Julius Caesar vs King Arthur

[@thenewguy6839]

The Romans were amazing historians. What little we know of the world in the time of the empire is because they wrote it down. There was no history of Britain until Julius Cesar invaded it.

[@Hankering5656]

I mean that was all of Europe before Rome was like hey your Roman now an if they gave lip usually ended with a lost war an alot of tied people on crosses

[@Mark-fx3pp]

That’s not true. They had entire cities there. They just didn’t have the means to keep them safe, of course there wasn’t as much as the Romans had but they did have recorded documents

[@blain20_]

There was.

[@blain20_]

​@@Mark-fx3ppThere are people who mistake a hole in their knowledge for a hole in reality. It's amazing they manage to not self-delete by accident more often.

[@TK0_23_]

That doesn't mess with my perception of time. At all. Its a history thing. Not a time thing.

[@Littleman-ik1zm]

Fair enough my brain is hurting now

[@Mr.Speebus]

how often do you think about the Roman empire

[@kerrykelly9591]

daily dude come on

[@richcrazydad2535]

Thats because according to the romans King Arthur would have been a "barbarian", and as such would have not been worth keeping history of. Considaring he is mostly intertwined in Celtic mythos as well as Arthurian Mythos.

[@kerrykelly9591]

I sometime wonder if almost the entire "dark ages" were even real

[@blain20_]

Arthur is comprised of multiple people. That's why it's confusing. The truth is kept secret by many because it'll prove some scholars to be liars.

[@AbdullahToorMystic]

Because king arthur is a fantasy while Julius Ceasar was part of an empire that spanned three continents.

[@blain20_]

Not really, though. Arthur existed. The problem is he's mixed with multiple people as far as the stories of what he did and what happened to him.

[@michaeljacobs5308]

there probably was written facts about author but if the Romans wanted the world to think you never lived they knew how to make that happen

[@ShloppyShmeat]

That makes no sense. King Arthur's supposed existence was hundreds of years after Rome. Did you even listen to the audio?

[@drewwhitman4020]

bc they wrote shit down

[@m.michaels]

Romans were peak evolution of man. And England, France, Germany were all just trying to copy it.... Where do you think the word kaiser comes from? Come on now...

[@Oshawatt]

Romans be writing

[@MistiMoan]

Same can be said for Jesus and the Buddha (500bc) vs 0 ad

[@JacobSky-n1f]

Not the same but we applaud your effort