Make your Greenback Reissue sound JUST LIKE the ORIGINAL!

Today we'll sand down the paper cone of a Greenback speaker until it almost falls apart! This unorthodox method actually makes the harsh sounding Celestion Greenback G12M25 Reissue sound really close to the Original Pre Rola Celestion Greenbacks with Pulsonic cones. Unfortunately it may also likely ruin the speaker. ;-) Let's go!

[@klontart]

Product idea for Celestion: relic’ed speakers in mild, medium and heavy variations.

[@JohanSegeborn]

They should at least start offering pre broken in speakers. Cheers

[@bradhargis2261]

Yeah so they can charge an extra $70-$100 for a sandpaper speaker. When their speakers are already ridiculously overpriced.

[@bimwopbarn47]

great idea

[@rjake61]

The cone sanding definitely made it sound closer to the real thing! It softened the reissue up quite a bit.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Glad to hear it

[@isaacjohnson.]

Love to see you chasing tone in these experiments. Sounds great both ways. Slightly sanded seems to retain a little more bite, and the heavily sanded sounds like you got the classic recorded tone from records but as a live version. Love the playing on the jam at the end.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Isaac, it’s great to hear that! Cheers

[@drewpennell8362]

I don't know, I think I personally like it better only slightly sanded and not all the way. Yes it is warmer when it's sanded all the way down, but I feel like you're sacrificing a lot of top-end. When I personally use a Greenback cabinet I want a marshall head cracked so it is as bright and loud as possible. Either way, sounds great and always love the videos

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Drew!

[@jasonsapp792]

+1

[@blacktoothgriner]

Treble booster.

[@drewpennell8362]

Shouldn’t need a treble booster with greenbacks. Especially if you have single coil pickups, I mean don’t get me wrong personal preference of personal preference. I’m just saying in general that batch of ingredients definitely would be extremely bright

[@ryans9029]

@@blacktoothgriner treble booster is kinda a misnomer. Bad name for what it does.

[@batheavy2834]

It’s creamed off all the fizzy, crisp packet top end. Sounds like a more off centre mic position but also not dull or clothy sounding. Pretty 👍

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks!

[@SamLibman]

*Sandpaper prices skyrocket. Haha. In all seriousness, that affected the tone way more than I thought it would, and in the best way. Definitely gets the “warm nasality” that you mentioned. Beautifully done my man.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Cheers Sam! ;-)

[@daveanderson5680]

The vintage speaker still wins my vote. I’d like to hear how the vintage speaker cones tone has changed since it was new...that’s a challenge for you Johan

[@hdspringer98]

Always interesting, always great playing, always incredible tone no matter what you're experimenting with. Amazing how close you got to the original.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Glad to hear that, thanks!

[@mgalbu]

Awesome video Johan! It really sounds very close to the original. What surprised me was that the deep sanding made the RI Lead cone sound more like the Pulsonic 55Hz cone in the video. Love these tone chasing experiments!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks man, yeah that’s was indeed an unexpected result. Cheers

[@yetanotherbassdude]

It almost feels like the Pulsonic tone is somewhere between light sanding and all the way down. The big thing that the original had was that there was still clarity. The top end was still present, but much sweeter than the reissues, and the bottom end stayed tight, whereas the all the way cone started getting a bit farty and wooly. Definitely going to try sanding a reissue to see what I can get from it, though! Cheers as always Johan for another fantastic video!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Glad to hear it, Cheers!

[@AmpAHolic-wn6mr]

I prefer the lightly sanded version myself. Perhaps somewhere in between would be the best of both worlds. It’s apparent the more you sand the more you change the frequency response of the speaker. Knowing exactly when to stop would be trial and error. Your definitely onto something.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks

[@jakewilliams5796]

I have always had an idea that each individual fiber that makes up the paper of a cone has a small amount of vibration from fiber to fiber, i swear i can hear the " gain " or " distortion " of an amp and the pickups more clearly through old aged cones, and in this experiment the more you sand the more clearly i can hear the " break up " sounds. More great stuff please, i love it.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Jake!

