Johnny Depp's Team DESTROYS Biased Witness Dr. Dawn Hughes In Cross Examination

Johnny Depp's Team DESTROYS Biased Witness Dr. Dawn Hughes In Cross Examination
Subscribe to my second channel - / @mrhvlogsmore
become a member - / @mrhreviews
#johnnydepp #amberheard #news
teespring - teespring.com/en-GB/stores/mr...
amazon Affiliate link - amzn.to/2HlJFzh
Those wanting to become a patron - / mrhreviews
follow me on twitter to interact with me and suggest future videos - / mrhreviews
For business and general inquiries - [e-mail]

[@edwinhunnet2666]

there’s her story, his story, and the real story. This lady said she doesn’t need to talk to him to evaluate their relationship. That is the most outlandish thing I’ve ever heard from a professional.

[@emy4314]

Thats so true

[@Nikos169]

Exactly .. one of the oldest sayings in the book 'There are 2 sides to every story'..!

[@brittanymorrow2283]

She is not analyzing their relationship in any other terms than trying to determine if Amber is a victim of abuse. You do NOT need the other partner to recognize patters of abuse and to form a professional opinion about someone being a victim of abuse. When women seek legal help and shelter and services for being victims of abuse they are not denied until the man is questioned?!!!! Like imagine going to a counselor for abuse and the counselor being like "well ill have to analyze the partner too before I'll believe you". No. This witness is not here to say "I have first hand witness of actual events between amber and Johnny so i know everything about their relationship " she is a witness to testify her OPINION on whether or not she believes thay Amber has faced abuse. She is a witness for the DEFENSE. Johnny declined a mental health evaluation and his team only testified to Amber's evaluation but nobody was claiming at that time that she should have assessed both or asking why she wasn't addressing Johnny's diagnosis

[@pheonixuk20]

Is silly to come to a conclusion without considering interviewing various angles of the same situation. One of the biggest critiques of the psychological behavioural analysis of little Hans by Sigmund Freud is that he never spoke to the child directly, thus his conclusion is merely based on the knowledge he was allowed access to. Same as this woman. Also she has only ever dealt with DV where the male is only the victim if the perpetrator is also male. Not once can she recall an instance of female on male case, let alone testimony or treatment. Additional to this, her selective use of pronouns in figuritive examples of a general relationship, is her embedded perception of stereotypical dv statistics. Almost a Freudian slip of sorts, whilst making the excuse that she used specific pronouns to lead rooms perception into seeing the male as a perpetrator and female as victim. Not only is she highlighting her bias, she's creating a potential risk of causing bias herself.

[@brittanymorrow2283]

@@pheonixuk20 Her conclusion has *nothing* to do with having to consider Johnny. She explained over and over that she compared Heard to patterns of behaviors of other abuse victims and determined that it matches. Again, someone does NOT need to interview a perpetuater to form an OPINION on weather someone is a victim or not. Again this is am OPINION. She is not saying she knows for a fact that Amber is a victim, she's saying she personally and professionally believes it. She also stated she had done with numerous cases of violence against males, but they didn't go to court which is not a decision that she makes. In Little Hans, Freud was forming opinions about the father, asking leading questions about the father, etc. Which is not appropriate. The vast difference in this case, repeated numerous times, is that this witness is simply testifying her professional opinion about whether a person has experienced the trauma of intimate partner abuse. She's testifying to her opinion of what her client has been through. She's not at all focused on Johnny or anything about him

[@jukeswolfy2593]

It blows me away that even when shes talking about male victims, she still perpetuates the idea that they could only be victims of other men.

[@chimei-tekinaneko8318]

even the sleeping guy who got stabbed by his fiance 10 years ago was the abusive one for her..

[@anthonychurch1567]

That seems to be implied but do we know for a fact that any of these same gender cases weren't involving two women?

[@chimei-tekinaneko8318]

@@anthonychurch1567 she said woman on woman, man on woman and man on man violence.. she left out woman on man violence

[@ladyred8948]

She's a clown and she sat there and tried her best to pretend that she didn't understand the questions being asked. He gave a bias open and tried to make it an expert open when she never sat down and spoke with and analyzed Mr. Depp. Amber team really is trash.

[@Mr.Caligos]

@@chimei-tekinaneko8318 link?

[@Nix1280]

This woman is freaking unbelievable. The only instance she said a MAN was the victim was when ANOTHER MAN was the aggressor. The only time she said a WOMAN was the aggressor was with ANOTHER WOMAN. Is no one else seeing the exclusion here? She cannot admit the possibility that a man could be the victim of a woman! Like, tf?

[@patricksocha6930]

EXACTLY!!!

[@MikeysGirl2104]

A man getting beat on by a woman is just incomprehensible to this "professional". Absolute ridiculousness!

[@Linda-pg3so]

It was outrageous. I heard her and the hole she dug herself into.

[@thearbiter8153]

I was thinking this myself, wondering why his lawyer didn't zero in on that. "So a man can only be a victim of IPV from another man? And a woman can be a perpetrator of IPV only against another woman?"

[@DewDude19]

@@thearbiter8153 I don't think he had to.. I think with her saying mvm or fvf. that she auto assumes the male is at fault.

[@DrStfuFool]

“I’m not making a conclusion about Mr. Depp, himself.” I believe the moment you declared Ms. Heard the victim of IPV, you by default made him the perpetrator. So… you did.

[@DINKYMOOSE]

For real even if she has been abused by a partner it doesn’t mean it was Depp

[@killer13cupcake87]

I'm so glad I'm not the only one that caught that slip

[@DrStfuFool]

@@DINKYMOOSE except her determination literally states the cause of AH’s PTSD is “IPV by Johnny”, so kinda hard to imagine she’s referring to anyone else.

[@matimus100]

While thousands of Children suffer everyday we have to listen watch this garbage

[@vladtheimpala218]

Her conclusion is about all males, so JD included… stay away from women like this one.

[@CanadianBatmanNerd]

Compared to the other (good) psychologist, she seems unconfident, bitter, and biased. I hope the jury sees right through her

[@EmperessGermanicus]

you missed, snarky.... very snarky

[@miralabualjadail4206]

Not to mention unprofessional. She leaves forms completely blank ignoring standard procedure, claiming “that it was fine” cuz she wrote it on the side and in her notes and therefore does not need to fill the form properly and then on top of that, has the audacity to question the validity and professionalism of Dr. Curry’s testing! Unbelievable. She could most likely lose her job and credibility that she built up for years as a result of this. It will ruin her career.

[@MICHVEl12]

I didn’t think she was unconfident. I just don’t think she cared. She gets a lot of business from that law firm, they’ll hire her again. That law firm is getting paid a lot of money so they have to pull out all the tricks in their bag to make it look like they tried bc so far it looks like a sweep 🧹 🧹🧹

[@Bleg94]

@@miralabualjadail4206 lets hope she loses her career and everything she has done gets a review, idk if it is true but someone wrote she helped a woman get free after that woman murdered her husband during his sleep

[@Chris-qh5tz]

@@MICHVEl12 You can tell she lost some confidence when she first took the stand and when she was being cross examined. She embarrased herself on the first day and had a very snarky attitude compared to the next day.

[@MrPMAntunes]

Oh, men can be victims ofc, from other men. And women can be abusers.... of other women. This witness is a joke. Hope all jurors saw it.

