Apparently a "proper grown up" can't produce a pumped hydro storage power vrs battery power graph either... GW doesn't matter(no one cares). GWh does matter and here pumped hydro storage has TWh of storage. If this is a "win"... > hate to think what you call a loss.
@thomaskerkhoff5797 ай бұрын
Thank you for presenting a balanced view of the development of electrification in all its iterations. Keep onward...
@BeekeeperBill7 ай бұрын
"Delusional hopium" excellent phrase I will find very useful 😂
@dougsheldon55607 ай бұрын
Long time viewers have learned to gauge the importance of a technology by the height of your eyebrow rise, Dave.
@weldonyoung10137 ай бұрын
I always though it was the sarcasm. OH, these's only for the other end of the scale - the low end.
@kalvindeane15 ай бұрын
I didn't notice he had any until I saw this comment! :D
@Yanquetino7 ай бұрын
The graph of how the different chemistries stack up is helpful!
@SisGuitarGAS7 ай бұрын
Lovely to hear you speak at the Everything electric show at Harrogate this morning Dave! Even my 13 year old that I dragged along found it interesting - well done!
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Praise indeed if a teenager wasn't bored!! Thanks for your support. Much appreciated :-)
@GodmanchesterGoblin7 ай бұрын
You've got to love the folks at Fraunhofer - they know so much and present it so well, whatever the subject matter. (I visited them at Erlangen a couple of times around 20 years ago.)
@andycotton1627 ай бұрын
Nice to see the man behind the KZbin lens, in person at Everything electric north last friday. Great debates and input from the panellists.
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Cheers Andy. Thanks for coming along and supporting the event. Much appreciated.
@breakablec7 ай бұрын
Would be interesting to see a 3d chart of maturity, energy density, potential cost (considering price of materials and assembly), safety and possibly a vector on development speed for comparison.
@rcpmac7 ай бұрын
Not sure I could handle an additional d
@paddylogan137 ай бұрын
I was at all 3 days of EE North. I attended a lot of your panels and thoroughly enjoyed it. It was a great weekend, thank you.
@alanpmasters7 ай бұрын
Thanks
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Thanks for your support Alan. Much appreciated.
@udojahn85386 ай бұрын
As an engineer I know most of the cell types since 20 years. As an consumer most of my batteries are still lead ones. Yes my ebike got NMC-Lithium and the flash-Light/Telephone NiMH, at the end it must be affordable and safe! Thank you for this valuable summary
@phillip12117 ай бұрын
Nice to have a sane, unbiased view on this topic from someone who actuality knows what hes talking about. Like many, I'm quite fed up with the hysterical misinformation and panic you hear certainly in the UK media.
@martincotterill8237 ай бұрын
Great video, Dave, thanks for the battery updates!
@mrxmry32647 ай бұрын
Decades ago I read about sodium-sulfur batteries. I don't remember the details, but I do remember that they had a high operating temperature, hot enough to melt both the sodium and the sulfur. The upside was that when those batteries cooled down, they had zero self-discharge because everything in there was solid.
@Lewis_Standing7 ай бұрын
Presumably there's still the losses of heating the things up again before being able to discharge them
@gljames247 ай бұрын
They are being installed in Japan.
@rscott22477 ай бұрын
Supposedly BYD maker from China is using the sodium ion batteries in their ev's. Good to know those vehicles won't be catching fire anytime soon ?
@michaelbacon5617 ай бұрын
I remember Ford experimenting with those in an Escort van. Don't know why they bothered because it was obvious the crazily high temperatures required were going to scupper the whole thing.
@SilvaDreams6 ай бұрын
@rscott2247 At least something will help keep them from bursting into flames.. I wouldn't hold my breath though.
@Rkcuddles7 ай бұрын
13:49 looove this graphic. Can’t wait for the solid state roundup
@veganislandradio99577 ай бұрын
Cheers Dave. I have followed your channel right from the start. You are always informative and well researched. Your use of language is like a breath of fresh air...
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Thank you. I really appreciate that!
