Is The West A Threat To Islam? | Islamic Modernism Documentary

[@HikmaHistory]

Do you believe a civilisational clash between the West and Muslim world exists? Full Modern History Playlist: kzbin.info/aero/PLiPhmAD3I2Jz6goEJlQ1zh6KkbeBWZ2pP

[@Omer1996E.C]

Yes, there is, and it's still going on

[@LordDoof]

Yes, but the West also doesn't seem to know what it wants to be anymore as well. Times are changing and both worlds will have to figure out what their direction is going to be.

[@beepboop204]

always been fascinating to me how "The West" once encompassed areas of Greece / Turkey that later for various people, do not encompass "The West". if "The West" is supposed to be the Straussian idea of "Athens + Jerusalem" then would "The East" be a. "Mecca + Jerusalem" or b. "Athens + Mecca" 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@westrim]

Like a lot of social conflicts, there doesn't have to be and there's no inherent reason why there should be, but people may make it happen regardless. But it should always be understood as a choice, which requires both sides to insist on it and drown on those who disagree, not an inevitability. Political Islam spent most of its existence more tolerant, accepting, and flexible than most of the history of political Christianity. There's no inherent reason it can't take that mantle again.

[@bpcgos]

Its more like west vs the false image of islam they created to make an enemy themselves and not the real islam. Islam just like the west, pretty much protecting individual ownership,Islam let the rich become rich as long as zakat being paid and didnt break any rules Allah create in al-quran (no interest, no gambling, no alcohol, no cheating in trade,no free sex, no drugs,etc) . The one created the false image of Islam that many still believe sadly as the real islam, didnt like the value of islam that prohibit many value I mentions before because it will disrupt their source of money. If we care to seeking truth for a bit, all of that what islam prohibit is among the biggest money maker business in this world, like interest in banking, porn industries, gambling industries, drugs and alcohol bussiness. Imagine if Islam in rule in this world, all of that bussineses will be pretty much abolished and straight up illegal practice.

[@IAmTheOnlyLucas]

Hikma always with these incendiary titles, just to talk abt some semi-obscure figure in Islamic history no more recent than the 19th century.🙄😂

[@ADot-fi1ny]

I was like damn, I thought you'd mention the 21st century 😂

[@HikmaHistory]

It’s an art form… did you enjoy the video tho?

[@ADot-fi1ny]

@@HikmaHistory Sure bro. 19th century Arab and Muslim history is right up my field. It's the one of the most consequential periods in the region IMO

[@irfansheikh3046]

It's a case study.....And the figure you call semi- obscure changed the destiny of Muslims in South Asia. Get out of your arab superiority delusion ...Arabism is not Islam....

[@brookechang4942]

As a non-Muslim who doesn't know much about Islam or Islamic history, thank you for making this content accessible. I especially enjoyed learning about how both Khan and al-Afghani placed such importance on both logic and education. That's an admirable point of view, and I think both Muslims and the West would benefit from learning more about each other.

[@mattburrito]

to be honest im a westerner the eastern nations/countries will never co exist with the west unless the east is equal to the western culture

[@HistoryOfRevolutions]

Umayyad Poet Imran bin Hattan writes: أَرى أَشقِياءَ الناسِ لا يَسأَمونَها عَلى أَنَّهُم فيها عُراةٌ وَجُوَّعُ أَراها وَإِن كانَت تُحَبُّ فَإِنَّها سَحابَةُ صَيفٍ عَن قَليلٍ تُقشَعُ "Miserable are people who crave for riches And deprive themselves of tranquility Though life may be luring. It is short and will depart soon"

[@FantomwithanEff]

And then you get the 72 virgins

[@James-ip8xs]

Not to troll but sounds like major cope.

[@SonoftheFortunate]

Allah said: "والعصر " "إن الإنسان لفي خسر" "إلا الذين آمنوا وعملوا الصالحات وتواصوا بالحق وتواصوا بالصبر" By the Time! Surely humanity is in loss, except those who have faith, do good, and urge each other to the truth, and urge each other to perseverance. May Allah guide us to seek the Akhirah rather than this worldly dunya.

[@ahmadfrhan5265]

@@James-ip8xs cope is that you believe your white people are rich because of their values, most countries follow democracy and liberalism but yet all these countries are poor only the west and it’s military basis ( s Koreas and Japan) why is that? Because the west forces other countries to consume and not produce because if you produce you will have your independence and can have decisions, this is what the west hates, that’s why they sanction or go to war with any country that produces anything and want to gain political and economical independence. The cope comes from 👱🏻‍♂️ who play victims

[@yahranian]

It's true, it's kinda why there's so many concepts of the afterlife in menu different religions. ​@@James-ip8xs

[@eugenesteinbeck9469]

No. What polemics call "The West" is just modernity. Modernity breeds a lot of existential and religious crises, but it also creates opportunities. The struggle of modernity is to navigate the challenges so that you can have the best of both worlds. This is a personal struggle. It cannot be resolved through violent revolution or coercing an outdated way of life on individuals who want no part in it. What modernity did was given everyone a choice. Many people aren't strong enough to choose right, but this choice isn't the enemy. Rather, it is yourself, and this is true of all humanity.

[@CatholicMuslim-dz5rj]

It usually doesn’t have to do with the western parts of any regions. Sort of vague.

