iPhone is like a song in MP3 format, lower quality but a lot more convenient and versatile (and cheaper). Dedicated camera is like a CD or vinyl, much higher (sound) quality but requires setup and knowledge to operate properly in order to accentuate its full potential. For most of the people, MP3 is a better choice.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Wow, superb breakdown. Thanks Tony
@tonytaoxКүн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance you are welcome. Sorry about the grammar as I was typing while running on a treadmill 😅😅. Love your work! Subscribed!
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Thanks Tony, good for you!
@TheNeighborDominatorКүн бұрын
I just bought the 16 pro max. I have the lumix s5ii and I’m contemplating on selling my rig and just using the iPhone. The content that I make this is all I really need. Great video as always Joe
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Hey there, yes it all depends on what you’re using it for. Sometimes smaller is better. Thank you
@CorentinHarbelotКүн бұрын
I have exactly the same feeling, and same gear...
@TheNeighborDominatorКүн бұрын
@@CorentinHarbelot are you using s5ii
@CorentinHarbelotКүн бұрын
@@TheNeighborDominator Yes
@TheNeighborDominatorКүн бұрын
@CorentinHarbelot i do lawncare content and soon golf content. I feel for the lawn I can get away with the phone. Using my macro is nice for up close with the Lumix. The phones start to look like trash up close. But I could sell my gear and get a good amount back because it is relevant still. I do love the Lumix S5ii too though. Im torn. Do you make content
@frenchfries8745Күн бұрын
Of course a6700 is better but the point is how much better or to what point iphone still usable specially when light get dimmer. Subscribed
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Yes that low light is where the iPhone 16 Pro starts to fall apart and the Sony a6700 shines
@davidvillarraga2449Күн бұрын
i have the sony A6700 and i can say that is perfet, i love it
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Hey David, Yes I really enjoy mine.
@KnzoofficialКүн бұрын
Bro i have been looking for Iphone 16 pro raw footage so i can test it in my color grading scheme through my workflow before i bought it and you just saved my life, that you for providing footage that we can see for ourselves how it is in our own work flow, i repeat, THANK YOU! Subscriber earned!
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
It’s my pleasure, enjoy. I have a bunch of downloads from the iPhone 16 Pro from different videos as well. Your free to use all of them
@KnzoofficialКүн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance Thank you, they're also in apple log right? not only standard? (i haven't gone to the website yet that is why i am asking)
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Yes both, standard and apple log
@parthapal333Күн бұрын
I have sonyzve10 and iphone13. But as a regular person(not a photographer), I rarely carry the camera and almost always record with iphone. But in studio environment, I feel like camera is more convenient to use in a tripod and studio light.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
This is a great point. Yes studio shots will require the dedicated camera like the Sony a6700 whereas everyday shooting the iPhone 16 Pro will do just fine.
@dimasstore4047Күн бұрын
how much different is the photo/video quality of an iPhone from a sony camera?
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
It depends on the lighting environment
@jermainehayes1961Күн бұрын
My local camera store was having a promotion combo this past weekend that brought the A6700 drto $1,050 for the body only. I had to leave the store before I walked out with it, to keep the G.A.S. at bay.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Oh man, that’s a pretty good deal
@LensnthrottleКүн бұрын
Awesome comparison. This is what I was looking for. Very well explained. I was about to get a6700. Then iphone 16 launched. I liked iPhone color science over 6700. And with apple prores I think I will go with i phone for my styles of content creation.Thank you 🙏🏼
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Hey there, good idea. Sounds like you got it figured out
@DesoloZantas21 сағат бұрын
Professionals can tell the difference. Average consumers cannot. It's because professionals know what they're looking for. Average consumers and just want an image that looks nice.
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Thank you. This is my point and I appreciate you summarizing. Do you shoot professionally or as a hobby and could you see a difference Between the iPhone 16 Pro and the Sony a6700?
@jaymills1720Күн бұрын
Always top notch! There is nothing holding someone back from making excellent YT videos using the iPhone 16. It’s preference and $$$
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Hi Jay, can't agree more. Thanks for your input. Did you buy the iPhone 16 Pro?
@jaymills1720Күн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance I did! Sold an a7s3 and bit ago and am XT5. OP3 and iPhone 16 pro covers my needs for work as a teacher, and travel/personal. Never needing to fiddle with lenses and a large physical footprint makes me film more. Love the log !
