00:04:44 Mecca with the Kaaba was polytheistic 00:07:00 Muhammad recites Quran and dies before a written Quran is completed 00:10:14 Mecca wanted Muhammad out. Yathrib (Medina) invited Muhammad over 00:13:50 Yathrib and local expansion 00:15:56 Islamic expansion 00:18:34 Problems with Muslim narrative 00:21:14 No one knows the beginning of Islam because there is no good evidence 00:24:14 Timeline of evidence sources 00:24:42 Quran likely underwent 'evolution' until about year 700 00:26:45 Early copy of Quran from the 7th century 00:28:19 What was this text from a scholar point of view 00:30:08 Problems with early written Arabic (early Quran) 00:33:10 Believers Movement 00:37:01 Documentary evidence that Islam mingled with other 'pious' groups (Jews, Christians) 00:46:04 Islam as we now know it starts around the years 690-700 (fishing; renaming; word use) 00:50:26 How modern science collect documentary evidence 00:57:23 Interview starts 00:57:46 Q1 Does finding new things make you buzzed? 01:01:24 Q2 How do modern Muslims view your work? 01:03:45 Q3 Are the Hadith still up for interpretation with new evidence? 01:07:40 Q4 Compare historical scholar types 01:10:56 Q5 Climate evidence of volcanos causing the up rise of Islam? 01:13:31 Q6 Why did the Believers not differ too much with other pious monotheists? 01:17:24 Q7 What led the Believers requiring to have to work with others and then stop? 01:21:38 Q8 Opportunities in Germany for Islamic studies... 01:25:45 Q9 Institutionalized Islam... Sufism? 01:29:09 Q10 Line between mystic and historic Muhammad
@solyomalbazz492511 ай бұрын
After you die, you'll know the truth.
@briggsy315510 ай бұрын
Thank you 👍
@utente40688 ай бұрын
Thank you ❤️
@Tex_Arcana8 ай бұрын
MVP
@sandorrabe57457 ай бұрын
Yeah this lecture is lacking
@jalilhaqiqi188911 ай бұрын
The assertion that the Quran doesn't talk about the events around Mohammed isn't correct. It's mostly guidance addressing issues that Mohammed and Muslims are dealing with. It's not a book of religious rituals but better described as guidance on how to conduct oneself and serves as foundational legal document. Here are a few examples: 1. The Battle of Badr: Surah Al-Anfal (Chapter 8) contains several verses that deal with the Battle of Badr, a significant battle in the early years of Islam. Verses like 8:12-17 provide divine guidance and reassurance to the Muslims during this battle. 2. The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah: In Surah Al-Fath (Chapter 48), verses 48:1-29, the Quran addresses the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, a peace agreement between the Muslims and the Quraysh tribe of Mecca. This event was significant as it marked a turning point in the relations between Muslims and their opponents. 3. The Incident of Ifk: Surah An-Nur (Chapter 24) addresses the false accusation against Aisha, the wife of Prophet Muhammad, in the Incident of Ifk. Verses 24:11-20 deal with the accusations and emphasize the importance of avoiding slander and false accusations. 4. Migration to Abyssinia: Surah Az-Zumar (Chapter 39), verse 39:53, is believed to be revealed in the context of the migration of early Muslims to Abyssinia. It addresses those who might have felt despair due to the persecution they faced in Mecca. 5. Boycott of the Banu Hashim: Surah Al-Buruj (Chapter 85) discusses the persecution faced by the early Muslims, including the boycott of the Banu Hashim, Prophet Muhammad's clan, by the Quraysh tribe. 6. The Change of the Qibla: Surah Al-Baqarah (Chapter 2), verses 2:142-150, address the change of the direction of prayer (Qibla) from Jerusalem to Mecca. This was a significant event as it marked a form of separation from the previous Jewish and Christian traditions.
@You.are.boring.me.now202411 ай бұрын
All of your assertions come from much later secondary sources.
@Seker-kiz-candy-z8k10 ай бұрын
You forgot to add surahs about mohammads marriages😂
@timeread309910 ай бұрын
Ye this blue-haired old head is ignorant on islam.
@BaruchAdam-zm3nf23 күн бұрын
Fake isl.m
@IMMUSLIM10007 күн бұрын
Change of worship direction ( Qibla) from Jerushelum to Macca was/ is indication of change of imamat ( responsibility of leading people/ man kind to heavens) from Bani Israeel to Muslims
@avforme23912 жыл бұрын
At 31:36. There is a clear distinction between Muslim (Islam) and Mu'min (Iman). They are not interchangeable. There is also a third term, Ihsan. So the three terms are Islam, Iman, Ihsan. Without getting into technical details, one can say that they are three levels of one's spiritual status with God, Ihsan being the highest. These terms are not used randomly in the Qur'an, and they have not come to mean/signify anything different over time. I am surprised Mr. Donner is not aware of the ample literature available on the subject.
@allycat58922 жыл бұрын
muslim means a person who submits to God, Islam means submission (has other meanings such as peace), Mu'min means believer, iman means faith. These are all different words.
@Be9caution5 ай бұрын
I was shocked at some of the things the professor was saying. It seemed like he was trying to make things confusing for himself and others, when all these things are super clarified in Islamic texts
@austinitesince1979 Жыл бұрын
interesting lecture and talk. I thought I was unfamiliar with this guy, and then I was trying to tell my mom about what I was "learning"... about the "creation of Islam"... from this video, about a professor from Chicago studying arabic texts in Germany and Vienna, and then my mom asks "Is it Fred Donner? He's ___'s husband" oh wow lol! The professor's wife is one of my mom's best friends hahaha! crazy ;p
@withtanweer Жыл бұрын
This was so interesting and fun 😆 !
@thefakewitchdoctor Жыл бұрын
Can you tell us why he has a patch of blue hair, please?
@humanbeing859811 ай бұрын
Well you should tell your mother that this guy is lying about Islam, if you want to learn about something ask it's people, you don't learn math from a literature teacher. also if you want to learn about a religion read it's book and see if it looks like the word of god or the word of men.
@davidlamb752410 ай бұрын
@@thefakewitchdoctor It looks like the result of an accident. Or maybe he wants to show some solidarity with the "woke" ?
@hugheypmorgan957610 ай бұрын
The blue hair?
@architecturalmind3 жыл бұрын
Lecturer: any questions? Audience: everybody raises their hands Lecturer: any question not about my blue hair? Audience: everybody lowers their hands
@georgialenny62653 жыл бұрын
Man...I need answers too...I thought I was seeing things..
@hhmaster7893 жыл бұрын
What’s the answer?
@lm70923 жыл бұрын
Blue hair. Why not?
@hhmaster7893 жыл бұрын
@@lm7092 stop making me laugh 😆
@HotelCharliHill3 жыл бұрын
I am wondering if that was some sort of political statement or a really terrible style choice.
@BryanKirch2 жыл бұрын
Imagine having to give this presentation 20 minutes after your granddaughter gives you a surprise makeover. Excellent composer given the circumstances.
@BryanKirch2 жыл бұрын
@ArchKomposer yeah. Goofy granddaughter. I mean no full grown adult male would decide to die their own hair blue. Had to be his granddaughter right?
@islamisthetruewaytogod68122 жыл бұрын
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------------
@latifhasani4744 Жыл бұрын
Excellent narrative the best among the recent scholars,objective and fair congratulations ❤❤🎉
@sweynforkbeard8857 Жыл бұрын
Nah, he just uses one of those old-style ink pens with an ink well and did not notice he got ink on his hands and brushed back his hair.
@Hannestv4607 Жыл бұрын
It is very easy to refute Islam! Because the God of Islam does not know that according to Christianity God incarnated True love = the love of God! *God himself went to the cross for you out of love for you as a human being* Philippians 2:5-8
@basitali95832 жыл бұрын
Correct me if i am wrong!! As far as i know, In the Quran, there was a very clear distinction given between the believers(muslims) and Non muslims(christians and jews) who were referred to as “the people of the book”. There is literally a list of traits for a person to be a rightfull believer mentioned in the Quran itself.
@ems82902 жыл бұрын
Not quite... My understanding is that within the Quraan, anyone can be defined as a Muslim as long as they are righteous, belive in the last day, and in god regardless of their faith...
@VenugopalanV-v5x2 жыл бұрын
@@ems8290 Not Really. One can be a Muslim only when he accepts that there is only one God that is Allah and Allah’s messenger that is Mohammed. All others are Kafirs and Kafirs can live only if they pay Jizia. The other option is death by a Sword. People like you either knowingly spread a wrong information to pain Islam in a palatable form. Islam is not a religion per Se. It is a Militant Political Ideology. There is no place for Spirituality or Humanity in Islam.
@ems82902 жыл бұрын
@@VenugopalanV-v5x Quranically that’s not the case! This definition as per what you heard is a later definition which seems to have evolved… however within the quraan your definition isn’t the case
@paspep2 жыл бұрын
In fact, you are wrong, Coran is just a pile of shit designed to control loww minded persons, are you one of them ??? The ball is in your hand. If you are dumb and fall for it.... Accept a life of submission and darkness Just live your life, dont wait fir others to tell you how to think, how to feel, how to think
@ems82902 жыл бұрын
@@paspep sure… I hope you have a good life my friend
@bachirbenchoukroun4946 Жыл бұрын
Arabic pronunciation is surprisingly refined.
@joshuaowen11234 жыл бұрын
Came for the blue hair, stayed for the lecture.
@explodinggaming18934 жыл бұрын
same
@fanny35534 жыл бұрын
I was like is it just me of the camera angle?
@ramezaziz23363 жыл бұрын
There's blue hair?
@thenationalist023 жыл бұрын
Islam is the most dangerous belief in the world👿 It's a curse to Humanity. God Save this World from threat of islam
@lucis34523 жыл бұрын
@@thenationalist02 Muslims see you as the enemy so what makes your opinion right? Are you Christian?
@JohnDoe-bt4ps4 жыл бұрын
He is doing the blue streak challenge for diabetes.. a simple Google search revealed it. I didn't know either.
@triggerwarning29824 жыл бұрын
Right on, I would’ve had a hard time taking him seriously if this was just his day to day hairdo lol
@JohnDoe-bt4ps4 жыл бұрын
@@triggerwarning2982 I will admit at first glance it can be disconcerting.....
@juusohamalainen75074 жыл бұрын
People look ridiculous anyways in any case. That is how my dog thinks about human apes.
@triggerwarning29824 жыл бұрын
Juuso Hämäläinen What a moronic statement. Do you think you can read your dogs mind? You sound like the son of Sam. What’s your view on morality? Are morals objective or subjective in your opinion?
@juusohamalainen75074 жыл бұрын
@@triggerwarning2982 Do you think anything as ugly as a human looks good? Dog is man's best friend hence we have a special mental connection between us which women never can understand. Think about that..
@emrahyalcin Жыл бұрын
could somebody tell me what he is saying at 01:00:54 - 01:01:00 . I am not native speaker and I try to follow from subtitle. But at the time, I can't comprhened.
@jakesabean Жыл бұрын
“they’re still not open, we do not know what is inside them” English is my first language and that was hard to understand 😂
@abuhawee17 күн бұрын
The moment you historically accepted prophet Mohammed existed, it is worthless to come up with alternative theories about how Islam came about. The only reason why Arabs were willing to sacrifice their lives and leave their homes is to spread the Quran and at least give the people the freedom to choose,accept Islam or pay taxes Jiziah .
@NickVenture12 жыл бұрын
The big problem with a lot of the archived materials is the missing digitalisation and online availability for everybody. This slows down the research worldwide. The decision to rather spend billions on other projects is taken by governments and the archive custodians. Some simply want to keep a control and power. To humiliate humans who must surrender and crawl on the doorsteps of their treasure vaults. With lengthy procedures and appointments. Nothing of this will be required if the stuff they hoard since centuries is finally made accessible in a dignifying fashion appropriate for a 21st century. And that these archive prison guards show more respect and less arrogance towards the millions of smart humans who will be able to discover far more in the collections than what a jealous bureaucratic hoarder will be able to read out between his coffee pauses, lunch times and holidays. Not to forget here that restrictions due to copy rights and cash grabbing business of state owned archives have to be terminated. For the sake of human right to its past without kisses to the feet of the archive priesthood.
@elVagabondo2 жыл бұрын
you are a legend
@islamisthetruewaytogod68122 жыл бұрын
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------------
@jairajlsingh2 жыл бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812 Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind.
@aliceelborjo7074 Жыл бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812 Thank you for so knowledgeably, truthfully and eloquently presenting the TRUTH to all who look for the truth with an open heart and mind. Atheists mock God "apparently God speaks Arabic...." as was said here and either through ignorance or intent to distort historical information are surely the lowest of the low since they inadvertently, or with true intent do the very same work of the accursed Satan who has vowed to bring mankind down and away from the belief and faith in One True God and all His messengers from our Father Adam all the way down to the last and final Messenger and Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). My blood was literally boiling listening to this lecture and I am so happy I found someone who spoke the truth in this regard. May Allah guide all those sincere people who seek truth to The Truth...AMEEN.
