Is Voting Halal or Haram/Shirk? - Ust. Abu Taymiyyah

[@tawheedfirst861]

Rejecting Taghut and their Systems is the condition of Tawheed Allah (SWT) said : "There is no compulsion in the deen, the right path has become distinct from the wrong path, whoever rejects Taghut, and believes in Allah, he has got a firm hold of the most trustworthy handhold that will never break, and Allah is the All hearing, all knowing."[2: 256]

[@lifeofabusymum9663]

❤

[@Allah1sthegreatest]

@@tawheedfirst861 “Indeed there has been an excellent example for you in Ibrahim (Abraham) and those with him, when they said to their people: ‘Verily, we are free from you and whatever you worship besides Allāh, we have rejected you, and there has started between us and you, hostility and hatred for ever, until you believe in (and worship) Allāh Alone…’” [Qur’an, Surah, 60: 4] “And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming):‘Worship Allāh (Alone), and reject (or keep away from) Taghut.)’” [Qur’ān, Surah 16: 36] “Allah is the Wali (Protector or Guardian) of those who believe. He brings them out from darkness into light. But as for those who disbelieve, their Auliya (allies, supporters and helpers) are Taghut [false deities and false leaders, etc.], they bring them out from light into darkness. Those are the dwellers of the Fire, and they will abide therein forever. ”[Quran, Surah, 2: 257] Have you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you, [O Muḥammad], and what was revealed before you? They wish to refer legislation to ṭāghūt,1 while they were commanded to reject it; and Satan wishes to lead them far astray 4.60 But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muḥammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission. 4.65

[@starkidforlife136]

No one is accepting taghut by trying to lesson the evil that Muslims face. Actions are based on intentions, how can someone genuinely trying to protect his brothers and sisters while hating the act of voting be equal to someone voting because he doesn’t to rule by Allah’s laws?

[@Joseph-wj1wr]

Better have a taghut than be in hell forever. Don't sell you deen for an easier life. In shaa Allah you will be rewarded for your Jihad or your patience if you can't.

[@britishqueen94]

@@starkidforlife136 Numpty did Taghout Qureshi ever offer Mohd saw ruling in their set up ??? The answer is yes.....what was Allahs revelation to this proposal to lessen the evil...read Surah Kaffiroun for the answer

[@IrjaRepeller]

We do have a 3rd option: not voting....

[@britishqueen94]

The Pratt is a Madkhali

[@_naalimit]

Not voting and staying armed crossed is not a solution.

[@britishqueen94]

@@_naalimit who said anything about arm crossed. Political activism without voting is a lot more effective.

[@IrjaRepeller]

@@_naalimit The solution is in the Sunnah and not shirk voting

[@thelaymenmuslim4603]

​@@_naalimit it IS a solution.. at least you do not bear the sin of shirk!

[@Allah1sthegreatest]

Lesser of the 2 evils is not to do the shirk in the first place

[@Mohammed5i]

SubhanAllah. Never thought of this. Makes you think how they use lesser of the two evils in this case

[@Ackermann55]

Exactly because matters in kufr and shirk never changes

[@Logos-TBE]

missed the entire point of the video… If you do NOT vote, a taghut will gain power. but if you do vote, perhaps a lesser taghut will gain power, and he will be better towards muslims than the one who wins due to your abstinence. If you live in a country where there are two candidates; one says he will ban hijab and close the masajid, and the other says he will preserve them. They are both democratic kuffar, but one is better for islam. If you do not vote, then the islamophobic one will win. will you now say it’s still kufr to vote for the one who will aid the deen? This is the point. Even tho installing a man made governance is kufr, someone who has no option but to live under it is not wrong for voting within it to support the muslims of the country. Allahu a3lam, but do not sit here and make blanket statements like you are qualified for it.

[@Mohammed5i]

@@Logos-TBE You do not commit kufr and shirk so that you may gain a few masjids. Kufr and shirk is a major issur above the things you are trying to solve by voting. Your argument makes no sense. Your basically saying lets commit kufr and shirk so that we remove something that is haram, or stop the ban on masjids. If there was no masaajids in your specific land - you can still pray in your homes. If they ban the hijab - women can stay at home or make hijra. None of your aruments allow one to commit shirk and kufr. The only possible reason that can be argued and taken to the scholars is if there is a real possibility of muslims being killed if they dont partake in these systems.

[@Allah1sthegreatest]

​@@Logos-TBEHave you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you, [O Muḥammad], and what was revealed before you? They wish to refer legislation to ṭāghūt, while they were commanded to REJECT IT; and Satan wishes to lead them far astray 4.60

[@Mixedblood82]

Secondly, the harm of voting in a democracy is so severe that it is affecting people's belief where they seek help and they see the current system as the only way to solve man's problems and the same people and scholars do not work for the re-implementation of Islam. This is evident. They have given up on this subject

[@mhmd_old7]

The scholars work based on the pre-existent rules and guidelines that already existed at the time of the prophet (صلى الله عليه و سلم). This re-implementation thing seems to be wanting to replace those guidelines with new ones, so I'd say to be careful about what you're saying there. If no one is implementing Islam today, it means all Muslims are kuffar, just interpreting this literally. And yes, there are scholars who spoke against democracy and the dangers and shirk of taking part in it outside of the guidelines they stated. Its not like this is a new system.

[@foufoua]

الله المستعان First abu taymiyyah confirmed that the only one who can make laws for the creation is Allah alone. So lawmaking falls under tawheed ar-rububiyyah. But after that he says that if there is a masla7a then you can chose another lawmaker beside Allah. Where in the quran or sunnah you can make masla7a for issues that falls under tawheed rububiya? So lets give an example for tawheed uluhiya so that you understand what i mean. We know that slaughtering is only for Allah and this falls under tawheed uluhiya. Can someone then say that out of masla7a you can slaughter for another besides Allah ?

[@ismailjaff]

Toooooo scared of Al salool the queen ben Sillyman son of Sillyman Al saood 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@abutalsafuba2179]

Moreover he said if its a case of the lesser of the 2 evils. Is there an evil greater than Shirk. How can a maslaha permit you to do shirk.

[@ismailjaff]

@@abutalsafuba2179 madkhalies

[@eliasziad7864]

This is absolutely stupid lol. Allah gave you a brain but you cannot use your intellect... Buddy, humans have been given the control of the Earth and can make the laws for society as long as it doesn't go against the religion. Allah does not intervene in what economics such as capitalism or communism or government systems that humans should have. Thats totally up to humans to decide for themselves, however, Allah intervenes in terms of religion. Stop your BS.

[@starkidforlife136]

What masla7a could exist in slaughtering in other than Allah SWT’s names? ​​⁠ No one is accepting taghut by trying to lesson the evil that Muslims face. Actions are based on intentions, how can someone genuinely trying to protect his brothers and sisters while hating the act of voting be equal to someone voting because he doesn’t to rule by Allah’s laws? Sharia says to not eat pork, taghut say eating pork is permissible; can someone eating pork because he is in danger and hates eating it be equal to someone who is enjoying disobeying the laws of Allah SWT?

[@seebawaiabdallah5289]

Alhamdullilaah. I am from Ghana. May increase you in taqwa and steadfastness in the deen.

[@The-Heart-Will-Testify]

I will never vote, I don't want blood on my hands.

[@hellohumans175]

👍

[@BenSolo2]

@@The-Heart-Will-Testify u still have blood on your hands when you pay tax 😭

[@The-Heart-Will-Testify]

@@BenSolo2 is being forced, I'm not agreeing to the decisions..u are not being forced to vote

[@madaxwayne]

@@BenSolo2 your forced to pay tax or face jail while voting is not by force

[@SeekeroftheHaqqq]

​@@madaxwayne we are willingly deciding to live in this country and abiding by its laws no one is forcing us to stay here, we have a choice to move to another country where we don't need to pay tax or is not used for genocide.

[@erminermin9825]

shirk is shirk, it's not depends of time,place, county....

[@mistama6605]

Surely the lessers of two evils scenario would only apply if we were forced to vote, right?

[@MujeebMemon-b4o]

This guy is an apologist of the deen. Don't listen to him. voting IS SHIRK

[@mohamedmuienudeen8992]

Choosing Lesser of the two evils applies when one of the two existing evils is the only possible outcome. And importantly lesser of two evils is not applicable to shirk/kufr. Since the greatest of the evils is shirk. Allah knows best

[@DailyDoseOfBelief]

Don't vote. When the person you voted for does wrong... You're the one who helped put him there. Every vote counts! Right!?

[@TesdrtHjug]

There is a 3rd option, don’t vote 👍🏼

[@rasmus4236]

The real option is Dastur al-Madina made by Muhammad saws. The best welfare government system where family, market and state is perfectly balanced. Feared by everyone that is corrupted and wants to take advantage of others or the general poplulation.

