In Bhavishya Purana 50% of Prophesy is not Fulfilled by Muhammad (p). Thus he Cannot be a Prophet

Nilima Asks Dr Zakir, “In Bhavishya Purana 50% of the Prophesy is not Fulfilled by Muhammad (pbuh). Thus he Cannot be a Prophet.” - Dr Zakir Naik
MVWRSQA-3
Questioner: Good evening sir. I am a lecturer by profession and also a research scholar in Islam and comparative studies.
Manzoor Shaikh: May I know your name please?
Questioner: I’m Nilima. I respect your great enlightenment sir but I have a small clarification to be made, like, let us just go back to the Bhavishiya Purana Part 3, khand 3, Adhya 3 and Shlokas 5 to 8. Before going to this I would just like to mention that, may be you already know, because every Prophet who comes in the name of God will fulfill the Prophesy which is made for him. So any Prophet who fulfills 50% of that Prophesy is not qualified to be a Prophet. I mean this is a simple logical thing. So now coming back to the Bhavishya Purana you talked about the Malachia leader saying that he is none other than Muhammad, okay. Now I accept the first half of the thing of the Shoka you said but the second 50% which is still ignored. Now sir let me tell you Malachia, the word meaning Malachia it is derived from Sanskrit dictionary I mean the meaning and the meaning means Non Aryan or sinner or wicked person. These are the three different meanings given to the word Malachia. So according to this can Muhammad be a sinner or a wicked person?
The second part is, the second Prophesy is that he will belong to Marustal and in Sanskrit, land of death, because Maru in, I mean, it is derived from Sanskritic Mru. Mru is death. And defiantly it does not quoting to the land of Arabia because it is a barren land or it is a battle field.
And next, coming to the third point of it, this Prophesy also mentions that, that Malachia, leader, will take bath in Panchgavya and in river Ganges. It is a common truth we know that, Ganges means Ganga River. And we all know that Ganga is not in Arabia but it is in India. It is a universal fact. And coming to the taking bath in Panchgavya, the meaning of Panchgavya is 5 products of cow. And the products of cow is milk, curds, ghee, urine, cow dung.
And now sir coming to this part exclusively this Prophesy has been fulfilled by Muhammad where in if you show me at least single reference from Quran where in Muhammad has taken bath in either in all these 5 products i.e. milk, curds, ghee, urine and cow dung. I am ready to accept Islam today. Thank you, sir.
Dr. Zakir: Sister has rightly said that if the Prophesy that you gave if more than 50% is not fulfilled then the Prophesy is wrong. I agree with you sister, I agree with you. And I will answer all your three queries. Lets see whether you accept Islam or not today. That’s a different thing that you may not agree with the truth I will speak to you. I agree with you Malachya I agree with you, all your three definitions. Malachiya, one of the meaning is Non Aryan meaning a foreigner, one of the meaning is sinner, one is a wicked person. That’s the reason alike the Hindus they call the Muslims as Malachia. When they say that they mean actually wicked and sinner. But the other meaning is also foreigner. As far as when I speak when I quote from any scripture while quoting and while taking the meaning its not necessary that if the word has got 4 meanings then more than 2 meanings should be correct. Even if one is correct, the meaning is right...
#Nilima #Asks #DrZakir #Bhavishya #Purana #50% #Prophesy #Fulfilled #Muhammad #pbuh #Thus #Cannot #be #Prophet #Zakir #Naik #Zakirnaik #Drzakirnaik #Fariq #Naik #FariqNaik #FariqZakirNaik #Dr #Drzakirchannel #Allah #Allaah #God #Muslim #Islam #Islaam #Comparative #Religion #ComparativeReligion #Atheism #Atheist #Christianity #Christian #Hinduism #Hindu #Buddhism #Buddhist #Judaism #Jew #Sikhism #Sikh #Jainism #Jain #Lecture #Question #Answer #QuestionsandAnswer #Logic #Reason #Science #Misconception #Misunderstanding #PeaceTV #Dawah #Muhammad #Mohammed #Hadeeth #Hadith #Saheeh #Sahih #Man #Woman #Human #Humanity #Problem #Solution #Rights #Media #War #Peace #Similarities #Debate #Lecture #Quran #Quraan #AlQuran #AlQuraan #Bible #Veda #Gita #Geeta #Baghwat #Upanishad #Purana #Terrorism #Terrorist #Universal #Brotherhood #Word #Purpose #Life #Jihad #Jihaad #Jesus #Christ #Jesuschrist #Church #Mosque #Masjid #Perspective #Ask #AskDrZakir #Seeking #Knowledge #Education #NonMuslim #Fundamentalist #Fundamentalism #Symposium #Dialogue #Salaah #Salah #Shariah #Scripture #Ahmed #Deedat #AhmedDeedat #Daee #Missionary #Concept #West #Family #Global #Ramadhaan #Ramadan #Tauheed #Tawheed #Monotheism #Zakaat #Zakat #Zakah #Hajj #Saum #Fasting #Makkah #Mecca #Madinah #India #Malaysia #Ummah #Unity #Importance #Date #Isamophobia #Understand #Deen #Fardh #Fard #Haraam #Haram #Sunnah #Mustahab #Waajib #Wajib #Compulsory #Prohibited #Encouraged #Permissible #Permitted #Prohibited #Sin #Sinful #Heaven #Hell #Hellfire #Jannah #Jahannum #Paradise

[@nazneenabbas9119]

Alhamdulillah, Zakir sir may Allah swt bless you with health wealth happiness &long life & protect you from enemies.

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@dhananjayjajoo6753]

Saala harami Zakir Nayak

[@rishipatel9508]

Lawda lega

[@themuhammedkhan]

We don't have any enemy including zakir naik

[@abdulwahabazhar9646]

Ameen

[@almamunwodud]

Dr. Zakir Naik is the most intelligent scholar in comparative religion after Late Ahmed Deedat. May Allah bless him always and protect him from enemies of peace.

[@muhammadmomin3913]

Aameen 🤲🏻🙏🏻

[@alieujatta5776]

Aameen

[@2niner77]

Naik makes 25 mistakes in 5 minutes and you call him intelligent? You make good joke with me.

[@tarihitv2617]

Ameen

[@abusuheyba]

Amiin

[@fahadjawad9137]

I just want to add one thing that if the girl is trying to give wrong meanings to the words used in the book she believes in then she is saying that the book is foretelling about a wrong person. If book is foretelling about a otaar then that person should be a masoom rather than wicked because it will then put the book in suspision.

[@MATTHEWProvesJesusDidNotDieFor]

Why are the Christians Celebrating Jesus dying For their $ins 🕺😊🕺😊🕺😊🕺😊🕺 How did the Christians benefit from Jesus' Sacrifice if they still must repent & why did God forgive people without the need of human sacrifice in the past ❓ 🤔

[@princeahmad70]

Of course bro..that's it..

[@user-xh1xb3qe2q]

@@MATTHEWProvesJesusDidNotDieFor Bruh 🤫. .. you're offending them. Plz don't spark a comment war 🤣. Why are they used a ❌ ... A sign for the wrong and a device of torture ... As their symbol.... Ups sorry

[@MATTHEWProvesJesusDidNotDieFor]

@Knowledge Explosion JazakAllah

[@PEH5806]

Yes u r correct

[@cure4islamophobia649]

BIBLE AS GOD'S WORD ❓ Can God be the author of confusion and contradiction? i) I John 5:7 which hinted at the Trinity is taken out of every modern version of the Bible as it is not to be found in the most ancient manuscripts (that they have access to today). There is therefore no longer any verse in the Bible which preaches three gods as one. The Koran preaches that God is one indivisible, and not a trinity ( Koran 4:171) ii) II Samuel 24 :1 says that God incited David to number Israel . I Chronicles 21:1 says that Satan incited David to number Israel. God and Satan are not synonymous. iii) II Chronicles 36:9 says that Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he became king. II Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he became king. A difference of 10 years iv) II Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander. I Chronicles 1:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen Contradiction: one says 700 the other 7000. One says 40,000 horsemen(cavalry), the other 40,000 footmen (infantry). v) I Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots. I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses A difference of 36,000. vi) Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons. Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exile Arah having 652 sons. vii) John the Baptist contradicts Jesus. According to Jesus, John the Baptist was Elijah in his 2nd coming Matthew 17:11. John the Baptist denied being Elijah when the priests and Levites questioned him (John 1:19-21). viii) Was Jesus put on a cross (Stauron in Greek) Mark 15:11 or on a tree (Ksulon in Greek) I Peter 2:24 ix) John 3:13 Jesus says that none has ascended into heaven except the son of man who descended from heaven. This contradicts II Kings 2:11 which says that Elijah ascended into heaven. x) Genealogy of Jesus. a) From David to Jesus 41 names (generations) are given by Matthew [although he claims there are 42] as against the 26 names [generations] given by Luke [Luke 3]. A difference of 15 whole generations in the genealogy of the same man. Matthew mentions that Jesus was the seed of David through Solomon while Luke says that Jesus was the seed of David through Nathan [Solomon's brother]. This is a contradiction as the seed of David could never reach Jesus through Solomon and his brother Nathan at the same time. According to Matthew Jesus' grandfather is Jacob [the father of Joseph] while according to Luke it is Heli. xi) Luke doesn't claim inspiration of his Gospel by God. He wrote it because he knew of the events and it "seemed good to him" ( Luke 1:1-5). Also see I Corinthians 7:25 where Paul, in this specific case says that he's informing without God's commandment. II Timothy 3:16 is presented to "prove" that all of the Bible is God's inspiration, the above 2 references apart from the many others disprove that. The point is that the Bible itself doesn't claim to be completely from God (as a whole by name). That is what the Muslim point of view is also. Since God is all- Knowing and isn't the author of confusion, the above references cannot be from God. "How can you say that we are wise and that the law of the Lord is with us but behold, the false pen of the scribe has made it into a lie." Bible. Jeremiah 8:8 "Woe to those who write the Book with their own hands and then say:"This is from God", that they may trade it for some miserable gain. So woe to them for what their hands do write and woe to them for what they gain with it." Koran 2:79 This paper is not intended to be an attack on the Bible but is supposed to be an objective study and is recommended to be used as such. Indeed if similar mistakes were found in the Koran, I would gladly reject it as being God's word based on its own test: "Do they not carefully consider the Koran? If it had been for anyone other than Allah (God), it would contain many contradictions. " (Koran 4:82) May God guide us always closer to the truth. BIBLE PEACE: 20:29-30 The Israelites smite 100,000 Syrian soldiers in one day. A wall falls on 27,000 remaining Syrians . 2KI NGS2:23-24 Forty-two children are mauled and killed, presumably according to the will of God, for having jeered at a man of God. .2KI NGS5:27 Elisha curses Gehazi and his descendants forever with leprosy. .2KINGS 6:29 "So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I said to her, 'Give up your son so we may eat him,' but she had hidden him

[@hasskoramos1972]

The sheikh has more confidence than the answer🥰Allahu akbar

[@Muhammad--kg8yl]

🌻 جزاكم الله خيرا 🌻 💗 اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله واصحابه وسلم عدد خلقك ورضا نفسك وزنة عرشك ومداد كلماتك فى كل وقت وحين 🌷

[@AnthonySmith-hl2pq]

♥️SUBHAN ALLAHI WABI HAMDIHI SUBHAN ALLAH HIL ADEEM♥️

[@wanismailwanyusoff9936]

MashaAllah,Terbaik 👍 lot of love from Kelantan Malaysia 🇲🇾 for Dr Zakir Naik. Very educational.

