I was BANNED and What the Future May Hold For YouTube - ft. Steve Gosney

[@thechuckjosechannel.2702]

This Censorship on KZbin has gotten Worse over the Years, it's making me contemplate if I want to continue doing KZbin or not. I'm still working on videos for my channel but, This is getting Pathetic.

[@SlickBlackCadillac]

Odysee and Rumble having good content which is easier to find

[@Blizz3112]

so Killer Keemstar was right in the end... :-P

[@thechuckjosechannel.2702]

@@SlickBlackCadillac even if Rumble is a good idea for an alternative to KZbin, Alt-Tech Censors people as well. I am thinking of getting accounts on those 2. Including Bitchute and Minds.

[@crimadellaphone9374]

I'm just waiting for the new platforms, mainly Rumble, to create a smart TV app so I don't have to cut my PC on to watch what I watch for TV which is content.

[@crimadellaphone9374]

@@thechuckjosechannel.2702 Yeah, but sensible censoring is what exists on alternative platforms, not "I don't like you challenging the leftwing narrative so I'm going to censor you" which is the standard of YouCunt, Twatter and Facedick

[@teresabaker5113]

Hi Nick, I am a 68-year-old British Grandmother, who fears for the future of all our Grandchildren. I enjoy listening to your content, it's refreshingly interesting and educational, with a sprinkling of ‘tipsy’ mischief. Please don't give up on free speech!

[@Snakedude4life]

Totalitarians love keeping their rules nice and vague. The rules are formless and shapeless, they cannot be defined. And of course the excuse KZbin loves to give out is that if the rules were clearly defined; “people would walk up to the line and not cross it.” “We have a speed limit, We’ll just never publicly disclose exactly what that limit is and it’s your job to figure it out, Good luck!” 🎩 🐍 no step on Snek!🇺🇸🇭🇰

[@sapientunderground]

> people would walk up to the line and not cross it. Doesn't that give them what they should want, then? I don't see the problem. But yes, the socials and places like Steam, it is like you said, keep the rules vague so they can apply them inconsistently without being able to be held to account. Contemptible behavior, I can only hope the people who allow it see justice some day.

[@thefool8224]

@@sapientunderground .it will happen eventually. but maybe not in our lifetime

[@MrHawksrule95]

For some reason I read it as "Tortillans" and was really confused so I re read it and I'm much less confused now.

[@leradmuiel7634]

@@thefool8224 I hope I’m alive to see it. AlphabetINC needs to go.

[@charlessmith5465]

Imagine the feel of a lawyer who is told that he violated a rule but can't be told what rule that is. 🤣 Graduating from law school, pass the bar, etc. and then some algorithm spews such a canned response at you, kangaroo nonsense.

[@evanstheone]

Do more streams with Steve. That was a great one. He's endearingly dorky.

[@stevegosney]

Ha! My wife and I have been cracking up at that ... Thanks for the kindness and comment!

[@evanstheone]

@@stevegosney While I have your attention, check out a band called Hypno5e. Think they'd be right up your alley

[@stevegosney]

@@evanstheone will do!

[@stevegosney]

@@evanstheone Cool band -- will need to listen more deeply -- I like the light and dark

[@diamondsndhenna4784]

..... and so smart!

[@nerofiddles8798]

I'd chip in to a crowdfunded lawsuit against these tyrants if you're going to go after them.

[@leradmuiel7634]

Same

[@cheetobandido546]

Me too!

[@jackspring7709]

Some good news: the Fifth Circuit Court has just ruled it illegal for big social media platforms to ban, censor or suppress content based on opinion or political views - it's on it's way to the Supreme Court now and, if ratified by them, will become Federal Law. Dr. Steve Turley was talking about it on his channel earlier today.

[@pansophicallighthouse4046]

Midterms are almost upon us. That's all you need to know

[@ericsfishingadventures4433]

That's similar to what I was going to say.

[@Zach0451]

That doesn't really have anything to do with him being banned whatsoever.

