an assault and discrimination claims (if applicable) could also be made.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

@@blobrana8515 you’re getting a bit confused. It does NOT need a court order. Some organisations such as Councils, get a Civil Court Order because it is a criminal offence to breach one. Being public bodies they don’t like to get involved in a punch up. But Common Law is clear and has been since 1189; a landowner may use reasonable force when necessary to remove you. Any implied right of access can be revoked, as here, by telling him. You give an implied right of access by having a gate and a letter box. As soon as you see TV Licensing and say “go away” that implied right is gone. Use of REASONABLE force CANNOT be assault. If you so much as raise a hand the other way that’s assault, possibly with aggravating factors as he was carrying out a lawful activity. If he takes a piece of 4 by 2 and beats you to a pulp; THAT may well be illegal.

[@alanjones4188]

Imagine being their age and that was the best you can do for a job.

[@budgetnuclearweapons7858]

Except they DID know, it was the cameraman that don't know the law.

[@philldownes8685]

@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 your so wrong. and there is nothing to stop a group of 200 protesters walking across that crossing back and forth all day long and DO NOT have to stop to let a vehicle go by.... pedestrians now have rights before any vehicles, then its bycycles then its motor bikes then cars then bigger vehicles.. lear n the laws before sprouting bullshit..

[@dr_dr]

There is no point arguing with idiots (and this guy with the dodgy beard really was an ocean going idiot), you can never win. This lot really didn't have the first clue. A private landowner cannot restrict lawful and legal activity on a public right of way (which the pavement and crossing most certainly are).

[@johnclements6614]

It depends what you are doing. If you decided to spray paint the place they may be able to arrest you until the police arrive. But just standing there with a camera in a place that has 24 hour public, freely given access, certainly not.

[@aodhan2023]

What is it with the hands and arms tucked into the Hi- Vis jacket?

[@timbull6283]

It's to help him feel a right tit.@@aodhan2023

[@davidanderson4489]

Why is it a dodgy beard?

[@dr_dr]

@@davidanderson4489 because it looks like a bit of carpet nailed to his chin!

[@CHRIS_HITCHCOCK]

As someone from the West Country myself, I always laugh when I hear the accent spoken by authoritarian people. It’s so non threatening. A bit like being savaged by a dead sheep.

[@opiumdennis7249]

ditto.

[@pinballrobbie]

I love the accent but it seems out of place here.

[@alexritchie4586]

I always loved the fact that Benjamin Franklin retained a broad Bristol accent his entire life. Imagine being read the Declaration of Independence in that voice 😂

[@jasonwhale6511]

Savaged by a Dead Sheep 😆 Love it

[@markm3436]

He shoulda just said get off my land!!😂

[@PJ-wm9nq]

So what happens when he has a vehicle waiting at the bollards and then notices they have a dash cam? Same images being taken!! The logic is ridiculous. There's smackheads bothering everyone in the shopping centre and Broadmead, and a camera bothers them. Best bit of this is those lovely Bristolian accents!

[@rongt859]

Funny how a land lord can not force fully remove a squatter without a court order

[@petertaylor9384]

I believe you can from residential property but commercial is a nightmare to remove them

[@ritadonnelly8820]

now you frigging said for sure frigging bloody joke

[@MetalFan10101]

Squatters rights are completely different.

[@Miller4866]

​@@MetalFan10101Rubbish!!!

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

There’s two ways to remove people from open land; Use reasonable force under Common Law or Get a civil injunction. It’s a criminal offence to ignore a civil injunction.

[@747strangersinthenight]

He had to be an Ex army pillock out of the cookhouse

[@philldownes8685]

more like out the shithouse, and 100% gay..

[@KwekuLynx]

Always record your location and boundaries and know the law. Do not answer why you are filming into a private property. Less talking the better.

[@bwghall1]

He thinks he is Police. see my arm`s😂😂😂 and hand are tucked in to my arm holes in my yellow High Viz. Look Mummy I am a Police man.