[@reidun-engh8824]

I HOPE I HOPE I HOPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@MultiBigbird01]

It's obvious to any juror that this witness lacks complete credibility and is heavily biased towards Heard.

[@MrPMAntunes]

@@MultiBigbird01 What I'm hoping

[@sabin97]

feminists will never EVER accept that women do abuse men. if you bring it up they will call you a "misogynist". if the roles were reversed in this case, it would have been over in less than 2 days......

[@Danielson1818]

I love it when people say "facts" that somehow show my life didn't happen. It makes me feel like I'm a unicorn, or some random magic.

[@sharonchapman3062]

This woman’s testimony was utterly outrageous and disgusting.

[@toriless]

This lawyer is so be her psychologist tried to do the lawyers job her and read off her prepared advocacy material for Amber Heard. She was not testifying she was arguing the case because the lawyer was to bad it it. She had clear bias regarding those involved and all males in general. She was giving s speech not testimony. After she just spent 10 minute describing all victims as woman she could not even admit there are male victims without conditions. It is not her job to advocate for anyone. She may have better credentials but she is worse as doing her job in regards to the courtroom. I know this just from her testimony prior to cross. I would have been writing a LOT of notes during it. Lets's see what they do ...

[@mckaelyntennison6914]

Can she lose her license over this? She does not seem capable of doing a proper evaluation.

[@HolyDemonRune]

@@toriless She the purest example of what I called "Educated Stupid" Sure... she can recite all the vocabulary and even talk about concepts. But applying those things is very difficult for her. She's basic came to her own conclusions and then formed everything around it. Showing how unaware of herself, she is. I believe, she believes, that she is unbiased and I think it's purely because of her status (title) and unrelated aspects, such as her gender. Honestly, it's the same thing as Black People being openly racist about white people and black people and then claiming they're not being racist but 'exposing the truth'. It's just bigotry disguised as social justice practices.

[@HolyDemonRune]

@@mckaelyntennison6914 I don't think so. 'Cause, even with her horrible testimony, there's not enough to show malpractice. However, I do believe there's enough to initiate an investigation on her, criminally and via the credential giver. To us, she clearly has a bad bias, but I don't think that's necessarily proven malicious behavior or lack of knowledge, just a low EQ.

[@2Theonemmm]

No need to be so defensive she’s just a witness. I hope ppl dont use her as “expert” anymore. This is ridiculous

[@NoName-sb9tp]

Soooooo… she said she has been the “expert” for about 120 other cases. We should really put those 120 cases to scrutiny as she may have ruined many lives with her obiviously biased “expert” opinion.

[@smileymctrashbag]

Good idea. She shouldn’t be allowed to practice, having extreme, obvious biases like this.

[@stixinst5791]

@@smileymctrashbag practice ia fine, but she should be barred from this topic

[@dissect123]

The bigger problem is that "professionals" like her impose their biased views on psychologically hurt people outside of court. She causes huge damage on a daily basis.

[@RavenCorvinus]

She's worked several hundred cases according to her own statment. I'm pretty sure your own opinion on the matter is shite and she is more of an expert in the field than you are.

[@dannythomas7902]

Daily basis gold

[@thedeathofreason]

She's exactly what JDs team said she was. As opposed to an unbiased professional like Dr Curry who stated while the relationship was mutually toxic, all abuse indicators were from Amber, and she would greatly exaggerate along with BPD and HPD. Yet this quack Hughes is just a professional witness that will testify whatever the legal team that hires her tells her to say.

[@dannythomas7902]

Yup

[@EllerthePeridot]

SO GLAD they called this out. Notice also how they're letting her get an answer out (not constantly cutting her off), but nailing down her flawed testimony and bias w/o asking the same 1 question over and over. That he/she assumption of hers is despicable. She should not be treating anyone! ETA: Notice her examples of her testimonies are not of women abusing men. Just men abusing other men.

[@jordanchen23]

That's literally just a 2x2 matrix.. M-M, M-F, F-M, and F-F. Guess which one is her biggest knowledge gap.

[@lilyrose855]

I listened to her testimony and I had to turn it off because I was so frustrated with what she was saying and insinuating about physical and emotional abuse/battering as it pertains to women as the victim, no mention of men as the victim of a woman. And now she's trying to justify her bias.

[@segevstormlord3713]

@@jordanchen23 I thought it disappointing that the lawyer didn't nail that down. "Have you ever testified in an IPV case where your conclusion was that there was a female perpetrator and a male victim?"

[@jamesmaybrick2001]

@@segevstormlord3713 this is clearly only a 10 min slice, but the histrionic itile of this video is just not great. Depps people in this failed to point out the obvious issues, but in no way did they "destroy" her, if anything they failed. But one would hope that after this video ends they point out the problems.

[@ohhkennny766]

How so? You do realize most "boy scout leaders" etc are women right? It's usually women who abuse young kids usually little boys

[@TricksterRad]

"Amber Heard was a victim of IPV in this relationship." "I did not make a conclusion about Mr. Depp." Yo, what? Get your story straight lady.

[@d-pool7967]

Exactly

[@cavemanraveman1]

That is straight. She's only there to say whether or not she believes Heard's behavior matches up with that of a victim of IPV - no more. She can't make any claims as to who perpetrated it, or even that it is objectively true that she was a victim of IPV - just that, based on her experience and education, she Heard's behavior to match up to a victim's.

[@elliot__agares]

@@cavemanraveman1 the moment she states that Amber is a victim of IPV as a fact, she's already saying that Jhonny is an abuser, because amber was accusing Jhonny Also she cannot say "she IS a victim of IVP" on a trial that's partially about that, she can say "she presents behaviors of victims of IPV" or something along those lines, but you cannot look at only one side of the story when the person you're talking with has been analysed by another professional that says she "exaggerated many thing" that she doesn't have PTSD, and every time anything about trauma came up she would exaggerate on exorbitant levels so she would look like a total victim So yes in that specific case you do need both sides, and you cannot say she is a victim without saying Jhonny is an abuser Either say she's a victim and he's an abuser, or say she presents behaviors from victims of IPV She's contradicting herself

[@McBehrer]

@@elliot__agares how does no one know how to spell Johnny It's literally in the title of the video

[@neonoah3353]

@@McBehrer its because jack is more popular than johny. Lmao

[@phoenixtarot1228]

For someone who is supposedly an expert she's getting awfully defensive.

[@marycull3607]

Yes these professionals need to be neutral. She just took miss heard's evidence. Doesn't mean it was true.

[@themanidentifiedasdinosaur8138]

@@marycull3607 SHE cannot be neutral because she WAS HIRED by the LEGAL TEAM. Yeah, that makes everything she said biased.

[@StreetwizeJJ2]

@@themanidentifiedasdinosaur8138 I'm not here to defend AH, but that's terrible logic. There are much better reasons to call her out rather than simply being on the side of a party you don't like. Edit: I understand this doctor was hired multiple times prior, but I don't think it's biased in that they'll be favorable. That's just reliance on someone they trust. If it were possible to prove that there is a personal relationship, then I'd call it bias.

[@SesshouFan22]

@@StreetwizeJJ2 it’s reliance on someone they know to have shown clear bias in favor of females, and by her own admission she’s done it before and will continue to do so.

[@thegreatangel8251]

Looks like Amber Heard isn’t the only one who’s going to have trouble finding work after this trial concludes 😂 What an absolute hack.