[@SNIPERS327]

By not voting you indirectly supported the person promoting genocide of Muslims and LGBT etc

[@k00lmoh]

​@@rasmus4236 you would need 1 leader not a thousand

[@rasmus4236]

@@k00lmoh you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. Dastur al-Madina ensures 1 leader and not a thousand

[@cabdiraxmaan3754]

​​@@rasmus4236there is nothing called dastur al madina, there was wathiqa ( agreement paper) b/w prophet & jewish on how to safeguard the city under the hukum of prophet mohamed salahu aleyhi wasalam. When the jewish violated the terms of agreement they have been evacuated from the city and some of them have been killed for their treasory. That was all

[@timmytab2836]

Thank you for speaking some logic. Why would Muslims not vote to punish genocide supporters and thereby indirectly support our brothers and sisters in Palestine

[@az71003]

vote green they support palestine!!

[@YoussefLouati-eo8lc]

He is calling to kufr. Because when you vote in the west, you have to understand the reality. You're not simply voting for a leader, but rather you are voting for a deputy who will go to the legislating chambers that will propose/vote laws that goes against the Shari'ah. Abu Taymiyyah said it himself, legislating is a right that belongs to Allah alone so he who legislates with other than what Allah legislated has claimed something that belongs to Allah alone and has claimed rububiyyah which makes him a taghut, a false diety. And if you vote for tawagheet you are essentialy voting for another false god which is kufr. It is equivalent to do a vote on who to bow to and ask rizq. Except that instead of sujood and rizq, it is hakimiyyah.

[@sreekrishnan9120]

It's haram to vote in the west but halal to live,eat, reproduce and poop in the west !! 👏

[@MK-pp6ui]

Elhamdulilah Brother may Allah Azzawajal bless you many muslims have a Big misconception about this topic. Hikmayah / following the sharia is an ibada and we only make ibada to Allah Azzawajal and not to another Person. That doesnt allow you to vote because there is no sharia yet ( in sha Allah son). So a muslim isnt allow to vote on These election of the kufar

[@certes7920]

It's even worse than that, because if the winning candidate will be a taghout, what about those who voted for him? Democracy offers them the power of legislation and they chose to use that power through the vote, delegating it to someone who will exercise this power on their behalf. I just don't have words for how deeply this issue have entered into our Ummah. And I blame 'ulamas that are right on this matter to not be more vocal. WaLlahu'l musta3an.

[@fulan03]

He didn't call to anything he only mentioned why some scholars allowed it

[@MahayarMuttaqin-fn9ko]

​@@fulan03what are their arguments for allowing it?

[@yoori6836]

Please it would be really amazing if you uploaded more of you reciting quran برواية خلف عن حمزة especially surah البقرة Your recitation helped me alot with saving the Quran

[@tayyabkhan4440]

If these questions are still topics of serious discussion then we have our reason why we are being butchered by others. We are stuck in the 1600s and they are asking about quantum physics

[@robertpineda2858]

My sentiments exactly. I have said this hundreds of times before. We are debating mundane problems of medieval times, while the west is on the verge of artificial intelligence and sending humans to other planets. It’s pathetic.

[@user-ny5pt7hf9i]

This is a super strange stance to take but makes sense if you don’t realise nor understand that Islam is a way of life, the only religion that stands for and makes sense for eternity. The rulings put in place back then are what will help societies and communities thrive now and forever. Allaah always knows best. Nothing needs upgrading or updating.

[@mohamedmuienudeen8992]

​​@@robertpineda2858what you are propagating is the exact problem not the solution. Forgetting about islam and imitating the kuffàr and Muslim giving precedence to world benefits and luxury rather than striving in the path of Allah ta'ala to make his religion victory. This is why we have been humiliated on hands of kuffàr since Muslim abandoned their religion. At the same time Muslim ruled the globe in medieval times because they are upon islam and striving to make the religion of islam superior unlike the present time Muslims who settled in west and whose main goal in life is filling their bellies.... pathetic!!! Imagine living a life with having only one goal of eating food and having a house!!!!! Going to club on Sundays!!!!!!. Animals have better purpose in life than these creatures!!!

[@mohamedmuienudeen8992]

Muslim are far rich and educated and have degrees and "qualifications" and what all these leads to other than humiliated on the hands of kuffàr as we are seeing now. You don't liberate masjid al aqŝa by studying quantum physics..... neither the secular education which you revere as your purpose of existence gonna teach you how to liberate Muslim lands, if not they teach you how to serve the jèw¡sh or amêr¡can state. Islam does teach it how to!! Unless untill we follow it, you only end up living and working as slaves of jèwish and chrîstians occupation by serving their countries and economy rather than serving for islam to make it victorious and to raise the honour of Muslims

[@sami123yz]

Says the man who views things with western perspective

[@AbuAbdillah1413]

The Scholars from Egypt make inkar of the one who comes out and says it is wajib to vote, something never said before, another important thing to highlight is the hukm of the muslims entering politics in becoming politicians. Top Reputable Muhaditheen say this in and of itself is kufr because a person will be partaking in majalis of legislation and a system based on nothing but kufr and in reality there is no true benefit it is all speculative

[@k00lmoh]

Interesting

[@bny7y]

BarakAllahu fik

[@Mohammed5i]

Salam alaykum bro. The ustadh in the video was talking about mafsada and maslaha. Wouldnt this topic (democracy and voting) come under the principle of ad daruurah instead? Or are these principles the same thing? Shouldnt the ustadh have mentioned this principle more because it truly gives us the understanding when its permissble to vote ie when muslims are actually facing life n death situations. Which majority of muslims in these western societys arent.

[@Mohammed5i]

I feel like those deviants who call people towards democracy and voting use the principle of mafsada and maslaha and dupe the masses. Muslims are led to believe theres more pros than cons so that gives us legitmacy in taking part. But if they used the principle of ad daruurah they wouldnt take part because they arent facing life n death situations. I hope im making sense

[@therighteousrighthand]

Voting is definitely haram. When we vote we are actively participating in a non shariah practice.

[@Jack-et4ev]

People will always construe what he says. He gave a 13 minute lecture about the entire topic, its history, its beginning, the rules, the fatawah and people still want to twist the words. He was clear and precise, I see now why it could be extremely frustrating for him to give daawah whilst being slandered

[@abduljalilmusah3935]

Alhamdulillah from Ghana 🇬🇭

[@الالعربي]

Al hamdulilah from Texas

[@busterbaxter2319]

Honestly I thought you'd choose the famous classic salafi opinion of tahrim the vote. Happy your more open than some others

[@Mixedblood82]

I love the shake but I will disagree with him on the following When you can make an exemption to the wall, you can't make it based on any benefits. There is no evidence for this and this is this pure man-made opinion. Everything that has been used has been related to life and death scenarios in our current reality that does not happen

[@longegg-wind9577]

Some scholars said voting is allowed in specific circumstances, but which reputable scholar gave the fatwa to vote in the upcoming elections in the UK? I want to know that before I vote

[@Mohammed5i]

None. You will find amongst the people who call towards taking part push a certain individual by the name of haitham al haddad. This individual is a ikhwani and should be boycotted.

[@CLICKSET_DRIPSET]

Are yu braindead? Yu only care about scholars when the Lord of the worlds has said he is the only legislator???? Audubillah

[@MenkIsAMubtadiiDeobandi]

​​الحمدلله @@Mohammed5i that people are knowing his reality now. His student is zaid el oma.r

[@eliasziad7864]

Do you worship the scholars or do you not use your intellect?

[@mabrouk642]

​@@Mohammed5iRefrain from labelling people akhi, unless it is a case of clear cut.

[@mr.dev-wpcoach6156]

When they offered to our Prophet p.u.b.h to be the head of the that-time parliament, to give him the best doctors, the best women, just so they worship Allah first year but next year their gods, wasn't that the lesser evil for the companions and their families?! Couldn't they use that year by worshiping Allah to beat the enemies and never worship their idols?! But instead our Prophet peace and blessings be upon him denied that because it CONTAINED SHIRK, similar with the voting you are giving permission to mere humans to give / create / rule by laws which will certainly end up for the bad for the muslims, by hosting pride parades, by bombing children, by allowing haram and forbidding halal. Its simple math.

[@ArifToro]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iKK2lGp7fMaUm7Mfeature=shared Sheikh al Albaanis view on the topic

[@nomadbiker4040]