@aliceelborjo7074 Жыл бұрын
@@jairajlsingh What does your comment actually mean, anyway.? The first part of it, makes no sense, and as for the second part, modern 20th century science proves the very existence of God, as these numerous scientific discoveries are present in the Quran. God created everything in existence , the Universe and all that's in it. Science is just a human word given to a human explanation to limited himan knowledge of our existence. Look into ......"Scientific Miracles in the Qur'an "
@walidkhier2 жыл бұрын
I stopped after the first six minutes. Incredibly superficial and missing pivotal details. Hard to believe theis shortage is because of time limitations. I will mentioned only three of my remarks here: 1- the major religious stream in Mecca was the belief of Ibrahim (Abraham). The people of Mecca believed in the one God. However, many of them had distorted views of the one God and worshipped him differently. 2- Prophet Mohammed was a descendant of Ibrahim and one of the minority that didn't go astray. 3-Prophet Mohammed, like all messengers of god before him, never claimed to be a founder of a new belief, rather, commanded to reform the original belief, and his message complements this belief to be a comprehensive way of life.
@sashamoore96917 ай бұрын
Shut up. U only stopped bc u couldn’t stand that ur religion is a ped0file azz one, a dumb one, and everyone knows Islam is a crock of shxt
@paulm888518 күн бұрын
If Muhammad's behavior was as described in history. It appears he pailed in comparison to other biblical prophets. 🤔
@wrdennig Жыл бұрын
I so much appreciate this type of exchange of information. So many talks on KZbin are adversarial and distracting.
@mznxbcv123454 ай бұрын
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha" too sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@ranro73714 ай бұрын
Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts. Constantine chose regularly to refer to himself as the “servant of God” (famulus dei/therapon tou theou) in official writings. By the fifth century, this metaphor of subordination had been redeployed from theological to political contexts as the subjects of the emperor came to refer to themselves as “slaves of the emperor.” And by the sixth, Justinian insisted all his officials swear an oath that they would demonstrate their service to the emperor “with genuine slavehood” (gnesia douleia).b Building on Paul’s revalorization of the vocabulary of slavery, and particularly the word doulos came to be applied to a variety of hierarchical relationships, even as it also continued to be used specifically of chattel slaves. By the middle Byzantine period, this expansion of the semantic range of the root doul- eventually gave the abstract nominal form douleia, meaning laborer Insofar as everyone who partook in labor was considered to be a participant This epistemological world view is coherent with master-slave dynamic relationship between the head of the state and his subjects, or rather slaves. The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit." This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@wrdennig4 ай бұрын
In response to "Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries." When did Hebrew fall out of use? And, what were the cultural/societal conditions that led to that? And what caused the reemergence?
@mznxbcv123454 ай бұрын
Languages degrade, they do not "evolve". It is a tool for thinking, not communication, it is what seperates other lifeforms from humans. The mere fact that translation is even possible underlies a common origin for all languages, orca whales seperated from their birth pod are unable to communicate with other whales if they get adopted, they are only able to track the others visually. Mecca is mentioned in the Assyrian inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III (8th century BC) as Makan, a region ruled by the Arab queen Samsi. Others have proposed that Mecca is referred to in the Old Testament as Paran or Teman, places associated with Ishmael and his descendants. Still others have pointed out that Mecca is attested in some ancient South Arabian inscriptions as Makkah or Makkahum, meaning "temple" or "sanctuary". The name of Mecca is first recorded by the Greek geographer Ptolemy, who calls it Macoraba in the 2nd century AD but Greek has a limited ability of capturing Arabic it is infact Markorava (Μακόραβα) and not Macroba as is often localized Greek is known to morph to suit tongue of speakers, the word for Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The original is "Isa" as it is in the Quran Arabic. Classical Arabic has largest phonemic inventories among semitic languages. It has 28 consonants (29 with Hamza) and 6 vowels (3 short and 3 long). Some of these sounds are rare or absent in other semitic languages. For example, - Classical Arabic has two pharyngeal consonants /ʕ/ (ع) and /ħ/ (ح). These sounds are found only in some semitic languages (Hebrew and Amharic), but not in others (Akkadian and Aramaic). - Classical Arabic has two emphatic consonants /sˤ/ (ص) and /dˤ/ (ض) These sounds are found only in some semitic languages (Hebrew and Amharic), but not in others (Akkadian and Aramaic). - Classical Arabic has two glottal consonants /ʔ/ (ء) and /h/ (ه), which are produced by opening and closing the glottis ). Akkadian has lost the glottal stop /ʔ/, while Aramaic has lost both the glottal stop and the glottal fricative /h/. - Classical Arabic has six vowel phonemes /a/, /i/, /u/, /æ /, /e/, /o/, which can be short or long. Akkadian has only three vowel phonemes /a/, /i/, /u/, which can be short or long, while Aramaic has only two vowel phonemes /a/ and /i/, which can be short or long. |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Let's start with a simple sentence: ## The house is big Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). hbrew was considered dead by 0 C.E. time, hence "Aramaic" was spoken Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing? Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@shoa4566 Жыл бұрын
His grand daughters came over on the weekend and thought this was an excellent idea. His toe nails are pink. That tea party was off the charts.
@paulm888518 күн бұрын
I wish he would have expanded why he doesn't like the term conquest. I mean the spread was religion inspired. But when you use armies to consolidate power.and territory. That's pretty much a conquest.
@josm148115 күн бұрын
It's not clear the early spread was solely by conquest. Certainly if islam was a brand new religion it would have been. But if it was just another flavour of Christianity etc it's possible many more easily converted.
@paulm888515 күн бұрын
@@josm1481 very 👍
@josm148115 күн бұрын
@@paulm8885 Donner falls into the same trap he warns against. Which is so easily done, as Islam is so authoritarian at every turn it's followers ignore the facts and simply state their narrative IS fact. For example, Donner calls Muhammad prophet. Sebeos never calls him a prophet. He calls him a holy man, a pious leader of the SARACENS (not Ms). There is no evidence for early Islam, as Donner admits, and nearly all imagery at the time is Christian. There's a strong suggestion it was a legacy of the many non Trinitarian Judeo-Christian groups around at the time. Probably a more zealous group of 'believers', cult etc. Which would explain why it spread so quickly and had relatively little reaction. 1. It was Christianity, just a different type 2. There might still have been uncomfortable concerts to Trinitarianism in the regions anyway.
@josm148111 күн бұрын
@@paulm8885 it looks like 'Islam' was really an anti Trinitarian Judeo-Christian sect, at least up to mid 8th century. By which time most of the 'Islamic' world had been conquered. Not, the Goths in Spain called them Moors and Unitarians till the mid 8th century. I'm assuming, at which point one of the kings decided to make this a distinguished, separate state religion.
@paulm888510 күн бұрын
@josm1481 Interesti g 🤔. Islam recognizes the OT. Isaiah 48:16,17 seems to speak of The Trinity. But the greater point is that empires are built of conquests. I think the speaker wishes to sanitize a less than pure history. 🤔
@jeangatti93844 ай бұрын
the quran does not refer to a city of Mecca located in the Hidjaz, this is a later lecture created by the abbassid caliphs (in the late 9th and 10th century) in order to invent a new religion suited for their goals of conquest and war and domination. They needed a place nobody knew, in the middle if nowhere.
@noammkw37702 ай бұрын
exactly i believe the stories about muhammed are collections of tales and stories of the rulers/army generals/spiritual leaders in the arabian peninsula, and is mixed into one character who did it all
@Xoxxooxxxoo16 күн бұрын
Every historian admits he existed.@@noammkw3770
@melekozhan98712 күн бұрын
Şam bölgesi olarak geçen Ürdün İsrail Kudüsü içine alan yer hz muhammed s.a.v. Efendimizin doğduğu bölge olduğu kaynaklardan bakılınca net olarak görünüyor.abbasilerin yeni mekkesi yeni dini komple yalandır.zemzem kuyusu yalandır.akabe camisi yalandır.medine ile Şam arasında islamiyet yaşanmıştır.daha aşağısı vahabi çölleri asla yok kaynaklarda.pers Bizans Sasaniler hepsinin aldığı çok önemli şehir Şam bölgesidir.ürdün İsrail filistin Kudüs bölgeleri yani.tarihin tek kutsal bölgesi sadece ve sadece orası olmuştur bütün dinlerde ve putperest dinlerde.kısacası mekke isimli şehir gerçekten varmıydı ozamanlar kutsal Şam bölgesinde veya adı neydi bunlar saklanıyor.tek din müslümanlık olarak geçer kuranı kerimde.ibrahim a.s başlar muhammed a.s biter.yer ve din tek bir bölgede tüm insanlara gelmiştir.musa .a.s İsa a.s Muhammed a.s. tek bir bölgeye şama geldi.kutsal mabed orada Musa İsa muhammed peygamberlerimizin hepsi aynı mabed yani Kabe yi kutsal olarak bilir.ve bu kabe İbrahim a.s. yaptığı temel nerede ise orası kabedir.şuanki kabe yeri yalandır.adem a.s. dan muhammed aleyhisselâma kadar Kabe’nin yeri tekti.Muhammed aleyhisselâmdan 50 yıl sonra yıktılar.hacerül esved taşını alıp şuanki çöle koydular.neden hrıstıyan yahudı mumınler kabeye gitmiyor da.kudus civarında hac yapıyor.tek bir yere hac ettik 680 yılına kadar da şimdi neden ayrıldık.kabe hepimizin.bütün dinler için kutsal.
@jeffmarlatt65382 жыл бұрын
The "lawyer'' at 1 hour 11 minute mark couldn't ask a simple and clear question when given 2 chances to do so.
@espadagt19342 жыл бұрын
And actually Quran references contemporaneous historical events such as the defeat of the "Romans" (Byzantium) at Sura 30:2-4 which corresponds to a Byzantine defeat at Antioch in 613.
@gordonfrickers5592 Жыл бұрын
Yes but who really wrote the Quran, why and when? Many people who firmly believe there is only one Almighty have grave doubts about the authenticity of the Quran and it's self contradictory messages many of which are racist, theocratic and elitist.
@youknowwhatyouhavedones7044 Жыл бұрын
Depends which reading you read lol. Some say win some say defeat
@berdigylychrejepbayev7503 Жыл бұрын
@@youknowwhatyouhavedones7044 really? the one mentions defeat was the least reliable. even though some claim that "defeat" come from Muslims. So even your least reliable reading has some claim about future which had come true
@Wise__guy Жыл бұрын
@@youknowwhatyouhavedones7044 what no are you on about 😊
@youknowwhatyouhavedones7044 Жыл бұрын
@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503 are you normal? They we’re constantly fighting it’s only two possibilities of it going🤣
@junevandermark9523 жыл бұрын
No matter which religion, I suggest it is only because humans are so harsh and judgmental of each other, that so many are willing to place faith in the existence of a harsh and judge-mental god.
@islamisthetruewaytogod68122 жыл бұрын
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------------
@junevandermark9522 жыл бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812 Had you been born into a Christian culture, you would be posting to me that to have my soul saved, I would have to believe Jesus is my savior. Which religion you "belong to" is based on where you were born and raised. The truth of that matter will set you free of all religion. Been there ... did that.
@junevandermark9522 жыл бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812 My guess is, the existence of gods and devils and all stories of the supposed supernatural, started back in the caveman days, when they knew nothing about the subject of hallucinations. From the book … Hallucinations … author … Oliver Sacks Hallucinatory experiences, whatever their cause, generate a world of imaginary beings and abodes-heaven, hell, fairyland. Such myths and beliefs are designed to clarify and reassure and, at the same time, to frighten and warn. We make narratives for a nocturnal experience which is common, real and physiologically based. When traditional figures-devils, witches, or hags-are no longer believed in, new ones-aliens, visitations from “a previous life”-take their place. Hallucinations, beyond any other waking experience, can excite, bewilder, terrify, or inspire, leading to the fokelore and the myths (sublime, horrible, creative, and playful) which perhaps no individual and no culture can wholly dispense with.
@fabak Жыл бұрын
@@junevandermark952 Wow. you are lying
@junevandermark952 Жыл бұрын
@@fabak You have to believe that you see evil in others, before you can believe in the existence of a judge-mental god. If you believed that you saw only goodness in others, you would not be ABLE to worship an image of a judge-mental god, because you would think that if such a being existed ... it would be a horrible bully to pick on such wonderful people. Do you believe that is also a lie? You DO believe that YOU are wonderful ... don't you. Or do you believe that you also are an evil sinner ... not worthy of any kindness from a judge-mental god?
