Video Animation: Mark Bohr Gets Small: 22nm Explained | Intel

[@maximillionboi]

imagine being that chill after your shrink ray malfunctions

[@eliassjogreen5817]

4:04 Quality intel cooler right there

[@GameHardYT]

Lol

[@lillyrook]

This was extremely adorable and informative at the same time. Geeky cuteness goes a long way!

[@outofthebox9699]

Now a days we have 4nm transistors.

[@Costinmusca]

I wonder if he's made it home yet... or at least made it to the next floor tile.

[@samuelajayi3748]

he just made it to the door 2 years after lol

[@chaitanyakhatri573]

He just made it to the dining table after 2 years😂😂

[@godsend8196]

I don't think he did

[@yourfriend5144]

He did not leave the building yet

[@t2trix1]

2024 now, he's probably still on the first tile...

[@WheatleyOS]

such a cheesy ending lol

[@LucasRibeiro-po4pb]

"Large unindentifiable object to my left" *Identifies it*

[@Jules.11011]

Well, it was unidentified up until that moment. He was not wrong.

[@IRBitterSoB]

So, you can do 22nm, but can't swing 1080p? :P

[@adityasinghkshatri2199]

Is this some kind of illiterate joke I'm too literate to understand

[@ProblemanMx]

@@adityasinghkshatri2199 no, you are just not paying attention.

[@n0id34]

What did I learn from this. Intel - "Our stuff breaks down right when you need it most."

[@samk6170]

The cheesiness reminds me of the 90's, lel.

[@rageagainstthebath]

There was like 20 seconds of info in this clip that I didn't know yet, but I'm a trained electronics engineer. Still it's nice to learn about new technology, and I'm glad it's explained in the way that at least half of the world would get it. Good job, Intel, I'm your big fan, despite you didn't hire me. ;)

[@vlada881]

And 9 years later you are still on 14nm.

[@tmsteph1290]

watching this now in 2024, didn't they just announce 3d microchips again?

[@TheONEHD1762]

oh man, thank you so much. this is the only source, i could understand the principal function of the finfet and why it is so much better than mosfet

[@sagarpuri7838]

That 22nm has changed to 3nm

[@DanielWillen]

Why don't they just make transistors that are based on light. Why are they still messing around with electrons when photons are clearly the future?

[@stormq8]

he looks like the brain from "pinky and the brain"

[@dennihsaur]

sounds like him too. hmmmmmm

[@borgholable]

dude this is honestly completely mind blowing , i dont think the childish way the presented this respects the pure magic that intel or any cpu manufacturer does

[@saulmtzglz]

Awesome video ! I love it. To me this is about “what” they do , I’d love to see the “how” they do it. Can’t imagine how the machines to do the prehistoric transistors have been evolved to become the Integrated Circuits, then to the single layer microprocessors and now this 3D chips

[@outofthebox9699]

Now a days we have 4nm transistors.

[@saxoman1]

Photolithography!

[@AuDHDarling]

The precision of that shrink ray is AMAZING. It can hit him but not the chip in his hand. Flawless.

[@Mycha31]

@SlowDownSmutty Well, that particular chip he had in his hand will be outdated, but the 3D transistor technology will be used for a long while.

[@FelipeMalagon6758]

Thank u

[@lancerudy9934]

Great video thanks 😊

[@mr_underscore5320]

Just imagining how do they make these crashes my brain.

[@arianitzejnullahu1921]

Mr_ Underscore I feel with you😂

[@Ken-no5ip]

The percision is unreal

[@saxoman1]

Photolithography!

[@ricohl88]

This video totally blows my mind! I need to work for intel.

[@thebest545]

Do they have an official release date yet?

