Johnny Depp Expert: How Amber Heard FAKED Abuse "Evidence" | Asmongold Reacts

[@frowy1]

This trial has really shown the difference between actual expert witnesses and people who think they are expert witnesses. Edit :) my opinion has become that they reflect poorly on the lawyers, who lets face it are not good. Presumably these are experts they chose, specifically because of their unethical and unprofessional 'flexible' approach to the truth.

[@artycharr]

"narcisists"!

[@valeriegeorge134]

True

[@tyler-qr5jn]

Expert wafflers

[@SchweetCookie]

This is an underrated comment. Totally agree.

[@michellescheron]

I wish I had the money for these experts. I would have a much better chance of winning with them. That's for sure.

[@JaniceMakely]

I seen this comment by someone "Never try to destroy someone's life with a lie, when yours could be destroyed by the truth!" I really feel for Johnny.

[@jennyjenga1929]

I love this!

[@dagoaat4777]

yup.

[@sekichdawn3913]

I watched this lawyer who specializes in body language. He said "Camille saw something in Johnny she needs to protect,and something in Amber she needs to destroy. Chills!

[@a_diamond]

@@sekichdawn3913 Yeah but it's not about Camille. Amber has no one but herself to blame

[@sharongriffin2673]

@@a_diamond the point is, Camille has a good insight into human nature, a narcissist doesn't.

[@lanvywynn]

Heard’s attorney: “You don’t have a degree in digital photo forensic, do you?” Expert Witness: “Digital photo wasn’t yet invented 43 years ago.” Translation: The witness is the OG of digital photo forensic which even the DOJ, FBI, and police use as an expert

[@blatantslander]

oh true

[@TorKelRa]

We’re losing, go to an argument from Authority, we need to discredit him.

[@chrisanderson1-66]

YUUUPPPP. This comment is 100% fact

[@candygirl7030]

Fact! 💯

[@mukhtaryaro8627]

Ahahaha very good 👏

[@kendallneason3645]

Brian Neumeister is the CEO of USA Forensics and has 80 distinctions and awards for videography and more than a dozen Emmys for editing, sound, and other categories. He has 42 years of expertise in the digital sector and has shot videos from helicopters for 14,700 hours. Depp’s team got the single most experienced certified forensic expert in the World to testify that Heard’s team sent him screen grabs and not pictures that came from the camera on her iPhone. She didn’t want an expert to be able to prove just how many edited photos she had on her phone. ( BTW the screen grab pics came from the phone that Depp supposedly threw off their balcony and destroyed and she said in her deposition that her photos weren’t available as she’d run out of space on her cloud. Yet she was able to provide old screen grabs to Neumeister.) She underestimated this expert. He is incredibly skilled at what he does. 😊

[@shirleyrusaw5181]

There are two favorite witnesses that I just loved that proved Amber was lying, Mr.Dennison redirecting Ambers witness about the same photo that was proven to be taken at the sane hour,the same minute and the same second and the same filing, the other one was Mr.Tremaine showing it was a set up great testimonies

[@AnnoyingTiger888]

Lawyer: *asks a question* Witness: *starts to answer* Lawyer: Your honor, he's not answering the question the way I want, this is ridiculous.

[@cloud1973]

LITERALLY-

[@danielkrawiec2493]

Hahahaha 😂 yupp!!!

[@jennifermarshall4780]

I loved it when he objected to his own freaking question. I was like what are you doing? Even the judge had to say you just objected to your own question. Oh yeah I forgot what I was doing Mr. Rottenborn. When that happened I cracked up. My husband is a criminal defense trial lawyer, the kind of attorneys Johnny Depp has. He has way more experience. 1999. He is considered the best criminal “trial” defense attorney in our state. Elite for the last 10 years in a row. When Rottenborn called it a mega pint he forgot to tell everyone that Johnny made that joke in the UK trial, but he didn’t pull it off. Johnny is savvy enough to turn it back around on him. Lmao.Mega pint 🍺.

[@roshasensi2220]

Witness: *starts to explain the answer* Lawyer: your honor, he's explaining why he cant answer my question the way i wanted this is so ridiculous.

[@gailtrotman5256]

@@jennifermarshall4780 This isn't that lawyer. We've never seen this guy before.

[@adarrm]

"I don't recall the question" is actually the biggest highlight of incompetence so far. Objects because he didn't like the answer he was being given, then "forgets" what his own question was when he was overruled? What a complete joke

[@samantham2204]

It will be used in law schools around the world on what not to do day.

[@edumalafaia11]

Exactly, its the first time I see a guy not wanting to have an answer for his own question 🤣🤣🤣

[@SLENDAMANN]

He was trying to avoid asking the question again, because the judge just overruled the objection to the answer. I.e. if you ask the question again, you're gonna get the answer you tried to object to.

[@0023Matthew]

@adarrm It was really his only move. Not a good one but his only one. The lawyers on Heard's side are actually quite good, but Johnny's lawyers have the "Might of Right" on their side. That is, they're defending the person whose case matches reality the most (not trying to be funny; it's just obvious Johnny's the victim here).

[@autumnleaves8553]

Mr N was a fantastic expert witness. He was not going to be intimidated by the bully lawyer for team AH. Infact the lawyer pushed him into giving way more information than was desired. Mr N was outstanding and super informative. Super!

[@markh4473]

This guy is a beast. You can’t shake him or make him contradict his testimony

[@noushinkhalehoghli6833]

Yes because he’s speaking the TRUTH 💙💎🙏

[@obin8910]

He's a true nerd. He doesn't give a damn about anything but the facts and details so all the BS just slides right off a guy like this. It was hilarious to watch the lawyer attempt a technical clash with such a seasoned professional. Another self objection out of desperation. I want this on BLU RAY. I'm deeply sad there's no season 2

[@Nissehult23]

Man i thought he was gonna go "I refuse to answer this question", but im not sure what couldve happened if he did that.

[@Muck006]

You should listen to his CV ... "filming from a helicopter when the cops didnt have helicopters yet" and other such stunts. The attempt to discredit him by asking the "you dont have any qualifications in computers, do you?" is also rather horrible and a sign of "artificially manipulating evidence".

[@Muck006]

@@obin8910 He was a nerd before the term was invented ...

[@thisismyinferno]

You can tell when Johnny feels like someone is being bullied or harassed because he physically responds. He doesn't like it. You see it when Heard lawyer is trying to verbally demean the professional witness.

[@selfrespectingfemale6811]

Yes! He was getting heated.

[@bonnie5969]

You can tell he genuinely cares about people. He physically jerks in response to aggression.

[@cthulhuhoops]

i just noticed that! he flat out stared at this bitch boy for a full three minutes, then TOOK HIS GLASSES OFF to do the same thing later. good on him; it's a silent way of showing solidarity and protectiveness towards a witness whose words are being constantly blocked.

[@michellestrachan372]

Yes I noticed he was upset. Bc this expert is a true expert and that punk Mail clerk pretending to be a lawyer is gross. Judge let me down on this one These are questions that are not yes or no answers and she needed to make the punk ask the question properly

[@Paul-dk5qq]

Johnny just needs to let his lawyers ask the right questions because this guy is a legitimate expert and unimpeachable testimony. Good pick of an expert No worries bro they got your back 🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[@kalevipoeg6916]

I LOVE that this guy actually says out loud what we're all thinking: "I understand that you're trying to control the narrative but..." NAILED IT. Right in front of the jury, finally, someone SAYS what's happening - that the guy is so CLEARLY trying desperately to hammer away at him until he says the one thing he WANTS him to say. Just sit down, little weasel. Just sit down. You're only embarrassing yourself more.

[@dickmonkey-king1271]

I don't understand these comments. The man - the team - has a job to do. They are legally obliged. Would you not want your legal team to do EVERYTHING in their power and imagination to defend you?

[@HebiSnake]

@@dickmonkey-king1271 Sure; but not by dishonest means. Make plea deals or show actual extenuating circumstances, or call for leniency based on some argument.

[@ACharmedEarthling]

@@dickmonkey-king1271 Everything legal and ethical. They've clearly crossed so many lines in this trial. It's beyond a joke now.

[@vwwvictor]

pretty sure this didnt need to be explained to anyone its obvious and its also the way these trials go, each party does their utmost to paint a compelling narrative for their side. u realize johnnys lawyers are doing the same thing except they just happen to be closer to the truth. i understand u want justice or whatever but these lawyers are doing their jobs the best they can what they have been provided, sometimes ur hired to fight a losing battle and u just gotta do what u can.

[@HerondG]

@@dickmonkey-king1271 From a defense point of view yeah, sure, but we get to see all the entire trial without an obligation to defend any of the involved parties, we get to experience how all of amber's lies fall apart with actual experts, and what do we see from her legal team? Trying their absolute best with any small opportunity to stop the truth from being said. I get that they need to do that in order to defend amber, but just because it's their obligation doesn't mean we have to accept it from a moral standpoint. The right thing to do is that they let him speak and show actual evidence or good counter arguments to defend her, assuming that's even possible in her case. You don't need to do dirty tricks when you can prove the truth.