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@QariAbuAbdullah]

JazaakAllahu khairan

[@lighttheoryllc4337]

In sha ALLAH

[@cure4islamophobia649]

contradictions in the Bible It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. ­­­­­­Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. ­­­­­Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. ­­­­­­ Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. ­­­­­­How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ ­­­­­­Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. ­­­­­ In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. ­­­­­­ Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. ­­­­­­But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. ­­­­­­It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. ­­­­­­In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years.­­­­­­ Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. ­­­­­ It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ ­­­­­­Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? ­­­­­­ Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? ­­­­­­A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ ­­­­­­One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ ­­­­­­Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. ­­­­­­And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. ­­­­­­Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? ­­­­­­ What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? ­­­­­­Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? ­­­­­­Clear-cut contradiction.

[@zainboyko1045]

If there is one type of spam I'd accept its your type brother. Because its nothing but facts. 👍😂

[@muslimboy6174]

الحمدلله رب العلمين الله أكبر May Allah bless all of us

[@hakunamatata6660]

Assalam alykum wa rahmatulahy wa barakatuhu, u have amazing words MashaAllah. May Allah bless u and grant u Al Janatu Al Firdous Amen🌹🌹🌹

[@cure4islamophobia649]

The Prophecies of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ: Proofs of Prophethood “Say, [O Muhammad], ‘I do not tell you that I have the depositories [containing the provision] of Allah nor that I know the unseen, nor do I tell you that I am an angel. I only follow what is revealed to me.’” [al-An‘ām 6: 50] Amidst the fiercest persecution and abuse that the Muslims faced in the earliest Meccan period, the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ would stand without wavering and convey to his followers God’s promise of Islam spreading all over the world. Tamīm ad-Dāri (rA) reports that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, “This matter will certainly reach every place touched by the night and day. Allah will not leave a house of mud or [even] fur except that Allah will cause this religion to enter it, by which the honorable will be honored and the disgraceful will be disgraced. Allah will honor the honorable with Islam and he will disgrace the disgraceful with unbelief.”[3] In another narration, reported by Thawbān (rA), “Indeed, Allah gathered up the earth for me so that I saw its east and its west; and indeed the dominion of my nation will reach what was gathered up for me from it.”[4] The fact that these predictions were made at a time when Muslims were a powerless handful, and Islam was expected to be buried in its cradle, is nothing short of miraculous. At that point, presuming that the faith would even survive would be considered by most nothing short of a pipe-dream. But to predict that Islam would not just survive, but grow to thrive globally, was at that point inconceivable. For us nowadays, witnessing a quarter of this planet’s population as subscribers to Islam makes it clear that this was no presumption, but instead another prophecy inspired by the Divine. The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ foretold a multitude of Muslim conquests, including those of Rome, Persia, Egypt, Yemen, India, and Constantinople. None of these prophecies were described vaguely or with equivocation, but rather with an air of absolute certainty. Jābir b. ‘Abdillāh (rA) reports that while digging the trench outside Madinah to repel an approaching army, a massive boulder obstructed them that no ax would break. With time running out, and with people’s fears and hunger eating away at them, the Prophet ﷺ walked over and picked up the ax. He said, “Bismillah (In God’s name),” and hammered the boulder, reducing a chunk of it to rubble. He said, “Allāhu Akbar (God is Great)! I have been given the keys to Shām; I can see its red palaces at this very moment.” Then he shattered another chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar (God is Great)! I have been given the keys to Persia; I can see Madain’s white palace.” Then he shattered the last chunk and said, “Allāhu Akbar (God is Great)! I have been given the keys to Yemen. By Allah, I can see the Gates of Sana‘a at this very moment from here.”[10] Regarding Egypt, he ﷺ took its conquest for granted, knowing his Lord’s promise was true. Abu Dharr (rA) narrated: The Prophet ﷺ said: “You will certainly conquer Egypt; a land in which [a currency] called al-qīrâṭ is customary. When you conquer it, be gracious to its people, for they are entitled to a covenant and [the right of] family bonds. And when you see two men disputing over the place of a brick, then leave [Egypt].”[11] The Prophet ﷺ accurately spoke in the second person here, foretelling that none other than his personal Companions would conquer Egypt. Then he ﷺ instructed them to honor their peace treaty with the Egyptians and reminded them that their grandmother (Hājar; the mother of Ishmael) was from this land. In this same narration, Abu Dharr (rA) adds, “I witnessed ‘Abdur-Raḥmān b. Shuraḥbīl b. Ḥasana and his brother, Rabī‘a, disputing [in Egypt] over the place of a brick, so I left.” Regarding Constantinople, which is presently called Istanbul, the Prophet ﷺ determined that it would become a Muslim land nearly a millennium prior to that happening. ‘Abdullāh b. ‘Amr (rA) reports that they were once sitting with the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and writing, he ﷺ was asked, “Which city will be liberated first; Constantinople or Rome?” He said, “Indeed, the city of Heraclius will be liberated first,”[12] meaning Constantinople. An entire 800 years later, the Ottoman sultan, Muhammad al-Fātiḥ, accomplished this great feat. In another hadith, “Constantinople will certainly be liberated, and how excellent a leader will its leader be, and how excellent an army that army will be.”[13] Some scholars hold that this second hadith may refer to a second liberation of Constantinople which was also prophesied, but has not yet taken place. Regarding how material prosperity will be a sign of the end-times, the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ said, “And if you see the barefoot, naked, shepherds of camels competing [for praise] in the construction of high-rise buildings, then this is from among the signs [of the Hour].”[46] In a similar hadith about this egotism infesting the mosque atmosphere, he ﷺ said, “The Hour will not commence before people boast of their mosques.” Ibn ‘Abbās (rA), the narrator, added, “You will ornament your mosques just as the Jews and Christians did with their temples.”[47] This intense competition will involve exploitation of others, and thus we find parallel prophecies of hedonism and exploitation in the prophetic tradition as well. In the hadith of Miswar b. Makhrama (rA): “By Allah I do not fear poverty overtaking you, but I fear that you will have abundant wealth at your disposal as it became at the disposal of the nations before you, causing you to compete in it as they competed in it, and then it destroys you as it destroyed them.”[

[@AS-jj4dv]

I know that islam is the correct religion because it says so on the base that the quran is the final truth because this is what is stated in the quran and because it is based on ancient revelations which are reported in the quran which is true because the quran says so on the base that …

[@cure4islamophobia649]

@@AS-jj4dv Islam: The Religion of All Prophets Islam is not a new religion but the final culmination and fulfillment of the same basic truth that ALLAH (God) revealed through all His prophets to every people. As there is only ONE GOD, there is only One Religion. Islam is the preserved pure religion of all prophets sent by ALLAH (GOD). Islam means the complete submission and obedience to Allah (God). Therefore, all prophets were indeed MUSLIMS because they were true submitters to the will of ALLAH, the Creator. "Truly, the religion with Allah (God) is Islam. Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And whoever disbelieves in the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allah, then surely, Allah is Swift in calling to account." [The Noble Quran 3:19] "And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers." [The Noble Quran 3:85] (1) PROPHET ABRAHAM (PEACE BE UPON HIM) WAS MUSLIM "Ibrahim (Abraham) was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a true Muslim Hanifa (Islamic Monotheism - to worship none but Allah Alone) and he was not of Al-Mushrikun (the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, idolaters, polytheists, pagans, etc.)" [The Noble Quran 3:67] "And this (submission to Allah, Islam) was enjoined by Ibrahim (Abraham) upon his sons and by Ya'qub (Jacob)(saying), "O my sons! Allah has chosen for you the (true) religion, then die not except in the Faith of Islâm (as Muslims - Islamic Monotheism)." [The Noble Quran 2:132] (2) PROPHET JOSEPH (PEACE BE UPON HIM) WAS MUSLIM Joseph said: "My Lord! You have indeed bestowed on me of the sovereignty, and taught me something of the interpretation of dreams - the (Only) Creator of the heavens and the earth! You are my Wali (Protector, Helper, Supporter, Guardian, God, Lord) in this world and in the Hereafter. Cause me to die as a Muslim (the one submitting to Your Will), and join me with the righteous." [The Noble Quran 12:101] (3) PROPHET JACOB AND HIS SONS WERE MUSLIMS "Or were you witnesses when death approached Ya'qub (Jacob)? When he said unto his sons, "What will you worship after me?" They said, "We shall worship your Ilah (God - Allah), the Ilah (God) of your fathers, Ibrahim (Abraham), Isma'il (Ishmael), Ishaq (Isaac), One Ilah (God), and to Him we submit (in Islam, Muslims)." [The Noble Quran 2:133] (4) PROPHET JESUS (PEACE BE UPON HIM) AND HIS DISCIPLES WERE MUSLIMS "Then when 'Isa (Jesus) came to know of their disbelief, he said: "Who will be my helpers in Allah's Cause?" Al-Hawariun (the disciples) said: "We are the helpers of Allah; we believe in Allah, and bear witness that we are Muslims (i.e. we submit to Allah)." [The Noble Quran 3:52] "And when I (Allah) revealed to Al-Hawarieen (the disciples)(of 'Isa (Jesus)) to believe in Me and My Messenger, they said: "We believe. And bear witness that we are Muslims." [The Noble Quran 5:111]. ALLAH (GOD) ALMIGHTY SAYS IN THE NOBLE QURAN: "[18] Nay, We (Allah) fling (send down) the truth (this Quran) against the falsehood (disbelief), so it destroys it, and behold, it (falsehood) is vanished. And woe to you for that (lie) which you ascribe (to Allah by uttering that Allah has a son)." "[19] To Him belongs whosoever is in the heavens and on earth. And those who are near Him (i.e. the angels) are not too proud to worship Him, nor are they weary (of His worship)." [The Noble Quran 21:18-19]

[@AS-jj4dv]

@@cure4islamophobia649 What complete nonsense! You only want to ensure the religious imperialism of islam. That's why the quaran copy and paste the bible and the thora. Religion is a question of power, power and control of people for the benefit of the religious leaders and sometimes governments.