[@terrybellfeild4366]

Another high viz Knob 😂😂well done audit❤

[@alexdaman.]

That guy is a failure, he wanted to be a copper so bad. He obviously couldn’t make the cut so he struts around wearing combat boots & pants acting as though he’s some official authority.

[@PickleThePig]

Hands tucked into his hi viz like a proper w a n k e r

[@Riki.B]

How right you are 👍

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

On land owned by his employer or client he HAS the authority as agent. He CAN use reasonable force to remove you.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

@@Riki.Bhow WRONG he is.

[@philldownes8685]

@@MrAndrewFarrow no he cant, he has been subbed in. he is not acting for the company who own s the land... big differences in the laws on security.. what they get told at sia muppet school is 99% rubbish.

[@markpaul1154]

Private land is irrelevant if it is the public highway.

[@marttull5979]

That security had Yorkshire puddings for brains

[@blobrana8515]

It is not against the law to photograph or film anything or anyone from a place with public access. Tresspass is a civil matter so unless there is a breach of the peace or some other criminal offence being committed they have no powers to remove you other though the courts. Threats by the security guard to forcefully take a camera is grounds for dismissal. A security guard has no right to stop a member of the public going about their lawful business.

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

No he is on private property , the public only has access on the pavement on the other side of the bollars , if the jobless sovtard goes and stands on the pavement then the security can do nothing , where he is is private and can be removed , just the same as if you walked onto my garden and pointed your camera at the front door or window of my house , I'd come out and physically remove you and I have the right to use the minimum force necessary , if you resist I can use MORE force in order to ahieve removal, and yu can cry as much as you want the courts are in favour of the owner , end of ...

[@blobrana8515]

@@GeorgeCeline2323 in law anywhere that is not signed or restricted by barriers or gates can be considered as accessible by the public. A reception desk in a private building is concidered as accessible by the public. Photography is allowed in a public place or in a place with implied public access. There were no signs or barriers that forbade access to that area; therefore the public can access that area. A court order is required to restrict access to an individual. Ie you are not aware of all the facts. The auditor was allowed by law to be where he was.

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

@@blobrana8515 He was allowed passage on the property , not to stay on the property and take video. No there does not have to be a sign or closed gate , There is a common law right to refuse entry to whom he/her chooses, provided the refusal is not on grounds of sex, race, disability, gender, sexual orientation and religion or belief. Being refused actual entry to premises is a simple extension of the right of refusal to serve. thats totally legal look it up instead of trying to defend YOUR belief

[@blobrana8515]

@@GeorgeCeline2323 you are wrong. There was implied public access. The security guard or owner is powerless to stop him from taking photographs other than through a court order. It has nothing to do with my beliefs. That is the law. You are perhaps confusing the right of a shop to refuse service to anyone; this is about trespass. Tresspass is a civil matter and requires a court order to remove someone from a property. It could also be argued that the public crossing implies that anyone has access to this area and that a court would perhaps rule in favour of the tresspasser.

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

@@blobrana8515 the right of a shop owner to refuse service also gives the shop owner the right to refus entry . the pedestrian crossing is the right of passage , it's still the property of the building they just let people pass through ,,, leaving th pedestrian passage and walking up closer to the building as he did is tres pass, the owner or his representatives can trespass someone and then call the police to arrest them if he refuses to leave. why do you think he left that area and walked back to the pedestrian crossing , because he knew if he stayed he'd be arrested and he is a coward..

[@bcsurvivor4713]

"Why are you filming?" "Because I can and it's my right".

[@Ubique2927]

Obviously public property with the Zebra crossings and other signs on it.

[@scotttchviski6706]

Landowners can paint whatever they want on their roads and lands. Zebra Crossings do not indicate public land.

