I had to do a school project years ago on Burundi so it holds a place in my heart.
@stephen93814 жыл бұрын
Jacob Hogan my relationship with Malawi be like: “a fellow soldier”
@retf89774 жыл бұрын
@@stephen9381 I have a Malawi shaped hole in my Malawi shaped heart... Iove Malawi for some odd reason
@legendmk524 жыл бұрын
It's nice to see that other people love countries for not much of a reason. I like East Timor like that.
@UnitedKingdomOfAmerica4 жыл бұрын
I like Hungary because it's one of my ancestry countries
@hemmper4 жыл бұрын
20:08 In a survey the French even saw themselves as being the most arrogant country in the world. So that's another level of arrogant, knowing you are and not trying to change.
@SilvanaDil4 жыл бұрын
True, although a more recent poll showed that Indians have the biggest disconnect between how "great" they think their country is versus the reality.
@Iramico4 жыл бұрын
hemmper well it makes sense .. their symbol is the rooster, the only animal that stands proud even when standing in shit .. at least that’s what one of my (French) teachers used to say
@SilvanaDil4 жыл бұрын
@@Iramico - LOL! (My French teacher had a rather large ... bosom. Her nickname: Madame Beaucoup de Balcon)
@SuperSMT4 жыл бұрын
They're now in a month-and-a-half long strike because they want to be able to retire at 52... even after already having some of the best workers rights / conditions in the world
@Felishamois4 жыл бұрын
@@SuperSMT 62. It's 62.
@edgelord83374 жыл бұрын
The sultan of Oman lives in Zanzibar now. That's just where he lives.
@ivandjurdjevic74634 жыл бұрын
meta jay 404 r/commedycemetery
@MoonLab_Gaming4 жыл бұрын
*History of the entire world I guess*
@tipsgamez44474 жыл бұрын
Maybe he discovered it when looking for another way to India...
@titanfallsvlogs48984 жыл бұрын
*i guess we’ll have to find a new wat to india*
@Pugaroo854 жыл бұрын
r/unexpectedbillwurtz
@TheAttmaster94 жыл бұрын
BoganVille, new holiday destination for the aussies
@olympicegg68534 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@jeremyaugustine28383 жыл бұрын
Is it just me, or will that be the first country to have ville in its name?
@senhordoutorprofessormestr86293 жыл бұрын
Bougainville
@commemorative3 жыл бұрын
@@jeremyaugustine2838 Not sure it will be named after the island though
@just_some_guy_innit3 жыл бұрын
LMAOOOOOOO
@freehandclara40154 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Simon Bolivar (South American independence leader in the 19th century) wanted there to be a United States equivalent in South America
@Batcow-11384 жыл бұрын
With The countries of Venezuela Colombia Ecuador and Panama, thats why all except for Panama have similar flags nowdays
@sammybeaver91304 жыл бұрын
Brazil: Yes I know they are talking about the whole continent not just one country
@AlejandroRodolfoMendez3 жыл бұрын
Basically José de San Martin say that he shouldn't be a big douche, so that's why there's a statue of him in New York. Basically Argentina kinda do that but give the chance to each part of the colonies to be their thing or join, instead Bolívar wanted a big giant thing and be on charge.
@misterixray22513 жыл бұрын
Think at the national team of football 🤤 (MSN)
@EpicB3 жыл бұрын
Well, there was Gran Colombia. There was also the Federal Republic of Central America.
@dudamonas24504 жыл бұрын
One word for this channel: Underrated
@raxu36604 жыл бұрын
ok
@mynameiswalterhartwellwhite4204 жыл бұрын
@@raxu3660 no u
@HOVANA4 жыл бұрын
He has another channel which is much bigger
@dudamonas24504 жыл бұрын
I’m not talking about he’s first channel
@rakhatthenut38154 жыл бұрын
@@HOVANA namely THIS channel is underrated, not first
@Synthetica94 жыл бұрын
That jab at Burundi tho
@theodo36554 жыл бұрын
Hahahhaa truee
@lefrancoisvincent94293 жыл бұрын
Just remember 1995, Québec independence was WAY closer than any of those one, check Wikipedia on how it came close to becoming a country, even France was willing to recognize the independence😇
@beu92453 жыл бұрын
It really shouldn't say: 'Even France' it should day: 'ESPECIALLY FRANCE'
@Unknown.Stonks3 жыл бұрын
True
@lbgamer243 жыл бұрын
50.6 to 49.4 or something like that
@fel24thecat3 жыл бұрын
If Canada didn’t do shady things like spending much more money than allowed Quebec would be Independent today…I’m sad
@fel24thecat3 жыл бұрын
@@JFK19637 As a quebecer i have to disagree with you one that one
@agent_bedrock58443 жыл бұрын
I never noticed Switzerland is keeping their long running record of neutrality going not joining the EU
@endthisnonsense72022 жыл бұрын
They are voluntarily part of the EU suburbs, the EEA, meaning the have to comply just as a normal EU member, but don't have the veto on regulations that normal members have. It is membership without the sovereignty that comes with real membership, sort of being colonized by choice. There is a lot of unease about that with Swiss citizens who actually understand full membership compared to EEA brings more sovereignty.