[@3ShinesTV]

Bahut shukriya💞💞💞🙏🙏🙏

[@sameeribnahmed3471]

Glory be to God💖

[@cure4islamophobia649]

Concept of God in Islam Monotheism, belief in one God, is the most important and foundational concept in Islam. Muslims believe in one God who created the universe and has power over everything within it. He is unique and exalted above everything He creates, and His greatness cannot be compared to His creation. Furthermore, He is the only one deserving of any worship and the ultimate purpose of all creation is to submit to Him. The Islamic understanding of God is distinct from all other religions and beliefs in various respects since it is based on a pure and clear understanding of monotheism. This essentially captures the concept of God in Islam, which will be further elaborated in this pamphlet. Muslims often refer to God as Allah. This is a universal name for God and does not refer to an exclusively ‘Islamic’ God. Interestingly, this name is related to the Aramaic and Hebrew names for God, Allaha and Elohim. Therefore, Allah is simply the Arabic name for God which affirms that He is One singular God with no partners or equals. The name Allah cannot be pluralized or limited to a specific gender, which establishes that God is One and that He is unique from everything He creates. Muslims continue to use this original Arabic name for God (Allah) since it perfectly expresses His unique qualities. God is the Creator and the Sustainer of the universe who created everything for a reason. Muslims believe that He created humankind with a simple purpose - to worship Him. He sent messengers to guide people in fulfilling this purpose. Some of these messengers include Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, peace be upon all of them. They all taught a consistent message about God by affirming His greatness as the Creator and guiding people to worship Him alone. This basic concept has always resonated with people’s natural understanding of God. (Click here to learn more about prophets in Islam.) When the final prophet, Muhammad, peace be upon him (pbuh), was asked about God, the answer came directly from God in the holy book of Muslims, the Quran (also spelled ‘Koran’): “Say, ‘He is God the One, God the eternal. He begot no one nor was He begotten. No one is comparable to Him.’” [112:1-4] This is a clear statement by God describing Himself to humanity without any room for confusion. God is One and is exalted above everything He creates and He is capable over all things. Fully accepting the oneness of God is to accept that He is distinct from everything else. It would not suit God’s majesty and glory to associate the limited attributes of His creation to Him because He is not restricted in any way, while His creation is. He is the First with no beginning and the Last with no end. Everything in the universe was created by His will. He is not confined by space or time and He is the only One who is in control and provides for His creation. “He is God: there is no god other than Him. It is He who knows what is hidden as well as what is in the open, He is the Lord of Mercy, the Giver of Mercy. He is God: there is no god other than Him, the Controller, the Holy One, Source of Peace, Granter of Security, Guardian over all, the Almighty, the Compeller, the Truly Great; God is far above anything they consider to be His partner. He is God: the Creator, the Originator, the Shaper. The best names belong to Him. Everything in the heavens and earth glorifies Him: He is the Almighty, the Wise.” [Quran, 59:22-24] Why did God create people whom He already knew would reject Him and go to hell? Shouldn’t God who is All Loving instead not create them so that they won’t go through punishment? These are some common questions connected to this topic. Answered by Nouman Ali Khan Pure Monotheism “God: there is no god but Him, the Ever Living, the Ever Watchful. Neither slumber nor sleep overtakes Him. All that is in the heavens and in the earth belongs to Him. Who is there that can intercede with Him except by His leave? He knows what is before them and what is behind them, but they do not comprehend any of His knowledge except what He wills. His throne extends over the heavens and the earth; it does not weary Him to preserve them both. He is the Most High, the Tremendous.” [Quran, 2:255] The primary pillar of Islamic belief clearly states that there is nothing worthy of worship except God. Associating partners with God or attributing qualities of lesser beings to Him is considered to be the greatest sin in Islam. In the past, this often took the form of idol worship or praying to multiple lesser gods. Although this is less common now, the current era has replaced many of the physical ‘idols’ of the past with other contemporary ‘gods.’ Many people today allow passions like entertainment, drugs, relationships or material objects to become the center of their lives. They become so consumed with these things that they submit to whatever will allow them to fulfill their desires. For example, if a drug addict allows their addiction to control their actions, beliefs, feelings, and behaviors, causing them to risk their personal safety and the safety of others, that drug has essentially become their god. Likewise, if another person puts a loved one before God by obeying that person even if that causes them to transgress against God’s commands, their loved one has taken precedence over God. Islam teaches that people should completely submit only to God as He is the only One worthy of their worship. He is the Creator and Sustainer of the universe and everything in it belongs to Him. The Quran points out the faulty thinking of those who worship other than God: “‘How can you worship things you carve with your own hands, when it is God who has created you and all your handiwork?’” [37:95-96]

[@faizalamsahib8040]

Allah o Akbar Jazak-Allah

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@gazzaliibrahimbdoka9280]

MASHA ALLAH

[@norazilah8255]

Allahu Akhbar....

[@sakeenaashraf3521]

Masha Allah

[@OpenmindedThinkerShow]

another great exposition. from my study, Islam appears the fulfilment of the scriptures. CHRISTIAN OR JEWISH

[@swagmalone8092]

You have my respect to even accept this as a point.

[@adminscamp2563]

Oh it's yiu

[@henrylow2248]

A true prophet is one who brings the message of all-inclusive love from God to all mankind. This is the test for a any person to be considered a prophet.

[@melaniecasey4030]

Beautiful lecturer

[@ALzzanam]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@ibrakhimkalmykov3625]

Don’t shorten salawat say and write in fullﷺ

[@mudassirabubakar2491]

Allah bless you Dr Zakir naik

[@ae-rr3ek]

سبحان الله والحمد لله ولا إله إلا الله والله أكبر

[@agungsetiawan2926]

Subahanallah.

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls sister 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, Sister it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@cure4islamophobia649]

Quranic Teachings about Satan and about Morality Some claim that the Quran was the work of the devil.[1] Let us examine how much sense (or non-sense) this allegation makes. If he authored or inspired the Quran, why would Satan curse himself and call himself the worst enemy of man (Q.35:6; 36:60)? Why would Satan command that before reciting the Quran, one must first say: “…I seek refuge in God from Satan the accursed.” (Quran 16:98) How could Satan so vehemently condemn himself? Is it really acceptable to common sense to hold the view that Satan would ask people to do good, to be moral and virtuous, to worship none but God, to not follow Satan or his whispers, and to avoid and struggle against evil? To hold such a view is clearly repugnant to reason, as Satan has only undermined himself through this means if he is the author. Even the Bible attests: “And if Satan has risen up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand, but is coming to an end.” (Mark 3:26)[2] This argument applies to any “Satanic forces”, be they “evil spirits”, “deceitful aliens”, etc

[@farahsali1]

Subhan Allah May Allah reward you brother. I love all the points you have put forward and so well explained. Jazak Allah khair

[@niyajulansary6664]

Mashallah

[@muhammadshahriarislam3201]

Us SalamuAlaikum, Where can I get the full lecture?

[@cure4islamophobia649]

Islam: The Religion of All Prophets Islam is not a new religion but the final culmination and fulfillment of the same basic truth that ALLAH (God) revealed through all His prophets to every people. As there is only ONE GOD, there is only One Religion. Islam is the preserved pure religion of all prophets sent by ALLAH (GOD). Islam means the complete submission and obedience to Allah (God). Therefore, all prophets were indeed MUSLIMS because they were true submitters to the will of ALLAH, the Creator. "Truly, the religion with Allah (God) is Islam. Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And whoever disbelieves in the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allah, then surely, Allah is Swift in calling to account." [The Noble Quran 3:19] "And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers." [The Noble Quran 3:85] (1) PROPHET ABRAHAM (PEACE BE UPON HIM) WAS MUSLIM "Ibrahim (Abraham) was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a true Muslim Hanifa (Islamic Monotheism - to worship none but Allah Alone) and he was not of Al-Mushrikun (the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, idolaters, polytheists, pagans, etc.)" [The Noble Quran 3:67] "And this (submission to Allah, Islam) was enjoined by Ibrahim (Abraham) upon his sons and by Ya'qub (Jacob)(saying), "O my sons! Allah has chosen for you the (true) religion, then die not except in the Faith of Islâm (as Muslims - Islamic Monotheism)." [The Noble Quran 2:132] (2) PROPHET JOSEPH (PEACE BE UPON HIM) WAS MUSLIM Joseph said: "My Lord! You have indeed bestowed on me of the sovereignty, and taught me something of the interpretation of dreams - the (Only) Creator of the heavens and the earth! You are my Wali (Protector, Helper, Supporter, Guardian, God, Lord) in this world and in the Hereafter. Cause me to die as a Muslim (the one submitting to Your Will), and join me with the righteous." [The Noble Quran 12:101] (3) PROPHET JACOB AND HIS SONS WERE MUSLIMS "Or were you witnesses when death approached Ya'qub (Jacob)? When he said unto his sons, "What will you worship after me?" They said, "We shall worship your Ilah (God - Allah), the Ilah (God) of your fathers, Ibrahim (Abraham), Isma'il (Ishmael), Ishaq (Isaac), One Ilah (God), and to Him we submit (in Islam, Muslims)." [The Noble Quran 2:133] (4) PROPHET JESUS (PEACE BE UPON HIM) AND HIS DISCIPLES WERE MUSLIMS "Then when 'Isa (Jesus) came to know of their disbelief, he said: "Who will be my helpers in Allah's Cause?" Al-Hawariun (the disciples) said: "We are the helpers of Allah; we believe in Allah, and bear witness that we are Muslims (i.e. we submit to Allah)." [The Noble Quran 3:52] "And when I (Allah) revealed to Al-Hawarieen (the disciples)(of 'Isa (Jesus)) to believe in Me and My Messenger, they said: "We believe. And bear witness that we are Muslims." [The Noble Quran 5:111]. ALLAH (GOD) ALMIGHTY SAYS IN THE NOBLE QURAN: "[18] Nay, We (Allah) fling (send down) the truth (this Quran) against the falsehood (disbelief), so it destroys it, and behold, it (falsehood) is vanished. And woe to you for that (lie) which you ascribe (to Allah by uttering that Allah has a son)." "[19] To Him belongs whosoever is in the heavens and on earth. And those who are near Him (i.e. the angels) are not too proud to worship Him, nor are they weary (of His worship)." [The Noble Quran 21:18-19]

[@irwan3064]

Islam is a new faith.There was no Islam, mosques or Kabah before Messenger MuhammadSAW. *Al'* mighty God SWT existed before this World.He was Creator of Heavens and Earth and all living things ...

[@cure4islamophobia649]

@@irwan3064 how do you know Islam did not exist before this world

[@IBRACHE]

LA ILAHA ILLALAH

[@FahadIbnIbrahim]

Alhamdulillah

[@mohammedhisham9107]

Subahanallaha

[@jsmsekh5900]

Masallah, exactly right

[@ahldee4861]

Alhamdulillah allah mahabassar thanks........