[@Roadglide911]

@@Zach0451 it does if he doesn’t kiss a democrats a$$

[@BlueSatoshi]

He brought up a certain troon who's currently on a crusade to scrub any evidence from the Internet that they groom kids, among other things.

[@jimclayson]

@@Zach0451 You go ahead and give a reasonable explanation for why he's been banned, and I'll give your explanation some consideration. Until then, I don't think it's crazy to go with "if it quacks like a duck" and assume the worst about KZbin. Personally, I'm not completely sold either direction, but whether this was specifically a case of KZbin abusing their power to censor and influence for political reasons or not, it's something KZbin's absolutely been observed doing before. They haven't done squat to earn any trust and they've done plenty to destroy it. YMMV.

[@Gnrnrvids]

Nick, your Trump impression is always on point. Brilliant.

[@kathrynk4437]

Please sue the sh*t out of this platform.

[@DMF121]

If a Platform has it coming it's Definitely KZbin. Of Course along with Twisted Twitter an the way it Treats people who don't say what they want.

[@jackspring7709]

Some good news: the Fifth Circuit Court has just ruled it illegal for big social media platforms to ban, censor or suppress content based on opinion or political views - it's on it's way to the Supreme Court now and, if ratified by them, will become Federal Law. Dr. Steve Turley was talking about it on his channel earlier today.

[@Melbourne-s4x]

If he can't afford to be kicked off of youtube, he surely can't afford to sue them.

[@Melbourne-s4x]

@@DMF121 so why exactly are you here then?

[@eldarmark]

Fun fact: Josh from the Kiwi Farms had his phone cut off from Google out of the blue. No notification, his Google Voice line is just no longer working. No notification for people trying to contact him.

[@Julesrainbow79]

Ok?

[@JohnDoe-xf2ke]

Big G is evil.

[@eldarmark]

@@Julesrainbow79 Nick mentioned phone companies as common carriers. Just an interesting data point that Google, which is now blurring those lines with Google Voice and crossing them entirely with Project Fi, is violating common carrier law. With impunity.

[@nocakeforsusan8701]

This YT policy of striking a video with a broad violation based on an allegation(s) is (not) surprisingly similar to how many HR departments manage their organization. * An allegation is made * The reporter is anonymous to the accused * The accused is put on notice that s/he is under investigation * The parties are gagged from speaking about the allegation until the investigation is complete * The investigation is leaked to the rest of the organization * The accused is (many times) ostracized by other employees for fear of guilt by association * The investigation drags out * Morale suffers Result: Self censure and political speak rises

[@CariMachet]

Sounds like big brother daddy

[@martinjohnston1907]

So KZbin is a psychologically abusive spouse. You: "Why are you angry?" KZbin: "You know! and If I have to tell you it's because you don't really deserve to be with me!!!!"

[@sameash3153]

He does know though

[@The_Big_Jay]

The only part of law I am intimately familiar with is the Safe Harbor Protection act that KZbin tries to fall under. Essentially, the act stipulated that Platforms are not liable for the content distributed using the Platform. For example, if someone uploads a copyrighted show or song, KZbin cannot be sued for it, only the uploader can. This is because Platforms can't or don't have knowledge of what is on their Platform. You cannot be liable for something you have no knowledge of, and the Platform is so vast, that this is a reasonable thing to say. However, Safe Harbor Protection Act doesn't apply to Publishers, because by definition, they have knowledge of what they are Publishing. KZbin is trying to have it's cake and eat it too. It says that it cannot be liable for illegal or malicious acts performed on their Platform because they can't possibly know what's on there, while at the same time, dictating what can and cannot be on the site, saying that they *do* know what is and isn't on the site.

[@neszero]

sounds like a certain forum I’ve heard of should be protected under this act… wonder why they’re the exception

[@ozemale6t928]

Ask Napster how that argument went for them

[@ManOfEthnicity]

I had a new found appreciation for how complicated the English language is after working with a Dominican supervisor. I realized after speaking with him that most languages when spoken are pretty direct and state things as fact where as English, we tend to use similes and metaphors regularly to a point where a non native speaker, even if they know English, has no idea what the hell we're talking about.