[@NaviRyan]

The way I describe it is the west chose technology innovation and modernization after a century of figuring it out, then expecting the rest of the world to immediately catch up. Which is more than just tv radio and media. If you’re a western doctor who knows how to cure a disease, and you can’t because the locals trust a charlatan who says he can cure them with snake oil or incense is aggravating. Societies can also choose to modernize rapidly, but suffer serious consequences. East Asia particularly Japan, and Korea, chose modernization without caring for the humanities/social studies. Japan and Korea experienced rapid industrialization and rapid population collapse. As a result Japan and Korea are literally working their societies to death. Also no I am not advocating for a rejection of modernization only that modernization is a reality every country is faced with and has to handle it in a unique way. The local charlatan will most likely just become a tik Tok influencer and regularly cause public health emergencies.

[@mahatmaniggandhi2898]

bravo

[@HeroHoundoom]

If we are being honest, both are a threat to each other. Expansionist doctrines exist in both cultures and clashes were/are essentially inevitable.

[@moisascholar]

True, both faiths are missionary-based.

[@feartheamish9183]

Also he mentions Ottomans, and Mughals. Two Muslim colonizer/empires that did the same thing to the natives of the lands they ruled... like you realize half the shit going on in the middle east started with the ottomans.

[@feartheamish9183]

Why do you speak as if the Mughals weren't foreign invaders who forced their religion kn the Hindu population? Maybe thats the reason the Hindu population chose the British.

[@Nobody-q2j]

@@feartheamish9183Mughals are Turks, not Arabs. The Turks are nomadic invaders. Just because they accepted Islam, It didn’t change their nature. The majority of the problems in Muslim lands can be traced back to a Turkic migration or invasion of the land, then assimilating, and assuming authority.

[@fanthony]

@@feartheamish9183boom!!!

[@geometrix236]

We Muslims should take inspiration and lessons from Western Civilizations' progress and advances in scientific and economic areas,while defending our customs and traditions

[@zakback9937]

We Muslims should take inspiration in using the means of resources whilst keeping our principles and foundation to not compromise it.

[@geometrix236]

@angelameulemans7263 if that was about religion,the west wouldn't lost to muslims early on,west lost against muslims in middle east,anatolia,north africa and spain,they reorganised and reformed,thus becoming stronger.Now its Muslims time to reform and strengthen themselves

[@nodamage8011]

@angelameulemans7263 "What does the Islamic world give or bless the world with? Nothing!" You are extremely ignorant and you seriously need to look into the role Islam and Muslims played in paving the way for the renaissance which was crucial for the west.. Every great nation or empire throughout time takes what works well from previous empires or nations and then they use that foundation to build upon. Its the same with any form of science or philosophy you build upon the ideas that others either created or contributed to. thats what newton meant when he said "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants". You could literally just have gone to google and typed "how did islam contribute to the west" or "how has islam contributed to the world" and you would have had the answer instead of coming here and trying to act smart and attack Islam making a complete fool out of yourself in the process.. you should be ashamed either way because you are either ignorant and shouldnt be speaking about things u have no idea of or you are a liar just trying to attack islam.

[@soonlegend3659]

So in your opinion the west is in the bring of civil war ?

[@Shahanshahz007]

What does the west have to teach us they don’t even know what a women is. 😅

[@DeadstockDownsouth]

About to watch but I already know this a banger video

[@joeshmoe8345]

Thanks a bunch for sharing this with us Big Dog!

[@missourimongoose8858]

Id say the reverse is equally true for everyone living around islam not just the west...

[@EuropeanQoheleth]

An American would say this. 😒

[@missourimongoose8858]

@@EuropeanQoheleth and a douchey European would try and deny it without evidence so I ask you since your such a super smart person tell me exactly where islam gets along with other religions, I'll give you the whole world to choose from....

[@McVaySwifty]

Hikma History is cooking!! Lovely stuff

[@HikmaHistory]

Thanks bro!

[@houseoffirebellytoads1439]

Without lies, Islam dies.

[@ridhimalifestyle100]

True

[@errrrrshhhhh]

Muslim were cheering when Arabs when invaded iraq,iran,syria,india,africa,egypt.Muslim turk invading India,ottomon invading Constantinople,greece,romania. Same muslim started crying when similar happened with them.

[@REmm-rf8fl]

Can we talk about this more, please?

[@Antiwesternthug]

Westerners were cheering when romans conquered most of middle east Spain etc, same westerners started crying when middle Easterners were liberated by other middle Easterners from south from roman western rule and wanted to reoccupy

[@Handle0108]

@@Antiwesternthug exactly, these guys only thing they have a right to have power and protect their regions.

[@Antiwesternthug]

Muslims track record of invasions are nothing compared to wests track record if you look at mainstream history. West's shinanegans still have an effect on problems around the world today and they went more ham than anyone else in exploitation, supremacist behavior, discrimination, genocides, starvation, and still have not stopped completely

[@errrrrshhhhh]

@@Antiwesternthug Spain was liberated from muslim. Muslim occupied that place and then liberated back and given to original people.

[@Matt_The_Hugenot]

I feel this video is a little anglocentric. The impact of Russian colonialism was at least as great, if not greater, than that of Britain and France.

[@muhammadadeel8639]

No Russians didnt try to modernize Islam like the British. British/Anglo-saxon have a weird agenda of trying to modernize cultures, religions, society, family, gender, ......

[@Apathy.Apathy.]

