Is the term "Replacement Theology" a PROPAGANDA Tactic?

[@happilyreformed]

Brother, it’s good to see your face again and hear your voice! Thank you for starting this project and I’m looking forward to catching up on your posts as well as staying up with future posts! God bless and be encouraged I think you have found a calling. I can’t wait to catch up with you soon

[@GospelNerd]

@@happilyreformed Hey Brother! Thanks for the encouragement! 🙏🏼

[@sergesavard636]

Supercessionism was and still is the authentic teaching of all orthodox and apostolic Churches. Scofield is the to blame for the nonsense of Christian Zionism

[@GospelNerd]

Glad to hear He has kept a remnant... These days it seems rampant.

[@sergesavard636]

@@GospelNerd Yes a remnant exists, I am probably considered a remnant of a remnant as Traditional Catholic, (yes I am one of those) we may have theological difference but we are generally on the same side. The JQ is the biggest that effecting all of us.. Christ is King...

[@stevenlindsey2056]

​@@sergesavard636That is not true. The gospel of Roman Catholicism is a false gospel. Roman Catholics are not Christian.

[@GospelNerd]

Oh, I can't go with you on the Catholic road. I was raised under the Roman system and it certainly was one of many stumbling blocks for me in my youth.

[@ericdelanoy5896]

@@sergesavard636JQ??

[@read.romans8]

🔥

[@GospelNerd]

👨🏽‍🚒

[@PETERJOHN101]

Some of your discussion seems to take liberty with the scriptures. For example, in Romans 11 where Paul refers to being grafted into the good tree, he is not using the word tree as a metaphor for Christ, he is using it as a metaphor for Abramic lineage. We are indeed grafted into the tree of Abramic birthright. Through faith and baptism we do become spiritual Jews, but Paul maintains the distinction between ethnic Jews and everyone else, pointing to a future time when _all Israel shall be saved._ (Rom 11:26) Paul becomes even more clear by the time he warns us to avoid boasting against the original branches lest we be cut off. Ethnic Israel has certainly not disappeared, as Paul says at the opening of this chapter with the words, _God forbid._ I have to admit I'm not completely sure I know what doctrine you are intending to express, perhaps you will be more clear in a follow up.

[@GospelNerd]

@@PETERJOHN101 thank you so much for your feedback. This KZbin thing is harder than it looks. I agree I could have been clearer. And I think you're also right that another video is really the appropriate venue. I find it impossible (at least to find the time) to really hash things out in comments beyond minor clarifications. But I'll try here anyway and hopefully not make it worse: what I should have said about Romans 11 was the root is Christ (the Root of David), the tree is the covenant. I wouldn't change my point though that the people are the branches. We aren't grafted into the people, but the root, through the covenant promises of God, whether to Abraham or the eternal covenant in God Himself is another subject. I am disappointed to read that after the video, you may still think I said that I believe in "replacement"of ethnic Israel. I did not say that ethnic Israel has disappeared. I tried to point out that not all of the "natural branches" were broken off. That's kind of the whole point I meant to convey with the video and why "replacement" is a misrepresentation. I'll try harder to be more clear in future videos.

[@PETERJOHN101]

@@GospelNerd Your explanation indeed helps, thank you and God bless!

[@hannahflores4353]

❤

[@GospelNerd]

Thank you for being with me from the beginning!

[@ericdelanoy5896]

Not replacement…expansion. Same with the covenants of God….another topic for another video.

[@GospelNerd]

@@ericdelanoy5896 Amen. Thank you brother