[@nickbenjamin6527]

Add some grit to your tone: 180 grit 🤘

[@JohanSegeborn]

;-)

[@auntjenifer7774]

I remember this video @Johan Segborn A better way to do this is spray the cone with water very fine mist. A humidifier works best but when you do this to can not touch the paper as it will likely rip. But you just saturated the cone with fine moist mist and then let it dry. It should really clear up the bass and high end and the mid range should be more open as well. It's an old trick to get the thick cones off brand new speakers to be more like the vintage played in ones. Plus the pulp was mashed up finer for those old cones in the vintage speakers. These old speakers have cones that have worn thin from being used a bunch and being loaded up in the back of trucks and getting wind and rain on them at shows, it shows if you look for it.

[@pensive_]

Very good info thanks. I like the completely sanded down version. Sounds quite like my Celestions I had in the early 80s.

[@79Pedrosanchez]

HI Johan, the way you explained during the intro just amazing. It totally make sense in way but it made me laugh quite a bit. Looking forward to watch the entire thing. Excellent idea. ' only try this if you can afford to scrap the speaker...!!!

[@patricksommer3971]

That all the way sanded down is a great sound.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Patrick!

[@Folkert123]

You are a genius johan! You just cracked the code

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Folkert! ;-)

[@christophergregory1205]

I liked it better just slightly sanded, but I prefer more treble in general. Sounded good either way!

[@RefereeDahmer]

Glad it’s you experimenting and not me (which would undoubtedly be a disaster)! Another great video! In all honesty, nothing sounds like the original. Still, a marked improvement (to my ears), but “tone” is just soooo subjective. Keep up the awesome work!!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks! Glad you like it :-)

[@paullaughton3440]

Thanks Johan, definitely hear the differences. Appreciate your passion and willingness to try (and share with us)!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks man!

[@creamygoodness3018]

I liked the 'slightly sanded' sound. It wasn't quit the tone of the vintage speaker but it sounded good

[@silentweapon338]

Bottom Line is Celestion NEEDS to figure out how to make the current cone thinner or "rediscover" the old formula!

[@JohanSegeborn]

I’m actually pretty sure they know know how to build a speaker that sounds more or less exactly like the original. However, since the current reissues, which probably are built to a great margin, are accepted by most customers, there is no business case to introduce a better speaker. That would only undermine the sales of the current Greenback RI. What I don’t understand is why no one else introduces an authentic sounding Greenback clone.

[@MC-bi8qw]

I think there was a speaker brand which claims to do authentic reissues but i forgot the name

[@chanceterrill5346]

@@MC-bi8qw scumbacks m75 pvc with the kraft paper is supposed to spot on

[@Dagger_323]

Johan Segeborn The current Scumback all sound very close to original Greenbacks. The ones you demo’d before were the older Weber-era Scumbacks, which were considerably inferior. I highly recommend checking out the newer Scumbacks, I think you would be pleasantly surprised.

[@surfthejapstrat7010]

surfin vampire 666 warehouse guitar speakers or hellatone

[@middle_pickup]

Okay now that was interesting. Really great video for showing people who don't know what speaker distortion is.

[@anthonydratnal1870]

Hopefully Celestion can start making thinner cones on a large scale and produce a much closer Greenback reissue!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Yeah, or at least find a thicker paper with these properties. Cheers

[@thorinbane]

The problem is the longevity of the speaker at that point. Like Johan said, they need to improve the cone properties without thinning the paper too much.

[@rareform6747]

Will warp over time and split .

[@frantisca]

Hi Johan: incredible tone difference: the sanded down cone really sounded vintage, mellower: you should be permanent member of the Celestion R&D as their Einstein !! 🤣 Great vid and inspired playing ! 🤘🏻

[@TheChipMcDonald]

Interesting! Along these lines though, I think trying to replicate the compliance/mass of the speaker might be achieved with 1) treating the cone with a dilute HCL or H2SO4 solution to partially digest some of the cellulose - replicating aging, but then to 2) retain some of the stiffness by spraying the back with a lacquer. Furthermore the 3) breakdown of the coil glue maybe bake it? Then try 4) reducing the magnet coercivity, hit it with a hammer, or try to demagetize it with a field coil and 5) replicate aging of the surround, sand it Another thought would be could you accelerate the aging by putting the cone under intense UV (like from an old press-plate photo resist burner) ... But I think aging the spider and the dust cap would hold the most reward for effort. Making the spider lighter but stiffer,l... Or experiments with the dust cap in my "testing" makes the biggest difference...