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Good stuff, easy, portable and powerful image quality.
@Govardhan_OutdoorsКүн бұрын
Which is the best outdoor cooking video shoot camera and lens bro budget 200k.. please pick my comment bro.!
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Thats actually a very common question I get. I understand because I was in your shoes at one point in my camera journey. To help people find the perfect camera, I created a ‘Which Camera Should I Buy?’ course and a free quiz. They might be helpful resources for you as you weigh your options.
@drewmilwahkee17473 сағат бұрын
Dof on the piano shot 100% gave it away
@drewmilwahkee17473 сағат бұрын
If you can get close enough then yes you cant tell the difference ie the violin shot. Or if you take wide shots ie the city shot then sure but the moment you dont get close enough for the tiny sensor on the iphone to create seperation you can tell. Still looks good. I think this is why iphone works for travel. You are mostly taking wide sprawling shots of mountains or twirly shots on the beach. You cant tell in those scenarios because it doesnt require that background seperation
@JayfkProductions876Күн бұрын
A Dedicated camera is better with less limitations & compromises, & u have lens options. Having recently got into the Apple eco system the compromises are pretty damn annoying.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Yes, I hear you. Have you downloaded any third party camera apps?
@JayfkProductions876Күн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance always been a Filmic user on Android, but I don't like unnecessary subscriptions so maybe I'll try something else However getting into the Apple ecosystem was more bcoz of the M1 Max MacBook Pro & less bcoz of IPhone, Main camera is a Sony Zv E10
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Ok cool. Also I’ve heard great things about the google pixel 9. So many choices!
@andrewcaffrey968022 сағат бұрын
I had this exact decision a month ago. I ended up choosing the a6700 for one main reason: zoom. I just wanted the flexibility for photos and videos. If you’re outside the installed lenses the iphone has, the digital zoom is often disappointing
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Yes exactly. Here’s the million dollar question. Now that you’ve seen this video, are you happy with your decision?
@andrewcaffrey968011 сағат бұрын
@@thefilmalliance you know, im still always amazed by how good iphone cameras can be and you really showcased it. In the end the a6700 just has higher potential and was exactly what i needed. And that’s always the thing, get what you need! If a phone is enough, then they’re pretty damn good! Thanks for the reply and the video, you really helped me see a lot of products and hone in what i wanted
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
Nice I’m happy I was able to help. Also, the stabilization in the iPhone 16 Pro is way better which is a huge plus
@gordon398812 сағат бұрын
This was very well done! I guessed correctly which was which, largely as the iPhone looks good, but a camera just a bit better. Frankly, I think the iPhone looks closer to real life whereas the camera looks perhaps more movie like. I find now that my iPhone is always with me (not as a camera…but it does get that role too..especially for quick photos), but for photos and video I I carry an action camera and a small camera (in my case a Sony Rx100vii) and I’m set. The Sony largely for its Zoom, the action for vlogging and poor weather and the iPhone for quick shots I might want to share easily. Everything takes up almost no room and so light. The reason I can see for a ‘proper’ camera these days is for the art side or for great zoom needs (wildlife is one example). If you really enjoy taking photos (or video) as a hobby, somewhat pixel peep or need it for artistic uses (e.g. wedding or other pro services) a camera and lenses are a great way to go. Otherwise a set up like mine (choose your own small camera of preference) is close to perfect, especially if you just post on social media. My ‘real’ mirrorless LUMIX camera rarely gets any use, unless for studio work..just too big when you add lenses. That said, for my use case I keep looking for another that is small (lenses too) and relatively light and the 6700 is on the list. Ideally a camera and maybe (?) two lenses for a total of 1.1kg or so.
@thefilmalliance12 сағат бұрын
That's awesome that you were able to identify the footage from each camera. I agree, the iPhone's color science a lot of times looks very true-to-life in program auto. It's super interesting to hear how you've got your camera setup dialed in for different situations. That's really the key, isn't it? Having the right tool for the job, and it sounds like you've figured that out. I'm always curious to see what Sony can do to pack amazing performance into a smaller body with the Sony a6700 compared to how Apple does it. Thanks for the comment
@carolebriggs5280Күн бұрын
I have the iPhone 15 pro. It does take amazing photos. I’m really considering getting the a6700. Can’t decide on lenses. The Sigma 18-50/2.8 you recommended is $520. Yikes. Maybe I’ll just stick with my Sony Rx10 iv. It does great and no lenses to buy!
