Islam is the Truth

Assalamu alaykum. In this video i go over Some historical proofs of Islam, as well as going over some counter arguments for these proofs. I talk about proof that the prophet ﷺ was illiterate, Proof that there weren't many jews or Christians in Arabia at the time, especially where the prophet ﷺ lived, Some intertextual relationships between the Quran and other biblical texts, and times that the Quran corrected the bible and Torah.
If you would like to support me and gain access to special perks:
/ janrycz
My Instagram, twitter and tiktok:
/ janrycz
/ janrycz
/ janrycz
Research and script in the doc below:
docs.google.co...
Sources below:
Proving Islam Channel - / @provingislam
Intertextuality Series - • New InterTextuality Se...
Sheikh Bin Uthaymeen's opinion on the goofy "miracle":
• 28- هل الخطوط في كف ال...
Proof that the Arabs were violent -
shamela.ws/boo...
www.islamweb.n...
Britannica Literacy -
www.britannica...
Papers about ancient literacy -
books.google.s...
www.academia.e...
www.academia.e...
www.academia.e...
There was no Arabic bible -
www.academia.e...
• Intertextuality Ep 3: ...
Meccan/Medinan verses -
www.islamic-aw...
Rabbi converts to Islam -
• Rabbi Tests the Prophe...
Free Qurans -
freequrans.co.uk/
The Qur'an and the Secrets of Egypt By ‪@ManyProphetsOneMessage‬ -
• The Qur'an and the Sec...
Quran website: quran.com
Hadith website: sunnah.com
Bible website: www.biblegatew...
Torah/Talmud Website: www.sefaria.org

[@Bluecat0]

I'm born Muslim , then ex Muslim , then revert back to Islam ❤

[@AdamOsamahHammad19]

That sign is not islam

[@Safetyman64]

​@@AdamOsamahHammad19 Why isnt it a Sign of Islam.

[@idkidc7560]

​@@Safetyman64Because it was used by pagans, rather use these signs ❤️🏳️🏳️

[@Bob-un4tf]

Convert*

[@UzbekExMuslim]

Kazzab! You were never a true Ex-Muslim. If you were, you would never revert back to Islam!

[@simonrocky7223]

Thank you for putting "go pray if you haven't" cuz this video came right before I started praying

[@mortarman83095]

@@simonrocky7223 same, every video should have this reminder

[@haq248]

I had already prayed but when I saw that I read some of the Qur’an. Also, in 0:22, I think you forgot that ‘sent down’ could be interpreted as being sent down from space, which it is.

[@mylordtakemeaway]

especially if you have food to eat for the day then pray or else that is utterly ungrateful

[@CampingComrade.]

What sort of Angel hides in a cave? this simply debunks Islies

[@yes4476]

man, I knew about Jews in Madina, but didn't know there were literally no Ahl al-Kitab in Makka, Jazakallahu khairan for increasing my knowledge.

[@JanRyczkowski]

There was a christian servant, And maybe very few people of ahlul kitab, but nobody knowledable and no communities

[@shahmirmir2281]

@@JanRyczkowski there was also Waraqah Bin Naufal, a Christian cousin of the Prophet's wife Khadija, who told the Prophet after the incident in cave Hira that he met angel Jibrael [AS]. He was a scholar and knew well about the Torah and Gospel.

[@BlazySM-qp4yn]

​@@shahmirmir2281 He died shortly after the first revelation.

[@shahmirmir2281]

@@BlazySM-qp4yn yes I know I was just telling him.

[@ref.9278]

@@shahmirmir2281 waraqah not from mecca

[@Ykshirpalayan]

I used to be agnostic. But then I saw the truth of Islam and became a Muslim. Alhamdulillah, insha'Allah, I am thinking of starting to pray. (I've been thinking about it for a long time, but I couldn't put it into action...)

[@JanRyczkowski]

Assalamu alaykum. Mashallah brother may you have sucess in your life and in being a muslim. Please email me at [e-mail] And i can invite you to my discord server for free. Me and the brothers can teach you the next steps in becoming a good muslim inshallah

[@xroyaleh3793]

I hope insha'Allah you will succeed ❤

[@heroweeb6938]

@@xroyaleh3793 amine❤️

[@CampingComrade.]

What angel would hide in a cave? seems like a Jinn pretending to be an angel.

[@Ykshirpalayan]

@@CampingComrade. I don't understand what you're saying? If you're talking about Gabriel, who said he was hiding in the cave? If I remember correctly, Gabriel came there while the prophet was going to the cave and praying to God. There was no hiding.

[@aasimshaikh3083]

I was reading Surah Yusuf a few days ago and i asked my teacher why the ruler of Egypt was called "Malik" instead of "Firaun". Your video answered that greatly.

[@hit_or_miss8553]

Mashallah youre relatively young but yet so ambitious, you have my respect man

[@BYardleyOfficial]

Say Allahuma Barik

[@lea.333]

glad to see you uploading again! diving in now

[@SyedAhmedJaved]

0:29 These types of "proofs" should never even be used in an argument because they just make fun of Islam.