[@leximari]

The tech witness doesn’t NEED a degree in his field because he is part of the standard. He has been doing this for decades, from far outdated technology to the present day. He is clearly a master at his craft. The fact that amber’s new lawyer thought he could win that fight was silly, and a waste of time - especially since he opened a HUGE door

[@Henry_6161]

❤️Brian Neumeister is expert in video and photography for almost 40 years... And also works for USA forensic...

[@leximari]

@@Henry_6161 he knows what he’s talking about! A true expert. I think he’s the most powerful witness in the case

[@Henry_6161]

@@leximari YESS, exactly agree... ❤️❤️❤️

[@Staudten]

Exactly. A tech degree from 42 years ago would mean jackshit in today’s standards when everything was analog back then. Absolute degenerate lawyer grasping for straws.

[@PrairieeGirl]

Well said. And having a degree doesn't make you a master of anything if you don't have experience to back it up.

[@SmugCanadian]

Honestly, the best part about this trial on a personal level was all the new information I learned from all these experts Johnny's team brought.

[@mamaharumi]

It's been a unique look into the industry, we don't often get this sort of peek behind the curtain.

[@RubbrDukki]

Fr I feel like my brain rot got cured by what I learned from listening to these experts

[@MrBeatYoutube]

True!

[@Sm0k3turt]

The real turd was the friends we made along the way.

[@anothenymously7054]

@@Sm0k3turt top comment

[@storm8716]

This man is the definition of : Kill them with kindness! Hold and protect this man he’s so humble and kind !

[@drugbustin]

PAUSE

[@mbvvbnn]

Which man? I just started to watching this video. I want to be prepared ;p

[@shirleyrusaw5181]

Notice Amber and Elaine constantly writing Ambers pen is not even touching paper.

[@RenegadeVile]

As someone with a masters in computer science with a focus on computer graphics, that line of questioning was absolutely infuriating. The expert was 100% correct in that the lawyer was NOT asking as yes or no question. It was malformed, for starters, and secondly, because there is no way to verify which, if any, photo is undoctored, you cannot verify the authenticity of any of them. You cannot say one way or the other, the answer is literally in the middle of yes and no.

[@TheArrowedKnee]

I don't have a masters, but just about to complete my Bacheror's this semester, and likewise i was growing increasingly frustrated about the line of questioning. It was clear the lawyer had no idea what he was even asking. And also yeah, you are entirely right, you can never with 100% certainty prove that a digital photo is authentic, since it's *technically* possible to alter OS logs, exeft, metadata etc.

[@cerebrosalphanite5146]

@@TheArrowedKnee what if you have the device the photo was originally taken on? would that be authenticable?

[@TheArrowedKnee]

@@cerebrosalphanite5146 Well, i'm not gonna pretend i'm a computer forensics expert, but from what i gather, that would mean could say with a larger *likelyhood* whether something was authetic or not, but i believe it could still be *technically* possible to alter something. Of course, it'd probably be much more involved and difficult since you'd likely need to alter the logs of the operating system itself etc, but as i said, *technically* possible. It's just the nature of anything digital really. But then of course, you come in to the realm of reasonable certainty. You can be extremely or "reasonable" certain that a file originally comes from that device, but never 100%.

[@iDeLaYeD_o]

I haven't trained or look at photo data often enough to understand what the expert were to say if he wasn't objected from speaking more yet I knew that question wasn't a yes or no answer the first time he responded to it

[@iDeLaYeD_o]

@@TheArrowedKnee From what the expert said, if you had the original phone with the photo still on it then yes as it can then be traced all the way back to when it was taken but there are still probably steps in-between if it was edited on a macbook or desktop

[@Kalysta]

This guy is an independent expert and Amber Heard refused to turn over her phone to him, and refused to turn over a proper image of her phone as well. This guy is a true wizard.

[@brianm.595]

I mean, her own testimony is "Johnny always wears rings" and then " he hit me in the face over and over" . The problem is that even when photoshopped there's no facial cuts or swelling. If you wear a ring, hit someone in the face one time and its guaranteed to feature blood, cuts, and swelling. She's clearly lied here in this case "and everybody knows it", as Asmon would say.

[@AbyssWatch3r]

mega clunky rings

[@BerkKayhan]

Just like how she said that those kind of injuries aren't as bad as you would think and heal quickly, which is absolute BULLSHIT. I broke my nose and It'll never look the same, I had a black eye for at least a week, and bruising for a month.

[@raaghavdatta7814]

ice reduced swelling

[@Anotherguy1st]

@@raaghavdatta7814 Yeah she had that magic ice, gotcha! 😉

[@jukebox1096]

@@raaghavdatta7814 not by that much if she was freshly hit or even a couple of daus

[@renoldrachman5479]

"You are not saying that AH changed the photos, right?" "No, I am saying that the photos were changed." LMAO Regardless of who changed the photos, AH used the photos to prove her "TRUTH" means the evidence is inadmissable and she has no proof.

[@gunghocg]

Fun fact: expert could not testify what alterations were made to the photos because AH team withheld evidence and refused to surrender the iphone she used to take the original photos. This was subject of a motion for sanctions filed by JD team against AH prior to trial. Now, we can all surmise why she didnt surrender her phone.

[@daCubanaqt]

AH claimed “she” never edited photos. Her friend IO is a photographer and would easily know how to modify XF data and how to edit photos. Hmmm.

[@liamalone2707]

She is an insult to all those, male or female, who have genuinely been through domestic violence. And those who still are going through violence.

[@frogscotch19]

yep, I needed plastic surgery on my eye from a single punch....she lied

[@deborahbishop3300]

AMEN ! 🙏

[@GrrillaFinger]

We know

[@cutetattooedgirl5322]

I agree. wow as a survivor of domestic violence she is the most evil.women of the planet! she's a hoax

[@carysfaerie]

An affront indeed

[@atraxian5881]

AH attorney: "what other data you used to formulate your opinion" Expert: *starts to answer* AH attorney: "objection, your honor, the witness actually knows what he is talking about"

[@serikazero128]

what the lawyer wanted was him to say only what data he was allowed, by the judge to talk about. But he didn't want to tell the jury directly that hey, we didn't want him to talk about this other stuff that formed his opinion as they are damaging for our client, so we only want to know based on what data he was allowed to testify today under our restriction? The only TECHNICAL issue, is that you just can't fucking ignore that there were OTEHR OBVIOUS POINTS, LIKE THE COLORS which influenced his opinion

[@vickilawrence7207]

😂 exactly

[@barbarakozlowski2642]

lol

[@gunjantripathi3340]

@@serikazero128 🤣🤣🤣

[@RMLLcrazy]

@@serikazero128 I still don't understand why testimony about other matters wasn't allowed.

[@hb4072]

I hope she doesn’t win this. She’s morally empty. She’s lied under oath. There’s no reason to punish him further and for what? Attacking cupboards after his mum died? Angry texts? Are these really so extraordinary?

[@mannymaurice972]

She’s horrendously calculated part of this is avenging men , it’s obvious . Pray he wins !

[@RetroGamingSweden]

Based on yesterdays issues.. I'd say JD took quite a hit when it comes to how he looks like. However.... AH has had that issue since the start. So I would assume that the Jury is not going by "one negative impact takes the ship down" road.

[@claudeyaz]

@@RetroGamingSweden did you see that one text message? I think the umbrella guy covered it, the message talking about Molly or whatever? That was an incoming message, not an outgoing one, so may not have even been Johnny's,. Honestly, this entire kisas so-called evidence has had a horrible chain-of-custody, lots of editing and other nonsense

[@conqueenfador5037]

Well they can still send him to a psychiatrist hospital for help against his addictions but yeah I don't see Johnny going to prison. But just because they send Johnny to psychiatrist hospital doesnt means amber will get scoff free because she was caught lying under oath which already will make you go to prison for like 7 years from where I live and also with all the other things like abuse and defamation. I will say she has a good chance for going to prison. I don't know for certain because I wasn't there in the first place when all the abuse, defamation and her making the fake evidence but I'm pretty confident that she did all of this because of all the evidence and her defense not being that great in this trial.

[@RetroGamingSweden]

@@claudeyaz Even if that is the case.. (I can't see how it's that way around due to the content of the messages tho).. It still shows him in a bad light. That however is, or at least shouldnt, be taken into consideration by the jury.. Nor should his snarkiness towards Rottenborn. It was a bit stupid of him to play that game with him but it is what it is. In the end tho.. So far nothing has been proven from the AH team about what the trial is ACTUALLY about. And I don't think it's possible to prove anything either. Rough case for them. Dr Cutty has also provided enough information to basically strike anything the previous Doc had said.. And that might be the hardest hit.