@RedPandaStan4 жыл бұрын
I have no idea why you keep on mentioning california for independence. The movement never really gained any support out of slight media buzz.
@awesallemtheking25834 жыл бұрын
I'm kinda uncomfortable with his strong knowledge of the u.s by 4 mins in
@retf89774 жыл бұрын
Long live the cali republic
@lqenr524 жыл бұрын
yeah exactly, no one actually took the California independence thing seriously, California is a huge part of American identity no matter how different it might be from the other 49 states
@macekane4 жыл бұрын
Also, with the US constitution in the mix and revoking citizenship to those who vote no would never fly with the US.
@paigey-poo42354 жыл бұрын
It’s on their state flag and everything. They were really going for for a while. Now everyone just brings it up every few years.
@cearnold3 жыл бұрын
whenever I watch one of these videos I end up with 15 wikipedia tabs open and a google maps tab open to a weird region of the world
@_Abjuranax_4 жыл бұрын
The main problem with slavery and the Confederacy in the US is once you have a tiger by the tail, it is very hard to just let go without some very serious repercussions. Conflict over Slavery was almost guaranteed as soon as the Constitution was ratified, and every single US President up until Lincoln, did not want to be the one in office when the Civil War erupted.
@jeremiahblake39492 жыл бұрын
Lincoln didn't want ro be the guy who oversaw the war either which is why he took almost 2 years to propose ending slavery in the territories STILL REBELLING, it wasn't until the end of his term that he began moving for full abolition, ie once the war had been well won.
@BeyondtheBlade2 жыл бұрын
@@jeremiahblake3949 Well, lets not forgett Lincoln didn't even finish the civil war because he, uh, got shot in the back of the head. But furthermore, while it is said it was over 'states rights' even that is a blantent half truth: The civil war did not start because the north tried to fight slavery or anything. Rather, is was due to the fact that the south was attempting to expand slavery and, and the north, realizing this would put them at a political disadvantage, said no. After that, the south literally started taking forts before open war had even been declared. It is VERY safe to say the south fired the first shots in the civil war in nearly all accounts.
@jeremiahblake39492 жыл бұрын
@@BeyondtheBlade of course the South started the war. And it was about the states right to safeguard slavery which they thought the North would end once free states were the majority. My point is that it was likely an overreaction since even the abolitionist president didn't immediately end slavery when the war started
@frankskynyrd Жыл бұрын
@@jeremiahblake3949 I mean we don't have slavery in the US anymore so it probably wasn't an overreaction. Not condoning their actions, just disagree that they overreacted to political/social events. I mean, they were kinda right in their fear that the US government would end slavery cause it did.
@frozenpea18484 жыл бұрын
19:53 ,, They're like our closest neighbor ." Ireland: Am I a joke to you?
@cianmurtagh4684 жыл бұрын
shhhh the more british people consider ulster irish the quicker we end up uniting.....
@Inseut4 жыл бұрын
Toycat hates northern Ireland confirmed 😔
@Supreme_Commander-20073 жыл бұрын
Don't you get the British? They hate Ireland because they know they can't take control of it.
@lmiartegtra94124 жыл бұрын
United Arab empire: is no Toycat: is yes
@mikerplaysyt3 жыл бұрын
Toycat is always yes
@badryaalamri36273 жыл бұрын
Toycat is no cuz he is a bad kommiekat
@ananttiwari13373 жыл бұрын
@@badryaalamri3627 You are no
@escapefr0mslender3 жыл бұрын
@@badryaalamri3627 really!!!
@SaxandRelax3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Even though arabic is technically on language, people from saudi arabia can't understand people from algeria and morocco
@Thedimensionalwarrior2 жыл бұрын
Yeah but at least we all know how to speak formal arabic
@SaxandRelax2 жыл бұрын
@@Thedimensionalwarrior ofc
@Mlmylji2 жыл бұрын
As a saudi, can confirm 🤣
@greengreen1104 жыл бұрын
"things that have hapened in the last 100 years" * moves mouse over germany *
@Supreme_Commander-20073 жыл бұрын
lol
@Jotari4 жыл бұрын
"It's seven people" Shows a picture of eight people.
@graeme0113 жыл бұрын
In a picture of eight people, surely it is undeniable that there are (at least) seven people in the photograph. Besides, one of them could be an alien.
@Jotari3 жыл бұрын
@@graeme011 Well if there's a possibility that two of them are aliens then it's not quite undeniable that there's at least seven people.
@thyse353 жыл бұрын
Those are giants and the people are to small to be seen
@The_Alt_Vault4 жыл бұрын
What about the imperial federation, Intermarium or the Kalmar Union
@lukedetering44904 жыл бұрын
4:10 I'm no Confederate supporter, but I wouldn't say they were destined to lose. They had some smart generals and could overcome to barriers of being less industrialized. Had Lincoln not be as smart about his hiring and firing decisions and not utilized his technology like telegraphs and railroads correctly, the south could have made the civil war longer or even won independence.