[@thedarkkuro7474]

yea plus those arent even arabic numbers hhh

[@haq248]

Aren’t they Arabic numbers?

[@SyedAhmedJaved]

@@haq248 Arabic numbers did not exist when the Noble Qurʾān was revealed. The Arabic Abjad was used to write numerals in the same way Roman numerals were used before the numbers. The numbers were later invented and brought from India and Persia

[@Apogee012]

@@SyedAhmedJaved persia? i thought they were directly from india to persia, the arabs didnt need to go through the sassanids, they just used the indian ocean.

[@SyedAhmedJaved]

@@Apogee012 although Arab merchants often directly travelled to the subcontinent and the Malay archipelago by maritime routes, the Persian Muslim scientists were the ones who actually popularized the use of Hindu-Arabic numerals.

[@commando1912]

Sending love and prayers from Iraq, even though I am born a Muslim I learnt a lot from you, mashallah brother. May Allah bless you and grant you Jannah.

[@JanRyczkowski]

Ameen and you too

[@_USE_YOUR_BRAIN]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Your works are amazing brother

[@JanRyczkowski]

وَعَلَيكُمْ السَّلَامُ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ

[@CloudLsth]

20 years later and he's back. Good video. No offense. It was a joke.

[@the_arabic_zombie1]

🎉pray for Palestine

[@Abdullah-kw6kk]

🤲

[@lvateinn8258]

And for syria and uyghurs and for rohingya muslims and for Sudan and for the sunnis in iraq and iran

[@CloudLsth]

brother we are all Muslims, if you follow the prophet, believe in Allah and his book, angels, prophets, ... Quran and hadith. I don't remember the prophet pbuh coming with two separate islams, but only one [brother it's the media and disbelievers trying to divide us].

[@ABIRHOSSAIN-jy3ve]

your videos have only strengthen my belief. thank you man . god bless. love from 🇧🇩

[@Cupman668]

I’m happy, and I want to thank Allah for not leaving us astray. This is so great to know where we are and what is our purpose. and for this happiness to be completed, I want that Allah save us and enter us to jannat Al firdus in peace with no previous torment or to be judged, rightly guided on a straight path, protected from the protector when we find no one but him to protect us. For me and all who read this.

[@JanRyczkowski]

Ameen

[@lelegoguemraoui772]

glad to see you upload again!

[@Ayo090]

im an agnostic and i cannot wait to go home and watch this video lol

[@Wowyouexist1234]

May you be guided. mate

[@khaledmostafa11]

same as me pal love watching these vids even though I am agnostic

[@Quran_Alone_Dawah]

Agnostic but leaning more towards God? Because you can be agnostic atheist or agnostic theist

[@rashikajhan4748]

May Allah guide u

[@kataraarts3027]

how did you find the video?

[@thedarkkuro7474]

we miss you brother thank you for strengthening our deen

[@rashikajhan4748]

This is the best video on providing Islam.... May Allah reward you for that

[@MuhammadHudhaifa]

Salam aleykum, you really a very fun person to listen to. The arguments are not only intellectually sound and thought provoking but your delivery makes it so much better. Mashallah! May Allah bless you bro in this world and the next.

[@JanRyczkowski]

Ameen same to you my brother

[@DCDawah]

Great video brother. Definitely Iman boosting

[@mznxbcv12345]

The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha" too sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

[@abdorahmanv2242]

​​@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388do you mean the word itself? Because encountering Allah is only on the day of judgment

[@mznxbcv12345]