[@johnclements6614]

They probably own out to the kerb. That way they can build over the footpath in the future if they wish without having to buy the land. But it is a public right of way that can not be withdrawn except in an emergency or by legal means.

[@JunctionWatcher]

2:37 He’s got a cctv license 😂

[@maximan4363]

I thought I misheard that & had to go back!!! A CCTV License!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@krankinkogs]

the bbc sold it to him

[@solarvanlife8177]

I've got one now too....just printed one off in the internet. Gonna tuck my pants in my boots and go kick some ass.....

[@philldownes8685]

they have to have one if in their little room monitoring cctv that might or will film the public.... that realy is a thing although its impossible to fail the test for it..

[@iancraig6070]

Qualified stupidity and security just go together worldwide.

[@ploppyploppy6554]

How dare you say this about security . They self identify as wankers so be polite 🤔

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

…apart from the fact that he was totally and absolutely correct. As an agent of the owner he’s perfectly entitled to use reasonable force where necessary to remove you.

[@reneemarielong6798]

Holy smokes! Brian Dennehy reincarnated as Circus security!

[@catabaticanabatic3800]

Hahaha. Fresh from his role as John Wayne Gacey.

[@binzauk]

I would bet that their land was inside of the yellow bollards and not where you were standing. They would have only got planning permission to erect the bollards within the footprint of their land.

[@JunctionWatcher]

100%

[@robertalford2257]

Bald head and a beard always make me think the head is upside down. This confirms it.

[@corneliuscornia3189]

😂😂

[@OrsJohn]

hahahaha

[@andyscouse4090]

Have just subbed and you are doing the right thing in Exposing the tyranny of jumped up numpties. There is more CCTV cameras in this Country than even China, i don't want too live in North Korea so keep up the good work you are doing.🇬🇧

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

You do know that 99.99% of CCTV is never watched by anyone , literally all of them record on a hard drive and are only consulted if there has been a crime to see if there is proof . and after a certain time the images, video is deleted and recorded over. But some stranger who refuses to identify himself (usually hiding his face with mask, glasses, hat or hoodie) pointing his camera purposefully at someone elses property is highly suspicious , he could be preparing a crime , he could be stalking his next victim , he could be employed by someone to gather information about someone or about the company. NEVER has ANY citizen had a problem filming in public NEVER has the security come out and stopped a tourist from filming as he walks down the street,,,,,, but suddenly a certain number of lazy jobless brits have decided to copy the american sovtards trying to get revenge on the society that took their driving licience by annoying ordinare hardworking people 'cos they're jealous 'cos they can still drive ....

[@boxerdog635]

@@GeorgeCeline2323 I think that u are a troll a cop or maybe security or just an idiot in your mum's back bedroom

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

Unfortunately he got it all wrong. He needs to watch the better auditors like DJ or PJ. Once told to leave private land, they leave.

[@rm009z0858]

The second he said. "This is classed as private land I knew he was lying'. The 'classed' gave him away.

[@chloeew4627]

Sir Cokablock is so well spoken 😂😂😂

[@PhyllisGlassup2TheBrim]

I was born in Bristol 68 years ago. It was somewhere near St George's park and our house was bought for 'slum' clearance where the council knocked down a couple of streets, then did nothing with the land and years later made it a park (Gaunts ham). How lucky was I that my late Father rejoined the army and we were posted to Germany and I grew up in the countryside there, and all our other postings. I went back once and was horrified at how loud and busy and *dirty* the place was. I now have settled in the flat, clean and peaceful Fens.

[@ade3628]

St George is horrible, been that way since I can remember and im 50

[@ukw2001]

There's no privacy in public

[@theukbosun]

Pmsl a zebra crossing isn't a right of way... Comedy gold right there....🤣

[@lakesideaudio]

They are being ridiculous, there is a zebra crossing right there, you could just walk backwards and forwards filming all day long, i think they are just so bored, imagine they must have nothing to do all day and this is the most exciting thing they have ever dealt with. Funny Vid thanks

[@johnchamber5962]

That public right of way was written into their building plans as that was a public right of way before Cabot was built alo ng that rd

[@johnchamber5962]

Also those traffic lights were put there to replace the crossover ramp that was taken down, to make way for their entrance

[@haydoncooper3744]

Ah poor bloke you have stopped him from going to a Hoe down! & he will miss the pie eating contest.