@martinan224 жыл бұрын
About the climate question ~1:10-1:13. The years 535-536 saw the most extreme climate the last 2000 years, probably from vulcanic eruption. This affected communities in the north more thought, maybe 50% of population in Scandinavia starved to death, than in the ME. Furthermore, there is no need to seek for climate catastrophe. Since Islam rose against the backdrop of the Justinian plague 541-549 AD and against the backdrop of the terrible devastating horrible war between the Sassanids and Byzantine empire 572-591 that laid waste to the ME. So, the question had some foundation but was overall pretty uninformed.
@josephdettelis53974 жыл бұрын
Some good points you are making.
@muhammedali25784 жыл бұрын
U clearly state abattle between the Persians and romans that happened 8yrs prior to the conquest andforget the Rida wars fought by the caliphate in arabia at its juvenile stages. So tell me what you say about that
@martinan224 жыл бұрын
@@muhammedali2578 The question I was commenting. Was speculating about a destabalizing climate catastrophe paving the way for the Arab explosion. My answer is that no such climate catastrophy is necessary. The war between the Sassanid Empire and the Roman Empire depleted their resouces. But more importantly, delegitimized them in the Levant. The war seesawed back and forth, back and forth, across the Levant. First the Sassanids sacking a city. Then a year after, the Romans sacking that city. Then the Sassanids sacking and massmurdering again. I believe that this terrible war made many people in the Levant feel an utter disgust with these two outside powers that devastated THEIR region but were not based there. So, this is a much better explanation than a climate catastrophe. The early battles described in Muslim tradition are neither here nor there for this particular question. They do not affect the discussion about the conditions that preceded for the rise of Islam/the Arab empire. The early battles from Muslim tradition describe the actual process of the establishment of the rule of Islam / the Arab Empire. So, different question.
@thatisme3thatisme383 жыл бұрын
It helped but still no way in hell these empires would let go of territories of such importance without a fight. Justinian still commanded a formidable army and no doubt could conscription locally.
@martinan223 жыл бұрын
@@thatisme3thatisme38 What happened was that the Roman Empire AND the Sassanids had started to rely on Arab Foederati to maintain control of Syria and ME. Once these Foederati joined forces with one another against the two Empires, they were really strong. And the Empires stood without troops in the ME and had to bring in forces from their heartlands. Once these lost one battle, the Arabs consolidated the ME, which they had been policing anyway. I believe that the war 572-591 was the breaking point, the outside Empires had proven to all the people of the ME that they were malicious destructive parasites. First the Sassanids would sack a city, then a year later the Byzantines, then the Sassanids again. The ME just had enough and were ready to join forces with a force that arose out of the ME itself, such as the Arab Foederati. And once the ME was united, it was stronger than any of the Empires that had been feeding off it for so long.
@beak34322 жыл бұрын
29.00 is there any mention of the concept of learning Quran by heart, mentioned in this lecture? This is tradition very old. And even if the Quran was not documented until some centuries later, it WAS ´´documented ´´ / SAVED by that tradition. Especially when the Text - must have been refereed to often to deal with the situations arising in the rapid changes, political especially happening during that time. One reference in favour of this would be Shia , Sunni divide... both differing politically and and also on interpretation of the Text - nevertheless agree on the Text itself.
@allycat58922 жыл бұрын
Yes. Surah Ar-ra'd (the thunder) 13:28, says "Those who believe, and whose hearts find satisfaction in the remembrance of Allah: for without doubt in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find satisfaction". This is saying that in THE REMEMBERANCE OF ALLAH the heart finds rest (satisfaction, serenity, tranquility). How do you remember Allah? That's by remembering him through the recitation of the Quran, which means that the verses revealed to Prophet Muhammad from the very beginning was recited over and over thus knowing every word and line (Ayah) by heart. And this is how the Quran was preserved from the very beginning as the revelations began, so they were not forgotten. Today millions of Muslims around the world continues this tradition of memorizing the Quran by heart, even though after the Prophet (saw) death when it was written down for teaching and taking it to other nations.
@islamisthetruewaytogod68122 жыл бұрын
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------------
@Trials_By_Errors Жыл бұрын
The writing system was Already established. Paper was widely available. You can remember it. But writing is a better way to communicate with better Reach.
@Nipiniponipi Жыл бұрын
One little info that I would love to add is: Quran was documented during the life of prophet and was officially "groupped" as the whole book during the life of companions of the prophet. Not centuries laters
@Rtg5637 Жыл бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812 No. It is the predecessor of Nazism and atrocities for 1400 years.
@dylanx93272 жыл бұрын
32:05 - You don't need to be a believer to be a Muslim!!! Islam does NOT mean SUBMISSION, but SURRENDER!!! If Islam means 'surrender' then Muslim means 'one who surrendered.' Submission ≠ Surrender. Submission is voluntary, internal or private. Surrender is involuntary, public or political (Islam/surrender/ أَسْلَمْنَا /aslamna - in Quranic terminology is a military term). Therefore, you don't need to be a believer to be a Muslim!!!... See - verse Quran 49:14 - The Bedouins say, 'We believe.' Say: 'You do not believe; rather say, "We surrender"; for belief has not yet entered your hearts. If you obey God and His Messenger, He will not diminish you anything of your works. God is All-forgiving, All-compassionate. (Arberry translation) قَالَتِ الْأَعْرَابُ آمَنَّا ۖ قُلْ لَمْ تُؤْمِنُوا وَلَٰكِنْ قُولُوا أَسْلَمْنَا وَلَمَّا يَدْخُلِ الْإِيمَانُ فِي قُلُوبِكُمْ ۖ وَإِنْ تُطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ لَا يَلِتْكُمْ مِنْ أَعْمَالِكُمْ شَيْئًا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ
@drmodestoesq5 жыл бұрын
As is written in the ancient scriptures....If it ain't blue, it ain't true.
@twnb77334 жыл бұрын
Muhammad : A Forged Biography kzbin.info/www/bejne/pouofoF9otaBnaM
@zae5pm4 жыл бұрын
@@twnb7733 really you have brought these idiots who don't distinguish between sala (pray) and sala ala (give blessing). by the way, your David wood @$$ was kicked very hard from Muhammed hijab hhhhhh.
@sudaissohail48514 жыл бұрын
osama aljarrah Don’t worry he barely knows what he’s talking about.He believes a psychopath is the most knowledgeable person on Earth and knows everything about Islam when all he does is repeat a lie over and over again.”If you repeat a lie often enough,it will be accepted as the truth”
@drmodestoesq4 жыл бұрын
@@sudaissohail4851 That argument kind of falls flat. Where are the two great Mosques of Islam? They're in Saudi Arabia. And who decides a large amount of what is allowed and not allowed in Saudi Arabia? The religious clerics. And Muslims in the West say that...but those are not "real" Muslims. And those clerics spend decades of their lives studying Islam. And Iran? Who runs that country? The Ayatollahs. Who spend decades of their life studying Islam. But Muslims in the West say....They're not "real" Muslims. And Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi? A doctorate in Islamic studies. But he wasn't a "real" Muslim. By the time Muslims in the West are done...One percent of of the people who call themselves Muslims are "real" Muslims.
@alanmcnaughton36284 жыл бұрын
@@zae5pm it's ok being given a verbal booting, David is good at handing out those same verbal bootings. His special guest only about a month ago was Dr Jay Smith who's research has all but destroyed any sense of credibility from this religion of untruths, plagerisms & downright lies. The " authentic" one and only word of ALLA grew in knowledge to a total of 37 "authentic" & original korans all in the Arabic language, the earliest without vowel markings which needed experts from Germany to even be able to read. Watch Dr Wood & Dr Smith as they kick the ladder out from under this religion of peaceful lies¿ Acts 17 apologetics. D.Wood & Jay Smith. the corruption of the Quran. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gpfKh2yZg8tkrMU
@saif8716-j9b2 жыл бұрын
Very impressed . I truly appreciate all the details were given in this lecture. I loved the actual pronunciation for the words used as well in Arabic . This person definitely went through different places and different countries. Very appreciated .
@elVagabondo2 жыл бұрын
meh, its really not impressive you are just lazy and dont want to read some books to get actual knowledge
@islamisthetruewaytogod68122 жыл бұрын
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------------
@jbbolts Жыл бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812 Come back and say that after islam merges with the catholic church and the jews and the hindus and the rest of the deceivers. There is truth in everything but not everything is true
@Rtg5637 Жыл бұрын
Cursed criminal murderer profit instigated the genocide of over 300 million innocent humans and turned into desert vast fertile regions in the world.
@TS-zd2ud Жыл бұрын
Son of God does not mean that God has a child in Christianity! *what a mistake in the Qur'an!* Son of God is a title referring to the Word of God!
@rusdayatiidrus54012 жыл бұрын
He must have carried out such a thorough n rigorous study on his field. Not to mention the evidence in him that his pronunciation in Arabic is as good as his in English. Regardless the real value of his finding, this is truly inspiring n encouraging.
@chinmayshetye32 жыл бұрын
Loved the lecture! Agree with you 100% But just pronouncing "muslim" correctly is a giant leap for the west!
@basraabdulle35262 жыл бұрын
No He did do his home work now days many fake visitors come to my Country and try to study fake history and at end they lost what they want to achieve I don't why he bother to come to Saudi Arabia and next time we are making rules just the rules that non believers can't cross the free way close the our prophets grave they try to lie about him do something they like and stay away from us
@mohemmedabdul_kader89312 жыл бұрын
@mosaabtwice3999za===÷,?
@islamisthetruewaytogod68122 жыл бұрын
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------------
@shanksyagami1398 Жыл бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812 k
@eihabmunshi729710 ай бұрын
I want to hear about Islam and other religions from non apologists scholars, so I listened Prof. Fred Donner, but I found the talk oversimplified, as it’s not an expert talk. Talking about the contradictions of scripts that are more than 1400 year-old in such a shallow commentary isn’t an expert method. However, I would like to ask if you “dear friends” recommend another expert about the history of religious. I have listened to the professor rabbi Reuven Firestone and he provided great highlights on the history of Islam, Jihad doctrine…etc
@SanthoshKumar-pp7mq Жыл бұрын
24:03 actual documentation begins. 46:10 changes to Islam as we know it today.
@bangguyraj Жыл бұрын
The Indian accent lady in her question was referring prophet Muhammad as Islamic god. How terrible! From her own midset of belief, anything and everything they refer to as god!
@shriharikulkarni2305 Жыл бұрын
Yes God is in empty building of Kabba Satisfied ???
@bangguyraj Жыл бұрын
@shriharikulkarni2305 Cowdunggies don't count! Keep yourselves busy on 330 million nonsense while drunk on holy cola and high on holy dunggy!
@PhilidaFortune7 ай бұрын
Allah is just a smoke screen because muhammad came up with such a lot of revelations on his own. Like the three that umar al Khatami came up with, suddenly muhammad said it was revelation.
@bhanwarlal60907 ай бұрын
She is right. It's known to all that there is no God in the sky. If Muhammad had said that he had written all these verses himself, no one would have believed him.He fooled the people by fearing that if you do not obey him then God above will punish you😂😂Even in the age of science, poor fool people believe in Him😂
@ridvanvejzagic2887Ай бұрын
@@shriharikulkarni2305How did you come up with that?
@denisd6215 Жыл бұрын
As a muslim, I am grateful for all efforts to enlighten the truth. This is very sincere work.
@Ken-fh4jc Жыл бұрын
You aren’t going to drop a bomb are you?
@Ashish-yo8ci Жыл бұрын
@@Ken-fh4jc wtf?
@HussainFazaal Жыл бұрын
@Ken-fh4jc Well, why don't you ask the guys who dropped the largest bomb known to mankind 😊
@denisd6215 Жыл бұрын
@@Ken-fh4jc I was sincere. This work is much needed. I suggest you check Manifesto for Islamic reform - Edip Yuksel. God bless
@yohannes732 Жыл бұрын
@@Ken-fh4jcwhat’s wrong with you
@Arifftri4 жыл бұрын
feel sad for the people who waste their lives away listening to this kind of myth
@carnivalhalloween62174 жыл бұрын
So go fuck your self moron.
@albusai4 жыл бұрын
Mo Mo nice words
@worfoz4 жыл бұрын
@@carnivalhalloween6217 Ho, mo!
@Alkes7774 жыл бұрын
@@carnivalhalloween6217 Very scholarly response.
@starlordgg4 жыл бұрын
@@carnivalhalloween6217 that sounds like a typical response when a Muslim's blind faith is questioned !