[@waltuhindagoog5523]

4:04 will be another bruh moment

[@staffordbiggs4966]

Great need to plan for the future

[@มดแดง-ฃ3ข]

intel ford มือถือเป็นเบอร์ 1 ใน CPU จะทำตลาดหางวัยรุ่นไปหน่อยAMD เขานำเสนอภาพเกมที่น่าตื่นตาตื่นใจ

[@TheValiantZero]

Please make more of these!

[@amayahirano1710]

"Senior Intel Fellow" Okay, Intel, I'll be taking that rank now. :>

[@Whiteboykun]

"we don't hire boat fuckers." -intel

[@shabbarali4020]

Awesome.

[@fazlayelahi29]

Thank you for explaining in amazingly easy language....!!

[@wowcolors]

You should hire the engineering guy to explain this

[@MrPyroCrab]

This is the greatest video I have ever watched in my entire life.

[@NathanChisholm041]

you don't get out much do you?

[@MrPyroCrab]

You don't have much of a sense of sarcasm do you?

[@Zhiphr]

How does the transistor know when to allow current and when not to allow current?

[@elraver]

I love you, technology.

[@vanillaportal]

Great video! good information and interesting script. love it!

[@ffsource]

Nice video, nice explanation.

[@ob1kanukie]

SICK!!! 14NM chipset by 2014?!

[@unexpecteditem7919]

Yeah! And also, for the next 7 years...

[@ozymandias949]

@@unexpecteditem7919 lmao. Meanwhile at IBM they invented a 2nm process.

[@jonap1st]

AMD and NVIDIA should start learning making videos from Intel, instead bitching the others, Intel show us truly meaning of new technology with some nice presentation. I think i'm in love with Mark Bohr :)

[@DripGxd_Cam]

Oh boy how the times have changed

[@zeroframeB]

@abdelrrazak its said to be in the Ivy Bridge which would be the socket 1366 equal to the old 1156/1366 socket, right now the 1155 socket is in the mid end of cpu's like the old 1156 was and the new socket for ivy bridge will be the high performace and workstation/server cpu's like the 1366 socket was

[@HowToGuys]

Incredible!!! 3d transistor...

[@rionix88]

wow this vid is 11 yrs old.. amazing

[@Petrov3434]

Beautifully done and witty - great

[@marcelloID]

Great video, very informative and clear delivery. Thanks!!!!!

[@michaelrh2008]

Nothing can be 22,000 times smaller, since 1 times smaller is 0! It can be 1/22000th of the previous size, but it cannot be >1 times smaller.

[@KonsKoehler5]

dear people of Intel, my homie and I are gonna start our own transitor/cmos company today. so if u want us stop what we are doing, we can negotiate.. happy aifb week, KF-Solutions

[@Ultrapro011]

LMAO do you think they really care

[@TheWeepingCorpse]

I wanted this video to go on forever.

[@BitesHisTail]

MIND..BLOWN...

[@Shevayeb]

@abduman3 its the transistors that are smaller, not the chip

[@FoxGhost7]

Wow, fantastic. Mad props to the Intel engineers :-)

[@outofthebox9699]

Now a days we have 4nm transistors.

[@JBlongz]

@ShadowwwLFS We will see. They only customized Arm chips because they needed better power management and size. With trigate offering 3x the data flow at lower power and smaller, I dont see how they will resist as Apple prefers partnerships over spreading themselves too thin.

[@jackwalsh1598]

Fair Juice, you made a technically complex and deep topic….. Fun.

[@Le_Sourpuss]

He looks like that short guy from the Lone Gunmen. Cool video!

[@cosmicpuma1409]

Watching this in 2021....makes this even more mindblowingly awesome!! Wow!! #respect

[@heavymetaldeath4life]

It's amazing that we're able to construct and operate at such a smaller scale, nanotechnology can be used to do extraordinary things, well extraordinary to us. I wonder what the future holds for us....

[@hyperspaced77]

Very nice video. Bravo Intel.

