Just how good is China's new J-35 stealth fighter?

[@SandboxxApp]

Want to get your REC Watch? Direct link to the X4009 collection is here: www.recwatches.com/timepieces... Coupon code SAND is active on our website and can be used in conjunction with pre-order items!

[@tkmmkt6569]

I’m sorry, but I’m a bit confused with this watch you say they’re trying to restore the plane, but they’re taking pieces of aluminum out of it to make watches? How many watches are being made exactly? They are all coming out of a single aircraft.?

[@dejesusmouse9841]

And like always United States doesn't do anything about it that really pisses me off

[@Mishn0]

@@tkmmkt6569 Probably material that wouldn't be flight certifiable and needed to be replaced anyway. Still, they're too expensive for me, even with the discounts.

[@Mishn0]

@@dejesusmouse9841 What do you mean?

[@doczspec4502]

I found something I have barely seen coverage on. The Japanese sea plane that took the Grumman US prints, and made her three stories high. She's called the ShimMaywa-us2. You have got to see what Japan did. It's massive

[@TomSimba]

It's funny that China's navy patrolling their doorstep is provative, and America's navy, 60 kms from mainland China, 12,000 kms from continental US, is normal navigation.

[@texasranger24]

3:28 if you don't want to buy a watch and skip the advertisement

[@daaven6452]

Can’t afford one lol

[@tungzauzage977]

Really nice watch but I have a tendency of dropping tools on my watches.

[@etherealessence]

Sponsor skip is a wonderful extension

[@robertojofre15]

thanks g

[@Thee_Sinner]

Thanks, homie

[@Brett-fn6ks]

Fun Fact: The "Afterburner" on any turbofan engine is called an Augmenter. Afterburner is the name used for turbojets.

[@Wonderwhoopin]

😂yes but trivia night is on Tuesday night and this is Friday

[@jamesjacola351]

I always thought that "Augmenter" was a British term and "Afterburner" is an American term.

[@jacobbaumgardner3406]

@@jamesjacola351it is, but the Brit’s call it reheat nowadays.

[@jamesjacola351]

@@jacobbaumgardner3406 Very true and thank you.

[@Triple_J.1]

*Blower Is the proper term. An Augmenter simply introduces air mass into a high velocity stream to improve low-speed thrust. The drag becomes excessive at high speed. This works for Rockets that need maximum thrust while heavy, and have no drag at high speed above 99% of the atmosphere. See "Augmented Rocket" and "Pulse-Jet Exhaust Augmenter" for technical details. "Reheat" is the brit term. But, there is hot cooling air introduced into the jet exhaust that adds oxygen, and this is combined with additional fuel to burn for excess thrust. This is more than "reheating" the jet exhaust. "Afterburner" makes the most sense. Because it is literally "burning" additional fuel and oxygen "after" the jet engine. Fighter pilots call it the "blower" so that is the only proper term for non-engineering enthusiasts.

[@zaharijaafar8311]

I think it is capable and good enough for their air defence doctrine that covers their regional defence needs. They are not focusing on power projection on global dominance but more on regional defence.

[@muhammadazeem1346]

Just so people understand... China's GDP was about 170B in 1980s.. and now its only 2nd to the US. For me the more impressive thing is them growing in such a short ammount of time and their jets being compared to the US now.

[@Subhumanoid_]

Something must have happened in the 80's. It's almost like someone came in and literally lifted their economy to current level. I dunno who or what that might have been.

[@drebei901]

@@Subhumanoid_ deng xiaoping was the impetus

[@accountantthe3394]

@@Subhumanoid_ Yeah it's funny right? They even had a wad of cash to bail US out by a trillion during GFC...strange times

[@Subhumanoid_]

@@accountantthe3394 Amazing! Must be such good people!

[@bondobilly9369]

​@Subhumanoid_ Nixon allowed then to join the wto. In hindsight, horrible decision

[@jonathanm5661]

It’s the sensors, electronics, and stealth coating that make the f-35 not the design. Won’t know how capable their sensors and electronics are till things get hot.

[@pucmahone3893]

Exactly! I can give you all the ingredients to make a F-35. But it’s the process that makes it AWESOME. One little mistake along the way, and you have only a showpiece.

[@voidtempering8700]

@@pucmahone3893 I mean, can you tell me any similarities it has with the F-35? Based purely on shape, they are very different airframes.

[@YongLi-np3wg]

Does the US have better sensors than what's on the DJI drones?

[@voidtempering8700]

@@YongLi-np3wg There civilian drones, every modern military has better sensors.

[@l0lzor123]

good thing snowden leak said sensors and radar was one of the things stolen lol.

[@CompleteAnimation]

Sandboxx videos are often slower to upload when big news stories hit the world of military aviation. But they often are more thorough, and have better insight and commentary.