[@angelobouhoutsos3060]

Interesting! What do you do to dust cap and just in case where do you get these implements?

[@dougb5028]

Yes, @TheChpMcDonald please try these ideas and report back!

[@alanst.4417]

Ha the ultimate greenback alchemic experiment! And voila the holy grail of tone is reinvented with a piece of sandpaper! You're becoming a real mystic, Johan ;-) Thanks for the side by side comparison. And I really love those riffs!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Alan, Glad to hear it! :-)

[@funkyjones]

I was surprised how warm the "all the day down" speaker sounded. Big difference!

[@danieltv123]

Sanded down slightly is just perfect!

[@kickinvideo333]

Wow!! Amazing transformation!! I'm going to rough up my Celestion G12C "Hendrix" speakers to tame them as their very bright when compared to my Celestion '68 G12M 1221 Pulsonics that are truly a benchmark speaker

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks! Yeah G12C is a good speaker but stock it’s a bit stiff. I prefer it to the G12M RI

[@kickinvideo333]

I've had the honor to play on 25w & 30w vintage Lead & Bass Pulsonics and they're all just terrific. Vintage Creambacks, Blackbacks and G12-65s are also terrific but with distinctly noticeable growl & range variations - depending on what you're looking for. The best I've heard in a modern speaker are the Creamback reissue and the Scumback M75 PVC 65w - but this sandpaper trick is amazing!!

[@JohanSegeborn]

My favorite modern speaker is the Fullback

[@kickinvideo333]

Johan Segeborn Fullback wow that's a monster! I saw your video on it and it's very impressive! This sandpaper trick is a stroke of genius, Johann! I'm going to set up my speaker on a potters wheel to try & stay even & concentric. Did you use coarse, medium or fine grit?

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks, I used grit 60

[@reno145]

Celestion should do a signature speaker for you, in varying amounts of sanding using the new, patented "Croc-o-Dial Cone Conditioning System" Mild = "Check it out" Moderate = "Cheers" Full on = "Let's Go!"

[@JohanSegeborn]

Hahaha! I bet they’d be thrilled ;-)

[@ortanchibiri]

Slightly sanded sounds very good, but all the way is noticeably better (to me). The rest of the gear also helps, yeah, and your playing. You've got great taste for this kind of stuff.

[@gordontubbs]

A little bit sure goes a long way! Nice.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks man ;-)

[@dietmarsimon]

Indeed very effective ! I sure will try that with a spare speaker laying around.

[@russelw.6288]

Great idea. Liked the soft sound

[@annunacky4463]

So what if I sand down an old Blue Marvel? Hmmmm. I got one to spare. My greenbacks are precious.

[@RayAdanREIMA]

Incredibly results! I have to say I like them both... But Sanded Down ALL THE WAY has a classic vintage warmer tone! I wonder if the same acoustic effect can be reached on Celestion's Vintage 30 or Heritage. Thanks for sharing dear friend! Cheers!!!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks my friend! I’ll do a video where I look at G12T75 and V30 as well soon.

[@RayAdanREIMA]

@@JohanSegeborn Amazing! I can't wait! Specially due I have a 4x12 with them. Warm regards!

[@FrallaN024]

Ska prova det här själv på en högtalare jag har, får se om jag får liknande resultat :-) Fantastisk video som alltid!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Tackar Frans, trevlig helg!

[@bfchris272727]

Johan, I used acetone on the surrounds and cones. Brushed it on w/a paintbrush. Gets the same results w/out sandpaper. Give it a try and a video maybe??

[@angelobouhoutsos3060]

Is the surround the dope?

