Joel David Hamkins on Gödel's Incompleteness, Set-Theoretic Multiverse & Foundations of Mathematics

  Рет қаралды 1,795

Rahul Sam

Rahul Sam

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 11
@StephenPaulKing
@StephenPaulKing 11 ай бұрын
I am very interested in opinions on the Axiom of anti-foundation and the work of Jon Barwise. Can we imbed ZFC in some version of non-well founded sets?
@RahulSam
@RahulSam 11 ай бұрын
Interesting... I'm not familiar with the work of Jon Barwise. Any good reading material you recommend?
@GuillermoPSKrebs
@GuillermoPSKrebs Ай бұрын
Awesome!
@RahulSam
@RahulSam 29 күн бұрын
Cheers!
@BuleriaChk
@BuleriaChk 8 ай бұрын
Godel expresses wff's in odd numbers every number is prime relative to its own base n = n(n/n)=n(1_n) (primes do not include division by other numbers) Goldbach's Conjecture "every even number is the sum of two primes" n + n = 2n Godel's expression does not include even numbers in his defintion of wff's - they are therefore "undecidable" (o + e) = o is always odd so is undecidable because of the existence of even numbers (e+e) = e (o and e are sets of numbers). Note that the product of differing powers of prime numbers is zero, since the graphs of x^m and x^n only intersect at x = 0 so (x^n)(x^m) = 0. (the reason powers form a basis in polynomial space). Proof of Fermat"s Theorem for Village Idiots c = a + b c^n = [a^n + b^n] + f(a,b,n) (Binomial Expansion) c^n = a^n + b^n iff f(a,b,n) = 0 f(a,b,n) 0 c^n a^n + b^n QED Pythgoras is wrong, Fermat is correct even for n = 2. Someone go tell the physicists (Especially Einstein and Pauli) and also for multinomials (tell the cosmetologists..) (Hint: Wiles had to use modular functions, which are only defined on the positive half of the complex plane.) there are no negative numbers: -c= a-b, b>a iff b-c=a, a >0, a-a = 0, a=a if there are no negative numbers, there are no square roots of negative numbers. The ""complex" plane is affine to the real plane (1^2 1, sqr(1^2) = 1 2qr(1) (Russsell's Paradox; a number can't both multiply and not multiply itself). more on this on the physicsdiscussionforum (dot org)
@RahulSam
@RahulSam 8 ай бұрын
I will have to read this comment more carefully. Thanks. Bookmarked!
@BuleriaChk
@BuleriaChk 8 ай бұрын
@@RahulSam If you want to discuss it further, let me know. I'll buy the beer and pizza!
@98danielray
@98danielray 7 ай бұрын
​@@RahulSamyou cant even distinguish this as crankyness?
@BreezeTalk
@BreezeTalk 11 ай бұрын
Mhm okay I’ll give it a chance.
@RahulSam
@RahulSam 11 ай бұрын
Please do 😉
The Gödel incompleteness phenomenon
1:19:48
Joel David Hamkins
Рет қаралды 18 М.
Their Boat Engine Fell Off
0:13
Newsflare
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
She wanted to set me up #shorts by Tsuriki Show
0:56
Tsuriki Show
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Joel David Hamkins: Philosophy of mathematics and truth
1:26:30
Matthew Geleta
Рет қаралды 4,9 М.
Math's Fundamental Flaw
34:00
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
COURTNEY FUGATE - RENEW18 Open Research Seminar 4
1:55:02
Terence Tao at IMO 2024: AI and Mathematics
57:24
AIMO Prize
Рет қаралды 652 М.
Gödel's Incompleteness (extra footage 1) - Numberphile
13:24
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 373 М.
Is Kant the Enemy of Metaphysics?
13:40
Rahul Sam
Рет қаралды 32
Michael Potter: The Rise of Analytic Philosophy
1:41:06
Rahul Sam
Рет қаралды 1,5 М.
Imaginary numbers aren't imaginary
13:55
Ali the Dazzling
Рет қаралды 215 М.
Gödel's Argument for God
27:57
Daniel Bonevac
Рет қаралды 126 М.
A (very) Brief History of Kurt Gödel
16:36
moderndaymath
Рет қаралды 41 М.