Ahmadis are not Muslims brother. And they consider Mirza as as a prophet; if they simply considered him the Messiah, there wouldn't be that much of a problem.
@davud295 ай бұрын
Well said, Ahmadis/Qadianis are straight up kuffar
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
If they believed Mirza was the Messiah, it would still be a problem for Allah has stated in his Kitab Al-Quran that the messiah is Jesus only.
@greyralph16375 ай бұрын
@@unrealBudAlShafi their messiah died in the loo
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
@@greyralph1637 True, the guy said he'd die in Makkah or Madina. Bro died in his own Dar Al-Hijrah
@inamurrahmansir94715 ай бұрын
I am from India so I know many things about them Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani of punjab, British ruled India proclaimed himself as both Prophet Isa and Imam Mahdi. He was the big supporter of British. The Scholars of India gave fatwa against him and declared him and all his followers as Apostate . They are called Qadiyani and Mirzai in the subcontinent Mirza Masroor Ahmad is there current leader. claims to be the Khalifah These Disbelievers observe an annual gathering for preaching there religion in Qadian,Punjab,India.
@Iraniansunnimuslim5 ай бұрын
Guys pray for my grandfather, he just passed away.
@KA28995 ай бұрын
May allah bless and have mercy on his soul.
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Brother... May Allah, forgive him, raise his rank among those who are guided, and take care of those he leaves behind him.
@Iraniansunnimuslim5 ай бұрын
Thanks for the kind prayers.
@LeKarelianne5 ай бұрын
Innalillahi.
@ahmedaltlawy32005 ай бұрын
May Allah bless and have mercy on his soul
@coffeeenjoyer8035 ай бұрын
أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ ثَلَاثُ فِرَقٍ الْأَثَرِيَّةُ وَإِمَامُهُمْ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ حَنْبَلٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ وَالْأَشْعَرِيَّةُ وَإِمَامُهُمْ أَبُو الْحَسَنِ الْأَشْعَرِيُّ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ وَالْمَاتُرِيدِيَّةُ وَإِمَامُهُمْ أَبُو مَنْصُورٍ الْمَاتُرِيدِيُّ. “Ahl al-sunnah wa’l-jama‘ah is three groups: •Atharis, whose leader is Ahmad b. Hanbal, may Allah be pleased with him; •Ash‘aris, whose leader is Abu’l-Hasan al-Ash‘ari, may Allah have mercy on him; and •Maturidis, whose leader is Abu Mansur al-Maturidi.” [Imam al-Saffarini Al-Hanbali, Lawami‘ al-Anwar al-Bahiyyah, p. 73]
@yernus5 ай бұрын
1:45 Salihiyya is just shower thoughts
@duralumin_5 ай бұрын
Lmao
@محمدالامريكي-ج9م5 ай бұрын
Athari and salafi are the same thing. Salafies don't reject the schools of thought but just don't take them as kind of dogma and refer back to The Quran and Sunnah upon the way of the salaf as-saleh. As the sheikhs/imams are not infallible.
@misterpokinjo5 ай бұрын
exactly some people are strict into one school and reject all other opinions
@apexinn5 ай бұрын
Nope, Salafis are mujasima, atharis are not.
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
@@apexinn Lol nice Takfir of Salafis
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
@user-hj4ym7ug3h also, they aren't Mujassimah, Would you say it's Tajsim to describe Allah as he described himself? If Allah says he has a yad(hand in arabic) am I a Mujassim for saying this as well? No! Unless you want to say Allāh Spoke words of Tajsim in his glorious book.
@misterpokinjo5 ай бұрын
@@apexinn ur good at lying just like at ignoring what الله said about himself
@hamzanazrabi003 ай бұрын
the sound of the last theology is like when you’re waiting for an update to get finished
@dahaliantongue5 ай бұрын
Interesting fact: One extreme Shia sect believed that Ali was God, and Omar was devil, any good things come from Ali while any bad things come from Omar, similar theological attitude as in Marcionism and Zoroastrianism.
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Our Facts master is back🔥🔥🔥
@dahaliantongue5 ай бұрын
@@AncientTraveller-fq9tq I forgot the name of the sect I am sorry so many interesting form of ‘Islams’ back then what we have is only one bit of them and it survived, as the tradition of The Prophet said so
@Indocryptic5 ай бұрын
I believe that was the Alawites?
@mynameistomfoolery54703 ай бұрын
The Ghulat are not considering Shia.
@ZaidRamadhan-s6y20 күн бұрын
And they contradict what Shi'a Islam teaches, and for that reason they should not be grouped with us Shi'a. They are ghulat, who have been dealt with in our books in many ahadith. A prime example is how the Imam Ali (AS) reacts to Ibn Saba (LA)
@pasha967110 күн бұрын
Salafi is a minhaj while athari is a aqeedah, salafi's are athari in aqeedah
@ysfis5 ай бұрын
The Murji'a are definitely not extinct. You see alot of them in the UK, where they act as the Kings guard for tyrants of the Gulf. They scream "I AM SALAFI YOU ARE NOT SALAFI", but both Salafiyya and the Salaf are free from them.
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
No, this is not Irjā that the tyrants of the gulf are not considered Kuffar but they're simply Fusāq, they are Salafiyah.
@Abuaaliyah15 ай бұрын
Madkhali are more like the khawarij than the murjia. The murjia were liberals
@ysfis5 ай бұрын
@@unrealBudAlShafi they are kuffar tawaghīt. A man who is steadfast upon multiple Nawaqid is a murtad. We don't hold different standards for rulers. And if you do, then you are exactly the madkhali murji'i we are talking about. And you are most certainly upon clear irjā.
@ysfis5 ай бұрын
@@Abuaaliyah1 they have both traits. Towards the clearly apostate rulers they are murji'a, but towards the Muslims they are khawarij.
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
@@ysfis I'd Argue people like you are Khawārij
@Kaliphate5 ай бұрын
This may be a hot take, but I think the existence of multiple (non-deviant) schools of thought shows how lively the ummah is. More perspectives interpreting Allah's word means more oppurtunities for us to understand. I personally don't subscribe to any one, and just consider myself to be Muslim. It's still interesting to see how many educated scholars interpret the same thing.