[@louskunt9798]

AmTurd is losing this case. Her acting is so bad she can’t even convince a jury. 🤦‍♂️

[@kristinreign8026]

Lmao 💯💯

[@Tea-ou3ii]

I think she was so unprofessional that she would even make Johnny Depp look guilty. Her attitude, her framing that backfired and lack of care she showed by not filling everything out. I don't know if Amber's team, experts and witnesses look bad because they lack competence or if this is the result if you have to defend lies. The makeup thing, the voicememos and the cross of Johnny didn't help her. To win a deformation case is very unlikely but currently I see a chance. This is how bad everything is going for Amber.

[@rodi8266]

idk, Miss Turd will surely be starring in a load of Pron after this Or open an onlyfans

[@jaanisingh]

One More Win 👏

[@jordanchen23]

Dr. Curry: Evidence based decision-making. Dr. Hughes: Decision based evidence-making

[@samantha_more]

Lol 😂

[@fantodk6002]

Nailed it.

[@liquidjackson7172]

Very true and very hilarious too.

[@adilevnatimasheva4370]

IOI Well stated👍

[@dotheshingaling]

👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼

[@Veroxxx7]

Sounds to me like she’s trying to sound and act like Dr. Curry but she’s failing hard 😭 also she always mentions how one male can be an abuser to another male and how a woman can be an abuser to another woman or how a man can be an abuser to another woman but never a woman being an abuser to a male it’s obvious she is biased

[@P-C-Principle]

The fact she says shes worked on other cases like this makes me sick to think how many people she's screwed over to her own bias. Which is the one thing a good therapist shouldn't be.

[@alfredopomales7286]

Great comment! I’m with you.

[@romeocopiedme]

That's why many males don't want to go to couples therapy. Especially if the therapist is a woman, there's a high likelihood that they're just going to victimize the woman but in the rare instances they don't and listen to the man, the woman will refuse the therapist and choose a new one until somebody sides with her

[@P-C-Principle]

@@romeocopiedme sorry the late reply, but why is that so prevalent? I met a lady one time with zero to few bias and she was the greatest therapist I’ve ever had to pleasure of working with. She was an older lady who worked with the prison system and she would preach about how some therapists bring their baggage with them whether it’s a man or a woman. Because that situation plays out both ways when men bring their wives to male counselor who preaches that men are always right. Marriage counseling has always been something I’ve found to be counterproductive versus the people within the relationship rather should be working on themselves so they can be better partners for one another. What’s your theory?

[@romeocopiedme]

@@P-C-Principle people seek validation for their own ideas. They aren't actually interested in hearing what the other side has to say. Most people in the world shouldn't be in a relationship. Most people in the world shouldn't have kids. Most people in the world should not own an animal.

[@dalejumonville9147]

Same sex abuse is not relevant when we are discussing a man being abused by a woman. Obviously she has only testified in same sex situations or when a man is the abuser. That means she has zero expertise in these type of cases.

[@theflerffyburr7919]

and it doesn't matter since we're talking about 2 individuals, it doesn't fucking matter what the stats say they're irrelevant to the case at hand! Is she going to go up and say that police had the right to kill a young black boy because of how many times there's a "violent altercation between black men and police" ?

[@WackRusDud]

@@theflerffyburr7919 it matters, actually. (some differences in behavior here and there. While it is not a key thing, *ignoring it* is deffinitely not the way)

[@theflerffyburr7919]

@@WackRusDud Cases need to be handled on a case by case basis, if we go by statistics that's how we GET shit like Amber Heard abusing her husband and then walking away with 7m and ruining his career while she faces no consequences.

[@WackRusDud]

@@theflerffyburr7919 i wasn't exactly talking about statistics, but yea - It should be done that way.

[@nishantgautam7627]

These lawyers are clowns, why didn't they bring this up there and then. 🙄

[@roycole6884]

Sounds like she's panicking. I like how she claimed that she's not making any conclusions about Depp but has concluded that Heard was assaulted by Depp.

[@ProxCQ]

"I am not making any conclusions about Mr. Depp but he is the abuser and she is the victim of that I am sure and that's why I keep referring to her as the only victim in this case and him as the abuser." LOL biased much? Depp's professional was a professional, this lady is trying to become an actress or something. It baffles me that this testimony wasn't struck from the record.

[@cavemanraveman1]

This seems to be in line with what a psychologist is able to provide in regards to testimony. She can conclude that Heard exhibits signs of a person who experienced IPV based on the time she's spent talking to her - no more than that. I haven't watched all of this but I'd bet money that she's never actually testified that Depp was the perpetrator, because that's outside of what she is there to do. This is the same with Depp's expert psychologist - she testified only that Depp exhibited signs of someone who's experienced IPV but she never said Heard was the one perpetrating it.

[@elliot__agares]

@@cavemanraveman1 but she did analyse Heard to see her side of the story, which is why she was able to see that Heard greatly exaggerated when a question about trauma or abuse came up, and presents signs of two mental disorders that have sudden emotion shifts and "being uncomfortable when not the center of attention" as symptoms Yes she's testifying as if what she saw is like victims of abuse, but she's also incredibly biased, she only refer to victims of abuse with the "she/her" pronouns and is always talking about women are the one that go through it, when it's common sense that you should talk about abuse in a gendered manner, because it invalidates other victims and continues the stigma around male victims

[@justinafuchs2619]

@@cavemanraveman1 As far as I remember Dr. Curry‘s testimony, she never said anything about „Mr. Depp exhibited signs of someone who’s experienced signs of IPV“. Because she never evaluated Mr. Depp, she only evaluated Miss Heard and diagnosed her with borderline personality disorder and histrionic personality disorder (using the official tests). She explicitly said that she can’t determine if there was any abuse in their relationship and who would have been the abuser, because that’s not the job of a psychologist. Furthermore, Dr. Hughes talked in her testimony like it was a fact that Mr. Depp was the abuser („He penetrated her with a bottle“ and so on). She was absolutely biased and unprofessional, and she always used the pronoun „She“ when she talked in general about victims of DV and „He“ when she talked about the perpetrator of DV.

[@Crystan]

@@cavemanraveman1 To be fair, if Amber's terrible acting and lack of evidence was enough to convince this 'expert' that she's a victim of IPV, then she might as well bin her credentials.

[@susyward581]

I never tire of watching Wayne Denison draw out the truth, getting the so called professional witnesses to expose themselves for their biased and unfounded statements. Denison is brilliant!

[@unknown403error6]

This woman is a great example of how a human mind can be so narrowed

[@ContinuumOnPC]

This "Doctor" is a joke. "I'm not making a conclusion about Mr. Depp himself" yet only a few minutes ago she said: "My determination was, as I stated, that Ms. Heard was the victim of IPV". Sounds like you've already concluded your biased opinion to me.

[@bee1345]

She never ever met JD🤯

[@hafizi01]

yup caught that instantly. not making a conclusion my ass.

[@gNOme_5]

Boom!!! *Exactly what I said!!! You're here testifying on behalf of Ms. Heard that she was in an IPV with Mr. Depp.... so in other words- YOU HAD TO HAVE FORMED AN OPINION!?

[@NotKev2017]

How any Doctor can make a conclusion on IPV only based one side is ridiculous.

[@Pseudometrik]

Bruuh she’s a doctor? I thought doctor supposed not to be opinionated

[@stacyververis7731]

She’s not much of a professional that she didn’t do any tests but took a known liars word as gospel.unbelievable she needs to reevaluate her profession .