[@sicilia71]

security guards in cabot circus have always been a bunch of clowns. I've got a feeling i'll be taking my camera to Cabot Circus this weekend lol

[@GothicKittyMadness]

they would kick the shit outa you

[@silver47official]

Why does every single person with a stupid hi-vis vest have to rest their hands in it?! So annoying.

[@bwghall1]

he thinks he is Police after watching them.

[@russellhardy2211]

Special things those vests I bet no one in comments knows how many thousands of pounds in drug dealers bundles of cash can dissappear into them bags of coke and other shiny things and...... They keep your hands warm too😂

[@LittleGiant69]

It is annoying… and then they do the little (I’m thick as wood and know less than nothing about everything)..security guard dance..

[@andrewstratford4753]

Old uncle albert thinks he is the law

[@tormid100]

Brilliantly funny.

[@nomore6939]

I've seen it all now .. The security guard has his trousers balloned at the bottom like he's come sort of commando 😂😂😂🤣

[@captmisha]

that "wannabe-a-copper" bloke has been watching too much "It aint half hot" LOL

[@NicolaMcElwee]

Is there a special training class to learn all that bullshit they spout? Dont take photos off our black hole lmao

[@philldownes8685]

yes you can go for this special training once you have been nominated by 3 people for being the village idiot.. the less you realy know the higher your score.. if you know a tiny bit your a police officer, if your level of knowledge is zero you become a traffic warden, if your sub human in the head and think you know it already you become security manager, when everything you know is total bullshit your a fully badged up sia security idiot...

[@bashkillszombies]

Companies are so pleased to become petty over a few feet of what they think is their property. If it's publicly accessible, it's publicly accessible property. You can film anywhere and anything you like there.

[@alfredisted305]

How thick are these guys. Nothing they can do, yet they think they are intelligent. The mind boggles!

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

…yet he was absolutely spot on under Common Law.

[@allanradford1670]

Surely they dont own that there is no sidewalk beyond the wall the pavement leads from the tree right through should report motor bike

[@Ange.887]

Well done brother,you handled those badged clowns perfectly... Love n light x 💚💛

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

He was totally and utterly wrong. He was on private land and his implied right of access was withdrawn.

[@daytona1212]

A lot of fuss over nothing. Security guards alway provide great entertainment.

[@philiphoyle5451]

Yes he was threatened with physical removal by beardy!

[@philldownes8685]

correct. .and that actually is a criminal offence...

[@probablecausetocheckhard-drive]

Wotta walloper with his trousers in his boots , in the space cadets the mong

[@paulwilson-tighe4016]

"See you tomorrow though, yeah?"😂😂 Like your style mate👍👍

[@jaunosvaldo9481]

They don’t have a clue what to do when someone asserts their rights 😂😂

[@paulmartin9194]

If a different employee tells you that its ok does that negate his authority to remove you? Why does he believe he has the final authority?

[@torashwells4378]

Its such a shame people with a very low intellect are employed as security guards who's sole purpose is to observe and report.

[@TheDaflad]

Dick & Liddy are hilarious 😂😂

[@matthewhoyle31]

Section 33 of the criminal justice act 1972. All land including public land that's been delagated public access allows the same rights that the public have on any public street.

[@darrylkennedy2125]

Security is the gift that keeps on giving.

[@haydoncooper3744]

I believe he is technically correct when he says he is an agent of so he can perform certain duties as laid out by the people who pay his wages BUT he is wrong because he himself cannot do what he is threatening to do in regard to doing you for trespassing.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

He is absolutely correct. As agent of the landowner he’s perfectly allowed to use reasonable force to remove him. That’s been the law since time immemorial.