@JohnSmith-gv7qm4 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyya is a separate religion. It has its own supposed prophet named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as he said in his own writing: "I am, therefore, a follower as well as a prophet." Tajalliyti Ilahiyya, pg 19-20. Roohani Khazain, Vol 20, pg 411. This directly contradicts all qiraat of ayah 33 in Surah Al-Ahzab where the word خاتِم and خاتَم make it clear there is no possiblity of a prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Although the Ahmadis claim that he was not law-bearing this is contradicted by this ordering of the payment of khuddam and atfal chanda payments which were never commanded by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) so therefore he came with new laws. The Ahamdiyya religion has added Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to the meaning of the kalimah as outlined by his son Mirza Bashir Ahmad: "After the advent of the Promised Messiah, the connotation of the name Muhammad in the kalimah has expanded to include one more prophet [i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].” Kalimat ul Fasl, p. 158 This makes Ahmadiyya a separate religion from Islam. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has said that he was a false prophet. He said in his letter called "A Warning to the Pretender of Divinity": J.H. Smyth Pigott, Pastor of… London, has recently announced himself as God… on the 7th and 14th of September 1902… God has, therefore, commanded me to warn him… He does not only utter the blasphemy of calling himself the very “Lord Jesus”… I, therefore, warn him through this notice that if he does not repent of this irreverent claim, he shall be soon annihilated, even in my life-time… God has borne witness to my truth with heavenly signs shown in thousands… The death of Mr. Pigott within my life-time shall be another sign of my truth. If I die before Mr. Pigott, I am not the true Messiah nor am I from God…" Yet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died before Mr. Piggot and therefore he disproved himself as a prophet of God. Furthermore, Newspapers still recorded Piggot claiming his divinity in 1904, 1905, 1906, and 1908 (3 months before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death) and in 1908 after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death: https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WH19040816.2.13 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88] https: //www.britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/bl/0002063/19060915/084/0006 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28 http: //www. britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400 Alhamdulillah for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own self-exposure as a false prophet.
@zhilaliljinan87924 ай бұрын
To all Muslim brothers and sisters here...despite our differents...one day we will unite once again...InshaAllah...
@JohnSmith-gv7qm4 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyya is a separate religion. It has its own supposed prophet named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as he said in his own writing: "I am, therefore, a follower as well as a prophet." Tajalliyti Ilahiyya, pg 19-20. Roohani Khazain, Vol 20, pg 411. This directly contradicts all qiraat of ayah 33 in Surah Al-Ahzab where the word خاتِم and خاتَم make it clear there is no possiblity of a prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Although the Ahmadis claim that he was not law-bearing this is contradicted by this ordering of the payment of khuddam and atfal chanda payments which were never commanded by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) so therefore he came with new laws. The Ahamdiyya religion has added Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to the meaning of the kalimah as outlined by his son Mirza Bashir Ahmad: "After the advent of the Promised Messiah, the connotation of the name Muhammad in the kalimah has expanded to include one more prophet [i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].” Kalimat ul Fasl, p. 158 This makes Ahmadiyya a separate religion from Islam. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has said that he was a false prophet. He said in his letter called "A Warning to the Pretender of Divinity": J.H. Smyth Pigott, Pastor of… London, has recently announced himself as God… on the 7th and 14th of September 1902… God has, therefore, commanded me to warn him… He does not only utter the blasphemy of calling himself the very “Lord Jesus”… I, therefore, warn him through this notice that if he does not repent of this irreverent claim, he shall be soon annihilated, even in my life-time… God has borne witness to my truth with heavenly signs shown in thousands… The death of Mr. Pigott within my life-time shall be another sign of my truth. If I die before Mr. Pigott, I am not the true Messiah nor am I from God…" Yet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died before Mr. Piggot and therefore he disproved himself as a prophet of God. Furthermore, Newspapers still recorded Piggot claiming his divinity in 1904, 1905, 1906, and 1908 (3 months before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death) and in 1908 after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death: https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WH19040816.2.13 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88] https: //www.britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/bl/0002063/19060915/084/0006 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28 http: //www. britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400 Alhamdulillah for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own self-exposure as a false prophet.
@overlord51365 ай бұрын
لا اله الا الله *** محمد رسول الله *** علی ولی الله *** proud to believe in twelve IMAMs and waiting for my savior Mahdi AS
@MMAmini125 ай бұрын
0:30 Hadith of the twelve successors Narrated by al-Bukhaari (no. 7222); Muslim (no. 1821). According to the version narrated by al-Bukhaari, it says: “There will be twelve rulers.” Then he said something I did not hear, and my father said that he said: “All of them will be from Quraysh.” حَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى، حَدَّثَنَا غُنْدَرٌ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ، سَمِعْتُ جَابِرَ بْنَ سَمُرَةَ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ " يَكُونُ اثْنَا عَشَرَ أَمِيرًا ـ فَقَالَ كَلِمَةً لَمْ أَسْمَعْهَا فَقَالَ أَبِي إِنَّهُ قَالَ ـ كُلُّهُمْ مِنْ قُرَيْشٍ ". Bible genesis 17:20 The christian translation: And as for Ishmael, I have heard you; behold, I have blessed him and will make him fruitful and multiply him exceedingly greatly. He shall father twelve princes, and I will make him into a great nation. וּֽלְיִשְׁמָעֵאל֮ שְׁמַעְתִּ֒יךָ֒ הִנֵּ֣ה ׀ בֵּרַ֣כְתִּי אֹת֗וֹ וְהִפְרֵיתִ֥י אֹת֛וֹ וְהִרְבֵּיתִ֥י אֹת֖וֹ בִּמְאֹ֣ד מְאֹ֑ד שְׁנֵים־עָשָׂ֤ר נְשִׂיאִם֙ יוֹלִ֔יד וּנְתַתִּ֖יו לְג֥וֹי גָּדֽוֹל׃ God says he will bless Ishmael (Ismail) a.s. with (בִּמְאֹ֣ד מְאֹ֑ד שְׁנֵים־עָשָׂ֤ר נְשִׂיאִם֙) (bim-’ōḏ mə-’ōḏ; šə-nêm- ‘ā-śār nə-śî-’im) However I believe (bim-’ōḏ mə-’ōḏ) is a name & was split & forced to translate to (exceedingly greatly). & the correct translation is Mohammad & 12 Leader.
@the_odd_cat5535 ай бұрын
1. You don’t believe in the authenticity of Sahih Bukhari, so why do you quote it? 2. The hadith doesn’t say Imams but Amir, and nothing in that Hadith shows that giving bayah to those 12 is a pillar of the religion. The hadith also doesn’t name them. Your twelfth Imam doesn’t even exist.
@UC5kym7PU5p4gqtCGShcXhFA5 ай бұрын
brothers like this, hatred is one of the ways to cover our knowledge and awareness and religion is one of our ways to find the truth if the brothers are religious while looking for the fault of other religions, then whatever the religion of the brothers must be wrong 0:51
@MMAmini125 ай бұрын
@@the_odd_cat553 if I brought you sources that I believe in, most of our brothers who are Sunni would think it's not authentic. But you can find it in the most authentic Sunni books like Sahih al-Bukhari & Sahih al-Muslim.
@the_odd_cat5535 ай бұрын
@@MMAmini12 So you cite sources you wholeheartedly reject and whose narrators you even takfir, to confuse the Muslims?