@@muhammadadeel8639Anglo-Saxon culture has essentially been optimised to be as economically efficient as possible. The British were obviously going to try to do with their colonies in order to make more money off them.

[@muhammadadeel8639]

@@Apathy.Apathy. Its not the anglo-saxon culture --- its the banking elite that chose Britain as a stable secluded Island that would be safe for their investments. 1697 -Bank of england was taken over by globalists. 1648 revolution was also Funded most probably by those elites, like French rev was funded by secret societies funded by banking elites.

[@ZubairAhmed-od2xv]

@@muhammadadeel8639 No , the just outlawed it outright..

[@muhammadadeel8639]

@@ZubairAhmed-od2xv Yes the communists (Atheistic jews) banned all religion, but the tsarist russia didnt, nor did modern russia.

[@MasterofRoflness]

first

[@theuniverse5173]

Love thy content

[@54032Zepol]

Dude 😎

[@Eugene-tm8fm]

The man himself

[@yendevus1747]

gay

[@OLDMANWAFFLES]

Real Goofy Goober hours

[@boyinavault]

Excellent video !!

[@lerneanlion]

Here's a thing about education: It required money. And the higher the education, the more expensive it is. No Muslim rulers at the times have ever thought about matters regarding the economies at all. They never realized that the Silk Road had been in decline until it was too late. And while some Muslim states have the some ambitions left in them, they failed to implement them and sadly, they only had one shot at such an opportunity. So what can the Muslim nations like the Ottoman Empire or the Khedivate of Egypt do to restore their economies without taking loans from the European nations? Well, colonizing New Holland, which was the name of Western Australia at the time, will be the good option. Back then, the British were only colonizing Eastern Australia so far and while the western parts have already been explored, they only discovered iron ores so far and no colonization happened yet because the British government saw no profits can be made from mining iron ores. So that could be the chance the Ottoman Empire and the Khedivate of Egypt were looking for. By mining those iron ores and discovering other resources such as salt, gold, mangese and pearls in New Holland, the Sublime Porte and the Khedive's government can actually sponsored their own education and modernizing without taking loans from the European nations. P.S: What if the Urabi Revolt succeeded?

[@RoniiNN]

The only channel thats covers the Islamic world and view that is high quality.

[@basedmuslim9645]

Historically speaking when muslims opened up western territories we just alchemized the good things they had there, and filtered out the bad. Somehow we let the bad in and it has us in the situation we currently find ourselves in right now .

[@Sempermortis84]

Great video as always.

[@abdullahozek8016]

These people were absent from understanding the Western mind and the science and Qur'an . They were block headed. And they could not practice the Qur'an and its science.

[@silveryuno]

These videos that let us see the world thought different eyes are always a treat.

[@navinkumarpk86]

The image at 9:07 has nothing to do with Egypt; it's showing the monarchs of major powes including Turkey, Persia, Austria, Japan, etc.

[@Eugene-tm8fm]

Ooh I’m early for this

[@Crabby303]

5:29 not sure if this was the case tbh, my understanding is that the Brits were keen to paper over any religious differences (which would make admin easier) but that the Brahmins and Imams respectively pressured them to codify the differences. But I may be wrong on this.

[@youngimperialistmkii]

This is a very thought provoking series. The clickbait titles are a nice touch too.

[@bigsarge2085]

Interesting.

[@hoardroarklaughed]

Your history is excellent but the titles are getting a little click baity friend

[@user-fo9lm4dx6y]

Very informative video. Thank you 👏🏻

[@PressEntertainmentLLC]

Word of advice to all who are interested in Islam done join Islam in the West be a individual not a congregation or apart of a congregation

[@dkoz8321]

Islam: We must free ourselves from colonialist conquest also Islam: We must conquer everybody So no thank you. If I am gonna colonized and conquered, let it be by The West. Thank you very much.

[@samuraiyun219]

They already did colonize most of the world, how did that turn out? You want to go back to that? Read some history before talking nonsense

[@ibrahimmohammedibrahim9273]

There's huge difference between conquest and colonization

[@mrmr446]

To most Muslims their faith doesn't tell them to conquer everybody, that's just the fanatics.

[@Mrchungus11C-OIR]

They wanna change the rules of the game now, that they aren’t playing as well. Somehow them systematically destroying all opposing religion in the region when they were on top was okay.

[@mrmr446]

@@Mrchungus11C-OIR How many religious minorities lived in Europe for most of history? Same question for the Middle East after the spread of Islam?

[@Anubis-hm7ro]

Thank you

[@onlyyoucanstopevil9024]

WEST : NO EVERYTHING : YES

[@SundryMoorsIslamicAssemblyTV]

No such thing. Wrong title.

[@blacklisted4885]

Everything is a threat to Islam. Most of all common sense and reason

[@magma9000]

😑

[@VladVlad-ul1io]

especially

[@Based_Proletariat]

Islamophobes just flood the comment sections.

[@zakback9937]

Says the guy with a Hindu crackhead as a profile picture. The audacity.

[@VladVlad-ul1io]

:)). True

[@turk2017]

Turk here. I am a Kemalist, and agnostic. Secularism is the only way to go for Muslims. Except from Turks, Bosnians and a few Turkic nations, the remianing Muslim societies seem like they wanna turn back the time and live in 8th century :) Go and read the Ottoman history if you wanna know how conservatism undermined the muslim socities and put them all in a backward situation which can be corrected in 50 years at least with a some shocking reforms. Most of the muslims live like a muslim just because they are afraid of their socities' reaction but not because of their onw free will.