[@budgetnuclearweapons7858]

Yes security WAS correct.

[@alisonb4898]

The only reason they are allowed that land is because they HAVE TO give access to the public, it’s in their agreement with the council. They are not doing favours by letting the public on it, they can’t stop the public going on it.

[@vinegum8835]

Funny part are how proud and confident they are of themselves when explaining nonsense.... And then threatens with physical force when realizing they'r wrong...

[@KwekuLynx]

On final thought they move you on they have achieved their goal. NOT THE WAY TO EXERCISE YOUR RIGHT TO RECORD IN PUBLIC. Think about if the next photography comes along to record at the same location, you have set a precedent they will then confront and try to move that person along.

[@colinmackie7425]

Google earth shows the same access points. What a brain fart.!!

[@Apricot101]

Just subbed to your channel. This is the first video of yours that's popped up when I've been on KZbin & I really enjoyed it 👍

[@retroclickmedia4422]

As soon as you see plod or security with their trousers tucked into their boots you know that you are dealing with a bellend

[@trevormillar1576]

All they need do is put up a sign saying "This is private land and is not dedicated as a public right of way under the Road Traffic Acts"

[@WhatYaL00kingAt]

That security guard needs to learn the law especially when it comes to rights of way. If he had tried to obstruct your use on any public right of way he would be committing a criminal offense for causing an obstruction. Use of public rights of way is protected under the law. The security has zero authority and no protection in law to obstruct anyone.

[@DirectDemocrat]

I love watching these things because it is usually two people spouting the law at each other, neither of whom are lawyers, with little idea of how to actually apply it....or just talking bollocks, quite often. In this case the first security bloke was remarkably knowledgeable in what he was saying and he was kind of right that he does have the right to; (a) As the servant or agent of the land owner, ask you to leave their private property. and, (b) Use a reasonable level of force to remove you from his property if you don't leave, and your legal action wouldn't get very far if he did. What I question is their claim that the crossing and the footpath each side is private property. I would bet my bollocks that it is either public land, (and I notice that the footprint of the building didn't overhang it), or, under the planning consent granted when the building was built it has effectively been made so and they will have consented to it as part of the planning application. It is unquestionably a public right of way and as such I would suggest that you have all the same rights as you would have were it public land and that includes filming and photography. As to filming into their underground car park.....when do I laugh? Even if you were technically, at that point, on their private land, there is the principle of "De minimis non curat lex" or to put it in layman's terms.....the law shall not concern itself with trifles.

[@jamesbaxendale1470]

We admire an auditor that understands the law, our rights and most importantly, who doesn't accept being intimidated or bullied by intellectually challenged security staff. Keep on producing the excellent content.

[@macuppal5175]

The silence after the Buckingham Palace analogy was comical 😂

[@WoollyWanderers]

That fella from ZZ Top has really let himself go!

[@beds139]

So the restricted area has a massive open space in front of it!!! These security goons just get more and more hilarious.😅

[@GeorgeCeline2323]

the ""massive open space"" is the courtyard/plaza of the company ,,, thats private property ;

[@Dreadpirateflappy]

many restricted areas have open spaces in front of them... that doesn't mean anything.

[@beds139]

@@Dreadpirateflappy Err it means they are open spaces😀

[@AnthonySpringall]

Companies should clearly mark where the boundry of private property is. I wonder that where the tripod was standing is private land given the paving stones and the auditor was standing on the road side of the bollards.

[@AnthonySpringall]

OOps Instead of 'private land given' I meant I wonder that where the tripod was standing is public land given

[@robg521]

Security guards should be trained to never go out into public right of way locations to interact with members of the public, they are employed and empowered to patrol the private areas where the public are ‘*NOT*’ allowed to go. Because if they venture outside the only thing they are going to do is to put the company that they work for at risk. If you want to control the area in-front of your property put up fences and signs to clarify the demarcation of boundaries. [Put up a Boundary line and stay behind it.]