@MMAmini125 ай бұрын
@@the_odd_cat553 to let Sunni brothers know that such a Hadith exist in their books as well. Since many don't even know this.
@Udanti75 ай бұрын
I am just a Sunni Muslim!
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
And A sunni is only from one of these groups, that is, the saved sect.
@misterpokinjo5 ай бұрын
that means u dont know ur aqeedah and ur religion
@Umar-iv4iw5 ай бұрын
We are "just" Muslims , not divided in any sect
@misterpokinjo5 ай бұрын
@@Umar-iv4iw people who follow Quran Sunnah will enter Jannah, not those ppl who beat themselves or dance in mosque
@IslamicEsoteric5 ай бұрын
@@unrealBudAlShafino, Athari, Asha'irah and Maturidi are all saved sect within Ahl Sunnah Wal Jamaah
@youyah32195 ай бұрын
I believe there are some cases where there is no place to think , cases like these are very clear and have clear scriptures describing them like prayer for example... but for other cases human thinking is essential like govern system for example
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
I completely agree Akhi. Thanks for being one of the few guys, that touch the intellectual side of this topic.
@youyah32195 ай бұрын
@@AncientTraveller-fq9tq Thanks Akhi... May Allah guide us all to the right thing
@newmobils82945 ай бұрын
The Shia twelver theology is inaccurate as we have two epistemological schools the Usulis (which are now the dominant) & Akhbaris (which are now considered esoteric due to their very small numbers but they still exist) the Usulis are in favoring the use of ijtihad (i.e., reasoning) in the creation of new rules of fiqh; in assessing hadith to exclude traditions they believe unreliable; and in considering it obligatory to obey a mujtahid when seeking to determine Islamically correct behavior. While Akhbaris rejects the use of reasoning by trained Islamic jurisprudents (faqih) to derive verdicts in Islamic law, maintaining it is forbidden (haram) to follow the legal rulings of anyone but one of the "Fourteen Infallibles" of Twelver Islam. And to clarify about Usulis they don't comprise their religion for the modernistic understanding of morality & human rights for social justice we just try to get the most correct fiqh by logic & reliable sources which will lead us to the right path insha'Allah.
@archaic10265 ай бұрын
The video was about aqeedah though, which as far as I know is not different between usulis and akhbaris yeah?
@Super-Shafs5 ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah. As a Muslim with more liberal and laid-back standards, I'm proud that my religion is open to multiple interpretations. Mass media in the west makes us look primitive and rigid, while we are as diverse as the rest of life on earth
@ToHimWeWillBeReturned5 ай бұрын
I don't know if this is sarcasm.
@Recitationsoftheheart_official5 ай бұрын
What the hell
@fluto69975 ай бұрын
Why is everyone hating this?
@Justaprix5 ай бұрын
Sarcastic
@LeafSouls5 ай бұрын
Whats wrong with the replies here?
@sp4nn_i5 ай бұрын
something wrong akhi, Salafis are atharis, they follow the aqeedah of traditionalists, that's why alot of us like Shaykh Ibn Tayyimah and other Athari scholars
@spec_wasted4 ай бұрын
but they reject hanafi and other schools of thoughts don't they ?
@law-fp2ec4 ай бұрын
@@spec_wastedNo they don't they just say you don't need to follow a specific mezhep strictly but they respect all 4 imams and see them as the salaf as salihin
@Xenor9994 ай бұрын
@@spec_wastedrejection is only done when it contradicts with Qur'an or sunnah.otherwise they don't have a problem with it.and salafis mostly follow the hanbali fiqh but they don't blindly follow it as madhab is a path not Qur'an or sunnah neccesarily
@zahraaael4 ай бұрын
no not necessarily, i am salafi and follow hanbali madhab, similar but not same
@sp4nn_i4 ай бұрын
@@zahraaael Eh? I am talking about aqeedah not madhab, you can be a Maliki and a salafi
@airatmolumo72025 ай бұрын
I see why the extinct ones are extinct
@randomnormie86905 ай бұрын
Atharis and salafis are the same
@Ibn_jala5 ай бұрын
True
@Alma39245 ай бұрын
Meh some salafis are biased in their thinking and ignore some of the teaching of the Quran itself
@greentube13575 ай бұрын
No, salaifs claim to be athari but they aren't
@Ibn_jala5 ай бұрын
@@greentube1357 Everyone claims Salafism... and the people of Hadith (Al-Athariya) are the true Salafists
@vlamrcisco58385 ай бұрын
@@greentube1357 is this some rage bait?
@sergeantkawaii80705 ай бұрын
I appreciate these I guess unbiased (at least it seems) videos
@Kratoswhat5 ай бұрын
This is actually a well informed meme! Finally, a Muslim meme that does not mix the Jurisprudence and the Aqidah. Well done brother.
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
🤝
@AfganNecdet21 күн бұрын
Maturidiyya and Eshariyya
@ojhib95184 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyyah aren't Muslims
@maulanadimyat25454 ай бұрын
Jabriyya is extinct only in theory, while in practice many muslim unknowningly practive this theological school.
@putraswarga6083 ай бұрын
Well said
@UC5kym7PU5p4gqtCGShcXhFA5 ай бұрын
brothers like this, hatred is one of the ways to cover our knowledge and awareness and religion is one of our ways to find the truth if the brothers are religious while looking for the fault of other religions, then whatever the religion of the brothers must be wrong
@nazmulahsanruhan70805 ай бұрын
Salafis do not follow Salaf, they follow Ibn Taimiya and Ibn Al-Kayyum. Ash'ari, Maturidi and Athari truely follow Salaf.
@Trysomieflexntjes5 ай бұрын
Ibn Taimiya and ibl al Kayumm follow the Salaf.
@nazmulahsanruhan70805 ай бұрын
@@Trysomieflexntjes Not always. Many of their statements contradict with the Salaf's. They had some innovations in their aqidah. If you want to follow Salaf follow them directly not through another man.
@mahmud2.5 ай бұрын
@@nazmulahsanruhan7080Can you name some contradictions? (Just tryna learn cus I find this interesting)
@nazmulahsanruhan70805 ай бұрын
@@mahmud2. According to Salaf, Allah is free from body. But According to Ibn Taimiya, we cannot say that Allah has a body or not. According to Salaf, Allah is free from space or place. But according to Ibn Al-Kayyum, Angels are near to Allah and humans are far from Allah. This statement adds the concept of space or place to Allah. According to Salaf, Allah's true words are beyond sound and letters. But Salafis do not accept that.