@2011ppower7 ай бұрын
Thanks Dave for another useful review for those of us too lazy to reseach for ourselves 😁👍
@pedropenduco31807 ай бұрын
Fascinating as usual Dave, love your work! I very much enjoyed your talks in Harrogate yesterday, I would have expressed my appreciation personally, but you were quite busy. Please keep up the good work. 🙂
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Thanks Pedro. Sorry I missed you, but thank you for coming along and showing your support. I really appreciate it -)
@freeheeler097 ай бұрын
Great reporting. Dave, my take is that an immediate need is affordable home storage batteries. Affordable ($10,00), 50 kWh home batteries would allow most homeowners to cut the bindings of the corrupt electric cartels and go off grid. And, home energy independence would be the gateway drug for the switch to electric home heating and cooling, electric cars, etc.
@ricos14977 ай бұрын
Great! Until the electric cartel becomes the battery cartel. What's the difference in paying 100 per month for electric, versus paying 10,000 for a battery every 10 years? We've been through all this before, the electricity companies simply happen to be the current monopliser of the day. As soon as we switch to an alternative, the "free market" circles around and monoplises the next technology and our human needs are then sold back to us by a different company (often with the same shareholders). The market will serve us an illusion of choice, hiding the real piture of a handful of companies owning all the tech, materials etc. It occurs in every single area of human need, whether it's our shelter, energy, food, water or whatever, it's either a company or a state monopoly. There is no independence from this system, without completely shunning it in all its material glory (a wood stove in a tiny house or such like).
@jb764897 ай бұрын
Mass abandonment of the grid would be catastrophic especially as those least able to abandon it would be those least able to maintain the grid. But hey, who cares about them, you got yours right?
@hitreset02917 ай бұрын
@@jb76489 community-based grids to address this inequality is the answer to a fairer electrical grid system.
@Biggest-hz7ng7 ай бұрын
Off grid is not a place to be given the intermittency of renewables and the need for electricity for heat pump heating during winter months. You need the grid to be trading power from your neighbouring countries or states on your behalf.
@Kevin_Street7 ай бұрын
Thank you for the new video! It's a nice summary and discussion of the different battery technologies. If I was a first time viewer I'd find this incredibly helpful as a way to understand the current state of the field. As a long time viewer though, it's not surprising to see lithium-ion, sodium-ion and redox flow batteries at the top of the TRL ladder. That's pretty much the impression I got from watching your earlier videos.
@jamesg23826 ай бұрын
Thank you. Beautifully produced as usual.
@tommclean74107 ай бұрын
I am disappointed that iron-air batteries were not included in the study. They are much higher on the TRL scale than the two metal-air battery types considered and may soon be a highly cost-effective solution to long-duration storage (100 hours). In fact, Form Energy is building an iron-air battery factory in the US now with contracts to install storage sites in 2025. Highly informative video as always!
@kensmith56947 ай бұрын
I agree that for stationary storage, iron-air looks like a good idea. The technology seems to be safe enough that it could be widely distributed so that the grid only needs to supply the average power consumption rather than the peak.
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
You're right Tom. I've done a previous video on Form Energy, and I probably should have mentioned them, even though iron-air does not feature in the Fraunhofer report. I also could have mentioned Lyten's Lithium-Sulphur chemistry, and Redflow's Bromine redox flow battery. All part of my own 'video production' learning curve I guess!
@tommclean74107 ай бұрын
@@JustHaveaThink Just to be clear, I was not disappointed in your video but the study which choose not to look at iron-air. In the meantime, thanks for the two new battery chemistries to follow up on!
@GTrainRx76 ай бұрын
Love the factual way you present the data, taking into account all the variables.
@Rouleau847 ай бұрын
Yes, I've been waiting for a video like this for a while, there are so many different competing battery options that it's hard to tell which is best.
@petterbirgersson44897 ай бұрын
This episode is what I have been waiting for. Thank you!
@ralpharmsby80407 ай бұрын
Great to see and hear you and the panel on Friday in Harrogate. We enjoyed the whole show - well worth the whole 2.5 miles we had to drive to get there 🙂
@vanhetgoor6 ай бұрын
I admire and respect the Fraunhofer Institut for the brilliant work they have done.