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
I know - that lens is expensive, but man the difference between that and the kit lens is substantial. So yes, I'd say stick with the RX10 iv for now until you save up for that Sony a6700 paired with a good lens. No need for you to pickup the iPhone 16 Pro
@carolebriggs5280Күн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance thanks for the quick reply! I can swing that Sigma. The question is, do I want to. But, I’ll probably do it. I wasn’t sure about what lens to get. Do I need any primes too? I appreciate the info! New subscriber fan 😀
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
I'd say no on the primes for now. Not until you are using the Sony a6700 for an actual use case. The Sigma will take you 95% of the way for most stuff.
@kbarrett1844Күн бұрын
Pretty active content creator with iPhone since the 4s - iPhones are great, but they're not a replacement for dedicated cameras. I have both and use both - Different situations demand different tools.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Good point and I’m right there with you
@JewieSeinfeld3 сағат бұрын
Can you please drop some video of some post processing?? Would love to see how you clean up the vids and take it to the next level? plus FX …. 🙏🏼
@IOS.mobileКүн бұрын
Great comparison! As expected, the a6700 edged out the iPhone when pixel peeping. The average person is amazed at the quality of images coming from the iPhone. At this point, iPhone has proved itself in almost every category. They are even shooting a $75million feature film on iPhone. In my mind, when they make iPhone work with a flash trigger, it's game over!
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Oh wow, really? I didn’t know that. Thats crazy
@eweelyliemberg923719 сағат бұрын
When comparing the quality of devices like the Sony A6700 and the iPhone 16 Pro Max, it's essential to take advantage of the maximum capabilities of each device to get a fair comparison. Using the most advanced color formats and profiles offered by each device, such as S-Log3/Gamut3 on the Sony A6700 and ProRes 422 with Apple Log on the iPhone 16 Pro Max, will allow both to reach their full potential in terms of dynamic range, color gradation, and detail. Additionally, by capturing at 60 fps on both devices, an equivalence in fluidity and sharpness in shots with movement is ensured, which is relevant in video comparisons. Using these advanced profiles and formats also gives room to compare the editing capacity in post-production, since both S-Log3 and Apple Log are designed to retain as much color and exposure information as possible from their respective sensors. That would be the REAL AND FAIR comparison to demonstrate which has better quality, color, and texture in the image regardless of the bokeh. I compared the iPhone 14 Pro Max's main camera (1x) in ProRes 422 with Rec. 2020 at 30fps against the Sony ZV-E10 in S-Log3/Gamut3 at 30fps, using the sharpest equivalent Sony APS-C lens (Sony E 15mm f/1.4 G SEL15F14G). The Sony ZV-E10 was slightly better in sharpness, likely due to the quality of the lens. When zoomed in to 400x, sharpness was noticeably better on the Sony. Additionally, the Sony ZV-E10 showed greater detail in the shadows, which was evidence of its superior dynamic range. The difference was more noticeable in dynamic range than in detail and sharpness. The Sony also demonstrated better colorimetry thanks to the Gamut3 profile, which outperforms Rec. 2020 in this regard. In conclusion, the ZV-E10 has slightly superior texture and sharpness to the iPhone, but stands out notably for its dynamic range in the shadows. A real comparison of the maximum capacity of the Sony a6700 Slog3/Gamut3 XAVC S-I (4:2:2, 10-bit) 59.94p (600Mbps) with the Sony E 15mm f/1.4 G SEL15F14G lens vs iPhone 16 Pro Max ProRes 422/Apple Log 60p would be very interesting. That would be a fair comparison. Correct exposure for S-Log3 (IRE 41 for mid-grey 18%) generally requires slightly overexposing compared to Apple Log, as Apple Log (IRE 38 for mid-grey 18%). This should also be taken into account for a fair comparison.
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Your specifications would give a highly accurate comparison although most people are open the box and film people. And most of those people shoot in program auto. You are an expert and although that would be a great way to test, I believe it would only interest me, you and a few others. This video is more for your average Joe. The Sony e 15mm plus a6700 puts you over $2k. So that would be a tough one
@eweelyliemberg9237Сағат бұрын
@@thefilmalliance You are absolutely right. But it would be interesting. Your video is also very well structured for a common user and I did like it.