@vlamrcisco58385 ай бұрын
@@nazmulahsanruhan7080 Firstly it's Ibn Al Qayyim and I'll respond to body thing firstly in this message. Sheikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may God have mercy on him, said: “The word ‘body’ refers to a totality. It may mean a compound whose parts were separated and then brought together, or something that can be divided and separated, or a compound of matter and form, or a compound of individual parts that are called individual essences, and God Almighty is above that. All of it, or it was separate and came together, or to accept separation and division, which is the separation of some thing from another, or any other combination that is impossible. What is meant by the body may be what is referred to, or what is seen, or what the attributes do, and God Almighty will be seen in the Hereafter. And the attributes are based on it, and people refer to it when supplicating with their hands, hearts, faces, and eyes. If he means by saying: It is not the body of this meaning, it is said to him: This meaning that you intended to deny with this wording is an established meaning with the authenticity of what is transmitted and is clear and reasonable, and you have not provided evidence to deny it. As for the wording, So it is an innovation of denial and affirmation. It is not in the Qur’an, nor the Sunnah, nor the saying of any of the nation’s predecessors and imams, to use the word “body” to refer to the attributes of God Almighty, neither as a denial nor as a confirmation. Likewise, the word “essence” and “al-miyahi’” and similar expressions about which the scholars of hadith theology disputed in denial and affirmation. End quote from “Bayan Talbis.” Al-Jahmiya” (1/550). It has become clear from this that the word “body” is a general word that can be both true and false, and it is an inventive word that is neither denied nor confirmed in the texts, so it is necessary to avoid it. The one who says that God is a body and not like other bodies should be advised and invited to stand by what God described Himself with in His Book or on the tongue of His Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, and to adhere to the approach of the predecessors. Al-Safarini, may God have mercy on him, said: “Imam Ahmad, may God be pleased with him, said: God Almighty can only be described by what He described Himself with, and His Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, described him. We do not go beyond the Qur’an and the Hadith. Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said: The doctrine of the Salaf is that they describe God Almighty by what He has been described with.” Himself, and with what His Messenger, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, described it without distortion or disruption, and without adaptation or representation. The one that is disrupted worships nothingness, the one that is represented worships an idol, and the Muslim worships the God of the earth and the sky. End quote from “Lawaami’ Al-Anwar Al-Bahiyyah” (1/24). and we can discuss it more if you wish such as other things I'll talk about.
Alhamdulillah from getting Islam from the purified household
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
@saytheshahadanow also as scholars. Jā'far ibn Muhammad رضي الله عنه, their sixth imām taught Our ulema such as Imam Malik, Imam Abu Hanifah, and Sufyan Ath-Thawri رضي الله عنهم.
@yernus5 ай бұрын
Even if you actually get Islam from the purified household; you need to question all religious matters that was taught to you, if you want to find the truth. (The next set of questions show the process of questioning, these are not my actual beliefs) Maybe Islam is not the true religion, who knows? Even if it is, how can we be so sure that it wasn't degenerated over time to a point where the "fundementals of Islam" as we know aren't actually a part of Islam? Does God actually exist? How can I know, if any God exists at all, God contacted humans? Is the Quran actually perfectly preserved as they claim to be? Even if it is, what does "perfectly preserved" mean? Is the manuscript preserved, or is there some kind of an error correction code that perfectly preserves it? (I'm hinting at something for the last 3 questions) Are there any other candidates besides the Quran that can be God's words? By asking these kinds of questions, and seeking answers; you'll definitely find the truth at some point. But you need to do some research, read through some books, constantly use your mind, think freely, seek out empirical evidence, be objective, logical, intelligent, and skeptic of any information. Inshallah, we'll all be guided to the ultimate truth. (And yes, I became a Muslim by the process I explained above)
@rosenbaumquartz5 ай бұрын
Why do you reject the purified household?
@Ibrahim.l205 ай бұрын
Yes but the real ja'far as Sadiq not superman @@unrealBudAlShafi
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
@@Ibrahim.l20 our Jafar As-Sadiq didn't state Allah's Mashea is Makhluq as well lol
@abdullahhussain96755 ай бұрын
akh make one on subcontinent institutions like deobandi, barelvi, jamiat ur rasheed, banuri town etc.
@Nagvanshieus5 ай бұрын
Even though i am not muslim but i really like how almost all Islamic schools focus on justice and God, being from a country with world's 3rd largest muslim population, videos like these help me understand my countrymen better.
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Very happy to hear that my Brother
@randomd13975 ай бұрын
If you mean in a sense of unity, it's far from that.
@Nagvanshieus5 ай бұрын
@@randomd1397 muslims have been living in this subcontinent since 800 years, how is there an issue of unity?
@dnitisastra5 ай бұрын
1:39 guy on the right is usually attributed as Sunan Kalijaga, not an Ahmadi since it wouldn’t be existed yet but an Ashari Sufi Shafiite prominent preacher famous for popularizing Islam amongst Javanese
@𡆗5 ай бұрын
Nggih 🗿
@erdolf285 ай бұрын
Did maturidis and sufis kinda dirty
@apexinn4 ай бұрын
what
@thepixelgunner15 ай бұрын
There is no god except Allah,and may you have an awesome eid al adha
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Barakallah Akhi
@Sg190th5 ай бұрын
I'm just plain Muslim. Never divide.
@fishkartoshki23245 ай бұрын
We don't divide because of fun but to defreincate between what is the right beleif and what brings to hellfire and the prophete said in the meaning that there will be groups between muslims
@Sg190th5 ай бұрын
@@fishkartoshki2324 That is true.
@SuhaibTaymi5 ай бұрын
normal muslim is the Athari/Salafi who just follow the original religious sources without external philosophy
@fishkartoshki23244 ай бұрын
The salfyyah that we see know is wrong because as salaf are the three century's after the immigration of the prophet and to follow the prophet is to follow the sahab and the taby and after theme and the four imam abou hanifah for example is one of them
@JohnSmith-gv7qm4 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyya is a separate religion. It has its own supposed prophet named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as he said in his own writing: "I am, therefore, a follower as well as a prophet." Tajalliyti Ilahiyya, pg 19-20. Roohani Khazain, Vol 20, pg 411. This directly contradicts all qiraat of ayah 33 in Surah Al-Ahzab where the word خاتِم and خاتَم make it clear there is no possiblity of a prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Although the Ahmadis claim that he was not law-bearing this is contradicted by this ordering of the payment of khuddam and atfal chanda payments which were never commanded by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) so therefore he came with new laws. The Ahamdiyya religion has added Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to the meaning of the kalimah as outlined by his son Mirza Bashir Ahmad: "After the advent of the Promised Messiah, the connotation of the name Muhammad in the kalimah has expanded to include one more prophet [i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].” Kalimat ul Fasl, p. 158 This makes Ahmadiyya a separate religion from Islam. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has said that he was a false prophet. He said in his letter called "A Warning to the Pretender of Divinity": J.H. Smyth Pigott, Pastor of… London, has recently announced himself as God… on the 7th and 14th of September 1902… God has, therefore, commanded me to warn him… He does not only utter the blasphemy of calling himself the very “Lord Jesus”… I, therefore, warn him through this notice that if he does not repent of this irreverent claim, he shall be soon annihilated, even in my life-time… God has borne witness to my truth with heavenly signs shown in thousands… The death of Mr. Pigott within my life-time shall be another sign of my truth. If I die before Mr. Pigott, I am not the true Messiah nor am I from God…" Yet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died before Mr. Piggot and therefore he disproved himself as a prophet of God. Furthermore, Newspapers still recorded Piggot claiming his divinity in 1904, 1905, 1906, and 1908 (3 months before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death) and in 1908 after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death: https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WH19040816.2.13 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88] https: //www.britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/bl/0002063/19060915/084/0006 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28 http: //www. britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400 Alhamdulillah for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own self-exposure as a false prophet.
