I've Wanted A Battleship Like This For 9 Years! - Tennessee

[@ayayaybamba3445]

If they are going to introduce larger and easier to hit citadels, they need to fix the issues of AP full pens through superstructures first. Right now so many ships with hard to hit citadels also have massive superstructures that get absolutely crushed by AP full pens and HE spam. If you raised the citadels on these ships to be easier to hit, the ships might as well have no armor at all.

[@IvanSkaro86]

The last thing this ship need is bigger citadel (above water). Because its already big slow pinata so it cant be too easy to destroy.

[@bohba13]

i feel that having french saturation on AoN-schemed ships would help with this.

[@saltyvanilla3304]

Superstructures should work like DD armor, with certain calibers being able to pen and others only overpen, taking 15k when angled is just dumb

[@bohba13]

@@saltyvanilla3304 I only think this should apply to certain ships and not other. (all cruisers and lower but not all BBs)

[@GRIGGINS1]

Remember back in WW2 where BBs only angled and never fired full broadsides at enemy ships... No I don't remember any of that happening. The no broadside rule is a World of Warships tactic. Not how actual Naval warfare happened.

[@johnallen4858]

This design - High main battery accuracy - would have been PERFECT for USS Washington, which was the flagship of Admiral Willis "Ching" Lee, an Olympic gold medalist for shooting, and a man OBSESSED with gunnery and accuracy. Why Washington is not in the game with a mechanic like this is beyond all common sense and reason. Washington crew was drilled relentlessly in gunnery and they could (and did) put accurate fire on target in the first salvo.

[@LincolnGeaney]

-“im coming through” Completely agree with this and it would completely fill out the Washington class of ships Massachusetts, Alabama, and Washington.

[@cookiecraze1310]

Guy got stuck in the middle of a street with enemy snipers, so he just sat down in the middle of it and waited till he could see the glint off their scopes and quickscoped them before they could fire. Drachinifels video on him is great for learning all the insane stuff about his life

[@moechammaddjochan5118]

​@@LincolnGeaneywhat the fuck? Washington is a North Carolina-class, not her own. Also Massachusetts and Alabama are part of the _separate_ South Dakota-class

[@vegas6908]

Puerto Rico gets screwed with BB dispersion. Pretty dumb.

[@ReDiR20]

its balanced in that way, very good supercruiser

[@IntelCorei-KProcessor-go2to]

​@@ReDiR20 nah. PR is mid as hell. Would love for her to get the slot 6 -11% disp module.

[@15Med3]

idk....i just dev struck 2 cruisers with PR in a match. Henry and Hindenburg....its kind of feat or famine ship

[@Snagabott]

@@15Med3 PR is not a good ship. I straight up prefer Alaska (which, granted, is very strong, but still...).

[@jeffvreeburg531]

yeah it needs a buff

[@nicholasharshbarger4454]

As a born and bred Tennessean, this is a ship I’ve been wanting in the game for a long time.

[@Apollyon-er4ut]

I know PQ isn't a history buff, but I am and this ships is special. Our family friend, J. McDonald was on the Tenn., Dec.7. He wasn't seriously injured and latter was AA gunnery officer aboard Essex. Obviously, I'm getting this ship. Seems like the Cit is to offset the slow speed, slow turrets, bad gun angles, especially taking what is a T6 ship into T10 game. And compared to Ipa, this is NOT an OP ship.

[@jonathanstewart4800]

Just an FYI. I’m Tennessee born and raised. Several years ago I ran across the December 7th after action report for the Tennessee. I found it online. I’m assuming it’s still available somewhere.

[@donjuandeaustria1213]

16:37 That size comparison with Izumo is hilarious. Little baby Standard BB (I kid, I kid, I love those battlewagons).

[@naibu-tran]

i think it's about the perspective, the Tennessee is not that small compared to the Izumo

[@donjuandeaustria1213]

@@naibu-tran mebbe, hard to know since I can't find any WG dimensions for Izumo. But Iowa's 828 ft long, 108 at the beam; meanwhile Tennessee's 600 (at waterline) and 97. So pretty short and stubby in comparison.