@zakiuddin596910 ай бұрын
7:07 The concept of revelation often involves individuals claiming to receive messages or insights from a divine source. However, interpretation of such experiences varies widely. Some view these claims skeptically, attributing them to delusion or other psychological factors, while others accept them as genuine connections with the divine. Ultimately, how one perceives revelation depends on personal beliefs and perspectives. Some may choose to ridicule the concept, while others respect individuals' beliefs and experiences, allowing them to interpret their encounters with the divine as they see fit. Either we deny the concept or make fun of everyone.
@moazim19936 ай бұрын
I myself have had drug assisted visions of the oneness of consciousness. I’ve felt that we are somehow single cells of a greater being. Yea it can be schizophrenia or a revelation depending on how you want to view it. I was staunchly atheist, now I’m less so, but still anti organized religion. I’m not going to listen to a guy who hasn’t experienced what I experienced try to tell me what god is and what to do. You read a damn book, I’ve seen it. Who the hell is your priest or Imam or Rabbi to be an intermediary for you and god? No one at all.
@Windu19902 жыл бұрын
32 minutes in. Blatant lies. It is mentioned in the Quran that we are called muslims Surah Al Hajj 22:78. And strive for Allāh with the striving due to Him. He has chosen you and has not placed upon you in the religion any difficulty. [It is] the religion of your father, Abraham. He [i.e., Allāh] named you "Muslims" before [in former scriptures] and in this [revelation] that the Messenger may be a witness over you and you may be witnesses over the people.
@DjouherLarfi24 күн бұрын
أعتقد أنه على حق لان ليس الله من سمنا مسلمين بل ابراهيم و ابراهيم كان له قوم المسلم هوا من سلم نفسه لي الله انت لي مش فاهم اخي العزيز
@jennypai177617 сағат бұрын
Lol. Islam can't be the religion of Abraham. Islam only came about 700 AD 😂
@Windu199012 сағат бұрын
@jennypai1776 islam simply means submission. A Muslim is one who submits. All prophets submitted to God and followed this faith. Hence the religion of islam started from the first human. Prophet Adam pbuh.
@Windu199012 сағат бұрын
@@DjouherLarfi read the verse. He refers to Allah.
@abdihalimyusufmohamed89033 жыл бұрын
Don't waste your time on reading comments about his blue hair.
@gbtusa13253 жыл бұрын
better than commenting on fake prophet.
@hawamuhdin13443 жыл бұрын
@@gbtusa1325 you’re life is fake bless prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon our prophet best creation of Allah
@limitlessvoid45133 жыл бұрын
@@hawamuhdin1344 do you agree, that islam is peace? because if you do, then you don't agree with the killing of aposte. so what will you choose?
@raymollyraymolly7223 жыл бұрын
@@hawamuhdin1344 Mo was nothing but a criminal and a pedophile and all his crimes are recorded in the Muslim books the qouran and the hadeeth. Islam is an evil wicked cult and should be banned in all western and all civilised countries.
@noWoodsman Жыл бұрын
@@gbtusa1325 if you make a claim, support the claim and give evidence. There's more evidence that they have existed and have been messengers than not lol.
@aswanee4 жыл бұрын
سوف اكتب بالعربيه و يستطيع القراء الترجمه و لكن يوجد مصدرين منفصلين للتاريخ الاسلامى عن المسلمين : الأول و هو كتب السيرة - الثانى هو كتب الحديث كتب السيرة لم تهتم بفحص وتمحيص الروايات التاريخية و لكن كنت تأريخ يقوم على أسس التأريخ التقليدية التى لم تستخدم فى كتب الحديث و كتب الحديث هي الكتب التي اهتمت بجمع ما ينسب إلى محمد (صلعم) و قد وضعت لها مناهج للتدقيق و اسس على اثر ذلك ما يعرف في العلوم الإسلامية بعلم الرجال و هو سجل بسلاسل الرواة للحديث و علاقة الاتصال بين الرواة للحديث ومعرفة أحوالهم و خطوط رحلاتهم و ازمنه تواجدهم و اهتم علماء الحديث بمقايس اهمها التواتر في الحديث و هو وجود أكثر من سلسله بشريه للحديث الواحد هذه الوسائل لم يهتم المسلمون بتطبيقها على التاريخ بنفس الطريقة و لكن تم اعتماد الروايات على حالها و يمكن تنقيحها بتطبيق علم الرجال وعلم الجرح والتعديل (هما نفس الشئ) على الروايات التاريخية و لقد استمعت الى النصف ساعة الاولى من المحاضره و لم اجد ذكر لها او وجد عدم اعتراف بها او بدقه الطريقة التى جمع بها القرآن و هنا احب ان انوه انه على ما يبدو أن الباحث لم يعتمد على مصادر عربية أكثر مما اعتمد على المصادر الغربية لكى يبنى عليها ولذلك فحتى النقطة التي شاهدتها لم اجد منه معرفه او ذكر بالجهود التي بذلها المسلمون لجمع القرآن و عصمته من اى زياده او نقصان
@MrRandomEgyptian4 жыл бұрын
The sources you are referring to were written at least 200 years after mohamed's life... Watch kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3rWiXyCf8RqoK8
@mamamarianovits90294 жыл бұрын
@@MrRandomEgyptian Indeed they were, yet declared as "reliable" due to the oral tradition. However, anyone who has ever played the game "telephone" knows the accuracy of such claims.
@eissa.f4 жыл бұрын
@THE Tomahawk compiled by men? your bible you mean, yeah? hahah
@AdamAdam-kb3yhАй бұрын
هذه شحض مستشرق كاذب يدعي معرفته بطرق حفظ القران و هو اجهل خلق الله
@DangRenBo2 жыл бұрын
What was said at 20:17? The audio drops out.
@tareqkarim292611 ай бұрын
He is absolutely right, islam covered all believers in one God, every individual who believes in one God he is a Muslim, this is how Quran describes it.
@alexcampbell30329 ай бұрын
Would that definition disqualify Trinitarians?
@JMJ.5164 ай бұрын
Filthy lies is all Islam does.
@JMJ.5164 ай бұрын
@@alexcampbell3032Of course it does.
@alexcampbell30324 ай бұрын
@@JMJ.516 👍
@ridvanvejzagic2887Ай бұрын
@@JMJ.516 Many Christians don't see it that way and they argue that Christianity is monotheistic.
@shamsuddinkassim4412 жыл бұрын
For the uninitiated this is in most universities : Paper101 History of Islam. No myths discussed.
@islamisthetruewaytogod68122 жыл бұрын
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------------
@purelythemusic Жыл бұрын
Nice! Although I would like you to re-examine the concept that God is sending prophets throughout time, but then stops at Prophet Muhammed (peace be upon Him).
@FARABALE66 Жыл бұрын
Sure ! You wrote the current dogma, defined by the Abbassids. The very early arab believers were having another dogma. They were a sort of not rabbinic jews following an anti chalcedonic christianity, precisely Nasaras, arabs Nasaras. Nasara doest stand for Christian. They were nasara muhajirun who joined at Hijra, to call the Ghassanids armees to destroy the byzantium armees and take the control of Jerusalem. That is why the 1st real organisation was located in Damascus, by Muawyia 1st. Even the first shahada was not mentionning the rassul. Again, the powerful dogma came 200 years later with Al Hajjaj and Al Mamun. That dogma required to say that THE gospel was a corrupted Qur'an. But this gospel was the Diatessaron of the Nasara. There are almost 150 different gospels, and nobody pretends that they were written by god and corrupted..., only the story of one guy : Issa. Not more. The concept of chirk who defines the Massiyun, comes later as a construction of power. Nothing to do with faith. I think worth you, muminun, to revisit your dogma. You are likely cousins to us in this great story.
@hoipolloi59293 ай бұрын
@@islamisthetruewaytogod6812I have a different opinion 😊.. I think MohMad copied and pasted from Judaism and Christianity for his political economical and social ambitions. That he was not any messenger but an opportunitist who craved power and created a new religion to serve his purpose.
@CharlieSpecter4 күн бұрын
@@hoipolloi5929100% accurate
@arifabd3 жыл бұрын
Having "Bismillah" on a coin does not signify Islamic association. Most Arabs called the mighty God as "Allah".
@puppetmasternostringsonme82933 жыл бұрын
Al = god Lah = arabic moon god
@puppetmasternostringsonme82933 жыл бұрын
Mohamed father was Abdullah (Slave of al lah) before Muhammed founded Islam
@MrKobeFuentes3 жыл бұрын
@@puppetmasternostringsonme8293 dude “al” is like “the” Do you even speak arabic?
@aerisscallon97303 жыл бұрын
@@Ibn-Abdurrahman even they call it allah it is not the same god with the christian god in europe and asia..before islam is born or appeared they do not call allah the god but there are several goddes they calling including allah.al-uza .al-manat etc...
@aerisscallon97303 жыл бұрын
@@Ibn-Abdurrahman before there were no muslims before mohammad was born there are a lot of goddes in arabia they worshipp pagan idols and in those times there is no man calling allah which is only one god but they call several goddes names
@jeangatti93844 ай бұрын
There clearly is a distinction to make between the initial meaning of the coranic text (which was originally christian, though anti-trinitarian) and the meaning that was imposed (and distorted) later (9th and 10th centuries) by the abbassid caliphs (with the creation of the so-called "prophetic tradition" or "sunnah" with a multitude of hadiths, tafsir and siraa inventions). Their goal was to create a new religion serving their imperial interests of conquest and domination by the sword ... which still persists today
@solihaamir84095 жыл бұрын
At 8:30 you said God speaks Arabic it is not true we cannot attribute any language to Allah Allah reveals quran in Arabic so that we can understand it. We muslim do not have any concept of Allah how he speak. It is uncomprehansive so we do not attribute such thing to Allah
@kranithra5 жыл бұрын
its a myth similar to all the other gods where you are suppose to obey only and not to challenge. what is your religion's position about life beyond earth(extraterrestrials life) . btw you take decisions based on the visibility of moon isnt it (people have already visited moon).
@mauzouq5 жыл бұрын
tarzan what are you taking about actually decisions are made before you born (time is diminishing) so don’t think you do anything to your life god as we say or science as you say make everything
@George-iv1hi5 жыл бұрын
@@mauzouq Science destroys your islam.
@AbdiRobhani5 жыл бұрын
@@George-iv1hi Islamic tradition created scientific method
@George-iv1hi5 жыл бұрын
@@AbdiRobhani Yeah, like sun setting in murky water, very scientific method of describing reality. Your filthy islam created nothing but destruction.
@koroglurustem17223 жыл бұрын
Thanks to him for describing the arduous process of earlier hadith scholars sorting out the hadith collections.
@koroglurustem17223 жыл бұрын
@CNN is Fake News haha fake news. Go f yourself. Be little serious clown
@mcbawangyakuznouxman94393 жыл бұрын
Al Hadid of the Hades!
@samuelmorales23443 жыл бұрын
@@koroglurustem1722 he is correct. Mecca is suppose to to be Abraham's place of origin but the pilgrimage is to Jerusalem combined into one. Marwa and Safa, where do you think they are located? They are Mt. Scopus and Mt. Moriah in Jerusalem. Who puts Marwa and Safa at Jerusalem, the very names that Muslims think are mountains in Saudi Arabia? Josephus, the 1st century historian. Jahannam in the Quran is Gehenna, where the apocalypse is suppose to take place. Bakkah in the Quran is mentioned in the Bible as a rest stop to Jerusalem. Islam at it's core is based on Judeo-Christian traditions but heavily distorted by political factors where Muslims have no idea where their religion comes from. They think it came from a prophet named Muhammad but if you notice in the Quran, you get no real information about Muhammad as prophet but you come across Jesus plenty of times. The Dome of Rock inscriptions is about Jesus with no information who is MHMD as an individual but when you consider the subject matter, MHMD is most certainly Jesus. Jesus is the messenger of Allah. The Christology of Jesus matches well with Nestorian Christology that Jesus has two full natures and they are not intermixed. The historical "Islamic Muhammad" of the Arab conquests, at best, was Walid ibn Khalid, who was called Al Farooq, the Redeemer, the Savior, the one who divides between good , and bad, also known as Umar. Contemporary sources put "Islamic Muhammad" at the wrong place and at the wrong time.
@koroglurustem17223 жыл бұрын
@@samuelmorales2344 thanks for your uncooked half baked ideas, rather daydreams
@samuelmorales23443 жыл бұрын
@@koroglurustem1722 how are they half-baked? You don't make any sense. It is pretty clear that Muhammad of Islam was invented 2 centuries later. Invented with many hadiths and siras and the scholars wettled down the material to create Islam. Muhammad the miracle man in Sahih Muslim to Gnostic Muhammad who existed before Adam. The Dome of Rock is dedicated to Jesus. It tells a full narrative of Jesus the prophet. There is no Islamic Muhammad in it. There is no angel Gabriel, the caves of Hira, none of that. It is all Jesus.