@productguru832315 сағат бұрын
iPhone 16 is really great, and good enough for most situations for most people!
@thefilmalliance14 сағат бұрын
Can’t agree more. Did you pickup the iPhone 16 Pro ?
@fifthgear93Күн бұрын
I know you always compare iPhones to real cameras since the iPhone has historically had the best video capabilities on the smartphone market, but this years Google Pixel 9 Pro shows some really impressive results when using the Video Boost feature which uses AI to enhance the video. I cannot stress this enough, the video out of the Pixel is amazing. Maybe you should include it next time you do a smartphone vs real camera comparison video.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
This is great advice, I’m looking into it now
@iamakkkshayКүн бұрын
There is a huge bug in apple LOG when shooting with pro manual camera settings via Blackmagic app, the issue is that the white clipping point for Apple LOG is not constant for lower ISO values which shifts the histogram to left and crushes the shadow details and even make False Colour and Highlights Clipping Lights useless as at base 55 ISO the footage clips at about 60-70 IRE instead of 95 IRE which is there when using Auto ISO/Shutter speed setting or using Manual settings only above ISO 1250. This uneven white clipping point in LOG even affects the LUT and reduce the overall dynamic range of the sensor at base ISO of 55. Majority of sensor Analog gain is available only till ISO 400 as rest of it is just digital gain adding up which reduces the signal to noise ratio of image as you go higher. Seems Apple designed LOG only to be used in auto exposure mode via stock camera app with tons of Baked in Noise Reduction.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
This was informative. I do see a lot of noise in that lower ISO range and deduced it was from the sensor size. But now that you mention it I see what you're saying. Great point and addition to the conversation. Appreciate it
@Gamesthetic99Күн бұрын
i really love your content keep it up
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Thank you, much appreciated
@dronephotogeek6 сағат бұрын
If your a girl just buy an iPhone and get a bunch of simps to follow you and if your a dude buy the Sony
@michaelkus886950 минут бұрын
😂
@-441-Күн бұрын
Nice to see my baby a6700 still holding up!! 😅😅😅😅
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
And holding up well I might add
@freepadz62415 сағат бұрын
Iphone has that chintzy digital video look. The a6700 just looks perfect.
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
You’ve got a good eye. I think most people wouldn’t notice though
@ahdam82Күн бұрын
Joe keep up the excellent work you have motivated me and educated me dramatically! I knew nothing about videography and now I am extremely comfortable navigating over the Sony platform being able to quickly make adjustments on the fly. I appreciate all your videos.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
I really appreciate this feedback. Thanks for watching my videos. I’m happy you’re comfortable with your Sony. It’s my pleasure to make these videos for you all. Thanks again
@monstrositydnbКүн бұрын
Would love to see you conpare it with the iphone using something like freewell lenses on there and seeing the difference then.
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Ah, good idea. Now I need to get my hands on some free well lenses for the iPhone 16 Pro. Have you ever used external lenses on the outside of the iPhone? It loses its portability aspect.
@freepadz62415 сағат бұрын
Now do iphone 16 vs a6700 vs a7cii! Phone vs apsc vs full frame.
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
Oh wow, nice one
@mattlau19 сағат бұрын
Smartphones are getting so much better and it'll always have the advantage of convenience, which for the majority, is the most important factor.
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Every year, I’m surprised the steps they take forward. Could you tell me your overall preference between the iPhone 16 Pro and the Sony a6700?
@mattlau11 сағат бұрын
@@thefilmalliance the iPhone 16 hands down. Photography and videography is a hobby for me, so the a6700 isn’t necessary for my needs.
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
Okay, happy you figured it out
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
Glad you figured it out
@yrjobenson15 сағат бұрын
Good comparision, thanks!
@thefilmalliance14 сағат бұрын
Thank you
@travelexplorer14 сағат бұрын
I am about to buy the iphone 16 pro and is not because the camera, is about the data transfer from my cf card to my ssd, with out the need of computer
@thefilmalliance14 сағат бұрын
That’s an excellent reason why to pickup the iPhone 16 Pro. Thanks for the input
@marumarukira42 минут бұрын
can't believe people are still confused about this or even having a hard time to decide. obviously what's better or right for you is based on use case scenario. no way in hell people would pick a phone camera for video/photo purposes only. if you have to pick one and does not have a phone that can't handle your day to day task. then go for the phone. if your phone is working fine for what's intended to be based on your lifestyle, go for the dedicated camera.... this is like, should I pick a Ferrari for my commute to work or Toyota Corolla?