[@bradenhagen7977]

​@@donjuandeaustria1213I think that means it's shorter than Helena. Maybe Brooklyn too

[@Mthammere2010]

​@@bradenhagen7977they are shorter than later designed cruisers.

[@vtr0104]

That Camo on the turrets had me initially thinking that GW had given it some Colorado turrets or something..... VERY glad to see it wasn't the case and they stuck to the 356s

[@stephen1r2]

Was my 1st thought

[@paddington1670]

aye matey

[@rjcolombe]

Funny thing is, bad dispersion can actually HELP players with bad aim.

[@bohba13]

all the more reason to remove overmatch and tighten dispersion.

[@bradenhagen7977]

The amount of times I've been perfectly dodging in my Atago and that one stray shell goes wide and Cits my stern is baffling.

[@Mthammere2010]

​@@bohba13overmatch should be more common and realistic armor/munitions mechanics implemented.

[@bohba13]

@@Mthammere2010 More comon? it absolutely fucks over cruisers.

[@Mthammere2010]

@@bohba13 none American/German cruisers, but you're forgetting, that DDs escape the overmatch issue all together and BBs for the most part don't have to worry about it outside of Special tiers.

[@nozyspy4967]

7:45 Nobody would play the damn thing if that was the case PQ. You would get devstruck from the other side of the map within the first 3 minutes, before you had even had a chance to position at all. The whole purpose of broadside armour, historically, was that ships were SUPPOSED to fight roughly broadside to each other.

[@matsab7930]

This is a video game. The broadside armour should be whatever leads to the most well-balanced and enjoyable gameplay.

[@Will-qk8ig]

@@matsab7930 no.

[@johnallen4858]

Exactly right! Crossing the T was the preferred tactic, sailing in a broadside line so all your guns could fire against ships sailing directly at you, which could only use their front guns.

[@Mthammere2010]

​@@matsab7930bury your videogame nonsense in the Sand; this is a virtual interactive museum with video game elements to keep it alive. We need historical elements to some extent. Armor and munitions are one of them.

[@dphalanx7465]

Unfortunately, PQ is like most KZbinrs---he's good with the gaming environment, but he wouldn't know a historical fact if it hit him in the ass. Let's face it, there's only one Drachinfels (god bless 'im); I don't really expect most of these KZbin camwhores and half-wits to know what Century it is, let alone relevant historical naval info. The real trick is knowing _exactly_ where the balance point is between Historical Simulation vs Game Design Meta...how far can you satisfy both sides without giving away too much?

[@SchusterJames]

"It's a Vincent so I don't feel bad", thanks for the laugh

[@FrostBeam009]

Overmatch makes most "heavy" cruisers unplayable if you ask me... 9/10 ships people bring overmatches 30mm armor.

[@samuelhakansson6680]

Because the main wows audience are sh*tter BB mains who want to point and click their way to glory, hence you get this situation.

[@insovietrussiavodka]

28min sum up -Accurate -Lot of overmatch -Underwater citidal -Doesn't suffer 40s reload like Kansas... which is somehow balanced -Armor is nice -Default Murican sluggishness -AA is light and vulnerable... despite the stats suggest it's default US BB of the tier.

[@samuelhakansson6680]

Underwater citadel shouldnt be a thing on BBs. They get to reliably devstrike cruisers, but are pretty much immune nowadays to f*cking up themselves by these extremely tucked away citadels. BBs should get punished hard just like cruisers.

[@ManuR-l4m]

Really hope they give California some love. That one is just such a left behind child compared to WV44.

[@darthrevan704]

They did buff the reload by asmall amount.

[@Towboatin]

It's tolerable since the buffs. Hardly a showstopper, but it's workable.