[@marioramirez6741]

Preach

[@leolovell6218]

She's a quack

[@whoknows8225]

she read notes... damning evidence those notes

[@luv4all]

I administer PTSD tests and people can lie so it means nothing if people lie on the tests anyway. AH would already know all the PTSD criteria so the clinical judgment of 'I think she may be exaggerating her symptoms' may be more of a realistic evaluation.

[@jamesrustle7536]

Her job is to be a womens advocate psych witness. Thats why she has so much money.

[@joe-ff1ki]

She told that "I have been hired by this legal team many times" Her face tells me who she is. You can never, in million years, prove me that this person is not corrupt. She knows who hires her and why she keeps getting hired by that legal team. And thats because she does what that legal team wants her to do, keep their side.

[@genxx2724]

She’s a hack.

[@stanleymyrick4068]

Maybe a little bit of that. Mostly though, she is just a man hater and loves that she gets paid to hate men.

[@sandracarson2509]

Agree

[@staycalmandreflect5296]

Wtf.. This woman needs to be in jail. She clearly does this for just money and AH team specially chose and paid her to say what they need to her to say. She is dangerous and needs her licence revoked ASAP.

[@chuckn4851]

Right there at the end, "it's not necessarily totally blind" YES, it absolutely is, on an ethics level for psychological counseling, it absolutely is. We're trained to *never* make an evaluation/diagnosis of someone whom we've never personally had at least one session with. Dr. Hughes has grounds right here to have her license suspended.

[@heckensteiner4713]

And saying "it's not necessarily totally blind" basically means it was blind, just not TOTALLY blind.

[@peoplez129]

Psychologists are people who need to validate their failing profession, because it's actually for the most part, a useless field that has been drummed up in its importance. What really pisses me off is they seem to have used the couples therapy sessions (that Amber forced for nefarious reasons) to abuse Johnny on behalf of Amber, by taking her side and making him out to be the problem. It seems that since Amber was paying, they were taking her side. If Johnny had took them to the side and wrote a bigger check, I bet they would have flipped the script and came at Amber instead. It feels like one of those cases of blackmail and extortion, but Depp wanted nothing to do with it, so he didn't get the hint and didn't pay them to take his side. I think she's been trying to milk the hell out of this whole situation from start to finish. She comes off as a hack who is more of a yes man for wealthy people. I'd be interested to know if there was ever even one case she took where she didn't diagnose the person how they wanted to be diagnosed. I think her main clientele are people looking for good prescription party drugs and people looking to get leverage over their partners. Judging by her looks, she's had plastic surgery just like the rest of the Hollywood crowd, and is just as plastic and fake as the rest. Barbie psychologist. She comes off as a rich mans housewife who does this job to feel like she's worth something, when she's actually as vile and worthless as the rest of the trash in Hollywood.

[@healthystyle]

Exactly 100%

[@healthystyle]

@@heckensteiner4713 100% Correct!!!

[@ABHIMANYUKUMAR-jp4jp]

@@peoplez129 failing profession? I hope you’re joking 😂. This is just a bad example of a psychologist

[@tobelee6985]

Amber: "I want Dr. Curry!" Her PR team: "Shhhh, we have Dr. Curry at home." Dr. Curry at home:

[@user_id2134]

the laugh i just let out 😂😂

[@neonoah3353]

Dr. curry is too hot and spicy for her.

[@welheminaclayton3680]

This comment had absolutely no business being that funny 😭

[@ShardosandLucy]

Underrated comment

[@JadeAislin]

Interesting how she said in many different ways that she had found the male as a victim only when the abuser was another man and the woman was the abuser only if the victim was also female. She never said that the male could be a victim of a female abuser.

[@robertingham3525]

Imagine being a psychologist and actually believing miss heard and that depp abused her. Time to retire lady.

[@ericamiller9141]

#dr.hughesisaquack

[@user-ho7mg9ol7w]

Not necessarily. The defence are doing their job to undermine her. She has fully evaluated Amber because she's had access. It doesn't make her a bad psychologist. Johnny's team are being really smart. By refusing her access to him and letting her hear what the public does, she would conclude that Amber was the alleged victim. Which means that the prosecution can't grill her on Johnny's assessment and she comes off as biased.

[@robertingham3525]

@@user-ho7mg9ol7w there is no evidence of depp abusing her yet there is a ton of evidence of heard abusing depp and others in her past.

[@annmowatt7547]

A dreadful witness who should be ashamed of calling herself a therapist.

[@doodoo871]

All her ethics were compromised/bought to give a biased evaluation in AH’s favor. Terrible and blatant abuse of her position in the medical field.

[@Griffex394]

I don't think its right to insult someone's career based on a trial, even less on a 9 min clip.

[@HelloSirHowCanIScamYouToday]

She said at the end of the clip that she didn't make any conclusion on Mr Depp yet she says that Amber is a victim here and cannot be the one to abuse. How does that make sense? This expert is running around in circles.

[@doloressanchez3891]

Also, she kept stating again and again as facts about JD’s compulsive jealousy and other compulsive behaviors 🙄.

[@cheycheyfriend247]

How much do you want to bet she’s being paid?

[@DonScorchio]

@@cheycheyfriend247 she stated in the interview 500 shbucks an hour.

[@shannonm.4087]

she also said she does not testify on behalf of anyone- then says she recently testified on the behalf of a man- the expert ain't no expert!

[@marvthedog1972]

yeah i agree... not making a conclusion yet, concludes that AH is the victim of IPV.. um.. say what?

[@nyla5065]

And this is why when you're looking for a QUALIFIED therapist that you do your research and if you don't feel comfortable, discontinue with them (possibly report them if severe enough) and locate a GOOD therapist. Look how bias this woman is. How many male clients has she treated poorly? How many of her male clients have commit suicide because she convinced them they were the problem or the wife/girlfriend had a right to assault them? She needs to be investigated.

[@missladybob4208]

Agreed

[@AB-zz3zt]

"I'm not making a conclusion about MR Depp himself" And jet not more then 3 minutes early "In this instance I used he/him because Mr depp is the offender while amber is the victim" Da fuk you on about.

[@OctoberGirl1009]

And this Dr. disregarded notes…basically picking and choosing notes that applied to “her” theory. So pathetic!!! Hopefully jury sees right through this woman. Did anyone catch her say “I know I’m right?”

[@jiml4987]

Time stamp it

[@jordanchen23]

Her voice cracked at that moment. Seems like she really needs that to be the true in order for everything in her life to work out.

[@rosecarter3133]

Another one who believes always right never wrong. Full of herself obvious!!

[@bambilackner]

No sorry, I refused to watch any of it after seeing a clip of where this doctor was going and I as a woman of domestic violence and a brother who went through the same thing with his girlfriend I find woman can be more cunning they can be the abuser and just lie about abuse with no evidence and get a man locked up and get his probation or parole violated with just one lie. They have the best of both worlds so to speak if their truly a victim their believed if their the abuser their still believed. Men have to have money and a good legal team behind them like depp to get ppl to believe them, a lot of the ppl believing him now had at one point stopped being fans and took ambers side.

[@jordanchen23]

@@bambilackner I completely understand. It's hard to stomach watching someone bend their ethics with such flagrant disregard. I myself had to take breaks every now and then cuz it's just too much sometimes. That being said, once I understood the rhythm of these proceedings I can at least watch knowing that the next shoe will eventually drop. The outrage tends to subside once you realize others watching are also reaching similar conclusions as you and it makes you feel a little less unhinged.