@Joh146Күн бұрын
It might be equal if you are filming but If you take photography seriously the gap to iPhone is big. Lowlight, Milkyway, real macro, big prints, landscape in most cases the iPhone can't compete for rea.l
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Hey Joh, all true. Both cameras are for different use cases. The iPhone 16 Pro is my everyday carry and the Sony a6700 is my specific needs camera. Which was your favorite?
@Joh14613 сағат бұрын
@@thefilmalliance I´m using the A6400 but I´m planing to upgrade to the A6700 soon.
@thefilmalliance12 сағат бұрын
I love the a6400s color science. But I must admit that the Sony a6700 has a lot better functionality. Hey maybe you could keep your a 6400 as a b-cam.
@Joh14611 сағат бұрын
@@thefilmalliance No, one camera is enough for me and I can only justify the buy of the A6700 only with the sell of the A6400.
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
Okay, I hear you. Don’t forget a good lens!
@samsak1239Күн бұрын
How does the ZV E10 Mk 2 do against the iPhone 16 Pro. I'm curious to know.
@tori4267Күн бұрын
zv e10 mk2 is pretty much the same as a6700 but without ibis and ai auto focus
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Video coming soon
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
You pretty much summed it up
@joseprada7728Күн бұрын
Excited for that one
@kylinblueКүн бұрын
@@tori4267better microphone, more compact, and much cheaper. I own both ❤
@zekirami114519 сағат бұрын
if view your photo on your 4k tv u will see that any camera is better than any smart phone
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Yes great point. But most people view it on their phones. So, which camera did you like better? The iPhone 16 Pro orSony a6700 ?
@zekirami11456 сағат бұрын
@@thefilmalliance i have fuji xh2 and canon 5r i think the sony better than any smart phone i just feel that smart phone a fake photos 😁😁
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
Oh nice, yes I hear ya. The larger the screen the more the iPhone 16 Pro will fall apart
@khoifotoКүн бұрын
When I'm not working, I always have a small Sony A6700 and a 16mm sigma in my bag.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Good choice. Small but powerful.
@nilpatel9096Күн бұрын
15:53 lol
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
I know, no rear flip screen so didn’t know that happened until I watched playback
@Metro6am9 сағат бұрын
My iPhone does weird sharpening on my skin in photos , also no flip out screen so it’s a nightmare to film yourself. I gave up and bought an S9.
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
I know what you mean. I wish we could shoot photos in raw with the iPhone 16 Pro
@BrasilOO7Күн бұрын
If you want to take pictures of moving subjects or in low light conditions... forget the smartphone...
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
This is a great point !
@zakiradi45013 сағат бұрын
Very disappointed with the colour grading and quality you have extracted out of A6700. It’s so much better than that. Still indoors the difference was visible.
@thefilmalliance12 сағат бұрын
Please explain what you mean. I was matching color science to show it’s possible to have an a-can b-cam setup
@Rliel2009Күн бұрын
Do you have any plans to do the same comparison with Sony ZV-E10 II or it's the same as with iPhone 15 pro you did already?
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
I already shot a ZV-E10 II vs the iPhone 16 Pro video. It's currently being edited and scheduled to come out in about 1 month.
@pw4780Сағат бұрын
Looking at your comparison, iPhone 16 Pro is producing better images.
@kylinblueКүн бұрын
Should’ve made the comparison between 16 pro and zv e10 mk2
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Thats coming
@kylinblueКүн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance reminder to do mic comparisons. Love your vids.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Thanks okay will do
@risket6617Күн бұрын
At 16:41, a6700 lose focus while the eye of subject is still visible. I thought a6700 AF was able to handle situation like this (another object cover eye of main subject). Have you turn on subject recognition to human? I just about to buy one so this make me doubt about "superior AF" that eb is refer to Sony newest model
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Great point and good eye. I had center focus on and it briefly locked in on the violin once the violin crossed the center. If I was using wide as my focus area, it should’ve stayed locked on his eye.
@risket6617Күн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance wow lightning fast reply. Thanks a lot, it helped me to decide. Appreciate your dedication for beginners like me with these comparison vids.