[@Goen-pp4vi]

Muslims want to go back to 8th century because at that time Muslims where in thier golden age

[@lotcam4046]

You lack insight, as your ancestors found their Empire upon Islam while the people(Late Ottoman Sultans) whom you speculate as Islamic are all hedonist and away from religion, even committing Bi'dah, That's the reason Al Wahhab who was a Islamic reformist was against the Ottoman Empire, And on top of that even after adopting Kemalism what have you achieved unlike Saudis who are strict Wahabi(a school of thought) Muslims while they wield wealth, influence and prosperity, also they have better understanding of distinguishing culture, religion and prosperity, as they saved their culture, religion and achieved prosperity while becoming a power player in the middle-east, also they have better understanding of the western mentality. Islamic Republic Of Iran which succeeded the Shah regime which was a puppet ruler and an staunch supporter of the WEST ruined Iran while the rich were getting more richer poor were becoming more poor and almost sold Iran to the WEST then the Ayatollahs came and established the Islamic Republic and are strict Ja'afri, have their country's influence and power stretched across all of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Palestine and greatly heightened their military prowess and technology despite being in sanctions, while Taliban who are strict Deobandis had defeated the US and NATO and freed their country Afghanistan from invaders while growing their currency value above the both Indian and Pakistani currency value and slowly moving towards development. Lebanon was on the verge of Israeli occupation and Hezbollah saved it while being a newly formed organization and still protecting Lebanon militarily, providing services of Education, Health and others, But what had Turkiye Achieved by applying Kemalism instead of being in the lap of NATO and shamelessly asking for the joining of EU, All the mentioned countries above are growing in strength, wealth and prosperity without EU and while some are even in sanctions. Kemal just made Turkiye survived from being occupied and divided while his ideology totally made the Turkish nation a slave to the WEST, you are still hanging upon the one achievement of the past instead of seeing that this ideology is getting Turkiye struck at the bottom.

[@turk2017]

@@lotcam4046 3 out of 4 first caliphs were killed by Muslims, not by western puppets or seculars or zionists or by polytheists. Early decades or even early centuries of arabic history is mindblowing. Muslims razed Kaaba twice, destroyed the Black Stone several times. Etc etc.. Fitna? Well it is a handy term to cover all the crimes, shortcomings, failures or wrongdoings of all the rulers, dynasties, families.. Atatürk was a great man, and he was well ahead of his time. He was the first man who stood up and said the truth, the truth hundreds of scholars,mollahs, and so called brilliant men refrained from saying for this and that reason: Caliphate was nothing but a form of dynastynor power to abuse hundreds of millions of muslims for centuries. Islam and its teachings is one thing, using Islam for your own family, tribe, peope is another..

[@SusanaXpeace2u]

i WENT to Turkey in 1994 and it seemed fairly European, but now it seems to have got worse. this is the danger with islam. it doesn't move forward, looking at the rights of its citizens, nope, at any moment, islam can drag society back in to a cave

[@leebarry5686]

You have essentially misunderstood Islam

[@SerrvantX]

Stop the music bro

[@the_abbasid]

While the West may pose a direct military threat, its cultural influence presents a superior challenge. We possess a superior moral stance and are better equipped to navigate this influence, particularly given the pervasive decline of Western cultural values across various dimensions. To safeguard our collective identity, it is imperative that we resist the pressures of modernization and reassess treaties engineered by Western powers to sow divisions within the ummah.

[@54032Zepol]

The west would never allow a pan-Islamic state! This what they are doing now to sow division, war and corruption to prevent the unity of Islamic denominations.

[@OLDMANWAFFLES]

@@barbell4492>We You and your army of scholars?

[@mikexstad1121]

Islam offers no contribution to the future.

[@ahmadfrhan5265]

now about Democracy it gives the rights to everyone specially the degenerated and rights for lobbyists who play on the country's affairs in and out and rights for people with bad intentions to reach powerful positions and divide the country in left and right and make the country stand for nothing and destroys the identity of the people ( civilization ) sound fimilar? 🏳️‍🌈🇪🇺🇺🇸 Historically speaking all countries and civilizations stood for something and if you tolerate everything than you stand for nothing. in order for a civilization to stand against hardship and all waves they need to stand for something and democracy and secularism doesn't offer this in fact both are hypocritical systems and subjective. Democracy is Hypocrisy as i explained why above. in nowhere that secularism is " good ". The UN is highly western based and most of world countries from Asia to Africa to eastern Europe to south America refuse LGBTQ refuse feminism refuses the banking system refuses the modern slavery ( salve wage ) refuses western subjective vales ,but yet they push it on all of us. using utilitarianism then the west shouldn't be pushing their values on the majority and the majority can take down the west. that's why in political science there's a famous quote " the liberal global order is neither liberal nor global " ( meaning only western based and other countries don't anticipate on it or they will be sanctioned and fought by the west ). also, this is by definition slavery because they tell us what to do and if we refuse, they punish us , starve us or kill us and we have to follow them when they are the minority. so utilitarianism doesn't work and they are enslaving us. shariah God is our Maker and he knows what is best for us. Everything God made forbidden, It harms us in individual level and collective level And everything God Made Halal ( allowed ) is good for us in individual level and Collective level. for example, Islam believes in the institution of Marriage highly. without it the society will fall as we see. Why? because without Marriage there's no commitment nor rules and Women will end up having Kids without fathers for which will produce single parent households which produces mental illness which eventually gives birth to all types of decadence. In Islam we believe our actions have consequences in individual level and collective level. In secular society, Criminals who committed murder and vile crimes, are put in Jails belt by the people's taxes and fed by the people's taxes. In Islam, People who committed Murder and vile crimes like spreading decadence which leads to the demise of the society, are put to death. In secular society, Alchohol is allowed which harms the person in individual level and collective level. in individual level it destroys his life achieving nothing and causes kidney failure, in collective level it destroys the family which leads eventually to the destruction of society as mentioned before and the birth of all decadence. In Islam, Alchohol is forbidden and the one who sells or drinks get lashed publicly. Now if you do it in your home and no one sees that's your sin ,but to do publicly or advocate for it, you go against God's rule that protect society. Sin is contagious and that is why it must not be public. God said in the Quran " You may dislike something although it is good for you, or like something although it is bad for you: God knows and you do not.’" I can see why now Shariah is the way to live and build a strong society and the only way to eradicate all decadence and isms in society. Note: no Muslim countries now don't implement the sharia now because if they did, they will be sanctioned or " freedom" will be lunched on them. But We implement shariah on ourselves and our families and society willingly and if it must, we force it on our society even if our country refuse.

