Integrating the Lambert W Function | Interesting Integrals

  Рет қаралды 3,990

Xander Gouws

Xander Gouws

Күн бұрын

In this video, we cover a useful technique when integrating nested functions, and how to integrate the Lambert W function.
I haven't uploaded in a while for a couple of reasons. There've been a lot of administrative-type tasks (applying for University, citizenship, etc.) I'm planning on making an update/200 subscriber milestone video soon; just let you guys know what's going to happen in the future.
Further reading
=============
en.wikipedia.o...
en.wikipedia.o...
mathworld.wolfr...
Subscribe for more: goo.gl/yftKn4
Interesting Integrals playlist: • Interesting Integrals

Пікірлер: 32
@stefanosvasileiadis2732
@stefanosvasileiadis2732 5 жыл бұрын
Just saw your channel and already loved it! Just have a bonus exercise for the comment section. Prove that any concave function f:IR->(0, ∞) can't exist.
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! That's a great problem because it makes intuitive sense, but is kinda hard to put that into mathematical language.
@gabor6259
@gabor6259 5 жыл бұрын
blackpenredpen, Dr. Payem and Flammable Maths is like a Holy Trinity Of Math but you're slowly turning it into a "Quaternity".
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much :)
@SoppingWetDog
@SoppingWetDog 5 жыл бұрын
I can’t wait for the 200 sub special! When will you do a face reveal?? loved the vid btw
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
one day
@Patrick_BW
@Patrick_BW 5 жыл бұрын
@@XanderGouws Xander Gouws, you got 200 subs now can you please do a face reveal.
@OtiumAbscondita
@OtiumAbscondita 5 жыл бұрын
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
@MathForLife
@MathForLife 5 жыл бұрын
Nice video! I have a small question: at 1:43 you set y = W(x), why? You set before that y = ln(...), so evaluating int y dx = int W(x) dx.
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, at first we set it equal to the function inside the integral: y = ln(...), and then show that if we rearrange it, ln(...) = W(x). To go from "y * e^y = x" to "y = W(x)", we're just taking W of both sides. By the definition of W, W(y * e^y) = y.
@rot6015
@rot6015 5 жыл бұрын
This is great, subbed!
@rot6015
@rot6015 5 жыл бұрын
Came from flammable maths
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@PackSciences
@PackSciences 5 жыл бұрын
Why did you change from animated stuff to drawing equations? If I am not mistaken, this is the first time you do that, right? Bonus question: Top boundary: e^(1+e) = k W(k) = W(e*e^e) = e Bottom boundary: e = l W(l) = W(e) = 1 Top boundary: kW(k) - k + exp(W(k)) = e^(1+e)*e - e^(1+e) + e^e = (e^e)*e^2 - (e^e)*e + e^e = (e^e)*(e^2 - e + 1) Bottom boundary: lW(l) - l + exp(W(l)) = e*1 - e + e = e Integration leads to (e^e)*(e^2 - e + 1) - e
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
In terms of actual math writing, it's a lot quicker to draw it out than to animate the LaTeX. Just to be clear, I don't intend to ever *only* doing one or the other - in future videos, there'll be a mix of animations and blackboard-style stuff. And you got the bonus question right! I think it looks _cuter_ if you write it as "e^(e+2) - e^(e+1) + e^e - e", but your answer is definitely correct :p
@ayeshas6580
@ayeshas6580 5 жыл бұрын
Nice video! Btw how'd u learn stuff like this? From school or independent study?
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
All of the math that's either calculus or higher, I taught thanks to KZbin and some online notes. I think I might make a video on some useful resources, but idk. This problem, in particular, I actually came up with :)
@ayeshas6580
@ayeshas6580 5 жыл бұрын
@@XanderGouws I'd love to watch a video abt the resources you used because I'm trying to self study but don't really know where to start, and I have a lot of time on my hands rn :)
@romajimamulo
@romajimamulo 5 жыл бұрын
Couldn't you use the identity at the end to turn exp(w(x)) into x/(w(x))? Since x=w(x)×exp(w(x))
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
Yes! It's largely up to preference how you write it, but x/w(x) is definitely correct.
@romajimamulo
@romajimamulo 5 жыл бұрын
@@XanderGouws ah, the reason I would is that then you can factor out the X
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
@@romajimamulo yee
@fanyfan7466
@fanyfan7466 5 жыл бұрын
Romaji the only difference I can see is that e^w(x) is defined at x=0 (it is 1), while x/w(x) is not defined at x=0, but the limit as x -> 0 x/w(x) = 1 anyway so it’s probably not a big deal
@bobsno1fan783
@bobsno1fan783 5 жыл бұрын
When do you start your asmr channel?
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
I thought you fixed your sleep schedule?? :p
@ZombieLoverPlays
@ZombieLoverPlays 5 жыл бұрын
I understand about 70%... and the 30% that I don't understand is the most important shit. GG dumbass zombie xd Like the new style btw
@XanderGouws
@XanderGouws 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@ZombieLoverPlays
@ZombieLoverPlays 5 жыл бұрын
@@XanderGouws He's a Geo-Physicist. And im going for Computer Science (cuz that's not ironic at all xd)
@Emi-jh7gf
@Emi-jh7gf 5 жыл бұрын
Integrating Lambert W Function
12:59
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 53 М.
The Lambert W Function's Derivative
7:40
Flammable Maths
Рет қаралды 17 М.
She wanted to set me up #shorts by Tsuriki Show
0:56
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
-5+3은 뭔가요? 📚 #shorts
0:19
5 분 Tricks
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
e^x meets ln(x)
5:36
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 175 М.
The 7 Levels of Math Symbols
14:03
The Unqualified Tutor
Рет қаралды 2,5 М.
Calculus with the Lambert W Function
10:03
Physics and Math Lectures
Рет қаралды 9 М.
calling of the Luna (full pack)
10:30
CinemaAny
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Lambert W Taylor Series Expansion [ Lagrange Inversion Theorem ]
9:38
Flammable Maths
Рет қаралды 29 М.
I Computed An Integral That Breaks Math
4:20
BriTheMathGuy
Рет қаралды 648 М.
Series Representation of the Lambert W Function
14:03
Physics and Math Lectures
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Lambert W Function
14:35
Prime Newtons
Рет қаралды 702 М.
She wanted to set me up #shorts by Tsuriki Show
0:56
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН