In The Files - Update SEEK & DESTROY 4th Dev Server - War Thunder

Pre-Order Bundle : store.gaijin.net/story.php?pa...
Pre-Order Bundle : store.gaijin.net/story.php?pa...
Get 3% Off on the War Thunder Store + DECAL :
bit.ly/3iLtBwh
Get 3% Off on the Enlisted Store :
bit.ly/3lqRLhz
Support my work on Patreon :
/ theeuropeancanadian
Support my work on SubscribeStar :
www.subscribestar.com/tec
Check out the Merch Store :
www.redbubble.com/people/TEC-...
Dev Server Changelog :
forum.warthunder.com/t/major-...
Seek & Destroy Update Teaser:
warthunder.com/en/news/8920-v...
Unused assets of War Thunder (2.36.0.16 & 2.36.0.18)
/ unused_assets_of_war_t...
I am part of the War Thunder and Enlisted Content Partnership Program :
warthunder.com/en/media/partne...
All My Social Media Links :
linktr.ee/theeuropeancanadian
We have partnered with Humble Bundle :
www.humblebundle.com/?partner...
We have partnered with Fanatical :
www.fanatical.com/?ref=TheEur...
We have partnered with Chrono.gg :
www.chrono.gg/TECHUB
Send your Replays or Questions here :
[e-mail]
Music used from:
/ teknoaxe
/ channel
System Specs : Intel Core i7-10700F CPU @ 2.90GHz, 32GB DDR4 @ 3200MHz, EVGA 3070TI FTW3
Hope you enjoy the video and have an amazing day :)
#gaming #news #warthunder

[@smithsonian_98]

9K72 is scud, not iskander, iskander is 9K720

[@kanoeyuuko195]

who would have noticed that

[@Spy-.]

@@kanoeyuuko195him

[@stilpa1]

@@kanoeyuuko195 you can literally see the vehicle

[@SCP-4217-A]

Bruh your both dumb, the 9k70 is the Elbrus not Scud, that is the Elbrus the Scud is a ballistic missile unit on the same chassis but that one on screen is a Elbrus

[@smithsonian_98]

@@kanoeyuuko195 iskander carry 2 missiles, and stored inside a compartment, but scud carry 1 missile and doesn't have a closed storage

[@lsq7833]

The MICA IR is an IR missile that shares its maneuverability with the EM version, and also has the datalink as well. You can launch it like a fox-3, except the terminal guidance will be IR so that's a 0 warning long-range missile that is immune to multipathing. It woulf be all kinds of broken in game right now😂

[@nicolaspeigne1429]

Imagine you're launching it at 20 km but the ennemy thinks it's an EM so he notches it or even try to go cold, except it's an IR

[@PvtPartzz]

Damn, I always wondered why these missiles weren’t more popular and turns out they always have been, I just never knew they existed.

[@Yamaha_Kid]

Hopefully the give its irl range and the ET the R27ET locking range is reduced for balance

[@garrettobrien5197]

@@nicolaspeigne1429and their adding the ability to drop chaff and flares separate so he dosnt even flare. Just chaffs. Would make the R27ET look like shit

[@nicolaspeigne1429]

@@garrettobrien5197 the only difference you could see on the receiving end is one less icon on your RWR

[@germantanker131johnny2]

I really hope the Grad becomes playable one day

[@alexanderhopkins]

And tos 1A

[@nickkozak4763]

M270 as well!!

[@freezie4511]

@@alexanderhopkins "makes the TOS-1 7.3br - is only able to kill opentops"

[@alexanderhopkins]

@@freezie4511 lmao that would be so disappointing

[@blackmagnetica8714]

​@@alexanderhopkins Absolute cancer when the thermobaric round is included

[@regulator0-62]

I’m excited for the MLRS

[@regulator0-62]

If only they’d make an actual artillery system😊

[@pauld6967]

I agree that we need the MLRS in the game. Bonus points to Gaijin if it is a playable vehicle.

