Insane Aircraft Engines Sound That Will Shake Your Soul ▶ 2

Рет қаралды 156,067

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 68

@stevehicks8944 Ай бұрын

So, the Lycoming T53 has a bore of 4.5 inches and a stroke of 4.5 inches? Been around turbine engines for the last forty-one years; never seen a turbine engine with a bore or a stroke, period.

@harrothepilot 20 күн бұрын

And it was also 15 cylinders!? 😀

@wayneneher6362 2 ай бұрын

Somebody needs an education about Fifi. The R-4360 was used in the B-50, NOT the B-29. Fifi runs Wright Cyclone R-3350 Double Cyclones, NOT Pratt & Whitney Wasp Majors.

@matthewcasey5059 2 ай бұрын

@@wayneneher6362 spot on the biggest and easiest way to spot the difference between a B29 and 50 is the very different cowlings for the two different engines.

@wayneneher6362 2 ай бұрын

@@matthewcasey5059 and the intercoolers under the engine cowlings, that big scoop.

Ай бұрын

"Over the next three plus years, the original Wright R-3350-57AM engines were exchanged for new engines built using parts from later model engines that powered the Douglas A-1 Skyraider and Fairchild C-119 Flying Boxcar during the Vietnam War, a custom built combination of the Wright R-3350-95W and Wright R-3350-26WD engines." From Wikipedia...

@stevehicks8944 Ай бұрын

Duplex Cyclone, not Double Cyclone.

@RedneckSpaceman 26 күн бұрын

Common misunderstanding.

@frequentflyer56 Ай бұрын

Great video, loved hearing the engines. Sorry to say though, I wasn't blown away and they didn't shake my soul ▶2. What does ▶2 mean?

@technofusionhd Ай бұрын

▶2 means Part 2

@RedneckSpaceman 26 күн бұрын

@@technofusionhd 0000 0010 😉

@kimmer6 2 ай бұрын

OK, How the EFF does a Lycoming T53 helicopter gas turbine engine have a Bore and Stroke and 15 cylinders? 12:29

@1tonyboat 2 ай бұрын

That had me scratching my head also ....

@Michael-t3b5b 2 ай бұрын

The same way it only burns 80 pounds of fuel an hour

@kraken767 Ай бұрын

somebody didnt fact check when they made the vid

@c.e.g7448 Ай бұрын

That was what I was thinking too.

@Sarah_Swede Ай бұрын

It's magic baby, Top Secret !

@stevewhalen6973 Ай бұрын

Thanks!

@technofusionhd Ай бұрын

Your Welcome! 🤗

@CosmicGaming_1234 25 күн бұрын

When its too hot in your room:

@josephinebennington7247 Ай бұрын

Each static engine is thinking “can’t we just go somewhere, do something useful?”

@spazmonkey3815 Ай бұрын

My soul was not shaken.

@nathanielmcguire6685 Ай бұрын

Someone explain to be what bore and stroke he’s talking about on these jet engines

@AlanTatham-e6w 2 ай бұрын

I have watched many films on you tube for quite a few years now and I fail to understand WHY the presenters of these films keep showing a mirror image so often, what is the point of that ridiculous idea ????????????????? I now refuse to subscribe to the people that make up films like this

@leifvejby8023 Ай бұрын

I'm worse, I block them!

@profpep Ай бұрын

Because they using the clip footage wiithout, and mirror imaging them makes it harder for the algorithms to detect them as the original, and fends of copyright strikes.

@Fire21ccfd Ай бұрын

Finally! An explanation, and it actually makes sense!

@daveroe6480 24 күн бұрын

@@profpep, makes sense, but really annoying if you’re trying to read something like a sign in the background, or attempting to figure out what chord a guitarist is playing, etc.

@wickertwm 2 ай бұрын

The R-3350 was not very reliable at first. The bombers flying to Tinian carried and extra engine in the bomb bay as engine failures were very common and having extra engines at the base was imperative.

@jimschutz Ай бұрын

Friendly comment here: 3:23 these engines are NOT known for their reliability on the B-29 as shown. My research online tends to blame the "gill" flaps located aft of the cowling. The flaps were a major design flaw for cooling these engines during takeoff. How do I know? My dad was a rear gunner and survived a crash on a B-29 during take-off on his third and final mission to Japan. It was an engine that seized up during takeoff that caused his crash.

@jimschutz Ай бұрын

As I look at these awesome engines history shows that the B-29 should have been designed with an inline liquid cooled motor just as the Lancaster bomber was. The P-51 had this as a fighter and became the dominant reason my dad survived and never had to engage the enemy on his tour of duty. The P-51 fighter escort cleared the way for my dad's first two bombing missions. Please feel free to comment!

