Is Darwinism a Religion? - Michael Ruse

[@TruggWalggger]

You said IN GODS NAME you would pay for Professor Dave to come to London to Debate him. You brought God into this!!!!!!

[@keephumble1]

A lot of people (atheist?) triggered in the comments. 👀 "This is the creation of Allah. So show Me what those other than Him have created. Rather, the wrongdoers are in clear error." Quran(31:11)

[@Lunar_harmony_001]

Give us proof of your sky daddy my guy

[@Heldan]

Where can we watch the full conversation please?

[@Oskyosky2009]

Quick answer…. No! Now let’s move on

[@phearz0r]

Short answer: "No." Long answer: "Are you mentally damaged? "

[@monsieurmarois]

No, it's not.

[@noneofyourbusiness7384]

If a solid scientific consensus that's only been confirmed for over a century hurts your feelings, just project and pretend it's a religion on par with your own. That works "great" for a lot of flat-Earth creationists😂 Also, Dave's waiting for your promised debate.

[@Mohammad-Malhis]

It surely is.

[@midlander4]

For his next con trick, Michael likens his scepticism about the loch ness monster to a religion.

[@PeterPiper247]

Bro don’t talk about false prophets and failed prophecies. 😂

[@lilkurva180]

what did he speak of

[@youtubeaccount3230]

Yh i know Jesus made false prophecies in the bible 😂

[@samosadosa2409]

@@youtubeaccount3230 you're right he and Mohammad both were wrong only science is right most of the times

[@keephumble1]

Try your best not to die ignorant. You know neither of Jesus nor Muhammad (peace be upon them) and clearly not about science, that was, and is pioneered by theists. @samosadosa2409

[@ConnortheTruthmaster]

My vision is We humans consist of 2 parts, a perfect part and an imperfect part, which hang together. Nature is imperfect, nature is only about reproducing and eating food and dying, you die when you have finished your goals. our perfect nature is about living forever, we have an ego where we want to live forever. We are not insects where we finish our goals then we die. We have an existence, our existence is much more special than just reproducing, we have strong self experience and experiences of others. Our perfect part therefore is proving God. God does not care we suffer because he has given us our existence, how the sufferings become likened to our existence, our existence is the greatest gift we have been given

[@homtanks7259]

JazakAllah'u khairan

[@ravenvalentine4919]

for what ? telling lies ?

[@homtanks7259]

@@ravenvalentine4919 very faggi picture, ngl

[@ReluctantAardvark]

Hey, I hope you’re going to get Dave Farina over from the states and take him (and his so called science) down in a live debate. I can’t wait to see this. That’s amazing that you’re going to pay his fare and hotel, etc. It will be worth it when you prove that he and all of science is wrong.

[@ED-TwoZeroNine]

Lol 🤣

[@evenrisk]

he wont, Dave would embarrass him. Dave has science and facts and Subboor has a poorly written fiction book and a pedo prophet

[@bojackssl093]

Lol Dave will humiliate this clown

[@Mr_Sh1tcoin]

Is that Dave Explains?

[@DanielAdam85]

I really hope @SubboorAhmadAbbasi will invite @ProfessorDaveExplains to come over. I can't wait to see ProfessorDave humiliate Subboor face-to-face. And please let it be a livestream so the rest of us can watch Subboor get some desperately needed education. 🤣🤣

[@ozeanatlantik4139]

Brother can u male a vidro on richard dawkings book?

[@ravenvalentine4919]

mail, not male, and this is a joke, he is wrong on everything, 1st year biology major in saudi Arabia would correct him, they study biology an medicine too, no need for richard dawkings book, your BRUHA lied in this entire video, go get an education

[@СтарикСтариков-ы4ч]

am concerned about one question that evolutionists appeal to: that our origin is from Africa from a woman from whom all modern humanity inherited mitochondrial DNA and who lived in Africa about 200 thousand years ago, how does this correspond in Islam? This seems to me to be a long gap before Adam (alaihi ssalam) and Eve, does your course have an answer to this?

[@killerbee6484]

They say modern man is quit near us not 200 thousands of years

[@korbendallas5318]

@@killerbee6484 Is there any evidence for that claim?