[@VanceHelw]

Dr Curry : I'm not here to determine who's the abuser. Dr Hughes: Yep JD is the abuser.

[@qwerty-wt5dr]

that moment when beautiful Dr Curry also does her job well... So satisfying

[@richardgray8593]

@@qwerty-wt5dr Are you saying that Dr. Hughes is not beautiful?

[@Algojo]

@@richardgray8593 she look like an old lizard.

[@songs7845]

@@richardgray8593 is she?

[@richardgray8593]

@@songs7845 She is a beast. Scary.

[@DlcEnergy]

Could you imagine a man who's recorded admitting to assaulting his wife then going to some biased male psychologist indicating him as the victim and her as the abuser. Would never happen. And unlike being biased against men as if they must be WB's just cause they're stronger, being biased against women since they know full well nobody would even care to stop her attacking him in public and people would just find it funny or think he deserves it.

[@AliChitax]

That's why you have to stop and spit on the face of every feminist

[@caprisun6910]

It shouldnt ever happen but it does because people have personal agendas that affect their work.

[@destinyhntr]

Agreed. And strength has nothing to do with this if it's one-sided. A literal giant could be a victim of a small woman if he wasn't fighting back. Anyone can get hurt from things being thrown at them or being hit.

[@miraclelment]

I've known a lady whose face and look resembled Dr. Hughes' very much. That lady I known wasn't someone who stood on the side of justice -- she supported perpetrator in the office, helped telling lies, twisting of facts. I believe that people of the same face have the same behavior.

[@nellieroxanne7122]

😂

[@genxx2724]

I know a judge who looks like her and she’s biased and mean-spirited, and so is her clerk who looks similar.

[@windego999]

So basically Dr. Hughes: -She only spoke to Amber and NOT Johnny about the abuse -Thinks reading some court proceedings let's her make assessments about Depp -She's never testified about Men v Women violence, only talked to gay men who were being abused and never testified on their behalf in court -Amber's team often works with her so they know she'll side with them -And she only got involved because it's a man vs a woman and she knows Amber's lawyers who didn't even talk to her about this -Keeps avoiding the question by just repeating non answers -Continues to avoid answering about man v woman by insisting she's assessed male victims who were either hurt by other men or raped BY men but nothing about women abusers -She says "You can't just assume the man is always the bad guy" but goes on to only referring to men being potential victims and nothing about women being bad She might as well have said "I don't care about him, she should win for being female. Period."

[@engleongkong2551]

Exactly

[@81stCommander]

I just hope the judge and jury can see what we can see, and that's that she's full of shit, and her so called "expert opinion" is full of holes, and displayed an obvious and baseless bias.

[@mobihome1599]

Exactly

[@oil588]

Summs up a 9 minute video.

[@steveozone4910]

Even when she mentions the young boy being sexually abused, it's still the Boy Scout leader who did it.

[@er8sr530]

If she is not making a conclusion, then why call amber a victim? That means you can't to a conclusion

[@jelswick2]

@Cipheiz only if someone files a complaint with the licensing board that issued her license.

[@panosthedarkwolf]

That is how you ask smart questions. Just let the person talk themselves into a trap, just like here. No interruptions, just letting them screw over themselves.

[@scarletspectre153]

''i like to let people who like to talk talk, it makes it easier to find how full of shit they are'' jackie chan, rush hour (i think).

[@s77lom49]

So it's not necessarily "totally" blind, it's just necessarily "almost completely" blind. OK, I got it. Thank you. Go home please.

[@KingOfWinter]

Omg to come out and say she knows for a fact that Johnny is the abuser and Amber is the victim when she’s clearly only heard one side of the story is disgusting. It would be different if she had sat with both of them separate and together for her assessment but this is blatant bias. I hope the jury can see through this.

[@Kblmquist]

As someone with diagnosed PTSD because of abuse, how can she make that statement. None of my doctors or therapists told me I was the victim. They guided me, tried different approaches to first help me come to that realization myself first. It took a while then I remember working on me accepting that it wasn’t my fault. So how can she say she knows Amber is the victim? I don’t understand how she can testify to that without personally seeing Johnny abuse Amber.

[@angeliccow]

It would not have mattered if she met with Johnny she would have met with him with the notion that he was the abuser and found ways to make it true. JD would have retreated and been somewhat uncooperative because he would sense her hostility and she would use that to say he’s the abuser. He is the he and that made him guilty - she didn’t need to meet him he has the penis and AH has the vagina.

[@danialyousaf6456]

@@Kblmquist money. Also cuz amber would murder her otherwise.

[@danialyousaf6456]

@@Kblmquist only reason why her lawyers her still defending her.

[@asseyez-vous6492]

Why is the judge allowing this testimony?

[@BASH_ANGEL]

IMAGINE THIS PSYCHOLOGIST WITH A DOCTORATE DEGREE AND YET SHE CANNOT CONTROL HER ANGER AND IRRITATION? THE IRONY OF SUCH PROFESSION!

[@LibertyAnne21]

Psychologists are human. Sometimes human emotions aren't always controllable .

[@PaddyFilly]

True. In fact I can see the permanent smirk on her face. She is very transparent.

[@Adriaan2005]

@@LibertyAnne21 Isnt she supposed to have quite some experience testifying in court? Isnt that part of her job? I mean, of course shes human, of course psychologists have the right to "lose control", but not in this context, not when you're pretty much doing your job, thats just unprofessionnal.

[@garykeenan9897]

@@LibertyAnne21 The psychologist Johnny's team used had no problem being calm and professional while answering stupid questions from the other side.

[@wilsonrawlin8547]

@@Adriaan2005 Excellent point. She's just as mental as Heard.

[@kuruman1]

Ugh. She manages to concede that men can be victims, but emphasizes victims of childhood sex abuse…you know…my Boy Scout leaders and coaches. In other words, other men. She is so completely biased and couldn’t care less.

[@sayantanibhattacharjee.772]

This happens when you get interviewed by a legal team vs when you are not !

[@theninjacalledbasilisk7770]

Same sex, but not when the woman was the criminal and the man is the victim??? Veeeery suspicious indeed! -.- I imagine that she testified for women who were the perpetrators.

[@angaso02]

yup, like she is doing rn lmao

[@rosecarter3133]

Never testified for male of DV!! That was very clear!!

[@JudeusSamson]

Should have asked he if she’s testified in woman on woman DV too

[@Dukep6]

It's because it's not part of her narrative that a man can ever be abused by a woman!

[@erinhammons6299]

Lol. You are so right. She was like I have testified for man in a same sex couple. To which I was wondering immediately, but how about male female where the male was the victim. She also said same sex with females another words when the female was the aggressor. Apparently, men are only victims if another man is the aggressor and women are only aggressors against other women.

[@3v3rythlngsc0nn3ct3d]

Can you lose a license because you showed bias in a case? If so, she should before she hurts more people.

[@liquidjackson7172]

If there is evidence, yes you can. She would be placed under review.

[@3v3rythlngsc0nn3ct3d]

@@liquidjackson7172 Thank you.

[@sherrybowe2340]

I hope she lose her license

[@Razielzian]

Unlikely to lose her licence to practice but her reputation and qualification as an expert witness would be toast.

[@gawarlock4148]

I honestly am hoping for this headline in a couple weeks to come... "Dr Karen has been summoned by the NY licensing group" due to her public stupidity.

