I fly quad and I am happy with x7 with upgraded gimbals. Too expensive with no extra function and features that I need. It would be nice when manufacturer include a video receiver built-in.
@dronereviewman95806 жыл бұрын
I love both!!!! I Got a QX7 just couldn't beat it for 80 bucks on sale!!
@dronetrooperfpv78106 жыл бұрын
I just saw one for like $65 open box. I should have jumped on it
@MxJavice6 жыл бұрын
As someone with smaller hands, considering how much power small quads get, can't they do the same with transmitters...Standard shape is fine for pinch flyers I guess, I'm a thumber though and I'm stretching on a taranis. Turnigy evolution did a good job with transmitter design and it is quite natural for anyone who plays video games as its a lot like an xbox pad...it is missing a lot of features though, pretty basic transmitter. I'm also a bit disapointed frsky are still using a wheel and buttons in 2018...turnigy evo has touch screen and its under £60.
@flytown98536 жыл бұрын
Very well done with your summation about the differences in transmitters and where technology should be, but you make it sound as if the transmitters of today are relics, in this hobby new technology comes with higher prices, so at present since the devices in use are still functional and doing what's necessary they're still good to go. You've been flying a great deal longer than I have, so I respect your expertise in your reviews of the evolution in RC flying.
@daveday55076 жыл бұрын
In 1996, why didn't you buy a PCM10? It was only £1000. Maybe we should find out who has been flying R/C the longest. My score is a mere 65 years (1953). Transmitters then used a 120 volt HT battery which was bigger and heavier than a Taranis.
@crimsonfancy6 жыл бұрын
Always the most entertaining knowledge every time. Thank you again AndyRC.
@pspicer7776 жыл бұрын
Good video. Interesting logic concerning the battery ...
@ammej7685 жыл бұрын
So my first model was a Veron Robot. A one valve Hill receiver + McGreggor kit transmitter. So get some time in kiddo!!! LOL. I just bought a Horus X10 for my 'me to me ' Christmas present. I've already got an x9. Reason for the upgrade was to fly my 40% scale Fournier RF 4 Motor glider. It is fitted with 2 x X6R receivers, 16 channel redundancy bus, full Gas Suite, air speed, altimeter. Features 70cc NGH petrol, custom made retract, air brakes. Wing tip smoke canisters. Developed with the help of Mick Reeves ( scaled up laser cut parts). The Horus operating system utilises a Bluetooth function with ' Freelink' app for improved telemetry visualisation to a mobile device ( eg IPod touch) , handled by a copilot! I am about to switch the Horus over to Open TX ( following your very clear explanation on this channel) Do you hnow if this feature will be lost?? I am guessing that it will!
@pippifpv6 жыл бұрын
Wayyyy tooo expensive for me. This is a hobby. Me and my family can eat for a month for that much money.
@panthai2726 жыл бұрын
This is exaktli what i think..!
@bobuk57226 жыл бұрын
Hi. Unfortunately here you can't feed a family for a month on that sort of money. Living costs are much higher. Well done for being able to run the hobby in your economy. Something of a challenge I would guess.
@imemyself28206 жыл бұрын
Very good and interesting approach, master AndyRC. His Highness is supposedly a radio engineer, someone should contact him and give him a mission: Construct a top notch DIY transmitter. I looked inside, it's a printboard and lots of empty space, should be possible :)
@Maplesyrup4165 жыл бұрын
thats really nice man no clicking when you press the buttons so smooth...looks like its good quality
@SMITHII_6 жыл бұрын
27 years? Holy shit. I thought you were way younger than that. Good for you lol
@francisroan6 жыл бұрын
27 years?! I thought you were like a 20yr old kid😂
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
most people do which is why i struggle to convince people sometimes :)
@pippifpv6 жыл бұрын
AndyRC so, how old are you, if you dont mind me asking. I experience the oposit. Ppl thinking im 40 when, i'm not Even 30 yet
@DroneyMontana6 жыл бұрын
Hrr Pippi I'm the same but older. I'm in my 40s but people think I'm in my 50s. Damn grey hair! 😠
@dronetrooperfpv78106 жыл бұрын
I went on a diet and started balding in my 20’s People thought I was dying😂
@TheTurbo9306 жыл бұрын
hahahahahaha lol how cruel hahaha you okay man HIV?? Seen a doctor ahahahahaha....too funny....👍🤘👌✔
@Rich-TeaFPV6 жыл бұрын
Really interesting ideas Andy you make some good points thanks👍
@evanthevan6 жыл бұрын
Gotta disagree this time! Change for the sake of change.. not my thing. Build quality looks nice, but the form factor itself isn't anything to write home about - just another massive box. If the thing did in fact run Android (like the ix12) then maybe I'd see the value. If it were smaller than other transmitters, or otherwise more ergonomic then yes I'd see the value. As is though, I'd just as gladly use an X7 or X9d.