[@OLDMANWAFFLES]

@@barbell4492 ALLAHU AK-

[@gormit0]

3:25 Here from Aligarh Muslim University(founded by sir Syed)

[@Crabby303]

Excellent, excellent video. The lost chance at an Islamic "reformation" is such a tragedy. If there's one thing that could move the Islamic world on it would be the acceptance that religious belief is a purely personal matter, and matters of state etc should be based on empirical data as much as possible. Look at the state Turkey's gotten itself into based on the beliefs of the crypto-Islamist Erdogan, crazy stuff.

[@muhammadadeel8639]

Christianity was destroyed by Reformation and secualrism. Muslims are wise to reject reformation and secularism, this has protected the religion. Worldly power is not the first priority of any religion

[@jamesmurphy9426]

Call it the Colonial Crusade

[@mikexstad1121]

Secularism keeps winning, religions keep moving the goal posts. Islamic nations and peoples are completely reliant on atheists and secularism. Technology, healthcare, economy, and culture... Islam and religion offer nothing and make no contribution to the future. This is posted for a global audience on KZbin afterall. The Quran did not mention electricity, america, the internet, or KZbin. I find it super ironic, as all these things are obvious blasphemy. Anyways, the title of the video isn't really the topic in the title.

[@Handle0108]

none of that is blasphemy, the Quran is the eternal testament to humanity until the end of times. The Quran speaks not of limitations on the millions of things that we may do in the future, but it merely warns us of what we aren't allowed to do for certain which is a limited set of vices.

[@zakback9937]

Presentism fallacy. Go check up on Abdullah Andalusi.

[@mohamednazir913]

Great piece of work. The time will come when the Western intelligentsia starts debating how much the West is responsible for the existing disturbance in the Islamic World particularly Middle East. But it will be too late as almost all indicators shows their power is rapidly declining and they would have no influence and credibility to fix things. George Galloway said in the British parliament: “Iranians are not likely to listen to him [British prime minister] when Britain occupied Iran, looted its wealth and overthrow its one democratic government in my life time”.

[@puraLusa]

Self criticism - no Blaming someone else - yes

[@Handle0108]

@@puraLusa because the west is reponsible, we are only responsible for not responding appropriately to western actions.

[@puraLusa]

@@Handle0108 that kind of victim atitude denotes indoctrination and an inability of nuance and grey zone. It serves 3rd parties in world play. "muah murica bad" goes along with using an ad-hominem to shut any criticism or dialog and thus any improvement or progression. In fact, it's the basis for bad ideas to get to power, an example being nazi germany emergence as a reaction to the victim atitude of germans post wwi. It completely lacks depth and agency, it's a phenomenon that gives way to the racism of low expectations or self-hatred. It's a very distructive and dangerous mental state.

[@TheCat48488]

​@@Handle0108that is called pot calling cettle black

[@Handle0108]

@@TheCat48488 how? When have our governments interfered/intervened in your internal politics?

[@leebarry5686]

There are no traditional Islam and modern Islam , but the same Islam understood in different backgrounds of knowledge. So that the understanding could match the knowledge and realities of an era. Hence there is a modern level of understanding of Islam , which goes back to same root as explained in Quran and practiced by the prophet and his companions.

[@AFGeezy]

Nice thumbnail

[@ash_11117]

I certainly hope so.

[@IbrahimStanikzai]

I believe there was a clash that exsist let to be honest Europe was a christian civilization meanwhile middle east was Islamic civilization.Yes science and secularism should indeed be promoted in middle east so that living standards of people will improve in middle east and my request for all please don't go to Europe your native countries need you most and more you move to Europe more the clash between islam and Christianity will grow so don't move to Europe.If we lose islam to Christianity /European civilization than that means we will lose and surrender middle eastern civilization to European civilization or crusaders so don't accept christianity and western culture.But yes science and tolerance should indeed be promoted in middle east.Minority relegion rights should indeed be protected in middle east but stay in touch with Islamic teachings remember that you are the sons of great Middle Eastern civilizations . Conflict between Europe and middle eastern civilization is older than islam and Christianity itself because its were European greeks whom invaded middle east by destroying great middle eastern civilization the Achemineid empire of Persia this was the thing that started this clash.Whole middle ages were the time when we muslims always fought against these crusaders of Europe when they Invaded middle east in the name of their barbaric crusades just because we liberate Anatolia which was part of middle east occupied by European greeks .Before greeks native Anatolians exsist in Anatolia.