Surah Al-Imran Aya 49, of the Quran states that jesus was sent to the israelites, although written over 1,300 years ago in the 19th century (same century bible was only transtalted into Arabic in as well) they came to the same conclusion, He never used or heard the words Christian or Christianity or any equivalent of either. Paul had neither met nor seen Jesus, his relation to the twelve apostles was one of decided independence and even of opposition. He acknowledged no subordination to them. He addressed no doctrinal epistle to them or their churches, and received none from them. He made no reports to them. He did not correspond with them regularly. They never invited him to preach to their congregations and he never invited them to address his converts. He declared that he did not owe his conversion, his baptism, or his doctrine to the twelve, and that he never spent any long time in Jerusalem or in Judea as a Christian missionary. He claimed to be an apostle by a secret divine commission, but the twelve never admitted the validity of his claim. They never gave him the title of apostle; they never said anything indicative of willingness to admit him into their councils. Vacancies occurred in their number, but they never chose him to a vacant place, rather we have statements of Peter with regards to Paul which show nothing but animosity: "And if our Jesus appeared to you also and became known in a vision and met you as angry with an enemy [recall: Paul had his vision while still persecuting the Christians: Acts 9], yet he has spoken only through visions and dreams or through external revelations. But can anyone be made competent to teach through a vision? And if your opinion is that that is possible, why then did our teacher spend a whole year with us who were awake? How can we believe you even if he has appeared to you?… But if you were visited by him for the space of an hour and were instructed by him and thereby have become an apostle, then proclaim his words, expound what he has taught, be a friend to his apostles and do not contend with me, who am his confidant; for you have in hostility withstood me, who am a firm rock, the foundation stone of the Church" -Homily 17 Section XIX On the pauline credo currently called trinitanity Peter said "For some from among the Gentiles have rejected my lawful preaching and have preferred a lawless and absurd doctrine to the man who is my enemy. And indeed some have attempted, while I am still alive, to distort my words by interpretations of many sorts, as if I taught the dissolution of the law… But that may God forbid ! For to do such a thing means to act contrary to the Law of God which was made to Moses and was confirmed by our Lord in its everlasting continuance. For he said, “The heaven and the earth will pass away, but not one jot or one tittle shall pass away from the Law.” -Letter of Peter to James, 2.3-5 Soon after Jesus had selected his twelve apostles, according to Luke, he " gave them power and authority over all devils and to cure diseases. And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick. And he said unto them: 'Take nothing for your journey, neither staves nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece. And whatsoever house ye enter, there abide and thence depart. And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them." This is the entire charge of Jesus to his apostles when he sent them out to convert the world, as reported by Luke, who claims to give the address or a portion of it, and that presumably the most important portion, word for word. The language here attributed to Jesus conveys no idea that he had any purpose of founding a new church. Neither here nor anywhere else, in the language attributed to him in the New Testament, does he explain the phrase " the kingdom of God " to mean a new ecclesiastical organization. In several passages he does use it to signify the celestial dominion after the destruction of the world; and this is therefore presumably its meaning everywhere. The gospel of Matthew is much further than that of Luke in its report of the charge of Jesus to his apostles: "These twelve Jesus sent forth and commanded them, saying: 'Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.", "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth; I am come not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother... He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet, shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward." This charge, as reported by Matthew omitted nearly all the main ideas that would have been appropriate in an address instructing the twelve to preach the foundation of Christianity. It does not say whether Jesus wished to reform or to supersede Judaism; whether his principal purpose was ecclesiastical, moral, political, or sanitary. The remarks about healing the sick and casting out devils is the most explicit of all the instructions. Certainly no reader can learn from that charge that Jesus intended to establish a new religion; and much less can he learn any feature of the faith or discipline of a projected new church. And this address is that portion of the New Testament where such information should be given most clearly. He made no doctrinal definition and no ecclesiastical organization. He did not use the key words of the original doctrines necessary to Christianity or a new church, nor the keywords of ideas afterwards associated with Christianity, such as Incarnation, Trinity, Immaculate Conception, and Transubstantiation. The subjects to which the most space or most prominence is given in the sayings attributed, in the gospels, to Jesus, are, First, the Mosaic law; Second, judgment day; Third, faith; Fourth, the sins of the Pharisees; Fifth, ascetic morality; and Sixth, his divine commission. Triune nonsense is straight out of the Roman Pantheon. Hercules, anyone? Cerberus? The trinity of Zeus, Athena Apollo, literally called the Triune. Greek goddess Hecate was portrayed in triplicate, a three-in-one. This was all done to make the creed more digestible, followed by mental gymnastics attempting to reconcile the onsensical with elaborate theories. Why doesn't a square peg fit into a round hole? Answer by saying it's a mystery instead of geometries not lining up. No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws. There never was such another epidemic of ecclesiastical forgery. The church was flooded with books attributed falsely to apostolic times and authors. The names of many of these books, and the texts of some, are preserved. Distinguished saints and learned fathers of the faith openly commended the invention and acceptance of false- hoods designed to aid the conversion of the world to what they believed to be truth. None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity. Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1 God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

[@ahlussuffiya4225]

@@mznxbcv12345 Assalamuwalaikum, can you give me some more content on Christianity

[@mznxbcv12345]