[@JRsBullet]

They knew the photos were photoshopped. How is her legal team not in trouble for using counterfeit evidence?

[@JJJJJVVVVVLLLLL]

i think the expert summed it up by saying it’s impossible to conclusively identify the original. There are enough versions to know it’s been messed with, but from what to what is not provable.

[@gunghocg]

@@JJJJJVVVVVLLLLL the reason the expert could not specifically outline what alterations were done was because AH team refused to surrender the iphone she used to take these photos (ie. The source/originals). This was subject of motion for sanctions filed by JD team against AH prior to the trial. Now we know why they didnt surrender, even when they were legally obligated, and just chose to be sanctioned. But it does kinda show bad faith on part of lawyers for me tho i understand they have an obligation to AH

[@JJJJJVVVVVLLLLL]

@@gunghocg Haha. That adds up. Thanks for telling me. The quantity of lies is so vast I could not keep up.

[@chivisisis]

Johnny’s profile 😮

[@kerryGunvaldsen]

If the client doesn’t tell the truth, then legally they can spin any story that will help the client win. Heck some people tell all to their lawyer. There job isn’t to tell on the person they are defending, it’s to create their clients defense to win. Unless they have concrete evidence a lawyer can spin a story to make their client look like a saint. Nearly all guilty people go in to court with a made up story. This is one of the reasons lawyers advise the guilty not to testify, because if they find you guilty they can then charge you with perjury. Not to mention it’s not easy to remember exactly details of a fraudulent story and a good lawyer will dig in to small details just to prove the story isn’t true.

[@anthonywarwick]

I'm a mathematician and have had arguments with lawyers before on technicalities and definitions. This was so unbelievably satisfying to watch.

[@Molly-y9t]

That's beautiful. My dad was, too. He didn't pass that to me.😢😊❤

[@victoriajohnson4420]

Amber needs to be held accountable for her illegal behavior, aside from her being a malicious, vindictive abuser. Specifically she needs to be charged and tried separately for perjury and falsifying evidence. The whole world can see what she did. If she is allowed to get away with it, it sets a very bad precedent.

[@ItsSVO]

Anyone making false accusations like this should be sentenced to jail time with no exception.

[@decorumlopez9147]

that would tear down how a lot of Hollywood works.

[@ranjinibhaskaran1204]

She should be thrown into prison on all counts for atleast 20 years n should be tried in US UK and Australia as well. Such evil woman

[@MichelleJohnson-tg5lx]

Agree!

[@ashbash635]

She’s has perjured herself so many times I’ve lost count. Nothing she says is in anyway based in reality and is an outright lie. She won’t be held accountable for any of this I know it. Surely making false allegations is a criminal act? She should be absolutely charged with a crime. That’s not even including the acts of violence she has committed that have evidence to actually support it like his finger. That’s a violent assault. Imagine throwing a glass bottle at someone and injuring them.

[@JK-nk3hb]

This is literally jaw dropping. No photos of the bearings or assaults. Edited photos of her slapping herself. No money paid to charity. Throw the book at her.

[@gottagofastest]

Civil case, can't jail her

[@JK-nk3hb]

@@gottagofastest ahh. Cheers for the info. Is the whole case finished now or will it end up going for some big finale somewhere else?

[@bignasty6395]

@@gottagofastest she could still be charged with perjury.

[@allenellsworth5799]

@@bignasty6395 But probably not. Rarely happens.

[@bignasty6395]

@@allenellsworth5799 oh I'm pretty sure she'll win the case cause the justice system hardly ever favors a man over a woman regardless of the evidence, but just throwing out that is a option.

[@KingR3aper]

As a Digital Imaging Technician (DIT) and grader for films I freaking LOVED this guy because he knows exactly what hes talking about, and it annoyed me to no end when Amber's lawyer was asking such a dumb unanswerable question as if its a "gotcha". It's like saying "Do cars drive fast? Yes or no" ... "Did you find evidence the driver drove fast intentionally? Yes or no?" How tf would anyone know that.

[@InfernoVor]

And it's such a shitty thing cause a jury who doesn't understand why he asks the question might get confused if the witness 'contradicts' himself.

[@hairymcnipples]

"what colour is the sky. YES OR NO SIR" I also liked the but when it became clear he was objecting from the basis of not understanding what was being said. Real good look there champ...

[@InfernoVor]

A more viable example of your driving fast question would be a statement to which he expects a yes or no answer. Because it's not about answering a question, more about making a statement with a question. It's acting as if it implies something if he answers yes or no, instead of the logical thing being that it wasn't or can't be proven.

[@shirleyrusaw5181]

They weren't allowed to say she was the cop I think she arrested her but truth wasn't able to come in too prejudicial .

[@Afton32]

Who in their right mind goes “I’ll just submit edited photos to my lawyers, lie to them and lie under oath about them…it’s fine” I keep seeing comments about her legal team but they have an unwinnable case. Their client has blatantly lied to them, the jury and the judge. You cannot defend someone who is so conniving.

[@mskyn150]

She thinks she's smarter than everyone.

[@ThatWildcard]

Pure narcissist. She thinks she is perfect and can get away with anything.

[@paulroy1903]

Ammmmmeeeennnnn!!!!!!! It's not the legal teams fault there client is a liar

[@lgar8309]

yeah i feel bad for her legal team, like what can they even do at this point? its just a case based on pure lies

[@Predated2]

People talking shit about her legal team do not understand the following: 1. it is their job to keep their client seem as innocent as possible, even if they are obviously guilty and all the evidence points against them 2. this courtcase has been EXTENDED. It went from a 12 day trial to a 24 day trial. So not only had her lawyers make her look innocent, they had to do so for 24 days. 5 hours a day. Trying to either discredit the expert witnesses that provided evidence against Amber, or trying to form questions in ways that the witness might (accidentally) agree with their statements. I would like to invite anyone here to spend 20 days trying to make Ted Bundy seem as innocent as possible. I doubt you'd make it past day 2.

[@chasitycaviness9057]

She wanted the fame, the money, the career, and everything else she could get from Johnny’s downfall. She planned this from the beginning. She preyed on him and try to push him to the edge. When he wouldn’t take the bait, she created a false narrative from scratch. She is vile!

[@iamurfriend777]

once she had that foot in the door with aquaman role via jd connection, she thought she can trash and discard jd.😂

[@Trrinx]

You nailed it !

[@Channeler324]

I disagree. Don't get me wrong, I'm not an Amber fan, however, I do have a good understanding of the personality disorders she's struggled and is currently struggling with. She lashes out in a really hyper sensationalist manner when she's hurt, mad & upset in general. While I'm not arguing her intentions were good, I think this was a result of her her ever increasingly dramatic tendency to try and out-lash Johnny & she went way too far. It probably felt really good at the time, obviously, hence her incessant attempts to stage and direct the drama but there came a point long before this when she knew she'd crossed a line and it's been about damage control & self preservation ever since. The thing is, it's gotten so big on account of Johnny fighting back, she knows everything is on the line & she'll do what she has to. Just my professional opinion! ✌🏻😉

[@kobakobakoba]

Yepp the lawyers gave johnny a ultimatium of what they wanted from a divorce settlement and if they couldnt be met they were gonna go with the abuse narrative

[@HopefulInterventions]

Exactly!

[@valroze1647]

I’m a photographer and I know everything this man testified to is right. They’re screwed.

[@indianacones5815]

I didn't need external confirmation to believe this wizard. But it's nice to have. Thank you

[@painoftheheart12]

I'm a digital artist and graphic designer. Can confirm

[@supernoodles908]

@@painoftheheart12 same. Can confirm

[@NoSlaying]

I'm an engineer, can confirm

[@Isaacaliali777]

I walk dogs … I confirm

[@Mrgeographyclass]

The lawyer doesn't realize it but the witness is actually helping him by saying it's not a yes or no question. He could easily say there's evidence of editing, but the lawyer kept pressing. The witness was trying to be responsible and ask him to reframe the question. But he was so thirsty for a gotcha moment, he didn't realize that both yes and no are truthful answers. He wanna be Camille so bad. All he did was give the witness incentive to burn him😂

[@zoltanvonbozzay9678]

Objection: they're about to say something that proves Amber lied, your honor.

[@TeamCadenceStamper]

Omg so true lol

[@andrew8168]

Thats actually what happened. To believe the people who own "our" government don't have a dog in this race is nieve.

[@experiencefloridawithjulie4568]

Objection, speculation!!!!!!🤪

[@jn8604]

Lmao reminds me of liar liar... Objection your honor! ?? Because it's detrimental to my case! (Sorry it's been awhile. I don't remember what the judge said)

[@gigiguido3845]

@@jn8604 omg lmao 🤣

[@Hersatz]

Seriously, this trial is a gem of knowledge from Johny's side. From the psychiatrist to this wizard, there is a lot of easily digestible and valuable information to be taken in.

[@burkhartlaw1]

The Depp experts have all been very, very good while Heard had to hire whackjobs.