[@ribeirojorge5064]

Secularism is Not a Step Forward in Civilization Evolution but a Step Backwards But Secularism is One Step Backwards in order to Human Consciousness have Three Steps Forward in Authentic Religiosity ❤️ 💚 💜

[@h.n1977]

{ یُرِیدُونَ أَن یُطۡفِـُٔوا۟ نُورَ ٱللَّهِ بِأَفۡوَ ٰ⁠هِهِمۡ وَیَأۡبَى ٱللَّهُ إِلَّاۤ أَن یُتِمَّ نُورَهُۥ وَلَوۡ كَرِهَ ٱلۡكَـٰفِرُونَ } [Surah At-Tawbah: 32]

[@user-zk1km8rr2h]

No it is the opposite. Islam was always a threat to the world and the west. You guys think the whole world should be Muslim so of course they will see you as a threat to their culture. If you have the chance you will put the Hijab on the lady of Liberty.

[@MAKMAUG]

maybe because the fundamentalist element you mentioned didnt become mainstream up until the 1980s and later. nearly every religion,culture is guilty of wanting to impose itself on others and in the case of islam,that idea had slowly started to die out till someone across the atlantic decided that they should use radical islam as a means to thwart socialism and communism in the wider muslim world.

[@Goen-pp4vi]

No Muslims don't want the world to be all Muslims. That is against islam and prophecies of islam, Nearly every nation that becomes a muslims kept their Culture, unlike the westreners, Who did not only wipe out other native cultures but stole their whole land and genocide 80% of them, The peak examples of The peaceful west are Canada, America and Australia

[@lotcam4046]

If Islam had been the threat then you would have lost the achievements of European civilization which was saven in the translations made in the Abbasid Caliphate, at the House Of Wisdom, Baghdad.

[@Zakariya3603]

But how is this different from whites wanting the whole world to be white? Your expansionism was based on your own racial predicament against other races, that of the Muslims was based on spreading a religious message and dispelling falsehoods and idols, based on that we can understand why a lot more people were ready to die for Islam than for white expansionism.

[@penguintaco9038]

The reverse actually

[@houseoffirebellytoads1439]

Yup.. they lie constantly

[@parjanyashukla176]

Hindus didn't have "better" relations with the British, only Sikhs had good relations with them. After 1857, Hindus fought the independence movement and Muslims largely kept out. In the eyes of most middle class Hindus, Muslim leaders were British stooges, so this in a sense completely contradicts what you mentioned in the video.

[@Itsover..866]

It's the reverse

[@Antiwesternthug]

its a threat to whole global south with its current leaders and policies, anyone who knows recent history and current geopolitics should be able to see it

[@caspersams6010]

The west has had the power to destroy/convert/replace every other civilization on the planet for 250 years. If Islamic civilization had that power, there would be no other civilizations, we’ve all seen what happens to people at the mercy of Muslims…

[@2460-1]

What is up with this comment section

[@Tathagata-eo5tz]

The British for the first time (in roughly 600 yrs.) liberated India (especially it's Hindu majority) from Islamic overlords and gave both Hindus and Muslims the opportunity of secular and scientific education as opposed to religious education. However, the reaction towards secular education was very different. The Hindus (mostly Hindu upper caste) embraced secular education after some resistance whereas Muslims mostly rejected secular education and even most Muslim upper-class families preferred to send their children to Madrassa instead. The result was that after roughly 150 years Indian Muslims significantly lagged behind their Hindu (upper caste) counter parts and this difference is still visible today in India (I mean partitioned/modern state of India). [One Pakistani intellectual named Parvez Hoodbhoy has also talked about this issue in some of his lectures]. The Hindus did NOT lose their culture or religion because of secular education (even when that secular education was being provided in a missionary run school) BUT Muslims lagged behind because of the fear that they will lose their culture/religion and to make matters worse many Muslims even today think that the "only way forward is backward" i.e. be better Muslims by following strict version of Islam or return back to the form of Islam during the times of the Prophet.

[@Handle0108]

because India was ruled by muslim dynasties for 800 years with armies who fought for islam. That is more than enough to call it islamic world.

[@muhammadadeel8639]

False - 2/3rd of India was ruled By Maratthas (Hindus), by the time British arrived. Britain invaded and defeated Hindu empire to colonize 2/3rd of India

[@Handle0108]

@@muhammadadeel8639 when people refer to Muslim India, they refer to territories ruled by Muslims for centuries with an undeniable Muslim history. Not southern Hindu territories or later conquests of Marathas towards the beginning of Colonialism.