@AtakanErgu5 ай бұрын
I am Athari from Turkey
@aaquib20104 ай бұрын
Mashallah brother, did not know u existed
@law-fp2ec4 ай бұрын
@@aaquib2010I'm also athari and Turkish but from Germany
@aaquib20104 ай бұрын
@@law-fp2ec I was in Germany last month and mashallah lot of Turkish mosques everywhere. But I found great Syrians and Iraqis and Algerians with strong iman and good aqidah. I was in Ulm
@A1f4h4d4 ай бұрын
Based I'm salafi athari from India
@PeterGriffin-fv8yr4 ай бұрын
@@A1f4h4dare you hanafi or hanbali?
@mahmedakan5 ай бұрын
Please do Current day Islamic rulers next ❤❤
@hamzanazrabi003 ай бұрын
what does yemeni music have to do with qadriyya, and can you also explain what qadriyya
@abu-karz5 ай бұрын
Remember real Islam is quran and sunnah with the understanding of the salaf under the athari creed. The rest are all false deviated and wrong sects that either cause division in the ummah and make us suffer. If you are a proper muslim then you must follow Islam using Quran and Sunnah with the understanding of the salaf. No cursing the sahaba No philosophical rationalism or any philosophy. No whirling dervishes or self flagellation no ya ali ya ali only Ya Allah
@canwegetashoutouttoworking20025 ай бұрын
Philosophy is halal brother, I don't know why you think it's bad. We must use our minds given to us by Allah to understand the world around us better. Philosophy is a big part of why the Islamic Golden Age happened.
@Lucerna999Ай бұрын
Blud said no philosophy
@rifarira91604 ай бұрын
I just know that this video gonna attract some troller in the comments. May Allah have mercy on us and guide those who astray.
@nesdanziger37415 ай бұрын
Worth mentioning that Salafis follow Athari theology. Also, these videos are very beneficial but please try not to use music with instruments as it is haram. Barak Allahu Feek
@Iraniansunnimuslim5 ай бұрын
What does the prophet say about music in the story of the two ansari girls?
@Abuaaliyah15 ай бұрын
@@Iraniansunnimuslimonly for Eid he let it slide because it is a day of festivity so he let the 2 young girls play a tambourine, but the prophet ﷺ also said “there will be people in my ummah who permit alcohol, Zina, and musical instruments”. Why would he put musical instruments along 2 major sins? Because it’s prohibited. All 4 imams agree on it.
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Barakallah Bro
@Iraniansunnimuslim5 ай бұрын
@@Abuaaliyah1 so is it allowed for ceremonies?
@brhn94525 ай бұрын
@@Iraniansunnimuslim only the daff, not instruments in general. the daff is allowed only on eid and weddings for example and only among women
@rabiulawal31655 ай бұрын
All Extinct Deviant has in Bangladesh. Can you believe that Bangladesh has all 72 deviant theology
@Mr.Protagonist5 ай бұрын
I am really surprised to know this as a Bangladeshi myself.
@Ashraf-Hrira5 ай бұрын
deviant theologies are wide spread in every Muslim nation right now mostly because lack of any real education and poverty that is wide spread
@hossainnahdi29055 ай бұрын
While the part "My nation will divide into 73 sects" is true, the part "And only one will enter paradise" is not authentic according to many great scholars. It simply emphasizes Ijtihad in our community, so there is no need for calling anyone deviants. Furthermore, if you consider Asharis and Maturidis different sects, both of them are good sects, and within the body of Ahlus Sunnah. Shaykh Dedew's statement on 73 sects: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJeYcoiueq2Hiqs
@rabiulawal31655 ай бұрын
@@hossainnahdi2905 I'm calling those 72 deviants because they have problems with Their akida. Those 72 deviants akida related problems which made them deviants. Even the time of shahhaba time those 6 deviants appear by time of ours they become 72. These 72 deviants are the successor of 6 deviants.
@Mijzara.5 ай бұрын
Salafi Islamic Student residing in Libya here! You got most of it right, however majority of Salafiyyah do have a madhab, Majority is either Hanbali or Maliki; And Athari is our Aqeedah, We believe a Salafi and an Athari is about the same thing.
@TheServantOfAllahAlmighty5 ай бұрын
correction : 1) athari and salafi are the same thing, salafi being the methodology and athar being their source of the beliefs and practices which was held by the sahaba. ahl al sunnah is only referred to the people who take the athar by the understating of the prophet and the sahaba ( salaf assalihun) 2) ahmadis are clear cut disbelievers may Allah almighty keep us steadfast on the religion and the way of salaf, and forgives the ummah and have mercy on our souls indeed we are all sinners Ameen ya rab al 'alamin.
@asharalam.5 ай бұрын
Bro Athari and Salafi are the same thing when it comes to Aqeedah
@alizaka14675 ай бұрын
Remember Shias, the family of the Prophet ﷺ includes the wives of him as well. You're nobody to accept one family and reject others. The Prophet ﷺ teaches us, not you.
@Rumeli-j8b4 ай бұрын
Nope. Refer to hadith of Kisa to know who the prophet purified and named them Ahlul Bayt.
@arteshedits5 ай бұрын
Love your content brother, whats your ethnicity btw?
@lukmannulhakim66105 ай бұрын
I'm Muhammadiyah from Indonesia 🇮🇩 Happy Eid Al Adha.. 🐮🥩
@dhiohidayatullah73265 ай бұрын
Syahadat dua melingkar 💪
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Khair Mubarak brother
@vvertyqvverty87845 ай бұрын
ahmadi not muslims
@History_Teller12505 ай бұрын
They are just a deviant sect but Muslims...