[@kimchikidbear]

I love this lawyer. His mind games he plays with the ones on the stand to really upset them and make them show who they really are, he’s just so brilliant. I hope he does the cross with Amber heard. With their level of narcissism, it will be easy to fluster everyone into making everyone look bad.

[@pysvtfa4]

I’d be interested to know in how many cases has she found that a male was a victim of IPV by his female partner. I think that was the question he was trying to ask, just not very clearly.

[@shaquilleludvig7674]

He wasn’t trying to get an “object ! Leading”

[@sabi_ne]

I think she didn't ... She was only talking about males being the victim in same sex relationships. To me this shows that she ist biased... I believe she understood perfectly well what the lawyer was trying to ask. She just refused to give a straight answer

[@InfernusdomniAZ]

She has never testified for a male that has had IPV done to them by a woman because that would conflict with the world She has built for herself in being payed 6 figures to always find men guilty

[@carolchristiansen635]

This so called Dr. Should be ashamed. She didn’t take into account Amber’s prior history in domestic violence. And she is beyond Unethical in her assessment. And to me she’s biased for the person that’s playing her. Not taking into count the harm she is causing. My opinion.

[@sct3339]

She is probably very well paid by amber

[@mystsilver9331]

I looked on her website and it very clearly states that she is a guest speaker on several different media stations meaning that she is a professional Fame seeker

[@carolchristiansen635]

@@sct3339 for sure.

[@jordanchen23]

@@sct3339 Her rate for this trial is $500/hr.

[@littlebitofhope1489]

That's difficult to say. Her testimony is based on what Amber told her, and the results of the test. Is that inherently biased? Yes, which is why Depp had his own expert witness. If Amber did not tell her about previously being violent, she can't report on it. It is for Depp's attorneys to point that out.

[@sinjin8576]

This entire trial has been clowns vs lawyers and its fantastic.

[@user-dn9ke9zn8l]

Hello Sinjin, I saw your comment on a post on KZbin about bitcoin investment, please be careful because I was scammed recently.ever since I was young my dream was to make things easy for others and am Happy am accomplished that.

[@user-dm8zp9ru8h]

Dang these new type of bots are crazy. Lmfao.

[@DarkBunnyLord]

I did love how when they asked if she had ever represented a man as the victim of DV from a woman she said yes but then kept insisting it was only in same sex relationships showing she never views a woman as a perpetrator against a man.

[@adeptusfantasticus]

Lawyer never said same sex relationship but she decided that's what he meant when he said male victims of IPV cause she's a feminist idiot, who uses her position to 'advance the cause's instead of do literally any good thing

[@patricksocha6930]

I love how she never says that a male has been an IPV victim of a female. The only times she says she’s worked with men where they’re the victims is either not relating to IPV or only relate to IPV with a same sex marriage. Which indicates that she’s never found a man as a victim to IPV in an opposite sex relationship.

[@TimNewmanGaming]

Yup I caught that too. She was avoiding that answer purposely by trying to word everything a certain way.

[@marievignolo5449]

So she testified on behalf of men who were victims of childhood sexual abuse, sexual abuse while in a detention facility, and IPV at the hands of another man but never on behalf of a man who was a victim of IPV at the hand of a woman. No pun intended... but... I rest my case.

[@le-johnny9236]

Shit is ridiculous.

[@bronyatheistfedora]

Those cases are less common. So it’s unlikely to experience that side

[@gawarlock4148]

I had just come out of a job interview for a secondary job... and I was listening to this in my car.... Her qualifications had me laughing so much. I aM An ExPeRt In SaMe SeX ABUSE! ....... well, that doesn't help much here now does it!?

[@naimaleilameghoufel69]

@@bronyatheistfedora She said she worked on millions of IPV cases at the very beginning and that since i recall more than 10 years, so statistically she should have encouter at least one even if it is less common, unless she volontarily kept herself away from its.

[@GoalOrientedLifting]

@@bronyatheistfedora if you look at the recent research, where they stopped hiding number of male victims you see that the number is kinda equal, in most areas. And lesbian relationships are the ones most likely to end up with abuse

[@mystsilver9331]

I am waiting to find out how a mostly male jury took her bias because she was extremely obvious on that bias

[@sampowers9735]

As a man we've seen this woman many times. She was scorned in the beginning of dating and formed her hatred of men ever since now she sees herself in every potential female victim that's why they're never the perpetrator. Pretty obvious really.

[@mystsilver9331]

@@sampowers9735 I don't see how they would think trying this crap on a majority male jury would actually do her any good.

[@badsiony]

How do we know they're mostly male? I didn't think they were allowed to show the jury?

[@mystsilver9331]

@@badsiony before the trial started it was reported everywhere that the jury was mostly young men by Court TV and everybody else so I would have to ask were you not paying attention or are you trying to give her the benefit of the doubt when there is no more benefit of doubt?

[@kygal]

If they're mostly male, hopefully they'll see how scary this scenario would be if they were in it. This man was completely railroaded.

[@Edi_J]

"Yes, they hired me because I NEVER found a woman being guilty of a violence agaist her male partner. I always decided that obviously the woman must have been the victim, and I am now trying to cover this simple fact (which completely destroys my credibility here) by citing some homosexual relationships or child abuse examples from my practice."

[@PoppieXL]

Why did she stop herself as she was about to say, "Pastor" when she was giving examples of cases she represented a male case?

[@yugijak]

Likely to avoid dragging in a religious angle and damaging her already fragile credibility

[@pikewerfer]

I am really mindblown about this. So, as a psychiatrist evaluating a relationship, you are allowed to do that AND give testimony although you have only heard from and talked to one side of the relationship? That is INSANE! What became of "hearing the other side of the story"?

[@lequack7399]

They had Curry mop the floor with them so they found a lame version of feminist corrupted psychologist to counter, lame af.

[@biscuit4259]

She’s not a psychiatrist

[@rendomstranger8698]

@@lequack7399 This isn't a feminist. This is someone who hates men. Big difference.

[@denisevalentemcgee4802]

Oh but she read the court docs and watched the proceedings. So did we and we could evaluate the trial better than her.

[@LietSayri]

Dollar store Dr Curry. This psychologist (not psychiatrist) sounds…shady

[@amrutxa]

She’s so laughable, she couldn’t even figure out the point the attorney was trying to establish. She helped him make it clear as day that under no circumstance does she believe that women can be perpetrators in a heterosexual dynamic

[@MistaWap]

Makin his case for him lmao, only hope is that the jury can see the point he was making

[@melaniamargol9534]

EXACTLY!.. No way she has any business treating DV victims or testifying in a case as unbiased. She can not for she is very clearly biased

[@Madao-hp9ro]

so sad that in her eyes men can never be a victim of abuse from the opposite sex. Yes she may have testified for men-men domestic violence but never admits that men can suffer abuse/DV from women

[@kiecutielove2923]

Facts!

[@LT-jc4qb]

That's insane that someone of her "profession" can make determinations that potentially has the power to ruin another person's life without even speaking with the other party.

[@chiathao4029]

Hope this trial brings light to her credibility as an "expert" at anything. Should have her license re-evaluated. Most cringe testimony ever

[@narayanverma5895]

She's the kind of Psychologist who'll charge you money first, then depending on whether she can help you or not, she'd take your calls or not.