@atomicskull64055 жыл бұрын
The Taranis shell is very similar in appearance to the JR XP9303 shell but it's not an exact clone. It's actually the same mould that was used for the the Kingmax T810 FM radio shell. Plastic moulds are hideously expensive and using a pre existing mould allowed FrSky to knock a good chunk of change off the development cost.
@gitech74506 жыл бұрын
I'd have to say I think the FlySky FS-i10 made some notable advances to separate it from FrSky and all the others (of the past). It's thin and light, very thin and light. It's got a full color touch screen display. It's got an included and swappable lipo that can be charged via micro USB, and without needing to remove it from the TX. It's 3 pots can be recessed to get them out of the way, protect them, and maintain their position. It's only $99 for the TGY-i10 version (better IMO as well). It, or FlySky in general, has the lowest latency than all the others by far... EVEN Crossfire! It uses i-Bus, which is known to be more stable than S-Bus. I will NEVER understand why anyone would choose the bulky, heavy, non-ergonomic, quality-of-life-feature deprived, overpriced, high latency (slow), old/dumb/brick of a TX, unless they absolutely needed a function that is not available on the faster/lighter/smarter/cheaper TGY-i10 (and that is a tall order for a quad to NEED the extra functions like crazy mixing). IMO OFC. ;) Cheers :)
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
i agree and i think because the pros all go frsky a lot of the bnfs you can get are favoring frsky and that is why im having to invest in their products
@ariafpv6 жыл бұрын
AndyRC I think its just name like iphones!!!!!! FlySky are super nice and as good as frsky but some years ago 1 pilot became a pro with frsky so everybody thinks fs is shit because its cheaper!!!
@HomeGrownCanadianFPV6 жыл бұрын
I Love my X10s..... top notch... not for everyone, but for me, perfect...
@gitech74506 жыл бұрын
Tnx for the replies so far. Cheers mates. :)
@Allamut29096 жыл бұрын
i am waiting more eagerly revolution or some meaningful breakthrough in battery tech. Radio was important in a days of LOS flights with FPV and OSD i hardly watch at it while flying.
@aerofokus6 жыл бұрын
Frisky should make a mini type of transmitter like a Mavic or spark have
@rl21096 жыл бұрын
You are absolutely right...! Transmitters are not keeping up with the advances in the RCVR side components... Imagine the capabilities if they had been keeping up...!
@MadMarcWinnipeg6 жыл бұрын
hell ya ! i would love to see transmitters progress. Good Job Andy
@jeffvenable38456 жыл бұрын
Wow. What a great idea
@michaelcocheci36966 жыл бұрын
another top notch review from andy rc ! cheers !
@miniquadsmegafun36196 жыл бұрын
You are totally right man I just found my dads old tx from his rc jet days and it’s over 30 years old and looks very modern for its age.. last years motors might as well a decade old in past tech... and I like my Nokia brick!!!! Snake ftw!
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
yep i agree cheers
@TankBuilders3 жыл бұрын
Great to see someone using Mode 1. Thought I was the only one left on the planet. You must be really old.....
@MPQuads2376 жыл бұрын
Nice touch with the transmitters. I mostly strugle with the size of them. I guess that DJI is getting close to take over with Occusync. I just saw a quad with Occusync video transmission system. The guy reported that video latency is fine. But if Occusync is able to transmit also controll singnal then it will be huge winner in terms of transportability.
@patrickcol6 жыл бұрын
Totally agree about the stagnation of any ergonomic design, my old Spektum DX7 sits next to my X9D and they look almost identical. Which is why I bought into the Turnigy Evolution, (a nicely designed little Txwith an amazing range and cost me £30 with an Rx). But there is so much more that can be done. Redesign the case so it forms to your hand, design it so your thumbs pivot naturally, (we had rotating gimbals in the (80s!), single-stick designs, (perfect for Bruce, I can't understand why he hasn't made one). Wish I was a product design student, there's a wide-open market.