Paul invented trinitanity, as transmitted by Marcion is the inventor of trinitanity In the opening chapters of Acts we find two addresses by Peter, one delivered to the disciples when an apostle to succeed Judas Iscariot was to be chosen, and the other to the Jews on the day of Pentecost. On neither occasion did the speaker mention a new religion, or a church open to Gentiles as well as to Jews, or an abandonment of the Mosaic law. If these ideas had been in his mind at that time, he could not have omitted some reference to them. That the apostles and disciples in Jerusalem continue for at least eighteen years to comply with the requirements of the Mosaic law is proved by the epistle of Paul and also by Acts. In the latter book we read that at time not specified, probably not earlier than 40 C.E Peter went to Joppa and there ate with Gentiles-^that i he violated the Pharisaic interpretation of one of the Mosaic ceremonial rules-and after his return to Jesus; then, he was called to account by his fellow disciple He justified his conduct, not on the ground that Jesus had abrogated the ceremonial law of Moses, or any part of it, but that in a dream he had received a divine communication telling him that all manner of beasts, fowls, an creeping things were clean, and that it was lawful for him to keep company with Gentiles, who were " unclean under the law of Moses. This announcement was accepted as authoritative, but with much surprise, " becaus that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost."' This statement of the revelation to Peter, and of it acceptance by the disciples in Jerusalem, is doubtless a invention of the author of Acts. It cannot be brought into harmony with later passages of his own book, nor with the statements of Paul, who is our only trustworth; witness in these matters. According to Acts, about 51 C. E. a council was held in Jerusalem to put an end to the dissension which had arisen in the church on the questions of circumcision and unclean meats. This council decided in favor of Paul, who was in attendance and the decision as given in a letter addressed not to all Christians but only to " the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia"-where Paul had been making converts, informing them that they were not required to observe the Mosaic ceremonial law. It is quite clear that no such council would have been held if the matter had been decided ten years before, as Acts says it had been. But this account of the council of 51 C. E. is also a fiction. About eight years later Paul went to Jerusalem again, and his appearance there provoked a riot. The mob wanted to kill him because of his hostility to the Mosaic law, and this mob included Jewish Christians as well as Jews. All the Christians in Jerusalem were zealous adherents of the Mosaic law. Some of the leading brethren, presumably apostles, advised Paul to take a false oath that he did not teach his Jewish converts to neglect the law. And, if we can believe Acts, he took that oath. This, however, did not pacify the mob, which would have put him to death if the Roman soldiers had not protected him. They took him to prison and finally to Rome. This story in Acts implies that the apostolic church adopted one rule of discipline for the Gentile and another for the Jewish Christians; that the latter were, and that the former were not, required to comply with the Mosaic ceremonial law. This duplicity of discipline is not recorded elsewhere. It is not known to Paul ; and if it had existed, he could neither have been ignorant of it nor remained silent about it. He tells us that the twelve apostles in Jerusalem, or those of them known to him, favored strict adherence to Moses; and the only way in which he could get along harmoniously with them was by promising to do no missionary work in Judea. He was to labor among the Gentiles, Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself. Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted [James 1:13) God cannot be tempted (John 1:29) Jesus was seen (1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God (Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God (Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man (Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn (Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn (1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died (1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die (Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation (Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation (Mark 4:38) Jesus slept (Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep (John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful (Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful (Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing (Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing Older one is no different, Abijah was a wicked king, and had war with his rival (1. Kings 15:3). 2 Chronicles 13:3 says that Abjiah was pious ; that he took the field with 400,000 men against Jeroboam, who was at the head of 800,000 men ; and in a great battle the King of Israel was defeated, and 500,000 of his men slain. It seems that, 1,200,000 soldiers sent into the field at one time by two small tribes, and the destruction of 500,000 men in one battle, were beneath the notice of the author of Kings. How can one beieve that the One that decrees that which is a 'sin' and that which is good "die for their sins" ? He is the One who decreed it thus, can decree it not so. To whom does the One with whom final authority resides in sacrifice for? a registrar? - No. None are greater than He. Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1 God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

[@mznxbcv12345]

Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia) building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer. The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit." This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

[@shabzxd]

glad to see youre posting again brother keep up the informative vids

[@MRKAMONA]

A Great video brother and jazka Allah khyran for it but next time i hope you use the prophesies of the prophet ﷺ

[@ParrotPentester]

The wildest part about this whole video is the fact that you're more knowledgeable than most fully grown adults I know.

[@ZLG-TheGreat]

I am waiting for the "Blud is NOT cooking!" comments

[@ibroplatin4915]

Well this brother cooked very well. He's a master chef

[@MutasimBarahiyan]

May Allah protect you and increase you knowledge and understanding. Your videos are amazing. Baarakallah fyk.

[@JanRyczkowski]

Ameen and same to you

[@samiulislam4268]

MashaAllah. Want to See part two.

[@furkiking8323]

4 criteria a scripture needs to fulfill to be divinely inspired. 1. A scripture that claims to be from god 2. A scripture that is preserved since revelation 3. A scripture that has numerous miracles (scientific, time and place specific, people specific, etc.). None of the miracles have been proven to be false 4. A scripture that has 0 contradictions or mistakes This should be enough for proving the Quran's divinity as it is the only scripture that fulfills these criteria.

[@doomboi4675]

1) That is a silly arguement but whatever 2) Cant argue with that 3) Vedas also contains numerous miracles within it so would you accept that as divine ??? Also alot of the scientific miracles have been debunked 4) It literally does have mistakes tho. Zul qarnayns story is literally a copy paste of the alexandrain legends ( which are proven to be nothing more than myths ascribed to alexander the great )

[@ukimenustah26]

@@doomboi4675 thats silly how is it a copy pasted when their description aren't match like at all beside the translated named

[@ukimenustah26]

@@doomboi4675 scientific miracles have been debunked like what? Are you gonna say "the iron coming from outer space was well known in ancient egypt" or something like that? The point is that how Mohammed verify that myth to be true, did he have underground basement full of science equipment or sum that all his wives weren't aware of? Those scientific element only verified recently. Before being verified it's still a myth. So your best assesmnt would be that Muhammed just guessing, but then you run into another problem as how a person could guess so many things right... As you well aware that many ancient figure tend to post so many theories or claim yet a lot of them contain mistakes that we verify today, just look at those Bible writers or Greek figures like galen and others many thing they said some are truth and some false. Another question why wouldnt Muhammad follow those figures and states whatever was in his mind he believe to be true, and why would a fake prophet care about what future generations gonna say about his works... As obviously he's not gonna gain any benefit from us right?

[@IbnWobbler]

@@doomboi4675 you are making a lot of claims from emotion and no backing. Prove it .