@reginaldscot1654 жыл бұрын
Prof: "Sorry I'm hard of hearing, could you ask the question again louder and simplified please" Audience member: *Proceeds to ask a more complicated longer question at the same volume* 🙄
@PutItAway1013 жыл бұрын
Luckily it was just some crackpot with a loony tunes theory about volcanoes in Nicaragua, nothing of value was lost.
@luisaluisa9433 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@neoneherefrom58363 жыл бұрын
ok ur cool
@sagebias22513 жыл бұрын
Schizophrenia sure is tough.
@relaxingmindfoodandmma51083 жыл бұрын
READ DESCRIPTION UNDER MY VIDEOS AND DESTROY ISLAM IN 10 MINUTES. kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5W2q415qtangqs
@sailaway1015 Жыл бұрын
Interesting lecture, but what's with the blue hair?
@samuraijacksonooooh823010 ай бұрын
Is hairdresser is the Smurfette
@OmnipresentPotato Жыл бұрын
The reason some of the Meccans didn't want to convert is not because it means their forefathers were in Hell. Rather, it doesn't mean their forefathers are in Hell. Since they did not receive revelation, they couldn't be judged according it, so they will be judged primarily according to their deeds. Rather, the Meccans didn't like how it threatened their monopoly on the pilgramage.
@aldamierjulkarnain39353 жыл бұрын
1:00:54 - 1:01:01... was it intentionally censored? I couldn't make out what he said.. but the reaction from the moderator was interesting.
@MightyJayYoung3 жыл бұрын
he says "many of those boxes are still not opened, so we don't know what's in them"
@May3yad33 жыл бұрын
Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices ( thats the call of the prayer ) ( Athan ) Let them shout from mountaintops 42:11 that's Muslims during pilgrimage to Mecca google image ( day of Arafat ) ( Sela mountain ) mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 is in ( Madina ) city of prophet Mohamad ( Google map it ) ( kedar ) mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 that's the arabs kedar is the 2nd son of Ishmael son of Abraham you can find in genesis 25:13 Ezekiel 27:21 Arabia and all the princes of Kedar were your customers; they did business with you in lambs, rams and goats. Genesis 25:13 These are the names of the sons of Ishmael, listed in the order of their birth: Nebaioth the firstborn of Ishmael, ( Kedar ) , Adbeel, Mibsam biblehub.com/isaiah/42-11.htm Any questions My Facebook messenger is ( Eyad mayy ) or Instagram ( eyadmayy )
@thedynamicsolo4232 Жыл бұрын
You would think such a scholar would give more insight on Muhammed. Just a perusal of where he was from and how he came about the visions and book. There are known facts that give a more vilified view of the "prophet". It would be interesting and beneficial to hear more about the man and what happened via the facts, how he proceeded/progressed with his first wife and family and his leaving and his marriage to the rich widow. His shunning of her after coming to power and marrying "ayesha" at 6 years old and consummating that marriage when she was 9, according to the qur'an.
@Bluesruse Жыл бұрын
It is very hard to give that sort of insight with any kind of certainty, as most religious characters and their founders, as depicted in the various holy books of the religion itself, are typically very detached from actual real history. This applies to all "abrahamic" religions present still today.
@dr.vegetable11 ай бұрын
@@Bluesrusebiblical characters and their stories are not claimed to be literal retellings of stories as opposed to Quran and Haadiths
@Bluesruse11 ай бұрын
@@dr.vegetable Well, that depends on who you ask, and when. If you tell an average Christian, that none of the sayings or deeds of Jesus can be traced to an actual historical figure, they don't take too kind to that sort of stuff. Nor do Jews (at least the religious kind), when you tell them their exodus never _actually_ happened, nor did their Moses _actually_ even exist. So, while I agree that there's a lot more room for "human error" and "interpretation" and such, a very "literal" meaning to the stories at the core is at least to some degree present in all three.
@xpsmango414610 ай бұрын
Early age marriages is a point taken by many. In Europe in 18 century marriages in royal families of baby girls as young as 3 yrs old are recorded
@adrianagresteboy915522 күн бұрын
Your claims of Ayesha being six years old is a narration in scholars books and has nothing to do with Coran at all, there's only few event about the prophet wives in Coran without any mention of their names at all even once,and there is no mention of their marriage age in Coran at all, but there's historical book which said that Ayesha was 18 old at the first year of migration and she was married two to Three years after migration which means she was 20 old at least based on different narration,so please remove according to the Qur'an because what you claimed about the wife of prophet has nothing to do with Coran at all , they're all narration few centuries after the prophet death about 200 Year after his death at least
@sanchezuk439810 ай бұрын
Interesting lecture. Is there any significance in the blue hair?
@abumotorola96143 жыл бұрын
Regarding the nomenclature 'Muslims', the professor here fails to mention that in the Quran itself, Allah's revealed to prophet Ibrahim (peace be upon him) to coin the name for the first time. And Yes, all prophets from Adam, Nuh, Ibrahim, Ismael, Musa, Issa, Muhamad.. (peace be upon them), are all Muslims in the sense that they surrender/submission to Allah, and call people to that one same idea. As per jurisprudence, Allah the Almighty tells us that it varies from era to era, from people to people, but the sole aim is to test that one and only pillar: submission to Allah's commands.
@hhhkf3 жыл бұрын
Give me a list of Prophets who called themselves Muslims before Muhammad. None? So if Jews and Christians are Muslims, then why do your people continue to kill them?
@abumotorola96143 жыл бұрын
@@hhhkf what were Christians before Jesus (peace be upon him)? what were Jews before Moses (peace be upon him)? If you read my comment carefully, you'd realize being Muslim is about the idea not the nomenclature per se. All prophets, all of them were Muslims (submitted to Allah) and called people for the same message. Last part of your reply, I don't know if it is disingenuous or stupid or just the embodiment both.
@animarul61492 жыл бұрын
@@hhhkf hey so as a non- believer I just wanna say that even in the early Islam when human rights weren’t defined, muslims lived peacefully together with the Jews and Christians and even some Zoroastrians . Just wanted to point that out... I believe that later on in history the believers in “the book” (which are Abrahamic religions) were redefined by radicals in a way that some were considered equal to non-believers. Even now in a radical state such as the Islamic republic of Iran, religious minorities aren’t to be mistreated. It’s only convertion from Islam to anything else that can get one killed.
@hhhkf2 жыл бұрын
You are either a liar or grossly ignorant of history. Muhammad wiped out 3 Jewish tribes, millions of Hindus were murdered by invading armies.8th century - Umayyad Caliphate. Invasions led by Arab and Afghan warriors. Continued for several centuries. Most significant Invasions occurring during the 11th and 12th centuries under the Ghaznavid and Ghurid dynasties. No non-Muslim can live in peace in Pakistan without fear that they'll falsely be accused of blasphemy, their daughters kidnapped, raped, and forced into marriage. Lebanon was 80% Christian in recent times before raiding Muslims. Christians are being slaughtered like sheep in Nigeria, Sudan, etc. or taken as slaves. I vote moron.
@abumotorola96142 жыл бұрын
@@hhhkf Your YT name is Johnson, so wiping out and massacring peoples to the last woman and child is your thing: where does one begin? the Native Americas? Transatlantic slave trade? Crusades? Spanish/Portuguese Inquisition? British genocide in the subcontinent? French genocide in Algeria? Belgium genocide in the Congo? Afghanistan and Irak? ... the list goes on and on and on. Grab a history book, it'll help you sound less of an ass. However, I'd like to mention this, about Islam's treatment of Jews, since you seem unable to hide your Zionist tinge. Here is Professor David Wasserstein, a scholar of Judaism and Islam of Jewish heritage at Vanderbilt University: "Islam saved Jewry. This is an unpopular, discomforting claim in the modern world. But it is a historical truth. The argument for it is double. First, in 570 CE, when the Prophet Mohammad was born, the Jews and Judaism were on the way to oblivion. And second, the coming of Islam saved them, providing a new context in which they not only survived, but flourished, laying foundations for subsequent Jewish cultural prosperity - also in Christendom - through the medieval period into the modern world. . . . Had Islam not come along, Jewry in the west would have declined to disappearance and Jewry in the east would have become just another oriental cult."
@drabkabas2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately , there are many wrong information in this lecture . This doctor says there is no mention in Quran that Islam is a religion revealed by God , while the truth is in Quran there are clear notions that Islam is the only religion that shall be accepted by God , Quran says " whoever adopts any religion apart from Islam, it will not be accepted from him by God " . This is just only one example of this doctor inaccuracies that he posed in his lecture. I do not mind anyone to discredit Islam provided that he avoids faking up evidence . Be just objective and honest and respect people's mind . My best wishes for you anyway .
@ArbiterElegantiaee2 жыл бұрын
18:15 by the way, the conquest was possible because of the bloodiest war ever between Byzantine and Sasanid Empire right before the Arab invasion. Persia was in ruin at that moment. East Roman Empire managed to repel Arab attacks since it was about to win war against Sasanid.
@atifsyed92832 жыл бұрын
Read chapter rum chapter 30. It talks about romans(rum) and sassanids and how the defeat will happen within few years. Prophet Muhammad was the greatest leader ever BECUASE not only did he come with a message of god but he lead and was a general of an army that become the superpower.
@Timakiwala2 жыл бұрын
Green 💚 colour hair.. Islam is formed with Forces, Swords ⚔️, Bullets, Killings, means all are Converted from other religions. No self ideology,,No laws,, Only Men's are rulling,, Womens are tortured,, Womens are machines for producing 20,30, 50 childrens.. Talak TALAK Talak 3 words to destroy Women's,,, Interested in 72 HOORS with very big size Breast....Ladies have no place in society. Hum converted SUWARS Hai. Hum KALAMA Padhate hai... Huma-me JAJABA hai... Hum TALAK de sakate hai... Hum HALALA bhee karate hai(enjoyment)... 72 HOORS with big boobs for us... We can produce 20/30/50 kids , hamara Penis عضو تناسل Powerful Hai(4/6 wives)... Kya huwa, hamare bachche بچے Pancharwala Beggers Hotel worker Butcher Riksha puller hai to,, JIHADI bhee hai, inshallah....
@Achill101 Жыл бұрын
@@atifsyed9283 - Muhammad was DEAD before the armies of the believers left the Arabian peninsula, according to later Muslim historiography. True is that Eastern Rome and Sassanides had conducted long wars against each other just before the Islamic conquest.
@atifsyed9283 Жыл бұрын
@@Achill101 yes even tho he died before the great expansion but he was the power force behind uniting all of Arab tribes resulting in the power they had. For example in a saying he said verily we shall conquer Constantinople what a great leader it will be and what a great army that army will be. During his time and for the next 600-800 years it was unimaginable to even think about Constantinople but finally in 1400s it was taken. Mehmets motivating cause was this saying hence you will find this saying on a plaque in Istanbul hagia sofia. Peace be with you.
@atifsyed9283 Жыл бұрын
@@Achill101 also yes even tho they had become weak but what’s amazing is what I had mentioned in my original comment. Chapter rum (30) it says Roman’s have been defeated in nearby land but within 3-9 years they will triumph and exactly that happened Roman’s relapsed and took triumph. I’m not arguing with you. I’m just presenting you the truth. Behind Islam. Read it with passion and honesty and you’ll see it’s not a enemy religion but the truth.
@kenzeier2943Ай бұрын
The scholars study topics and their study is so dissociated with spirituality. We know that none of these professors dare say anything critical of Islam. We know of all the death threats against anyone who dares to challenge the narrative. It is shocking that the land of Luther is now funding such a shocking religion as Islam which is contradictory to the Bible, the word of God.
@GizmoFromPizmo3 жыл бұрын
The presenter sounds a LOT like Bob Newheart. He even has the same cadence.
@robdoubleyou49183 жыл бұрын
Haha...I just left he same comment!
@TruthSetFree-zm1ep3 жыл бұрын
Yup
@vi683a3 жыл бұрын
I was listening outside before the Video Started and had to come inside and see who the speaker was lol.
@SnapCracklePapa3 жыл бұрын
That's it!
@scottsearer62013 жыл бұрын
I was just thinking of that uncanny resemblance...checked Wikipedia and good Bob is from Illinois...Professor Donner was born in DC and grew up in NJ...Perhaps people in Chicago are still watching the reruns......
@xsuploader3 жыл бұрын
Such a thought provoking talk and all people can talk about is his hair.
@relaxingmindfoodandmma51083 жыл бұрын
READ DESCRIPTION UNDER MY VIDEOS AND DESTROY ISLAM IN 10 MINUTES. kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5W2q415qtangqs
@alexbaro3 жыл бұрын
Hardly thought provoking. I fell asleep while paying attention.
@xsuploader3 жыл бұрын
@@alexbaro maybe not for you then. Different strokes for different folks.