[@kevinhicks3214]

It is very unlikely that the vintage greenback sounds different because it is old. In fact it probably sounds exactly the same now as it did 50 years ago. Why do I say that? Because people today pay crazy prices for original hi-fi and studio speakers from the '50s and '60s like Tannoys, JBL and Klipsch because they sound so good . Exactly like they did when they were built. I know studio speakers include tweeters and crossovers but even so if the driver frequency response changed this much over time then old hi-fi and studio speakers would sound rubbish and be worthless. In fact the opposite is true. The difference in sound is down to materials, design and build.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Indeed, the reason vintage Greenbacks are desired is because how they sounded on the classic records of the 60s and 70s when they were new

[@MrJLobster]

There are a few processes that affect loosening up the fibres in the paper cone throughout it´s lifespan. 1: movement 2: humidity 3: wear off. You´ve worn off quit a bit from the surface which was a real success! I thinker around with an idea of humidity and movement. Wet the cone with warm destilled water - play it half an hour moderatly - until it dries up slowly. Repeating the process 2 or 3 times should give you the effect without to much damage to the paper. What do you think?

[@BlaineLudeman]

"where does he get those wonderfully toys?" -Jack Nicholson .. good idea for reusing old crappy speakers ;p

[@JohanSegeborn]

Cheers Blaine! ;-)

[@TheChadPad]

Oh yeah, close, but the aggressiveness does get lost from the speaker a bit. Not really the treble per se, but the attack is softer. There is some treble lost though. I love the sanded all the way sound, but I think somewhere in between slightly sanded and all the way, you hit something big. You gotta think, those speakers get worn over time, and if you could replicate that wear, I would think with some coarse grit paper, you could replicate the sound of the speaker. Almost like relicing instruments, except this is actually useful!

[@kevinhicks3214]

How do speakers 'wear'? There are no moving parts in contact.

[@brianeno608]

I feel like with the vintage vs reissues, they definitely need to find a way to get close, seems like the final pieve of the puzzle lays in the cone and the cone material and its thickness or lack there of. Thanks for doing this experiment, i could definitely not afford to lol.

[@DavidGossettMusic]

4:15 that tone... 🤯

[@JohanSegeborn]

Cheers David! :-)

[@peterschmidt9942]

One thing you have to keep in mind is this is what they sound like now, not what they sounded like back then! I think I still preferred the slightly sanded speaker overall.

[@JohanSegeborn]

The reason vintage Greenbacks are attractive is the way they sounded when they were basically new recorded on on classic 60s and 70s albums. So any further aging beyond isn’t desirable. To me at least. Cheers

[@joefarmer7727]

I can totally hear a clear difference. My fear is that for a muddy sounding les Paul it could be too much. You would definately have to have a Great vintage open sounding les Paul. Like you seen to have.

[@cferrarini]

Probably besides the thickness, the question lies in the kind of fibers used to shape the cone, paper, fabric, etc. It yelds a different density and mallebility. Maybe Textile factory scraps. It would be interesting to look this fragments under a microscope.

[@SaintierSet]

Now imagine a 2x12 with one of each.

[@RecordingBlog]

Awesome as always and I actually liked all the different tones ;-) But what Mics did you use and how did you place them in the mix - I guess left close-mic, right room-mic with reverb?

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks! Good guess! I used an ADK Hamburg as close mic panned about 25% left and an AKG C414BXlli as room mic at 10 feet, set to cardioid panned 90% right. Added additional reverb to the room mic to make it pop out in the mix. Then I added a very slight amount of stereo reverb on the master.

[@RecordingBlog]

@@JohanSegeborn Thanks friend, that combination sounds amazing :-)

[@stevenmgyori3826]

Well done and thanks for sharing brother! Be Well and have a great weekend Johan!

[@JohanSegeborn]

You have a great one too my friend

[@marccarter1350]

I have that same tee-shirt, Johan. Been looking at the Levis ones you ware as well. Had a few years ago

[@JohanSegeborn]

Cheers Marc :-) Have a great weekend!

[@tonysplace8009]

A kind of transparency shows through on the all the way sanded down speaker; kind of like lifting the veil!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Yeah, it sound more high res than the other one

[@amateurism1]

Here's your next video idea: A diode placed before your speakers, Please check out these three videos: Video 2 of 3 is lessons learned: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpCUhKWCrrmnrKM Video 3 of 3 is allot of talking, its the discovery and the theory of what the diode is doing: kzbin.info/www/bejne/sGKsnHVvnMaHnpY Video 1 of 3 the tone this creates playing a Megadeath song: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKvSfYl5qtaDfac I don't have the ability to reach as many KZbinrs as you do, I want us all to have tone and I need your help.