@scottpecora371 26 күн бұрын

@@jimschutz also there weren't Pratt & Whitney engines their were the Wright R3350 Double compound, turbocharged Radial. The real problem was like the B29, the engines had also been rushed into service do to the needs of the war. Both plane and engines desperately need a couple more years for R&D and time to wring out all the bugs with what was the most complex plane built up to that time. Foot note, back in 1977 I got to sit in FiFi when it was at Arlington Texas at the Confederate Airforce. We spent a beautiful day Walking around photographing and sitting in most of the warlords they owned. I also go to sit in and photograph a Henkel HE-111 that had bombed London. It was a weekday and the museum was like a tomb that day and we had it to ourselves. Quite the experience at 15.

@lord_flashheart Ай бұрын

15:55 when the prop has 400 ping

@amyjojinkerson-b6o 2 ай бұрын

it took a lot to get those engines started

@wingmanjim6 24 күн бұрын

Fifi has Wright R3350s, not P&Ws, and those 3350s were most definitely NOT renowned for reliability at that stage of their development. Many B29s were lost due to engine fires and other failures, and they were generally disliked by their crews. In fact, Fifis 3350s are an amalgam of early and late series engine components to improve reliability.

@stealthfighter2923 2 ай бұрын

15 cylinder turbine engine? Um… no

@crushingvanessa3277 Ай бұрын

Seems to take so much to get a radial started. Hold this for that long, hold that for this long, flick that switch at this moment or you start all over. Do all this when an strafing attack was under way during wartime.

@SuperjumboAEVSPlanespotting 2 ай бұрын

B-29 engine is Wright R-3350-26 Duplex-Cyclone

@kenhanson4015 Ай бұрын

There are incongruities between the text and images shown.

@iqbalanwer7721 17 күн бұрын

somebody please tell this genius that Lycoming T53 is a jet engine and jet engines don't have bore or stroke and cylinders

@wickertwm 2 ай бұрын

The B-29 FiFi has 4 3350 Wright Engines, NOT Pratt and Whitney.

@leolino4 Ай бұрын

R-4360s on a C-47? Would they even fit?

@Sarah_Swede Ай бұрын

I not sure it could even haul it.🤣

@Fire21ccfd Ай бұрын

Yeah, I questioned that too. I've never seen a C-47 (in person or photo) with an engine that long.

@wickertwm 2 ай бұрын

The displacement of the R-3350 wass 3350 cid. The R-4360 by P&W had 4360 cid. It was used on the B-50 not the B-29.

@miked202069 Ай бұрын

Displacement of the R-2800 was 2804 CI,

@davelowets 2 күн бұрын

3:51.... Huh? The engines had about 3350c.i., NOT 4360c.i.. You are confusing the 18 cylinder 2-row R-3350 with the 28 cylinder 4-row R-4360.... In fact, the 2 engines weren't even made by the same companys. The 3350 was mfg by Wright, and the 4360 was mfg by Pratt&Whitney.

@AzTrailRider57 Ай бұрын

25:00 Umm.. this engine was in the C47? REALLY?

@flexyco Ай бұрын

Looking at the image before I press play. AI doesn't understand radials yet.

@davidmarkwort9711 2 ай бұрын

No BMW radial , no Junkers, no 602?

@patrickporter6536 2 ай бұрын

They're rarer than hen's teeth.

@wingmanjim6 24 күн бұрын

I'm no expert, but that Napier "knock" doesn't sound healthy !

@griseldamartinez8917 Ай бұрын

So is this part 2:38 of

@griseldamartinez8917 Ай бұрын

Wow it looks like the propeller is benting but is not 2:10

@oswaldoriginal5037 Ай бұрын

Just looking at these old motors, I wonder how people trust them to fly them in the sky, its seems to be dying all the time No wonder flying is so inefficient, these propellers have to do so much work just to carry the engine up into the sky

@DMPB-fi2ir Ай бұрын

18:06 lol ok since when does a turbine have cylinders it didnt have a bore and stroke ITS A JET ENGINE, the turbine compressor mass pressure was in the 7.4:1 and around 1100 shp. AS for the D suffix never seen it, series denotation for the civilian variant was T53L-11A where as the T53L-11 was the military. Still laughing bore stroke and number os cylinders for a jet turbine learn your engines and turbines you definetly have no clue what you are labeling . Not to mention numerous specs on engines and what they were used on are in error on many here.