[@fennoman9241]

@@regulator0-62hopefully not

[@i_nameless_i-jgsdf]

@@regulator0-62 This has nothing to do with an "actual artillery system." The map in the game isn't large enough to allow for indirect fire from 20 km away, with the gun shooting horizontally so the shell drops onto its target from above. The thing is, you can do this in the game if the map were big enough because War Thunder has "bullet drop." But if you meant a similar mechanic to World of Tanks, where the shell is fired up into the sky and magically drops onto a target 5 km away, then no thanks...

[@i_nameless_i-jgsdf]

@@pauld6967 Type 75 MLRS exists btw.

[@pauld6967]

At first glance, that last missile had me thinking it was an SM-2, the surface-to-air missile used on U.S. Navy ships.

[@darkhowling6425]

Looking at the "Iskander" you mentioned, i think thats a Scud launcher rather than the Iskander, the cradle looks like the scud cradle shown in Wikipedia rather than the ISkander cradle. Please let it be a Scud, some scud interception missions could be fun.

[@mielpops4655]

I dont think people know how powerfull is the mica ir, its one of the most advanced missle in the world, mach 4, fox 2 with a range of 60km, max g 50 at short range and 30 at long range,it also has thust vectoring...

[@iulian29-67]

SAM sites, radar installations, or artillery/ballistic missile emplacements on (even larger) EC maps would make simulator or even RB a lot more fun, since you can now do something else besides air to air quite reliably. Give it an incentive to go for those like a radar station pointing out enemy positions or a ballistic missile site targeting your airfield, and air battles will look a bit more like DCS than Ace Combat, which would be nice

[@Narsheo]

Damn a video by you that isnt over 10 minutes. Progress!

[@kaiotie1]

pretty sure Britain use the M270 too; in multiple variants. Seen a few of them in for repairs when talking to a mechanic friend in the army.

[@FifingFossil]

Britain, germany, france(as LRU), Finland( they are under upgrading to M270A2), Israel, Norway, Italy(M270A1 version), Baltic States are about to buy few. Basically this is standard NATO MRLS

[@pauld6967]

Deateoying a unit of Transporter-Erector-Launcher (TEL) vehicles before they can fire is indeed a fun challenge.

[@fubukilin8578]

the boat at the first, I knew it was french before you said so because it has the proper french flag on it :D

[@lordwintertown8284]

That model of the NV Gogol is rather pretty but it will as you say likely be a background item like the tanker Sigma Triumph, Hm it wo7ld be cool if we got armed paddlesteamers added one day.

[@markthegamer5304]

That reason for not adding the Shrike is dumb, because it's false. The Shrike is so simple that it does not care or know at what it's pointing, the only thing it cares about is if the Seeker Head can see the frequency of the Radar you're trying to fire at. This differs between seeker heads that it can carry. So if you pointed a Shrike with a seeker head in the 2-4GHZ range, it will see a radar that falls within that range, no matter if it is a single radar, a TELAR or a full SAM site, because it can't tell the difference

[@MuhammadAli-255]

Has Gaijin said anything about how they will be implemented and in what game mode?

[@iangrobler4792]

Atlas Cheetah ❤

[@rammen4]

Where?

[@blank3041]

Why did you get my hopes up.

[@thebakedcattato]

AGM-88 HARM my beloved

[@blackdead1968]

oi a thing did the F15J(M) even ever existet or is it just like the F16AJ a plane that was only tested ???? because i never heard anything about a J(M) only a bout A F15DJ.

[@kronosestarfinder9574]

I hope the grad and M270 come to tech trees, they could be fun

[@perrycox93perro43]

i hope the mlrs on day can be playable

[@maindurchfall4012]

idk kno why but i had a wz ad berfore the video

[@joshuathomas8529]

I started out in the US army as a M270a1 crew member,t that would aswsom if this was playable.

[@zeta4687]

agm88 i can't wait

[@gojithecringe]

Recreating Desert Storm had been made easier for custom mission makers (Hey the steamship i requested on the stream!)

[@germantanker131johnny2]

Also based choice with that paddle steamer

[@milnersway569]

I swear that’s a scud ballistic missile 👀 ai units are good helps spade vehicles at the start….. you know what be really good if them ai units fire like randomly at cities like some fake scenario

[@sosigakaweinerman869]

A PVE gamemode for Jets and props would be nice. I'm tired of having to commit to PVP just to get anywhere.