[@FuzzyCorpsicle]

Stephen Toth Hey this is pretty interesting.

[@TheTurnerT]

I had already thought about whether moisture softens the paper of an old speaker over the years and whether this could be controlled by the user.

[@mul4you]

Celestion announced for 2020 the reisseu of the Johan Segeborn G12 Super Sandblast Special

[@JohanSegeborn]

Hahaha! ;-)

[@ER-yq1lc]

Very close to vintage. I wouldn't worry about VC rub as long as the spider is still in good shape. I think when a cone is less stiff certain bands and peaks can ring out better and have less dampening from the surrounding cone, less intermodulation "cone cry" and a smoother more balanced sound. Also you are slightly reducing the mms (moving mass) which will affect all the speaker parameters to a degree (in a good way).

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Erik, have a great weekend

[@Twildason]

I think you have discovered another tone descriptor. I like my tone "sandy".

[@JohanSegeborn]

Hahaha! 🤘

[@TFMB]

walking over to my sandpaper drawer...cuz Johan told me not to! heehee :p

[@JohanSegeborn]

Hahaha! Easy does it... ;-)

[@mikejamieson4252]

Best tone channel A++ Johan! 👍🎸🎶

[@hardrockindaddy]

Johan...another outstanding video thank you. Since your previous video about sanding the cones down, one of your commentators suggested using Acetone too. I have been doing some additional research and have read online that Ted Weber used fabric softener on the cones to break up the stiffness..I guess you know this too. Is this the doping method? Well I bought a pair of Celestion G12H30 55 Heritage Greenbacks. Since all I've been doing has been sanding for last 5 months with various builds...before I sand with 100 grit to 400 grit, and follow with a spritz of fabric softener, did you ever try subjecting these new cones to a signal generator for 10-20-30-40 hours? I seen some guys use a Hotone and a looper and then hit play for 8 hours a day? Any thoughts? You really kill it...at the very least I hope you are producing, writing and arranging ... love your riffs, and videos

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Jerry! Glad you like the riffs! Mats Frånlund and I have check out those topics in these videos Speaker burn in: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hmXKo3d7eMSIoJI Speaker doping: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qJPCk6ierZVklc0

[@GIBKEL]

Is there a breakdown of paper type, weight/thickness and manufacturing practices between vintage and modern?

[@orbitaljellyfish808]

Really enjoying the speaker mod vids! What about a fresh reissue but add a layer of black felt (from the fabric store) between the speaker cone and existing cabinet’s mesh to dampen the highs without altering the speaker?

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks, that’s a good idea for a video!

[@FACTBOT_5000]

Did the old speakers sound like the new ones when they were new? Hendrix wasn't using old speakers in 1969. Sounds great either way.

[@ryans9029]

People forget this concept. 59 les Paul's were just used guitars back then. And the speakers were all literally in brand new, unbroken in states.for the majority of the stuff we think of as the best of the best classic rock.

[@Splattle101]

Fucking madness! Great video as usual, Johan.

[@Heatfarmer]

sanded down slightly sounds great. If overdone, it seems to loose all the high end. But great findings, Johan

[@plexidust5101]

Hey , how about magnet swaps ? That seems like the next frontier . For example, start with a stock Celestion G-12- 100 watter and progressively go with smaller magnets. We always see the celestion catalog with all the different magnet weights or strengths, or partner with one of those companies like Eminence or Celestion to see if they could provide a 'Kit,' one speaker frame and voice coil, with several different magnet options. Seems like it would benefit them as well with exposure, while in your lab and on the youtube. Just an idea. All the pick up magnet swappers will love it ;-)

[@JohanSegeborn]

That is a great idea! Cheers

[@EdwardT9]

I wish this was easy, but the magnets are bolted onto the frame from under the spider. You Would have to recone it each time.... You could add a second magnet on top of the first held with epoxy,...that could simulate a bigger magnet. Start with a G12S and add magnets to it. You’re effectively increasing BL this way. But, Peavey did make a speaker with a bolt on magnet..but I think all the magnets are the same.

[@tommyboyce]

Your videos are great. thanks

[@chanceterrill5346]

Man after listening over and over I like the slightly sanded better.....there seems to be alot more articulation and cut n it no doubt would sit better in a mix being more punchy

[@josehmecozzi6417]

Consider the concept of the Neumann U47 wind screen and experiment with various speaker grills. We know Marshall grills do sound different so take it to the next level?

[@allenroberttucker]

I’d be curious what you could do with the cheaper speakers found in the new combos, or even comparing a sanded creamback.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Let’s try this on some hopeless speakers :-)

[@S1MN05]

I’m gonna try sanding my Seventy80 speakers in my 2x12. There is such a harsh top end in these speakers I can’t stand it.

[@kimhansen6384]

Let´s hear how it worked?

[@rarestpepe8835]

I bet those speakers are in thrasch can now :D

[@S1MN05]

No I just haven’t worked up the balls to do it yet.

[@yaniv-nos-tubes]

it might help a bit but i wouldn't bother. ide get second hand speakers . the 70 80 is probably the worst celestion speaker ever made ,it's meant to sound aggressive .the alnico cream is the opposite tone wise but it doesn't sound anything like an old greenback. creambacks 65m should be really good for you .

[@yallevereatenbeans2723]

@@yaniv-nos-tubes I prefer the 70/80 to the vintage 30 I replaced it with in my dsl combo, maybe the v30 just didn't quite agree with that small of a cab, but for me there was just way too much mid and it didn't sound great

[@TheBedroomRocker1]

Very cool! Killer sounds! Did you use a condenser mic in the first comparison? Which one is it?

[@MyICONIC]

Amazing!!! Will sell all my cabs and buying dirt old ones. Why cant they make this type of speaker? It sounds great!

[@vincenzoerriquenz2356]

Sounds surprisingly close to the vintage Greenback! But honestly I would be scared to tear down a brand new speaker! :-D I wonder if it could be possible to achieve the same results with a cheap speaker made with a very thin paper cone to cut corners by the company! Cheers!

[@EdwardT9]

Can I suggest a null experiment? Record, move microphone, replace mic back to where it should be, record, move mic etc.. I’m curious of the effect of small changes in microphone placement on sound. Is position within 5mm acceptable, or is 1mm needed? And make it repeatable using a looper pedal...which is less fun but more scientific. :-). I think these sound drastically different but I like both! I bet a cab with 2 sanded and 2 stock would sound great.

[@JohanSegeborn]

That’s kind of passive aggressive isn’t it? The cab position is identical which was made sure by physical references in the room.

[@EdwardT9]

Sorry, I’m just curious about the effect of these things, and I can’t do these experiments. It wasn’t meant as a criticism, and reading my comment again today I agree that comes across as P-A! I should have asked it differently. :-). I thought about it a bit more and I think that you playing the riffs and not using a looper does represent exactly what a typical musician would do to measure the effects of changes they make, and a looper would remove the “feel” a player would have in the room playing live with the amp- speaker. I guess a looper or plain old signal generator would be good if doing experiments and measuring with instruments, but the final cut has to be with a real player.

[@adamwatson6916]

The greenback reissue in my mini jubilee has a very nasal tone and it sounds very different from the many other greenback reissues I have experienced.

[@tonebender69]

Johan! You have to demo a Celestion G12C greenback. Killer!

[@JohanSegeborn]

Yeah definitely. I prefer it to the G12M RI

[@blakef413]

Further proving that "the tone is in the cone" and that Celestion really needs to take note of this video and do some real scientific research on getting the cones correct. The '71 cones and earlier are unmatched. Seems like by '72 the tone was falling off. I have a '69 G12M cab and '70 G12H cab and nothing sounds nearly like these- and they're still going even pushed by a cranked 100W Marshall.

[@daveklain4683]

I’d like it somewhere in between sanded down slightly and sanded down all the way I think that would sound best great job as always JOHAN CHEERS AND LETS GO

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Dave! Cheers!

[@jeffloucks2120]

Interesting. I'm thinking a greenback might fit in my Vox AC412 cab. Trying the slightly sanded route might be nice. Thanks for the vid's as always.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Thanks Jeff!

[@CaptWillard2]

I'd lke to hear a comparison between the marshall "aged" greenback in the 1974x amps and others.