[@PitchBlackYeti]

Should have been tier 8 from the start, along with WV44. They are both screwed by being stuck with 26mm plating

[@ManuR-l4m]

@@PitchBlackYeti WV44 is amazing at its tier. Great ship for T7 ranked.

[@SaiIor_Moon]

Honestly, with the release of Tennessee, California has (sadly) officially become the "Tier VII Alabama". Why use her when Wee Vee '44 exists? And if you want a Tennessee-class, you go for Tennessee over her sister. California literally has nothing going for her, even after the (SMALL) buff she got (which I'm still grateful for, at least WG buffed her at all....).

[@ashleighelizabeth5916]

"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." -The Dude.

[@neilbhalodi8797]

i don’t think the HE needs to be nerfed, when this thing gets up tiered (and it will), the AP is going to be nigh useless against ANY ship that has 25 mm plating or more. so it needs something to fall back on, and with only 20.5 kts of speed, the conceal is warranted. considering how busted other designs are in this game (libertad, vincent, bungo, etc), this one is fine as is imo

[@contactpigeon4654]

13:31 yes it does, and even with that it still got its reload buffed. You can get over 1m HE dpm with the right build, its completely broken.

[@modica3466]

Having an exposed citadel would be a nightmare. The lack of citadel is offset by being slow, weak to HE spam, and slow turrets. If you were punished to go broadside on it, Tennessee would suck.

[@gn01873122]

huge citadel make everyone hide behind the island. that means more static games. broadside punishment soooooooooo hard, if you push, you dead. make everybody refuses to push.

[@Cbazzanella1907]

As a WOWS Legends player I can confirm… Colbert, Stalingrad and Worcester have all 32mm Bows and Sterns 💀

[@Momofukudoodoowindu]

Dispersion is everything that's why the German AP DL line is feels so good

[@Littlewing1977]

It needs the below water citadel imo.

[@chiracultrainstinct3d629]

I think the sub/ CV issue and Match Maker is more important than overmatch these days

[@chenille28]

I really don't think so. People keep on bashing against subs and CV, but I have problems with those maybe one out of ten games tops. While I have full overpens salvo with BB on broadside cruisers almost every game. And to be fair, 50% of the sub players are not playing well enough to pass then 5 min mark. That said, double CV or 3+ subs game shouldn't be possible. But to me, having a sub and a cv in a game is not worse than having 4 or 5DDs in a game.

[@chiracultrainstinct3d629]

@@chenille28even if sub players are really bad, the fact that the class they’re playing is forgiving all the mistakes they make, that they are spotting you really easily and cancel any attempt to push, it’s really annoying. And even if in a game, a sub or CV is harassing me all the game and despite that, I still have a good score at the end, I will just have no fun in this game. And the Match Maker is tragic these days.. I have more and more blowouts. But overmatch can be anoying but I still manage to get good scores and games in cruisers with it

[@baohoang4966]

PQ keep bragging about the punishment issue Meanwhile German BBs with gigantic Superstructures that take damage anyway so they don't wanted and don't need any silly punishment involved: "WTF, are you being serious??"

[@i4y]

With more consistency on broadside's this game will lean more towards skilled and/or experienced players and that's exactly the opposite of what WG seems to want. I'm thinking they're making more money on newer players expanding their fleet than on the older players who are getting annoyed with Subs, CV's and powercreep.

[@MGEnforcer]

Not sure I would agree with ya on this one. Bring a NM into a tier 8 match is already tough. Decent guns, but, oh is she slow. I know as a tier 8 cruiser, if I see a NM, I am all in for burning her down. So, with a T8 NM basically, I think having a ship with no citadel and a decent burn chance vs T10 ships is a fair trade. Everything is faster than you when you are up tiered. So, whatever flank you choose to fight on, there is no retreat from it. If the HE is powerful, I think that would be fine because as one of the slowest ships around, everything will focus on you and try to farm some damage.