@jimhood12027 ай бұрын
Nice one Dave. Thanks. It's good to see where these technologies lie on the road to production
@TheWhyGuyChannel7 ай бұрын
Incredible breakdown explaining the differences. Thank you. Your channel and "Now You Know" are the only two channel I never skip with or without reading the title. In other words, I don't need to know what your videos are about before I'm willing to tune in. Of course I've only subscribed to two channels (kidding)... actually it's closer to a dozen.
@alsalus88497 ай бұрын
Thank you for your amazing work. I love this channel!
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoy it!
@BulkyPen7 ай бұрын
Absolutely love your content. Would be fantastic if some of our public officials could spend some time taking it in and acting on it
@chrisconklin29817 ай бұрын
The number of adds for home battery systems have increased. The day will come when there will be more stored electrical potential on the consumer side than with major power producers. Great presentation...
@GTN37 ай бұрын
Yes indeed! I think all of the growing micro grid enhancements are being ignored when the naysayers are fear-mongering about how our grid can't handle electrifying the transportation infrastructure.
@chrisconklin29817 ай бұрын
@@GTN3 There is a lot of talk about power grid system inertia, which is the ability to maintain a steady grid frequency. At this time that inertia comes in the form of the mechanical spinning of turbines. It sounds to me like a justification for the existence big power plants. Maybe so, but with a distributed network of batteries maybe less grid inertia could be possible. Also,, from what I have seen, about half of the electricity produced by a centralized system is overhead. Distributed generation would be able to handle the new transportation infrastructure needs.
@skierpage7 ай бұрын
@@chrisconklin2981 "the U.S. Energy Informatjon Administration estimates that annual electricity transmission and distribution losses averaged about 5% of the electricity transmitted and distributed in the United States in 2018 through 2022", so I don't know what you think you saw. You may be confusing the low "overhead" of efficient electricity with the fact that before it becomes electricity, more than half the primary energy in fossil fuels is wasted as heat.
@chrisconklin29817 ай бұрын
@@skierpage Yes I am talking in general terms. Ultimately we are talking about two different power systems. The present old model is a system of large central power stations that are interconnected. As electricity is an instantaneously generated commodity, load balancing is critical. To accomplish this, standby generating capacity is unused overhead. As a paridimial shift to a new model, batteries will be important because they are "time buffers". In a distributed generation system instantaneous frequency modulation can be pushed down to the use level. No longer will centralized power grids be required to balance load frequencies or provide backup. It is not yet proven that a distributed system can supply long term needs. So it remains an issue. To be fair unused battery capacity could be considered overhead.
@chrisconklin29817 ай бұрын
@@skierpage Actually, Just Have A Think had a good presentation on this three years ago. The title is: "How energy storage will kill fossil fuel". Also look at Virtual Power Plants (VPP).
@markbrookes8827 ай бұрын
Thanks for another informative video. Idea: Every video you make should display a TRL ladder showing what stage of development the current subject(s) are at
@dan83757 ай бұрын
I always look forward to another episode of just have a think. It's a little frustrating waiting for new information from Drexel University regarding monoclinic gamma phase sulfur. It generated a lot of excitement two years ago but no one seems to have any additional information since then. It would be nice to know what is going on with that project. Thank you for your good work.
@jeanpaulchristian32827 ай бұрын
The company zeta energy is exploitin the discovery of passivation of solysulphide via abslrbption in carbon nanotubes to produce an effective battery which is a little below the radar. Another company is exploits 2d wafets, Theion battery company, the thin layer has the suphur in a highly beneficial phase that allows for maximum electrocal conduction that maximizes structural phase integrity when as a surface coating for compatible electrode materials and is predicted to enable 1000wh/kg energy density, they a planning to produce the electeode materialsnfor any battery prototype developer that incorporates their science nnovation
@zam68777 ай бұрын
Nice sober assessment here, thanks
@punditgi7 ай бұрын
Dave is tops on my list for informative videos! Keep 'em comin'! 🎉😊
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Awesome! Thank you!
@snoopaka7 ай бұрын
You said no video next week and a few seconds later wait “I will see you next week” I totally understand though. Nicely researched video
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Yeah. Force of habit. Sorry about that ;-)
@mskmsk71746 ай бұрын
Excellent summation.
@fenalco7 ай бұрын
Dear Dave, as always....thank you for exist!