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
great ideas cheers
@havoc0101015 жыл бұрын
Andy, great video. I agree that transmitter technology has remained stagnate over the years. The X10S is a step in the right direction. I would like to see Betalight run from a high end transmitter. Keep the content coming!
@LarryJenkins6 жыл бұрын
Andy, I totally agree with adding some kind of base operating system! Yuneec's transmitter is based off of Android, which was a great start in my opinion since Android is open source. Like you said if someone would start the movement and community would get behind it you could have beta flight in the field and make all adjustments in the field instead of using a laptop and what not. Anyways maybe we are not too far from that. :) Great Video
@Skankhunt-42-6 жыл бұрын
Put a screen protector on it. Like you said. "Just like a phone". X12S protector fits and available cheap.
@robmcdonald56796 жыл бұрын
The Turnigy Evolution is a good move forwards - as is the new iRangeX multi protocol
@dogstar76 жыл бұрын
Great video. Good point. Why not Android progressing and smart-phone touch control displays, memory, video recording, etc???
@icerook15606 жыл бұрын
Better With A Drone look at the spektrum one, all what you need
@coryvenezia55306 жыл бұрын
spektrum ix 12 has android
@icerook15606 жыл бұрын
Cory Venezia yes
@LongusFPV6 жыл бұрын
I think there is one from flysky with android on it
@Johnn_T5 жыл бұрын
Better With A Drone my buddy has an IX12 and he hates it (and he's die hard Spektrum too). The Android aspect really slows down the radio he tells me, he's even turned off all wireless connectivity on it in an effort to try to get it to work faster. He tells me all his mates in the US with them have Facebook and internet banking apps on them etc and why the heck would you wanna do all that when you're out flying (and I have to agree). I'm not a huge fan of touchscreens myself, yes sure it's nice to have but how many times have you messed up spelling on your smartphone (for example). Andy is right to a degree when he says things have stagnated-all tx's look dated as a rule, the Taranis looks REALLY dated and I've even upgraded the heck out of mine-so yea, maybe it's time to embrace a little change-openTX is getting upgraded all the time so why not upgrade the tx itself to something a bit more modern looking? I have heard though that the screen is a bitch for reflecting sunlight and a matte screen protector is a must.
@du4-fpv7776 жыл бұрын
27 years of flying? Wow. I thought you were only in your 20s congrats! Awesome radio! Definitely want a tarranis
@WendysNuts4u6 жыл бұрын
now that TBS is putting out great receivers and transmitter modules, I'm assuming they will soon release their own transmitter, which I'm sure will be great. guaranteed it happens this year. 👍
@--JohnDoe6 жыл бұрын
Andy you have to get this quad to review. Diatone 2018 GT-M3 Normal Plus 110mm/170mm RC Drone FPV Racing F4 OSD TBS G1 600TVL 20A BLHeli_S PNP
@zeebeefpv22736 жыл бұрын
I agree we must show we want to move on with our dollars/pounds with in order to progress! Would like to believe one day you could load Android on there like the other new radio out there...when betaflight allows direct communication! Good Joss Andy
@ArchmageAU6 жыл бұрын
Good direction, but the X10S is not there yet. Turnigy evolution had a great idea making the TX more game controller form factor (better ergonomics for control). But the evolution stopped evolving. How about combine xbox style controller with wearable wireless voice command module with screen that can feed into your goggles through OSD. Voice command to perform non-time critical functions that cannot be mapped easily to control switches (change rates, flaps for fixed wing, etc..) As we progress in the world of VR interfaces and augmented reality, I think there is a lot yet to come in the area of RC control.