[@suran396]

It works the other way, too. Speaking a foreign language, I had to he very careful not to literally translate an America ism. Not only would it not be understood, it would frequently be misunderstood, leading to embarrassment for all, but especially for me.

[@apocryphicdeath]

@@suran396 The only foreign language I'll speak is Spanish. And that's only because all of central America is moving in next door and babbling in their colonizing pig language. But I won't change how I speak. If they misunderstand my meaning then they should find a different culture to colonize and destroy.

[@anonony9081]

Someone needs to sue and get the ball rolling... Your case might not be perfect Nick but I think you should try

[@donnie1581]

After Texas V. Twitter, there is definitely an opening for lawsuits on big tech.

[@jackspring7709]

Some good news: the Fifth Circuit Court has just ruled it illegal for big social media platforms to ban, censor or suppress content based on opinion or political views - it's on it's way to the Supreme Court now and, if ratified by them, will become Federal Law. Dr. Steve Turley was talking about it on his channel earlier today. Donnie Adams has given a good summary of it above.

[@xBallsMcGeex]

The famous quote "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain" seems to apply to all Big Tech platforms. They are great platforms that are run by shitty people. They were great once, but the infiltration of these platforms by big corporations and celebrities trying to control what was organically grown by normal people has ruined everything. Money is a wonderful thing, but I'm under the impression that money horribly corrupted these platforms and destroyed the user-enjoyment they once had.

[@UltraKardas]

Donkey, I think this statement applies to anything large enough. I’d apply this to businesses, corporations and even states. Horrible people turn the golden state into the golden shower state.

[@touger9759]

Money is the root of all evil

[@DFPercush]

Google did nothing good for KZbin. I'm not even talking about moderation policy or algorithmic ranking anything like that, I mean the tech itself. All they did was remove features, over and over again. It's like going from a 3 monitor gaming rig with a stream deck and a sound mixer, to a 90's Macintosh with a one button mouse. It's like they're actually trying as hard as they can to kill it, but everyone is infuriatingly convinced that they have to be on here because that's what everyone else uses. Just like me I guess.

[@MentoDaSheep]

It's not the money. I think that the moment the platform grows, the owner of the platform suddenly realize they have great influence over the users, and then they are reminded of the quote: "With great power comes great responsibility...bility...lity....ty......" and so they force themselves into a moral conundrum, which they resolve by checking the smart people over at the academy about their thoughts of morals, and they learn the beautiful, sensual and all-mighty embrace of ideologies like (but not limited to) Critical Race Theory, Queer Theory, Feministic Theory, etc.

[@touger9759]

@@DFPercush if I remember correctly Google bought KZbin and ran it at a lose to keep out anything new from being developed or able to compete. Once they had a virtual monopoly on the space they turned on the money.

[@JohnHenrysaysHi]

Congrats on the 470k on your return. I hope it doesn't happen again.

[@dr.jonpatrickanderson]

I am sad about the ban. Your law firm has been very informative and a great help to me.

[@VictorLugosi]

Lies!! His law firm raped me last night 😟😟

[@stephjezo6470]

He is back, should be live tomorrow night. Mrs. R had a medical procedure today and she needs rest tonight.

[@kevinrichey8994]

1q11

[@dukeladderman1938]

This censorship BS is why I never send super chats, sign up for premium or join channels. I don’t want YT to get any money from me at all.

[@spider-neet9463]

Steve is such a treat man please have him on more

[@SaltStorm007]

LMFAO.....you have people who’s first language isn’t English....policing channels on what they said...IN ENGLISH💯😂

[@joeblow5214]

Followed you over on Rumble it was great. Had had to watch replays because of work most of the time. Glad you are back to grifting YT.

[@goosebump801]

Thanks for clipping this! Excellent, succinct recap 💐

[@smlegler]

I was permenantly banned from Twitter. 13 years and a 1-strike system. I can agree that I was wrong in my comment on a video (a young white punk harrassed and punched an orthodox Jew). My comment was "why is everyone watching and video recording... the dude needs his arse beat." They felt that was targeted harassment. No warning... just a permenant ban. Very upsetting. Tried to appeal twice and twice I was told "no."