What is the ruling on elections and voting in them? The eminent scholar Muḥammad Nāṣir ud-Dīn al-Albānī was asked the following question: What is the ruling on elections and voting in them, and what is the evidence for that? And what is the alternative if they are not permissible? Questioner: "The first question, our Shaikh, is a bit long but has an explanation, in shā Allāh. It says, we are now approaching parliamentary elections -may Allāh grant us and you well-being-. Most people in this era are living through a period where tribulations have swept over them. We can almost say that these tribulations are shaping society and leading it with its severe currents, causing people to adapt in a non-Islamic way. As a result, even the scholar, before the layman, points to the legitimacy of these elections, claiming that if we leave the matter like this, the Muslim who should not be in power will have complete dominance." Shaikh al-Albānī: It is not suitable that ...? Questioner: A Muslim who is either a socialist or like him, that is to say- a disbeliever, and they want to change things. The disbeliever will have complete dominance-and I emphasize the word complete-while participation for Muslims grants us a share of authority that gives the Muslim some of his demands and preserves some of his rights. Therefore, based on the principle that "What is necessary to fulfill an obligation is itself an obligation," participating in elections almost becomes obligatory. So, I would like you -may Allāh reward you-, to clarify for us the Sharia evidence on the issue of elections, participation in them, and voting. And what is the alternative in this case? May Allāh reward you. Shaikh al-Albānī: We have discussed this matter repeatedly and said: Participation in elections is a form of inclination towards those who oppress. This is because the system of parliaments and elections, is believed, as far as I know, by every Muslim who has a sound understanding of Islamic education, every Muslim knowns that it is not an Islamic system. However, at the same time, I believe that many who have some degree of engagement with Islamic education mistakenly think that the parliament is like the consultative council (Shura) of Muslims. This is not the case at all. Some mistakenly think that the parliament, translated as the "Council of the Nation," resembles the Shura council, the consultative body that we are commanded to uphold in the Book of Allāh and the hadīth of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ and it's not like that at all. This becomes evident to every insightful Muslim in many ways, the most important of which is that these parliaments are not based on the Book of Allāh and the Sunnah of His Messenger ﷺ. Rather, we can say that they are not based on any of the recognized Islamic schools of thought, as was the case in the Ottoman era. During the Ottoman era, they governed according to the school of al-Imām Abū Hanīfah -may Allāh have mercy on him-. While we neither prefer nor favor this over what we call people to - which is to judge according to the Book and the Sunnah - there is a significant difference between that system, which was based on the opinion of one of the trusted independent jurists (mujtahidīn), and these parliaments based on non-Islamic systems that do not believe in Allāh and His Messenger, from one perspective. Rather, they are the foremost who fall under the category described in the saying of the Most High: { قَـٰتِلُوا۟ ٱلَّذِینَ لَا یُؤۡمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَلَا بِٱلۡیَوۡمِ ٱلۡـَٔاخِرِ وَلَا یُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ ٱللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُۥ وَلَا یَدِینُونَ دِینَ ٱلۡحَقِّ مِنَ ٱلَّذِینَ أُوتُوا۟ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ حَتَّىٰ یُعۡطُوا۟ ٱلۡجِزۡیَةَ عَن یَدࣲ وَهُمۡ صَـٰغِرُونَ } Fight against those who do not believe in Allāh or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allāh and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth [i.e., Islām] from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. [9 ,29] It's astonishing how some Muslims wish to belong to a parliament governed by the laws of those whom we are commanded to fight. Thus, there is a stark contrast between this parliamentary system and its participants, if I may use the term, and the Islamic consultative council (Shura). This is the first point. Secondly, the Shura council is not open to every Muslim; rather, it specifically includes the elite of the nation- infact we may say, it is open to the especially elite of the nation; the scholars and dignitaries. On the other hand, parliament is inclusive of all and sundry, together with Muslims, polytheists, and atheists. This is because parliament operates through elections where individuals, including men and of late women as well, from both Muslim and non-Muslim backgrounds, can nominate themselves. There is a significant difference between the Islamic Shura council and what is referred to today as parliament. Even if elections were conducted entirely freely, as they claim, allowing people to freely choose their representatives to address their issues and problems, the matter would be much simpler than it currently is. So how is it, when in every country, without exception, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, votes are bought and consciences are sold? How can Muslims govern under such elections, which are described in such negative terms?! That's what can be said based on what I understood from one part of the question. As for the second part, that is, I may say it is a tendency in these times referred to as 'What is the alternative'? A very simple word, and because of its simplicity, the weak resort to it-the weak among people and those who have strayed from the guidance of the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet, peace be upon him ﷺ-. They want to achieve an alternative overnight. Recently, we had a discussion about banks, more specifically, Islamic banks, and we clarified that there is no difference between these banks that raise the Islamic banner and British or American banks at all because the system is the same. Unfortunately, the bank that declares itself as an Islamic bank may be more dangerous than other banks, whether British or American, because these banks hide behind the guise of Islam. They act like the Jews, those whom the Book and the Sunnah have warned us against following their ways, especially the well-known clear hadīth in al-Bukhārī where the Prophet, peace be upon him ﷺ, said: لَتَتْبَعُنَّ سَنَنَ مَنْ كَانَ قَبْلَكُمْ شِبْرًا شِبْرًا وَذِرَاعًا بِذِرَاعٍ، حَتَّى لَوْ دَخَلُوا جُحْرَ ضَبٍّ تَبِعْتُمُوهُمْ ‏"‏‏.‏ قُلْنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ الْيَهُودُ وَالنَّصَارَى قَالَ ‏"‏ فَمَنْ؟ The Prophet ﷺ said, "You will follow the ways of those nations who were before you, span by span and cubit by cubit (i.e., inch by inch) so much so that even if they entered a hole of a lizard, you would follow them." We said, "O Allāh's Messenger ﷺ! (Do you mean) the Jews and the Christians?" He said, "Whom else?" I said on this occasion, either last night or the night before, I stated that we are often asked in such circumstances about the alternative to these banks, which we condemn for engaging in interest-based transactions forbidden by the Quran and Sunnah. They ask, "What is the alternative?" I said, and I say here, aiming as they say, to hit two birds with one stone. The alternative is in the words of Allāh, the Exalted: { وَمَن یَتَّقِ ٱللَّهَ یَجۡعَل لَّهُۥ مَخۡرَجࣰا ¤ وَیَرۡزُقۡهُ مِنۡ حَیۡثُ لَا یَحۡتَسِبُۚ} And whosoever fears Allâh and keeps his duty to Him, He will make for him a way out. And will provide for him from where he percieves not. [65:2-3] The alternative is the fear of Allāh, the Mightyand Majestic. Undoubtedly, fearing Allāh requires, first and foremost, beneficial knowledge and, secondly, righteous deeds coupled with this beneficial knowledge. Neither righteous deeds can suffice without beneficial knowledge, nor can beneficial knowledge suffice without righteous deeds. It is essential to combine both. For Muslims to achieve this taqwā of Allāh, which encompasses beneficial knowledge and righteous deeds, it requires tremendous and concerted efforts among the scholars who are responsible for teaching and conveying Islām, and the masses who are obliged to implement this knowledge. When the general Muslim populace interacts with their scholars-these scholars spreading knowledge and the masses acting upon it-then the believers will rejoice at the victory granted by Allāh, the Exalted. With this, I conclude the answer to that question. The alternative, therefore, is a return to Islam. The alternative is a return to understanding and practicing Islam. Translated by Abū 'Aṭīyah 27/12/1445H.

[@tradingeldin7447]

So lesser of two evils: Party A: ruling by man made laws Party B: ruling by man made laws but with friendly colors What about option 3 of not voting at all? Certainly that is a option as well as the first two option in basis are haram and option 3 of not voting is not haram.

[@canyouhandlethetruth8682]

YOU TOOK THE WORDS OUT OF MY MOUTH BRO

[@papasul29]

Soooo agree 👍. I was thinking the same thing. I find it interesting he dint say if you dont like the 2 evils that you can just not pick or vote for either of them

[@visitor5198]

@@papasul29 rewatch the video with the intention to listen not hear

[@kaa7728]

Whether you vote or not the elected government will still govern you

[@absurdistt]

Dosent inaction enable evil to thrive and as such, lead for more fitnah to come about ,no ?

[@fulanibnalan]

It is well known that the companions رضي الله عنهم were tortured and killed and the messenger ﷺ had the chance to change this by giving giving up on prohibiting the worship of idols and calling people to tawheed. Everyone knows that he ﷺ kept patient and continued to call the people to لا اله الا الله. Who would dare to compare his situation to that of our beloved peophet ﷺ and his companions? How can we choose to commit an act of kufr just so we don't have to fear that our masjid is closed or so? Those who really have to fear something don't even have an option to vote like our brothers and sisters in Shaam, China or Burma for example. Allah عز وجل will help us if we believe in Him and worship Him alone and disassociate from Taghut. { وَعَدَ ٱللهُ ٱلَّذِینَ ءَامَنُوا۟ مِنكُمۡ وَعَمِلُوا۟ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ لَیَسۡتَخۡلِفَنَّهُمۡ فِی ٱلۡأَرۡضِ كَمَا ٱسۡتَخۡلَفَ ٱلَّذِینَ مِن قَبۡلِهِمۡ وَلَیُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمۡ دِینَهُمُ ٱلَّذِی ٱرۡتَضَىٰ لَهُمۡ وَلَیُبَدِّلَنَّهُم مِّنۢ بَعۡدِ خَوۡفِهِمۡ أَمۡنࣰاۚ یَعۡبُدُونَنِی لَا یُشۡرِكُونَ بِی شَیۡـࣰٔاۚ وَمَن كَفَرَ بَعۡدَ ذَ ٰ⁠لِكَ فَأُو۟لَـٰۤىِٕكَ هُمُ ٱلۡفَـٰسِقُونَ } [Sūrah An-Nūr: 55]

[@SNIPERS327]

I say vote for Independent Muslim MPs, not for Muslims associated with Labour or Conservatives

[@ozzieone16]

What will they do? They are not doing anything for Muslims they like all the others are using Palestine for votes they know very well they can mention it but nothing will happen but they make their voters believe otherwise

[@fulan03]

and who are you to give this fatwa

[@Yousef_7342]

@@fulan03exactly

[@ozzieone16]

@@SNIPERS327 What are they going to do?

[@SNIPERS327]

​@@fulan03. And who are you to give fatwa??? Have you studied this according to what the scholars of said on this or you following young spuds on KZbin! So you want to give vote to people who support LGBT and Genocide!

[@6patell]

If you don’t vote arnt you helping oppressors to win by not voting against them for someone with better policies

[@bekiraltindal9053]

If we Muslims don't vote, do you think others will vote in our favor? No, they will vote for a person or party that is against Muslims. A Muslim who doesn't vote, votes for the worst option - Sheiykh Ali Haydar.

[@AbuBakr-Siddiq]

That guys a jahil then or you've got him out of context. You can only vote under a country which follows Allahs sharia. Not some man made law like the UK. Allah is the only legislator

[@bekiraltindal9053]

@@AbuBakr-Siddiq First of all, are you currently fighting against the UK? No. Therefore your suggested rule doesn't apply at all. Right now you and about 70 million other people are living in peace in the UK. Now imagine a hypocritical scenario. There are 4 people who are allowed to vote. Two of them Muslims, two of them who hate Islam. If Muslims follow your logic, especially in a country like UK, and don't vote, who will win the election? Someone who bans the Hijab. Someone who closes mosques. Someone who supports Israel. And many more. We Muslims keep complaining about "why are we so weak and cannot Help our Brothers and Sisters in Gaza and other places?". That is exactly why. We give all the Power to our haters and complain. I am sorry, but we muslims are all together very very very stupid, except for the people in Gaza. Why do we muslims think Allah challenges the Palestinians with such a tough Challenge and Not us? Well, simply, because we are total idiots when it comes to succesfully beating such tough challenges. Also Look at the Last elections in Türkiye. About 6 million Muslims didn't go to vote. Guess who got most of the votes for a change? The CHP. It is well known that the CHP hates Islam. Thankfully These were Just the local elections. Yeah. So much to Muslims who think very highly of themselves, Like they have been spoonfed taqwa from the beginning. Literally we are Shooting our own legs and complain about it. Also, Just think about it for one second. Really Just Stop and think about it for one second. Who doesn't want Muslims to be in Power? Probably all the Queen Elizabeths. Probably the majority in the whole world. The CIAs, the MOSSADs, the MI6s, the Lawrence of Arabias. One Last information. The information you are sharing is spread by the Same people who also brought down the Khilafet. Since the Khilafet died we muslims are miserable all around the world.

[@bekiraltindal9053]

@@AbuBakr-Siddiq Also, here is an example where your suggested rule applies. Did you know that USA and Israel tried to organize an election in northern Syria? With this election, they wanted to claim that the terrorist groups such as PKK/YPG and their allies SDF (Syrian Democratic Forces) have their own state and are now official governments instead of just... groups. Guess who stopped this madness. Erdogan. Guess again who voted for Erdogan. Muslims. We absolutely did the right thing there by voting for someone who literally says stop at Israel, USA, Russia and even China. Baby steps. Before my fellow know-it-all-i-am-better-muslim-than-everyone-else-even-though-i-dont-even-pray-because-my-heart-is-clean-and-Allah-only-looks-for-the-hearts turkish people chime in, like they usually do, Türkiye did suggest to the arabic League, right after the 7th October, to collectively send a force, an army, to Gaza who will stop Israel and maintain a peaceful situation. Unfortunately this suggestion got rejected. I have to mention this because there are a Lot of people in Türkiye who act Like they Care about Gaza, criticize Erdogan, don't even boycott Israeli products, and actually only Care about Gaza because they Hope it will increase their votes or popularity, like the politician Fatih Erbakan. Not to be confused with His father Necmettin Erbakan, who was a righteous and honest man.

[@mohammedmufreh1693]

Can you not say that staying away of these legislaters is principle of Islam

[@ismailjaff]

To scared

[@syedshahid1196]

Pork is cheaper than zabiha so I can eat pork and donate The savings to charity

[@abuhudaifah_0]

The ruling on parliaments is that they are not allowed and they are places of Shirk and Kufr, and we see them as Thaghut because they are places of legislation and of making laws and judging by other than what Allah has sent down (the Shariah). And the basis of parliaments and democracy is “judgment of the people for the people” and the people are the ones who legislate through their representatives who are called “parliamentarians”. And this goes against singling out Allah alone for judging and legislating and ordering and forbidding. Allah says: إن الحكم إلا لله “The judgment is for none but Allah” Surat Al An’am 6:57 And it (judgment) is not for the people. And Allah says: أفحكم الجاهلية يبغون “Do they then seek the judgement of (the Days of) Ignorance?” Surat al Ma’idah 5:50 And Allah says: ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا “He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.” Surat Al Kahf 18:26 It is not for the parliament, or for the people, or for anyone. As for the claim of the one who says that the foundation of democracy and parliaments is established upon Shura (Islamic consultation) then this is either lie and deceit or ignorance and misguidance. It is not established upon the Islamic Shura, rather it is based on legislation, and they consult amongst themselves not on those issues that are permitted, rather they consult in order to legislate laws that contradict the Shariah. And this is the reality of them. As for the ruling on those who enter them (parliaments), then there are some details to this: 1) If he enters them and legislates man made laws which contradict the Shariah, or agrees to or is pleased with a law that contradicts the Shariah or votes for it, then this person is a Mushrik (Polytheist) Kaafir (Disbeliever), and he is not excused for ignorance or misinterpretation or (for considering it as bringing) benefits. Allah says: أم لهم شركاء شرعوا لهم من الدين ما لم يأذن به الله “Or do they have partners (false gods) with Allah, who have legislated for them a religion which Allah has not allowed?” Surat Ash Shuraa 42:21 And Allah says: إن الحكم إلا لله “The judgment is for none but Allah” Surat Al An’am 6:57 And Allah says: ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا “He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.” Surat Al Kahf 18:26 2) If he enters and swears to respect the Kufr constitution knowing that the constitution contradicts the Shariah, then this is Kufr (disbelief) and Riddah (apostasy), whether he was serious (in his oath) or not, and whether it was done for benefit or not. He has indeed committed this act of Kufr by choice, knowingly and intentionally. And he is like the one who takes an oath to respect Al Laat and Al Uzza, or takes an oath to respect the laws of the Quraish during the time of the Messenger, sallallahu alayhi wa sallam. 3) He does not take an oath to respect the constitution, and does not legislate or participate in legislation which contradicts the Shariah, but he rejects that and votes against it - this person is mistaken and misguided and he goes against the guidance of the Messenger sallallahu alayhi wa sallam in bringing change and reform and in establishing the Islamic State, but he is not a Kaafir even though he has taken a path of misguidance and Shirk as a path for Dawah and bringing change and refThe ruling on parliaments is that they are not allowed and they are places of Shirk and Kufr, and we see them as Thaghut because they are places of legislation and of making laws and judging by other than what Allah has sent down (the Shariah). And the basis of parliaments and democracy is “judgment of the people for the people” and the people are the ones who legislate through their representatives who are called “parliamentarians”. And this goes against singling out Allah alone for judging and legislating and ordering and forbidding. Allah says: إن الحكم إلا لله “The judgment is for none but Allah” Surat Al An’am 6:57 And it (judgment) is not for the people. And Allah says: أفحكم الجاهلية يبغون “Do they then seek the judgement of (the Days of) Ignorance?” Surat al Ma’idah 5:50 And Allah says: ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا “He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.” Surat Al Kahf 18:26 It is not for the parliament, or for the people, or for anyone. As for the claim of the one who says that the foundation of democracy and parliaments is established upon Shura (Islamic consultation) then this is either lie and deceit or ignorance and misguidance. It is not established upon the Islamic Shura, rather it is based on legislation, and they consult amongst themselves not on those issues that are permitted, rather they consult in order to legislate laws that contradict the Shariah. And this is the reality of them. As for the ruling on those who enter them (parliaments), then there are some details to this: 1) If he enters them and legislates man made laws which contradict the Shariah, or agrees to or is pleased with a law that contradicts the Shariah or votes for it, then this person is a Mushrik (Polytheist) Kaafir (Disbeliever), and he is not excused for ignorance or misinterpretation or (for considering it as bringing) benefits. Allah says: أم لهم شركاء شرعوا لهم من الدين ما لم يأذن به الله “Or do they have partners (false gods) with Allah, who have legislated for them a religion which Allah has not allowed?” Surat Ash Shuraa 42:21 And Allah says: إن الحكم إلا لله “The judgment is for none but Allah” Surat Al An’am 6:57 And Allah says: ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا “He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.” Surat Al Kahf 18:26 2) If he enters and swears to respect the Kufr constitution knowing that the constitution contradicts the Shariah, then this is Kufr (disbelief) and Riddah (apostasy), whether he was serious (in his oath) or not, and whether it was done for benefit or not. He has indeed committed this act of Kufr by choice, knowingly and intentionally. And he is like the one who takes an oath to respect Al Laat and Al Uzza, or takes an oath to respect the laws of the Quraish during the time of the Messenger, sallallahu alayhi wa sallam. 3) He does not take an oath to respect the constitution, and does not legislate or participate in legislation which contradicts the Shariah, but he rejects that and votes against it - this person is mistaken and misguided and he goes against the guidance of the Messenger sallallahu alayhi wa sallam in bringing change and reform and in establishing the Islamic State, but he is not a Kaafir even though he has taken a path of misguidance and Shirk as a path for Dawah and bringing change and reform. Allah says: فماذا بعد الحق إلا الضلال “And what is after truth, except falsehood” Surat Yunus 10:32 And we have discussed this issue in our book “Al Jam’u wa Thajreed Fee Sharh Kitaab At Tawheed” in the chapter “The call to Tawheed”, and it is the issue of the ruling on entering the parliaments” - Shaykh ‘Alî Bin Khudayr al-Khudayr (fak’Allāhu asrahū)orm. Allah says: فماذا بعد الحق إلا الضلال “And what is after truth, except falsehood” Surat Yunus 10:32 And we have discussed this issue in our book “Al Jam’u wa Thajreed Fee Sharh Kitaab At Tawheed” in the chapter “The call to Tawheed”, and it is the issue of the ruling on entering the parliaments” - Shaykh ‘Alî Bin Khudayr al-Khudayr (fak’Allāhu asrahū)

[@kemchy3838]

For those who say its kufr coz its man made laws. Perhaps they should migrate to a place that is governed by the laws of Allah

[@sakhter4044]

But the uk is not a muslim state so what can muslims do and why do muslim countries not help follow muslims so they can go there instead of non muslim countries.

[@eltumi2131]

When you watch him talking and body language he expresses, your mind recalls Dr Shiekh Mohamed Alsherief may Allah release him from the oppressors prison. (With respect to the huge difference in levels of knowledge and wisdom)

[@justmeldin6062]

It is not true that this predicament is unique to this time. Muslims had to deal with Mongols and their law from Jasiq who at the time apparently accepted Islam but scholars like ibn Taymiyya rahimehullah made takfir on them unless they accept sharia and judge with it. Ibn Kethir rahimehullah spoke of this as well. There are other examples. None from the salaf or khalef made any excuse or provided any leeway in this matter. It is a form of Shirk which you can do only in state of Ikrah. In matters like this there is no maslaha. Imagine if people as collective decide to chose which members of ruling elite of mongols will be allowed to decide what set of halal and haram will be applied over them. We are not even forced to vote today, it is all based on illusion that it will be better. The illusion of choice. It is like if they said: if you people make sajdah to idol we will be better to you muslims, we will not invade your lands that often and will not put laws to make your life a little bit harder. Maybe we will not pursue the policy of deportation to your original lands where you came from.

[@DeitritusFillamore]

This is false. Ibn Taymiyya made takfir of the mongols for their siding with the kuffar against the Muslims

[@justmeldin6062]

@@DeitritusFillamore That as well, it is separate mes'ela.

[@DeitritusFillamore]

@@justmeldin6062this is incorrect. Takfir was made because the mongols preferred their yassa code over the sharia and considered it better. Nobody here is claiming to prefer American/British law over the shariah

[@alimbonzaj7021]

@@DeitritusFillamoreThen why do you vote. Democracy is shirk and your feelings don’t matter. The moment you vote for it you have made your decision. You people are playing with something and taking it lightly that is considered as Shirk.

[@abutalsafuba2179]

​@DeitritusFillamore They legislated by both the Quran and Yasiq. The takfir was made due their legislation by the Yasiq. There was no need for a verbal proclamation of their preference to Yasiq over the Quran.

[@CNGRYDER]

SubanAllah do any of our scholars know how politics works. This is the problem they dont understand politics based on that they give the wrong hukum. We need scholars who actually have political background and understanding especially western politics.

[@abdladigun6436]

How much of the Quran have you memorized? Before you try to disrespect the scholars knowledge fix yourself.

[@fouedw5994]

not neessarily to hold a phd ! if you understand that democracy makes halal haram and haram halal and is led by tawaghits - governors, judges.... then... we easily understand we MUST reject this koufr system, his actors and whoever promote democracy ignoring it true faces and realities..... .. convinced ?

[@michaellynch1085]

The warding off of evil takes precedence of bringing about good - how do we apply this

[@techbetold]

Abu Sa’id al-Khudri reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever among you sees evil, let him change it with his hand. If he cannot do so, then with his tongue. If he cannot do so, then with his heart, which is the weakest level of faith.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 49 so it’s time to vote and change the status quo. workers party (galloways party) is pro islam.

[@certes7920]

Do you realise that you imply that exclusiveness of tashri3 is a variable, and does not belong to Allah in our current era and circumstances ?? You're not able to promote a specific candidate, which is one of many proofs that it's not about the lesser of 2 evils, otherwise you would clearly call to vote for one. If you can't then there's no clear maslaha. As for Ibn Taymiya's fatwa, was it about someone who will have to make bay'a to a taghut king and constitution, or was it someone who will have freedom to apply Allah's law within his perimeter of action (like prophet Yusuf 'alayhi salam)? Is any candidate today able to implement any part of the shari'a in the UK? The biggest mafsada today is really to take that power of legislation that democracy wants to give us, through the vote, where it only belongs to Allah. The biggest maslaha is to avoid it and find other ways to have a political impact. It is so irresponsible to call for lesser of 2 evils when most of your audience haven't disavowed democracy in the first place. And this is on the shoulders of 'ulamas and preachers who never talk about the kufr of democracy as a political system. As for those who see democracy as a good system, la a3budu ma ta3budun.

[@samsalp503]

Shaykh, we waited very long for a new video. 🌹

[@Moravia13th]

If you can overthrow democracy and get Sharia, good for us. If you live in a country and by elections we can get a president who can introduce Sharia, good for us. You need to cast your vote. If you live in a country and there is Democracy and that countries leader is hurting your Muslim brothers and sisters in another country, what would you do to keep him from re-elected? I would commit sin, just to do a good deed for my brothers and sisters. And if I have to go to hell for it, so be it. However, Allah is forgiving and most merciful. In the end Allah knows best.

[@LeicesterLion]

The candidate in Leicester that he gave as an example is called Shockat Adam btw I've truly never seen anything like it

[@sergeyastov6353]

What about her ? Why are you so shocked? , pray tell .....

[@jtb229]

He isn’t qualified to speak on these issues, whether he is for or against them. Seek guidance from the Mufti; we have hundreds of trusted institutions, such as Darul Iftaa in Egypt, Jordan, and more. We are placing matters of religion in the hands of children who lack traditional study or Sanad.

[@WillScarlet1991]

Have those institutions in Egypt and Jordan spoken en masse about their countries supporting Israel?

[@ismailjaff]

​@@WillScarlet1991😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 people prefer to be blind this days 😂😂😂😂😂 they dont want to see the Light when you are pointing with your finger to the moon in the darkest place they just simply will close they eyes and they will respond I dont see the moon I cant see it

[@nomadbiker4040]

May Allaah taalaa guide those muftis and leaders to the truth, that is the quraan and sunnah upon the understanding of the salaf as saalih

[@abdola-g6v]

Even within a country of people who didn't believe in Allah, prophet Yusuf (AS) asked to take charge of preventing hunger in the land based on the dream of a king who was not Muslim. No one should seek the headaches of leadership, but sometimes it becomes necessary if it'll protect the people. And Allah knows best.

[@yeager9731]

What kind of logic are you using? Islam before prophet Muhammad was not the one we have in it's entirety as in all rules and regulations etc and even if so you are comparing a prophet of Allah to general normal Muslims in 2024...

[@abdullahadepoju896]

Al Imam Qurtubi gave the same explanation that Bro Abdulqadir gave​@@yeager9731

[@gaza1677]

You have explained it very nicely

[@gaza1677]

​@@yeager9731everything in the Qur'an is applicable to us whether it's today or tomorrow Unless you want to tell us the examples in the Qur'an

[@malikbyn5353]

What is the Quran saying when Yusuf as meets the king? „فلما كلمه" What is the first message a Prophet is delivering when meeting people, especially people of high ranks? Tawhid. And then the king find Yusuf as trustworthy and gives him a position in full independency. So your example of the story is not applicable And Allah knows best

[@Zi.1111]

I really needed this talk. I promised myself I would never vote Labour(who is Muslim) but the conservatives in my area are too strong(he is evil) and there was no alternative or independent. I feel sick to my stomach with this vote

[@imanz4718]

The workers party candidates are also usually Muslim! They're pro ceasefire and against teaching LGBT in school

[@JC-pw4gh]

I would not vote for Labour or Conservatives, if no other viable independent prob best not to vote. Allah knows best

[@Towardsthatwhichgivesyoulife]

Don't vote, don't endorse anyone who is slaughtering our brothers and sisters

[@nomadbiker4040]

Dont vote, it is participating in their corrupt system voting for any of those criminals.

[@sami123yz]

Do not vote in democracy

[@Positive-Princess]

Assalaamu 'Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuh. I’m listening from Seattle 🇺🇸. I haven’t voted 🗳️ since I was in university. Why would I vote for a non believer?

[@mhmd_old7]

No, both biden and trump are zanadiqah kuffar tawagheet that you should stay away from voting to.

[@abdul.ghani.5989]

Stay Muslim, don't vote, these idiots have sold their eeman, that's it

[@thomassimpelton]

There are 3 options not 2 options. Not Voting is an option.

[@Kannotwait]

6:50 Astaghfirullah

[@mohammadafkhami]

If you live in a democracy then get involved in Industry, Politics and Academia. Who are these people 😂

[@anonymous-ll4bw]

voting in a democracy system is haram. MPs go to a parliament, a parliament votes on haram matters and legislates rules which go against Shariah rules. Thus voting, partaking as a member of parliament its self, is all haram. Islam has its own political system, government and ruling system. Our obligation is to reinstate an islamic state ruled by and only islamic Shariah.

[@knightdave1986]

Pls don't confuse with democracy and Secularism.. Secularism is kufr..

[@IsmailRosli]

What is Islam's political system? I'm genuinely curious. How do we define it?

[@Allblaster]

Paying taxes is haram. They spend money on killing Palestinians by funding Israel. Stay unemployed forever or flee the country 🤣 This is your logic so be consistent please

[@_naalimit]

He just explained everything. Our people are terrible.

[@IsmailRosli]

@@_naalimit i think you fail to understand what i mean. Reinstate an Islamic state is the end. With laws based on the Shariah. But in what manner do you propose? Autocracy? A ruler with absolute power. An elective "monarchy"? With a council of select individuals who have influence to decide who will be the next ruler. I'm asking about mechanisms and means to attain and maintain leadership in the Ummah.

[@JC-pw4gh]

I stopped voting since Iraq invasion but this year inshaAllah I will vote for our muslim independent here in Blackburn Lancashire

[@sami123yz]

Dont

[@Neretva-w9o]

100% Disagree. Whether he is a lesser evil or he promiss to help or make it easy for the muslim community at the end he still has to pledge the legion to the Thagoot government and swear on their book of man made laws. And after that he will have to respect countless of harams made in to halals and not be able to stand up against them. That will make him a mushrik. BTW this so called Shaikh lost me while in Saudi Arabia, when he stopped Sneako talking or asking about Saudi tourist destination that are prohibited in islam to visit. Than i knew there is something sketchy about this so called shaikh. Bye

[@millatiibrahim2416]

Do not vote. Shaykh Al Albaani said the principle of lesser of two evils in legislative elections is falsehood, because kufr is one religion and the legislative process is part of their kufr, so voting in their process is like taking the disbelievers as allies in actions. Albaanis words not mine.

[@yaseenpirzadah2767]

Al-Albani is a great scholar. however, his fatwa is not an evidence. It seems that Abu Taymiyyah is giving strong evidence from the other camp of scholars who gave a different fatwa.

[@Learn-More.]

Assalamu Alaikom Akh The Brother already mentions the "Fatwa changes because of the Time & Place", u need to listen to the Video at 3:16. and Allah knows best

[@Muqtadir171]

@@yaseenpirzadah2767did you not watch the video ? Wallahi you people only listen to what you want to hear

[@squidguard1]

@@yaseenpirzadah2767The salafi brothers blindly follow the same group of scholars on everything. They simply do not consider opinions from scholars outside of that circle

[@millatiibrahim2416]

Albaani didn't give credence to the principles that Abu Taymiyyah or the other ulema cited, because he sees this as an issue of Tawheed and Imaan and rightly so, because he understood the elements of Kufr involved. Albaani discredited any view of the lesser of two evils or benefits and harms in the issue of legislative elections because it is directly connected to the disbelief of the disbelievers.. which doesn't compromise based on circumstances until the kufr itself is removed from the process which it isn't. Those Ulema are mistaken or were talking about a circumstance where Kufr isn't part of the innate structure of the election.

[@brothersman524]

I voted for Reform!! - ehem just kidding. Didn't vote at all, I was on holiday in a couple of Muslim countries

[@HumphreyPoufong]

You’re free not to vote because of your religious beliefs!!

[@sadofaraji5999]

These Sheikhs they dont talk these about kings but when it come for umma to elect the lesser the evil they came with this non sense

[@nomadbiker4040]

They do talk about the kings and even advise them.

[@AdaGyuik56]

May Allah bless you for speaking haqq, I know it’s not easy so may Allah increase you

[@ismailjaff]

What haq he still didnt say it is haram or haram or haram

[@AsmaSaidah]

Why would it be haram? What type of question is this honestly

[@murtazaakhi1848]

It is worse than haraam. Legislation is for Allah alone

[@Kaijiii7]

Did you even bother watching the video, or..?

[@AsmaSaidah]

@@murtazaakhi1848 so the hadeeth about following the law of whatever land you’re in is about what then?

[@AsmaSaidah]

@@Kaijiii7 no

[@Tabbasam786-l7r]

@@AsmaSaidah this refers to a being under a muslim ruler in a muslim land. in another narration we are told to obey the ruler as long as their is no disobediance to Allah azawajal.

[@Mixedblood82]

Many of the Muslim in governance have adopted an Islamic laws in their practise in order to achieve status. Yet the imams are silent on these candidates so we see inconsistency in their behaviour just as they are silent on the action of the rulers today

[@Waleedibnirshad]

Who’s here for the premiere 👍🏻

[@AANaeem]

a nice balanced approach. i personally wont be voting nonetheless

[@mikhan5191]

By not voting - you support the status quo without realising it.

[@AANaeem]

@@mikhan5191 which status quo??

[@pavlebek2355]

@@mikhan5191what 😂😂

[@mikhan5191]

@@AANaeem - the current existing political rule in whichever country you reside in. If it is a bad/evil system then, by not voting, you made the CHOICE of not helping to remove that evil.

[@AANaeem]

@@mikhan5191 ok

[@ilhamSaleh]

why not just "If you can avoid voting, avoid otherwise vote for less evil one"? I think people in the UK have the right to not vote

[@AM-bm9rs]

Either way you are paying your taxes to mushriks to implement mushriks laws

[@techbetold]

to not vote now is to remain silent in the face of atrocities.

[@icetruth]

😳

[@dar-al-hijratayn]

This statement is void of any reality. Atrocities have been occurring for many years and the muslim community has been voting for all those years.

[@Anon_unknown999]

the americans said this before Biden came in to presidency, would you say blood is also on the hands of those voters ?

[@user-yf7dk6le7z]

To save your faith and religion!

[@Anon_unknown999]

@@user-yf7dk6le7z i think my reply got deleted, I wouldnt vote at all as the voting system isnt islamic at all. Simple as

[@user-ih6oe9ny3j]

This is like me telling the teacher on the day of the exam, only Allah can test me😂 If we Muslims don't participate in our political system, then laws will be written with zero muslim input and enforced with zero muslim input. Only in a democratic country can a Muslim question their ruler, try that in UAE or Saudi Arabia and see where that gets you. Democracy is a beautiful thing.

[@Ms72372]

Kufr statement audoubillah democracy will never be beautiful to us

[@user-ih6oe9ny3j]

​@@Ms72372 I hear Afghanistan and Iran are lovely places to live, I hope you're not living in the filthy west. I live in a country where I as a Muslim can even critic the prime minister on the street to his face without fear of persecution. I live in a country where I can choose to be a practicing Muslim, or a non-practicing Muslim, and no one would care or judge me for it. Alhamdulilah I'm grateful for the UK, and for democracy

[@Ms72372]

1) Iran is not a muslim country , 2) kufr statements democracy will never be us your white washed, if your happy with their system then become them because it isn't for us Muslims. 3) speaking against rulers/ rebelling is against the hadiths and what the salaf did. In sha Allah learn the fundamentals of tawheed. 4) You comment about me living in the west like I wasn't born here but in sha allah I get to move away from the west which has brainwashed u guys.

[@Ms72372]

@@user-ih6oe9ny3j 1) Iran is run by kuffar. 2) The fact you think like that shows the type of person you are, whitewashed. Saying alhamdullilah to democracy is opposing what Allah has affirmed in the Quran. 3) Does speak out against the ruler make you feel macho? 4) In sha Allah I get away from this country that will never love us as we will never love them. And it shows how easily influenced and ready to let go of your culture and religion for western values lol.

[@Velidmujic111]

Murjiah call to obedience to taghut.

[@Mohammed5i]

How do we reconcile the two principles of mafasada/maslaha with ad-daruurah? Wouldnt ad daruurah negate anyone taking part in voting and democracy at all because in most cases muslims are not threatened by life / death situation to allow them commit a sin. Or do the scholars so both principles here?

[@nadirajames4267]

Alhamdulillah from the USA

[@Adil1amin]

Okay I'm with him, voting is Shirk because it associates partners with Allah, but if a Muslim represents you it's no longer shirk 😂. If the better, is a candidate with a Muslim name, shirk is absolutely fine. The shariah legislates shirk due to need. Salafis listen to this and think this type of reasoning follows.

[@cabdiraxmaan3754]

His argument has no base in sharia, there is no masalaha in shirk because there is no greater evil than shirk

[@bismillahschool]

I know Lecturing about Halal and Haram all day long- don't drink it's Haram, don't do drugs, don't do Zinah etc - but we changing Legislation and we are changing everything Halal to Haram and Vice-versa.... it's not like Lobbying anyways;

[@Adil1amin]

@@certes7920 😂 you shouldn't be reassured I'm not with you, not in the slightest. I'm mocking the salafi methodology it leads to huge absurdities. To use the verse of the quran, on the face of it, is exactly how it the khawarij accused sayiduna Ali alayhi Salaam. Abu Taymiyyah and salafis have to try reconcile between their methodological ancestors the khawarij and then try to appear to be from the people Sunnah, I.e. Use the reasoning employed by the schools, e.g. That urf has an impact on rulings, etc. It leads to disgusting statements like his, that the shariah will allow shirk in certain circumstances. Absolute filth. Only the indoctrinated can listen to this blasphemy and think it's okay.