[@doomboi4675]

​​@@ukimenustah26 Their descriptions are literally 1 for 1 matched lol 😂

[@bryceanderson7468]

Cheers for the upload, hope ur gonna continue inshallah❤

[@xr69z]

my bru is back

[@abdot604]

the miracle is the quran Corrects the previous scriptures, when i watch a video about this made by the muslim metaphysician it opened my eyes.

[@obayda_8194]

The amount of effort this guy makes to learn the faith and increase his Iman makes me ashamed of myself. Keep it up brother, may Allah accept your hard work and grant you jannah 🌿🌹

[@Anandkumhar420]

Salam brother from Indian subcontinent

[@salvatorearanzulla9104]

awesome work for a 16-17 years old. you're very competent

[@7years6months3days5hours7min]

Say mashallah

[@Ondonol_]

Assalamu alaykum brother great video.

[@binkhadem]

First! Members early access get gud 🥱

[@revertakh1235]

Allahumma barik, great work bro

[@dsjn712]

AlhamdulliLAH for Islam ❤ AlhamdulliLAH for being Muslims ❤ BarakaAllahu feekum Wassalam WBT 🌎 Ummah of 2.2 billion believers and the fastest growing Faith across the globe and the most steadfast. Aameen

[@hahdgdgherfhx]

May Allah bless Ibrahim from Proving Islam

[@mostefacopywriter7157]

Subhan'Allah, no video since 6 months, and now, a video. That's a sign from Allah.

[@mondrella627]

Appreciate your work. Keep making videos!💯

[@omartherandomguy8566]

May Allah reward you.

[@cozmoduck]

W video jan, bros schedule is getting better 1 video at a time :))

[@MH-bf4uu]

This is actually amazing! I've never seen such an in depth explanation whilst being completely rational about it!

[@zub41r75]

Masha Allah. May Allah take you from strength to strength my brother. Your videos are clear and easy to take in. Keep up the good work.

[@khaledmagdy8824]

May Allah bless you, You really convinced me that it is important to know if the sura was Meccia or Madania to understand the context. Thanks

[@usmanmukhtar222]

THE GOAT IS BACK. Seriously even as a born muslim your videos have increased my iman and conviction in Islam so much.

[@yourlocalhalal]

0:26 21st century humor goes wild lol

[@ghulamhussainhussain7214]

May Allah give you a great reward for this, Ameen Keep up the good work

[@mohamedhashim9183]

Brother always make videos like these because it helps me strengthen my iman. May Allah reward you for all this. Thanks for your content

[@GeNiUs_-]

Great video, brother, May Allah bless you. I was that guy that used those "goofy" miracles as the prove of Islam, but your proves are far more great and useful in arguments

[@inesatt1313]

Thank you,you truly spoke honestly and perceptively

[@ishadopu7702]

This is a great video Salam from🇧🇩

[@whatdoesthhisevendo]

Inshallah you get more popular bro. Thank you for making this video❤

[@hiba-yy5py]

Thank you for this video, Jan. Recently I have been struggling with my Iman, and your videos help me tremendously wallahi, please continue to make them. Your knowledge and intellect is inspiring mashAllah, and you will be rewarded greatly Insha’Allah🤍

[@ooze91]

Thank you for this great video!

[@WelcomeToTheRezvolution]

Thanking for also promoting Proving Islam Channel!

[@boonraypipatchol7295]

Looking at Gaza, They pray every day... All day... Look, What Allah is giving them for 10 months...

[@Abdullah-kw6kk]

subscribed on both accounts, so it's surprising that close to 90% aren't subscribed 11:02. Any Muslim who isn't subscribed should be ashamed because this guy is doing what many of us are ignoring.

[@7avdes]

no neec to shame anybody lol

[@cyberyousef7519]

Bro is finally back

[@TheWarningMessage]

"Islam" means "Submission to Adonai/Elohim/Alaha(Aramaic)/ilah/Allah/Creator/One God." A "Muslim" is someone who submits their will to the Creator with correct belief. Adam (Adam PBUH), Ibrahim (Abraham PBUH), Nuh (Noah PBUH), Musa (Moses PBUH), Isa (Jesus PBUH), and Mohammad (PBUH) all submitted their will to Allah/Creator. So, they were all Muslims. Allah/Creator(God of Abraham) is the founder of Islam. Shariah/Commandments/Fiqh is given by the Creator, and Prophets and Messengers implemented it. The Quran is the last word of the God of Abraham (ﷺ)/the Creator, which is considered the final testament. In the Quran, the Creator speaks directly to its readers, giving commandments for worship and daily life rules. It also explains what happened to Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, and clarifies who the God/Creator is. "This day have I perfected your religion for you and completed My favor upon you and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.” [Quran 5:3] "And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him, and in the life to come he shall be among the losers.” [Quran 3:85] "Verily the only acceptable religion to Allah is Islam." [Quran 3:19]

[@svakauts]

great video, tho u should have added more of the proofs presented in the "A Brief Illustrated Guide to Understanding Islam" lil book

[@Mallallah]

Wonderful video my friend keeps the channel going 👍

[@rxhufgh]