[@vrilvanir]

This was one of my favorite episodes in recent memory. As a fellow bassist, Gosney is the GOAT 🙏🏻🤘🏻

[@stevegosney]

Thanks bud!

[@grahamokeefe9406]

Yeah, I thought the Internet was going to be great for free speech back in the Usenet days. Now I think the Internet is the greatest population control system ever devised.

[@Ed-ip2sg]

I’m hoping that one of the outcomes of the Texas lawsuit is that YTCCP and others will have to give you exact reasons and independent review before they take you off.

[@terminsane]

Gosney is a great guest. I hope he keeps coming back

[@maholla7688]

Nick follow the salty cracker model. Start your stream give a tease post your RUMBLE link and switch over to RUMBLE! Viva does this as well. This is ultimate censorship. F utube!

[@cheetobandido546]

I agree except I have my doubts about Rumble. I think the most important thing is the creation of many platforms in order to avoid centralization.

[@nuclearmedicineman6270]

KZbin's business is selling ad space on content. Creators sign a contract (in the form of the ToS; terms proffered, terms accepted), then they provide content for KZbin, and receive an agreed upon portion of the profits on those ad sales. That makes creators KZbin's subcontractors. So, if youTube unilaterally changes the contract, or refuses to honor it based on vague reasons, they're in breach, and can be sued. Liable for damages, loss of earnings, loss of future earnings. Right? Why not?

[@Lovemy1911a1]

Unfortunately it doesn't work that way. Part of the TOS is that KZbin can change them however and whenever they want. So they can hide behind that a lot.. Second KZbin (Alphabet) is a multi-hundred billion dollar international entity with deep political ties & many other similar entities with similar interests to have the law interpreted in ways favorable to them. So they tend to just win.

[@rossevans11]

Says a man who hasn't actually read their TOS.

[@Lovemy1911a1]

@@rossevans11 it says it under the section About This Agreement. "We may change this Agreement, for example, (1) to reflect changes to our Service or how we do business - for example, when we add new products or features or remove old ones, (2) for legal, regulatory, or security reasons, or (3) to prevent abuse or harm" They also openly state that use of the service is subject to Community Guidelines. Which also mentions that they are "regularly updated" aka changed. You were correct I had not actually read the TOS however I've been around long enough to know all of these big media sights include crap like we can change the rules and if you don't like it leave.

[@rossevans11]

@@Lovemy1911a1 Which free market fundamentalist Nick should fully support.

[@Lovemy1911a1]

@@rossevans11 maybe he does, you should ask him instead of changing the subject.

[@thealmightytruffles9622]

Hey Nick, a lady Jan Lewis DID sue Yt for violations of Covenant of Good Faith, and their limited liabilty clause basically got upheld. check in to it cause i dunno lawyer speak but yeah

[@iDEATH]

Glad to have you back, Rackets. I mean, it'd be better if alt tech platforms could really take off and provide the same user experience and comparable monetization, but this'll do for now. It's also good to hear Lady Rackets is doing well (I saw that over on Locals); I hope she has an easy and speedy recovery.

[@carlc1864]

I would like to see an amendment similar to a 14th that applies to monopolies and potentially other significant companies that can exercise significant power that resembles tyranny. No Monopoly shall make or enforce any policy which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any Monopoly deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its service or employ the equal protection of policies and law. It may need work to address the “what about”s. However, I prefer this over offering them protections that they hide behind.

[@phonepunk7888]

It seems like companies have switched the producer consumer relationship. Maybe we can argue that the product we are consuming as users of KZbin is itself the ability to produce videos on KZbin. Thus when you are unable to do so you are affected in both ways.

[@jackspring7709]

Some good news: the Fifth Circuit Court has just ruled it illegal for big social media platforms to ban, censor or suppress content based on opinion or political views - it's on it's way to the Supreme Court now and, if ratified by them, will become Federal Law. Dr. Steve Turley was talking about it on his channel earlier today.