@JohnSmith-gv7qm4 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyya is a separate religion. It has its own supposed prophet named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as he said in his own writing: "I am, therefore, a follower as well as a prophet." Tajalliyti Ilahiyya, pg 19-20. Roohani Khazain, Vol 20, pg 411. This directly contradicts all qiraat of ayah 33 in Surah Al-Ahzab where the word خاتِم and خاتَم make it clear there is no possiblity of a prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Although the Ahmadis claim that he was not law-bearing this is contradicted by this ordering of the payment of khuddam and atfal chanda payments which were never commanded by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) so therefore he came with new laws. The Ahamdiyya religion has added Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to the meaning of the kalimah as outlined by his son Mirza Bashir Ahmad: "After the advent of the Promised Messiah, the connotation of the name Muhammad in the kalimah has expanded to include one more prophet [i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].” Kalimat ul Fasl, p. 158 This makes Ahmadiyya a separate religion from Islam. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has said that he was a false prophet. He said in his letter called "A Warning to the Pretender of Divinity": J.H. Smyth Pigott, Pastor of… London, has recently announced himself as God… on the 7th and 14th of September 1902… God has, therefore, commanded me to warn him… He does not only utter the blasphemy of calling himself the very “Lord Jesus”… I, therefore, warn him through this notice that if he does not repent of this irreverent claim, he shall be soon annihilated, even in my life-time… God has borne witness to my truth with heavenly signs shown in thousands… The death of Mr. Pigott within my life-time shall be another sign of my truth. If I die before Mr. Pigott, I am not the true Messiah nor am I from God…" Yet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died before Mr. Piggot and therefore he disproved himself as a prophet of God. Furthermore, Newspapers still recorded Piggot claiming his divinity in 1904, 1905, 1906, and 1908 (3 months before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death) and in 1908 after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death: https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WH19040816.2.13 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88] https: //www.britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/bl/0002063/19060915/084/0006 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28 http: //www. britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400 Alhamdulillah for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own self-exposure as a false prophet.
@figraa5 ай бұрын
Moving from Ashari to Salafi/Wahhabi/Madkhali ❤❤❤
@IbnAbdulKhader32.5 ай бұрын
Salafi’s doesn’t reject the 4 schools of thought, please correct it.🤗
@PrasTyo-ug7mn5 ай бұрын
Salafi is not part of sunni,but they are respect all of sunni scholar and sunni view.good job,may allah bless and guide always be with us👍👍👍❤❤❤
@FalconPeregrine-ht4oc4 ай бұрын
Salafi are the closest to Sunna
@asharalam.5 ай бұрын
Atharis take the apparent meaning not literal btw
@rajairfan27685 ай бұрын
Its very easy to see why Murji'ah went extinct based on their theology.
@MohammedAlSharif20025 ай бұрын
Salafi theology is another name for Athari 🤦🏻♂️
@SuhaibTaymi5 ай бұрын
Salafism and Atharism are one and the same thing, not two different sects It does not follow the literal text in the literal sense of each word individually, but rather in the contextual and pragmatic sense as the Prophet, the Companions, and the scholars of the Salaf understood it. They do not acknowledge the division of reason versus transmission, but rather they say that they are both one thing, as long as the transmission indicated by reason is proven rationally and justified rationally. They only say that what is conclusive evidence is presented on what is over the lacked one, regardless of whether it is rational or textual The Mu'tazilites do not reject hadiths, and they are Sunnis in jurisprudence, but rather say that Ahad hadiths are not to be used in theology. As for the Kalamists, their rational and philosophical meaning is the Greek philosophy, and this is what is rejected, as for the sound innate reason and common science. Everyone agrees.
@seekingsalam5 ай бұрын
I think the Jahmiyyah and the Batiniyyah would've been worth mentioning. BārakAllāhu fīk 💕
@seekingsalam5 ай бұрын
I also think that mentioning Salafīs/Atharis as literalists is wrong. We reject literalism. We say affirm the attributes upon their apparent meanings (the dhahir of the texts). The dhāhir can be majāzī OR haqīqī. (Metaphorical or literal) It's just what comes to mind when one reads the text.
@anurnessedsch72185 ай бұрын
Rationality ist the groundbasic for God Words...
@Umaaaaarrrrr5 ай бұрын
Eid Mubarak everyone
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Khair Mubarak Akhi
@edenia90805 ай бұрын
Chad Hanafi Maturidi
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
😉
@Shuja_Khyber5 ай бұрын
الحمد لله
@misterpokinjo5 ай бұрын
chad? while rejecting what Allah said about himself?
@apexinn5 ай бұрын
@@misterpokinjo Me when I make up stuff:
@misterpokinjo5 ай бұрын
@@apexinn none madeup stuff Allah told us he is above his throne but ofc u reject Quran
@IslamicAwareness275 ай бұрын
murji'ah are not extinct, they are not a theological school, a person who thinks belief is in the hearth and has nothing to do with deeds is a murji'. same can be said about qadariyah and jabriyah. some sects can have multiple deviances, for instance rafidas (twelvers) are jahmis/mu3tazili when it come to attributes of Allah, qadari when it comes to human actions, extrem shia when it comes to companions, khariji when it comes to dealing with rulers and the jamaa3a of muslims, quburi when it comes to saints and du3a' to humans, etc... my point is there is a difference between the names of sects (theological schools as you call them) and names of particular deviances. salafis do not reject madhabs, except a minority, salafis are just atharis, salafism is a movements.
@apexinn4 ай бұрын
Atharis are mufawidah Salafis are not.
@huriale16175 ай бұрын
You still have neo-mutazilite believers today. But yes, indeed, there isn't any continuous lignage of mutazilite believers after their disparition under the Abbassid caliphate.