[@blackdeth818]

She's a narcissist as well. Yesterday she was waving her expertise around for extended amounts of time and now today when she's being questioned she has this smug attitude because she's being contradicted. Edit: I'm not a psychiatrist but I'm just going off from her behavior and how its similar to Amber's a bit based how they're both smug when they're being contradicted from what they've said and how they perceive themselves.

[@starpoop9708]

That’s what she is supposed to do, tell everyone her expertise since she is an expert witness. Sorry, I don’t think she is a narcissist.

[@nines042]

@@starpoop9708 ????

[@littlebitofhope1489]

TheThing931 That is not enough evidence to determine Narcissism. She appears hostile, which is why they call them hostile witnesses. Is she easily triggered? Apparently so, but that is not enough to really say anything about her personality.

[@debb6393]

She’s extremely red in the face and very very curt and irritated as if she does not like to be questioned on her statements at all. I really don’t think I’d like to see her in any capacity as she’s not at all empathic or unbiased.

[@debb6393]

She’s extremely red in the face and very very curt and irritated as if she does not like to be questioned on her statements at all. I really don’t think I’d like to see her in any capacity as she’s not at all empathic or unbiased.

[@pianoplayrpiano99]

She is waaaaaaayyy too defensive to be believable.

[@Vodkkah]

I've witnessed so many "therapist" that's just like her. It's so sad.

[@smhassassin9285]

I'm just sitting here laughing because she got the same "you know you would've been fired if you didn't support their case, right?" That Amber's team tried to pull on the other doctor, but Johnny's lawyers know how to phrase it to prevent objections.

[@bryanwoods3373]

And puts her in an even worse light. Depp's team had to interview Dr. Curry because she was an unknown. I imagine they also chose a woman to reduce factual or perceived bias that a male expert would impart towards a female subject. But the fact that this doctor didn't have to interview and was trusted demonstrates a previous mutual relationship. Masterfully putting the doubt into the jury's mind that Amber's team was trying to do to Dr. Curry.

[@invaderpopz]

why does that make you laugh? it just shows that depp's lawyers are scummy enough to stoop to using an identical strategy to the strategy they previously shot down.. you were probably on the other video cheering about how Amber's team had no right to pursue such a stupid line of questioning. Now here everyone is celebrating Depp's team for using the same exact tactic. It's gross and absurd to me. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not "team amber" or "team depp." I think they're both extremely in the wrong and this is clearly a lawsuit about money and power more than anything else, from both sides. It's so weird how the internet has become infatuated with johnny and his team when neither team is doing anything interesting or meaningful or important in the court room

[@bryanwoods3373]

@@invaderpopz It's not being scummy; it's a common court tactic. The only scummy part is in how it's done. Depp's team is using the witnesses own words to discredit them. Heard's team is twisting normal facts and trying to turn innocuous things into gotchas.

[@invaderpopz]

@@bryanwoods3373 "its not scummy, it's a common court tactic" sounds like you and i dont share the same world view, because to me those are practically synonymous. most "common court tactics" are extremely scummy. we live in a society where your "justice" is determined by how clever and witty your lawyers can be, rather than by actually analyzing facts and making good faith arguments. engaging in a bad faith argument such as "the clearly objective counsel hired by the witness is actually biased" is scummy, whether the lawyers do it well or not. Johnny seems to have better lawyers than Amber, and that alone has been enough to convince everyone that he is in the right. Are you comfortable knowing that law and justice are established this way?

[@invaderpopz]

what happens if the state, or a rich and powerful celebrity like johnny, ever try to sue you? since you will not be able to afford a wittier lawyer than them, you will probably lose. to me this is scummy

[@glennw7118]

So she has NEVER testified at a trial where a woman abused a man. That's incredible.

[@simmo5071]

@@Jase_TV Apparently you have missed the last couple of years in the political arena. A guy in power thought he won even though the popular vote had eluded him again and he created such a stir BUT left the White House as quiet as a mouse and you think a jury can determine whats right and wrong, what if one of them is “Q”?

[@Tamarahope77]

They generally don't go to court.

[@glennw7118]

@@Tamarahope77 SO SHE'S NEVER TREATED A MAN WHO ABUSED BY A WOMAN. Is that better.

[@Tamarahope77]

@@glennw7118 She has. And she testified to that.

[@katthunter6561]

This woman shouldn't be allowed to provide any treatment to anyone. She clearly doesn't think in a hetero relationship a woman can't be the abuser. How many relationships has she damaged?

[@jeta1267]

Why is she so aggressive and sound so arrogantly mad????

[@frodoteabaggings5234]

this lady called a guy being abused in prison "domestic abuse" and tries to make it seem as empathy for Johnny's case. What a potato this woman is.

[@davidwells5888]

oh dont get me started.. i got arrested for domestic violence one time for getting into a fist fight with a roommate.. who was a 260 black guy. They call any kind of violence between two people who live together domestic.

[@ML-jk3sz]

@@davidwells5888 Not sure why you had to mention color, that doesn't change the abuse factor.

[@user-qh6ii7qt6m]

"potato" as an insult is amazing and cracked me tf up

[@ShardosandLucy]

Do not insult potatoes like that

[@charlesforeman9438]

She talked to Amba for 30 hours and never ever spoke to Johnny ever, how the heck is that impartial, please someone tell me. This lady should be done by the court for contempt of being one sided

[@Cryptodegen2A]

Exactly. At least JD expert witness spoke with AH for hrs.

[@mj.arriba]

Johnny’s lawyers are like sharpshooters!!! When a target needs to be taken down…they take them down!!

[@abdulsidat]

My advice to any man in court case involved with this woman and lost, get her notes and any form not filled out properly. Get the case you were involved in and get it thrown out of court and demand costs.

[@KobashifanSam]

Several things we can be glad this trial is showing. 1. Men can be victims of domestic abuse 2. Showing how some "Doctors" need to have their degrees tossed out and fired. Especially Amber's Doctor. Total bias om her end without factual backing. Total play by ear woman

[@jusdesireable3224]

Not bias,she's a therapist for hire like a mercenary. you be surprised how common place it is.

[@Mr.Caligos]

@@jusdesireable3224 yet she speaks BS about those tests like that 'you can't take percentile' is a lie

[@alexandradane3672]

For someone claiming to hold a doctorate , I find her to be extremely incompetent, unprofessional, chaotic and inarticulate. I’m led to believe that anybody in the US can practically “buy” a doctorate over the internet . This woman does not strike me as being the product of high education from a university or institution of academic excellence .

[@fuzzybunie]

It's true. I met a biology PhD who didn't believe evolution was real.

[@RedXenos]

@@fuzzybunie 🥲 we barely get taught about that in under grad because it’s a no brainer

[@fandemanga3378]

@@fuzzybunie in all honesty, nothing is proved as a matter of fact case for evolution thing, it's *a theory* after all. It's also that it's what's taugh to people in school so many people think it's the absolue truth because of that. Édit: so yes, many people in the field doesn't really believe it, but because people react as if you're tottaly wrong for not agreeing with it not many Say it

[@bcc5701]

@@fandemanga3378 evolution is very clear and evidence exists all around us. We can literally trace back by using the markers present in dna and how we can see the beginnings of where we are now in simpler less complex older organisms. I would bet there are almost no REAL professionals in the biology field that do not agree with evolution lmao. This is total crap.

[@Arrica101]

Are you trying to say that evolution isn't real?