@parryplaguedoc4 жыл бұрын
Also if Lincoln didn’t make the war about saving slaves some time in the war, the European powers would’ve joined the CSA in the war.
@tiaspalace64753 жыл бұрын
Also if the confederates had better manpower and more supplies. They would have probably taken Washington. They got very close during the battle of Gettysburg.
@thaddeuskyle5723 жыл бұрын
It could honestly be argued that the South lost as soon as they lost New Orleans in 1862, or at least lost in the west with that.
@carlosandleon3 жыл бұрын
Basically if the winner didn't do the things they did to make them win, they would have lost? Imagine my shock!
@guppy7192 жыл бұрын
The North had a much bigger population and was industrialized it was pretty much always going to win. The North really fucked up a lot of the early civil war with bad leadership. The Only way the south wins is with intervention form another country.
@teaarmo4 жыл бұрын
Hello, thought I'd let you know. I found this channel in the last couple weeks and it's since become one of my favourite channels. I've been binging through the entire channel. Keep up the great work, happy I've found it
@dudamonas24504 жыл бұрын
Me too
@maherhamadouch20054 жыл бұрын
Why can't Africa be one country? *Gaddafi enters chat* *Malcolm X enters chat*
@edgelord83374 жыл бұрын
Malcolm X had nothing to do with Africa and Gaddafi wanted to be king of Africa.
@maherhamadouch20054 жыл бұрын
@@edgelord8337 Malcolm had everything to do with Africa, and Gaddafi was a Ba'athist, we are Socialist Republicans
@rct3LP4 жыл бұрын
The same reason why Europe can’t be one country
@RookCooks4 жыл бұрын
rct3LP Europe can’t unite because of ideology Africa however is different with Culture being the reason Edit: what i meant by different is the difference of reason why they cant unite
@rct3LP4 жыл бұрын
KirbyFan3210 - and also thousands of different languages
@makelovenotwarnoob4 жыл бұрын
I think that EU will become a federation. It might take another 10-20 years but we have no other choice if we, as europeans, still want to have influence in the world. I think the European Federation will be a great thing.
@SilvanaDil4 жыл бұрын
In 10-20 years, the median age in Europe will almost equal the retirement age (unless you count Middle Eastern and African migrants).
@maherhamadouch20054 жыл бұрын
@Stacey Raven no we're not stupid, we need sovereignty over our lands, cos fuck a Euro empire
@KenrickBrown754 жыл бұрын
@@maherhamadouch2005 To be honest, your nation will have no sovereignty as a small, puny state. The only way to save your people is to unite with others. Take it from an American: a federal Europe will be a superpower.
@Alto534 жыл бұрын
@@KenrickBrown75 right. No sovereignty when it is it's own state? You don't know what the word means.
@maherhamadouch20054 жыл бұрын
@@KenrickBrown75 I won't take lessons from any American: 1 you began life as a colony, then began colonising other lands 2 the US is too diverse to stay as 1 nation
@SonOfMuta4 жыл бұрын
"There WILL be an independent Bougainville" Not necessarily. If Papa New Guinea doesn't want to let them go, they won't.
@jacktadema16924 жыл бұрын
The UN will most likely intervene if they try to stop it, like they did with East Timor.
@harsimaja95174 жыл бұрын
They have formally agreed to honour the result. If they don’t the UN would step in.
@eyesup41564 жыл бұрын
@@harsimaja9517 the UN are a joke. What would they do
@ancsuther3 жыл бұрын
@@eyesup4156 not related, but the UN wasn't made to stop all wars, it was to keep peace, not peace enforce
@eyesup41563 жыл бұрын
@@ancsuther Yes I know. That's precisely why it is a joke
@TurtleMarcus3 жыл бұрын
I remember during the 2015 New Zealand flag referendum, everybody thought it was a huge waste of time and money, and a poll showed that more people were willing to discuss New Zealand becoming part of Australia, than were willing to discuss getting a new flag. So someday there might be the Commonwealth of Australasia.
@chienbanane31682 жыл бұрын
New Zealand should join Austria instead, that'll show them
@Random_UserName42692 жыл бұрын
@@chienbanane3168 Then finally unite the Kingdom of Australia-Hungary
@AmandaHugandKiss411 Жыл бұрын
@@Random_UserName4269 that made my day 🤣🤣🤣
@tealmer35284 жыл бұрын
16:40 and uh Burundi exists
@alexanderkono63693 жыл бұрын
"All Arab countries speak the same language", I mean, technically yes, but also no.......
@_Lunare_3 жыл бұрын
Just speak fusha lol
@MarkDDG4 жыл бұрын
The Coat of arms of the Netherlands also has French on it. And our passport is in English, Dutch and French as well.
@clancywoods77283 жыл бұрын
Arabia: Unites Israel: **Laughs** I'm in danger
@Supreme_Commander-20073 жыл бұрын
Israel: *Sigh* Here we go again...
