"Is Your Mind Trained for Happiness?" by Tal Tsfany

[@AleksandarIvanov69]

That sculpture screams "Live! Thrive! Achieve!" and that is THE most beautiful part of Objectivism - the reminder of what we can be!

[@juanlopez1250]

Thanks for the video. You’re a gentleman in every respect.

[@ANascente]

The name of the psychology book is "A Guide To Understanding Your Emotions", from Edith Packer.

[@marybachmann]

Good presentation. I agree that happiness is a habit best developed early. I was fortunate to be surrounded by people who valued life and believed that happiness and success were the products of virtuous behavior. It is best if parents and school both immerse a child in opportunities to foster rationality, productiveness and pride.

[@CatsForCapitalism]

Could you add those links and references to the video description, please.

[@danielborges.]

Here some: courses.aynrand.org/campus-courses/psycho-epistemology-i/ and www.amazon.com/Lectures-Psychology-Guide-Understanding-Emotions-ebook/dp/B00ENAPR3S

[@NowisEvollovetion]

One can only be happy 'NOW'. And yes, the more you go out of the 'NOW'. Into either the 'PAST' or the 'FUTURE' (into your 'imagination' in other words). The 'MORE UNHAPPY' you will become. Guru The Golfer.

[@StannYo]

Great video ! Do you know what is said when the sound is muted at 40:30 ?

[@danielborges.]

The sculpture is really spectacular.

[@user-gy1ky9qe7w]

4:17 what do you want? How are you going to achieve it ? 6:30 m,e,s

[@NowisEvollovetion]

A man with a mind that is 'STILL' is a 'HAPPY' man. Whilst a man with a mind that is constantly in 'MOTION/THINKING' is a man who has a 'MULTITUDE OF TROUBLE'S'. Guru The Golfer.

[@NowisEvollovetion]

By far the 'SIMPLEST' way to be 'HAPPY'. Is to give up being 'UNHAPPY'. Guru The Golfer.

[@waneagony]

Unfortunately the production quality and delivery of ARI videos is awful. This (not necessarily this particular video) cannot be the best that ARI can deliver. Why do you not put more effort into this if this is the way you have chosen to deliver content? Is this how Roark would have delivered this? Galt? Dagny? If not them, then which one of Rand's characters? None of Rand's heros if you ask me. Unfortunately I am certain that you, the ppl at ARI, will evade answering this, and evade asking yourselves these questions enough to act on them.

[@NowisEvollovetion]

Thinking is 'NOT' in fact intelligent. 'NOT THINKING IS'. As yes, the 'PROBLEMS' only begin when the 'THINKING STARTS'. Guru The Golfer.

[@NowisEvollovetion]

@Time Warp No. It is what 'I KNOW' from my own hard earned experience.

[@NowisEvollovetion]

@Time Warp No. I simply 'looked' at the situation, and I saw the sad reality of it. No thought of any sort was required.

[@NowisEvollovetion]

@Time Warp So, in your infinite wisdom. You are attempting to tell me that when I look at something, that I cannot see anything. When I 'know' from my own hard earned experience that I can. My God, you are a fool aren't you?

[@NowisEvollovetion]

@Time Warp Look! Have you ever seen the word 'awareness'. It means to be looking without thinking. And yes, those who are aware of what is going on around them 'very rarely' have any accidents of any sort. Unlike most of the 'zombies' in this world of habitual thinkers. Those who walk around in a perpetual dream state. Constantly banging into things and falling over. Talk about POND LIFE!

[@NowisEvollovetion]

@Time Warp No you don't! I 'instinctively know' what I am seeing. You see, you mentioned the word 'recognise' in one of your above comments. But, what you have clearly not yet realised. Is that one can in fact only re-cognise something that one has previously cognised/realised. In other words, when I look at something I can see the reality (the truth) of it. As deep down inside of me, underneath all of the utter crap that we all tend to gather inside of us. I already 'know' the facts associated with what I am seeing. I have just become 'disconnected' from that truth during the process of growing up in this crazy world.