[@cure4islamophobia649]

Finding and Following Jesus: The Muslim Claim to the Messiah Jesus was “God’s word conveyed to Mary and a spirit from him” (Qur’an 4:171) but he remained only the son of Mary (Qur’an 5:110), not of God. The Qur’an understands literally the notion of a son and therefore rejects a consort for God (Qur’an 6:101; 72:3) who has no son, only honored servants (Qur’an 21:26). There are no saviors, only prophets who warn. Nor are there any intercessors-unless God wills otherwise. He alone has the power to forgive sins and to answer His creatures’ prayers for help and guidance.Yesous Yeshu‘a, rendered ‘Joshua’ in English. The Hebrew original contains the idea of being a savior. ‘Isa has no meaning in Arabic or in Hebrew and its use might startle Christians since they expect Yeshu‘a or Yesu‘a to be the relevant Arabic transliteration. God made Jesus and his mother ayah) for humanity, a mercy (rahmah) from God, his miraculous birth “a matter foreordained” (Qur’an 19:21). Muslims proclaim Jesus as a sign of God (ayatu Allah) for all humanity (Qur’an 19:21) but not a (or the) son of God. The Qur’an also calls Muhammaﷺrahmah to all the worlds (21:107) and eulogizes the Word of God as a mercy and healing for believers (17:82; 41:44). The Greek Christos (anointed one) is a translation of the Hebrew meshiakh, meaning someone selected for a sacred role or special honor. It can refer to any chosen or regal personage. Al-Masih is probably an Arabic transliteration of the Hebrew. But what does al-Masih mean or intend in the Qur’an? The Arabic verb ma/sa/ha, like its virtually identical Hebrew cognate, means to rub lightly with water or oil; formal washings before Muslim ritual prayers require this light touch or anointment with water (Qur’an 5:6). The Qur’an’s description of Jesuعليهالسلامal-Masih ‘Isa ibn Maryam (3:45). In Judaism, ‘the Christ’ functions as an indefinite description since the identity of the true claimant must be distinguished from false pretenders. The referent of the phrase remains disputed: Jews are still waiting for the messiah. In first-century Palestine, the messiah’s lineage and identity were topics of fierce sectarian dispute. The self-segregated Qumran community expected two messiahs, one royal (of Davidic descent) and one priestly. In prophecy, an indefinite description is made partly definite; a proper name may or may not supplement the title. Thus, “His name is Ahmad” (Qur’an 61:6) can function as an attributive adjectival appellation or merely a proper (nominal or content-less) name while “His name is John” ( Yahya; Qur’an 19:7) simply introduces a proper name. The Qur’an denies the crucifixion (4:157), a fact that further defines the Messiah. God would not permit such a one to die a shameful death. In later Muslim piety, Jesu was ‘translated,’ a technical Christian term for describing ascent into heaven, without the normal precondition of bodily death. Allah exalted Jesus to himself. The Qur’an’s denial of Jesus’ crucifixion obviates the need for his resurrection but the Islamic scripture attests to Jesus’ ascension, understood as his miraculous entry into heaven through God’s direct intervention (see Qur’an 3:55; 4:157-8; 5:116-117). Only Luke mentions the Ascension of the risen Christ (24:50-51) after his resurrection and adds in Acts (1:1-3) that this event took place forty days after his resurrection. (Mark 16:19 mentions it too but this passage is absent from the most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses.) IV. The New Testament Jesus in the Light of the Qur’an The New Testament writers considered Jesus to be the messianic descendant of King David . For Christians, Jesus’ humiliating death was simply a fulfillment of divine prophecy: he was innocent of the accusations made against him by the establishment. While claiming that Muhammad’s advent was promised in antecedent scripture, the Qur’an never calls Jesus the promised messiah. This may be because the Qur’an recognizes at best only the Torah (Pentateuch of Moses) as scripture. For Jews, the Masoretic text of the Hebrew Bible, what Christians effectively dismiss as the ‘Old’ Testament, has three levels of holiness. After the Torah, the prophetic oracles quoting direct divine speech form the second holiest portion, the Nebi’im (Prophets) division. The messianic prophecies are concentrated here but, as in the third portion, the Ketub’im (Writings), much of this prophetic material is humanly composed and has been partly corrupted in transmission and through unauthorized scribal amplification. al-Injil) to confirm the Torah (al-Taurah). The Qur’an reveals that the Gospel vouchsafed to Jesus was a relaxed version of the Torah (Qur’an 3:50). Some laws imposed on the Children of Israel seemed prejudicially rigorous but, the Qur’an explains, these laws were intended to be conspicuously rigorous-as a just punishment for their specific iniquities and persistent delinquencies (Qur’an 6:146). However, the Qur’an does not suggest that the Gospel was a law-free version of the Torah or in some way legally or morally superior to it. The Qur’an concurs with the sum verdict of Matthew’s gospel: Jesu Abba (heavenly Father) scandalized his Pharisee critics. The Jesus of the Qur’an enjoys a close relationship with God, despite not addressing him as Father. So long as the believer does not obliterate his or her identity but remains distinct from God, Islam salutes the closeness of such mystical piety. The Qur’an speaks of the signs of God in nature and human nature (3:190; 30:20-25). John’s gospel, too, sees the actions of Jesu In the Qur’an and the Prophet’s canonical sayings, al-Masih is the Lord’s anointed, an accolade conferred uniquely on Jesus Islam pays special tribute to Jesus but not in a way that would satisfy the highly ambitious credal and ecclesial requirements of orthodox Christology. For Christians, the Muslim Jesus is a dull, predictable figure, a mere prophet, of whom there are legion in the Bible and the Qur’an. He would resemble the harmless figure of the cultural Jesus whose message can entertain kids at Christmas and Easter. This may sound like a caricature or parody of the Qur’anic Jesus but the Christian point is that only the adult version is the real Jesus, the incarnate God who suffered on a cross to secure redemption for sinful Adam and all his descendants. The Islamic Jesus appears as the real Jesus but minus the distinctive and unsettling aspects of his life, nature, and mission. as a miraculously created being, appointed a prophet and messiah, the seal of the prophets of Israel, and essentially no more. Otherwise, the Christological deadlock shall remain permanent. For Muslims, the Jesus of Christian faith will remain a divisive figure whose mission cannot provide a basis for genuinely harmonious coexistence among the adherents of the Semitic trio of revealed faiths. The Qur’an envisages these three groups disputing in front of their Lord on the day of resurrection (Qur’an 5:48).Muslims are religiously obliged to demonstrate that Jesus himself preached only a pure monotheism. Only then can we prove that the Muslim Jesus was the true leader of the Jesus movement. No Muslim can take as a leader someone who rejects or compromises strict Abrahamic monotheism. This is an essential qualification for anyone who claims to be a leader or exemplar for Muslims. entertained the prevalent Jewish view, he would have seen his role as that of a revolutionary, a zealous prophet and a human messiah who would deliver the Jews from the political bondage of Gentile nations. Christian tradition has bestowed countless honorific titles on Jesus who, as Christ, enjoys the role of messiah, naturally, but also prophet, priest, and king. According to Christian doctrine, during Christ’s divinely willed but humanly accepted humiliation on earth, he was a mere servant under the law, voluntarily divested of his regal divine majesty; in his later exaltation as Lord, after the resurrection from the dead, he rose above the law. Leaving aside the Muslim caveat that Allah would never humiliate his messenger, did Jesus proclaim himself the Son of God and/or God? . Objective historical and critical scholarship on Jesus for the past 100 years confirms the truth of the Qur’anic portrait as both converge on a Jewish Jesus. Islam is not annexing or colonizing the Christian Jesus, merely rescuing the historical character from the clutches of later church conjecture and dogma. Christians are called to change and meet Muslims on Muslim ground since the entire Qur’an is unchanged and unchangeable. By contrast, both testaments of the Bible are widely acknowledged by Jewish and Christian scholars themselves to be mainly edicts that evolved over centuries, under human if inspired redaction, the texts being, in the case of the New Testament, in demotic Greek while reporting the classical Aramaic speech of Jesus yaqeeninstitute.org/shabbir-akhtar/finding-and-following-jesus-the-muslim-claim-to-the-messiah

[@omarrphillips9710]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/hIWcg5SAndaJebM The Holy Quran Surah 37:4 Surely Your God is One! Surah 24:35 Allah Is The Light it Surah 24:15 it Surah 10:19 Surah 10:88-99 Pharaoh King James Version Revelation 22:18-19 This Book Exodus 24:7 The Book One Galatians 3:20 1 John 1:5 God is Light 1 John 5:7 For There are Three That Bear Record In Heaven, The Father, The Word, and The Holy Ghost: And These Three are One. Matthew 23:9 One is Your Father Jerusalem Galatians 4:26 The Mother of Us All Matthew 23:8 All ye are Brethren Light 1 John 1:5 John 1:1 The Word Light Genesis 1:5 Day Day Psalm 118:24 it Psalm 118:27 God is The Lord Acts 13:2 The Holy Ghost John 5:35 Light Luke 3:21-23 The Holy Ghost Light John 1:6-13 Name Day Zechariah 14:9 His name One Exodus 12:49 One Law Psalm 119:142 Thy Law Mark 12:32 The Truth: For There is One God; And There is none other But he: Light Psalm 119:130 it Hebrews 13:2 Be Not forgetful to entertain Strangers: for thereby Some have entertained Angels Unawares. One Genesis 41:25 Romans 9:17 Pharaoh John 20:14 it Exodus 16:14-16 Omer Acts 8:6 Philip Daniel 2:31-38 Thou Art This Head Of Gold Ezekiel 10:20 Living Jeremiah 8:21 I am Black Job 13:26-28 My Feet John 1:49 The King of Israel Hebrews 7:3 Without Psalm 18:9 He Bowed Revelation 1:15 Many Waters John 8:17-18 Two Ezekiel 31:18 This is Pharaoh Revelation 1:18 I Am he that Liveth, And was Dead; and, Behold, I am Alive for Evermore, Amen; and Have The Keys of Hell And of Death. Light 1 Thessalonians 5:5 Light Psalm 27:1 Exodus 23:20-22 Behold Matthew 6:24 No Man Light Psalm 119:105 Light Ephesians 5:8 Exodus 6:13 Pharaoh Romans 9:15 For He saith to Moses, I will have Mercy On whom I will Have Mercy, and I Will have compassion On whom I will Have compassion. Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 Fear God Revelation 22:9 Worship God images.app.goo.gl/8eiYgsHWScZNGfBL8 images.app.goo.gl/uE1iPGaZizs1dgDy5

[@cure4islamophobia649]

@seek mogol what do you understand from this

[@MASHKOOR]

@seek mogol i have the book in my mosque sahi bukhari U want to see that or you want to see on webs tell me ? I can give you for reading

[@gudbrid8702]

Mashaa ALLAH amazing Dr zakir sirji correct answers 👌🏻👍🏻👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👏👏👏thanks🙏🙏🙏may Almighty ALLAH bless always n protect you alway Ameen suma Ameen 🤲🤲🤲🤲wishes you all the best of luck keep going inshaa it will be done by HIS GRACE inshaa ALLAH ☝️👌🏻👍🏻👌🏻👍🏻❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@zakiferdaous9253]

Sir Assalamualaikum. We Bangladeshi people can't watch Peace TV Bangla, as our government banned this channel. Only those people can watch it who have 10/12 feet big dish antenna (intelsat 20- 68°), and I think 99% people can't watch it from Bangladesh. So if u can shift Peace TV Bangla in Asiasat 7 - 105° (Couple of days ago peace TV Chinese was there but now shifted in 68°) or in between 100°-119° then we can watch this channel by a small dish antenna, because its very easy to track this location from our county, even our country's all national channel is in 119°. So all our Bangladeshi people who have personal dishes are in this position. So please shift this channel in asiasat 7 - 105°. Thank You!

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@nee20101982]

Ok will do

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

@@nee20101982 Tq

[@snipeminecrafter3001]

Bro I have a solution, even my Government banned that, So if you have a mobile or laptop (I suppose you have), then go to this link and then click Peace TV Bangla. The video resolution is fine, and also this is the same Peace TV which runs on your TV. It also runs 24 hours non-stop. Here is the link: peacetvnetwork.visionip.tv/live

[@snipeminecrafter3001]

I hope it helps you brother.