[@carrier_taiyou]

The DD accuracy on a cruiser is why I absolutely love the Zao, the ability to consistently hit 8/12 shells on a DD at 9km is disgusting. Tennessee sounds like the same deal.

[@raduvicolov2550]

Regarding overmatch you are totaly right...frustrated to seeee how "i am punished for angling right". And no score on full broadside against enemy ships 3 salvo on row.

[@LiquidCat-k5w]

Just completed the event and got the ship for free. Overall very easy missions and surprisingly low monetisation

[@joshtheking1772]

I just may have to buy my first ship. Just because i live in Tennessee.

[@ombraforza5780]

I wish AA could be repaired

[@bradenhagen7977]

Made more sense back when you could De-plane CVs. Destroyed AA is so archaic.

[@captain.foxtrot]

Love the addition of historical interesting ships!

[@ForeverDoubting]

I just got this out of a Leyte Gulf container, I'm so happy :D I love these types of higher accuracy BBs.

[@Mobo___]

unlucky man if you had waited for you to get it through the web Campaign you could have gotten it and the enterprise

[@Nassamest]

You say you wanted a ship like this but the Wisconsin already is in the game

[@pdorn1]

Perhaps some rephrasing may be (in) order, but Wisconsin is a dockyard ship unlikely to come back for a looong time, if ever. Interestingly, Tennessee is even more accurate than her. According to shiptool, at 12km Tennessee's dispersion is ~30m tighter.

[@faynk.6247]

​@@pdorn1yeah but Wisconsin have the access to the high-tier american aiming mod they are roughly the same tbh

[@Frigidblood]

Wisconsin will still overmatch the bow of basically every cruiser in its MM spread. Not so with Tennessee, who can only overmatch most lower-tier cruisers and the superlights at same and higher tiers.

[@OdiArs]

So between this and Brandenburg, which one you'd more inclined to play?

[@danielsherrill7085]

I was hoping to see USS Washington introduced into the game and she would get this kind of gun treatment, since Admiral Willis Lee was known for his commitment to accuracy and gunnery

[@wynlord]

Bought 5 boxes, got the TN, took the grind at my leisure. Lucky.

[@stephen1r2]

That one black gun per turret was messing with me; I'm like "is this another Colorado hull?"

[@Comanderkraus]

What crosshair do you use in the video? tks!

[@Joey_Liu]

Love to see you try out the Indianapolis. Loving the consistent cruiser hunting experience!

[@GodOfWaaar]

I came here after watching Trenlass video on it. PQ, I didn't watch your video yet, but as soon as I saw Trenlass video, I thought about you. XD And your video title looks promising. :3

[@GodOfWaaar]

thx, good video. You ARE the most interesting BB player/streamer.

[@GodOfWaaar]

oh hell no, 80€ for a t8 ship? NEVER

[@jefff4848]

My father was a 5" gun crewman on the Tennessee so naturally I was hoping for a secondary focused ship but I'll take it all the same.

[@rHaruka19]

Colbert has 32mm everywhere and even Edinburgh has 30mm bow and stern

[@stefanocrosazzo3262]

What? That's simply not true

[@bigboyhotstuff]

In what world? Colbert is 16mm now and stern

[@Melrieoi]

​@@stefanocrosazzo3262 On Legends ships have different armor characteristics I think.

[@stefanocrosazzo3262]

@@Melrieoi yes but this video isn't about legends

[@daisywalker119]

Perhaps I missed it but when does the Tennessee release for sale in the armory? Thanks in advance :)

[@subodhsrinivasamurthy6866]

Hopefully the campaign thing to obtain this ship is not very hard.

[@abcdangdang]

Isn't Tennesse just New Mexico Guns on a Colorado hull?

[@coralski9373]

Guns that reward your good aim and positioning are nice! Who would have thought!

[@zb10948]

They should just implement different dispersion for different shell types. That would fix a lot of issues, not only this ship.

[@loading...938]

I’ve noticed the new crosshair you’ve started to use in your recent videos. Do you think the diagonal lines have been helping you at all?