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
True the Mu'tazilah do exist today, I know one person who is mu'tazili
@dahaliantongue5 ай бұрын
Not so interesting fact: Salafi theology is actually Athari theology while orthodox Hanbalis from which Salafism emerged reject their Athari theology and claiming to be the real Atharis. Basically they are not so different. Salafis no mawlid, Hanbalis go mawlid
@abdullahhussain96755 ай бұрын
ASHARI MATURIDI BASED RRAAHHHHHH
@mutaharnnouman69025 ай бұрын
Ahmadi aren't in mainstream islam. as they deny the end of prophethood
@UC5kym7PU5p4gqtCGShcXhFA5 ай бұрын
happy Eid al-Adha brother
@inamurrahmansir94715 ай бұрын
you didn't show the Kharijites school of theology
@Atu18445 ай бұрын
Ibadis
@mohammedjafer92655 ай бұрын
No body trying to learn bidah
@rinzler7495 ай бұрын
when did salafis reject the 4 established schools of thought? and yes the other theology are rejected
@SuhaibTaymi5 ай бұрын
Saying Ahmadis r muslims just because they r believing in Prophet Muhammed SAW is like saying Muslims r jews
@JohnSmith-gv7qm4 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyya is a separate religion. It has its own supposed prophet named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as he said in his own writing: "I am, therefore, a follower as well as a prophet." Tajalliyti Ilahiyya, pg 19-20. Roohani Khazain, Vol 20, pg 411. This directly contradicts all qiraat of ayah 33 in Surah Al-Ahzab where the word خاتِم and خاتَم make it clear there is no possiblity of a prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Although the Ahmadis claim that he was not law-bearing this is contradicted by this ordering of the payment of khuddam and atfal chanda payments which were never commanded by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) so therefore he came with new laws. The Ahamdiyya religion has added Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to the meaning of the kalimah as outlined by his son Mirza Bashir Ahmad: "After the advent of the Promised Messiah, the connotation of the name Muhammad in the kalimah has expanded to include one more prophet [i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].” Kalimat ul Fasl, p. 158 This makes Ahmadiyya a separate religion from Islam. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has said that he was a false prophet. He said in his letter called "A Warning to the Pretender of Divinity": J.H. Smyth Pigott, Pastor of… London, has recently announced himself as God… on the 7th and 14th of September 1902… God has, therefore, commanded me to warn him… He does not only utter the blasphemy of calling himself the very “Lord Jesus”… I, therefore, warn him through this notice that if he does not repent of this irreverent claim, he shall be soon annihilated, even in my life-time… God has borne witness to my truth with heavenly signs shown in thousands… The death of Mr. Pigott within my life-time shall be another sign of my truth. If I die before Mr. Pigott, I am not the true Messiah nor am I from God…" Yet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died before Mr. Piggot and therefore he disproved himself as a prophet of God. Furthermore, Newspapers still recorded Piggot claiming his divinity in 1904, 1905, 1906, and 1908 (3 months before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death) and in 1908 after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death: https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WH19040816.2.13 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88] https: //www.britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/bl/0002063/19060915/084/0006 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28 http: //www. britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400 Alhamdulillah for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own self-exposure as a false prophet.
@Old.northern5 ай бұрын
Asharis seem to be the best
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
Asharis are stupid their Own Ulema Say that Imam Ahmad believed Allah spoke with sound(contradicting their own theology)
@nykhattab4 ай бұрын
please make a part 2 to this!
@dhiohidayatullah73265 ай бұрын
Where's the "bi la ma'na wa bi la kayf" theological stance as a middle way between ash'aris and atharis?
@dahaliantongue5 ай бұрын
God says but you don’t translate it. God’s hands are God’s hands, period. You don’t derive it as “so, God has hands but you don’t know what it looks like.” According to Ash’ari standard, it is still tajsim.
@unrealBudAlShafi5 ай бұрын
That's not a middle way. Infact tafwid al mana is considered worse then ta'til for athariyah
@aaquib20104 ай бұрын
@@unrealBudAlShafibro what is tatil and tafwid? Jazakallah in advance
@unrealBudAlShafi4 ай бұрын
@aaquib2010 wa khair jazakum. Tatil is negating the attributes of Allah after they have been established from the quran and the sunnah. Example: someone says "Allah is not Al-Ali" when it is established from the quran and sunnah that he is al Ali. Tafwid al mana is leaving the meaning up to Allah. Like for example an ashari is presented with a verse and he says "only Allah knows its meaning"
@unrealBudAlShafi4 ай бұрын
@@aaquib2010 .
@ibroplatin49155 ай бұрын
you should do one that explains all the quran surahs
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Magnificent Idea
@xuharry33125 ай бұрын
1:47 💀
@たこ焼きーーたこ焼き5 ай бұрын
OP why did you use the Javanese wojak for the Ahmadi theology, here in Java we literally don't have Ahmadis 😭😭
@JohnSmith-gv7qm4 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyya is a separate religion. It has its own supposed prophet named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as he said in his own writing: "I am, therefore, a follower as well as a prophet." Tajalliyti Ilahiyya, pg 19-20. Roohani Khazain, Vol 20, pg 411. This directly contradicts all qiraat of ayah 33 in Surah Al-Ahzab where the word خاتِم and خاتَم make it clear there is no possiblity of a prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Although the Ahmadis claim that he was not law-bearing this is contradicted by this ordering of the payment of khuddam and atfal chanda payments which were never commanded by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) so therefore he came with new laws. The Ahamdiyya religion has added Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to the meaning of the kalimah as outlined by his son Mirza Bashir Ahmad: "After the advent of the Promised Messiah, the connotation of the name Muhammad in the kalimah has expanded to include one more prophet [i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].” Kalimat ul Fasl, p. 158 This makes Ahmadiyya a separate religion from Islam. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has said that he was a false prophet. He said in his letter called "A Warning to the Pretender of Divinity": J.H. Smyth Pigott, Pastor of… London, has recently announced himself as God… on the 7th and 14th of September 1902… God has, therefore, commanded me to warn him… He does not only utter the blasphemy of calling himself the very “Lord Jesus”… I, therefore, warn him through this notice that if he does not repent of this irreverent claim, he shall be soon annihilated, even in my life-time… God has borne witness to my truth with heavenly signs shown in thousands… The death of Mr. Pigott within my life-time shall be another sign of my truth. If I die before Mr. Pigott, I am not the true Messiah nor am I from God…" Yet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died before Mr. Piggot and therefore he disproved himself as a prophet of God. Furthermore, Newspapers still recorded Piggot claiming his divinity in 1904, 1905, 1906, and 1908 (3 months before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death) and in 1908 after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death: https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WH19040816.2.13 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88] https: //www.britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/bl/0002063/19060915/084/0006 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28 http: //www. britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400 Alhamdulillah for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own self-exposure as a false prophet.
@たこ焼きーーたこ焼き4 ай бұрын
@@JohnSmith-gv7qm DUDE I KNOW BRO
@yugoooooooo4 ай бұрын
MATURİDİ ELHAMDULİLLAH FROM TURKEY🐺🐺TRTR
@Ahmed-DB5 ай бұрын
Is the admin a Qadiani? "Ahmadis" are not muslims, their description mentioned here ruined the entire video. Please remove it.