@cheezychad84742 жыл бұрын
It's actually very sad because a lot of Arab countries are now supporting Israel, so the hope of the Arab countries uniting to eliminate the neo-settler colonial state of Israel is gone.
@TAILSORANGEs4 жыл бұрын
Empire of Toycat: Fantastique.
@minhee74 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget Canada in 1995 The 1995 Quebec independence referendum was the second referendum to ask voters in the Canadian-French-speaking province of Quebec whether Quebec should proclaim national sovereignty and become an independent country, with the condition precedent of offering a political and economic agreement to Canada. 93.52% of the 5,087,009 registered Quebecers voted in the referendum, a higher turnout than any provincial or federal election in Canada's history. The proposal of June 12, 1995 was rejected by voters, with 50.58% voting "No" and 49.42% voting "Yes".
@joelfortin66344 жыл бұрын
This. I'm still salty
@inactive62004 жыл бұрын
Portgas D. MinHee that’s a bruh moment if I ever see one
@johioju59903 жыл бұрын
california will never be independent
@DerPinguim4 жыл бұрын
You could have mentioned how the south of Brazil (at the time, Brazilian Empire) actually became independent and started the "war of the Farrapos" (Guerra dos Farrapos), essencially like an American civil war.
@Inseut4 жыл бұрын
Yes. It's way more real than California independent 😂 Mas que barbaridade, tchê
@Inseut4 жыл бұрын
To be fair, Riograndense Republic got to be de facto independent from Brazil for some time, it was just unrecognized
@robertwilloughby80504 жыл бұрын
Anybody up for the Free Federated State of Yorkshire?
@jackharan37914 жыл бұрын
Yorkshire party for the boys
@annymous-bz2xx4 жыл бұрын
YeeeeeAaaaaaah
@alexpotts65204 жыл бұрын
Anybody from Yorkshire who might be able to help me on this - why is "Yorkshire" such a strong identity marker? I find this particularly strange as the counties of North Yorkshire (rural, middle-class) and South Yorkshire (post-industrial places that haven't recovered from Thatcher) are very different from each other.
@markcotton34814 жыл бұрын
@@alexpotts6520I think it's just because it's historic.
@Skye_At_Home4 жыл бұрын
98%... If only 98% of the world could agree on everything.
@pepp4184 жыл бұрын
"France, our closest neighbour. Closest ally." Ireland: *Cries in post-unionism*
@3506Dodge3 жыл бұрын
To equate California's discontents with the U.S. and secession movements elsewhere is ludicrous.
@guppy7192 жыл бұрын
There are no real secessionist movements at least in the actual states. Texas and California are memes and the Native Hawaiians who actually want sovereignty make up like 10% of the Islands population even if they all agreed.
@louiethepitt4 жыл бұрын
Again the Central American Union is ignored...this is like the 5th video related in which you pass on informing the audience about that union and the plans to form one country... is this a trend or an agenda? is there any personal problem you have towards central America?
@Alex-mr5ji4 жыл бұрын
louiethepitt maybe he doesn’t know you dumbass
@solstice12904 жыл бұрын
I looked around and I found nothing about a Central American Union that implies any recent efforts to form a political federation of some kind. So if I can't find anything about it while deliberately looking for it, maybe you shouldn't be so harsh about someone not knowing about it.
@louiethepitt4 жыл бұрын
@@solstice1290 can you guys google? it is called "Central American Integration System" look it up on Wikipedia... The organization to unite Central America started in 1951 like 6 years after the UN started, and begun integration since 1991 under SICA...it has a Flag, integrated court system and a Central american high court, it has a Parliament with elected officials, it will soon have a unify passport, it has an economic integration system with a Central American Bank and a common market, it already has circulating common currency, join Armed Forces...it has 8 member states Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Belize and Dominican Republic. when joined it will have the 5th highest economy in the american Continent and full control over south and north american trade and full control over Atlantic and pacific commerce all passing by land or by the Panama Canal.
@louiethepitt4 жыл бұрын
@@solstice1290 at the very least for what I know...living in CA for the last 5 years.... is that it is more realistic union and real union than the "French/British" union he talked about and some imaginary unions he has brought up like the "Celtic Nation"...lol...like come on guys.... not my fault the guy doesn't research... he has talked about potential countries, countries in formation, future countries, Federations, etc.... and he has never ever mentioned CA union... he once talked about "the country that existed for like 80 years and then separated" he did mentioned that "they were in plans to reunify" but it seems like he forgot about it and has not mentioned since. it has a common currency, very soon a common passport, a Democratic Parliament, join military forces, a high court system...like that is more real than the "celtic nation" or the giant "Eropean Union with russia" or the "UN Federation" come on guys!!!
@hellsing88434 жыл бұрын
that plan to unify started before the European Union, it has taken them more time but they will join, funny fact is that they were a country in the past called Federation of Central American States, and it had other names, back when it was part of Spain Empire it was called "kingdom of Guatemala" and later "General Capitany of Guatemala", it was also a State of the "Mexican Empire" for about 3 years.