[@bradenhagen7977]

Ah yes the most OP feature. Shells going where you aimed. If it worked for Whiskey it can work for this one too.

[@davis6048]

When does this start... what day can I pick up this ship for sale?

[@metavault0923]

Okay WG were great this time guys, the mission chains are really eazy, i mean it would be ez regardless, but we can even grind it on the star trek event(30 citadels? SO EAZY), so its reaaaaaaaaally eazy luckly, and it is a absolutely amazing ship, loved it

[@beardumaw24]

I think less concealment and lower HE damage would be more than enough nerf to this ship. Its slow and with less concealment it would get punished alot more. Dont know that it needs to be citadeled easier that might be to much nerf, maybe a little easier ? 🤷

[@davesbibliotheca6107]

southern man don't need anyone around 😎

[@Snagabott]

Hmm... the shells are the same as NM, both for AP and HE. Why would the regular ship want to use AP if this uses HE? A miss is a miss after all, while a less accurate HE hit does more than a less accurate AP hit...

[@SeedSnatcher]

The HE is about the same as New Mexico's HE. I think the reason it's so strong is a consequence of giving it cruiser dispersion and a slightly faster reload speed. BB HE is probably not meant to be that accurate.

[@Berthold-s9c]

I got the ship from the web adventure event for free, and I will say that this ship is just fun for me wheather I get huge damage or not, win or not, especially in ranked.

[@user-yw9fm7kb1s]

The final mission is actually really easy. Rare wargaming win.

[@armydudert]

I just wish if we nerfed overmatch in some way/buffed CA armor we could give all BBs battlecruiser dispersion Battle cruisers cruiser dispersion and cruisers DD dispersion like the zao line. Probs will need an HE nerf to go with it but it would be a much more enjoyable AP experience IMO.

[@tacojoe4688]

You really don’t need a big citadel on this ship if you go broadside it will take hella damage from ap pens

[@waverleyjournalise5757]

This game has a battleship problem and WG aren't even trying to hide it

[@tahzib1451]

we got pre refit Tennessee in Legends at T5 (T6 in PC) and refit California is T6 (T7 in PC)...i just unlocked this tennessee today in PC, and dont understand the logic of putting this in T8 instead of T7

[@JamesKintner]

Definitely love this ship!

[@CejkaF]

I don't want the game to become some angling simulator. I think how good a player plays comes down to how he knows his ship and what he can afford with it.

[@gasainagaro6064]

you should try or give tsurugi more attention, it s the perfect bb to my mind

[@AlanRoehrich9651]

I've been wanting this one. Badly. My damned computer crashed last Monday morning, and still isn't fixed. I hope I can get it fixed in time. Got the Tennessee. Worth every bit.

[@milesalpha1]

Do the missions, with the easy rewards of Star Trek it is a piece of cake.

[@quoniam426]

Condirering that's essentially a slow T6 ship that's gonna encounter T10 ships, being more difficult to Citadel hit it a good thing, especially given the absolute crap ton of HE spammers at these high tier games... Having a good concealment is nearly nothing in High tiers because of CVs, Radars, Hybrid ships with planes, and submarines, even playing DD is a nightmare.

[@nunyabiznesssame2371]

when is this ship coming out

[@nailbombx2311]

Just got this today, Got upteired and Ap really struggled, so many non pens...

[@bugycowboy7172]