@alexbaro3 жыл бұрын
@@xsuploader More like different IQs.
@kaisersoze81993 жыл бұрын
Complete bs. I'm 20 minutes in and absolutely zero references or sources so far. I'm just staying for the blue hair and his hilarious attempt at revisionism. .
@wilsonkorisawa70263 жыл бұрын
First I thought that his blue hair was cause by damaged pixels on my screen...Maybe he is an Avatar .
@user-qx8op7pn1o3 жыл бұрын
Me too lol
@tanerkaplankiran Жыл бұрын
8:18 'god speak arabic' is a low joke. Would Italian make things more legit? And what's with the paintball headshot?
@Lic51 Жыл бұрын
Every time a Muslim tells me I can't visit Mecca because I'm Christian, I keep asking them why Abraham said he built the Kabba for the "whole of humanity". The answer of those Muslims who are a bit more instructed is that passage of the Quran that says that "idolaters" and non-believers can't go there. Again, I believe in God as this scholar explained, there wasn't such a strong division at the beginning of "Islam"
@mohamadalibrahim2583 Жыл бұрын
Some apparent wisdoms 1- In order to show the pride and holiness of this place and distinguishing it from other places. It is the purest spot on the face of the earth and the qibla of Muslims from all over the world, when they pray for Allah. So Allah designated her for this. 2- Every country and every place has its own laws and rules that people must adhere to. By the way, these rules are made by humans. Why is it not permissible to set special conditions for this place, not from humans but from the Lord of humans?! 3- Because of the sanctity of this place and its status before God and among Muslims and being considered as the source and first center of Islam, non-Muslims, including infidels, Christians, etc., were prevented from entering it because they are not considered worthy of entering such a holy mosque, because polytheism and disbelief are moral impurity like physical impurity of the body. 4-There is also another reason, which is just a security precaution, so that they do not tamper with it or try to corrupt it in any way. Believers in islamic definition are just those, who follow the message of the prophet Mohammad(PBUH) and accept just Allah as the only one God who is worship worthy. for this reason, it is not sufficient to belive at something(or call yourself believer) to be able to visit Makka. It is only for muslims Hopefully this answers some of your questions about that. Best regards
@KD400_ Жыл бұрын
Because u need to recite the declaration of faith. Ur a woman aswell which means u would need a male companion with u. U think its restrictive for men it's also restrictive for women too. That's just how they do things over there respect it
@JamesAgans Жыл бұрын
In the beginning he said that the kabba was built by pagans, did he not ? This story sounds a lot like the Joseph Smith story and the golden plates that he buried, but were never found because, as he says they were taken by the angel Moroni. It is so obvious to me that any religion that is exclusive to some humans is fabricated by another human, especially those that consider themselves to be "chosen" as if a creator of the universe would exclude one group of people, and favor another. Of course, if you are writing the book, you are going to make your tribe the "chosen" one.
@JamesAgans Жыл бұрын
@@mohamadalibrahim2583in the beginning he said that the kabba was built by Pagans, then usurped by the Muslims did you miss that, or did I not hear him correctly?
@amineyarabialamine1477 Жыл бұрын
The whole idea behind it is that mecca is built arround the kaaba and what's the purpose of visiting the kaaba if you don't beleive in Islam in the first place. But beleive me the prophet mohamed prophesided that one day the kaaba will be a an archeological cite where all religions will be coming to visit it just like ppl take selfies with the statute of liberty or the eiffel tower so dont worry if your into sightseeing you will sure visit it I am muslim and beleive that the real kaaba is one's heart the stone kaaba is just the visual archetype
@RadAl-1233 жыл бұрын
1400 years ago, all south Arabia, including Hijaz and Aseer mountains, present Oman belong to Yemen, weather patterns were of more rain...Petra and this area between Iraq and Petra Also, had more rain..
@ashekaili13 жыл бұрын
Yemen is a modern name and climate is similar to current one , what you said is false
@-o-light88633 жыл бұрын
I never hear of Yemen in antiquity must be a dream or nightmare you is on
@paulgarrett74463 жыл бұрын
Very interesting but, does he really still believe Muhammad and Islam were born in Mecca? Mecca didn't exist in the 6th or 7th centuries, is not present on any maps of that time and is hundreds of miles from major trade routes. Muhammad was born 27km from Petra; Islam began in Petra. All early mosques have their qiblas pointing towards Petra, including the Canton mosque, thousands of miles away.
@cmsacademy16733 жыл бұрын
Nobody takes that seriously and the research is pathetic at best.
@beautiful71523 жыл бұрын
@@cmsacademy1673 The old qiblah was Palestine aqsa masjid Read more before you judge about to Islam
@cmsacademy16733 жыл бұрын
@@beautiful7152 I think you did not read my comments at all. Everybody knows the first quibla was al alqsa but not Petra
@madinaman3 жыл бұрын
The new finding that Muhammad was born & raised in Rome. And, later Vatican took it over. It seems, muslims need to take Rome back.
@rustyray4203 жыл бұрын
Meccas been around for centuries. Ancient greeks and romans knew about it, they didnt even dare to enter mecca because of its hostile and harsh environment. The other name for Mecca is Becca/Bacca which is well documented in history
@blankasahami2470 Жыл бұрын
Why don't you use the actual text from the Quran? It states that the Quran was written by the noble scribes on the parchment paper. So it was written at the time of Muhammmad's life.
@johnaweiss3 жыл бұрын
1:02:21 "I am told"? Hearsay isn't legitimate research.
@Ali-tz5xc3 жыл бұрын
He didn't claim to be legitimate. He just said what he is told.
@Three_Sevens3 жыл бұрын
Told by muslims... that's the context
@nostradamus5223 жыл бұрын
@@Three_Sevens By Muslims ? 😂😂😂 Or was he in Vatikan Streets ( not State ) with his research. Without sources, think this make a Lot of Sense, like his Blue in the hairs, like the rest - a caricature of a Men. I think he confused research with the search for peace 😂😂😂
@Omantube Жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if the Professor follows any believe system and that's not really my concern but, in a nutshell, he's not a scholar of neither Islam or Qur'an. Quite stylish though with that partial blueish hair dye :-
@davidgray33213 жыл бұрын
It is so predictable and disappointing that the “sales pitch” for theology always seems to be “convert or we will murder you, any objections? Fine your a member of our belief system” it rather puts me off. And the Muslim faith, to me as an outsider, seems particularly aggressive in this regard, since this approach is still the case today in certain countries. It is a shame people have to live under this way of life.
@FlyingSpaghettiMonster20003 жыл бұрын
And of course everyone is born into the religion, meaning that they would be guilty of apostasy if they left, and potentially killed as a result. You'd have to be very brave to leave Islam considering the risks.
@CRUISERJ13 жыл бұрын
You bring up a very valid point. It is my understanding that an all Loving God would not wish to have anyone be forced into a belief. Its very much the same thing as pointed out by Frank Turek a well known Apologetic for the Christian faith who uses the analogy of a woman who rejects the advances of a man who is an admirer from afar. We all know what happens when a man approaches a woman who simply is not interested in a relationship. The question is asked; how can you force someone to Love you? By definition of Love as in the Greek context of agape Love, we see as the reciprocal love between God and humans is made manifest in one's unselfish love of others. The list of attributes to consider; To Listen. respect differences. ask his opinion. be honest if there is a problem. pray for their spiritual growth. don't make assumptions. don't grumble about them behind their backs. In essence a Love that puts others before oneself. It makes little or no sense to force Love upon anyone. Love in my understanding is one in the same ,synonymous with an ultimate Truth. So to boil everything down to its pure essence by virtue with all due respects searching for the Ultimate Truth in Faith, why would our creator give us in his loving Grace , "Free will", the ability to choose on one hand , and then take away that gift by forcing us to Love him? It makes no sense. Jesus said he came to heal the broken hearted not condemn them. Jesus was not a fan of man made religions and pointed to the hypocrisies . " They crush people with unbearable religious demands and never lift a finger to ease the burden. "Matthew 23:4.
@MT-ub8qg3 жыл бұрын
This line of thinking is only held by extremists and smug secularists that claim to understand theology while mocking what they are unable to comprehend.
@FlyingSpaghettiMonster20003 жыл бұрын
@@MT-ub8qg which theism are they unable to comprehend? This speaker is a historian, and Islam quite clearly documents the penalty for apostasy. Christianity too spread through violence or forced conversion.
@ihabhatim58253 жыл бұрын
I don't think you know what theology means buddy
@lamontcranston31772 жыл бұрын
I don't get it. This man clearly has a very bright blue streak in his hair; yet I see no mention of this strange fact in the description or comments. Have I been asleep? Do old conservative scholars now streak their white hair with electric-blue?! Where are his piercings and tattoos? Wait. I don't want to know.
@ChillAssTurtle2 жыл бұрын
When youre a million hears old you just do stuff for the lols
@786humaira15 жыл бұрын
Questioner questioning about Jizzya. So simple all citizens have to give tax. Muslims give tax it is called zakat, non Muslims in a Muslim countries of those days paid taxes named jizzya. Historians have said many a times the amount of zakat was much more than the Jizzya.
@Cecilia-ky3uw3 жыл бұрын
it depends but more or less jizya was probably more costly than the zakat in general
@FF-ch9nr2 жыл бұрын
depends on the ruler/empire. In practice there wasn’t a standard for tax for all Islamic empires. Even the same empire had fluctuations based on the economic conditions of a given time. The ottomans infamously had considerably higher Jizya than zakat
@gow2ilove3 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. Unfortunately the audience questions were pretty terrible and they didn't understand the concept of keeping things brief...
@connorlancaster75412 жыл бұрын
Hello do you believe in Jesus?
@gow2ilove2 жыл бұрын
@@connorlancaster7541 well he definitely existed if that's what you mean by "believe"
@wanitagutierrez77482 жыл бұрын
Boring lecture people should read fit themselves the Quran and not let others tell what it say. Do not be deceived said Christ.
@connorlancaster75412 жыл бұрын
@@gow2ilove Do you believe he rose from the dead?
@Hannestv46072 жыл бұрын
*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!* To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!
@abumotorola96143 жыл бұрын
Jewish tribes in Madinah were treated according to the way they behaved in war situations. That treatment falls under 3 categories: the one you mention (the harshest) was because they reneged on the war pact they had with Muslims. So, once the Muslim army went out of Madinah to face the attacking armies, that particular Jewish tribe (who stayed behind because as dhimmis, they are defended by Muslim army and hence don't have the obligation to do so) attacked defenceless Muslims (women and children) and had to be punished accordingly. The rights of non Muslims, Jews and non Jews, were granted according to Shariah in the Sahifah of Madinah (the first constitution ever drafted). Lazy clichés will never cut it, professor.
@Cecilia-ky3uw3 жыл бұрын
good lord my dude stop introducing theology to history the worldwide flood didnt happen and its not historical, adam and eve never existed that is theology
@abumotorola96143 жыл бұрын
@@Cecilia-ky3uw I iz not ur dude, sorry
@watchman4today283 жыл бұрын
And then we've found out that that it didn't really begin anywhere near mecca or Medina but somewhere 600 miles further north.
@OG-Malinali3 жыл бұрын
Thanks to Cira international
@nunyabeeswax94633 жыл бұрын
Geography, Archeology and lingustics will be ruin of Islam. Keep saying what your saying
@mcbawangyakuznouxman94393 жыл бұрын
That is why brown dot M & M was created! ( Meca & Medine )
@durhamgrigg3125 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this most helpful and insightful lecture by someone who clearly has approached matters from the genuine research efforts to find historical truth! Much appreciated . More please.
@CorePathway Жыл бұрын
I haven’t watched it yet, but it seems to me that a large population wanted their own hero instead of worshipping another.
@muhammadeisa1459 Жыл бұрын
@@CorePathway what?
@CorePathway Жыл бұрын
@@muhammadeisa1459 People must be able to closely relate to a Prophet to use them to find God. When Europeans co-opted Jesus and made their iconography into their ideal: blond haired blue eyes fair skinned, the Prophet Muhammad grew from the same Abrahamic roots to appeal to a different population, one who had the background and traditions to appeal to a different population. I believe there have been many Prophet and saints. Zoroaster, Krishna, Gilgamesh, and countless others lost to time. God did not ignore the peoples of Asia, South America, Indonesia, China, Russia for millennia. He appeared to them and through their prophets and saints. The Baghavad Gita specifically explains how it’s easier for people to connect with an incarnation of Divinity than it is to worship the Oneness, the Unity of everything. For the peoples of the Middle East the Prophet Muhammad is that incarnation of Divinity. That’s what my belief and opinion is.
@rocksparadox Жыл бұрын
@@muhammadeisa1459 ''WHAT?'' Islam is a cheap rip off from the existing monotheisms, M0h4mm3d was an obvious liar, rapist, thief and murderer if you read the texts.