@dermotdonnelly54957 ай бұрын
Great video as usual 👌
@nitroxide176 ай бұрын
Hi, I have a question. At 3:50 you showed some numbers for the projected performance of MIB. I wasn't able to find this number in the study you linked. I was only able to find > 300 Wh/kg, > 400 Wh/l < 40 €/kWh for MIB's mid/long term performance projections.
@petesplaneta93407 ай бұрын
Great summary and great to see you in Harrogate at the weekend
@gregparrott7 ай бұрын
What is shown in the chart at 0:15 is inconsistent with what was verbally said. The chart shows POWER in GIGAWATTS, while what is verbally stated is ENERGY STORAGE (where the units would typically be GIGAWATT-HOURS
@insaneshepherd86787 ай бұрын
"Begleitmaßnahme zu Batteriematerialien für zukünftige elektromobile und stationäre Anwendungen." Rolls right off the tongue. If you read it quickly you feel like a rapper. Great video for anyone who's to lazy to read the reports like me. Thanks!
@jdsahr7 ай бұрын
Note the graph at 0:26; the vertical axis is GW; is that actually the correct unit? Wouldn't the more useful/interesting unit be GWh? Note that the storage capacity of Banks Lake in WA, USA is about 800 GWh, while it can deliver (only) 500 MW.
@flamboone97276 ай бұрын
I think the old acid batteries that today can be used but with a gel like substance using those materials which allow for large electric charges. The gel like substance reducing maintenance and lessening issue with spill accidents and easy clean up. For trucks, I think the German solution of overhead cables on highways to increase range of electric trucks.
@shawnr7717 ай бұрын
Thank you for the update and comnentary.
@pauloconnor8907 ай бұрын
Great video as always, what about the liquid metal battery?
@SmartEnergyLab7 ай бұрын
Thanks Dave for yet another great explainer video. You make the highly technical understandable without dumbing it down. Love those graphics too... how do you do it? BTW, as a bit of an audio snob... have you thought about getting a quality microphone?
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Thanks for your support. Much appreciated. The animations are done in Adobe After Effects. The microphone is a £325 Sennheiser. I'm not sure there's too much available at a higher quality than that.
@SmartEnergyLab7 ай бұрын
@@JustHaveaThink You or your AE editor are doing an impressive job with the animations... really adds to the quality of the presentation. Hmmm sounds like you have some good audio gear then... maybe it's just my ears that are wrong :)
@mikeharrington55937 ай бұрын
An excellent review and summary.
@adolfhochhaltinger40407 ай бұрын
I guess for all stationary batteries sodium will be the future.
@kenoliver89137 ай бұрын
Certainly they'll take over from lithium for stationary storage in the NEAR future, but some of these others might prove even cheaper in time. Either way, though, very cheap stationary storage will transform the economics of fully renewable grids to make them a no-brainer for most countries - something that would be true even if global warming wasn't happening.
@devluz7 ай бұрын
I don't think there will be one winner. One might work best for daily charging and discharging (solar) and others for discharging only on a weekly, monthly or yearly basis.
@MichaelBoyle-me3zq7 ай бұрын
The Germans made no mention of batteries developed in MIT under Prof Donald Sadoway Two are in utility scale trials : See “Ambri” high temperature and “Form” iron rust and de-rust batteries
@andrewsteinhaus82677 ай бұрын
Yes Form is great has funding to build at commercial scale. Unfortunately I believe Ambri has failed to secure funding to build out their commercial sized facility
@whlphil7 ай бұрын
Ambri went bust this last week
@whlphil7 ай бұрын
Form are reasonable bet though and have recently landed sone large projects and DoE funding
@wj94947 ай бұрын
What is the lifecycle of the batteries, the fire suppression system and maintenance vs. hydro? What is the TOTAL 50 year cost of a battery backup system.
@miscbits63996 ай бұрын
One can AND SHOULD be asking the same about windmills/Solar PV vs nuclear power
@-LightningRod-7 ай бұрын
Good Work friend !
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@kiwi_kirsch7 ай бұрын
2:00 that's easy, i'll read it out for you. it is eine begleitmaßnahme zu batteriematerialien für zukünftige elektromobile und stationäre anwendungen. simple!
