Juggernaut Bolt Action Podcast - The 65th Episode - Assuming - 11/07/2024

The Alpha & Omega of competitive Bolt Action discussion!
In this episode, the lads are joined by Marcus from @warlordgames as they discuss the first rules announced for the incoming new edition of Bolt Action!
Please give us all of the feedback at the following locations:
Email: [e-mail]
Discord: / discord
Like & Comment: / juggernautwargaming
Buy us a drink!: / juggernautwargaming

[@LackofForesightGaming]

What a great show! Thank you for sharing, the hype has begun to set in and im seriously considering getting into Bolt Action again with the launch of the new edition! Il be keeping my eyes open for all your bolt action content coming up!

[@user-ng7wr3he2i]

I would like to know if there will be new weapons for the common infantry that were not in v2, like grenade rifles for example. I know they were included in the D-Day book, but to be able to do a historically accurate weapons loadout for my US Airborne would be fantastic.

[@Rossco7422]

Marcus is fantastic, what a gent, never broke under interrogation. If I had the knowledge he has I don't think I could have kept it together. 😄😄

[@redcorsair14]

So 5 Ho-Ros and as many spearmen as possible wont be as oppressive as they would be now?

[@HawkwardPause]

49:20 You're right to raise this clarification because the diagram to the right of the rule definition conflicts with the rules as-written. The diagram says 1 transport per unit, whereas the rules say 'bums on seats' as you've put it. My theory is that they intend for it to be the 'bums on seats' approach and this is just a mistake in the diagram. It does still need clarifying I think That said, great to hear from WG and good to see they're engaging directly with the feedback/response so far

[@WoodImp]

Thanks for another one Lads

[@rhaivaen]

I've already seen on the warlord website the picture'd map of Europe where the Netherlands is called Holland, which is damn wrong and I'm getting sick of this fallacy.