@andrewjamez6 жыл бұрын
keep an eye out for the upcoming FrSky X-Lite form factor transmitter
@polarbearjf6 жыл бұрын
+Andy RC I think all the changes you mentioned would be amazing but the way prices are in this hobby a radio with all that functionality would be unaffordable for most of us in the hobby :(
@andrewjamez6 жыл бұрын
The horus or frsky OS is already just a custom lite version of openTX. FrSky OS does everything 99% of people need just like any other branded radio. Where it comes in to its own is all the lua scripts it can utilise to program other components or display outside telemetry like mavlink...That is what sets openTX apart
@TheMadmacs6 жыл бұрын
i was just thinking along these lines the other night, i'm trying to talk myself into getting a qx7, for two main reasons, a short throw hall effect gimbal on the throttle and the range of receivers frsky offer, not to mention crossfire, but its hard to give up the old flysky i6 and its value and performance, and simple things like one wire from vbat to receiver for voltage telemetry which i think is a vital aspect of quad flying, it tells you about battery health via sag and the simplicity of getting it to work puts frsky to shame. so yeah, radios do need a big jolt to get them to move forward a bit, the legacy options make using a frsky pretty hard, surely its way past the time when we have to decypher the legacy functions and a quad specific set of functions be in their place. the hobby is still very very niche even with last years boost in numbers, the main thing holding it back are the mystifying terms and protocols and software updates, and the expense. i think even the horus looks like battlestar galactica technology, i want something with a bit more futuristic styling, and the weight????
@ZylonFPV6 жыл бұрын
I think you make a good point here. I would like to have android running on it and have something resembling betaflight configuration going. Lua scrips are cool but so much more could be possible.
@FlyingFun.6 жыл бұрын
Nice review as usual Andy, Frsky make nice stuff and this does look nice BUT.... It's just too big and heavy these days when I'm flying micro quads and have nice small goggles , then I have to carry around a huge tx ...
@MADDOG7246 жыл бұрын
Agree 100% Andy!!!
@OlegBovykin6 жыл бұрын
We dont need bigger transmitters!! We need small and portable one with small screen and ability to configure it via cell phone. Look at the mavic RC transmitter - that size will be good.
@davidfarmer17366 жыл бұрын
The industry is moving so fast that it's difficult to pay top dollar just to find out that something better, more suited to your needs, was released while you are waiting for yours to arrive in the male. I bit the bullet on the taranis X9D plus and the SE version comes out. Now FrSky has a new one, the FrSky X-LITE. This is ridiculous!
@twigfpv36676 жыл бұрын
Having Betaflight on my transmitter would be amazing! Great idea! Till then, its Taranis all the way!
@2strokeme646 жыл бұрын
And I thought I was an old fart... I still have some old fm stuff. Remember swapping crystals?
@28daballa6 жыл бұрын
I love this radio I have the X7S
@Arad4206 жыл бұрын
Dude.. You just blew my mind with adding android and having betaflight right on the transmitter. You may have just changed the industry for the better. Keep it up. Always enjoined your reviews..
@m1stagate1056 жыл бұрын
i agree that right there is innovation! i only really just got the qx7 and thought it was future proof but fc software on the transmitter omg .how about a link to your'e goggles built in dvr that overlays ur stick inputs into your vids for you!
@m1stagate1056 жыл бұрын
would also like to augmented reality on goggles that overlays a track and gates into youre video feed in a predetermined area. sod all this setting up and packing down and expensive gates just a bit of software that works with the fc and googles somehow
@PaulTichonczuk6 жыл бұрын
Spektrum makes a surface radio with Android www.spektrumrc.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=SPM6410 . Air version coming this year I believe.
@haveric246 жыл бұрын
spektrum have just done the android thing look up IX12
@PaulTichonczuk6 жыл бұрын
Ahh, I missed the release of this. Cool.
@kevalinopicks55556 жыл бұрын
Wow - £331! Not sure where they get their prices from. All for moving on, Andy but I’m sure you mentioned Windows. Imagine in the middle of a long flight getting the message “Ctrl/Alt/Del to reboot.....”
@RiverBloodfishing6 жыл бұрын
Yea, Taranis should have android or windows its a favorite brand and should keep up with the new spectrum model
@Scaze746 жыл бұрын
My Q X7 does it for me but at the fraction of the price :)
@turboomni8486 жыл бұрын
Nice review. A time for a change maybe but I wished you showed us the Fros system it came with and why you wanted to go back to what you are familiar with which is opentx ,,no change. I have been looking for Fros videos but all seem to want the open tx I guess because they are familiar with it and want,,,, no change. Is the 10S factory operating system so bad or different that no one wants to change and go back to open tx? I do have an old JR 9303 that I still use ,,great radio. I do like your work and have for a long time. Are there ANY videos running through and explaining the pros and cons of Frsky Fros?? I am sure many worked hard on this operating system and I for one would like to see what it is about before going back to no change.