Excellent video brother I would to see more of these proof style videos maybe even talking about preservation of the Quran or the qirats

[@easycall69]

the palm one is actually hilarous i blame Facebook for spreading these goofy lies tho 😭

[@mrcool7740]

Asslalamu Alaikum, Great video! Only one thing: You mentioned one day for Allah is like a thousand days for us. The correct statement is one day for Allah is like one thousand years for us. Jazak Allah Khairan,

[@faresawwad8996]

Mashallah you are back

[@ghaliblaith9733]

You could've mentioned Muhammad SAW's prophecies as well

[@peazout]

Asalam-O-Alaikum wa rahmatUllahi wa barakatuh, great video brother Allahumma barik. One thing you could add is that in: (Job 26:11) it says The pillars that hold up the sky tremble and in (Quran 31:10) He created the heavens without pillars-as you can see

[@SyedAhmedJaved]

Wa ʿalaykum us-Salām wa-Raḥmatullāhi wa-Barakātuh

[@Azizullah95th]

Allahumah barik. Thank you for the information may Allah bless you, Ameen.

[@oiyile1971]

JazakAllahu Khairan

[@JanRyczkowski]

wa iyyak

[@salah__ad_deen]

جزاك اللهُ خيرًا بارك الله فيك أحبك في الله أخي يهديكم الله و يصلح بالكم ‏ ‏تقبل الله منا ومنكم بأمان الله آمين يارب العالمين

[@Ondonol_]

Will you make more refutation videos in the future?

[@JanRyczkowski]

Inshallah

[@Ondonol_]

​@@JanRyczkowskiInshallah

[@ukimenustah26]

​@@JanRyczkowskiplease collab with other Dai and make full refutasion for all arguments against Quran preservation. Everytime I search for Quran preservation on KZbin or other platform otientalis videos always come out first 😢

[@MAX-yd2bs]

Btw, the hand thing isn't goofy at all, it's not like we try to make it look like the numbers, it actually does. Right hand is 18 left hand is 81 the sum is 99 (the number of God's names) and the subtraction is 63 (the age the prophet pbuh passed away)

[@UltimateSpiderMan]

god has more than 99 names

[@MAX-yd2bs]

@@UltimateSpiderMan The ones that were meant for us human to know, are 99 names, chosen by God.

[@UltimateSpiderMan]

@@MAX-yd2bs there are more in the ahadith, and more across history and its also odd to have the age of the prophet as if humans didn't have it before he came to be, the number of arabic didn't exist before our skin

[@MAX-yd2bs]

@@UltimateSpiderMan Ik, I'm not saying things like this is clear cut evidence. I'm saying people have a reason to keep mention this point. Sure you could say it mentions 99 and 63 and that is a coincidence. Or you could say otherwise. That's up to you. It's not evidence as much as it is... there. Either ways, no my friend. Beside the 99 names, God had not mentioned an6 other ones for us as far as i know. Sure you could call God some good names like 'The Beautiful' or 'The Best', which people do when they ask for help, for example 'O The One who doesn't forget his servants...' But these aren't names declared by God himself. Allah just mentioned his 99 names. No more, no less.

[@abdusqamar9667]

It's not a good proof cause some people have different lines in their hands also. It comes across as mystical and stuff I have friends who are Hindus and many of their proofs are like this, which i mean fair enough but it's not concrete evidence.

[@fancydoggy]

When one of you recites the Shahada (at the final part of salah/namaz), let him seek refuge in Allah from four things: "O Allah, I seek refuge in You from the punishment of "Hell, from the punishment of the grave, from the trials [fitnah] of life and death, and from the evil of the trial [fitnah] of the Antichrist [dajjal]" إِذَا تَشَهَّدَ أَحَدُكُمْ فَلْيَسْتَعِذْ باللَّهِ مِن أَرْبَعٍ يقولُ: "اللَّهُمَّ إنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِن عَذَابِ جَهَنَّمَ، وَمِنْ عَذَابِ القَبْرِ، وَمِنْ فِتْنَةِ المَحْيَا وَالْمَمَاتِ، وَمِنْ شَرِّ فِتْنَةِ المَسِيحِ الدَّجَّالِ" (allahuma 'iniy 'aeudh bik min eadhab jahanama, wamin eadhab alqabri, wamin fitnat almahya walmamati, wamin shari fitnat almasih aldajaal) Also, beware of gossiping, backbiting, idle talk, slander, not cleaning after yourself (well) when you finish your visit to the bathroom (get rid of all the impurities on your body parts, and clothes too with water). كذلك احذر من الغيبة والنميمة واللغو والقذف وعدم التطهر (حسناً) بعد الانتهاء من دخول الحمام (تخلص من جميع الشوائب الموجودة على أعضاء جسمك وملابسك أيضاً بالماء). Also say, اللهُمَّ اجْعَلْنَا مُفْلِحِينَ "O Allah make us of his righteous servants" (allhuma ajealna muflihin)

[@nabibbs2402]

Brother jay is back 🔥🔥 may allah make it easy for you

[@monummos]

Job well done yet again Janku may Allah keep us all steadfast ameen

[@AbdullahUthman]

3:58 Just a correction: The Prophet ﷺ did not die from the poisoned food. Poison does not take years to effect.