[@user-pz7rg2oi1b]

اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين

[@aliadam761]

Humanity God's gifts ❓ Dr. Zakir Naik Ma Sha Allah

[@alshanvillageculture7299]

Excellent

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@Gremlin2u]

dont forget to watch the full story mentioning mohammed kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2bYcoiklrB_Y7M

[@Jose-gg8zn]

Nicely replied. The girl asked the questions, have a perspective based on the culture what she learned, raised and understood. If the question is based on an indian philosophy, you can apply indian wisdom to him. You cannt understand / estimate a 'being' in another culture unless you are aware of the philosophy, believes and patterns of the sytem. When Mr. Naik has replied, what I understood, all the questions she asked was stupid questions raised from a "being" seen only one kind of culture and phylosophy. When a word translated or interpreted by a non-native person, he explain it as per his understanding. It need not have the original meaning. However, these asks-reply sessions are wonderfully brainstorming. Thank yoi

[@ramadhanihudhaifani4376]

Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar! Allahu Akbar!🙏

[@servant-of-the-federation]

Great answer

[@ridoanirfan5162]

love you sir

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@saikumaru7999]

amainnnnnn

[@niyajulansary6664]

আসসালমুয়ালাইকুম স্যার

[@deenwithduniya1]

Asssalamualaikum wreh matullah wabarakatahu Faisal Khaleeq from lucknow uttar pradesh What do u say about Khalifa to our brothers as it is mentionedin QURAN Must reply sirr

[@mohammedfarhan4806]

Angel Giberal a.s also gave Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him bath to his heart and Prophet Muhammad also have taken ablution from zam zam water

[@shekhforid2159]

Alhamdulillh

[@Maha_jan]

Hare Krshna!!!

[@cure4islamophobia649]

Official written copy by Uthman The Quran was originally revealed in Quraishi dialect of Arabic. But to facilitate the people who speak other dialects, in their understanding and comprehension, Allah revealed the Quran finally in seven dialects of Arabic. During the period of Caliph Uthman (third successor to the Prophet) differences in reading the Quran among the various tribes became obvious, due to the various dialectical recitations. Dispute was arising, with each tribe calling its recitation as the correct one. This alarmed Uthman, who made an official copy in the Quraishi dialect, the dialect in which the Quran was revealed to the Prophet and was memorized by his companions. Thus this compilation by Uthman's Committee is not a different version of the Quran (like the Biblical versions) but the same original revelation given to the Prophet by One God, Allah. Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azherbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their differences in the recitation of the Quran, so he said to Uthman, 'O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent it to Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Quran, then write it in their (Quraishi) tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and ordered that all the other Quranic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt…" [29] Again a very stringent criteria was set up by this Committee to prevent any alteration of the Revelation. 1. The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one. [30] 2. Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet. [31] 3. Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council. [32] When the final recension was completed, Uthman sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina. The action of Uthman to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet. Zaid ibn Thabit is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!" [33] Another esteemed Companion Musab ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas said: "I saw the people assemble in large number at Uthman's burning of the prescribed copies (of the Quran), and they were all pleased with his action; not a one spoke out against him". [34] Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin of the Prophet and the fourth successor to the Prophet commented: "If I were in command in place of Uthman, I would have done the same". [35] Of the copies made by Uthman, two still exist to our day. One is in the city of Tashkent, (Uzbekistan) and the second one is in Istanbul (Turkey). Below is a brief account of both these copies: 1. The copy which Uthman sent to Madina was reportedly removed by the Turkish authorities to Istanbul, from where it came to Berlin during World War I. The Treaty of Versailles, which concluded World War I, contains the following clause: 'Article 246: Within six months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, Germany will restore to His Majesty, King of Hedjaz, the original Koran of Caliph Othman, which was removed from Madina by the Turkish authorities and is stated to have been presented to the ex-Emperor William II". [36] 'This manuscript then reached Istanbul, but not Madina (Where it now resides)'. [37] 2. The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 'It may be the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman'. [38] It Came to Samarkand in 890 Hijra (1485) and remained there till 1868. Then it was taken to St.Petersburg by the Russians in 1869. It remained there till 1917. A Russian orientalist gave a detailed description of it, saying that many pages were damaged and some were missing. A facsimile, some 50 copies, of this mushaf (copy) was produced by S.Pisareff in 1905. A copy was sent to the Ottoman Sultan 'Abdul Hamid, to the Shah of Iran, to the Amir of Bukhara, to Afghanistan, to Fas and some important Muslim personalities. One copy is now in the Columbia University Library (U.S.A.). [39] 'The Manuscript was afterwards returned to its former place and reached Tashkent in 1924, where it has remained since'. [40]

[@saikumaru7999]

yessssss

[@jahidulislamjoy3097]

Take love sir

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@RapFooViews]

Some one who can translate this to french for me please ?!

[@nadiabellaredj1186]

ماشاء الله الدكتور ذاكر نايك يحببك في الاسلام ويعطيك معلومات واقناعات مذهلة

[@officialyoudes]

As salamu alykoom

[@muslimboy6174]

💖💖☝️

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@kazifarhadulhaque686]

May allah bless upon dr. Zakir

[@nirjonahmed2345]

5:5

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@oromolammi3197]

S. A. W. S. A. W. S. A. W

[@user-lx8tj4co8d]

Oooooooo Bht hard

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@user-lx8tj4co8d]

@@irfanamdislamic6799 did brother

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

@@user-lx8tj4co8d thank you so much brother 💚

[@cure4islamophobia649]

Some Christians claim that the Quran has a scientific error in it regarding sperm production This is incorrect again. The critic focuses on the verses 86:6-7, especially verse 7 as this is where their contention is directed. The critic claims the Quran (86:7) is telling us that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib). The Arabic words mentioned by the Quran are sulb and tara’ib. Tara’ib is thought to mean ribs, though there is some dispute. However, the chief point of interest is the word sulb. Sulb can be translated as ‘loins’ or ‘backbone’ or ‘lower back’. The critic favours the translations which use the word ‘backbone’ as they use it to attack the Quran by claiming the Quran teaches that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib). However, the critic is very selective in deciding which translation to use as he/she avoids the numerous translations which translate ‘sulb’ as ‘loins’. They avoid these translations as they scupper their critical claims straight away as loins. Here, the word loins refers to: a. The region of the hips, groin, and lower abdomen. b. The reproductive organs. (1) So the critic refrains from using this translation for the word sulb as it is clearly scientifically accurate, ie the semen is produced in the are between the loins and ribs. So, if we translate the Quran (86:7) this way there is no contention. The misleading methodology of the critic is to avoid mention of the numerous translations which translate the word sulb as loins. Not only do they avoid mentioning the numerous translations using the word ‘loins’ they highlight translations which use the word ‘backbone’. This is rather deceptive, especially considering a number of non-Muslim translators, including a Christian translator, translates it as ‘loins’ ( A.J Arberry, George Sale, J.M Rodwell and Henry E Palmer) as well as a number of Muslim translators who also use the word loins (Hamid S Aziz, Muhammad M Ghali, Muhammad M Pickthall and Mohammad Asad) (4). It is unscholarly as well as misleading on the part of the critic not to mention this important fact. However, the critic does use Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s translation which translates it as ‘backbone’, therefore rendering a meaning of between the backbone and ribs. So the critic understands the Quran as teaching us that semen is produced between the backbone and ribs. In the way of intellectual honesty I do not want the reader to believe that only Abdullah Yusuf Ali translates this verse by using the word ‘backbone’, Shakir and Khan/Hilali also do this. The question still remains; which word should be used in the translation? Well, the critic does not tell you that Dr Edward William Lane’s Lexicon indicates the word sulb’ to mean ‘loins’ and even refers to the verse in question (86:7) as referring to the ‘loins’. So it does seem that the more accurate translation of this would be “between the loins and the ribs” as opposed to “between the backbone and the ribs” (4). Hence the critic uses the weaker translation. However, even if we assume the critic to be correct and take the translation; “between the backbone and the ribs” we still see no scientific error. The critic assumes that the ejaculate (semen) emanates from the testes, this is incorrect. Sperm is produced in the testes and is then transfered to the seminal vesicles awaiting ejaculation, the=is accounts for 5 % of the ejaculate, the rest of the ejaculate comes from the seminal vesicles (46-80%),with the prostate gland and the bulbourethral and urethral glands producing the rest of the ejaculate (2). At the time of ejaculation, all this (semen, which contains the sperm) is released From the seminal vesicles which are in fact between the backbone (coccyx, lower back) and the ribs! So if we run with the translation of the critics we see something that people would describe as a scientific miracle and not a scientific error. Osama Abdallah says the same thing but goes into a little more detail (bracketing is mine): “If one was to insist upon the literal meaning (the translation favoured by the critics), one would still find that the Quran is 100% correct literally, too. The seminal vesicles are anterior to the sacrum and coccyx (lower back, loin) and the ribs are anterior to the seminal vesicles. If one was to draw a line from the tip of the coccyx, to the upper portion of the seminal vesicle _ either one of the two_ and extend the line forward it will catch the ribcage.The seminal vesicles from which the semen spurts out during coitus, lies between the ribs and the coccyx (backbone)!” (3) The irony is that the critics accuse the Quran of making a scientific error yet the error is on their part as they only believe it to be an error as they wrongly believe semen emanates from the testes, while in fact in emanates from the seminal vesicles which are in between the backbone and the ribs! So now we all know the critics are being unfair, unscholarly and misleading when they claim the Quran (86:6-7) tells us that semen is produced in the kidneys etc.

[@aneesakram608]

@@josephbathula8488 1)It nowhere mentions the shape of the earth in that verse 2)It doesnt necessarily mean it set in a muddy spring, it was seen like that. it's an expression. nobody is that dumb to think like that 3)Alaq means a leech, or a clinging thing. and it is seen that in the second stage of embryonic development, it is shaped like a leech or as if it is hanging. 4)This is also refers to sperm as it is a gushing fluid, "maa'" does not only mean water.