@aliendroneservices66216 ай бұрын
1:55 2:08
@waqasahmed9397 ай бұрын
Good to meet you on Sunday, Dave! I'm absolutely hoping for the battery prices to crash tbh at the very least
@RWBHere7 ай бұрын
Thanks Dave. You mentioned Zinc/Air batteries. Non-rechargeable Zinc/Air batteries were being produced mainly for military applications when I was a child. And I'm older than you. They were activated by removing a seal, which initiated the reaction. The battery could not be stored for very long once activated.
@kenoliver89137 ай бұрын
Sure, but it is making them rechargeable that has always been the big challenge.
@mmmmmmgreg15457 ай бұрын
Very interesting as always. Have you looked into EOS Energy EOSE recently in the US? They are seriously scaling Aqueous Zinc with an automated line days away from operation and 3 more planned.
@davethefab63397 ай бұрын
Enjoyed your talks in Harrogate mate. ⚡️⚡️👍
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Cheers Dave. Thanks for coming along and supporting. Much appreciated :-)
@esioanniannaho59397 ай бұрын
Brilliant video. Can I ask if a similar independent analysis and review and comparison has been done for VAWTs and standard Retail or Home Wins Turbines ?
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
That might be one for Rosie Barnes over at Engineering with Rosie www.youtube.com/@EngineeringwithRosie
@malcolm62987 ай бұрын
I'd be curious of review of RethinkX and Tony Seba's past predictions on solar & batteries and future predictions re addressing climate change.
@mintakan0037 ай бұрын
Somewhat I think, what happened for solar, in terms of price drops, will happen for batteries (this decade). There was a time people talked about thin film CIGS as the solution to cheap solar. Remember that? But it turns out, good ole silicon still turned out to be the dominant technology. Maybe due to scale of manufacturing. Accumulated experience. Similarly, I think the same will happen for good ole lithium. (Maybe sodium has a chance also.). The demonstration (at scale), would come from the likes of BYD and CATL. This is with manufacturing issues solved, and deployment at scale. Lithium will still be, by far, the mainstream. Better ways of mining, refining, and recycling will be developed. We'll get better at dealing with lithium, and scaling up. The alternative chemistries may have a chance. They may have a niche for specialized use cases, such as high energy density, e.g. eVTOL's. Or long duration storage (e.g. iron air batteries).
@kensmith56947 ай бұрын
I am not sure this is useful but: A 50:50 mixture of Sodium and Potassium makes a metal that is liquid at room temperature and is also super reactive. Both metals can be produced fairly easily with electrical power serving to reduce them. NaK, I think contains a lot of energy per kg
@LS-jt4mh7 ай бұрын
Would love to hear your thoughts on Air-gen being developed at the University of Massachusetts 🙂
@TimeTravelReads7 ай бұрын
This is a great summary. Thank you.
@paul1979uk20007 ай бұрын
It's great to see so many options popping up when it comes to battery tech, and I don't think it will be a matter of the best that will win out but more about the tech that's good enough and can be manufactured cheaply enough and on mass, especially depending on use case. For home or grid energy storage, size and weight isn't as important, whereas price and how much energy can be stored is, whereas for portable tech devices or EV cars, weight and density is important, you want more energy in a smaller, lighter and more compact package. So honestly, I think we'll end up with many solutions when it comes to energy storage which the key driving force will be how easy it is to manufacture and how cheap it is to buy that will likely win out, in other words, not the best tech if it cost an arm and a leg. Still, we've been waiting for this holy grail of battery tech for so long that I wonder how much longer do we have to wait, but on the plus side, thanks to renewable energy and EV cars, there are a lot of ideas being experimented on when it comes to energy storage, as well as resources thrown at it, so it's only a matter of time and will probably happen much sooner because of the big push to renewables and EV cars taking off.
@weldonyoung10137 ай бұрын
I believe you may have missed the most important consideration - safety! That will vary depending on whether the battery is used for large scale stationary service or being mobile in any type of vehilce (perhaps with the exceprion of aircraft or ships).
@jfjoubertquebec7 ай бұрын
I'd love to share this list! Great! Very informative and gives a good sense of the state of the industry!