[@Triple_J.1]

They are reading the material out there to understand it and convey it. Everyone else is just regurgitating snippets that taken separately are simply nonsense.

[@joelau2383]

@@Triple_J.1 They clearly didn't check the date of materials. This looks exactly like video about J-20 10 years ago. The problem is when they doubt this new J-35 components like radar, electronic and coating, J-20 stealth fighter has already been in service for more than 10 years.

[@CipherAjibola-ws2tp]

Insights more like propaganda

[@shmeckle666]

Chinas been fuckin cooking at Zuhai 2034

[@JAnx01]

Only, if you're comparing Sandboxx to robot voice KZbin shorts. The real in-depth aviation gold mine is *Millennium 7.*

[@i-love-space390]

People don't give the F-35's P&W engine the props it deserves. It is a beast and the F-35 has a pretty low incident % compared to other "great planes" of the old days.

[@accountantthe3394]

It's just a medium bypass engine

[@naga2015kk]

Widow Maker is the pride of the Air Force. Watch this space for the cancellation announcement. Just like the Osprey. All the hype and now its cancelled. Needless death...what a shame.

[@blondegirlsezthis8798]

Yeah but if it got a prop it wouldn't be a jet engine bro

[@2goober4u]

​@@accountantthe3394 "just a medium bypass engine"? Tell me you don't know anything about aviation without telling me...

[@accountantthe3394]

@@2goober4u Go on then, prove me wrong, make my day lil bro 😂

[@LordReginaldMeowmont]

I was waiting for Sandboxx to give me the real story.

[@gutstompenrocker]

They were designed to operate off a carrier that uses an ELS system to launch its aircraft, while not being nuclear powered, leaving it underpowered electrically before it even left the dock. You have to love Russian and Chinese engineers.

[@voidtempering8700]

​@@gutstompenrockerUm, you realize EMALS don't use much power, right? You either produce enough power to use them or don't. I would recommend not spreading misinformation.

[@APDM_Analysis]

@@gutstompenrocker You are confused. The operation of EMALS has nothing to do with the source of power. a nuclear power planet does not make your capacitor charge up faster, because the nuclear reactor is ultimately driving a steam turbine, which in turn charge up the batteries. To power the catapult, there's no difference between nuclear reactor and gas turbines as long as you have enough housepower. You are completely imagining something you are not familiar with. And stop grouping Russia and Chinese together, just like Alex said in the video, Russia might be building vaporware, but the Chinese has so much capacity in so many sectors, the threat cannot be dismissed.

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

This is the real story. The best stealth plane on this planet

[@youarebeingtrolled6954]

@@gutstompenrockertype 004 and 005 are under construction as we speak 😂🫵

[@evereachyu]

Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups.

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

You are son of a milkman 😂😂😂

[@itinnyi]

That would make Americans the sons of fuck ups.

[@zekeaffy9647]

​​@@GamerShowdown-h8jyoure the son of the yappertonman

[@muhammadhaque3448]

@@zekeaffy9647he’s the son of an Indian that’s bad enough bro 😂

[@Spectre4913]

Did you see a body?

[@mattmcc7930]

"I'm Alex Hollings..." (comercial) Me: No! god! no, no, no! Skip comercial: "and this, is airpower!"

[@normanwalterflaten6086]

😂😂😂

[@KamBar2020]

Hold Ya FARD 🤯

[@xerochill7667]

Glad I'm not the only victim 😂

[@arrjay2410]

The U.S. needs the competition in order to ensure that they keep innovating. Good job China.

[@ssrae-2229]

😂 Like 5G . Bullet train . Boeing . Homeless . Mass-shooting 😂🎉 US needs no innovation its decaying and collapsing infras -- look how down-trodden your "cities" "towns" are.. Lol

[@seanou2837]

china is ahead baby.

[@allenli5524]

The US just needs to ban everything from China instead of fair competition. thats what they are doing now.

[@MiG-31893]

@@seanou2837Only in movies

[@seanou2837]

@@MiG-31893 nah, for real.

[@Zulu4impi]

Excellent as always Alex Keep up the great work Thank You

[@billwill7383]

Can't really knock them for looking similar to us stealth aircraft. everybody else's aircraft look like F-22s also. apparently it's just the best design for a stealth fighter.

[@tungzauzage977]

The SR-72 might just take stealth out of the picture.

[@NinjaRunningWild]

Well, they literally stole gigs of data on the F-35’s design from Lockheed-Martin.

[@烧炕战情妇]

​@@NinjaRunningWild嗨，伙计，你知道风洞实验室是做什么的吗？世界上最先进的风洞实验室在中国。

[@la-Kiii]

@@烧炕战情妇 没必要想这些，多看油管以后就会意识到，不如乐见其成的观赏他们的自我欺骗，等技术性碾压的那一天他们才会想起反思，比如电动汽车，我觉得这很有意思，而且对我们很有利hhh

[@la-Kiii]

@@烧炕战情妇 当敌人战略误判的低估你时，高筑墙，广积粮，缓称王，简直太对了

[@Angl0sax0nknight]

Isn’t the F35 speed limit because of the RAM coating not the engines?