[@rufatkupa4848]

THIS MAN, so much interesting stuff to be learned, not about the case, but just interesting things about technology and the human mind

[@ben_joven]

🧙‍♀️ ✨ 📷

[@vicky1rn52]

Hahaha wizard

[@rigkelkin2418]

Yeah rite… from now on people like her will not try to put forward such edited photos as evidence for abuse.

[@renatogomes5072]

Amber's lawyers to Depp's witnesses be like: -"Is today thursday?" -"yes." -"so do you agree with me when i say that tomorrow is friday, correct? -"correct." -"no further questions, your honor."

[@jowka11]

🤣😂🤣😂😂😂

[@barbbeulah7139]

😅🤣😅🤣😂🤣😂

[@AJMOFO1987]

So Wednesday was present correct?

[@charlottesimpson1619]

LMFAO

[@beckyb9659]

Johnny's attorneys:" is it lunch next? Wanna go to the sushi place we went to a few days ago? "Anybody have a nail clippers" ...

[@Timeward76]

You gotta love how amber's lawyer slipped up on the very last question of his crossex by conflating metadata and exif metadata. He opened a door that absolutely ruined everything the crossex tried to stablish.

[@marianneginalski7564]

A bruise is not a proof, one can self-inflict a bruise and then accuse someone. This is ridiculous.

[@biancafranco4857]

THATS WHAT I SAID !!!!!

[@Larissa-sd8uk]

She claims he did SO MUCH to her yet only has like one bruise or a small red mark on her face. He is not “the monster” no way

[@tomd96]

What's even funnier is that the supposed bruises were nowhere to be seen within the timeframe Heard specified by various different witnesses. Even two pairs of police officers.

[@charlespanache7047]

Would it be too far to assume she did exactly that? With JD huge clunky rings, the bruises must have been from another person.

[@latr1665]

I have hit my leg, knee or arm on things all the time and have bruised my skin... If someone beats the light out of you there would be significant swelling and bruising. Really ugly changing colour bruises

[@WalkinChristum]

I loved this guy so much lol, he is so passionate about his job. He was explaining with such a passion to process behind every aspect lol

[@val0r797]

yes id loveto work with him and learn from him, these are the type of people that are blessings

[@DeRockMedia]

@@demarcuscousinsthe65th is this a pathetic attempt of mockery?

[@demarcuscousinsthe65th]

@@DeRockMedia yeah

[@devilmay]

i love how they try to argue ACADEMIC DEGREE vs EXPERIENCE as basis to discredit him. worst argument ever. clearly a lawyer with a degree vs an attorney with experience.

[@shlongbongchewy]

@@demarcuscousinsthe65th turd?

[@telroak7754]

the most amazing part of this guy's testimony is that he wasn't even using his full power, amber's defense prohibited him from speaking about the chromatic values of each individual photo, which could help him explain more easily how the photos were altered and even with those constraints, he managed to destroy the credibility of the photos and at moments, even embarrassed amber's lawyer.

[@Lemosa3414]

This case is that last for the goofy lawyer lol

[@starrshine369thequantumshaman]

This is infuriating!!!

[@foxyturvey]

Same thing happened to the ex-TMZ employee guy. They didn’t want him to say that it was Amber who tipped them, but he was able to explain that when he was explaining how they can publish or post those videos. 1. Must be taken by TMZ paparazzi, 2. Must be from the direct copyright owner, and 3. From the owner. Lol

[@1onlypatch]

@@foxyturvey facts, the funniest thing is that he indirectly told everyone amber was the one to do it by saying they published 15 minutes after, so she had to be there and sign off the copyright right off to them at that time and that is why they could publish the video basically around the same time they got it.

[@normacolon9618]

If he woildve got to the chromatids I think it would be more devastating. Jury may not understand this.

[@aliciakurtz4858]

I appreciate you being protective of the lady that came forward that worked at the airport. These are the people who are upset with AH lies and making DV a joke to that community that has been so violated. I think it was very kind of the lady to come forward and say hey AH you can’t lie and get away with what you are doing. Good for her and good for you for appreciating this lady and defending her!!!

[@arsena5209]

why were they even making fun of that lady when she wasn't even doing anything bad or helping AH in any way, people online really think they can just do and say anything just because they're hiding behind the screen

[@axson8]

When a guy whose name is Norbert testifies against you on technical data, you know you're fucked.

[@TheCactuar124]

Nice copied comment

[@CaliWeHo]

😂😂😂

[@gossamerbutterffly]

LMAO! So true.

[@fionadaniel4056]

You tube needs GIFS at this very moment in time hahahahahaha

[@bryanward9502]

Comment of the day 😂😂😂😂

[@a24352435]

I am so touched by Johnny's witnesses, they show the world they still care about justice, not just keeping silent.

[@randomperson-up5vt]

@@shrubninja6444 hey if you can get paid and it serves justice in some way. That sounds like a good deal.

[@BassRowe97]

This is actually sad and scary how far a simple photo that is doctored can ruin lives.

[@anongamer5359]

I think you mean save since this is clear proof that amber is a lying bitch and Johnny isn’t an abuser

[@RankedZero]

words are power these days, and a picture is worth a thousand words, and if you hand pick those thousand words, the narrative can be pushed a certain direction

[@superglam5]

Yes

[@bluroseheart]

That's insane. I am glad she is caught in her lies and Johnny is being protected by a great team and loved by many.

[@femtoeclipse860]

Ambers team strategy: Let the young lawyer who is more in touch with computers and phones deal with this expert. Poor kid got a reality check and a schooling that he will never forget.

[@Tchud]

Wow, the contrast of "experts" in this case. If you watch JD's witnesses and experts, we were LEARNING. When Turd's witnesses and experts took the stand, I was going "who the hell are these people?"

[@horineesgaming7354]

Or i was like, are they here for depp or heard haha

[@yolandapaulino5952]

@@horineesgaming7354 omg yesssss

[@Bareybienesraices]

Clowns... paid clowns

[@nadiaetyem8511]

One word for her “experts” CLOWNS😂

[@kellyharney2385]

This wizard was my favorite wizard of all. He was a cool, calm, respectful, unfazed, bad ass, who turned the defenses questions against themselves, without coming across snarky or disrespectful in the least.

[@iamurfriend777]

throughout the trial,all of jd experts carry themselves really well like that. 👍

[@nitsuix]

Even with the judge ordering him to answer yes or no, the guy still refuses. What an absolute chad.

[@laughablelarry9243]

Yup, I love how he stood his ground. It’s like asking someone if a door is open or closed when it’s just ajar. Sometime there isn’t a No or Yes to a question. Like this guy said at the start of his testimony, many times lawyers don’t understand the technical terms, that’s why he tried to explain that before he started.

[@billylionisnotagoat]

dudes a bulldog

[@ThisIsSparta300]

So you're team turd?? Ur moms a Chad bud 😆 🤣

[@soylentgreenb]

”Have you stopped beating your wife?” ”objection, it’s a yes or no question, just answer yes or no to the question”.

[@88feji]

AH's lawyer made a mistake when he changed his question from "you found no evidence ..... did you ?" (29:43) to "you found no evidence .... correct ?" (30:06) And the witness is sharp enough to notice that difference at the end, which allows him to confidently say "that is incorrect" rather than "yes"/"no" ... The difference in implications between "correct/incorrect" VS "yes/no" are huge... "Incorrect" means its incorrect to assume there is no evidence that someone edited the photos, because thats still a likely reason why the exif datas are different. Which is precisely what he is trying to tell the jury ...

[@Cant_stop_thinking]

I was surprised the judge said "Just answer 'yes' or 'no" after he just got done explaining, between interruptions, that it is not a yes or no question!" It's like saying 'How did you get here, yes or no"

[@mdb45424]

Witness was close to getting in trouble by refusing to answer. She was trying to prevent that.

[@Cant_stop_thinking]

@@mdb45424 I was shocked. His expert opinion matters. Forcing him to choose an answer going against his opinion was wrong. I think the judge was awesome but it doesn't mean infallible. There were so many cases of various witnesses trying to get in extra information or their own narrative, maybe this seemed like yet another. But I still think it is wrong to try to force someone under oath to choose an inaccurate answer. Later it could be seen as a lie. Not perjury but enough to make the jury think he lied or wasn't a good expert . "You said 'No' to this question, now you are saying you won't answer?" "Now you are saying you can't answer".

[@shirleyrusaw5181]

Maybe the Judge doesn't understand as much as Mr Neumeister she should have sustained that question(t his picture doesn't prove they have been modified)he asked that question so many times

[@charminanderson6325]

Amber Lawyer started off by trying to insult this man intelligence by suggesting he didn't go to college or had a degree like this is the only way he can gain knowledge. Then that man owned his law school graduate degree and see him his 42 years of experience. That lawyer was no match for that man.