@aware2action4 ай бұрын
The achilles heel with, any high power density battery, is the safety and tendency towards thermal runaway. It is an elephant in the room, or a skeleton in the closet and could be a ghost from the past, which will haunt us someday in future!😂❤👍
@saddle19407 ай бұрын
You only briefly mentioned replacement plate type batteries. Wasn't there a demonstration of Aluminium-Air batteries where the Alu was in the form of a slide out tube, replaced when used up? The spent tube was sent back to the furnace for melting/rebuilding. I thought this model would be an easy swap over for the existing petrol service stations with drive in and out times of under a minute.
@EricJurisch7 ай бұрын
has there been any developments on the seawater battery / desalination plant concept?
@stevesedio16567 ай бұрын
What about liquid metal batteries like Ambri? Energy density is low, so it is suitable for grid applications.
@alberthartl88857 ай бұрын
Ambri is in chapter 11. May not survive.
@SilvaDreams6 ай бұрын
Did not survive even, they went bunk about the same time this was posted.
@stevesedio16566 ай бұрын
@@SilvaDreams Sorry to hear that, I liked their thought process, and the battery they came up with.
@eugen-m7 ай бұрын
is there an area where the batteries and supercapacitors meet? can a hybrid technology appear that would use the advantages of both?
@a.randomjack66617 ай бұрын
It all depends on profitability, like all the rest We are ran by junkies, “profit junkies” Socrates and/or Aristotle said (paraphrasing) 'Wealth is addictive, the rich will destroy society’
@jamesvandamme77867 ай бұрын
@@a.randomjack6661 If people can't make a profit because the cost is too high that nobody will buy the product, it doesn't get made.
@incognitotorpedo427 ай бұрын
@@a.randomjack6661 We are limited by the resources that we possess. Money is a proxy for resources, so batteries that can be built cheaply inherently use fewer resources than batteries that are expensive. If a battery is expensive, it is wasteful of resources. It also can not be sold at a profit. Profit is not evil. It is a gauge of what is possible with a given level or resources.
@skynet58287 ай бұрын
@@a.randomjack6661 You're talking as if the poor don't care about costs.
@a.randomjack66617 ай бұрын
@@skynet5828 It"s not the poor that set the price of things. 5 may 2022 - Eight men own the same wealth as the 3.6 billion people who make up the poorest half of humanity, according to a new report published by Oxfam
@peterjohn58347 ай бұрын
Excellent summary thanks. Will have to check out Redux
@andycordy51907 ай бұрын
I was sorry to see the Redox Flow battery reduced to a footnote at the end of the report and whilst I applaud the progess made with Vanadium RFB, the headline element is extremely toxic in extraction and disposal whilst other very advanced research and development which has been featured here has eliminated these risks. As someone with an eye on the domestic scale battery market for home applications, a future market with enormous potential as the Australian industry already shows, the focus on potential transportation appliications here seems rather myopic..
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
I probably should have included Redflow (from Australia) in the Redox section - they use Bromine and get twice the power.
@messiermitchell49017 ай бұрын
This was an interesting video! You don't hear the downsides of Li-S batteries much in press releases and updates by companies like Lyten
@barbaralemons47417 ай бұрын
On the zinc air one , Why not rent out and returni the spent case like at a grocery store propane tank dropoff cage , for off grid work/emergency kits/electric power tool rigs, sent back, anode replaced, rented again and again until case itself must (eventually) be recycled?
@1MarkKeller7 ай бұрын
Imagine ... aluminum siding batteries/super capacitors for all kinds of buildings. Imagine solid state batteries built into the driveway and/or the concrete slab the building is built on. Imagine solid state batteries used in privacy fences for homes and businesses and sound barrier fences alongside highways and interstates. Imagine wind turbines built to look like chimneys and smoke stacks so they don't stick out like sore thumbs. Imagine solar panels on every building and home.
@ianmciver77197 ай бұрын
Imagine China Not Burning all that Coal to make the Energy for making all of the above 🤣😂
@skierpage7 ай бұрын
@@ianmciver7719 found another person who can't understand the difference between fossil fuel it takes to make something versus the many times more fossil fuel displaced during its years of operation. You should apply the name of this channel before typing. @1MarkKeller, techno-optimism in the absence of products you can actually buy is just a plea for more R&D.