@SweFPV6 жыл бұрын
Sleeeek lookin' them gimballs, mmm :)
@Carlovfx6 жыл бұрын
I think it's a pity we cannot use that screen as FPV video feed, really a lost chance for FRSKY. I'm in this moment thinking of buying tomorrow another X9D Plus SE or a Horus X10s and apart from the price and gimbals I dont see any big change. I really would like to convince myself on buying tomorrow a X10S but that radio is doing nothing more of a X9D. Anyway, happy problems I suppose...
@DutchRC6 жыл бұрын
To be honnest, I think quite a lot of people should just stick with the frOS. 80% of pilots won't mis any option, and it's quite a bit more user friendly. Offcourse for people moving into the X10(s) from an openTX transmitter, it's a different story.. Linux & a higher ress screen! Yeahhhh.. I'd be in :)
@amisoftau26596 жыл бұрын
Now you're talking! :). With Linux we can have real time support, stability, and smarts.. so we can for instance have smart TX's to "auto flight plan" the race using a "smart" quad (smart race quad would need additional sensors - e.g. gps, lidar etc for auto positioning).. then we'd have a race worth watching (double or more crazy speeds! - flown with machine accuracy).
@acehighflyer1236 жыл бұрын
Believe it or not Spektrum has a radio coming out that does basically everything you are talking about. To include native Betaflight support and android functionality. I cant believe it either but I just watched a video on it about a month and a half ago. Maybe you can get a sample when it comes out....
@richardlong36156 жыл бұрын
If you want more 2 position switches then swap them out and amend the programming. Its one of the advantages of the Taranis/Horus etc.
@helalmiah60396 жыл бұрын
The model looks tempting but I won't upgrade until FRSKY bring out one with FPV screen like the Devo f12e or Android screen or capability to connect to my phone.
@chrissieracki29596 жыл бұрын
I like your ideas Andy but price needs to drop to more like the QX7 with any "upgrade" of the future. The Horus is a joke!
@Son_of_a_Gun7626 жыл бұрын
Spektrum iX12 has an Android OS, it's $600 though. I'll stick with my DX9 that I modded with M9 gimbals for now. I hear the FrSky X-lite has 2 internal antennas and an external antenna which has me very curious.
@razhua6 жыл бұрын
the software is much better now as well
@dstaron31626 жыл бұрын
Agree. I still think smaller would be better.
@scottmarshall67666 жыл бұрын
My original Taranis was pretty well worn out just as they released the X12, I was caught up by the flash and bought a Horus that hangs in my shop with a row of 72mhz Tx.($500 wasted) It's display limits functionality and name lengths (The X10 appears to have the same display and issue). I rebuilt my old Taranis, and finally bought an X7S, and that's what I use most lately. The scroll wheel won me over, but I wish it had the extra switches. The Taranis is now mostly for my Giant scale gas stuff. Open TX on all. Wish I could trade my X12 for another Taranis. Or a couple X7S'. Spektrum has the new "Android Transmitter" and personally, I don't see the need. Simpler is more reliable, and flight requires that, manned or not.
@HomeGrownCanadianFPV6 жыл бұрын
I LOVE MY X10s.... the feel, the balance.... the gimbals ;)
@twigfpv36676 жыл бұрын
(In best Homer voice) Gimmmmballllls.... gggaaaaahhhhhhhhh....
@billsomrak6 жыл бұрын
Hey, I thought it was great when they moved away from vacuum tubes in transmitters, like my 1st one had (had to have batteries for the filaments and the plates .. expensive 'dry cells' at that). Yes, I flew on 27mhz when there were only 6 RC channels, and if someone was on your frequency, you had to wait for them to land. Then, they moved everything to 72-75 mhz, and opened up loads of channels, and you'd think you'd never run into the "someone is on my frequency" problem .. but it still happened. So, I'm pretty much "over the moon" with my Taranis 9D+, compared to where I've come from. My 1st car was a 1957 Chevy, and I admit that my 2013 Subaru Legacy is quite a bit more comfortable and has loads more features. However, I could still get from point A to point B efficiently with both. Perhaps when A.I. gets to the point where you can give verbal commands to your transmitter, it will be of some significance. Cheers!