[@hunterdeloney]

As someone who is currently studying computer science I’ve really enjoyed hearing this guys testimony and was actually waiting for this to happen. It’s so frustrating to hear this lawyer try to manipulate his answers. CS is a very complex topic and any proper answer to a question requires a certain amount of extra explanation, especially if the person you are talking to has no background in the field. Also in regards to his questions regarding his degrees or lack of degrees, a large number of people working in the field of CS don’t actually have a formal degree but still have the same or at least comparable level of knowledge as someone who does

[@Lee-jc1gb]

Totally agree. Lots of people in the field were self taught as there wasn’t any qualifications you could get when they started or started at such a young age that they were way more advanced than the courses you can take are by the time they reach the age to do them. Lots of the OG’s help shape and write the textbooks for the courses people take nowadays. AH lawyer was trying to lock him into answers that don’t fully articulate the full picture of what is going on.

[@inamalcolmson9449]

Well said 👏👏

[@lowkeyarki7091]

Yeah, and it was clear from his explanation that the Lawyer's question couldn't be answered by yes or no. He's asking does he think Amber Heard edited the pictures, but the pictures he got are a copy of a copy of a back up not the original and has gone through an editing app. At worst those pictures are edited, at best their unreliable and compromise and shouldn't be treated as actual evidence.

[@DARWINZOO]

I told someone go check out sub reddits also she used her cellphone to photoshop? Er..

[@lowkeyarki7091]

@@DARWINZOO he said photo editing software, a lot of apps can add simple discoloration effects.

[@Izatrinigal100]

She is so finished. I understand everything he's saying about the pictures. That lawyer was being rude to block the truth but there's no way to stop the wizard and his truths!!!

[@beckyb9659]

He can't handle the truth! -circa 80s, Jack Nickleson

[@adidas7481]

"That lawyer was being rude to block the truth" . that's why we have judges but no, she didn't do a great job accepting all the crap from that lawyer

[@snatchadams69]

@@beckyb9659 90s but I'm locked in with you

[@coryt3629]

Kudos to the gentleman on the stand !!! What an excellent example of a true witness!!!

[@littlejaye1]

If this alone doesn’t prove this lady manufactured evidence I don’t know what does. She should go to jail.

[@Erickhetfield]

This expert couldn't have looked more professional, knowledgeable and correct. Everytime the attorney insisted on the question, he looked worse.

[@brendaoswald5006]

I love this expert witness! He won't let himself be bamboozled by AH's lawyer

[@croallure]

A small part of me was totally hoping for a My Cousin Vinny moment … lol Mona Lisa Vito : It's a bullshit question. D.A. Jim Trotter : Does that mean that you can't answer it? Mona Lisa Vito : It's a bullshit question, it's impossible to answer. D.A. Jim Trotter : Impossible because you don't know the answer! Mona Lisa Vito : Nobody could answer that question! D.A. Jim Trotter : Your Honor, I move to disqualify Ms. Vito as a "expert witness"! Judge Chamberlain Haller : Can you answer the question? Mona Lisa Vito : No, it is a trick question! Judge Chamberlain Haller : Why is it a trick question? Vinny Gambini : [to Bill] Watch this

[@WubbyPunch]

When the expert said that the ““ pictures that the lawyer was questioning him about weren’t even pictures, but image files or screen grabs, that was such a fucking dunk. Amazing

[@tgapj6968]

She never turned her phone in because it's self incriminating. She didn't turn in the evidence and I'm sure this is much more important than self reporting notes that cannot be verified by other witnesses. She still has the phone, like the guy said, ( people don't throw away evidence.)

[@durgaharidas5204]

I'm glad the witness said it out aloud for all to hear at 34:43 if you have evidence in a phone you never throw it away.

[@SeanKarleone]

Not only did he object to his own question, that he objected to from JD lawyer, with that he actually opened a line of questioning that was devastating to AH claims. Its ridiculous. I just couldn't believe him.

[@allegrac230]

In his defence... it's impossible to defend such an obvious abuser, manipulative person full of falsehood.

[@SeanKarleone]

@@allegrac230 understandable, but talk about throwing her under the bus.

[@classicandy5317]

Okay simp

[@eimaj3185]

Or he’s purposely throwing and making his money as he does it 5Head

[@bethm5791]

He buried them. He absolutely dismantled them. He was the best witness. Him and the tmz guy. BRUTAL day for ambers defense.

[@sangitapanday4906]

Not sure if anyone else has realized this! "The Photo expert's evidence today is more powerful then any other stuff!" 3rd generation backup photos were provided. The actual real evidence (Iphone used to take the photos ) is gone! Itunes - export does not have the history of the photograph (Exif data). She could have edited the the photos ->> uploaded them to ITunes --> > lost the phone thus loosing all the pertinent information regarding the photos ( Exif data)! IT (computer technology) - Data - Asian Jurors - this was gold. This expert was amaaazing - he did not give up despite of being bullied by Amber's wanna be lawyer who had no idea about Meta data VS Exif data.

[@rosehill9537]

This comment needs to be seen. Thats massive!

[@superstd]

they most likely knew meta data and exif data is different , thats why they are so quick to shut down him trying to explain it . they were just hoping the other side & the jury wouldnt notice , fingers crossed 😂

[@archducky7492]

This is a narcissist worst nightmare, being confronted with your own lies and not being able to lash out in aggression.

[@patriciagm7480]

She has content for a book with the notes she takes to not lash out 😮‍💨

[@truneilson]

Nope, as a narcissist she's just sitting there thinking this guy is stupid. This doesn't touch her over inflated ego.

[@jannyhawkins7135]

@@patriciagm7480 she better not write a book full of lies, she’ll get sued again

[@lejlaletic7591]

AH prob goes home and trashes her house

[@ggburg8118]

Amber has a ‘tell’ so obvious it screams,”caught in a lie”! She tilts her head, starts writing and she turns white. Also she crunches her forehead by raising her eyebrow.

[@ravenID429]

LOL

[@Staraxxus]

Psychologists from comments... "She raised her brow, she blinked, she farted, that means she lies".

[@roxweinzel7436]

This guy is a wizard. Powerful, smart and not easily scared. Her team looks like meerkats looking all around for the predator

[@faith2xxx]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@brokkenmeme]

Very nice and kind predator

[@ItsRayful]

bruh, he looked at the exif data of a file... "wizard" 11 year old kids have been doing that for a century on 4chan

[@samsauer1350]

This WHOLE trial would be different if Amber accepted even a drop of responsibility. If she had said she had made mistakes and was abusive, or even accepted that she had psychological issue and got some help, no one would hate her as much as we do now. But in her mind nothing is her fault, so why should she accept ANY responsibility for her actions.

[@AbyssWatch3r]

because shes " perfect" and no flaws 💀

[@bluey1695]

Yeah she needed to fall on her own sword a bit to win this trial but she couldnt let her ego deflate a bit to do so

[@DanielleBaylor]

I was just saying this today. If she had just been humble and realistic, she'd have gotten so much more respect and been seen as trustworthy. Instead, she's been trying to offer up this grandiose victim persona. Watching her lies being torn apart is satisfying, but it's infuriating to know she will be used as an example to now discredit actual victims. If she really was a victim of any type of abuse, she's destroyed any reasons to believe her

[@animula6908]

No, I think my opinion of her might be different, but she’d still be just as guilty of defamation even if she made a habit of accepting personal accountability in other areas of her behavior. But if she did take responsibility for herself, she probably wouldn’t have stooped to defaming a well loved and trusted public figure for personal gain, so she might not be on trial at all. So fair enough.

[@Anaizzz]

Narcissistic people don’t see any wrong in their lives

[@calmdown9094]

altering photos should be considered altering evidence. whoever did that needs to be charged.

[@Peanut_taco_muffin]

It was edited long before it was used in court , so tampering of evidence doesn’t apply here

[@BeReal769]

YEAH and perjury is too. If it was the average person they would lock them up...lol

[@roseannecaseycollinscasey-1269]

For sure

[@errant3]

@@Peanut_taco_muffin it is if you have the same picture slightly modified and presented as 2 different evidence

[@erinavery4577]

Cough,,,, amber

[@gailtrotman5256]

With all the irony in this case, you just know there was at least one computer expert/photograher on the jury who could perfectly understand the technical jargon used by this witness - like reading a child's bedtime story... and explain to the rest of the jury exactly what technology Amber or someone close to her used to vary the photos. Lol! ♡

[@dianeshelton9592]

I am no computer expert and I understood him perfectly. He explained himself very well and clearly for every level.

[@shirleyrusaw5181]

Four times Murphy asked same question th3n forgot it shows how her team lies throughout the trial

[@mage1439]

He objected to the guy literally answering his question directly. "How do you do a thing?" "You do it by--" "Hold it!"

[@Timeward76]

Because if he gets his answer, it'll only be worse for him. He should've tried the 'I forgot' shtick the first time that question led him astray.