@formxshape Жыл бұрын
All these mainstream religions come from a time when scientific understanding was so poor that for example ‘witches’ were burned alive for causing hail storms, and people were possessed with the devil when in reality they were suffering from epilepsy. So… let’s take all these religious with a humongous pinch of salt shall we. Admitting there is no god, examining evolutionary biology, comprehending the vastness and coldness of the universe, understanding how long it took life to evolve (millions of years, millions and millions of years) facing your fears and the harsh cold realities that life is a fluke - is the true enlightenment, rather than burying your head in sand with religions.
@GratifyMeNow132 жыл бұрын
It is interesting that the earliest Neolithic sites are concerned about the passage of time as accurately as possible because they were tied to the earliest civilisations founded around agriculture but the Muslim calendar is based on the lunar year which is the least accurate. They didn’t need to be accurate because the Arabs were traders not agriculturalists. This is a fundamental weakness in a universal religion at a time when the solar calendar was well known and accepted as far more accurate needing the fewest conversions or additions and subtractions to work out what time of year it was.
@SamuraiKage-iv3ow2 жыл бұрын
Here is a fact: The lunar calendar (Islamic Hijri) shifts 11 days against the solar calendar (Gregorian). A religious reason for selecting the lunar calendar is to have equity in religious practices. For example fastting the month of Ramadan would not be fixed to a particular season but rather year after year, throughout the world, the month of fasting will shift by 11 days and in 36 year a person would have fasted throughout all the seasons. Furthermore, who stated that the lunar calendar isn't accurate?
@mspaint93 Жыл бұрын
@@SamuraiKage-iv3ow Least accurate, not wholy innacurate. It doesn't account for a complete rotation of the earth around the sun, which measures our days and seasons and everything else, hence a solar calender is more reliable. The lunar calendar functionally just measures the moon. This is also not very useful for modern computing systems. A solar calender still isn't perfectly accurate in regards to intergers in measuring the true nature of time (a year being 365.2472 days), but it still requires far less unintuitive interference (just one day every 4 years) than the lunar calender matching the moon. Essentially, the only pro of a lunar calender is literally just for Islamic spiritual purposes, but in every other metric solar calenders are more accurate and convieniant.
@shqiptariidukagjinit5650 Жыл бұрын
What makes a calendar accurate and inaccurate? Do you think the Lunar Calendar is inaccurate because it doesn’t equate to the Solar Calendar? The only reason why your calendar has 365 days is because you chose to base a year off the revolution of the Earth around the sun. A year does not have to be based off one revolution. I can base a year off the moon, the stars, the seasons, and whatever I wanted to. The Islamic calendar was a new calendar created specifically for the Muslims, not for agriculture.
@pileci-batak Жыл бұрын
@@shqiptariidukagjinit5650There isn't such a thing as the year of the moon, as the Earth isn't revolving around the Moon. On the other hand, solar year is basically the time it takes the Earth to orbit the Sun. Also, the islamic calendar wasn't created for Muslims, and it was used long before Muhammad was born. We don't have many sources for that, but it's only reasonable to conclude as we know (from the traditional narrative of hadith) that preIslamic Meccans had four sacred months and we do have the names of the months
@shqiptariidukagjinit5650 Жыл бұрын
@@pileci-batak you did not understand. There is no lunar calendar FOR YOU. The only reason why you follow a solar calendar is because your people chose to base a year off of the sun. And I’m not saying the lunar calendar was made by Muslims for Muslims, but the Islamic calendar, which was based off a lunar calendar, was made for Muslims.
@sadragholami508010 ай бұрын
While thanking, it is appropriate for them to debate with a first-class Islamic thinker. There are important words against some of his claims.
@homeboysudaka56293 жыл бұрын
Being sarcastic when speaking about any religious prophet or idol is very disrespectful And this guy explanation of Islam is kindergarten level
@mercster5 жыл бұрын
Why does this perfectly reasonable and scholarly gentleman have a shock of blue hair? I know most of the comments seem to be about this, but I think it's an important question!
@amazingbibleantiquities72215 жыл бұрын
The blue hair definitely DISTRACTS from the credibility of his lecture. 🤔
@sim.frischh97815 жыл бұрын
His granddaughter played with the hair and got it blue, according to some comments.
@gloryofthemessiah87715 жыл бұрын
I think that it's the fashion these days
@seansoblixe97114 жыл бұрын
important to a man child
@mercster4 жыл бұрын
@@seansoblixe9711 Actually, only a child would dye their hair like that. I'm sure in your "community" it's pretty common.
@tammuz80 Жыл бұрын
This made me happy and confirmed some thoughts I had about my religion. Thank you for such treasure working. How I can follow your studies?
@ldahmy Жыл бұрын
U should be wary tho. Cause he clearly get stuff wrong like saying "Muslims fight each other all the time" and that's a bit hyperbolic. And the word Islam as a religion didn't exist when in the quran there's a verse that says : the religion to Allah is Islam.
@mahbubellahi9191 Жыл бұрын
@@ldahmyi think we shouldn't be harshly judging his studies because,this man i studying old stuff without a bias. So he is only speaking on the basis of his study, so let him study. And his study isnt about preaching islam so we dont need to follow that. And the party of him saying muslims fight eachother all time , is true. Although we believe in the same religion, we argue on the basis of madhabs/ sects and a lot of stuff. There are sects which are even banned from Saudi Arabia, because they have concepts that are so messed up that, normally they aren't even muslims anymore. You also have shias who have scholars who even discard hadiths and even claim adulteration of the Quran. Iam not sure about the term islam ,coz i have never studied that( as its too small of a matter to give importance), so i will study on that too.
@Speedfighter313 Жыл бұрын
@@mahbubellahi9191 I appreciate your answer here but I think to say that other sects are so "messed up" is the whole basis he is trying to explain here, all he is saying is that we have been fed one sided and biased narratives that have changed so much since the life of our prohpet that muslims are blindly accepting hadith and history that may not be true at all, for example the term Muslim and Islam were also mentioned in the early covenants of the jews and christians....we can't accept hadith in the same manner as the Quran. Hadith even when completely 'sahih' has been narrated in almost a chinese whisper methodology and when comparing two same narrations by different narrators it's clear to see there was no consensus on some key information between the narrators, just proving the point that Hadith is a good foundation but should not be used to narrate history from a historians pov due to the sheer biases. You aren't to know which sect is really messed up and which is truly on the right path from these hadith as they are subjective. JaazakAllah
@joro-2024-p9w Жыл бұрын
@@ldahmy "And the word Islam as a religion didn't exist when in the quran there's a verse that says : the religion to Allah is Islam." إن الـديـن عـنـد الله الإسـلام That presupposes that din means religion and islam means Islam as we understand it today as a religion. islam could also be a practice: to submit to Allah. What exactly does dín mean? Does it connote a fixed set of rules and a historical community that adheres to it? How then can both Muhammad and Ibrahim be Muslims, when they lived in separate time periods? Is dín then a certain way of behaving, a way? Then you could translate as: The way with God is submitting (unto him).
@reachedcertainty Жыл бұрын
@@joro-2024-p9w actually in Surah 22:78 we are named as "Muslims" literally "Strive for ˹the cause of˺ Allah in the way He deserves, for ˹it is˺ He ˹Who˺ has chosen you, and laid upon you no hardship in the religion-the way of your forefather Abraham. Who named you 'Muslims' ˹in the˺ earlier ˹Scriptures˺ and in this ˹Quran˺, so that the Messenger may be a witness over you, and that you may be witnesses over humanity. So establish prayer, pay alms-tax, and hold fast to Allah. He ˹alone˺ is your Guardian. What an excellent Guardian, and what an excellent Helper!"
@dreamsbyte10 күн бұрын
In a mostly peaceable way. Why would anyone assume that? That's like thinking the Old Testament wasn't brutal.
@Warriorofight4 жыл бұрын
I am ok that he challenges the traditional view as a historian. However, when he tried to explain the terms Islam,Momin &Muslim, he lost me. This guy doesn’t have depth. Easy to ask lot of questions but no answers.
@Warriorofight4 жыл бұрын
Actually what they are ‘discovering’ in 20th century was already discussed in our books hundred of years. There is no different versions, only Qiraat. Variations are normally enhancing the meanings and is beauty of Quran. Remember there are unbroken chain of narration of oral memorization of Quran from Prophet Pbuh. Jay Smith and his party either do not speak Basic Arabic or have no knowledge of Classical Arabic. They try to educate Muslims when even these concepts are widely known and not even slightly controversial among any sect of Muslims. Please do not blindly trust any of these ‘Scholars’ but do your research. May Allah guide us all. I rest my case.
@bunnystrasse3 жыл бұрын
@@Warriorofight hmmm have you watched Acts17 Apologetics?
@Cecilia-ky3uw3 жыл бұрын
@@bunnystrasse hes biased as a christian my dude plus the bible is pretty much as criticisable
@Cecilia-ky3uw3 жыл бұрын
he has depth my dude hes the guy who developed a plausible alternate theory accepted as plausible
@granthurlburt40623 жыл бұрын
@@Cecilia-ky3uw There is absolutely no doubt he takes a similar rational view of the roots of Xtianity. Both Islam and Xtianity are made up by pre-scientific humans.
@mon7109 Жыл бұрын
I recommend him to read surah maidah 5:3 it clearly states what the name of our religion is. The quantity of how many times mumeen is mentioned doesnt make it the name of the religion. Mohammed pbuh is mentioned only 5 times. Still we consider him the most important prophet. This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion. But if any is forced by hunger, with no inclination to transgression, Allah is indeed Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
@esfanintan4 жыл бұрын
Quran is in Arabic because Mohammad spoke Arabic, the same way God spoke to Moses in Hebrew.
@starlordgg4 жыл бұрын
if there was truely a god, he would have revealed the exact same thing at the exact same time to people of different nations and languages. Now that would be true God like miracle.
@AbiNomac4 жыл бұрын
Jalil Morshedi - Rubbish. According to Islam Arabic is Gods language. Its funny because Arabic isnt even Islam’s language although Muslims claim it to be there’s. It is the language of the Christian Arabs long before the cult of Islam came along.
@esfanintan4 жыл бұрын
@@AbiNomac "According to Islam"? what is that mean, you need to provide a better reference like the Quran itself or some other official Islamic documents. Arabic is the language of people who live in Arabia whether Christian, Jews, and others. Again, each religious book is written in the language that its profit spoke and since Mohammad naturally spoke Arabic because he lived in Arabia the Quran is naturally in Arabic.
@brianwhite49744 жыл бұрын
@@starlordgg What has blinded you, why can't you see through the creation of the heavens and this earth they are all in need of a Creator. What sustains His creation and the systems in your body, the ecology, and the laws organizing the heavens as they expand. Take your blinders off He is near.
@sunset2.004 жыл бұрын
probably not every nation has its language
@rossscalise610011 ай бұрын
Forgot to mention that his uncle was a scriptures translator, into Arabic, Muhammed was illiterate and a few of the texts in the Qur'an are pure copies of alternate scripture and new testament texts which were not part of original cannon. These are key points.
@alastair41511 күн бұрын
Source for this claim?
@mmmabo30944 жыл бұрын
although i was raised muslim i have always had a thought that early islam was part of Nestorianism .
@burhanakbar13634 жыл бұрын
yes in early islam influence from buhaira, and warraqa ibn naufal is big role for prophet
@stellawilliamoldvideosofch38564 жыл бұрын
@Horrace Smith what about muhmd who was bewitched and controlled by satan according to kuran
@musicabs46754 жыл бұрын
So many stuipd people here like wake up and read about this religon insted of saying nonsence, i read about it and nothing like that is in islam
@stellawilliamoldvideosofch38564 жыл бұрын
@Horrace Smith but he was not bewitched and controlled like by satan Like your child rapist pedophilia muhmd, how satan controlled your muhmd , maybe your 2 right hands allah was on vacations or satan and was doing gym and become more powerful
@stellawilliamoldvideosofch38564 жыл бұрын
@Horrace Smith you have most funny foolish fairy tales cult in the world, haha,what about your angel squeezing your child rapist muhmd to read but he is saying i cant , haha that was most foolish story , a man come in cave and start squeezing other man and other man instead of asking him who are you , saying i cant , then what was use of squeezing , why your allah command was so weak that muhmd never read , believe me if jesus said to donkey to read , he will read
@tabascoindy5005 Жыл бұрын
Im a true born muslim & this dude speaks way better than any muslim scholar out there.
@reefmohammed3553 Жыл бұрын
You're a hypocrite the true dajjal followers
@sh230968 Жыл бұрын
Dude's cool with streak of blue hair. Isn't he?