[@cabdiraxmaan3754]

@@Adil1aminif you mocking salafi methodology = u r mocking Islam bacause salaf means the 1st three generations including the prophet mohamed salalhu aleyhi wasalam and sahaba. There are many people like the madakhila who claim to be salafi but far away from salaf methodology because you will not find 1 single statement from the scholars of salaf ( the fist 3 genetations) which says sharia can permit shirk in any way or shape. By the way this fatwa of promoting shirk is not exclusive to pseudo-salafis ( madakhila..) but also Ikhwanis ( muslim brotherhood) started it, they are the first group to promote voting and taking part in the parlimants. Sufis( asha'ira) promote this shirk as well, their scholars have no problem with this type of voting. You will find many salafi scholars who reject this type of shirk but it almost impossible to find a an akhwani or sufi scholars who deosn't promot this shirk.

[@dhdowlad]

May people here want to live in the west and not vote.. You can leave the country if you don't want to vote. There are many ways we are contributing to the powerment of the government we refused to vote for...

[@varinderpalsharma4420]

The prophet didn’t vote. He never accepted the system. Would you tell him to leave

[@hahdgdgherfhx]

Not every vote is shirk

[@abdulkabeeradebayo2556]

So, in my country, no matter how muslim you are, the moment you make any attempt to change anything to favour Islam then you are in big trouble, you just have bow to the demokufru system 😢... Their is no way I'm voting anyone especially a muslim into the system... May Allaah strengthen Islam and the Muslimeen. From Nigeria

[@ibnAmat]

“Someone who rules by rulings other than Allah’s is a kafir” “Your khawarji if you call Muslims rulers Kuffar” How does this make sense?

[@nomadbiker4040]

Boy Jeylani you have changed a lot. That's what happens when you return to the lands of kufr and mix with ahl al bidah. May Allaah guide you

[@alioda1369]

We do have the 3rd option, which is the correct option, to seek and prepare the grounds for the governor who Allah appointed on this earth, who will uphold the government of Allah. THE MAHDI (AS)

[@techbetold]

but until he arrives we must exercise our right and vote for a pro islamic party like the workers party. otherwise we will be lost and complicit with our silence.

[@subwaysurfer3008]

the amount of ppl who dont know what shirk even means , what constitutes shirk, n what constitutes kufr is crazy

[@humanaccount2754]

جزاكم الله خيرا

[@raihanahmed8851]

London - I advise everyone to vote for Niko Omilana

[@StarLight-no6ic]

Not niko😂

[@mujahidAlb_1]

naudhubillah

[@muhammadsalafiahlulhadith]

*FROM THE 10 NULLIFIERS OF ISLAM: NULLIFIERS NUMBER 4️⃣&8️⃣ BOTH HAVE MINOR AS WELL AS MAJOR KUFR CATEGORIES & MUST ALWAYS BE INVESTIGATED BY THE SALAFI ULAMA☝🏻😎🇸🇦🕋🕌DEBUNKING KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda ikhwanul mufliseen fanboys & fangirls:🤚🏻STOP MISQUOTING THE SAHIH HADITH TO FULFIL YOUR IKHWANI KHARIJI TAKFEERI AGENDA OF CRITICIZING RULERS🔥THE HADITH SAYS SPEAKING A WORD OF TRUTH IN FRONT OF THE RULER (MEANING IN HIS OWN PERSONAL CHAMBER ACCORDING TO VARIOUS OTHER SAHIH HADITHS)🔥NOT CRITICIZING RULERS ON PULPITS OR OTHER PUBLIC PLATFORMS SUCH AS TV, social media etc.🔥ALSO EDUCATE YOURSELF🔥EVEN A SINFUL MUSLIM CAN BE A TAGHOOT🔥NOT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE KUFFAR🔥ALL KUFFAR ARE TAWAGHEET BUT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE NOT NECESSARILY KUFFAR🔥JUST LIKE EVERY TYPE OF SHIRK (MAJOR OR MINOR) IS HARAM BUT EVERY TYPE OF HARAM IS NOT NECESSARILY SHIRK🔥THE 5 HEADS OF TAGHOOT ALSO INCLUDE THE 1 WHO TAKES BRIBES🔥AN INNOVATOR🔥SO ACCORDING TO YOU EVERY INNOVATOR WILL BE A DISBELIEVER⁉️EVERY BRIBER WILL BE A DISBELIEVER U JAAHIL⁉️EDUCATE YOURSELF* *ITS FARD COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM TO HATE SHIRK & KUFR & ALSO HATE THE MUSHRIKEEN & KUFFAR BCUZ OF THEIR SHIRK & KUFR🔥🔥WHOEVER LACKS THE ABOVE✋🏻DOES NOT HAVE AL WALA WAL BARA i.e. ALLEGIANCE & DISAVOWAL (LOVE & HATRED) FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH☝🏻😎🤲🏻🇸🇦🕋✅ALLYING WITH THE KUFFAR IS KUFR ASGHAR (minor kufr) BUT CAN ALSO BE KUFR AKBAR (MAJOR KUFR WITH CONDITION OF THE HEART THAT IS UNKNOWN & MUST BE INQUIRED)🔥ON THE OTHER HAND PEACE TREATIES WITH KUFFAR IS PERFECTLY HALAL BCUZ PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ HAD PEACE TREATIES WITH THE KUFFAR🔥PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ EVEN SAID WE WILL TAKE HELP OF THE KUFFAR IN JIHAD AGAINST A COMMON ENEMY🔥SUBHANALLAH☝🏻WHAT WILL isis alqaeda nusra bokoharam etc🔥TAKFEERIS GIVE THE FATWA ON MUHAMMADﷺ NOW⁉️Yes 1 of the treaties were broken unilaterally by THE MUSHRIKS of Makkah🔥SO SURAH TAWBAH WAS REVEALED☝🏻Even if it was broken🔥It does NOT make peace treaties KUFR OR HARAM🔥✋🏻SAUDI ARABIA BANS ISRAEL TRADE BUT HAS PEACE TREATIES WITH USA & TRADES WITH USA🔥NOTHING HARAM IN TRADING PRODUCTS WITH NONMUSLIM COUNTRIES🔥EVEN IF THEY TRADE WEAPONS✅NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT✅THE KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda nusra etc🔥PUT TAKFEER ON SAUDI GOVERNMENT FOR TRADING WEAPONS WITH USA🔥BUT PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ LITERALLY SAID:U WILL FIGHT ALONGSIDE KUFFAR AGAINST A COMMON KAAFIR ENEMY IN JIHAD✅SO THAT HADITH REFUTES THE KHAWARIJ TAKFEERIS✅ALSO WEAPONRY ARE 1 OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ASSETS OF ANY NATION✅FOR ITS ARMY & DEFENSE✅IF U DONT HAVE HEAVY POWERFUL WEAPONS🔥HOW CAN U DEFEND YOUR COUNTRY AGAINST UNEXPECTED AMBUSHES & TERRORIST ATTACKS⁉️SO ALHUMDULILLAH ISLAM IS PERFECT✅Treachery or treason are all punishable by death under Islamic court of Law & also USA🔥& 1 of the main forms of treachery is Ridda🔥Apostasy🔥AMERICAN SUGARCOATERS WEST INFATUATED LIBERALIZED JAAHIL MUSLIMS KEEP SAYING:"DEATH PENALTY IS ONLY IF AN APOSTATE COMMITS TREASON AGAINST GOVERNMENT BLAH BLAH"🔥BUT WE HAVE NUMEROUS NARRATIONS THAT APOSTASY IS PUNISHED BY DEATH IN ISLAM✅THESE LIBERALS ARE ON THE VERGE OF KUFR DANGLING ON THE FENCE WALLAH REJECTING AUTHENTIC NARRATIONS OF RASOOLULLAHﷺ✅ALSO APOSTASY ITSELF IS THE BIGGEST FORM OF TREASON🔥If treason against a human probably temporary government is punishable by death penalty🔥THEN WHAT ABOUT TREASON AGAINST ALLAH THE KING OF ALL KINGS⁉️THE CREATOR OF THE WHOLE UNIVERSE ⁉️THAT'S THE BIGGEST TREASON SUBHANALLAH✅SO APOSTASY IS FAR MORE LEGIBLE FOR DEATH PENALTY THAN TREASON AGAINST A GOVERNMENT OR MAN MADE CONSITUTIONS LIKE USA EUROPE ETC🔥May Allah guide these JAAHIL liberals SUGARCOATERS of Islam AMEEN* 6️⃣ *MAJOR KUFR1️⃣ISTIHLAAL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT 1 OR MORE HARAM/PROHIBITIONS IN ISLAM IS HALAL SUCH AS ALCOHOL GAMBLING DRUGS PORK ZINA MURDER STEALING ETC2️⃣JUHOOD⛔CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BUT NOT IN HIS HEART (Like Firaun/Pharaoh VERBALLY REJECTED MUSA ALAIHISALAM BUT believed in his heart THAT Musa ALAIHISALAM was upon the Haq/Truth)3️⃣TAKZEEB⛔️CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH VERBALLY AS WELL AS IN HIS HEART i.e. BOTH EXTERNALLY AS WELL AS INTERNALLY4️⃣TAFDEEL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR TO ALLAH'S LAWS5️⃣MUSAWAAT⛔️BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS & ALLAH'S LAWS ARE EQUAL6️⃣TABDEEL⛔RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS & CLEARLY & VERBALLY ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH🔥🔥🔥3️⃣MINOR KUFR7️⃣Istibdaal🚯RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS WITHOUT ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH8️⃣Taqneen🚯COMING UP WITH A NEW LAW9️⃣Tashree' 'Aam🚯GENERAL MAN MADE LEGISLATION & ENFORCEMENT ON PUBLIC* *THE JUDGEMENT OF ALLAH COVERS EVERYONE, NOT JUST THE MUSLIM RULERS✅MAY ALLAH GUIDE & PROTECT ALL MUSLIM RULERS AMEEN✅EVERY MUSLIM IS A SINNER & HE/SHE JUDGES BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS THROUGH HIS SINS EVERY DAY JUST LIKE ANY RULER OR HUMAN BEING BCUZ NOBODY IS PERFECT LIKE ANGELS✅WHENEVER WE SIN🔥WE JUDGE BY OUR NAFS/EGO &/OR SHAYTAAN'S WHISPERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY NOT ALLAH'S JUDGEMENT✅🔥THAT IS 100% JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH & ITS NOT KUFR AKBAR TO JUDGE BY OTHER THAN ALLAH UNLESS IT CLEARLY AND VERBALLY FALLS UNDER THE 6 CATEGORIES OF MAJOR KUFR:1️⃣ISTIHLAAL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING THE HARAM MAN MADE LAWS ARE HALAL)2️⃣TABDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY ATTRIBUTING MAN MADE LAWS TO ALLAH & JUDGING BY THEM)3️⃣TAFDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR OR BETTER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS)4️⃣MUSAWAAT (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE EQUAL TO ALLAH'S LAWS)5️⃣JUHOOD (CLEARLY JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS EXTERNALLY WITH CLEAR PROVEN ARROGANCE IN HEART & ACTIONS AGAINST ALLAH LIKE FIRAUN WHO BELIEVED THAT MUSA ALAIHISALAM'S LAW OF TORAH WAS RIGHT BUT ARROGANTLY REJECTED & OPPOSED IT WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS) & FINALLY6️⃣TAKZEEB (CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH INTERNALLY IN HIS HEART AS WELL AS EXTERNALLY WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS)* *THIS IS WHAT THE SALAFI KIBAARUL ULAMA ALSO MENTIONED SO U SHOULD FEAR ALLAH & STOP SUPER IMPOSING YOUR DEFINITIONS ON THE CLEAR CUT IJMA OF THE SALAFUSSALIHEEN & ALL THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE RIGHTEOUS SALAFI AQEEDAH & MANHAJ*