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
thats a good point Bill. I do love the X9D but i think as someone else mentioned. you can take a flight controller or motor from 6 months ago and its old newa, I think in comparison the TX side of things is stalling and perhaps they are even missing a trick. cheers
@Albertow46 жыл бұрын
Nice same always!
@SKIDOOSH6 жыл бұрын
I have been looking at this Radio myself. Please do the Firmware vid and keep us updated on your thoughts!
@kim8216 жыл бұрын
I would think the screen would have fpv option.
@krakenking15976 жыл бұрын
You work with the overseas guys and you could make the "andyrc" transmitter! Id buy one!
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
haha that would be awesome
@GeorgeCooper_LoneWolf6 жыл бұрын
Nice looking RX Andy, great idea about having a screen to see betaflght rather than using smart audio. for my Quads i use the Turnigy Evolution (love it) However when I'm flying my Heli or plane stuff then i use my Futaba.
@rdubs17056 жыл бұрын
I would always think, "Andy is a smart kid." turns out you are as old as me lol
@qumefox6 жыл бұрын
You say styling hasn't changed any. Did you forget the Q X7 exists? It's not 1/4 as gaudy as the x9d is. And having the FC software on the TX wouldn't be workable either. That's just going to add a whole lot of latency to the system for pretty much no gains whatsoever, and in general make the whole thing unstable, especially when you start dealing with low signal strength and dropouts.
@man1254036 жыл бұрын
the only move on is getting rid of all that inversion. it is stupid - all frsky receivers comes with sbus and sport inverters on it, so you need another inverters on flight controller or ftdi board. as for android or windows - i do not think, that anybody be happy to charge transmitter every night and getting BSOD viruses or stalls in flight. instead, it would be better to have an ability to connect transmitter to usb to your phone/tablet/laptop to control model/getting telemetry and scripts. i think that transmitters must be simpler, because they must be reliable. and i do not like color screens in applications, that do not have any advantages of using color screens.
@michaelalexander9176 жыл бұрын
Why is the date on the transmitter April 05 2015?
@rotovicious11566 жыл бұрын
I love my qx7, I upgraded from a dx6e. Spektrum needs to stop following Mac/Apple's business model. The horus is a bit out of my pay grade. Hope it suits you well.
@dronetrooperfpv78106 жыл бұрын
How about betaflight app on a smartphone that bluetooths to the radio or hooks straight into flight controller. Or use the screen like the TBS radio to fly a micro in the house and not need my googles
@plainuser485966 жыл бұрын
I honestly don't think there is much more that radios can do. They do all they need to tbh and all the upgrades I can think of would be evolution rather than revolution.
@wingnut3696 жыл бұрын
Spektrum is releasing a 12ch.android connected radio,catch is its $600 usd
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
yes this is why im hoping frsky will concentrat their future on matching this for a better price
@Paraglider504 жыл бұрын
How do you customize the screen with your Andyrc logo or another background?
@mike945604 жыл бұрын
ROFL I have the exact same Futaba radio and I never really used it. Like new in it's case.
@TheTurbo9306 жыл бұрын
I'm 'm with ya Andy!! Nice radio!! Like it! So have you heard what is the deal with this other new FrSky I see or did see advertised but have not seen it in the storefronts yet? Did it cease to be or did they make this one instead? For it was more like the Turnigy Evo, and I am STILL even though they are probably making a new version of it as well for I did see that the price of them at Hobby King has came down to a little over fifty USD or so...But I think that is just a good value and should just go ahead and get one of this model for MANY liked it a lot, I know it is no Taranis and does not have voice and things reason I wish to try it is for the comfort for I am a thumber lol and though not a gamer at all still think maybe this type would be good? And at the lowered price well worth it, as I like IBUS as well although it will not replace my X9D, and I probably will not want to spend whatever Turnigy replaces it with if it is not a huge advancement, the Evo that is out now is one I just want to give a shot, but the new FrSky was "spose" to me more like that, a game controller type BUT has the voice and even module bay so thought THAT IS MY NEXT TRANSMITTER!! FOR SURE!! But have not seen anymore about it anywhere?? If you have any info PLEASE disclose!! hahahaa I really was hyped and excited for this new FrSky and was hoping it was not going to cost the $999 that many had it advertised at haha and did find it for under a hundred dollars somewhere as the estimated price for I guess no one really knew what the price tag would be/ Please fill me in when you get chance I seriously would like to know if it is not happening or what? For holding off on the Evo for if this new FrSky is that type but with all the X9D features as voice etc...I GOTTA HAVE ONE!!! Thanks! Keep up the awesome good work!!! -Turbo.