[@cure4islamophobia649]

@@josephbathula8488 BIBLE AS GOD'S WORD ❓ Can God be the author of confusion and contradiction? i) I John 5:7 which hinted at the Trinity is taken out of every modern version of the Bible as it is not to be found in the most ancient manuscripts (that they have access to today). There is therefore no longer any verse in the Bible which preaches three gods as one. The Koran preaches that God is one indivisible, and not a trinity ( Koran 4:171) ii) II Samuel 24 :1 says that God incited David to number Israel . I Chronicles 21:1 says that Satan incited David to number Israel. God and Satan are not synonymous. iii) II Chronicles 36:9 says that Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he became king. II Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he became king. A difference of 10 years iv) II Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander. I Chronicles 1:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen Contradiction: one says 700 the other 7000. One says 40,000 horsemen(cavalry), the other 40,000 footmen (infantry). v) I Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots. I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses A difference of 36,000. vi) Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons. Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exile Arah having 652 sons. vii) John the Baptist contradicts Jesus. According to Jesus, John the Baptist was Elijah in his 2nd coming Matthew 17:11. John the Baptist denied being Elijah when the priests and Levites questioned him (John 1:19-21). viii) Was Jesus put on a cross (Stauron in Greek) Mark 15:11 or on a tree (Ksulon in Greek) I Peter 2:24 ix) John 3:13 Jesus says that none has ascended into heaven except the son of man who descended from heaven. This contradicts II Kings 2:11 which says that Elijah ascended into heaven. x) Genealogy of Jesus. a) From David to Jesus 41 names (generations) are given by Matthew [although he claims there are 42] as against the 26 names [generations] given by Luke [Luke 3]. A difference of 15 whole generations in the genealogy of the same man. Matthew mentions that Jesus was the seed of David through Solomon while Luke says that Jesus was the seed of David through Nathan [Solomon's brother]. This is a contradiction as the seed of David could never reach Jesus through Solomon and his brother Nathan at the same time. According to Matthew Jesus' grandfather is Jacob [the father of Joseph] while according to Luke it is Heli. xi) Luke doesn't claim inspiration of his Gospel by God. He wrote it because he knew of the events and it "seemed good to him" ( Luke 1:1-5). Also see I Corinthians 7:25 where Paul, in this specific case says that he's informing without God's commandment. II Timothy 3:16 is presented to "prove" that all of the Bible is God's inspiration, the above 2 references apart from the many others disprove that. The point is that the Bible itself doesn't claim to be completely from God (as a whole by name). That is what the Muslim point of view is also. Since God is all- Knowing and isn't the author of confusion, the above references cannot be from God. "How can you say that we are wise and that the law of the Lord is with us but behold, the false pen of the scribe has made it into a lie." Bible. Jeremiah 8:8 "Woe to those who write the Book with their own hands and then say:"This is from God", that they may trade it for some miserable gain. So woe to them for what their hands do write and woe to them for what they gain with it." Koran 2:79 This paper is not intended to be an attack on the Bible but is supposed to be an objective study and is recommended to be used as such. Indeed if similar mistakes were found in the Koran, I would gladly reject it as being God's word based on its own test: "Do they not carefully consider the Koran? If it had been for anyone other than Allah (God), it would contain many contradictions. " (Koran 4:82) May God guide us always closer to the truth. BIBLE PEACE: 20:29-30 The Israelites smite 100,000 Syrian soldiers in one day. A wall falls on 27,000 remaining Syrians . 2KI NGS2:23-24 Forty-two children are mauled and killed, presumably according to the will of God, for having jeered at a man of God. .2KI NGS5:27 Elisha curses Gehazi and his descendants forever with leprosy. .2KINGS 6:29 "So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I said to her, 'Give up your son so we may eat him,' but she had hidden him

[@AS-jj4dv]

Repeating this message all over the places does not make it true. See for alternative, reference based discussions: wikiislam.net/wiki/Main_Page

[@cure4islamophobia649]

@@josephbathula8488 Anes answer about Qur'an- BIBLE AS GOD'S WORD ❓ Can God be the author of confusion and contradiction? i) I John 5:7 which hinted at the Trinity is taken out of every modern version of the Bible as it is not to be found in the most ancient manuscripts (that they have access to today). There is therefore no longer any verse in the Bible which preaches three gods as one. The Koran preaches that God is one indivisible, and not a trinity ( Koran 4:171) ii) II Samuel 24 :1 says that God incited David to number Israel . I Chronicles 21:1 says that Satan incited David to number Israel. God and Satan are not synonymous. iii) II Chronicles 36:9 says that Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he became king. II Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he became king. A difference of 10 years iv) II Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander. I Chronicles 1:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen Contradiction: one says 700 the other 7000. One says 40,000 horsemen(cavalry), the other 40,000 footmen (infantry). v) I Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots. I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses A difference of 36,000. vi) Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons. Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exile Arah having 652 sons. vii) John the Baptist contradicts Jesus. According to Jesus, John the Baptist was Elijah in his 2nd coming Matthew 17:11. John the Baptist denied being Elijah when the priests and Levites questioned him (John 1:19-21). viii) Was Jesus put on a cross (Stauron in Greek) Mark 15:11 or on a tree (Ksulon in Greek) I Peter 2:24 ix) John 3:13 Jesus says that none has ascended into heaven except the son of man who descended from heaven. This contradicts II Kings 2:11 which says that Elijah ascended into heaven. x) Genealogy of Jesus. a) From David to Jesus 41 names (generations) are given by Matthew [although he claims there are 42] as against the 26 names [generations] given by Luke [Luke 3]. A difference of 15 whole generations in the genealogy of the same man. Matthew mentions that Jesus was the seed of David through Solomon while Luke says that Jesus was the seed of David through Nathan [Solomon's brother]. This is a contradiction as the seed of David could never reach Jesus through Solomon and his brother Nathan at the same time. According to Matthew Jesus' grandfather is Jacob [the father of Joseph] while according to Luke it is Heli. xi) Luke doesn't claim inspiration of his Gospel by God. He wrote it because he knew of the events and it "seemed good to him" ( Luke 1:1-5). Also see I Corinthians 7:25 where Paul, in this specific case says that he's informing without God's commandment. II Timothy 3:16 is presented to "prove" that all of the Bible is God's inspiration, the above 2 references apart from the many others disprove that. The point is that the Bible itself doesn't claim to be completely from God (as a whole by name). That is what the Muslim point of view is also. Since God is all- Knowing and isn't the author of confusion, the above references cannot be from God. "How can you say that we are wise and that the law of the Lord is with us but behold, the false pen of the scribe has made it into a lie." Bible. Jeremiah 8:8 "Woe to those who write the Book with their own hands and then say:"This is from God", that they may trade it for some miserable gain. So woe to them for what their hands do write and woe to them for what they gain with it." Koran 2:79 This paper is not intended to be an attack on the Bible but is supposed to be an objective study and is recommended to be used as such. Indeed if similar mistakes were found in the Koran, I would gladly reject it as being God's word based on its own test: "Do they not carefully consider the Koran? If it had been for anyone other than Allah (God), it would contain many contradictions. " (Koran 4:82) May God guide us always closer to the truth. BIBLE PEACE: 20:29-30 The Israelites smite 100,000 Syrian soldiers in one day. A wall falls on 27,000 remaining Syrians . 2KI NGS2:23-24 Forty-two children are mauled and killed, presumably according to the will of God, for having jeered at a man of God. .2KI NGS5:27 Elisha curses Gehazi and his descendants forever with leprosy. .2KINGS 6:29 "So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I said to her, 'Give up your son so we may eat him,' but she had hidden him

[@alisonelaa6742]

@@josephbathula8488 In first scientific error you are quoting the chapter number different so it is your mistake. The real ayah is this. (18:47) Bear in mind the Day when We shall set the mountains in motion42 and you will find the earth void and bare.43 On that Day We shall muster all men together, leaving none of them behind. Here it is occurence of Qiyamah the day of Judgment. “And we have made the earth egg shaped“. The Holy Qur’an, Chapter 79, Verse 30. Taking One Verse as consequence and leaving other Is also an amazing degree of dishonesty. 2)So he followed a way. Until, when he reached the setting place of the sun, he found it setting in a spring of black muddy (or hot) water. And he found near it a people. We (Allah) said (by inspiration): "O Dhul-Qarnain! Either you punish them, or treat them with kindness.”] The Cave 18:86-87, holy Quran If Holy Quran had said “Sun sets in muddy water” in a single direct precise statement then it will be a contradiction but Holy Quran didn’t say such a thing. But the above verse is related with a journey of a King Dhul Qarnain. I believe It’s all about directions and geography of a place or it has some hidden interpretation. The verse you pointed is related with a righteous King Dhul-Qarnain. May he also reached at similar place but to explain the verse it requires proper interpretation. This is clearly an allegorical verse and requires interpretation. For example still today we use words like ‘Land of rising sun’ for Japan but it means nothing. It’s just a place on Earth. Today also we say “Sun rise in East” and “Sun set in West” but Does it really mean anything except directions? We know Sun do not rise or set, It is the Earth which rotates around its axis at some angle. Read the next verses : [“ Then he followed another way, Until, when he came to the rising place of the sun, he found it rising on a people for whom We (Allah) had provided no shelter against the sun.”] The Cave 18:89-90, holy Quran Clearly all these are the verses are allegorical and not precise. They requires interpretation. Holy Quran clearly says : [“ It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muhammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific. As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allah and those firm in knowledge. Say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding.”] The Family of Imran 3:7 So in whose heart is deviation from truth they follow allegorical verses, seeking interpretation suitable to them. But it’s true interpretation is known to Allah and those firm in knowledge (infallibles). 3)Allah(swt) is telling about how he created his best creation from a clinging substance. The meaning of word علق are also "Leech like substance" & "sticky substance" & "Suspended" . Allah(swt) explains about the #basis_of_embryology consisely and then asked us again and again to ponder. It is now we know that the Fetus clings to the uterine wall at 5th day of conception, a process called . And fetus also acts as a Leech in a way it uses mother's blood to grow and develop. At day 22,before the closure of anterior neuropore, the embryo has exactly the same size and shape of a leech moreover. Moreover, The embryo is suspended during development through connecting stalk. So how on the Earth, someone who don't know to read or write can give such an Information other than God. Quran formed the basis of modern embryology by just saying the word "علق". #Implantation Surah AL-Mominoon verse 14, God has given a detailed description of how a human being is formed embryologically in a chronological order. #Translation" Then We made the sperm-drop into a clinging clot, and We made the clot into a lump [of flesh], and We made [from] the lump, bones, and We covered the bones with flesh; then We developed him into another creation. So blessed is Allah, the best of creators." 4)You should know this at least That cell is fundamental unit of life and 70 percent of cell is made up of water that is in cytoplasm. Historical error 1) Aaron (pbuh)and Moses (pbuh) sister name was also maryam.But this is different maryam .The maryam alai salam who is mother of Prophet Isa that is jesus P.B.U.H is the daughter of Prophet Imran alai salam .And there is a long gap of time between Prophet Moses and Jesus peace be upon both of them. 2) it is truth

[@fourqanealhaqq8542]