@JohnSmith-gv7qm4 ай бұрын
Ahmadiyya is a separate religion. It has its own supposed prophet named Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as he said in his own writing: "I am, therefore, a follower as well as a prophet." Tajalliyti Ilahiyya, pg 19-20. Roohani Khazain, Vol 20, pg 411. This directly contradicts all qiraat of ayah 33 in Surah Al-Ahzab where the word خاتِم and خاتَم make it clear there is no possiblity of a prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Although the Ahmadis claim that he was not law-bearing this is contradicted by this ordering of the payment of khuddam and atfal chanda payments which were never commanded by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) so therefore he came with new laws. The Ahamdiyya religion has added Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to the meaning of the kalimah as outlined by his son Mirza Bashir Ahmad: "After the advent of the Promised Messiah, the connotation of the name Muhammad in the kalimah has expanded to include one more prophet [i.e. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad].” Kalimat ul Fasl, p. 158 This makes Ahmadiyya a separate religion from Islam. Furthermore, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad himself has said that he was a false prophet. He said in his letter called "A Warning to the Pretender of Divinity": J.H. Smyth Pigott, Pastor of… London, has recently announced himself as God… on the 7th and 14th of September 1902… God has, therefore, commanded me to warn him… He does not only utter the blasphemy of calling himself the very “Lord Jesus”… I, therefore, warn him through this notice that if he does not repent of this irreverent claim, he shall be soon annihilated, even in my life-time… God has borne witness to my truth with heavenly signs shown in thousands… The death of Mr. Pigott within my life-time shall be another sign of my truth. If I die before Mr. Pigott, I am not the true Messiah nor am I from God…" Yet Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died before Mr. Piggot and therefore he disproved himself as a prophet of God. Furthermore, Newspapers still recorded Piggot claiming his divinity in 1904, 1905, 1906, and 1908 (3 months before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death) and in 1908 after Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's death: https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WH19040816.2.13 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050826.2.88] https: //www.britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/bl/0002063/19060915/084/0006 https: //paperspast.natlib. govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090309.2.17.28 http: //www. britishnewspaperarchive. co.uk/viewer/BL/0000321/19270321/027/0007?_=1497108726400 Alhamdulillah for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own self-exposure as a false prophet.
@sallam17213 ай бұрын
What is the name of sufi soundtrack?
@PrinceRightyI3 ай бұрын
Actually Mu'tazila, Jabariya and Qadariya aren't extinct. They still exist albeit not too obvious.
@امين-د9خ5 ай бұрын
Brother ahmadiya is not islam sunni shia ibadi an all sects on islam have te common believe that ahmadiya is not islam but a new religion like babism
@Albani34 ай бұрын
Salafi and athari is the same. These are just names to distinguish ourselves from the misguidance so the people have a barrier in knowing between truth and falsehood. There’s an sahih Hadith that says follow the athar and another sahih Hadith that says the Prophet is the best of the Salaf. The salafi follow the athar (Hadith) that says the best are those of the first 3 generations.
@jabz81295 ай бұрын
Salafi creed is the same as athari creed and most salafis adhere to the hanbali madhab just had to correct you.
@Ashraf-Hrira5 ай бұрын
I am just Muslim. "Indeed, you ˹O Prophet˺ are not responsible whatsoever for those who have divided their faith and split into sects. Their judgment rests only with Allah. And He will inform them of what they used to do." surah Al-Anam/The cattle 159
@husseinalkalidy17 күн бұрын
who do you belive was the successor after muhammed
@Ashraf-Hrira17 күн бұрын
@@husseinalkalidy I know where you trying to go with that question and I am not interested in sectarian ramblings
@husseinalkalidy17 күн бұрын
@@Ashraf-Hrira OK, that's not logical that you don't have a sect like how do you pray what are your beliefs
@Ashraf-Hrira17 күн бұрын
@@husseinalkalidy I follow the Quran and sunnah I don't follow scholars blindly if they speaking with evidence from the Quran and sunnah I follow it if they giving their own opinions then I don't follow it simple really I wish most Muslims now a days use their heads instead of following western agents in their spread of sectarianism and division among us
@the_odd_cat5535 ай бұрын
0:02 and 1:21 are the same thing.
@MikeyDillow-ky5yh5 ай бұрын
✝️🤝☪️🤝✡️
@Bookishebhadu5 ай бұрын
Love you shia muslim brother from sunni muslim and eid mubarak
@Udanti75 ай бұрын
Khair Mubarak!
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Khair Mubarak Akhi, but I am Sunni!
@SalahudenSakhi5 ай бұрын
@@AncientTraveller-fq9tq are u maturidi
@Abdullah-ny3ec2 ай бұрын
One correction, Ahmadies can never be considered a school of theology in Islam as for being a Muslim, you should have an absolute faith in the Final Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad صلى اللّٰه عليه وسلم. As they deny this fact, so they are not Muslims.
@snifey76945 ай бұрын
How easy is it to start a Jihad?
@Roberto-r3f5 ай бұрын
The murji'ah aqida isnt extict, modern day murji'ah are the madakhila
@ihsanelirsyad19915 ай бұрын
But...did'nt Athari and Salafi is same ?
@duralumin_5 ай бұрын
No, one does tafweed al ma’na other doesnt
@huriale16175 ай бұрын
Hanafite madhab are Athari, while a Salafi, who's also an Athari, can reject the hanafite madhab.
@ihsanelirsyad19915 ай бұрын
@@huriale1617 I see, so Salafi is'nt bound by Mazhab?
@MohammedAlSharif20025 ай бұрын
@@ihsanelirsyad1991Salafi and Athari are the same thing, but some Asharis hijacked the word “Athari” and call themselves Mufawwidah. So for example they say Allah doesn’t really descend down to the lowest heaven every night even though the Hadith says so. Ignore them.
@abolfazlazhdary5 ай бұрын
Proud to be a Shia muslim
@HammadAhmad-lp8nu5 ай бұрын
Atharis do not take the literal interpretation of God's attributes. The earliest of them practiced Tafwid. The Salafis take the attributes literally and call themselves Atharis, but they truly believe in Taymi Theology of Ibn Taymiyyah.
@MohammedAlSharif20025 ай бұрын
Totally false.
@LeafSouls5 ай бұрын
Totally correct
@johnsmith36065 ай бұрын
Whats the nasheed for the Qadiani part?
@AncientTraveller-fq9tq5 ай бұрын
Description!
@johnsmith36065 ай бұрын
@@AncientTraveller-fq9tq it just leads to KZbin. I'll check again
@Basic-zr9sb5 ай бұрын
"Arabic Qaseedah in Praise of Holy Prophet Muhammad by Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5LYhHx3gbFqm6s
@johnsmith36065 ай бұрын
@@Basic-zr9sb Thank you kind sir
@MuhammadKhobaib-725 ай бұрын
BASED ASH'ARI AND MATURIDIS WWWWWWW
@A1f4h4d4 ай бұрын
Aristotelian kids
@MertGulcan-f6h3 ай бұрын
naqshbandi 🤦♂️
@mahdimehdi4455 ай бұрын
Salafi is just a school who broke from athari
@MohammedAlSharif20025 ай бұрын
Not really. Asharism is a school that broke away from The Jahmiyyah.
@Yusuf_Sc5 ай бұрын
Athari Salafi Aqidah is the Haqq
@GodIsIndeedgreat4 ай бұрын
Only the athari school is from ahlus sunnah, the rest are mubtadis
@gtedits2564 ай бұрын
1:31 why di u put a yemeni song here? veryy offensive