@jakerocknic59183 жыл бұрын
Bougainville has an interesting language called Rotokas, (just thought I'd mention it)
@Inseut4 жыл бұрын
19:10 south america homogenous? Looooool even the Brazilian states are all too different one from another, imagine all the other countries. It's not because we speak mostly the 2 same languages (and a bit of French, a bit of Dutch, a bit of English) and we were colonized by the same people that we are homogenous.
@Inseut4 жыл бұрын
i don't think i put the right timestamp here because KZbin changed its app and it's all weird but anyway
@guppy7192 жыл бұрын
Its Homogenous compared to Africa or Eurasia
@alahiri2002 Жыл бұрын
In comparison to other continents (mainly Asia and Africa), the Americas are significantly more homogeneous. That doesn’t mean there are no regionally distinct ethnicities, but these differences are nowhere near as pronounced as those in places like Asia and Africa.
@parahandy90294 жыл бұрын
France spent hundreds of years befriending Scotland, to irk the English - England/France wanted to be friends for all of 15 minutes in the grand scheme of history. Your little Englander view is humourous most of the time, but this video is 15 kilos of pish...
@paulhartson14 жыл бұрын
You implied California is it's own country! LMAO
@paulhartson14 жыл бұрын
Berkeley, California would be an independent country too FYI
@paulhartson14 жыл бұрын
California would annex Baja California if it could. Mexicans would hate that.
@beyou18134 жыл бұрын
@@paulhartson1 yeah ever heard of the border war?
@shuggothgt20713 жыл бұрын
My home was ALMOST a country, the United Nations just failed to recognize me :(
@rustyshackleford234 Жыл бұрын
Molossia?
@saulenfischbearn74704 жыл бұрын
I came from school at the right time :o
@artham944 жыл бұрын
Plot twist: you came TO school.
@saulenfischbearn74704 жыл бұрын
@@artham94 At 1pm or something like that? xd
@SilvanaDil4 жыл бұрын
Likelihood of some you mentioned: ind. Scotland (medium); ind. Catalonia (medium); one or more ind. Canadian provinces (low, but rising); one or more U.S. ind. states (almost zero).
@naa59724 жыл бұрын
Quebec is possible but another canadian provinces? how?
@SilvanaDil4 жыл бұрын
@@naa5972 - Alberta & Sas aren't too happy these days; Trudeau's party doesn't have a single MP from either one.
@lycian1234 жыл бұрын
i live in Spain and all the media outside Catalonia report that it is most definitely not likely to become independent in the short or medium term. The politicians who attempted a breakaway were convicted in abstentia. The rest of Spain will not allow the region to separate.
@naa59724 жыл бұрын
@@lycian123 Why aren't they allowing catalonia to secede???? Isn't that just colonialism at this point
@tannerwilson48434 жыл бұрын
SilvanaDil I would put 🏴 high.
@schuwi44 жыл бұрын
You make geography soo interesting. All those little tid-bits of information about different countries makes me realize how diverse a place the world actually is.
@octavianpopescu47763 жыл бұрын
Burundi exists... daaaaamn... harsh 😃 Let's say something nice about them: they have a cool flag!
@matan29242 жыл бұрын
7:30 what? No they don’t. Australia, usa and the UK also all speak the same language. Doesn’t mean they want to merge
@edgelord83374 жыл бұрын
When someone says east Germany they think of the nation. I think of Prussia.
@billylauwda91784 жыл бұрын
*PRUSSIAN GLORY* *I N T E N S I F I E S*
@StarsManny2 жыл бұрын
Tasmania would be a great country! I know nothing about Tasmania and I've never been there, I just think they should be their own proud country.
@robinsteens41724 жыл бұрын
As a Belgian I can confirm that both sides are right, the brittish people as well as the french are arrogant :)
@theducc32034 жыл бұрын
I'm not arrogant :(
@niensaddestofthesad81514 жыл бұрын
La france iz ze land of ze hairy baguette and the UK is land of the stuck-up tea drinkers
@Aarontlondon4 жыл бұрын
Maybe you should learn how to spell ‘British’ before you affirm that entire nations arrogant.
@bruhtonbruhkkinson68484 жыл бұрын
@@Aarontlondon they're talking about people from Brittainy, what the fock you mean.
@Aarontlondon4 жыл бұрын
Velkayne of Lorvaesch Nojaeiro People from Brittany aren’t called ‘British’ or ‘Brittish’ you fucktard. Get your facts straight before getting involved in shit you don’t know
@Alex-wg9bi4 жыл бұрын
Thank you youtube for recommending this channel! Idk why but I love all of these geography videos. Can you do one on overseas dependencies/Caribbean constituencies of European countries? There are soo many little islands and it's all so confusing yet interesting. Keep up the great work toycat!
@HoodieProxyYT4 жыл бұрын
ooh 12 comments and 268 views... booganville is the best name ever
@joshmiddlebrook2394 жыл бұрын
Speaking of the confederacy, fun fact: Robert E. Lee was actually related to George Washington. His wife was the great-granddaughter of Martha Washington, George Washington's wife.