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
happy to hear I can help
@paulliddement18 сағат бұрын
Image quality comes from a good sensor. The best sensors can shoot moving subjects in lowish light. Good sensors can also shoot with flexibility in the edit suite, smartphone editing is computational rather than data driven. It’s smart interpretation. Like the matrix making everything taste like chicken. Smartphones fall apart in shooting scenarios like I.e in the house with 40w lights on. Smartphones have tiny sensors and will never replace mirrored cameras. Smartphones are terrible in low light and moving subjects. They use computational photography which looks okish on a small screen but once you zoom in they all look terrible. Not many reviewers will zoom in I find KZbin very one sided in favour of the iPhone just due to the Apple shoulder rub.
@thefilmalliance14 сағат бұрын
Apple shoulder rub? I bought with own money. I believe tone mapping is what you’re referring to with the iPhone. It’s pretty crazy how good technology is nowadays.
@parasmisri19 сағат бұрын
Thanks 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
My pleasure. What camera did you end up going with? The iPhone 16 Pro or the Sony a6700 ?
@parasmisri13 сағат бұрын
@@thefilmalliance i dont raw videos ... Then i saw how sony alpha 6700 just destroys iphone 100 % going for camera above phone
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
Ah, good eye my friend
@shirakawanaoya6 сағат бұрын
The HDR in lower light. The overly bright faces. The obvious fake bokeh on the back if the violinist. The lens flare. All iphone.
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
It’s not obvious to most people, only those who have the eye for it such as yourself. Tell me, Between the iPhone 16 Pro and the Sony a6700, which one did you like more while shooting in low light?
@yamahass669 сағат бұрын
If you don't know as a photografer wich one is wich one, that's bad.
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
Did you know?
@FJano1214 сағат бұрын
Dedicated cameras really have few years left…
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
🕰️ is ticking. At this point in time…Between the iPhone 16 Pro and the Sony a6700, which one would you buy if you could only buy one?
@vm628Күн бұрын
Need the xm5 vs zve10 ii comparison sir
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
Yesss
@rea8572Күн бұрын
@@thefilmalliance when??? plz do it asap. thank you
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
As soon as I receive it
@vj25906 сағат бұрын
iphone : Dead in 2 years Sony: Dead in 7-10 years Almost both same output which one do u prefer
@thefilmalliance5 сағат бұрын
I prefer the 7-10 year route
@lilchad_hd21 сағат бұрын
Bro said he had to look at the file name to know the difference cmon there obvious difference between both, you not even have to look too hard, from no bokeh to fake bokeh and not get outlines..
@thefilmalliance13 сағат бұрын
That fake digital blur had me for a second. Don’t forget I look at hundreds of shots from different cameras. When I built out these comparison videos there are times that I have to make sure that the appropriate shot is over the appropriate camera. I think it’s only natural for someone to start second-guessing themselves, especially when we’re shooting in program auto with the sun high in the sky. Between the iPhone 16 Pro and the Sony a6700, which one did you dig more?
@Hafiz-p4nКүн бұрын
In Shooting 4K 120 FPS Sony α7S III (US$ 6,000) 10% Crop Sony FX3(US$6,000) 10% Crop Sony α6700 38% Crop Horrible 😝 i-Phone 16 Pro/Pro Max Zero Crop ⤴️🥇💯✨ i-Phone 16 Pro Max's 4K 120FPS in Apple ProRes Log Footage is BETTER THAN RED $30,000 Cinema Camera's 4K 120FPS kzbin.infoUgkxqucS4VFp3UI4P5Yw-nTgBsZXKawqW78Y?si=N31pxPpfz5UF6ORQ
@thefilmallianceКүн бұрын
I found 4k 120 a lot softer on the iPhone 16 Pro than the Sony a6700
FX3 Down samples 4K from a 12bit 12MP sensor which is Bayer binned out of a 48MP Quad Bayer, FX30 Down samples 4K from a 12bit 26MP sensor till 60FPS and one to one pixel readout for 120FPS, While iPhone 16 Pro just Binns down the 48MP Quad Bayer sensor to 12MP Bayer first and then further Binns it down to 8MP for 10bit 8MP sensor readout. Reading a sensor at 10bit is much faster hence iPhone can do it faster that too after pixel binning to 8MP. Mirrorless cameras on other hand have a 14bit sensor that reads out at 12bit for video except Fujifilm XH2s that uses 14bit video readout for up to 6K 60FPS. Still for 12bit you need to process 4 times more data than for 10bit sensor readout.