[@illlanoize23]

I was like why the camera zoomed out so much and then was like oh they had to bring out the shrink ray

[@shalbsb]

Really like the video, love complex things in simple words. Now I Wanna see this guy walk his way out of this chip. Have a nice 1 Billion transistor walk.

[@outofthebox9699]

Now a days we have 4nm transistors.

[@shalomnoronha5477]

No kidding when he says hes a bohr

[@tonyblackops]

How do you guys do these awesome stuff ?

[@pro3455255]

mark bohr is the great grandson of niels bohr, danish phisicist who discovered discreet quantum energy that the electron has when it leap from one level to the other by absorbing a photon. the formula is E=hf h= planck constant f= frequency of the radiation of the photon

[@productfeedback]

Humor and informative, awesome video

[@ivanjesik]

hmmm, here are my questions :-) 1) must be source drain and gate in this block form? or is also possible another (more sides) formation for better performance? 2) is possible also multi tri-gate solution for one transistor? thank you :-)

[@outofthebox9699]

Now a days we have 4nm transistors.

[@ElChileGrande]

@tungah Did you figure that out the moment it broke?

[@akzy]

Moores law states the number of transistors per unit area will double every 2 years. So in 2015 it will be 5.5nm. However this cannot go on indefinetly, a single atom is about .5nm, and these transistors have to use a few of 'em. So it's believed the furthest Moores law can sustain itself is until 2015 :(

[@TroyOi]

At 2:40, Mr. Bohr states that the transistor has the ability to switch on and off at "100 billion times a second". That's 100GHz! (And that's just the old planar transistor -- not the new 3D one!) If that's the case, why do current processor speeds max out at about 4GHz? Is it a matter of having to operate transistors well below their physical limits due to power and thermal concerns?

[@TroyOi]

Are you sure? It sounds like you're talking about asynchronous circuitry, and that's not the way CPUs work these days.

[@96ace96]

I think it's a problem with heat. Removing so much heat requires some serious cooling mechanisms. They can, but its not efficient. I think the highest clock speed we have gotten to is something close to 9GHz, and that used liquid nitrogen.

[@Annihilator49]

You are correct. There are certain delay times that must be met in order for the chip to work properly. Like you mentioned, modern CPUs are extremely sequential in their operation, so in order to determine the maximum frequency for a clock speed in a system you would calculate the maximum delay through your circuit. These are extremely simple calculations that just involve adding up the delay times of the gates, and a number of other things such as "clock to q delay", the amount of time for a clock signal's effect to reach the output of the flip flop. Not all paths through a CPU take the same amount of time, so you would have something called a "critical path" which means slowest path basically, and you would generally want all paths to take that amount of time to avoid timing errors and race conditions, where some things are faster than others. A signal inside a CPU, or any digital system, has two factors called setup and hold time. The amount of time the signal needs in order to change from 1 to 0, or 0 to 1, and the amount of time the signal needs to remain at a certain value to be recognized respectively. These setup and hold times are sometimes variable, and when setup and hold times are violated the system will not necessarily stop working, but it may lose stability, because if the circuit doesn't have enough time to setup its possible that if the voltage were to change slightly or the temperature were to increase or decrease around the system, the signal might not be read correctly. This is why overclocking exists. A certain amount of setup and hold time are allotted to ensure absolute validity of the signals in worst case scenarios, and people using these products can decide or determine what scenario they are working in and if they care enough or not, and to weigh the pros and cons of this violation. Again, you were absolutely correct in your assumptions and you had an excellent question. CPUs are extremely sequential in their circuitry, with lots of flip flops and lots of steps, which creates extremely long critical paths that affect their clock speeds. Some Devices like FPGAs have Transceivers designed specifically for sending and receiving data, and some of these devices can clock at speeds of 32 GHz and beyond because they are designed with very short critical paths and they maintain parallel operation. I hope this answers your question!

[@TroyOi]

Thanks, Peter!

[@C1nnam0n09]

You're explanation is clear, thank you Sir.