[@asmil5324]

Crazy muslim please engarage to vote this election other wish all myslim retrun owen country

[@Jhonny2Ww]

Search for الرد على محمد بن شمس الدين في إباحته الشرك لأخفف الضررين - عبدالمهيمن إبراهيم

[@mumina_gaziza_85]

Allahumma barik lahu

[@bismillahschool]

Lecturing about Halal and Haram all day long- don't drink it's Haram, don't do drugs, don't do Zinah etc - but we changing Legislation and we are changing everything Halal to Haram and Vice-versa.... it's not like Lobbying anyways;

[@EE-ub2oe]

What is the final answer?

[@user-it7dl7hq5k]

its kufr

[@definitelynotanentirecolon1026]

The opinion given in this video is that in general it is kufr, but there are circumstances wherein if a candidate is endorsing the affairs of muslims, or is a lesser evil of a group of greater evils, it can be permissible.

[@IshaqAamosAwrahamCoptic]

@@definitelynotanentirecolon1026 So non Muslim must bend to Muslims in non Muslims countries?

[@saberdjaghboub7077]

@@IshaqAamosAwrahamCoptic they do no have to do anything, they are infidels

[@shamali9941]

Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatu if you cant pra your religion you should try make hijrah if you have the means. Allaah is sufficient for the believer's Al Hamdu Lillaah. Voting still feels doubtful. Wallahu alum. Those who vote that's up to them. Those who dont thats up to him. Just the politician's are kniwn liars and i dont see any of them truthful.

[@techbetold]

george galloways workers party is pro islam.

[@jyggalag_]

Alhamdulillah ala kulli haal, from India

[@wstar2]

JazakAllah Kayrun - I can see from the comments how closed minded and fixed people are - and lacking in knowledge are - sometimes brothers and sisters take the time to contemplate, move away from tiktok 30 second answers and try and listen

[@anonym-ks6hr]

You're mistaken here. You are the one who takes knowledge from TikTok or Instagram. Your misguided Shaykh, who justifies shirk, knows nothing. And just like the names he mentioned at the beginning, you neither take from the praised generations nor are they a necessary support for you. You and your shuyukh love the spotlight; you live for recognition among people, and you can't live without it. So, don't talk nonsense here. The people of the Sunnah do not have such a character. They are not publicly visible like that, and they don't need to show off. You recognize them by the fact that they only quote from the praised generations. They only mention known and chosen names; that's how you recognize them. They don't offer their own explanations; they relay the explanations that were already given many years ago by the praised Imams. These are the characteristics of the people of Sunnah. So think and repent, for truly, you and your community are in error. You are upon shirk, and I disassociate myself from you, the mushrikeen.

[@techbetold]

Abu Sa’id al-Khudri reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace & blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever among you sees evil, let him change it with his hand. If he cannot do so, then with his tongue. If he cannot do so, then with his heart, which is the weakest level of faith.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 49 to not vote now, is to remain silent in the face of a genocide. to not vote now would be a silent approval of the atrocities being committed.

[@AbuBakr-Siddiq]

Anyone who votes has committed Kuffr. Allah is the only legislator not some white man from the UK. Only a jahil would vote. And do you really think by voting the genocide will stop?

[@MukadisAymen-ui8fy]

May the almighty Allah bless my brother Abu taymiyyah for talking about this it's just unfortunately today Muslims country's ar in the UN some are in NATO an we as Muslims know for sure what this organizations are doing especially against Muslims may the almighty Allah guide as all as Muslims............😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 🤲🏼🤲🏼🤲🏼🤲🏼🤲🏼

[@hakimvlogs6579]

Wait.. the same people that say the verse regarding whoever is ruling other than the law of Allah is a kafir, is hukm aam (general) therefore you can’t rebel against the ruler They can’t now use this verse to say voting is haram and it’s kufr bcos it’s other than the rule of Allah

[@nomadbiker4040]

Thats not the only proof against rebelling against a muslim ruler. And it was none other than the sahabah who mentioned the aayah referring to the different levels of kufr. Voting is from democracy, which is giving majority the rulership instead of Allaah Almighty, which is shirk and kufr akbar

[@aliaude4031]

We need to vote. In europe we got so many right parties getting alot of votes. please vote parties against them

[@Mixedblood82]

Lastly, to The honourable respected Sheikh that I do Love and admire, our imams need to have the vision and foresight of how the disbelievers game strategy is and if we look at it from a different angle like a game of chess, we need to see the dangers and effects and their aims in why they are pushing Muslims to vote. And if we can see this which only a few scholars do, you will understand that taking part in democracy is the greater of two evils. May Allah bless you

[@chillout914]

These people live in an alternative world i swear .....

[@Amember391]

Even if you use your common sense, why would anyone want to vote for liars

[@DutchComedian]

Why did your families come to Europe if you hate their laws and culture? Don't be hypocrites.

[@nomadbiker4040]

They should try to leave for sure. Even the ones who converted to Islam, if they are able to.

[@hsvr]

a TikTok scholar told me its haram to vote

[@aatifrehman4150]

Yet migrate and reap the benefits of the system and whn it comes to duty and responsibility,sneak out?

[@techbetold]

Abu Sa’id al-Khudri reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever among you sees evil, let him change it with his hand. If he cannot do so, then with his tongue. If he cannot do so, then with his heart, which is the weakest level of faith.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 49 so vote for a pro palestinian party like the workers. nuff said.

[@hsvr]

@@techbetold what’s voting for the pro Palestinian party going to achieve

[@techbetold]

@@hsvr ceasefire. if not, then suspension of support and donations and possible war against isnotreal.

[@techbetold]

@@hsvr ceasefire. if not….then stopping the weapons & money support.

[@Fasalzahoorahanger]

Kashmir

[@Mohammed5i]

Wouldnt voting in kufr systems come under ad daruurah? Instead of mafsada and maslaha?

[@KarlWellhung]

You shouldn't even be able to vote

[@robertpineda2858]

Exactly. These clowns need to understand that voting is a privilege. If you wanna waste that privilege, then just go back to your Islamic dictatorships.

[@rasmus4236]

The real option : Dastur al-Madina!

[@mstar9248]

Just go out and vote man 😅