DEMONSTRATION OF THE EXISTENCE AND ONENESS OF GOD 1- introduction and divine uniqueness 2-existence of God 3-rules of application. 1- First of all, let us define reason and see its reliability: reason consists in understanding, ordering, prohibiting or administering through its distinction between good and evil to reach the reasonable one who serves and does not serve. Let's see if reason is reliable:everyone of good reason confirms that reason is educated by its environment from a young age in order to distinguish good from evil,true from false,it starts with: fire or needle hurts, milk makes good, then truth and lie, with internal and external verification by experience, then we generalize to the extension of reason (like happiness and unhappiness) and to the abstract by returning from time to time to the experience of reason by recognized examples, so we can say that reason is reliable. As for the ego, the self, it has its importance in my subject, because it compares and seeks (in cooperation with the reason) the ideal, the most powerful because the top is the most reasonable for him otherwise if a strong thing is not enough for him,he will get tired of it and look for something stronger than it, he'll be unhappy, in relative insecurity, because he's looking for the solid pillar, hence the expression "in myself something" to say that it's not satisfactory. Definition of worship in religion: to submit oneself to a being or a thing by love and veneration, to believe that it is useful and harmful (we see the link with the definition of reason and its combination with the ego and that then we live to worship anything and in a correct and reasonable way we seek "summit" happiness (for the ego, the summit is the most satisfying for the heart-ego) through that being or that thing since we take the reasonable). Definition of a god:a god is a being or a thing that we worship or is worshipful (worshipful=which deserves to be worshipped),we will be satisfied (this is the goal) to take the definition of a god as a being or a thing that is worshipful Equivalence "a god" and "he is a creator (from nothing)": A creator (from nothing) is a god: everything around us is made up of already existing elements, so creation from nothing is superior and it is the most impressive form of creation so it is summit (the heart and the ego confirm), so any creator from nothing is a god. Every god is a creator: if a god was not a creator then he would not deserve to be a god because God the Necessary Being (see part 2) is a creator (the creator see 2), therefore superior to that god, therefore that god does not deserve (for reason and ego) to be a god, he does not bring anything more, hence every god is a creator.Hence the equivalence. God the creator, the necessary being is the summit for the heart-ego: if he had a superior then that superior would be unknown, erased, moreover for the heart-ego it would imply that the necessary being is no longer a god (the heart-ego sees higher) therefore no longer a creator whereas it is the necessary being (contradiction) therefore that superior is not a god therefore is not a creator therefore God is uncreated and is at the summit. God is unique: if there were two different gods (at the summit), then either their will is different, then either each god applies his will (as they are gods it applies to the whole universe (not erased god)) then it is impossible (if their will is different at the same point),seeing the universe as it is without defect, and it is harmonious( else:if the different will of each god at a same point applies we then have a form of contradiction, from which we have the same will (contraposition)) and If one of the two gods imposes his will on the other, then the other is weak and therefore is no longer a god (contradiction), so their will coincides on everything, so it means that one flatters (strokes) the other, so it makes the ego-heart feel a weakness of this god in its power, so is no longer a god, so there is only one god, or again: if the two gods have their will which coincides in every point ,then they constitute a god of their union but God being at the top (the ideal), an indivisible god who creates, possesses and administers everything by himself is more impressive than several gods together, hence God is unique in every case. This reasoning applies even if there is a universe we do not know, because God (worshipful) must act everywhere otherwise he is no longer a god. 2-existence of God: There is an administrator for the universe:any example:a palace hyper organized in decorations,arrangements,household,if you are told:this palace does not have a butler(administrator),you will answer:it is not possible that it happens by itself without anybody,your distinctive healthy reason rejects it (you are not crazy),therefore all the more so (a fortiori): (organization much, much better than the palace) all the organization and harmony of nature and the universe make you reject that there is no administrator for the whole universe (we can already say that it is unique, the cycles and others are the mark of the same author, for example nike is the mark of a single manufacturer, example of all the atoms of the universe same process therefore same mark therefore same author), so there is an administrator for the whole universe, and even it is obliged to think that otherwise it is chaos,. ..and many many other examples like the ship without a captain,... there is a creator of the universe: You see a humanoid walking around and you're told no one created him. You're not crazy. Your reason will reject that.So a fortiori,all the more so Your good reason will reject that man has no creator.So There is a creator of the universe, and so on throughout creation, but again the whole universe has the same mark (like nike), so the same author, so the creator is unique and the administration of his creation is the same (layout, arrangement of the way of creating) so the creator is the administrator. As He is unique, He is the great owner of the universe, and He is the one who makes the rules of the universe (such as the instructions of the electrical appliances (operation, maintenance), so it has been proved that the universe has one Lord (the Creator, the owner and the administrator) and He is the only one who deserves to be worshipped, so He is the only God. Otherwise, as God the Creator is at the top, He is also the owner and the administrator. All this is the domain of the reasonable and if you come out of it you are no longer in the reasonable (chaos). Conclusion: Divine existence and oneness are then demonstrated by reason, but reason does not say everything that God wants from us, hence the prophets and messengers. 3- Application: The verse of the Qur'an that says that there is no god except Allah means that there is no one worthy of worship except Allah, so it means that there is no imperfection on any face, so the Qur'an, its word, has no imperfection since it is one of its characteristics and therefore one face of its perfection, Therefore, by the perfection of the Qur'an (read it in Arabic to see this reality and its explanation) and the uniqueness of the true (you must respect the rules of this book if you are honest) you must take the best interpretation of the verses and the Sunnah (path) of the Prophet (the Qur'an calls to follow the Prophet therefore apply his hadiths (hadiths=words in Arabic) and you must reconcile between the verses (of the Qur'an) and the verses, and verses/hadiths hadiths/hadiths (authentic) because the truth is quite unique and the best sought after is perfection (so correct yours intentions), for example the thief the penalty starts at 1/4 gold dinar, it costs (recently) 39€ for its weight in gold whereas a meal costs 5€, source: the pious predecessors (rule: the Koran says to follow the prophet and the prophet spoke of the first three generations which are the best and he said (ask your heart for clarification), and Allah calls in the Koran to the good and known between the good people (conciliation), etc,. .go on with the rest of the rules of Islam if you are honest (seek the best, perfection, truth, conciliation). There are rules in Islam and if you don't follow them you find imperfections (which reflect your bad intention), while when you correct your intention you find perfection (it exists, scholars communicate it to each other, I have been reading books about Islam in Arabic for a long time, I testify and I testify that this perfection exists. Why don't you take it if it is possible and the rules of Islam are to take it, hence your attacks are unfounded since this is not what God and his prophet mean (i.e : your words that it is imperfection). ..

[@mohammadtahmidimam]

asalamualaikum 🇧🇩

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@abubakarsgambo3556]

Legend 🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@sumanchakraborty1330]

I salute you Dr.Zakir Naik Sir !!!

[@sartaj1699]

444 like👌

[@mdmozammil350]

Dr.Zakir Naik when will you come back to India.

[@irfanamdislamic6799]

Pls Brother 🔴🔔☝🏼 do, brother it will be very useful to me 🥺

[@AS-jj4dv]

And face a trial ?

[@AsminaKhatun-mz2bj]

Sir, what will be the best name for my child boy. My name is Nurul Amin Shikder and my wife's name is Asmina Khatun. Please say sir.

[@AsminaKhatun-mz2bj]

@Suleiman _36 yup. I'm from Assam

[@creatorlight4346]

@Suleiman name him Allah.

[@haziqfawwad3490]

1:34 and 1:35 We can all see that DR, Zakir is a little angry here You know she's gonna lose bad! xd

[@niyajulansary6664]

Assalamuyalikum sir

[@omarrayan9121]

Zakir Naik is the besttt

[@fu6461]

Very nice brother. Funny and nice. That sister should accept i hope. Sister if you're reading this, give Islam a chance.

[@haxseen]

Not Islam ....but yourself a chance

[@badshafaisal1854]

I am not understanding that how can be Kalki is Muhammad (peace be upon him) because Kalki should arrive after 4,27,000 years and Muhammad (peace be upon him) arrived after 5000 years.So,how can be Kalki is Muhammad (peace be upon him)?

[@Gremlin2u]

because Kalki isn't Mohammed LOL

[@ZiIIous]

7:28 Ma'som means impeccable or protected by absolute rule. Muhammad PBUH was protected by God from getting killed and from great sins.

[@ZiIIous]

And small sins too, but after the command is revealed by Allah in a verse.

[@tanveerahmed2]

2:32 Mohammed Azharuddin

[@NavinKumarIndia]

Yess, he looks like our captain Mohammad Azharuddin.

[@cure4islamophobia649]

The signs that prove the prophecy of Muhammad (upon him be peace) are numerous. Many books have been written to enumerate them and thoroughly discuss them. We would like to mention some of these signs as reported by Muslim scholars and which prove that Muhammad  was a real Prophet including: - First, his good biography and high morals as well as the noble qualities that distinguished him. He was known before becoming a Prophet as a truthful and honest person, although the community where he lived was a society of ignorance. This was, perhaps, the most important sign of his prophecy. He was not known to have ever lied on people. So, why should he lie on be half of the Lord by claiming that he was a Prophet, if he was not a real Prophet? - Second, the powers and triumphs Allah gave him and the spread of the religion he preached, as well as the triumph of this religion over all existing religions in a short period of time. Had he been a liar, Allah would have humiliated and destroyed him as He did with those before him who falsely claimed Prophethood. - Third, the miracles Allah gave him as supporting evidence were beyond the ability of human beings and were beyond range of natural phenomena. The moon split for him, water gushed from his fingers, food became more abundant in his hands, and similar phenomena were authentically reported and happened in a way that could not be denied. - Fourth, the Prophet  was backed by the greatest miracle which is the Quran. In fact, Quran was a challenge and remains a challenge for Arabs who were known to be good poets and eloquent speakers. Allah challenged them to write a single Surah (chapter) that would be similar to that of Quran, but the Arabs were unable to do so. Indeed, the challenge still endures, none of the Arabs throughout history - since the revelation of the Quran - was able to make anything that was even similar to it. No doubt that the Quran has been preserved intact until it came to us. Groups of people memorized it including children, adults, males and females. So generations brought the Quran to generations until it reached us as it was revealed 14 centuries ago. Hence, the Quran remains intact protected from distortion or alteration. Nothing has been added to it, nor taken from it. Quran is full of scientific facts that were verified only in these times of scientific investigation. No doubt that Muhammad who was illiterate would not have possessed this knowledge 14 centuries ago. Doesn't this prove the authenticity of the Quran and that it is the Word of the Creator of the Universe who knows all its secrets? - Fifth, the things from the unseen that he (the Prophet ) informed us about. Some of them occurred during his life time. Others happened later. Some of these things happened to the Prophets, may Allah exalt their mention, who preceded him and some are still to occur. He also informed about the signs of The Day of Judgment, some of which had already been seen such as widespread killings and genocide, adultery and fornication and the consumption of the alcohol, outnumbering of males by females and the increased number of earthquakes, and afflictions,… etc. - Sixth, the testimony of some of the people of the Book that he was a true Prophet. Some of them believed in him like 'Abdullah Ibn Salam  who was a Jew as well as Negus (king of Abyssinia) who was a Christian. Some of the people of the Book certified that he was a Prophet from Allah but refused to follow him like Huyayy Ibn Akhtab. The above are some of the signs that prove his Prophethood and the authenticity of his revelations. We would like the questioner to visit some of the Islamic centers in her area, and hopefully, they will guide her to some useful references in the matter.