@JohnnyWednesday7 ай бұрын
@@ianmciver7719 - Imagine a world without racist bigots!
@E1Luch7 ай бұрын
@@ianmciver7719 China is the world biggest manufacturer of solar panels and wind turbines that deploys more of them than the rest of the world combined. They are also the worlds factory, making half the world's steel and cement for example. Their per capita annual emissions are on par with Europe's and their total emissions over the course oh history are less than that of the west since they only really started using a lot of energy in the last 20 years or so while the west did that during the whole 20th century.
@iuliancojocaru41257 ай бұрын
Imagine not being delusional
@wegder6 ай бұрын
Coal-fired power plants in China generate over half of the world's coal-fired power and a significant portion of China's electricity. In 2023, coal accounted for 39.9% of China's electricity supply, while non-fossil fuels like nuclear and renewables accounted for 53.9%. However, China is responsible for 95% of new coal power construction in 2023, with 70.2 GW of new construction underway, which is 19 times more than the rest of the world. As of August 29, 2023, China has 243 GW of new coal power approved or under construction
@FlushF00T7 ай бұрын
9:00 ‘it *is* an insurmountable goal’? 🤔
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
It is NOT an insurmountable goal, is what I said
@RNMSC7 ай бұрын
Something I'd like to see is a collection of simple, inexpensive solutions for the rural residence that may stor summer heat for winter use in something like a Sand Battery, perhaps geo heat pumps to moderate temps through the year, (This may even be passive, ads that was a solution for Earthships. And then for power (electricity) something that can provide 50-100 amp service for lights and a few appliances as the load, and a capacity of about 4-10 days of electricity for either bad storm or utility outages that take a while to restore. That sounds like a power wall, but I'd kind of like the power solution to be something that's not a Lithium based solution. The EV based solutions have there place, but I keep thinking that there is(somewhere) a solution that doesn't cost as much for a are earth metal, and perhaps doesn't require setting up a lifetime service and support contract with some third party.
@Neilhuny7 ай бұрын
If ever there was a case for a funny out-takes/bloopers section at the end of one of your videos it would be watching you trying to pronounce the full German for BEMA II
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
Ha! I didn't even attempt it. I know my limits!! LOL
@tomlakosh18337 ай бұрын
Argonne has published its Li-Air battery specs at 1000 Wh/kg and 1000 cycles some 17 months ago. Their polymeric ceramic electrolyte makes this possible and battery Co's risk suicide if they ignore these specs.
@anthonysaunders3457 ай бұрын
The best thing about the number of potential battery technologies being explored is that a few will probably work out!
@adrianlang65506 ай бұрын
Lots beyond my head, but very interesting. 👍👍
@brianwaines75107 ай бұрын
So much interesting information, my heads about to blow up trying to hold it all. Which of these do you think is most promising? The aluminum battery looks amazing to me due to the high energy density. How can we help it to move up the ladder quickly?
@fdellaricca7 ай бұрын
They skipped iron-air batteries, which are much higher on the TRL ladder, since there is already a company producing them (Form).
@JustHaveaThink7 ай бұрын
That's true, they did. I should have added Form Energy.
@peterpicroc60657 ай бұрын
Would have liked them to include the vanadium molten metal battery and the iron- air battery. You made videos about both.
@lvhao51056 ай бұрын
Well done sir
@stephenabbott9047 ай бұрын
Nice to meet you at Harrogate Great debates.
@seasn55537 ай бұрын
Battery technology is one of my fav sectors of tech. One day we will have multi day batteries hopefully
@dominicwalker18997 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video
@jamesdubben36877 ай бұрын
Looking forward to SS battery report coverage!
@michaelcoghlan91247 ай бұрын
Thank you M
@pelton2427 ай бұрын
Batteries V's Pumped hydro. It would be good to know how many Kwh each technology has ? I find it hard to believe batteries are as large. I agree they are trending above in installed capacity. Another great "Just Have A Think" Thankyou.
@richgoo7 ай бұрын
Invinity are doing great things with Vanadium flow batteries. As said here, they are for stationary storage.
@jasonwidegren32117 ай бұрын
Great topic!!
@kevinsaravanan56827 ай бұрын
@Just Have a Think. Your thoughts on Form Energy's batteries that use iron-air technology?