@rayparker83524 ай бұрын
Are you smoking pot?
@WAHRHEIT4023 жыл бұрын
8:00 God knows all languages as god is allknowing you .... But this was the miracle for his tribe to challenge them though mohammed was an illiterate ... Educate your self ...👍
@lxlii71343 жыл бұрын
@A K his marriages were all ordered by God and he obeyed; except for his first marraige to Khadija whom he chose by himself as any man chooses his wife. He didnt marry another during her lifetime, untill she died. Peace be upon them both. Just a word of advice to you: know someone’s life to know his actions and choices, unbiasedly, then speak about him and judge him!
@WAHRHEIT4023 жыл бұрын
@A K Don't you hear about girls 9 and even 8 years old becoming mothers 🙃 or who teaches and breaches hatered to you didn't tell you that ... Or didn't you see in news france giving contraceptive pills to teenagers aged 12 and 13 and even younger!?🙃 ..Does a kid need a contraceptive ??? ... You just need to be fair and not biased to hatered ... What is this kind of faith do you have that teaches you criticizing and talking this bad way to others !? If you think your faith is good you should prove it through your conversations and while talking with others ...
@shooshcatlover95093 жыл бұрын
I didn’t like his joke nor found it funny
@davidcrenshawphysicaltherapy12 күн бұрын
As a Baha’i, the Baha’i writings ask Baha’is to learn about Islam from non-biased sources. I find academic sources to be helpful. Thanks.
@muhammadalihindi4113 жыл бұрын
The reliability of the narrators are taken into the account. if there's any old document which question the reliability of the character or moral conduct of the narrator then, that narrator is classed as weak and all the narration chains his name is mentioned will also be classed as weak. The authentic hadith make sure, the references about the narrator are sound, references are well documented by other expert well known scholars. well if we question this then this is the same principle use to authenticate any historical events. I think the hadith authentication mechanism is second to none.
@Dude408f3 жыл бұрын
The issue seems to be that even with that high standard it seems the Hadith are unreliable and that has been know since centuries ago...
@Cecilia-ky3uw3 жыл бұрын
the moral conduct of the character does not in any way affect the truth of his writings we should not dismiss people for their alleged misdoings
@user-el6xm2pk7x3 жыл бұрын
That is a ridiculous argument So if the guy is a well known liar do you believe them 😂😂😂
@noWoodsman Жыл бұрын
@@Dude408f if you think hadiths are weak just because they are old nothing in this universe is true and even when you open your eyes it's all fake, you don't exist now it's just a dream lmao.
@Dude408f Жыл бұрын
@@noWoodsman It seems you misunderstood my comment. Anyway, your idea is interesting, thank you
@danielcrane48474 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed your video, full of great info BUT, WTF is up with the BLUE hair bro?
@GospelOfTimothy3 жыл бұрын
If you want fools to believe what you say you have to dye your hair blue first.
@highoctanestraighttalk78063 жыл бұрын
Interesting how he cited John of Damascus but not John's critique of Islam
@dougcortes65672 жыл бұрын
The critique is not the point. The point is the historical reference. He is not looking to approve or disprove of the religion, rather to seek evidence of how it was formed and practiced in it’s earliest days.
@rusi62192 жыл бұрын
His "critique" is a sub-daycare level essay.
@kennyg1358 Жыл бұрын
@@rusi6219 looking forward to reading your work....
@markcasebier4 жыл бұрын
As with Christian documentary evidence, early dates are suspect. Hard evidence is sparse for the first several centuries. Most of what is accepted are tradition. Tradition is analogous to legendary. Judaism has many of the same troubles.
@husnainkhalil25543 жыл бұрын
Except that there is a very well documented, compared to other religions, tradition which sought to preserve scientifically the history. The hadith are taken from narrators with at times only 3 generations, there are also methods to authenticate the sources.
@johnfrancis56733 жыл бұрын
@@husnainkhalil2554 yeah like the breast feeding for adults 10 x times & stoning for adultery, that a goat ate (a goat ate gods word!) when muhammads child bride (married at 6 yrs old) was tending to muhammads dead bosy. islam is painfuly false, sex & death cult you was born into.
@husnainkhalil25543 жыл бұрын
@@johnfrancis5673 the milk was drunk drunk from a cup, nor was it understood to be a general rule, that was a specific situation. At least know what you're talking about. As for stoning for adultery, putting aside that it is a hudud punishment, this says nothing about Islam being false. Make an actual argument. As for the eating of the verse, this is narrated only in one instance of the hadith with a weak narrator in the chain and has been traditionally rejected as weak. Authentic versions of this hadith without this addition exist. Go get some actual arguments, you just made random points. And make sure you actually know what you're talking about.
@YaakovEzraAmiChiАй бұрын
😂no not at all. There’s a lot of literature and actual evidence. It’s only that the Arabs were not writing anything down
@brianregan50532 жыл бұрын
Where and when did the current Islamic characteristics of religious murder and sadism arise?
@anotherdayonearth21992 жыл бұрын
From the beginning.
@belalaloul37275 ай бұрын
Wahhabism fueled by saudi oil money for power and control
@belalaloul37275 ай бұрын
started before saudi was a country yes, but definitely since oil was found, it was literally putting gas on that fire. however I believe the khalifa, can't remember which one but not long after the prophet death approx 40-50 years the teachings changed. just like jesus message and previous prophets
@tulpas933 ай бұрын
Started with the Qur'an. Read (or listen to) it! It doesn't take that long and millions of people on the planet you live on organize their lives around it. Good health to you!
@ARA-cz2ii2 ай бұрын
Islam was a scam against Jewish and Christianity.
@solomonroasthead7914 Жыл бұрын
An-Nahl 16:24-24 (24) وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُم مَّاذَآ أَنزَلَ رَبُّكُمْۙ قَالُوٓا۟ أَسَٰطِيرُ ٱلْأَوَّلِينَ English - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran (24) And when it is said to them, “What has your Lord revealed?” They say, “Ancient fables!” French - Muhammad Hamidullah (24) Et lorsqu'on leur dit: «Qu'est-ce que votre Seigneur a fait descendre?» Ils disent: «Des légendes anciennes!»
@4255Mizan4 жыл бұрын
@Joels310. One can always tell when one has a weak argument. Those with a weak argument begin to insult and disparage their opponent. Name calling and bashing is always telling about the speaker than the one spoken of. We thoroughly understand what is trying being conveyed. For the intelligent and fair-minded, the ploy doesn't work. The first rule we learn: Speak not about that which you do not know. Google and picking up rhetoric doesn't qualify as scholarly.
@fearnoman58624 жыл бұрын
Correct yes. One can expect these kind of 'scholars' in the end times. People of the anti Christ trying to gather some steam against Islam (many also toppling Christianity). Satans pride wont allow him to enter hell alone!
@stellawilliamoldvideosofch38564 жыл бұрын
@@fearnoman5862 haha, your child rapist pedophilia muhmd was bewitched and controlled by satan according to kuran , what you want more
@yus33444 жыл бұрын
Stella William not befitting someone who calls herself a christian
@stellawilliamoldvideosofch38564 жыл бұрын
@@yus3344 better then following a child rapist pedophilia bewitched muhmd
@yus33444 жыл бұрын
Well Stella you can swear and mock and jeer but you would not lessen the status of the greatest person to walk on this earth . You are just wasting your remaining time on this earth trying to belittle someone who has over a billion followers As the saying goes if you can't beat them then join them
@VJolie33 жыл бұрын
smh, when they opened the floor for questions they specifically said "please ask a question no lectures" and the first guy starts lecturing smfh
@May3yad33 жыл бұрын
Isaiah 42:11 Let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices ( thats the call of the prayer ) ( Athan ) Let them shout from mountaintops 42:11 that's Muslims during pilgrimage to Mecca google image ( day of Arafat ) ( Sela mountain ) mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 is in ( Madina ) city of prophet Mohamad ( Google map it ) ( kedar ) mentioned in Isaiah 42:11 that's the arabs kedar is the 2nd son of Ishmael son of Abraham you can find in genesis 25:13 Ezekiel 27:21 Arabia and all the princes of Kedar were your customers; they did business with you in lambs, rams and goats. Genesis 25:13 These are the names of the sons of Ishmael, listed in the order of their birth: Nebaioth the firstborn of Ishmael, ( Kedar ) , Adbeel, Mibsam biblehub.com/isaiah/42-11.htm Any questions My Facebook messenger is ( Eyad mayy ) or Instagram ( eyadmayy )
@ABel-oi5kv Жыл бұрын
That brief joke the gentelman made about God speaking Arabic ...Tells me he is not familiar with the Arabic Language . الجعل ،والانزال جعل ونزل Two verbs describing the event of turning the message into an understandable Arabic language from a prior (different ) formula.
@harukrentz43517 күн бұрын
There should be studies about women's role in the early years of islam. This is important to tackle the gross misogynistic issue in islam.
@thomasjust26634 жыл бұрын
Islam borrowed many elements from other religions, including pagan rituals
@gandalfthegrey25924 жыл бұрын
No it didn't borrow anything. The way you guys try to enforce Secular thoughts into things forcefully is just so weird.
@wowmyworldy744 жыл бұрын
Wel if you read Quran, it does not say it is a new religion. It says it is the same religion given to Abraham, Moses and Jesus. So it bounds to have some commonality with Christianity and Judaism.
@leanderbarreto65233 жыл бұрын
Every religion did
@nasticanasta2 жыл бұрын
@@gandalfthegrey2592es it did, it is like dog waste
@OH_IO_777Күн бұрын
You made me laugh out loud!! You have no idea!!! Are you certain that you're talking about Islam and not confusing it with Christianity? As per hundreds of scholars, the Trinity is a pagan idea that came from 5 or 6 religions before Christianity, including the pagan Roman Empire. Christmas itself is a pagan celebration occasion for the birth of one of the gods. The Christmas tree is a pagan ritual... There are so many things that came to Christianity from the pagan religions of the Roman Empire. If you're a Christian, please do yourself a favor and go investigate your religion rather than talk without knowledge about the only pure religion in the world…Go and study Islam before saying nonsense! Oh, and by the way, give me one thing that says we are pagan. Don't tell me that kissing the black stone is how you would prove to me that you know nothing! :P
@subramayamrvr87743 жыл бұрын
When Adam and Eve story is so unscientific what about the extended stories.
@omarhab36893 жыл бұрын
@JAI BHAVANI JAI SHIVAJI who hurt you ?
@wizardmongol48683 жыл бұрын
its so funny seeing Hindus talking down to everyone else
@leanderbarreto65233 жыл бұрын
Religion is outdated in the 21 St century
@wizardmongol48683 жыл бұрын
@@leanderbarreto6523 literally the genetic fallacy
@c.w_4 жыл бұрын
Check out Dan Gibson’s findings that points to archaeological evidence and Islam’s beginnings in Petra, Jordan. A valid hypothesis!
@farishope65404 жыл бұрын
As a Jordanian close to Petra, and as a Muslim I tell you, his argument is an insult to the human brain.
@mur55094 жыл бұрын
I agree, insult to the human brain
@fantasia553 жыл бұрын
@@farishope6540 Gibson proved that all the early mosques pointed to Petra.
@farishope65403 жыл бұрын
@@fantasia55 They were pointed to Al-Quds (the Arabic name for Jerusalem). However, when you are in Mecca and Al Madina (where the early mosques where built), both of Al-Quds and Petra are to your north.
@fantasia553 жыл бұрын
@@farishope6540 It was assumed they pointed to Jerusalem, but actual measurements show they point to Petra.
@gullmohammad5071 Жыл бұрын
Too simplistic telegraphic description of revelation process...and ....
@sivad10254 жыл бұрын
Did anyone else click just to see if this old guy actually has partially blue hair?
@twnb77334 жыл бұрын
-----Muhammad : A forged Biography kzbin.info/www/bejne/pouofoF9otaBnaM
@lizicadumitru96834 жыл бұрын
@Andre Agrippa Ha!
@moe944004 жыл бұрын
Hi
@moe944004 жыл бұрын
Hiji
@moe944004 жыл бұрын
Andre Agrippa hii
@HassanRadwan1334 жыл бұрын
Very interesting but he didn't address the question we all want answered... What's up with your blue hair?
@mafizulislam46743 жыл бұрын
History teaches us more I should be clear from myths, and real religion . I search for the final real religion that I have to follow.
@ayoubzahiri19183 жыл бұрын
the ultimate truth is , there is only god, both in the physical and spiritual world, ego is a poor attempt to create separation and forget god, religions are made by men who experienced ' ego death', i did too and god is beyond comprehension and he's all that exist in the universe. ALL RELIGIONS ARE SINGING ONE SONG, one creator , one reality
@esbenm65443 жыл бұрын
There is nothing but your hopes that point to the existence of any god.