[@kerwynbrat5771]

Remember she testified these were two completely different pictures taken in different light. She claimed one was done under the regular light and one done with makeup mirror lights. There is no way you can take the same pic twice in a row without moving a pixel.

[@gungal1]

This guy is very smart and I am proud of him for NOT breaking down and giving a yes or no answer.

[@koppsr]

Someone should've explained to Ambers lawyers, that interrupting a witness and insulting him, is NOT a good way of handling his job. Honestly...where did Amber Heard find these clowns?!?!? Did she just throw darts at the phone book ??

[@HelloYoutube89]

Through this whole trial what ive noticed and found out is what ever Amber said Johnny did, she actually did it. She said he photoshopped his photos yet she did. Johnny hit her with a bottle yet she did. Johnny punched her and abuses her yet she did. Literally everything is the total opposite.

[@KeLLaBee09]

Narcissists replicate others behaviors so.... 😆

[@m.delacerna7490]

It's like she's spinning her abuse to him like it's her own! She likes what Johnny has so much she even wanted the abuse she did to him lol.

[@hedgeoverheals7372]

I was thinking the same exact thing!!

[@HermansyahSuwarno]

Its called projection

[@OldGrey_Cat]

Or her lawyer didn't hire good experts to do the same thing. But if not, why not?

[@paulagriffithpaulag2]

This is like finding out before your eyes how someone murdered someone. I am so shook right now. This is so evil. She knows she's been caught. Her lawyers look so embarrassed. I saw Elaine look disgusted but she tried to hide it. And the other lawyer was looking around touching his forehead due to stress. Wow this is so epic.

[@ajwaddanwarr3409]

I know we meme to death about turds team but recently I started feeling sorry for them cause it seems like sometimes they are finding out stuff real time. Amber probably lied or witheld information from them.

[@paulagriffithpaulag2]

@@ajwaddanwarr3409 Yep you can tell they look shocked. Its really bad. But that's what narcissist do they have no shame.

[@jimlynch8796]

Yes hearts lawyers will be lucky to work again she’s made them look so bad even blaming them for not using photos of real damage ? That deep did to her.

[@interroga-te-ipsum]

​@@ajwaddanwarr3409 So true!! They sometimes have no time to get their game face straight fast enough for the cameras not to catch their initial reaction.

[@chantelkay2597]

If I was her attorney(Elaine) at this point I would of stood up and said your honor my client is a liar & a fraud, I quit!! Lmao!! How embarrassing to have to ride this wave all the way to the end...fake photos, fake text messages, fake testimony, lies, lies, lies!! Your caught turd!!

[@katy4523]

This lawyer came for this sweet guy and that was his biggest mistake. By refusing to give in, this expert caused an unforced error that brought in a lot of damning information. If only the jury had the full motion and report...it's amazing, brutal, and shows how far Amber has gone to be a faux victim

[@starrshine369thequantumshaman]

I do think they may get access to the full report during deliberation

[@starrshine369thequantumshaman]

I think the only reason the judge didn’t dismiss the counter suit was because all the evidence hasn’t even been presented yet as we’ve seen over the past few days!

[@VecheslavNovikov]

Yeah, the lawyer was too focused on controlling the specific language used to try to get specific answers. The witness saw that and refused to play that game. Or rather, played it back, stating that yes, the data was altered (technically true whether it's maliciously by a person or automatically by the software.) Don't try to do this to people that know what they're talking about, they take it as a challenge and beat you on technicalities and semantics. Then it becomes personal, less about context and truth, and more about saying the opposite of what you want them to.

[@eyyojung]

30:04 this moment was my highlight from the whole trial. His answer: "Incorrect." lol Forced to answer a yes/no question that isn't one and loopholed it brilliant.

[@lyndseyclark9067]

I’m going to school for digital studies right now and hearing this guy talk is like music to my ears! I love how AH’s lawyer keeps trying to catch him on a technicality, but he’s talking to an OG in the field. The man was fighting a loosing battle from the start.

[@moragabriel9464]

I love how the Lawyer tried to challenge the Elder Wizard.

[@compostsmurf5519]

Looked like a game journalist trying go beat tree sentinel right out the gate

[@loreoftheasian4104]

First Draco TMZ now the Elder Wizard, yeah AH ain't walking out alive from this

[@lisacimarik7315]

Of every crazy thing I have seen in this trial, this is the most disturbing. It's sooo ridiculous that the AH team does not even have an original photo submitted. That is an intentional effort to trick or right out lie to the jury! Disgusting for real.

[@amyjobuchanan9684]

Yes! I just hope that the jury notices this also.

[@frida9380]

yeah because they would have an original photo of what? haha

[@Patricia-sn9ln]

Busted

[@carltonposey369]

I am hoping that they go after her for perjury! Amber does not need to be out in public. Her celebrity status does not give her the right to avoid prison-time!!!

[@pinstripe5487]

I've done criminal digital forensic work before, and it's so satisfying being able to look at the finest details of files and see how they reveal so much. A *lot* of people think you can hide things in the digital world, and the truth is you can't. At least, not easily. When you submit files to a team for a court case, there's virtually nothing that can't be found with enough scrutiny.

[@jelenajelenic9069]

I don't know much(nothing), about your field of knowleg,but i would like talk to you if you have time.👋👋👋☺☺☺

[@kidz4dayz]

The jury is going to completely disregard Amber’s attorneys examination of the photo witness. It’s totally obvious that he’s trying too desperately, and is clearly in a total panic. He thought he could frame a question in a way which would cause the expert to say “no, I didn’t find issues in the pics”, but they weren’t pics, they were screenshots - which were probably taken after they had finished altering them in photoshop. I truly believe they did that on purpose - in attempt to block the rabbit trail.

[@peachdreams]

and he said the screenshots were from a Microsoft pc! meaning they uploaded them to a second computer, because Amber edited her photos on an apple computer!

[@cablefeed3738]

@@peachdreams Actually it is from a Mac because they are using a Mac software to edit it.

[@covertrabbit8867]

Never underestimate the stupidity of the general public.

[@peachdreams]

@@cablefeed3738 they did both! He mentions that they took screenshots and the metadata shows it to be from a Microsoft jpg, not apple's jpeg file type (which means they edited some on apple computer, and also did further editing on a windows computer then took screen-shots (as that doesn't have the photo history)

[@anagramconfirmed1717]

@@Edwin-pq6dg are you asking or telling?

[@SpiceCh]

So, in conclusion, Amber and her lawyers are: 1. using evidently and demonstrably forged evidence. 2. taking evidence out of context to make it appear supportive of Amber's case. 3. calling in paid expert witnesses who are misrepresenting correlation as causation. 4. calling in paid expert witnesses whose work is evidently and demonstrably not meeting ethical and professional standards. 5. deliberately attempting to misrepresent statements and shut down attempts at elaboration from witnesses during cross-examination because the truth doesn't benefit them. 6. repeatedly asking leading questions and, following an objection, rewording their question with the witness now having been prompted with what answer they should give. 7. trying to discredit witnesses who say something they don't like, not by pointing out the flaws in their arguments or methodology (because they generally can't find any), but by smearing their character. (Thanks GhostofPaulWalker for pointing that out). 8. trying to frame all of the above as indisputable evidence in favor of Amber when all of it falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. Meanwhile, Johnny's team is providing dozens of independent and unchallenged testimonies as well as demonstrably true evidence in support of his case. With only 1 hour left, the only way I see Amber's team proving she was abused is if they've got a slew of video recordings of Johnny violently assaulting Amber on several occasions up their sleeve.

[@PineappleBaconPizza]

But....what if anything? We can rely on hersay your honor 😂😂😂

[@brradv3552]

I wouldn't be surprised to see a staged video of some random JD lookalike pretending to hit miss turd... 😂

[@richeyd12]

Perfect

[@chellnz]

Except her one our left is to rebutt Johnny's case against her counter-suit not to bring in more evidence that Johnny did in fact abuse her. Her best chance there is to find some actresses out there as bad as her that have somehow turned a supporting role into many staring roles. Prior to this case if you had asked me who the female star of Aquaman was I probably have said Nicole Kidman... oh and there was some chick with a bad red wig.

[@classicandy5317]

Welcome to Americas legal system 🤦‍♂️

[@ruthcollantes6901]

Great catch, Zack. The expert is REALLY an expert. He's so cool. Invert it, shake it up, rewind it, lanbirynth it... It still will end up as true evidence of lies.

[@calebenos808]

Much respect to this guy! He didn't waver at all when he knew the lawyer was trying to control the narrative.

[@Kosraean.kianarose]

He even said that out loud 😂

[@kowalewicz2554]

The funny thing is, this wouldn’t have mattered if she just said ”Yes, I edited them so the injury is more visible, but you can still see it, it’s still there”. But she had to say she hadn’t touched any of the photos at all, that they weren’t edited at all. Jesus this woman… Imagine if her argument was ”I’m not perfect either, we were both abusive, he still hit me and hurt me”. We would have all believed her! But she had to present herself as a perfect victim… She’s not a very clever lady, clearly.