[@testtester6520]

@@korbendallas5318 yea , even evolutionists agree on this matter , they believe that the modern man came 300 to 200 thousands years ago , from one male , and one female .kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3-0gYShi5ihntk

[@magnetiktrax]

@@testtester6520 garbage

[@samosadosa2409]

Nah man cus if that was the case then human race woulda gon extinct by the amount of inbreeding / incest (i think it's sick that religious people support siblings having sex ,if there is a hell people like that should definitely go there)

[@Seeker-ec1dd]

Religions may impart certain morals, but morals by themselves have nothing to do with religion. Morals are just behavioral patterns that are endorsed by the society. You can see some rudimentary moral behavior in animals too, like sharing or being nice to those who help them etc.

[@youtubeaccount3230]

Yes but a atheistic society morals was taken from Christianity in Europe

[@Seeker-ec1dd]

@@youtubeaccount3230 Morals were not invented by Christians. They also evolved over millions of years of human evolution. Any sensible human can come with the basic morals.

[@youtubeaccount3230]

@@Seeker-ec1dd im sorry but that is a lie, your moral comes from the abrahamic religion, look at the tribes of the amazon in the past their morals was not the same as ours

[@mohamedelkayal8871]

​@@Seeker-ec1ddBut those are contingent on you defining what is good and what is evil. And from atheistic perspective that is entirely relative. Yes you can come up with morals but said morals are not universal. What makes them normalized is if societies e force them. Meaning if those same societies decide on something else then that would replace what was previously practiced and so on. In other words what I'm saying is that it's not something set in stone that you come to discover, it depends on your perspective, your feelings, your experiences, the world around you and you arrive to what constitutes as "moral".

[@Seeker-ec1dd]

@@mohamedelkayal8871 Good and bad are subjective, whether it is atheistic or theistic. Scripture may in many cases tell you what is good or bad according to the scripture, but it is still up to each individual whether to accept it or not. Scripture may tell you that it is ok to have up to four wives. Personally you may think it is a wrong practice.

[@siafok6960]

Is science a religion? Yes, a modern kind of religion! So why you don't walk on water?

[@kalijasin]

Science is Not a religion. It is however, being misused by atheists.

[@korbendallas5318]

@@kalijasin By all of them? In what way?

[@cyberyousef7519]

Science now days became a brand and a company In arabic the word used for science is the same one as “knowledge” there is something called the science of islam, do you believe in it?

[@midlander4]

@cyberyousef7519 yeah of course. Specially the stuff about the moon splitting in two.

[@siafok6960]

@@cyberyousef7519 but Islam is still the same: bullshit

[@Sweeti924]

Agnostic and atheist are not mutually exclusive ( you either are convinced there is god or not there is no in between, You either are convinced magic is real or not there is no in between, and for that reason every atheist is agnostic in some sense and every agnostic is atheist in some sense both are waiting for the evidence that god exist ( both are not convinced that god is real )

[@ishmammohammadadnan1525]

They are, read Dr. Shoaib's paper

[@Sweeti924]

@@ishmammohammadadnan1525give me argument

[@Sweeti924]

⁠@@ishmammohammadadnan1525what’s the difference? I’m not talking about hard atheism where people say god doesn’t exist I’m talking atheism where like me say I’m not convinced there’s a god therefore I reject the claim until proven because what theist have is positive claim ( god ) which needs exceptional evidence.

[@Sweeti924]

@thebin4 every atheist is somewhat agnostic except hard atheist but that’s I’m talking it’s lack of belief in god or deity agnostic are more tied to ( knowledge the limitations of humans to know ) that’s not big different atheism and agnostic are not convinced both have that same common ground so hell no they are not mutually exclusive

[@kalijasin]

In practice there is No different. They are both equally prejudiced against Religious people.

[@siafok6960]

Is Islam a science?

[@nova5stars729]

No

[@TheMagnificentGman]

Of course it is. Hands and feet can talk

[@samosadosa2409]

Short answer: no Long answer: ....no

[@ravenvalentine4919]

not even close