Jordan Peterson & Freedom of Speech: Cases That Should Have Gone to the Supreme Court of Canada...

[@mateandcheck]

Thank you for this video. I know who (Not) to hire... Member or not, JP is one of the best psychologists and phylosophers of today.

[@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr]

I’d suggest fixing your ableism issues with lawpro before considering yourself mental health or discrimination expertise informed.

[@LastNickNameOnEarth]

The College of psychologists of Ontario enjoys a right to endorse, denounce, or even strike off any member they choose. To suggest that there is some matter of law to settle in this case implies there is wiggle room for the free speech of groups who should be allowed to choose their own members. Jordan still enjoys his right to free speech. Even absent a membership he once had but has no “charter right” to. To put it more succinctly: Canadians do not have a charter right to being a member in good standing of the College of Psychologists of Ontario.

[@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr]

Tell that to lawpro. (Promotes ableism, erodes the illusion we are “regulated “.

[@LastNickNameOnEarth]

I am sure your issues are important to you. I’m just having trouble connecting anything you wrote to the topic of this video or my response.

[@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr]

@@LastNickNameOnEarth use an ai, brainiac….what makes you think it’s only me saying any of this…need to be pablum fed logic?

[@LastNickNameOnEarth]

Still no clue what you are babbling about. And how it even tangentially relates to the video or my response. Come back after you sleep off that weed bro.

[@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr]

@@LastNickNameOnEarth try yer assumptions thru an ai and stop wasting peoples time…it’s the future now. Despite this joke they claim is “regulation “.