[@bryanwoods3373]

The photos would probably have still been inadmissible. They should have provided the originals to a forensics expert that would have been able to provide chain of custody and processing to explain how they edited the photo to bring out the evidence. But like you said, editing isn't the real issue; it's how she presented the edited photos.

[@KhairulFadzlyAKarim]

She is a narcissist and thinks she is cleverer than everybody.

[@gildartcraft7110]

She say she didn't edit those photos because she didn't do it. She send all this "evidences" to one of her friends (probably someone who testified for her side)😅

[@ghostering8]

it still not work since no evident about dapp actual hit her, lawyers on his side still control the zone while she lie all this time and her evidence seem more and more fake though.

[@ramahonlineschool]

That’s what a non-narcissist would do.

[@elfhchan]

The judge is so refreshing to see, her cracking jokes says a lot about this trial she most certainly feels how messed up this is and tries her best to lighten the mood. I 100% approve of her and I am happy she is there to overlook the procedure.

[@templestark4779]

Judge Ito made jokes, too. Judge in Dahmer case made jokes, too. It means nothing.

[@elfhchan]

@@templestark4779 to you.

[@spunj]

Johnny's experts are actual experts. When they're talking about their field, I genuinely feel like I'm learning something new every time.

[@Jo-jn3dc]

If you are an abuse victim you have no need to edit photos of your injuries. While I am all for justice for Johnny I must note that the only reason he has this chance is because he has the platform to do it. Many victims go unheard because they are silenced and cannot afford a good legal team. The system is broken and needs to be changed for good. It’s more about money than it is about justice which helps nobody but those with power. Legal teams get lazy and do whatever is going to get them more money with less work. That’s not what it should be about. Everyone deserves a fair chance at justice.

[@zmanzizou1461]

True 💯 she IS a joke

[@estherdiaz9514]

I agree but I am thankful JD has broken the glass ceiling so to speak, in the quest to show men can be victims of domestic violence

[@ItsSVO]

This is why this case is so important and why Johnny using his standing to lay his life bare like this is integral for changing the conversation. Like Greg Ellis said, for Depp he had other homes to go to when she changed the locks yet for most other men they’re homeless in that same situation, justice and a fair trial should be a basic human right not based on money and celebrity.

[@awenda598]

Let’s be fair. She lied and every person has the right to tell their side. Johnny partners stole all his money so he’s broke. Further Amber said donating and pledging are synonyms and can be used in interchangeable. No. Double ch check with thesaurus. Amber hunted and took Johnny down with a sickening plot to shift her guilt with his. Too many lies. Do a background on her. She even changed her furniture while courting Johnny. Further while discussing the settlement she mentioned how she was duped out of 32million that she thought she deserved. That’s what prenups are for. Do you know how difficult and against a man’s pride to admit befouling beat up, especially from and “fat and old man”. I believe her illness doesn’t feel guilt. Obviously 🙄

[@traceydaizy]

I would love to have got justice 😔

[@BrokenTablesPodcast]

she wanted him to object at the beginning to force them to go over all the photos lol. genius.

[@CaliWeHo]

👏👏👏

[@rsdouglass4]

Very good times

[@White__Ink]

Dude this needs way more eyes. She didnt even say 'photos'. The witness did. And the witness knows they aren't 'photos' either, but this baits out the key word of photo to object to. This JD's team are COLD.

[@ayakid921]

The testimony could've ended at 7:00. I'm a Graphic Design Major and I know exactly what he's talking about. Every editing program leaves an imprint or signature on the photo you select in it that overwrites the camera software's or OS software's digital signature existing once the picture was taken in real-time. LMAO this is literally the biggest slam dunk I've seen in this trial with respect to falsified information from AH's team. You can't deny this man's diagnosis because it's not even that complicated. And if AH testified that none of those pictures were edited, she's fucked.

[@Willat544]

Actually, she did testify that none of them were edited. So did Rocky I think her name was.

[@PineappleBaconPizza]

@@Willat544 they're done for😂😂 amber and her friends and the worst of the worst. Johnny was an easy victim for Amber. She isolated him from his friends and family. She started moving her friends into his place. Johnny was pretty much trapped on an island where everyone else on it was trying to bring him down.

[@cahillrebel]

I’m a game dev graduate and I was face palming at this lawyer every time he objected this stuff. He clearly hasn’t done research or doesn’t know anything about image editing specifics. I’m like bro what are you doing lol

[@bonnierisner3304]

She did

[@Manuel_Bache]

If you are called _"Newmeister"_ you better not be adressed questions that way by lawyers...

[@deborahndina]

As a stylist, I can make bruise looking marks also. It does not take the rocket scientist to do that. I was a full cosmetologist license, and I know how to take different eyeshadows and make different colors to look like bruises.

[@saroporoggo]

Their defence against every witness is literally "so you want to be famous on TV right?" lmaoooo

[@socalrenegal9409]

Elaine is WEEEEEEEEAAAAAKKKK 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@wickedree3639]

The fact they tried to argue & discredit this Digital Wizard is crazy. It made them look even more moronic. They may as well have just said "Amber Heard is going to chew our ass again if we don't say something".

[@valeriegeorge134]

This man has worked on so many cases and big projects they are insulting his intelligence and challenging his integrity

[@nimatz3788]

When your lawyer is obviously trying his hardest to silence and discredit a witness it makes you look guilty AF.

[@queenbrightwingthe3890]

Thier only hope was trying to silence this expert but it failed and now the jury know the pictures have been manipulated with in a edit program. I bet Amber did not sleep well this night.

[@crimsonninja5090]

@@queenbrightwingthe3890 Sorry to inform you on this. She slept well for sure. She's a narcissistic psychopath who I am pretty sure still thinks she is right and won't get into trouble anyway. She has absolutely no remorse for others and would throw anyone and everyone under the bus if she has to, just to get on top. Just you wait for her narrative that her lawyers conspired against her and that the jury was biased on the case and that a 'FEMALE' is being mistreated.

[@Muck006]

When you dont have any facts on your side ... lie, cheat and steal.

[@Kitty-JuneOhSixJanTwentyFour]

Well that was what Camille did to Amber though, and at first it was funny but later on when it became extreme objections that they did not let her say anything, it started to not look that good either trying to shut her down. I did not enjoy it just for that fact, unlike many people in the audience of this trial because imho not letting her talk at all, was not that good of a move for JD team as if they were sooo scared of what she was gonna say. Not her fan, not siding with her at all. Just my opinion.

[@bailey4650]

@@Kitty-JuneOhSixJanTwentyFour Meds, now. Also kpop sucks, L

[@gaynorgregory2528]

I love that you banned the people who had negative shit to say about the airport worker. I absolutely thought what you did, that that lady didn’t do anything to dress up, get her hair done, or even put makeup on. Let me tell you, I’m a middle aged woman and if I was testifying on TV, and something that was all over the internet, I’d be dressed up and have make up on, and I would still hate to be on TV etc. That lawyer is full of shit, it was a cheap shot, and made no sense. Even if she did want to get on TV though, why would that have anything to do we’re her testimony?

[@Hephaestus_God]

The metadata sorcerer should have said "If I answer yes or no to that question it would be considered perjury" I'd like to see how the lawyer fumbles after that.

[@markom2928]

Bravo/a!!!

[@Triixster]

Starting by getting someone to admit they don’t have degree or didn’t go to college for a certain subject, just so you can diminish their intelligence is insulting and scummy. Trying to argue against someone with 42 years of experience on the topic (more years than you’ve been alive) is one of the most foolish things I’ve ever seen. The expert, despite the constant interruption and persistence of AH lawyer trying to control the narrative, controlled that entire conversation.

[@starrshine369thequantumshaman]

Her lawyers are dirty feeling

[@AgagsMoments]

As an Engineer I was always yearning to find out why the metadata of the images were never scrutinised. Glad they have brought and expert in!

[@rexerator]

It’s because ambers team refused to hand over the devices on time. So the judge ruled the metadata would be excluded.

[@danidan5286]

I know! Metadata it's so important...essential on this cases

[@queenbrightwingthe3890]

@@rexerator Becasue they knew the data would be her downfall.

[@rexerator]

@@queenbrightwingthe3890 of course. That set of pics where every strand of hair matches automatically proves that they lied about not editing pictures. They said they were two different pictures at different times of day. But quite frankly that’s impossible for every single strand of hair to match like that. Its honestly kind of sad that they genuinely thought nobody would notice, like lmao. What kind of clown would submit two of the same picture into evidence like that. They literally told on themselves.

[@shanie7192]

@@rexerator because Amber mustn't have given her team the devices. Wouldn't they have had to hand over the information to JDs team in a timely manner? I know that there were a lot of requests for the data but thought that the issue was the source (Amber) not her team.