[@Tathagata-eo5tz]

@@muhammadadeel8639 : I would like to know your source regarding the claim that "2/3 of India was ruled by Marathas". The Marathas did rule a large part of India however large percentage of population resides in Gangetic plains (which is also an agriculturally rich area) and it was ruled by Muslims 1) By Mughals 2) By Nawab of Awadh 3) By Nizam of Bengal, plus large land (and population) mass of South India was ruled by Muslims 1) Mysore sultanate 2) Nawab of cochin 3) Nizam of Hyderabad. The Marathas were powerful BUT were divided and as a matter-of-fact one group of Maratha clans helped the British fight against other Maratha clans and it was "only a matter of time" some other Muslim empire (I bet the Durranis since they had a large empire in North West) with the help of other Muslim rulers would have defeated the Marathas had the British not come and defeated the Marathas themselves. Anyway, don't you think that had British not come Hindus and Muslims would eventually have civil wars ??? Isn't it better to live in peace (even if that means colonialization and then partition) than to live in one civil war after another and be pons of global world powers ??

[@muhammadadeel8639]

@@Tathagata-eo5tz Subcontinent area = 4.4 Million km2. India area = 3.2 M km2. Marattha peak area = 2.5 M km2 as per wikipedia. So Marathas controlled 78% of India or 56% of subcontinent (India, Pak, Bengladesh). Both the Mughals and Nizam of hyderabad were under Maratha vassalage by the time Britain invaded. The Durranis were in decline after 1761, to the point that punjab and Kpk was snatched by the Sikh empire, limiting Durranis to Afghan territory only. Sikh were also beaten only by British, not by Durranis

[@alanshearer3682]

Make some new video about Middle East history

[@HikmaHistory]

Anything specific? Most of my recent vids have been about Middle Eastern history 😅

[@leflavius_nl5370]

Now the other way around.

[@iiwhite-shadowii9215]

I love videos keep uploading 🎉🔥😊🔥🫡💪🏻

[@070Jun070]

It’s more the other way around.

[@Handle0108]

how so? when westerners have been penetrating and interfering in the Islamic world for the last 200 years?

[@theuniverse5173]

Yes

[@АлександърСтойчев-ю1ю]

It's the other way around

[@grinningchicken]

Nawab Safawi and Ayatollah Khomeini seem influenced by Afghani

[@newbossbro3180]

Short answer: Yes Saved your 17 minutes

[@eddyr1041]

They still stuck there... romanticing on past history... is a long good one but passed... See budfhist confutianism ones... at least some country emerge from it like Taiwan Japan Korea etc. Don't wallow too much on those long great history if it's already stuck... The Buddhist Confuciusm ones that break free didn't. Not even 1 of islamic world break free like those...need reformation big time... to be non violence, non racist, progress😊

[@GamduchuBingshuti]

Evidently, yes.

[@ribeirojorge5064]

Freedom is not synonymous with Free Will Free Will presupposes having Awareness of Natural Laws and Knowledge of cause and effect and assuming Responsibility as a way of Achieving Sovereignty Freedom is the preferred flag of Edonists and those revolted against the Laws by the Virtuous and Noble Lie of Freedom just reach Voluntary Slavery

[@josephstalin839]

The real question is, is Islam a threat to itself?

[@Based_Proletariat]

Are you a anti Muslim islamophobe?

[@houseoffirebellytoads1439]

It is 😂

[@ZubairAhmed-od2xv]

That depends on what one Deems to be Islam...if its the secularised ,personalised religion of the masses ,which consists of a few acts of worship, that in the face of modernity are merely benign rituals..then no..but, if by Islam , you mean " The 'Deen" then yes , their has aleays existed and exists, a threat, which must be countered and parried. This however ,would require a Nation ,with all the sysyems and mechanisms of Governance, whose raison d'être is The Deen not merely a republic or a kingdom ,wherein the majority of its "subjects'" just so happen,by consequence of birth, to be muslims (in the nomonal sense) who practice a few beningn rituals a few times a day or once a year,while the country next door happens to ne starving to death!

[@morhafjamal7451]

If we do no refuse national states and forgion langues and westren lawes in our local scociaties in muslim siol we're going nowhere

[@magma9000]

Make a video on Pakistan history

[@FantomwithanEff]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂... Okay Pakistan history... Its just less than 80 years we are talking about history like you know like 1000s of years that shape not like 80 omg 😂😂😂😂

[@magma9000]

@@FantomwithanEff Hindu nationalist bot spotted

[@FantomwithanEff]

@@magma9000 🤣damn bro I am neither indian not Hindu

[@KanuniSuleyman4857]

​@@FantomwithanEff Then why western world see Pakistan as a threat to their dirty colonial ambitions?? 😂

[@FantomwithanEff]

@@KanuniSuleyman4857 who in this world is telling you that... In the western world where I am right now, no one sees Pakistan as anything more than something holding great nuisance value.. that's it..

[@Threeredbells]

Hasnt been for a long time however fearfully it does seem the lion is woken.

[@Threeredbells]

@@Adsper2000 the one that's not a dragon.

[@yendevus1747]

@@Adsper2000 Israel

[@AtheisRational8813]

How about the Russians The Chinese The N. Koreans. The Africanas n Many many others.???

[@matthewmelson1780]

Christ is King 👑🇻🇦

[@magma9000]

( PBUH )

[@Based_Proletariat]

Christ is a prophet

[@gadogadopedes2303]

Where is Christ in the West? All I see is family values breaking down: father becoming mother, mother becoming father, onlyfans sisters, materialism, churches either becoming pubs or mosques, atheism. That's not what Christ was about, but rather, Muslims will teach you what Christ was all about so that you abandon that evil system. Be patient, O westeners! .