[@amy-sk4el]

I’m so glad for clips like these. Many of AH supporters surprisingly did not watch the trial or if they did only watched parts with heard and her crew testifying for her and questioned by her attorneys. They watch tiktok clips and read bias articles. You can show this to them and they will come up with a totally different outcome that is not even close to reality. Right now I’m researching to find clips like this and put them all in one place because sadly people are still spreading bs. I don’t understand it.

[@SN00PICUS]

She friggin called all men abusers and said it was only possible for men to be victims in same sex couples.

[@stellazonoozi2829]

When there is money involved, you can easily finde a corrupt psychologist... She is not objective. She is very aggressive and cannot be neutral at all. Hope they can see how unprofessional she is.

[@chimei-tekinaneko8318]

she isnt corrupt at all, sche is a fucking activist.. she even defended a female who stabbed her husband while he was asleep..

[@jadelee6555]

I'm currently studying forensic medicine, and it astounds me how biased and partial this so called doctor is. There is serious reason to be concerned about her lack of care when it comes to making blind assessments without actually meeting the supposed perpetrator, in addition to blatantly ignoring files provided by other doctors in their respective fields that do not fit her narrative. It horrifies me that people who have experienced actual domestic abuse turn to this woman for guidance...

[@Winterfellen]

Now imagine her and thousands like her imposing their ideology on psychology. This is what's wrong with our country. These people are insane.

[@bobbicatt]

This doctor should never be an expert. It’s very clear where her bias stands. I work in mental health and since the trial ended many more men victims have come forward seeking help all due to Johnny Depp coming forward. Dennison is the unsung hero of this trial as he destroyed every single one of their so called “ experts “ .

[@Just_Kanji]

“I’m not making a conclusion about Mr. Depp…but he’s not the victim, Amber is.”

[@marycull3607]

Heard was abused, but not by Johnny Depp. Did you listen to the audio evidence.?

[@Just_Kanji]

@@marycull3607 this entire case is about them 2. .-.

[@SIenderplier]

"I did not make a conclusion about Mr. Depp himself" This clown had stated multiple times previously in no uncertain terms that Johnny was the abuser.

[@glamdolly30]

EXACTLY RIGHT! She called him a Goddam 'rapist' on her first day in the witness box, the worst false accusation that can be levelled against a man next to paedophilia. Yet she'd never met least of all professionally assessed Depp, and can produce not one single scrap of evidence to support such a heinous accusation beyond "Amber says so and her therapist believes her, so it must be true". Pathetic! And this woman has the nerve to call herself a FORENSIC psychologist?! What a joke! Thankfully Dr Hughes was finally forced to cut the crap and admit she's a professional witness for hire to Amber Heard's lawyers (who she's worked for before), for a walloping rate of $500 an hour. She's clearly speaking to a pre-arranged, agenda-driven narrative, and that narrative is to promote Amber Heard and trash Johnny Depp. Dr Hughes can't win here. Either she genuinely doesn't believe Amber Heard's recent, professionally administered personality test results, in which case she can't read data. Or she does believe her colleague Dr Curry's findings that Heard FAKED the symptoms of PTSD and shows classic signs of personality disorders like Histrionic Personality Disorder that drive her abusive conduct and pathological lies. In other words, Dr Hughes is either incompetent, or dishonest - neither of which look good for her! 🤣🤣🤣

[@baileycrombie2267]

And in this video 😂

[@justing1474]

I’ve got to really like this lawyer, I like his voice, I like what he says and the way he says it 👏

[@SydMountaineer]

Thank You for speaking out about this horrible person.

[@forthelichkingsname]

I miss Dr. Curry

[@michaelwright8770]

This Witness: I've never met with, talked to, or evaluated Johhny Depp in person but I somehow feel qualified to discuss the nature of his relationship...???

[@reidun-engh8824]

CRAZY!!!!

[@lasskinn474]

Haha not just that but generalizing to men in general too. She just apparently works as an expert witness to say that men beat women and other men.

[@Kayrim_Borlan]

She definitely seems like a massive narcissist. Makes sense why she gets along with Amber Turd and her team

[@Dana-jl2fv]

It's not her job to determine whether or not IPV has occurred. Her job is to treat the symptoms of patients who self report IPV to her

[@carolinetuohy10]

I loved the bit where he says “so that’s the distinction”. The golden rule with cops and lawyers is ONLY answer the question asked. People do this all the time, they give so much extra information trying to show they’re right. They think they know what the lawyer is trying to get at and show and they end up testifying to things they wish they’d never said.

[@lesliesmith5797]

Amber is no victim. She is a viper🐍🐍🐍. 🦋🦋🦋

[@maez4718]

And snakes attract other snakes and this is reflected in the people supporting her, from the legal team to her witnesses.

[@radioactivepotato2068]

Her work is specific to women who kill their spouses in self defense, pro bono. Only previous cases involving abused males are in gay relationships. She's an activist.

[@billplatt]

Yep. She only takes on "woke" trials because easy $$$ and attention

[@colemcleod941]

Amber Heard could have very well killed JD, then claimed that it was in self defense, in which case she'd be a murderer, and trying to get away with it. Looks like this doctor supports women who kill men. Perfect. Wonder how many of those women are just like Amber Heard.

[@VersatyleMusicGroup]

Shes an under cover feminist. She needs to have a degree taken and license revoked

[@crickittorres8077]

You can smell the bias before she gets in the courtroom it's piled so high

[@ianbrown7235]

Wow! she thinks men can be victims of intimate partner violence, but only if the perpetrator is also a man...

[@loganepling5094]

It's hilarious how AH is tanking every single persons credibility and careers that's on her side.. If I were them, I'd run away like she was the plague.

[@manfredschmalbach9023]

Is she not ....?

[@coreyhall1150]

Birds of the feather flock together. Shitty recognizes shitty.

[@Prairiestar193]

This woman seems to have her own anger issues. Perhaps she needs assessing herself.

[@ML-jk3sz]

If I were her, I'd be REALLY angry at her plastic surgeon. Her face is so tight her right eyebrow is stuck up on her forehead and her eyes barely close.

[@thethotslayer471]

Getting them views my dude 👍 much love to you man!

[@1stfloorguy59]

How can she legally be an expert witness if only taking 1 side into account lmao

[@csmats5374]

How did this psychologist become a law enforcement investigator such that she's formally accused Depp in court as a suspect in the crime of domestic abuse? What training did she receive in law enforcement generally and in criminal investigations specifically? What are her professional credentials to be acting as a police detective in this case conducting an investigation and determining criminal act, suspect, motive, opportunity, and so on? Because none of those things are the role of a psychologist serving as an expert witness in a civil case, not a criminal case, on matters of psychology, not matters of criminal acts.

[@overnightjoe9581]

Should add a new lawsuit and sue her for defamation as well

[@raging100]

This woman is dangerous and manipulative and needs to be held accountable for her earlier ”works” aswell.

[@SottoLwrence]

She should have her license revoked. Its not even funny at all.

[@malikasampson7673]

So true. Probably caused innocent men to be put away because of her partiality.

[@SesshouFan22]

Essentially she’s admitting over and over again by refusing to answer that she believes women are never the perpetrators of violence unless it is against other women, and men are only the victims of another man is the perpetrator. She’s clearly bias and highly unprofessional and shouldn’t ever be allowed to evaluate anything. All the cases she’s ever worked on should be reevaluated by an actual competent professional and she should be charged for every person she’s found to have wrongly accused.

[@Shanashana645]

Johnny's team looks and sounds so intelligent.He's in good hands.❤