I own the car !! 10.000km so far no problems ! Combined consumption 5-5.5 city ,5 highway ..If you push the car 7.5-8l/km ! Great everyday car ,excellent driving feeling !
@Fennefar3 жыл бұрын
I do around 5,5 when driving normally in a mix of city, highway and country roads. It is not fast, but it easily pulls to highway speeds here in Denmark (130 limit) :)
@mustafaserhandogruyol1619 Жыл бұрын
I drive a 2017 Vw Caddy 1.0 TSI. (102 hp claimed). 5 speed manual. original tyre size 195/65/15 with steel wheels, but i bought a 16" set with 205/55/16 tyres. almost 100.000 km. 2 passanger+calm drive consumption is about 5.5 lt with city traffic all around consumption is 7,5 once i tried to see max. consumption. an highway full throttle max. speed drive for about 300 km consumption is 9,5 lt./100 km. i think these are really good engines. for now zero issue.
@generalismoquabablinotheth590210 ай бұрын
Great little car definitely feel it handles better than mark 7, consumption is good also 👍
@roteroktober3606 ай бұрын
how long do you need to drive on the highway to get the engine to the ideal operating temperature for lowest possible fuel consumption
@johnfischer5754 Жыл бұрын
out of the question without an automatic transmission and eTSI, as this is the optimal one
@tmarinelic8 ай бұрын
So consumption at 80km/h in 5th and in 6th gear is the same?
@MrVictorbatista Жыл бұрын
And they say new petrol engines have better consumption than a diesel...
@TheCrankshaftRotator2 жыл бұрын
At 160 km/h, the consumption reaches almost the same level as my BMW 523i E39 :O
@SuperV8driver2 жыл бұрын
Very precise🤣 bmw 5 series, what engine? How old? What does almost mean🤣
@TheCrankshaftRotator2 жыл бұрын
@@SuperV8driver What engine? Are you kidding? I mentioned it already. About 9,5 liters per 100 km at 160 kmh. 25 years old
@SuperV8driver2 жыл бұрын
@@TheCrankshaftRotator yep smaller engi es are less ineffiecient if they are just creeping around, if you have to actually use the power they are as inefficient as older ones, at around 20%. 10-20% oberall efficiency, whats actually really bad, so only while "not using" the power they are better, and 90% of the time except at the german autobahn at speeds over 130kph thats the case.
@TheCrankshaftRotator2 жыл бұрын
@@SuperV8driver I know, I'm a mechanic. But when I drove with lower load, it consumes just about 6 liters (100 kmh). I'm quite satisfied with that engine.
@stefan_jank2 жыл бұрын
My A7 consumes around 7.5 liters at 160kmh cruising speed
@net.observer2 жыл бұрын
~2100rpm in 6th at 100kmh. Same as the old 1.4TSI 110kW and 1litre less.
@goldendlolig82372 жыл бұрын
110kw ???
@leocompany2 жыл бұрын
@@goldendlolig8237 110kw = 150HP
@goldendlolig82372 жыл бұрын
@@leocompany is it the turbocharged and supercharged engine ?
@jacobofernandez55172 жыл бұрын
Yo hago entre 5 y 6 litros ciudad carrera y comarcales máximo a 120,mínimo un viaje 3 personas con autopista y puerto de montaña media de 4.8 a 125km hora y puerto del 18 por cierto subiendo alege
@sgv27532 жыл бұрын
Like !
@georgeionescu96662 жыл бұрын
What size are wheels 16 or 17
@JocarShorts2 жыл бұрын
16 :)
@georgeionescu96662 жыл бұрын
@@JocarShorts Thanks. Have golf 7.5 with this engine but 116hp and have the same consumption at 120km/h with 16rims, 5.0- 5.1. But i change the rims with 17 and my fuel consumption increase 5.5litres at 120km/h on hiway with clima set at 22-23 degres. But the new wheels with michelin primacy 4+ 225/45r 17 and rims oz alleggerita 8x17 with only 7.3kg per rim and tire have 8.8kg = 16.1-16.2kg per wheel versus old set up r16 with contiecontact5 17.4kg, and still have increase fuel consumption on haway with 0.4l-0.5l
@JocarShorts2 жыл бұрын
@@georgeionescu9666 very interesting 🤔 I think it’s because of the width. The different tire width 205 vs 225 could maybe affect the consumption up to 0.5l. But it’s just a guess.
@georgeionescu96662 жыл бұрын
@@JocarShorts Yes i finck so, the width is probably the cause
@DrewKaplan2106 Жыл бұрын
13L/100km bei 200…. Da weiß ich schon warum ich 340i und m550d fahre 😂