@unifiedhorizons26633 жыл бұрын
damn our founder was grandson couldn’t win a rebelling
@alahiri2002 Жыл бұрын
By your own words, that doesn’t make him related to George Washington. Only his wife would be related to George Washington (assuming he was the father of the line of children that Robert E. Lee’s wife supposedly descends from). There is a stark difference between having a distant family member and being related by blood.
@Taco_King002 жыл бұрын
A United Skandinavia would had been intresting. With Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark.
@tomasbindateplitzky9282 жыл бұрын
Well that existed, it was the Kalmar Union
@megposting2 жыл бұрын
14:45 tbh as an albanian-american i wouldn't say albania was basically a puppet state, albania had varied foreign relations during its time as communist. they were allied with the ussr, but in the late 50's albanian dictator enver hoxha pretty much decided that khrushchev wasn't a real communist and just a revisionist, so they split with the ussr. albania then allied with china, but hoxha ended up thinking china was too accepting to the west and split with them too, pretty much leaving albania all alone until they got rid of communism in the 90's.
@billieirish43692 жыл бұрын
I agree, the Arab world is very vage they all have the same language and culture, but they’re geographically as well as genetically very diverse! Culture wise they have ties to their ancient ancestors as well. I mean take a look at Iraq (Mesopotamia) and Egypt (ancient Egypt), so that would culturally separate them as well. Who will be considered an Arab? Some one who speaks Arabic? But this way many people from all around the would be considered Arabs just because they’ve studied the language in school for example. That’s like saying everyone who speaks mandarin is now Chinese.
@Sirtalksalotwithacrown2 жыл бұрын
The Arabian world might speak Arabic but some speak it in a different way, take the UAE 🇦🇪, they speak Arabic but it's way different than Saudi Arabia or syria, so it's interesting how Arabic works yknow
@vaticinus2 жыл бұрын
There are about 7,000 languages still spoken around the world so technically we should have 7,000 countries in the world. Not only Europe should have the privilege of a country solely for one language like french in France; german in Germany. etc,
@robsonwilianwinchester97263 жыл бұрын
Not that much away .you said if you're not American the confederacy of north and south America are far away from you if you're not American . Some of your viewers are not only from USA or UK or NZ and Australia am from Brazil for exemple. So not only Americans maybe most of the viewers but not at all viewers. I'm not English native speaker too.
@juliane__2 жыл бұрын
Lingua Franca is NOT a french phrase. The first part derives from Italian and the second part from Italian or maybe greek or arabic, meaning western europeans. You can just look it up in wikipedia. As simple as it is. Please don't state your perceptions as facts. peace.
@chefzand66074 жыл бұрын
I visited Nairobi back in 2018 and it seemed like there was a lot of Chinese influence and investment in Eastern Africa
@taitai54624 жыл бұрын
Do you know what I never should expect to see on headlines “ Saudi Arabia and Israel team up against Iran”
@guppy7192 жыл бұрын
Shia verse Sunni
@KommentarSpaltenKrieger4 жыл бұрын
It is almost like you are mixing up two different tendencies and are displaying them as the same thing. One trend is an increase in smaller and smaller nations; another one is an increase in federations and country unions. Both are, as I would say, the exact opposite of one another.
@ItalianIrishguy4 жыл бұрын
The East African Federation is a terrible idea and joining any African nations together would be a disaster. Africa needs more countries, not less. The E.F.E. also doomed it's changes but adding on civil war stricken South Sudan into the fold. It will never happen and rightfully so. Congo for example has the problems it does because of the massive ethnic divides in the country and needs to break up. Yugoslavia like you mentioned is a good reminder of why joining countries together is a bad idea.
@theshawshankinception12203 жыл бұрын
Australia is a Continent. Oceania is a geographic region. Australia is a continent.
@Mattis063 жыл бұрын
Decolonization makes me happy and sad
@paranoidrodent4 жыл бұрын
As a Canadian who watches and reads both French and English media and has no dog in the race, I can safely say that the British obsession with slagging France and seeing it as a rival isn't really mutual and hasn't been aside from the Anglo-Norman period and parts of the colonial era. British media (including KZbinrs) constantly slag the French while French media ignores the UK for the most part. It's glaringly one-sided and the only ones who seem to think this rivalry exists are Brits. The whole thing is so weird when viewing both sides. The French distrust the British (the perfidious Albion trope) but they spent long centuries focused on German-speaking powers (Austria, Prussia and especially the unified Germany). Britain was a threat to colonial possessions but it alone hasn't been a threat to mainland France since the 14th century. The Germans have been viewed as France's real concern for centuries. Today, you'll hear French political types and media bemoan Anglo-Saxon influence on culture and the world stage and such but they really mean the broader English speaking world and especially the United States. It's Hollywood and Washington, not charming little Brit shows or a sudden wave of tea-drinking, that they're talking about. Despite that, their core foreign policy for over 150 years has been obsessed with containing Germany, these days by keeping them in a strong alliance. The Germans are by far more important to them. The French aren't terribly focused on the UK and the stereotype of the Brits is mostly of boring, tradition-bound, stuffy yet insufferably contrarian people with awful cooking. In short, the French think the Brits are dull. I have never heard a French comedian ever bother to make a joke about the UK outside of Brexit (the Belgians, sure, Italians and plenty of others but never Brits) but British TV, film and even KZbin rarely resists a jab at the French (even the Germans get less grief). It's a bit like how Canadian comment on the US a lot but Americans just think Canada's kind of dull.