[@ukimenustah26]

The poison did have some effect though

[@Myssiah]

@@ukimenustah26 he could feel some effect of the poison before his death but it wasn't the reason, the reason was a fever. much like how some symptoms get worse when you have a fever, but they aren't the cause of it.

[@wakannnai1]

Great video! Another major point to compound on your major point of it being impossible for Muhammad s.a.w. to know exactly what was in the Bible is that at the time (600-700AD) it was almost impossible for anyone other than the clergymen of the Church to have a copy of the Bible due to a large number of reasons, one of the main reasons being costs. At this time, the printing press hadn't been invented, and books (especially one as long as the Bible) would have to be hand copied in order to be distributed. In addition it was strictly forbidden for the Bible to be translated at all at the time by the Catholic Church which meant all stories that could have been passed on to Muhammad s.a.w. by Christians would have been at best 2nd hand accounts (unlikely) or 3rd or 4th hand accounts. All of these would have been significantly distorted which makes it historically impossible for Muhammad s.a.w. to know the contents of the Bible or the Torah.

[@rox_d_ae]

Need more from you brother 🙌

[@BlazySM-qp4yn]

Baraka Allahou fiik 😊 thank you so much akhi

[@alieusanyang8671]

bro is back

[@Jeebs544]

Brother alhamdulillah this is just great video. Still insincere non-Muslims are just gonna come in the comments and make more baseless claims. May Allah reward you for your efforts.

[@mznxbcv12345]

Surah Al-Imran Aya 49, of the Quran states that jesus was sent to the israelites, although written over 1,300 years ago in the 19th century (same century bible was only transtalted into Arabic in as well) they came to the same conclusion, He never used or heard the words Christian or Christianity or any equivalent of either. Paul had neither met nor seen Jesus, his relation to the twelve apostles was one of decided independence and even of opposition. He acknowledged no subordination to them. He addressed no doctrinal epistle to them or their churches, and received none from them. He made no reports to them. He did not correspond with them regularly. They never invited him to preach to their congregations and he never invited them to address his converts. He declared that he did not owe his conversion, his baptism, or his doctrine to the twelve, and that he never spent any long time in Jerusalem or in Judea as a Christian missionary. He claimed to be an apostle by a secret divine commission, but the twelve never admitted the validity of his claim. They never gave him the title of apostle; they never said anything indicative of willingness to admit him into their councils. Vacancies occurred in their number, but they never chose him to a vacant place, rather we have statements of Peter with regards to Paul which show nothing but animosity: "And if our Jesus appeared to you also and became known in a vision and met you as angry with an enemy [recall: Paul had his vision while still persecuting the Christians: Acts 9], yet he has spoken only through visions and dreams or through external revelations. But can anyone be made competent to teach through a vision? And if your opinion is that that is possible, why then did our teacher spend a whole year with us who were awake? How can we believe you even if he has appeared to you?… But if you were visited by him for the space of an hour and were instructed by him and thereby have become an apostle, then proclaim his words, expound what he has taught, be a friend to his apostles and do not contend with me, who am his confidant; for you have in hostility withstood me, who am a firm rock, the foundation stone of the Church" -Homily 17 Section XIX On the pauline credo currently called trinitanity Peter said "For some from among the Gentiles have rejected my lawful preaching and have preferred a lawless and absurd doctrine to the man who is my enemy. And indeed some have attempted, while I am still alive, to distort my words by interpretations of many sorts, as if I taught the dissolution of the law… But that may God forbid ! For to do such a thing means to act contrary to the Law of God which was made to Moses and was confirmed by our Lord in its everlasting continuance. For he said, “The heaven and the earth will pass away, but not one jot or one tittle shall pass away from the Law.” -Letter of Peter to James, 2.3-5 Soon after Jesus had selected his twelve apostles, according to Luke, he " gave them power and authority over all devils and to cure diseases. And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick. And he said unto them: 'Take nothing for your journey, neither staves nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece. And whatsoever house ye enter, there abide and thence depart. And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them." This is the entire charge of Jesus to his apostles when he sent them out to convert the world, as reported by Luke, who claims to give the address or a portion of it, and that presumably the most important portion, word for word. The language here attributed to Jesus conveys no idea that he had any purpose of founding a new church. Neither here nor anywhere else, in the language attributed to him in the New Testament, does he explain the phrase " the kingdom of God " to mean a new ecclesiastical organization. In several passages he does use it to signify the celestial dominion after the destruction of the world; and this is therefore presumably its meaning everywhere. The gospel of Matthew is much further than that of Luke in its report of the charge of Jesus to his apostles: "These twelve Jesus sent forth and commanded them, saying: 'Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.", "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth; I am come not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother... He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet, shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward." This charge, as reported by Matthew omitted nearly all the main ideas that would have been appropriate in an address instructing the twelve to preach the foundation of Christianity. It does not say whether Jesus wished to reform or to supersede Judaism; whether his principal purpose was ecclesiastical, moral, political, or sanitary. The remarks about healing the sick and casting out devils is the most explicit of all the instructions. Certainly no reader can learn from that charge that Jesus intended to establish a new religion; and much less can he learn any feature of the faith or discipline of a projected new church. And this address is that portion of the New Testament where such information should be given most clearly. He made no doctrinal definition and no ecclesiastical organization. He did not use the key words of the original doctrines necessary to Christianity or a new church, nor the keywords of ideas afterwards associated with Christianity, such as Incarnation, Trinity, Immaculate Conception, and Transubstantiation. The subjects to which the most space or most prominence is given in the sayings attributed, in the gospels, to Jesus, are, First, the Mosaic law; Second, judgment day; Third, faith; Fourth, the sins of the Pharisees; Fifth, ascetic morality; and Sixth, his divine commission. Triune nonsense is straight out of the Roman Pantheon. Hercules, anyone? Cerberus? The trinity of Zeus, Athena Apollo, literally called the Triune. Greek goddess Hecate was portrayed in triplicate, a three-in-one. This was all done to make the creed more digestible, followed by mental gymnastics attempting to reconcile the onsensical with elaborate theories. Why doesn't a square peg fit into a round hole? Answer by saying it's a mystery instead of geometries not lining up. No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws. There never was such another epidemic of ecclesiastical forgery. The church was flooded with books attributed falsely to apostolic times and authors. The names of many of these books, and the texts of some, are preserved. Distinguished saints and learned fathers of the faith openly commended the invention and acceptance of false- hoods designed to aid the conversion of the world to what they believed to be truth. None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity. Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1 God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