@rotovicious11566 жыл бұрын
Hey you have a good point, a windows os built into the radio would be amazing. You could plug your quad into the radio and do everything you normally would do on your laptop!!! Wtf hows that no already a thing!?
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
this is my thinking :)
@ariafpv6 жыл бұрын
Roto Vicious lol u just gave me an idea✌ Im gonna take a raspberry pi with windows and replace my flysky fsi6 screen with an HD screen and split the two screen signals so you can press a button to change from controller settings to windows Would be an awesome kickstarter project😂✌
@ryanmaynard2566 жыл бұрын
what about my car steering wheel been same over 100 years IT works leave it alone
@dannyg28456 жыл бұрын
Turn off your power steering and try to do a three point turn!
@shozzy696 жыл бұрын
Please please please can you show how to put the firmware onto this tx as there is nothing out there are I know I am not the only one out needing help with this. Keep up the good work
@jonithenjackson55216 жыл бұрын
Yes
@daveday55076 жыл бұрын
I forgot. Futaba runs Windows.
@goriverman6 жыл бұрын
What about the Spektrum iX12 12-Channel DSMX Transmitter
@Taematoe6 жыл бұрын
I'd like it but not at the price tag of the new phones. 300-1,000. usd is too much for me to dish out. I use the flysky i6 upgraded to 10 channel and it works fine.
@joshhulsey80476 жыл бұрын
Didn't Horizon just add android to its new TX. The iX12 . If you want the newest tech why not buy the Spektrum?
@quadbrofpv97276 жыл бұрын
Nice review, can you review the frsky r9 system? Looks like a good alternative to the tbs crossfire but I can't find any reviews on it.
@kirkrollins67956 жыл бұрын
you seen the new spectrum x12 with android screen that works with beta flight n keep up the good work bro
@ZylonFPV6 жыл бұрын
Also I had no idea you have been flying for 27 years!
@JeffriRanger6 жыл бұрын
Not really much changes, I think I shouldn't upgrade my transmitter
@RCinginSC6 жыл бұрын
I can see having an Android OS but please, for the love of Pete, NO WINDOWS OS! If so, everytime you use it, you would have to wait for countless updates and it would periodically shut down in the middle of a flight to do an update. Andy, you are a very smart guy, but suggesting a Windows OS would be the worst mistake ever. Good luck with the new Tx. Keep us posted.
@prinztom86526 жыл бұрын
Nice review, I just thought of my first 27mhz 4 channel 35years ago... 😂 But honestly, this is just a design variation of the qx7 and co. There is not really a progress in technology, which would justify this price. I can update my qx7 to hall gimbals for 40 bucks, so why should I pay additional 400 for a colour screen? Four hundred... I have had cars, that have cost less 😂
@glumfish68626 жыл бұрын
Well Spektrum now does look better than the Taranis!
@rudiphoto6 жыл бұрын
Too bad that all FrSKY transmitters (bar the X9D) are not comfortable for pinchers. The square looks might be modern, but they are not ergonomic. :(
@SimRacer1016 жыл бұрын
Ok, convince me. :-)
@SimRacer1016 жыл бұрын
Oh man, no Android or Windows. The radio need to be rock steady and not crash.
@rotovicious11566 жыл бұрын
DroneRacer101 windows would be a nice touch, then you could plug your quad into your radio for tuning. No need to bring a laptop to the field any more. Good point on the crashing, but that could be easily avoided with a dual circuit system. Then if widows crashes it wont effect your flight.
@AndyRCchannel6 жыл бұрын
iv actually had open tx crash on me a few times, but as long as the controls still work...
@cyranoidy6 жыл бұрын
Roto Vicious wit the new luas, you can tune pretty much everything on the field
@imemyself28206 жыл бұрын
Well, there is always the Turnigy YGT-i10. I see lots of innovation in the price! Maybe that's why it is always sold out. And there is the TBS Tango always looking interesting. Lots of options, dont have to fill FrSky's money tank to the brim.