i think before changin every battleship in the game , they should fix the ui and aiming bugs this game can't taken be seriously in e sports because its buggy and after that they should remake the cvs and subs cvs couldn't spot very well with strike planes and to spot they have to launch spotter planes , surface ships should be able control everything on their ships so you can defend yourself better against planes and cvs should very week against fires and can't launch planes while burning and they shouldn't have any automated stuff and cvs should have limited planes as well as every single ship so if your ship has two catapult launchers that means you can only launch two planes and if they got taken out then thats it no more planes for you but every single map should have an island as a designated base to rearm and repair modules of your ships and just modules not health and capture points unlocks more bases like this so playing objective will be vital and people will play aggressively to take advantage of those bases also surface ships spotter planes act as cv spotter planes so you can control your spotter plane and plane asw should be spotter planes because its realistic and make more sense than spawning planes from nothing and spotter planes could deploy smoke but to do that they have to give up depth charges which is also real and cvs couldn't lay mines cuz ship based planes can not carry and deploy mines its we ge bullsh*t speaking of spawning planes the duch cruisers bomber planes should come from off map so it takes longer for them to strike and they should do a dive bombing strike instead of weird balloon bombs and number of planes shouldn't exceed 6 and to throw a bone they should be able to lock on to the enemy ship but they should be easier to take down like shooting down fighter planes so if someone is tunnel visioned and sailing alone they can get punished with those planes subs shouldn't have homing torps cuz its cold war tech instead they should have gyroscope torps after tier 7 which allows you to launch torps with arc so if there is a ship to your starboard and you can just torp it without turning your sub that was actually a real ww2 tec and germans had more crazy zig zagging gyroscope torps to guarantee hits on ally convoys also the fastest sub should be doing 25 knots and they should take massive damage if they receive a direct hit before i forget spotter planes shouldn't increase your range and only ships with built in radar should lock on to enemy ships so lock on feature should be available to 1942+ ships and older ships except their 1942+ refits shouldn't lock on and lock on should be optional also to increase range all you had to do is just pressing a button so crew will load more powder and more powder more range but it will impact your reload so you trade range with dpm and only big caliber ships should be able to do that like 10" above , watch the reload of battleships and you see they got a standard big bag of powder and little additives under water citadel is actually a real thing its not we ge bulsh*t , i know its crazy but if you hit the barbettes then you may detonate the powder in the elevators and it causes a chain reaction and reach to ammo stowage and the ship goes boom thats how hms hood got sunk because they left the blast doors open to increase the reload and paid dearly for that mistake magic buttons should be removed and all ships should have battle station readiness button that decides what your crew do so you can pull them off from their battle stations into ship interior and they act as repair crew and decrease fire and flood duration but your secondary and aa guns won't work and its takes a minute to call them in or out which is also a real procedure or your sec/aa gun crew helps main battery crew and that increase the reload or they help engine department and that increase acceleration , rudder shift and speed all secondary guns and aa should have longer ranges by default , a 6" secondary gun should reach 7km and 8" should reach 9km by default and aa guns should have 8km range 6 km effective range on aa cruisers and cvs should control more planes , they could just launch all of their planes which would take 7 minutes so they can sit half of the match and do massive single strikes or lose all of their planes or they can do strikes with x amount of planes it could be 1 or 10 this should be in power of player not the cv and yes cvs should do cross drop because its real thats actually not we ge bullsh*t but you can defend yourself with your aa since you can control them like main battery guns and the only plane that could do massive dmg would be dive bombers , ap rockets shouldn't do dev strikes or he bombs and rockets shouldn't do as much as dmg as two conqueror salvos and jets shouldn't exist and planes with armament should be slow and handle like a truck but they should be very fast after they dropped their load and you can use any plane without armament ( bombs , torps , rockets ) as fighter planes also battleship or cruiser fighter planes should have 7 km range instead of 3 so yeah thats a long list to make this game realistic enough to make sense but not turn into simulation , i am not talking about wt damage models or causing flood with ap shells just enough realism to make sense but the gameplay still arcade , ships still respond faster and goes faster , you won't die to single flood or ammo explosion won't split your ship into two , unattended fire won't destroy your modules and k*ll your crew and your ship won't become less responsive if you lose more crew and you won't can die if you lose all of you crew , a singular torp won't can end your 100k tons battleship , aa guns can't fire up to 15 km and radar won't detect both surface ships and planes 15km away so if you play wt you are gonna deal with those and many people don't like to deal with that and not many people play wt naval also because its draining your resources cuz how could you know maintaining a battleship is expensive

[@GRIGGINS1]

I have 2 tier 8 Battleships the Iparanga and the Bama. I want to get a tier 9 Battleship now.