[@Mojahid-Al-Islam]

19th?

[@mznxbcv12345]

Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself. Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted [James 1:13) God cannot be tempted (John 1:29) Jesus was seen (1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God (Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God (Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man (Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn (Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn (1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died (1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die (Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation (Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation (Mark 4:38) Jesus slept (Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep (John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful (Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful (Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing (Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing Older one is no different, Abijah was a wicked king, and had war with his rival (1. Kings 15:3). 2 Chronicles 13:3 says that Abjiah was pious ; that he took the field with 400,000 men against Jeroboam, who was at the head of 800,000 men ; and in a great battle the King of Israel was defeated, and 500,000 of his men slain. It seems that, 1,200,000 soldiers sent into the field at one time by two small tribes, and the destruction of 500,000 men in one battle, were beneath the notice of the author of Kings. How can one beieve that the One that decrees that which is a 'sin' and that which is good "die for their sins" ? He is the One who decreed it thus, can decree it not so. To whom does the One with whom final authority resides in sacrifice for? a registrar? - No. None are greater than He. Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1 God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

[@collisions4615]

Peak has returned

[@lottoman1]

Thank you brother.

[@Bacteriagirl777]

JazakAllah khair

[@JanRyczkowski]

wa iyyak

[@rashikajhan4748]

Bro is cooking damn

[@Epic_General11]

look who's back

[@jettmain5920]

mashallah bro you're too good at this jazak allah khair

[@alaaguelmaoui7253]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@Alhamdulilah123]

May Allah reward you, ameen! Please more content!!!!

[@JanRyczkowski]

Soon inshallah

[@mohamedbilelt]

Mashallah broski good job

[@Chickencee]

To begin, I’m a muslim alhamdullillah. But, to be honest, some of these arguments have quite a few holes that can pretty easily be picked at. Theres just too many ways to break many of these arguments down.

[@jobhawkanxi5285]

If Mohamed pbuh copied from the bible/tohrah he would have copied the historical errors As well (calling the king in the time of Joseph "pharaoh"). The pharaoh at time of Moses claimed divinity (the Qoran mentions it) this historical fact was not known until last century (archeological discovery)

[@farzad1021]

He doesn't copied, he most probably take an idea of it. Or he really gets it from God.

[@DiverseDivinity13]

​@@farzad1021some very small parts of the bible are from god I think, or was part of the original injil so it would make sense for some similarities

[@Snadim2005]

Love your vedios . brother ❤❤❤❤

[@BYardleyOfficial]

May Allah bless you 😊

[@a-707club6]

one the best anti-shubuhat narrative way of seera is momahmed hijab’s

[@mortarman83095]

Actually, the prophet peace be upon him has never been narrated to be precieved as generic by people who did not know him, but it does not refute your point that if the people of the book would've told him stories of prophets they would've called him out for plagiarism, it's just something worth noting as nobody has ever seen the prophet as just an average guy. Furthermore, the prophet could actually perform miracles, there are a couple narrations related to this, but he didn't rely on these miracles as his main method of dawah since obviously it would die out as soon as he'd pass away. Regarding the psalms reference, the very verse you quoted says "and a thousand years are like a day", yet this is not mentioned in the Quran. Now I don't think this disproves your point or is even relevant really, but I'd be interested in knowing why this part is omitted in the Quran, perhaps it was a corrective action too, but Allah knows best. You already mentioned the 3 important languages of the bible also, nothing else is missing really; Greek and Hebrew were the main languages in which it was recorded and Aramaic, being Jesus's presumed language is the original language of the Bible (most likely).