[@muleteam66]

Rumble on over.

[@VictorLugosi]

Rumble has the same policies and will start doing it soon.. look at their “hate speech” policy..

[@rosalindalozano233]

Absolutely love your channel!!

[@CharlesKhan]

KZbin sucks and it will eventually fail, just like Myspace and Yahoo and it's going to be really quick when it does fall off.

[@Lesnooch]

The exact moment a viable alternative to KZbin pops up, KZbin is dead. However, it has been made very difficult to set up viable alternatives.

[@LarsLarsen77]

It won't until someone kills it. Why aren't we doing this? Microsoft taught us how to do it already. EMBRACE, EXTEND, EXTINGUISH!

[@fnspidey3825]

myspace was a better platform then facebook

[@lottery248]

@@Lesnooch those negligible alternatives are rising up real quick, but they tend to think that wasn't even true.

[@linda4403]

Get off KZbin if you really want to make a difference. They have no incentive to change as long as you are all making money for them.

[@skyknight0408]

This won't get better until someone actually sues them over it!

[@bobbygetsbanned6049]

What about the whole KZbin Partner Program thing? A partner in business is usually a part-owner of the business, but youtube seems to strategically mix in the term creator, and gives creators/partners basically none of the rights a partner typically would have. How is that a binding partner agreement, that's mutually beneficial, when you don't get any of the standard partner benefits? It's much more like a contractor relationship than a partnership.

[@paulosullivan3472]

What is sad is that even if youtube is eventually properly dealt with the people who have abused this power will still get away with it, none of them will face jail time.

[@chiefkeef74]

Lucas will never be a real woman

[@jackspring7709]

Actually - the Fifth Circuit Court has just ruled it illegal for big social media platforms to ban, censor or suppress content based on opinion or political views - it's on it's way to the Supreme Court now and, if ratified by them, will become Federal Law. Dr. Steve Turley was talking about it on his channel earlier today.

[@BDE360]

I would bet legal bytes has kissed the hand of KZbin to get her major competition out of the way

[@VictorLugosi]

Hand? She looks like she kisses more than hands

[@jenifernavarro6705]

Storm is coming. It's inevitable.

[@nadagabri5783]

Great guest

[@pwilly_1]

New Texas Law which essentially forbids censorship by large social media companies b/c they are essentially a public utility, b/c of recent ruling is on its way to the US Supreme Court. All of Rekieta’s subs & members being denied access to content they’re entitled to may provide Rekieta Law a cause of action against YT & any other social media company that censors or bans content as well as for shutting down a channel..!

[@zdtvcomet]

He sounds surprised people aren't suing KZbin, but I'm gonna bet there is a binding arbitration agreement in the TOS.

[@rossevans11]

The TOS is airtight, because it will have been put together by world class lawyers, who know the relevant law inside out. Nick by contrast, has neither of these attributes.

[@PLdemorygray]

Thanks for the explanation of 230 protection. This was easier to understand than the livestream in front of the sex swing bed.

[@susanterry3687]

Great to have you bk.

[@jamesf333]

What would be a game changer would be if platforms like KZbin where forced to show exactly what they where banning you for. Ie the exact letter of the law. That would make life much more interesting

[@Butterflyyyxoxo]

Eh screw em. You're better off on a platform that isn't going to do this on a whim.

[@skellygore]

I don't think it'd be desirable or even fix the problem to treat websites as common carriers, but all the services that a website relies on to exist like hosting, domain registrars, payment processors, DDoS protection etc. could be common carriers because that's where the coercion to censor usually comes from, and they usually don't even know what their own customers are using them to host pretty similarly to phone calls.

[@chinogambino9375]

Banks and payment gateways shouldn't be able to select their customers or interfere in legal transactions. That is the biggest impediment to competition and free speech in the US. It would be a miracle if any of these power structures were challenged though.