[@553095481]

if the lesta's armor-falling-off mechanism gets into wg, this ship is gonna be crazy good

[@Mthammere2010]

I don't know what your complaining about; Tennessee has the same or extremely similar Citadel placement to Weat Virginia, California and New Mexico.

[@davidb3155]

I wish all US bbs came with defensive aa.

[@Lily-D1215]

so it has a lot of upsides, including insane dispersion and good reload for these guns. but where is the reloadbooster? :P isnt it missing something?

[@RadonPaladin]

Vanguard kinda feels like the battleship PQ is describing. Accurate guns, but only 8. Limited overmatch ability, squishy, vulnerable citadel, but good speed and maneuverability. Good concealment, but not the best. It's pretty gimmick free to be honest.

[@JasonBlack66]

can we still get it?

[@VengerDFW]

"Over 13 Thousand damage from one salvo into a Vincent" Good, eff that ship. No ship is gonna be considered "too much" while that napkin tardbarge remains un-nerfed.

[@5kgBirnen]

i dont want bow in cruisers to be invincible so either HE damage against cruisers should increase or overmatch should stay otherwise imo

[@snorkman2]

Yep, campy Demoines are just as bad as subs without a way to dig them out.

[@boon1580]

dat first broadside shot... stable like fkin formation flight in airshow.. op ship

[@lidlpotato2047]

Theres no way this is gonna be OP, theyre 14 inch guns, it doesnt really matter how accurate they are. Pretty much anything at tier 8 or above can angle against it and be fine. Its a good design, as PQ is saying: if enemies fuck up, you get to punish them, but in return you have a lot of options against it. The ships that are actually OP are the ones where you dont get counterplay.

[@ToxicWeeb01]

Colbert with 32mm plating?! and here i am just wanting 25mm plating

[@aight111]

Kansas with NM guns with a cruiser dispersion?! Boy if I can trade 3 ships for that. I'll getting that 😂

[@tahzib1451]

Tennessee at T8?

[@anthonyn.9228]

Is it in game yet?

[@Goofynorwaymapper]

Can I still get Tennessee?

[@Jospeh-u3g]

i wish Tennessee on Legends was this good. It's equal to the N. Mexico on the Tech tree, but the Kansas line. They split at New York and go to Nevada. Maybe if we get a Tennessee '44 like this 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@jaysonnunley6602]

was this RU wows?

[@bombud1]

At 6:50ish you said you won't get cits against Tenn. But you got cit at 1:13 that same game.

[@123ikubuf]

how long is the event duration?

[@Bluhb1]

From October 9 through November 27

[@puckhead777]

That lemming move by your team in the first match is all too common today, sad.

[@02091992able]

More like a up tiered California but better is what some other people are saying about it.

[@BlackHearthguard]

Being broadside should _not_ be a mistake, historically that's what you're aiming to achieve. I don't even know how WG screwed that up so bad.

[@Wisconsam2117]

You're the only Ten I See PQ

[@bluearrow19greencomet71]

Let’s see a review of T5 Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya

[@user-jj2on8jy1e]

Tennessee played in the movie Alien Covenant

[@crapmalls]

So slow the battle is over by the time you get there 😂 just completed the grind

[@Mthammere2010]

CRUISER dispeesion? This was supposed to be the trait of West Virginia.

[@Phil1_427]

free ship lots of options to get it...its a win

[@MasterZeeeee]

Hmmm, big cits and accurate guns... In my OP, that would just leave a ton of crossfire shots Somehow, this ship feels like a good balance In order to balance right, WG would need to take a good look at sigma, dispersion, pen value and RNG Make it less pen but good spread you get a great HE spamer

[@PigPissBeUponThem]

I got a 5 pack of premium crates got Enterprise and was happy with that.