[@jeanalzaidi908]

( please take the time too read this especially if you are or were a dv victim thanks jeanie) This actually disgust me as a DV victim myself, Amber has made a mockery I feel like she's poking fun of us real survivors I couldn't look at my perpetrator or even if someone talked about this person without being terrified I would look down on the ground even when anyone else would talk to me for the longest time i was a shadow of myself, afraid of everything& everyone still to this day I have severe PTSD I have severe emotional issues and I have severe panic attacks I was not only abused by 1 person but 2& 1 was my mother from childhood till she passed i was 29 💔 so I thought it was normal because I grew up with it it's more common for us to find a significant other who was similar and that was my poor judgement I'm not saying that every DV victim is the same, But come on I'm sure there's a lot of actual victims even here watching this and they are infuriated no one should blame another person that they are actually a perpetrator when they were the victim, I know my opinion doesn't matter but she did this just to tarnish his name& ultimately too destroy his very successful career just because he wanted out of the marriage because of the abuse and to get his money just my opinion,she's not afraid in the least she's actually showing hostilityand in some cases actually comes off mad when confronted and shown to have lied, I sort of knew that Johnny was going to win the case but I am very happy that he did and it's not for any other reason but to show people that men can actually be DV victims as well and that it's definitely okay to speak out and can get Justice,its not ok no matter your gender,religion,or,race,or sexual preference .abuse is abuse ,remember whoever maybe reading this rather long post you are worth it get away don't let anyone verbally emotionally psychologically or physically harm you please get out no matter the situation, and as much as they tell you they're going to change and get better it doesn't no matter how much you tried there's something in them that's not wired correctly& there's always help out there to assist you,in leaving & getting you back on your feet,& remember you can't fix them as much as you want too,they are toxic, please get out, it doesn't matter if you feel you don't have the money or any place to go everything will work out with the right help!! too other victims which I consider my sisters or brothers it took me a long time to believe that I was strong enough and that I was worth getting my life back I'm telling you right now you are worth it you are loved and you are valued and you don't deserve any of this that's happening to you there's so many victims that are not here right now because they didn't leave and they felt they can stay and fix the person or they were just too scared we don't need another statistic,your stronger then you think your loved& your valid,i know because i was you your me & we are a family 👪 God bless us all,

[@nyxbellatrix011]

So glad you are better now! Stay strong. ❤

[@hyder509]

Stay Strong!!!

[@christopherflores6541]

I’m so sorry you had to go through all that, and it’s so fucking sad Amber has taken yours and many others struggles and made it that much harder to come foreword

[@emmyemmy8669]

this Expert is a legend! he was also the photography expert on the jodi arias case. 40yrs experience and works with DOD, DOJ, many local and federal agencies, insurance companies and other private companies. amber’s team wasted time crossing him. they know they didn’t turn in original unaltered photographs - no way around the truth in this situation.

[@saranefzaoui9046]

Wow!! I didn’t know that. Very impressive profile

[@Anaizzz]

Well Shittttttt

[@Mario-xl8zz]

Very interesting 🤔

[@armchairgeneralissimo]

Wow, really sums up what a dumb move bringing up his education was. Dude's been in the game longer than college courses for it have existed.

[@wortyle]

And then the guy had the audacity to question his credentials with “BuT yOu doN’t hAvE a DeGrEe iN CoMpUtEr SciEnCe”

[@elizabethlacky6068]

The fact that Amber's lawyers are so protective of the pictures shows they're scared to let this guy talk.

[@Zen-jg5xj]

Lol and Amber's smug reaction is hilarious, she thought she was winning 🤣🤣

[@RottenInDenmarkOrginal]

This guy is trying to get this guy to answer a question that he will NOT answer because it cannot be answered truthfully...no matter how much he badgers him! THIS IS GOLD!

[@lollylula6399]

I admire his integrity so much, that and his expertise - mega chad

[@kathybaity4587]

I thought the judge might asert herself with his badgering of this elder witness.

[@kathybaity4587]

@@lollylula6399 your right. Bless him.

[@hoolydooly5799]

I am an engineer, and classic example of non-tech, non-math people like Lawyers & humanities or Arts etc DO NOT often grasp technical 'grey areas' THIS SOLICITOR technically misrepresented the question, hence why the expert could not answer Yes or No !!

[@personafanatic4597]

i love that he's just sitting there with a little smile while they try to crossex him lmao

[@EMurph42]

42:30 FAN FOR LIFE ZACK! I’m not a gamer, I just appreciate really funny people. I’ve been watching you since 1/2 thru the Depp trial but you’ve earned my respect sir. People like you make the world a better place & I look forward to seeing you do great things in the future. The end

[@wilczur335]

Damn the way that dishonest lawyer was trying to coerce that expert into telling him the answer that he wanted to hear and not letting the expert tell the actual correct answer was quite infuriating and disgusting. Then he has the nerve to say that the expert is not answering his question. What he really meant is "he's not giving me the answer I want". I was relieved when Johnny's team let the expert have his word afterwards. What a bunch of nutjobs team shitstain is, jesus ...

[@CURRYHSG]

As upsetting as it is, That’s part of a lawyers job to do that. Although a good lawyer (Johnny’s whole team) will allow the witness to answer questions in full because they’ve asked questions so we’ll that the true answer won’t hurt their case

[@wilczur335]

@@CURRYHSG Oh I know, a lawyer's job is not to fight for the truth but to fight for their client. But yeah it's still frustrating to see it happen especially since it's so blatant and obvious and it never get's checked or even called out. And I think it's so frustrating because in normal lives we're used to seeing bullshit behaviour usually be called out on the spot - you're chatting with people, somebody start obviously lying, people around them start disagreeing because they smell sushi - but I guess that's not how courts work. On the flip side I'm sure the judge is smart enough to see the bollocks Amber's team is peddling, so maybe in the end, letting them do their thing might be better for Johnny's case.

[@hinzir82]

@@CURRYHSG I really think law must change and job description of lawyers and what must they do should change. Lawyers should not work to win for their side. Both side lawyers must work to reach the truth and find innocence and guilty thru that. And if found out that they are trying to reduce evidence and try to show real guilty people as innocence to earn money they must be hold responsible as well and get punishment by court.

[@jen7916]

That lawyer infuriated JD too. Idk what he said to that lawyer but it was something. Camille put her hand on his arm to kind of tell him nicely to shush lol

[@awkwardautistic]

The lawyer has to do his job

[@antonnym214]

I always say this, and I'll say it again: IF you falsely accuse someone of a crime, then YOU should serve the sentence for that crime, as though you had done it yourself. IF Ms. Turd has done this, then she should indeed go up the river for assault, battery, rape, and everything else she has falsely accused Johnny of doing. Why? because being entitled and (after a fashion) famous doesn't mean you're above the law.

[@M3GANdoll]

AGREED 1000%!!!

[@chris5947]

Yes!! This!! I absolutely agree with this. If you're willing to inflict damage to someone through scheming and lying, when caught, you should be punished according to the damage you intended to inflict. It's such BS that people get away with this shit.

[@cyberbird451]

💯 but the reality is that a lot of the time the rich and famous ARE above the law, for anyone else it would be a slam dunk, but for them it's never guaranteed that the 'justice' system will work or not.

[@loraedwards2435]

Facts... add on his families suffering

[@sinnerthesinful552]

Great Idea, but it woudln't work in practice

[@goldenjam_0189]

Lawyer: "asks question" Witness: *tries to answer* Same lawyer: "Objection"

[@vicky1rn52]

😂😂😂

[@normacolon9618]

Objection again from their own lawyer .hilarious. and judge let them get away with ot..judge. ask another question. Fkrs all of them

[@MagnusXAlec4ever]

Lawyer then "forgets" his own question. XD

[@tadochov]

but you know, you can object to the way a witness is answering your question. you can object to a question (as an opposing team) or you can object to an answer even to your question if the answer is wrognly phrased or just isnt answering. there is nothing wrong about that. people keep on saying how hilarious this is and how incompetent they actually are (which in some cases might be true), but this is really not it. it was kinda hilarious that they objected to an answer their own witness was trying to give, and even the judge said "it was your question", but what it actually meant was "cmon, it is your witness, you should have this prepared".

[@JunAngel]

😂😹😹😹😹

[@sharonwilson8208]

The first witness concerning the pictures has no degree because he literally wrote the book and trains the DOJ, DOD, etc. The last witness was the TSA agent from the airport that arrested AH in the airport. That's how she remembered who she was. She was held overnight in jail and Tasya refused to press charges. So, at her arraignment, the judge let her go on the condition that if she was arrested again for the same charge, that incident would be enforced. AH claimed she was homophobic, but she was head of the LGBTQ rights division in her area at that time. She used her phone to testify. I've been binge watching the trial after the Cannes film festival and Jeff Beck tribute concert. Johnny looked so healthy, better than I've seen for a long time. ❤😊