[@pattil7947]

I was wondering where you went Nick! Glad you’re back brother! 👍👋🥰❤️🙏

[@ericlassin953]

I 100% prcent knew and expected this to happen to Nick. Sad but true. That's where we are.

[@ewebster509]

That’s not right, they should tell you. I don’t understand why this is happening so much lately.

[@ericsfishingadventures4433]

Wrong think and wrong political opinion. They've made that obvious. And that's just a couple of reasons.

[@invaderHUNK]

I wonder if it’s happening now so hard because a certain someone snowballed into becoming very influential? 🤔

[@TheBlockerNator]

1:10 - I'll tell you the reason. You're a right leaning voice on KZbin. That's it.

[@nottmarketing]

Nick, do you get a cut of the purchases made on ads running on your channel? Your late night shows are an insomniac's dream. Love putting on one of your 3 and a half hour long after-midnight broadcasts to settle in when I'm unable to drop off. You also have the best outro on the net. Bless you and your loved ones.

[@RekietaLaw]

I do not get a cut of purchases for ads.

[@KimberlyCreates]

I agree!

[@douglasfielder6977]

Look at latest law in Texas about sensorship. The court fight as Facebook saying their right to free speech is being denied if they are not allowed to sensor content they do not like

[@avehein]

I loved Steve's performance in The Burbs.

[@KM-zu9we]

No worries, I’m already following you on rumble.

[@APL314159265]

Let me introduce you to the Ewe Tube compliance officer Mr. Benjamin Dover.

[@aSinisterKiid]

Don't forget his assistant Eileen Dover

[@CP2468]

I like Steve

[@stevegosney]

Aww ... thanks ... I like you too

[@catblack184]

Everything gets circled back through the Department of Loopholes and you never see it again.

[@barfiemcflatus3729]

We're watching the internet itself slowly dividing

[@jamescausey3399]

They need to be sued

[@roccopantaloons9115]

KZbin: Like sustaining without knowing what the objection actually is.

[@antiqueinsider]

First we had 'too big to fail', and now we get 'too big to challenge'!

[@nachokitty7617]

PLEASE come back! There is no where to post “What, if anything…” when lawyer says it in AJ trial!

[@TexasMagnolia]

I keep thinking of: Americans have a Right to face their Accuser’s. @KZbin

[@FranktheDachshund]

This is a sad state of affairs. A company with this much influence, should not be allowed to make their own rules. Especially arbitrarily enforced rules that are in opposition to the Constitution of the land.

[@Sunshinery]

Steve Gosney YOU NAILED IT!!!!

[@meredithisme3752]

I actually have noticed KZbin is very poor quality these days very surprised very little good content and that's probably why good content removed

[@AL-ws5yi]

Thanks for the clip. It’s always informative.

[@c.a.g.3130]

Note that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Texas) recently upheld the constitutionality of Texas' law prohibiting content-based discrimination on social media platforms. Time for us all to incorporate in TEXAS!

[@rossevans11]

They can just claim another reason. You can't legally compel a company to carry content they believe (sincerely or not) is damaging their business by for example alienating advertisers.

[@c.a.g.3130]

@@rossevans11 You need to probe deeper than you have; the matter is more complex. The courts have yet to settle precisely what kind of 'company' these companies are. If they are determined to function as utilities, they are NOT free to censor content any more than the phone companies are, or the electric companies. Second, they maintain legal liability protection, as 'neutral platforms,' under Section 230 but, in moderating content, function as 'publishers' and are, therefore, NOT 'neutral platforns.' So, you are wrong. Companies, when providing near monopoly services in the public interest, MAY be compelled to accommodate that which they disapprove. We will have to see what the Supreme Court rules when the conflict between the 5th and 11th Circuits is resolved.

[@rossevans11]

@@c.a.g.3130 If I was wrong there would be one successful legal case against Google by a disgruntled former channel owner. Thus far, it's a big fat zero, and it isn't for want of people trying.

[@c.a.g.3130]

@@rossevans11 The law has been enjoined pending litigation, dummy.