[@sanda3883]

It's not that HARMs don't target vehicles, it's that they target radars, it requires the HARM carrier to be locked up throughout the attack, it would absolutely work on smaller radar arrays, it would just need to be closer range so that it can be locked up, Pantsirs would be excellent targets

[@markthegamer5304]

Funnily enough, and this is never coming to WT, AGM-88E and AGM-88G both have Milimeter wave radar homing, meaning it can target anything it can see with it's radar. But yeah, for the most used HARM it can only target things with Radar

[@BDP0408]

all i want is my A37B dragonfly

[@Sonoran.Monsoon]

Pokes up and smashes people with it. Take my money.

[@user-pu1uj6zh5h]

French boat with white flag, very accurate.

[@MissileGuidanceSystem]

Wassup euro

[@lada_niva_1.7i]

Bro, Bm21 not as a ground vehicle? Is this a joke?

[@kajmak64bit76]

It's even more cursed... it's actually a naval vehicle Itxs already on a boat... i think Battlepass from Egypt in german or Russian tech tree

[@lada_niva_1.7i]

@@kajmak64bit76 youre talking about the weapon system on a boat, im talking about the weapon system on the ural 4320 truck

[@kajmak64bit76]

@@lada_niva_1.7i it's the same thing but on a boat tho We already have it ingame but it's super bad We need it on a ground vehicle and gaijin will just make it an event vehicle Lmao

[@lucks_zh5959]

No way himars🤣

[@Iden_in_the_Rain]

I mean the SLAMRAAM was only ever on the Humvee or HIMARS so it makes sense

[@pendraig5446]

mirage 2k s4 gets mica too?

[@Escaloplatross]

Nope

[@jamesperez1464]

Do you think they will ever add the Iowa class to the game

[@ICECAPPEDSKY]

Already in the mobile game version of warthunder along with Yamato, Bismarck and submarines so yes. Fair to say they will all come to the base game.

[@gojithecringe]

I mean probably, theres Tirpitz in CDK (model and research icon)

[@uniquethoughtss4985]

nerf the adats for no reason and give us the patriot system on a hemett

[@t2mediumplayer47]

Why bother with another coastal fleet? They could spend that time on something else...

[@doomguy.23frommars60]

Because submarines are coming and coastal sub chasers are great against them

[@t2mediumplayer47]

@@doomguy.23frommars60 Let's be honest, probably only 30% navy players will us coastal to fight them. Rest will be just depth charges from destroyers or something.

[@ICECAPPEDSKY]

@@t2mediumplayer47the coastal boats technically will be the best for it though. More speed depending on the boat and significantly more maneuverable.

[@lordwintertown8284]

From the standpoint of NF players "coastal" or just MTB's/ bluewater frigates can be quite crucial, ATM french players don't have the ability to contest cap zones quickly nor have proper AA defence ships with their current bluewater branch. From a Ground standpoint it be like not having a light tank or SPAAG for several months or not having a fighter bomber in an aviation sense.

[@rojevil2829]

why add AI that planes wouldnt even care instead of making them playable ground vehicles

[@PvtPartzz]

They’ll probably be targets for aircraft in Enduring Confrontation battle modes. This is actually huge for gameplay if they can actually defend themselves since it changes up the gameplay a lot. Air rb and sb are incredibly stale (sb less so but it still gets boring) so this indicates they’re likely working on new game modes or improving EC to bring it back to air rb sometime in the future. The sooner the better.

[@doomguy.23frommars60]

I mean if u wanna those vehicles against sure u do you also players would care if those AI starts shooting missles at them

[@rojevil2829]

i'm pretty sure the bm-21 and m270 are for artillery and not anti aircraft capacity

[@kajmak64bit76]

Don't know what you're talking about These new ground targets for air battles are AMAZING Can't wait to try them out tommorow maybe

[@rojevil2829]

@@kajmak64bit76ironic

[@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh5832]

Harms would be nice

[@wielkielolstwo]

i was happy for a moment that we would get ural truck for ground tech tree, but it is only as "target" :/ #BringTechnicalsToWT