[@therifflair724]

Have you tried this on other speaker models and brands? I wonder if I should try this on my WGS Reapers, Green Berets, Retro 30s, ET65s and Celestion G12K-85’s

[@blacktoothgriner]

Thanks, what a great idea

[@jasonsapp792]

Sanded down definitely has a "velvet" tone , lack of a better thought... The harshness or treble focus of the partially sanded down is noticable

[@superchampable]

What was the very last clip with the 2010 1960AX cab? Sanded or stock reissues?

[@slovokia]

I wonder what would happen if you tried spraying a fixative spray on the speaker cone - would the treble increase? Another idea would be to incorporate a passive filter network that rolls off the top end into a power soak device - that way your speaker lasts longer.

[@mikel3188]

To be honest I like all three they each had there own character. Which amp head did you use for this video Johan?

[@JohanSegeborn]

I used a 77 Marshall 2204

[@mikeanderson4770]

I hope speaker manufacturers are watching.

[@JohanSegeborn]

:-)

[@adamwatson6916]

That bridge pickup sounds fantastic is that the wiz? Sounds way more vintage than the burstbucker 2 . That bridge pickup has some serious 1971 live jimmy page vibes going on. I would love to hear that pickup thru a late 60s or early 70s 100 watt hiwatt head through a marshall 1982 cab with g12h30 55 h speakers to see how close that bridge pickup gets to the page royal albert hall tone

[@50gary]

Rather than hand sanding I would put the speaker in a lathe and turn the spindle speed way down then hold the paper and time the sanding.

[@Turboy65]

I have suggested to you that you should compare two identical speakers, one broken in, and the other fresh from the box.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Check out this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hmXKo3d7eMSIoJI

[@Turboy65]

@@JohanSegeborn He didn't even play test them. That's not very useful. I still think you should do the test yourself, with broken in vs. fresh from the box Greenback or Creamback reissues.

[@garyhicks789]

07:13 that one sounds mint bud :)

[@knowitall1694]

At : 1:28 you said: "It's gonna move like this, it's gonna kind of wobble" and made explicit suggestive gestures with your hands which continued in an up and down motion of your left hand. What were you getting at?

[@adamtwelve]

Can you please do a seventy-eighty next? I think it's the most complained aspect of the marshall dsl40c. I personally have found what I think is a great sound with mine by turning the tone knob down on my guitar and EQing some top end out of the pre-amp. Seems like a lot of people are simply yanking out their seventy-eighty speakers and throwing in a v30 or something else but I wonder if the ingenious Mr. Segeborn can redeem it?

[@JohanSegeborn]

Yeah absolutely! I think it’s a pretty good speaker though.

[@adamtwelve]

@@JohanSegeborn I think it's good as well, especially after it breaks in a bit but like I said many people hate the bright top end so I think you could have a pretty popular video if you sanded one and got good results. Just an idea I had, love your channel and have learned a lot plus get to listen to some tasty licks in the process 🙂

[@christiancircelli8159]

That's thing with greenbacks.........they take A LOT of time to break in and get that warm sound. With time and punishing the reissues with loud volumes,they will sound just like the originals.Sanding them down recreates the eventual break down of the paper over time.

[@moonkef]

Pretty profound Johan! So how does the vintage speaker achieve this timbre, does it shed paper over the years maybe? I'm totally doing this to my 4 x 12! What grit lol? 120? Guess i can experiment

[@siegfriedwashburn3484]

Hi, Johan! Sorry for being boring to tou, but really interesting, how it works? Thank you very much and one more time, have a great weekend! Z.

[@JohanSegeborn]

Hi Zigfrid, you’re never boring man! I think the sanded down cone is less stiff and lighter so it produces a thinker more detailed top end. Cheers

[@jan9]

@@JohanSegeborn When the cone is sanded you loose the outer compressed coating of the paper. Leaving the fibers of the thin cone exposed. I guess changes in humidity will effect the weight and tone of this cone a great deal more than mint cones. Like putting germanium fuzzboxes in the fridge, spending 5 minutes in the sauna with your greenback might just do the trick :)

[@jimmypage780]

Hey Johan , Im going to try this with one of my two greenbacks. Which sandpaper grit did you use ? ( By the way thanks for your videos , they are very entertaining and helpful👍👌