[@Free-Ughyers_Free-Kashmir]

The God/Allah is the king. Jesus, peace be upon him, is an honorable prophet of The God

[@ish007]

You know i never understand christians. Im saying this with all respect and love. I liveed among christians my whole life. You Belief god let some humans crucify him ? Kill him ? Kill god ? Think about it. Doesnt make sense at all!

[@LimeyRedneck]

🤠💜

[@personal4528]

The most prosperous Muslims are either living in Christian counties, or got rich from selling oil to Christian countries.

[@AO00720]

you do love giving credit to yourselves. this was not the case and will certainly will never be the case in the near future.

[@VladVlad-ul1io]

Exactly :)

[@personal4528]

@@AO00720 oh yes I forgot: there is now a new category, Muslims making big buildings in the dessert to try attract westerners to spend their money.

[@Funplaying123]

Their is no Christian country 😂

[@Handle0108]

what christian nation? its a non-existent religion

[@kugakun2316]

Pajeeeeets and westrens crying in the comments

[@H09894]

We’re crying because it’s true that Islam isn’t compatible with the west?

[@abradolflincler726]

The opposite is true.

[@Fouzi707]

i believe we need secularism for a brief period so we can get rid of the tribalism and racism and ignorance then when we have educated ummah we can introduce the sharia

[@MAKMAUG]

islam and socialism were compatible and to some extent could go together with some aspects of western culture,but as we know that socialist muslims werent the ideal choice of pro american dictators in muslim countries or america in that case...

[@artair70]

lmao NO

[@batosato]

Will you cover the work of Muhammad Iqbal and his work on The reconstruction of religious thoughts in Islam?

[@HikmaHistory]

No immediate plans but at some point in the future, I don't see why I wouldn't make a video on Iqbal or the Pakistan movement.

[@jedimasterbones]

It is and I see no problem with it.

[@abdullahozek8016]

You called them imperialist infidels . ------------------------------------------------------------ But you never thought that the Western world and its People are " Ahlal Kitab " meaning The People of the Book. And you never thought of that, neither it's nature and Quranic approach to it.! And you never mentioned the idolator Muslim people.! Now the idolators in the Muslims world are a lot in numbers and power.

[@amuthi1]

We could acknowledge that a door-opener for imperialism in the north-african sphere were the unceasing ctivities of muslim pirates. Only Morocco kept its treaties with the west and therefore remained souvereign.

[@saudisinaudis]

All religions are dying

[@yendevus1747]

Don't tell that to internet religious people

[@hassansyed5036]

They are? Seems religions are just growing larger so far

[@yendevus1747]

@@hassansyed5036 Is that how you cope?

[@54032Zepol]

Where the evidence?​@@yendevus1747

[@mikexstad1121]

Good

[@lukaswilhelm9290]

In the age of globalization both westernization and Islam could co exist within one society if both parties agree to being respectful and know each others rights. What's left would be geopolitical fight between east vs west regardless of religion.

[@KanuniSuleyman4857]

Christians want all the world for themselves and wanted to take revenge on Muslims for conquering byzantine lands. That's why they started the Age of discovery and Industrial revolution to combat Islam through technology because they were preciously defeated in every war with Muslims on battlefield

[@muhammadadeel8639]

No, the financial empire of West is actively invading Muslim culture, religion, values, society via financial institutions, NGOs etc

[@zakback9937]

Westernisation has Alcohol, Usury, Gambling, Fornication and Feminism etc. The very things destroying the West and other lands.

[@jamesminor1945]

Islam and its achievements were influenced and taken by the West which is why most areas of mathematics and have Arabic names.

[@abdulHaqqqq]

nope Islam saved the west kzbin.info/www/bejne/eWmwZZxvm9ukZ68si=1hKt-wnF-hAqOLbd

[@Powerviolenc3]

Lies 😂 theybstole from persia and indian and claimed it islamic arabic

[@abdulHaqqqq]

@@Powerviolenc3 they stole nothing and those persians were Muslims who worked with the arabs to expand knowledge

[@andriyshepard3095]

@@abdulHaqqqq muslims or forcefully converted zoroastrians?

[@abdulHaqqqq]

@@andriyshepard3095 devout Muslims who contributed a lot to the Islamic cause. None were forced

[@Hun_ghuri]

Nope

[@barbg1485]

Nothing can threaten Islam

[@Chungus581]

Then why do you guys have to subjugate every religious minority you come across

[@hazemmansour6053]

Remind me again, what happened to the pagans

[@Chungus581]

@@hazemmansour6053 Muslims justifying their violence with the actions of other groups from 1,000 years ago speedrun (any %) The Muslims did the same exact thing to every pagan they came across in the MENA. The difference is you have to reach back centuries or a millennium while Cyprus just underwent Islamization and still is, Armenia is being ethnically cleansed of Armenian Christians, the Assyrians were/are forcibly displaced and ethnically cleansed by Muslims, the Maronites were/are forcibly displaced and ethnically cleansed by Muslims, the Copts are and were forcibly displaced and ethnically cleansed by Muslims, the Somalis tried to conquer and convert the Ethiopians but failed (lol) and now live in an abject shithole (lol)

[@countiblis1246]

I'm guessing the word Hubris is a bit too advanced for you.

[@Not-Ap]

Not even Allah?

[@yakoobma3053]

I will translate this video in Chinese

[@uptown_rider8078]

It’s the other way around

[@Nuh-zd5py]

Yes