@rangerbobox19152 жыл бұрын
Some part of me thinks that ibx is just doing this on his own and that someone else is secretly recording these and uploading them to this channel.
@caligula25294 жыл бұрын
TIto is pronounced Teeto, not Tyto
@clashcookie7214 жыл бұрын
Serbian People: Why is Cosovo not on this list?
@heidi79054 жыл бұрын
der Führer maybe gonna be independent
@TankMarko4 жыл бұрын
@Tomáš Staněk no it isn't
@scepan51554 жыл бұрын
@Tomáš Staněk It's recognition is decreasing. And they are not part of any international unions or alliances such as UN or Interpol and never be unless Serbia recognizes them or makes some kind of a deal.
@petarmalovic76243 жыл бұрын
@Tomáš Staněk There is UN Resolution 1244 which tells that kosovo is a part of Serbia
@MasterFalkner4 жыл бұрын
i'm of the belief that if decolonization never happened from 1900 to the present there would only be 13 countries right now. 1. British Empire 2. Dutch Empire 3. French Empire 4. German Empire 5. Iberian Union 6. Scandinavian Empire 7. Ottoman Empire 8. Persian Empire 9. Soviet Union 10. American Empire 11. Chinese Empire 12. Japanese Empire 13. South Korea (with North Korea being apart of the Soviet Union or China)
@BasicLib3 жыл бұрын
You either missed or recolonised way too many countries
@bigchungis90004 жыл бұрын
Craig
@duckyshitatmc7103 Жыл бұрын
closest thing to a french-british union is brittany n normandy splitting fron france and joining the uk
@SanLeMans2 жыл бұрын
21:00 as a french guy who grew up with both (didnt grow up in france) When I was younger I was like "why even french, english is way better and useful", now as an 18yo guy and quite patriotic, yeah it does hurt ;-;, french is still very famous and very useful but yknow- But as french citizen it is my duty to make sure my language and its culture spread and grows. Puis merde, j'ai réalisé que le français et en effet meilleur pour de multiple raison.
@SanLeMans2 жыл бұрын
Stupidity is like jam, the less you have the more you spread of it. Un peut comme l'anglais en vrais mdr.
@kazakhdude3 жыл бұрын
If Australia was a continent then its states will be the countries.
@CommanderOfChicken4 жыл бұрын
0:07 fond memories of playing Malaysia on the NES.
@ScyllaCinema3 жыл бұрын
quebec would have been a much better example than california
@jaqwezyy49054 жыл бұрын
37th
@RolfanWYSI2 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or does ToyCat look like a british anime protaganist
@themisterceapa18714 жыл бұрын
Romania was not "basically a puppet state" of the soviet union. A split occured mainly due to ceausescu's ideology of national communism (a weird mix of nationalism and communism). Quoted wikipedia below in case anyone wants to read into it "After coming under communist control in 1948, Romania was closely aligned with the international policies and goals of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. But after mid-1952, when Gheorghiu-Dej had gained full control of the party and had become head of state, Romania began a slow disengagement from Kremlin domination, being careful not to incur the suspicions or disapproval of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin. Soviet troops left Romania in 1958, no Warsaw Pact troops were allowed on Romanian territory after 1962, and Romanian forces essentially quit participating in joint Warsaw Pact field exercises in the late 1960s. At the same time, Ceausescu announced that Romania would no longer put its military forces under the Warsaw Pact's joint command, even during peacetime maneuvers. By that period, the Soviet Union and Romania established SovRoms, which were the new tax-exempt Soviet-Romanian economic corporations that helped the reconstruction of Romania until they were dismantled in 1956: albeit, some lasted until 1975 with the main focus to assure Soviet access to resources like Uranium. In 1976 Ceausescu received Leonid Brezhnev in Bucharest-the first official visit by a Soviet leader since 1955. The final communique of the meeting reflected continuing disagreements between the two countries, as Romania refused to side with the Soviets in their dispute with China. In 1978, after visiting China, Ceausescu attended a Warsaw Pact summit meeting in Moscow, where he rejected a Soviet proposal that member countries increase their military expenditures. On his return to Bucharest, Ceausescu explained the refusal by stating that any increase in military expenditure was contrary to the socialist countries' effort to reduce military tensions in Europe.[13] Perhaps because of Ceausescu's uncooperative attitude, a 1980 Romanian attempt to secure supplies of energy and raw materials from the Soviet Union and other Comecon countries failed when those countries demanded world market prices and payment in hard currency. Nor would the Soviet Union guarantee that it would increase or even maintain existing levels of oil exports to Romania for the following year. Dumitru Prunariu and Leonid Popov with Leonid Brezhnev in 1981 The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan caused Romania to distance itself further from Brezhnev. When the UN General Assembly voted on a resolution calling for the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of Soviet troops, Romania broke with its Warsaw Pact allies and abstained. And one month later, at a meeting of communist states in Sofia, Romania joined the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) in refusing to endorse the invasion.[13] During Yuri Andropov's brief tenure as Soviet leader, relations remained frigid. The wording of the communique following a meeting with Ceausescu in Moscow suggested that Andropov intended to pressure Romania to bring its foreign policy into line with the Warsaw Pact. The Romanian leadership appeared to suspect Andropov of pro-Hungarian sympathies because of his close personal friendship with First Secretary János Kádár of Hungary. Romanian disagreements with the Soviet position on intermediate nuclear forces in Europe also surfaced during the Andropov period. "
@annymous-bz2xx4 жыл бұрын
Onion Guy shut up
@saulenfischbearn74704 жыл бұрын
Did anybody notice, that a part of his pullover was transparent? xd
@friendlyoldpieceofapoppedp7114 жыл бұрын
Säulenfisch [Bearn] it’s called a green screen
@saulenfischbearn74704 жыл бұрын
@@friendlyoldpieceofapoppedp711 I know, what a green screen is and that the piece of his pullover I was talking about is in reality green. So yeah...