[@bradhobbs6196]

Nick, I'm thinking that the recent 5th Circuit ruling is going to be a solid basis for fighting KZbin arbitrary shennanigans going forward.

[@rachelolson5488]

I enjoyed this immensely!

[@sherriewestfall4920]

Can’t wait to see you back!

[@tanvirkabir4960]

Check if any streamers (Lawyer/Lawyers) are involved in this including their viewers.

[@txgho634]

Less than halfway and YT has interrupted with 3 ADs.

[@Drayden42]

Steve was a great guest. Hope to see him back soon

[@GypsysMom]

Isn't what KZbin does rather like the Kafka novel The Trial?

[@TheOriginalJAX]

Yup bring back title 2 and section 230.

[@diamondsndhenna4784]

I aspire to be as educated at that man.

[@stevegosney]

Aspire to be moral and true. Education has no relationship to ethics.

[@diamondsndhenna4784]

@@stevegosney I have that, now I want the clear reasoning and information recall that he has. I like that guy a lot.

[@Dallen9]

16:26 Nick section 230 actually has provisions of services that forums and social media platforms are supposed to provide. it's piggybacked on the Telecommunications Act of 1986 which covers Bulletin Board Systems. No judge whose ruled on a case involving Section 230 has actually read the law in Question, even though these Social media companies violate section 230, No judge wants to rule against them.

[@MrCoxmic]

the utility argument is the most basic but the government is in the pockets of big tech

[@ozzybloke-craig3690]

People meed to start suing YT then. You lawyers need to take action and set a president for that bs. It is not ok to stop businesses making money. Especially in Capitolist America.

[@morrisfletcher9075]

Suspended, banned means you don't come back.

[@ffspolly4407]

Loved this stream. ❤

[@LindaJones-dk3fz]

Nick, why don't we crowd fund for money and take it to the one lawyer who is up on employment law - Camille Vasquez!! 😁😁

[@grbdevnull5611]

Enjoyed the original stream, and enjoyed the clip again.

[@cirno4820]

VISA and MasterCard are a bigger priority. They should be made common carriers.

[@Muck006]

The last statement/solution by Nick has one hole: SHADOWBANNING ... which is "breaking the EVERYONE GETS TREATED THE SAME clause", but which is NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE and might even be PART OF THE ALGORITHM! The THEORY needs to always be compared to the REALITY ... when coming up with solutions, which is why many ideologies/-gists show themselves to be WRONG/BAD by only ever CLAIMING things but never PROVING things.

[@Lizardo451]

Need consumer legislation to impose fairness in user agreements.

[@nomosma]

Amen Nick speak the truth!

[@quantumthuglife4444]

We love Rekieta Law!!!!

[@nedludd3641]

Never mind all the legal malarky. What is that guitar behind the other guy? Looks like an Ibinez maybe, with twin humbuckers?

[@stevegosney]

Spector NS-4

[@nedludd3641]

@@stevegosney - Oh wow, a bass guitar. Do you play in a band? What's your fav flavour of music? The late/great John Entwistle rules (or rather ruled, 1944-2002). What amp do you use with that monstrosity? :)

[@stevegosney]

@@nedludd3641 Ha! I used to play in bands. GK RB800 through 4X10 Hartke was my rig. Now it is a Hartke HD500. I love all sorts of music, but back in the day I played Iron Maiden, The Police and Rush.

[@nedludd3641]

@@stevegosney - Sting was fond of laying down a driving bass line when he was in Police. 'Bed's too big without you' springs to mind. Like a Reggae-ish kinda thing. Funny, he sort of gave all that up and went all jazzy when he went solo.

[@nedludd3641]

@@stevegosney - I checked that amp out on YT - it's beast. I bet you were a big hit with the neighbours

[@agentmith]

Sounds like you had too much to think!

[@hashbrownsendittotheintern2738]

Could you potentially ban together with other KZbin channels that have also had this happen to them? Class action lawsuit maybe?

[@pathfinderlight]

Lawyers haven't sued big tech because of Section 230 protection...not what the actual statute says, but how it's interpreted.