[@steviewonderzaful]

I heard that there's new drone laws coming, police stations will be off limits ?

[@topcat1358]

PCA - I need to mention again....Neither a landowner, nor anyone else, can trespass anyone!.....Only a trespasser can trespass! This is use of English language in UK. I believe that because of the influence of some illiterate yank auditors, who believe landowners "trespass" trespassers, some UK auditors also believe this. Landowners, or their agents or representatives, merely ask or tell trespassers to leave private property (or forcibly eject them if necessary). They do NOT, and CANNOT, "trespass" them.

[@robertovers1863]

lol how can you trespass someone from a PRW ? " im security i know all the rules "

[@mrlogiclogic4119]

"I got a cctv licence" bet you have, keep away kids 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@peterdurnien9084]

Exchanged brain for blue licence, does not know anything about open access or photography laws.

[@paulbromley6687]

I imagine the ancestors of these guys would be turnpike cash collectors

[@MrGevander]

They're going to restrict your access **because you have a camera** while they IGNORE everyone walking through WITHOUT a camera. So the only issue they have is being able to RECORD what you can SEE. Would they have made the same arguments if you had been standing there WATCHING (sandwich in hand, maybe) but not RECORDING?

[@johnbell8553]

Totally clueless security again

[@timgeorge1009]

It seems that the majority of muppets think that “private property” means the property itself is private when it actually means that is owned by someone or some company WTAF Great content again man

[@ddoherty5956]

Hands in vest like a 🌈copper 🤣🤣🤣

[@drahcirnevarc9152]

0:30 Riverside Park next to the M32: smackhead central. 2:00 Approaching the Lower Ashley St exit off the M32. A 5 minute walk from my front door.

[@frankbrasenell3789]

The chuckle brothers are still alive then!!!

[@captain-v9i]

I`ve a feeling that they`re not the boss at home, so they dream and act it out at work...😂😂😂😂

[@Mikeandlucy1]

Look at the lay out of that street, according to these two, Pedestrians are supposed to cross the road in order to progress along that footpath because to continue walking on that side of the road, they would have to enter private property. No way was planning permission granted for that building if it took away a public footpath and handed the land over to a private concern. Utter BS and nothing more than this company trying to assert control over land they do not own.

[@davidsmith5523]

He did like talking bollards.

[@patrickyorke3028]

Test your rights, wish I had your balls! Bravo as we say in Italy.

[@TheBILLANDERSON]

and person has right to defend themselves ,, There is no rule in law ,that a person must wait to be struck first before they may defend themselves, (see R v Deana, ) Security has been informed/taught of to s.3 CLA 1967 only in defence or aid to arrest, in a crime , but Security must have :- self defence; defence of another; prevention of crime; and lawful arrest and apprehension of offenders. none criminal to see here 🤷‍♂ but a verbal threat is an assault (not battery) 4:39 is criminal offence to "cause fear intentionally" is a :- s4a PO offence = Intentional @4:39 (a) uses threatening @4:39 (b) displays any visible representation which is threatening @4:39 as 2 element are required for PO ,and BOTH elements have been met 😁 @8:50 have you been threatened with any "physical force" answer @4:39 PS = subscribed 👌

[@haydoncooper3744]

He knows everythink….really!

[@kevbullock8313]

Wow,,more tin can would be if I could be cops🤣🤣

[@closewatcher8586]

The ignorance is strong with that one. Too bad you can't carry pepper-spray over there. Sometimes stupidity needs to be sprayed away. So funny how he claims to know "all the rules" from his 1 hour training class that came with his rent-a-cop costume. The 2 stooges just make it up as they go. Really "observe and report" officers need some sort of training.