[@ShiroKage009]

It looks as if the image on the "ground" is a single-atom resolution graph of a bunch of transistors.

[@zokocx]

Nice video, and enough educational to any average computer geek understands it.

[@NickRoman]

It's funny how all that explanation (including as much that I had already read) went into what they showed us in a few seconds with the "gate" turning into a fin. It's also rather underwhelming as far as change goes, but that suggests that the really interesting part might actually be how they do it. They had been using a photographic etching type of process. I wonder what about that process has changed. Now what about 3D processors (as opposed to just transistors)?

[@inlovewithi]

I liked this video. Some of the effects could have been better done, but I liked that it kind of showed how some things work.

[@haterzwilhate]

where can i buy that shrinker machine?

[@stuffstuffa]

that is the best video I've ever seen.

[@gobi752]

@izlude2 see the video carefully, 3d in the sense gate or control switch wraps around substrate or conducting wire instead of just sitting on it like in 2d. Imagine having magnets in all directions to attract an iron nail, instead of just one strong magnet in one direction. Replace magnet with gate/switch and nail with current and you have your explanation !!

[@LeoBienDurana]

Great one Intel :)

[@Mr_i_o]

My pants are [enters coordinates] - and I am to be proportional to the circuit. (end of lecture)

[@TheDrGravy]

Oh, wow, thanks for clearing that up, I wasn't too sure if it was real or not.

[@sundhaug92]

The problem would be to evenly distribute the heat throughout a fully 3D chip, think for example a cube

[@efern211]

Awesome! Great Video! Intel rules! Thanks for all the great technology over the years. Much love!

[@outofthebox9699]

Now a days we have 4nm transistors.

[@chis5050]

intel needs to get back to these days

[@dhimanroy2831]

What if the current channel width is increased ?

[@dancingfrogsxb1276]

10 years ago, where are we now 🤯

[@FastFrameGaming]

They shrink all their employees before serving lunch :) 22nm Lunch !

[@Neel-1]

Amazing how humans can manufacture something so small on such a large scale with an almost 100% success rate.

[@MHLoppy]

the "defeat" tune at the end is in Metal Knights lol

[@punnkypo]

damn, this is crazy how this stuff works

[@Rayne_van]

i was looking up how to get to sleep and somehow got to here.....this did it XD

[@pamsing3012]

To funny

[@msbalzgiip7365]

This guy is the best at acting in the world. Funniest jokes i ever seen.

[@ROXcursed]

Great video. Very informative.

[@TheMagicToyChest]

Its kind of funny realizing that one of their transistors is around 20x smaller than one wave of the color red.

[@deadist]

0:09 Can i PLEASE put all those in my computer?

[@youhackforme]

I will take that as a compliment to the maker.

[@ivanjesik]

i've been thinkin' about optical transistors for optical 3D chip. but this info about tri-gate 3D transistor for 3D chips has surprised me in good way :-)

[@n3rdbear]

On a serious note, how the hell do they create such small transistors at a very small scale, do they draw it on a canvas then sprinkle metallic parts on it until it takes shape or what? because there's no robotic hands out there that small. That is some serious alien technology.

[@fantasygamer32]

Nice video !

[@Jaeywa]

0:32 the reason why they stay at 14 nm

[@sniped101]

intel will have these out within this year.. How long will it at UNSW?

[@technoman9000]

@tungah It was actually probably designed by Boeing under a contract from the Department of Defense, and cost 500 million dollars.

[@real82it]

Game changer.....experts now put Intel 3-4 years ahead of the competition. What does this mean to you......smaller form factors (phones, tablets) with the same or more computing power and longer battery life. Can't wait.....

[@polxhaferi6671]

Why not put an insulator between two electron currents so you can double the performance ?

[@screaminpman]

Notice the length of this video--4:20. Coincidence? I think not. 420 is a part of Intel corporate culture. True story! Okay, maybe not, but very cool video, Intel!