It's finally here! Sigma 105 emount unboxing

[@AleGav]

Love your videos. Take it to the next level with some better audio (lapel mic) or maybe a Rhode on your camera? Regardless, awesome content and new sub!

[@FUELENT]

Love you Nathan! Looking forward to seeing the art that this new lens is going to be used for.

[@pdebie1982]

That thing is massive! You will get even bigger arms now ;)

[@trikniki]

What do you think about it? I have a 70-200 2.8, if i should buy a 105mm too? Because i think with 1.4 will be nice car photos. Greetings

[@BrianSFischer]

Got one, Love it!

[@nishalpradhan1610]

Please write on the video title about the aperture as well

[@stookymedia]

Mannnnn I’ve been wanting this since I saw the teaser, but I need a 70-200 first

[@NathanBrummer]

The 70-200 is a beast.

[@MeSayus]

How are you finding the low light AF performance of this lens under low light conditions?

[@AwesomeKicks]

This or Sony 85 1.8 or 90 2.8 macro for portraits and Product photography? I already have the 55 1.8 Sony Zeiss. Would love to hear some thoughts!

[@HeroShotz]

85 is amazing for the money but if your doing product shots you may be better off with the 90 macro. This 105 monster is a portrait beast.

[@vooduuchild]

Lordy. Nice lens!

[@sujoydutta920]

hey which camera do you use?

[@soundknight]

It's spelt "amount" not "emount".

[@smokey19930209]

Brian Cullen emount not amount 🤦‍♂️

[@52701970]

What a joke of a lens. Why is the front element so big. Looks stupid

[@fazr_tv]

look great

[@Bicepautomotive]

Thats looks expensive lol

[@NathanBrummer]

No bad for what it’s capable of.

[@Azntrutek2012]

It’s may produce great photo. But goshh... i have to say it is the gigantic and most ugly prime lens ever. Lol

[@NathanBrummer]

It’s huge, but not all that bad looking imo.