[@AS-jj4dv]

1. We all know that mohammad was not a kind person, he was a deceiver, warlord, sex-maniac, manipulator, and was responsible of killing people moking him or having different opinions 2. Islam was in essence spread largely by force, through wars and conquests, not really by gentle persuasion and conviction (forced conversions, apotheosis, threats, social and economic pressure…). 3. There are no miracles in the quran which has every sign of being conceived by humans, with the knowledge of the 7th century in the desert. The so-called ex post and recent “scientific” miracles are miracles of reinterpretation and absurd claims and reasoning. The quran contains a lot of errors and certainly no science. 4. The preservation of the quran is disputed (there are already more than 30 versions in circulation), and the historical records of the man-made book cannot be retraced completely. 5. There is no day of judgment. It is an unproven assertion, like the existence of hell, to instil fear among the believers. Widespread killings and genocide, adultery and fornication, consumption of the alcohol (and porc?), outnumbering of males by females (??) are human decisions and practices Theses have good or/and bad consequences, which can be evaluated. How do you know that the number of earthquakes has increased and since when? 6. There is no proof of the existence of god, and there is no proof of the personal revelation of mohammad. It is a question of belief, and as such derived claims cannot be sustained.

[@roger5515]

@@AS-jj4dv King James Version (KJV) The reign of Queen Elizabeth I (1558-1603) succeeded in imposing a high degree of uniformity upon the Church of England. Protestantism was reinstated as the official religion of England after the short reign of Mary I (1553-58), who had attempted to restore Roman Catholicism in the country. In 1604, soon after James’s coronation as king of England, a conference of churchmen requested that the English Bible be revised because existing translations “were corrupt and not answerable to the truth of the original.” The Great Bible that had been authorized by Henry VIII (1538) enjoyed some popularity, but its successive editions contained several inconsistencies. The Bishops’ Bible (1568) was well regarded by the clergy but failed to gain wide acceptance or the official authorization of Elizabeth. The most popular English translation was the Geneva Bible (1557; first published in England in 1576), which had been made in Geneva by English Protestants living in exile during Mary’s persecutions. Never authorized by the crown, it was particularly popular among Puritans but not among many more-conservative clergymen.

[@AnjumulHaque]

I agree with many things by Zakir sir, but I don't agree with him saying Hinduism come from same God of Abraham as Muslims believe, most of Vedas, and religious books are not divinely inspired as he sometimes imply, those books are written by ancient Brahmin academics some of them are pure fictitious literature while some of them are facts but most of them are man made spiritual. It is possible some of them were inspired by the psychadelic experience of Soma, the amanita muscaria being the earlier ones used and the second one psilocybe cubensis replaced the former one at some time. The golden psilocybe cubensis mushroom usually grows on cow dungs and the feeling of divine connection achieved from intoxicating in it had led to the reverence of cows in India.

[@alfredcertainly7599]

Nice answers but what about Panchjanya

[@SAJEDMUNIR]

*The 25 Prophets of Allah mentioned in the Quran* 1. Adam 2. Idris (Enoch) 3. Nuh (Noah) 4. Hud 5. Salih 6. Ibrahim (Abraham) 7. Ismail (Ishmael) 8. Ishaq (Isaac) 9. Lut (lot) 10. Yaqub (Jacob) 11. Yusuf (Joseph) 12. Shuaib 13. Ayyub (Job) 14. Mussa (Moses) 15. Harun (Aaron) 16. Dhul Kifl (Ezekiel) 17. Dawud (David) 18. Sulaiman (Soloman) 19. Ilyas (Elias) 20. Al Yasa (Elisha) 21. Yunus (Jonah) 22. Zakariyya (Zekariah) 23. Yahya (John) 24. Isa (Jesus) 25. Muhammed Peace be upon them all. *(All the prophets mentioned in the Quran were sent to worship Allah alone, and that is the true religion, - Islamic Monotheism) 124,000 prophets were sent to all nations as mentioned in the Sunnah.*

[@AS-jj4dv]

Adam a prophet? Maybe methaphorically, but not in real. On earth, humans appeared through Evolution (natural selection and random DNA changes creating a variety of life forms) and not through the created couple Adam and Eve (from clay and water), i.e. a myth copied into the quran from the bible, an idea originated in Mesopotamia. The actual homo sapiens exists only for about 200’000 years, originating from humanoids with an evolution history of 2 to 4 million years. All living creature has an evolutionary origin. Evolution is a fact: see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution and as an illustration: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqG7kpx9bbFlbtU. An important mystery exists yet, that is the appearance and origin of life itself, in its simplest form. But scientists are working on the problem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis).

[@tariqueanwar6906]

To overcome evil with good is good, to resist evil by evil is evil-Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) Islamic content creator.

[@user-be2tw4xg7x]

What?

[@user-be2tw4xg7x]

@Ilyas Omari Mashallah, yes

[@mahabaliiii]

So what is ' really ' writen in 'Bhavishya Puran ' is भविष्यपुराणम् - प्रतिसर्गपर्य सूत उवाच इति श्रुत्वा स देवः शब्दमाह नृपाय तम् । गन्तव्यं भोजराजेन महाकालेश्वरस्थले ॥९ म्लेच्छेमुषिता भूमिर्वाहीका नाम विश्रुता । आर्य्यधर्मो हि नैवात्र वाहीके देशदारुणे ।। १० वात्र महामायी योऽसौ दाधो मया पुरा । त्रिपुरो बलिदैत्येन प्रेषितः पुनरागतः ॥ ११ अयोनिः स वरो मत्तः प्राप्तवान्दैत्यवर्द्धनः । महत्मद इति ख्यातः वैशाकृतितत्परः ॥ १२ नागन्तव्यं त्वया भूप पैशाचे देशपूर्तये । मत्प्रसादेन भूपाल तव शुद्धिः प्रजायते ॥ १३ इति श्रुत्वा नृपश्चैव स्वदेशात्पुनरागमत् । महामद तैः सार्द्ध सिन्धुतीरमुपायौ ॥ १४ उवाच भूपति प्रेम्णा मत्यामदविशारदः । तब देवो महाराज मम दासत्वमागतः २०१५ मग समुञ्जीपायथा तत्पश्य भो नृप । इति श्रुत्वा तथा दृष्टा परं विस्मयमागतः ॥ १६ म्लेच्छधर्मे मतिवासीत्तस्य भूपस्य दारुणे ।।१७ कालिदास्तु रुथा प्राह महामदम् । माया से निर्मिता धूर्त नृपमोहनहेतवे ।। १८ हनिष्यामि दुराचार वाहीकं पुरुषाधमम् । इत्युक्ा स द्विजः श्रीमान्नानपतत्परः ।। १९ त्या दशसह च तद्दशांश जुहाव सः । भस्म नृत्वा स मायानी म्लेच्छदेवत्वमागतः ॥२० भयभीतास्तु या देशबाहीकमाययुः । गृहीत्वा स्वगुरोर्भीम महत्वमागतम् ॥२१ स्थापितं तं भूमध्ये तत्रोर्मदतत्पराः । मदहीनं पुरं जातं तेषां तीर्थ समं स्मृतम् ॥ २२ रात्रौ स देवरूप बहुमायाविशारदः । पैशाचं देहमास्थाय भोजराज हि सोऽब्रवीत् ॥ २३ Sut ji said - After listening to this praise, Shiv ji said to the king - Bhojraj! You go to the land called Bahik of Mahakaleshwar place, that land is being polluted by Mlechhas. There is no Aryadharma in that dreadful Vahik province. Here Tripurasura, sent by the sacrificial demon, has come again, whom I had destroyed Mahamayabi. He is the best born from Ayoni, and the progenitor of the Daityavansh ( Demon clan). 'Mahamad' (Muhammad as this video is trying to say) is the name of him, who always keeps doing vampire deeds ( bad deeds). So Rajan, don't stay in this land of rascals and vampires, you will be purified by my grace. Hearing this, the king left for his country. Mahamad along with his disciples also came to the banks of river Indus. That skilled illusionist said to the king with love - Maharaj! Your god is my servant, Nrip! See, they eat my waste food. The king was very surprised to see and hear this.9 16 And he also started thinking of becoming a follower of that terrible mocha-religion. At that time, Kalidas got angry and said to Mahamad, you cunning! This is your illusion to fascinate the king, so I will kill you such a miscreant and slanderer of Vahik. Having said this, the Brahmin started offering oblations from the tenth part of the Navarna mantra after chanting it for ten thousand times. In that he turned into ashes and became the god of Mlechhas. After that all his disciples got scared and went to Vaheek country. Taking the ashes of their Guru (Muhammad) there and setting them in the middle (under) the ground, they became calm. That place was established by the name of 'Madheen Pur' (Madina). That is the place of pilgrimage for those people. 17-22. At night that elusive god feasts in the form of a vampire ( As you can read, This Hindu text talks about Demon named 'Mahamad ' and not your prophet Muhammad. I challenge to show me a translation of this book done by any Hindu Sanskrit Scholar. The translation you are showing me is written in many ' dava' and Tabliki books you guys have and in which translation is done perposfully wrong to convert Hindus into Muslim.)

[@luqmanmarijanov2252]

Ooo man Dr. ZAKIR NAIK has really a mind who notice everything which blessing from Allah swt

[@samlandry2798]

He used the slang term for cops il dying😂😂

[@hightecguru812]

In title you should add but she refused to accept the truth

[@shoaibahmad3933]

It's even not mentioned that she's gonna accept islam brother

[@zulfatris7053]

@@shoaibahmad3933 did you even heard her question? she said if he can answer, Im ready to accept Islam today

[@shoaibahmad3933]

@@zulfatris7053 brother had you seen the full version of this video go watch it... Replying after a long time though 😊

[@mbj1002]

Most of the versus from bhavishya Purana has been written in 16th and 17 th centuries and prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has been called wicked person in that. Why does zakir Naik still insist that prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has been mentioned in that

[@aivstories9743]

Pisacha means meat-eaters Not devil . But Hindus call a meat eater a devil. It doesn't mean he is devil . Pandit ved Prakash upadya, m.s swaminathan , swami Prabhupada ,shri Ravi Shankar confirmed that Muhammad is mentioned as he will destroy people of corruption and bad habits

[@niyajulansary6664]

I am Indian

[@AdnanKhan-et8bd]

At 2:26 i saw mohammed azharuddin

[@johnali349]

DID SHE ACCEPT,?

[@DoubleDouble416]

So; did she accept islam or not?

[@snipeminecrafter3001]

Nope, You know Allah gives guidance to whom he wants. The other people have their hearts closed as Allah (SWT) says in Surah Baqarah Ch-2, So even if Dr Zakir Naik defeated her, if Allah gives guidance (Hidayah) to her, then only she will be able to accept Islam.

[@Pathan7866]

Did Zakir Naik just compared himself to Prophet Muhammad(SWA) in this video?????

[@drahmad765]

Part 708 mathew

[@farhan4u2c]

Did she embraced islam after the answers given?

[@milotxh]

One question for dr Zahir. Since you are so popular and very well spoken person. Why don't u lead a country the way Islam teaches u to do it. My theory is actions speak louder then words.

[@ayaanz350]

i think you know the answer to that for god's sake...

[@Uniquely_L1]

In what way is he not leading the way Islam teaches?

[@jonron3805]

6:29 He is giving a very ambigious connection. Just because he does not have an answer he expects people to believe him. People believe him only because they want to believe them not because he is always right.

[@nemoyap]

"Pig" as a derogatory term goes back to the 16th century, and denotes an unattractive, unpleasant, or greedy person. Its use in the context of police officers is a reference to the police allegedly being corrupt and "on the take"