@friendlyoldpieceofapoppedp7114 жыл бұрын
Säulenfisch [Bearn] ok
@SomasAcademy4 жыл бұрын
~17:25 Australia technically IS a continent, though the continent of Australia includes the country of Australia, the Island of New Guinea, and the islands in between, not just the country. Oceania is not a continent, but is rather a geographic region which includes the continent of Australia and a number of surrounding islands. I know, stupid, but that's the way we officially break things down in the Anglosphere.
@tealkerberus7484 жыл бұрын
Soma Hanikeri the continental plate of Australia also includes India. But I don't think that stops us being a continent in our own right. There's a lot of sea bed between us and them!
@SomasAcademy4 жыл бұрын
@@tealkerberus748 Actually India is on its own plate. The Australian plate only includes Australia, New Guinea, the north island and part of the South Island of New Zealand, and the smaller islands in between those landmasses. You are right that tectonic plates don't define continents, though; Europe and Asia are considered different continents, but they mostly share a plate, and India and Arabia are each on their own plates, but are considered part of Asia.
@JennaGetsCreative4 жыл бұрын
Yes, actually, we do want to talk more about the UK's status in Europe! Lol.
@tealmer35284 жыл бұрын
7:04 a 50/50? Nope.
@jpaior4 жыл бұрын
Bow ghan ville
@cartoonsforall64694 жыл бұрын
Toycat: there is 190 2,4,6,8 countries UN’s 193:Am I a joke to you
@aaronpowell98913 жыл бұрын
*Vatican city left the chat
@SonOfMuta3 жыл бұрын
My dude said "look at Hong Kong" when talking about future independent nations 🤣
@bvd_vlvd3 жыл бұрын
It's evolving, just backwards
@Accountfrfr3 жыл бұрын
When south sudan leaves Sudan and then tries to join a new nation XD
@phwaedih4 жыл бұрын
1:00 One Hundred and Ninety... 2 4 6 8 who do we appreciate? *toycat*
@nathanwinter8633 жыл бұрын
Would be cool to see another video like that
@realmless41934 жыл бұрын
Who watches toycat 2 more than toycat 1 like me?
@FannomacritaireSuomi2 жыл бұрын
Scotland and Catalonia should exist. End of discussion. They bring so much more cultural and linguistic diversity to Europe.
@Nick_the_antzzzz2 жыл бұрын
If that happened Wales would follow close behind
@rustyshackleford234 Жыл бұрын
Yeah sure make Europe’s boarders even more confusing.
@tealkerberus7484 жыл бұрын
Bougainville is am "oe" sound, not an "oo" sound.
@BeardedSkunk4 жыл бұрын
Lingua Franca es Latina no Franca
@btg77604 жыл бұрын
Imagine all the slavs in one country and all the Germans in one country and all of them had this massive war
@compatriot8523 жыл бұрын
The confederates were actually very close at times to winning the war While the union had a larger military (not better), most of their troops were poorly trained and equiped to deal with Southern terrain with many northerners getting ill from the intense heat, disease, etc. They also had an issue with multiple incompetent generals. The South on the other hand had a smaller, but more skilled army with top tier generals like Lee, who singlehandedly turned many battles.
@angryyordle46404 жыл бұрын
Everybody in western europe mocks the french, but is secretly buddies with them. Not just the UK.
@angryyordle46404 жыл бұрын
Oh god, if Bougainville becomes independent that means chaos for Papua New Guinea. The rest of the land is extremely poor and Bougainville used to be responsible for a lot of the economy.
@dawidblachowski4 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about Republic of Upper Silesia, that almost come to existence in 1918