[@randallraszick6001]

Yes, ceramics are fiddly. The F35 engine thrust can easily take the 35 past Mach 2. Paint melts.

[@markgilrosales6366]

@@randallraszick6001 so f35 is just ceramic stuffed with titanium?

[@tbe0116]

It’s only limited in peace time flights to extend the lifespan of the material. Restrictions would be off in a real fight.

[@tungzauzage977]

@@tbe0116 Good point!!, the gloves come off and the military industrial complex goes into overdrive.

[@thudthud5423]

@@randallraszick6001 Could this be the reason we've been seeing these American "chrome" stealth aircraft? In other words, they're experimenting/developing something much more advanced?

[@esotericist]

I sold $1,000,000 worth of computational fluid dynamics to the AVIC aviation conglomerate R&D department that was used in the development of China's latest fighters. Firstly presented in Chengdu, then in Xian. After my sales presentation in Xian to a room full of PhD's, which they video'd, I remarked to the lady that it must be unusual for there to be any non-Chinese in this place. Oh, no, she said, in the next conference room a Russian AirForce general was presenting.... (I was initially refused entry, at the front gate, into the Chengdu R&D centre, due to not being ethnic Chinese - having flown halfway round the world, via a stopover in Beijing!).

[@issadraco532]

wait.. video? 😮 hehe.. you weren't supposed to notice that 😳 time to spill the beans. that lady was just a secretary that works in our department and that we have found to be a pretty good actor when it comes time to bamboozle russian generals and folks like you. there was no conferences or conglomerates or confederations or congregations or anything of that sort. i was one of the people that was pretending to take notes. the room was actually filled with our brave hard-working colleagues from the beijing secret reverse engineering agency of the motherland liberation army of the democratic people's republic of china. 😅 that check is never going to clear and our world renowned wish engineers have finished analyzing that footage and have already replicated your million dollar top secret super duper game-changing avionic blinker fluid, and it will now become available for purchase from alibaba express for just 2 dollaroos and 19 pennies per 55 gallon drum starting as early as next week. 🤓 mighty dragon numba won in da word and crush fatty americanski bad eagle! 🤪

[@Kriegsmarine1939]

you worked for Dassault?

[@esotericist]

@@Kriegsmarine1939 I worked for the original company that wrote the code, that was bought by Mentor which was itself bought by Siemens.

[@TukaihaHithlec]

It’s neat to look at, but the fact that it is so similar makes it very easy to compare to an F-35, in which it loses out in almost every way. Not to be disregarded or underestimated, but it’s not the accomplishment some think it is.

[@Foquro]

How is it comparable? I'd say the aerodynamics are very similar and the F-35 has a better engine, but you know nothing about the sensor suite and radar

[@TheStickinator]

I'm feeling unburdened by what has been. And the significance of time is significantly make it better too.

[@EsotericResearcher777]

I'm feeling unburdened as well, friend ;)

[@rd1084]

I saw what you did there! Nice!

[@PatrickGreen-o4c]

Great video Alex, keep em coming

[@AZ-hj8ym]

You said J20 is a copy of F35 which means you can't tell the different structure layout between them

[@DavidCooper-bn6te]

Maybe you can't, but radar can. What fairyworld do you live in?

[@chabgcaiGUO]

@@DavidCooper-bn6te You should ask Mr. Trump to consider how he can buy the radar material gallium because China has export controls on gallium but the United States doesn't seem to have the capacity to refine rare earths.

[@jmjones7897]

Absolute nonsense. ​@@chabgcaiGUO

[@SgtStarSlayer]

@@DavidCooper-bn6tethe same reality where all the turbines blades and shafts for the F-35 are Made in China.

[@M16_Akula-III]

@@DavidCooper-bn6te Me when I don't know what I'm talking about:

[@KlausVillaca]

Power plants is the hardest for the Chinese copy. But I am almost sure the avionics, should be very close from the one on the F35. Not mention that they are ahead on AI, what can compensate and even surpass what America has today, they also have numbers of workers on their side.

[@rhughes3674]

Ahead on AI? No. AI requires a mindset of fast-moving creativity and ingenuity that China can't match. Ones who steal ideas are doomed to always be behind.

[@ThmsDouglas]

Funny how you people just know these things you guys are so amazing!

[@jamesjacola351]

Hey, a twin engined F-35!

[@ARGONUAT]

You are an outstanding storyteller Alex chocked full of oodles of substance!!!

[@kinwaisiu9414]

J35: Maximum thrust: 11(some say 12) Maximum take-off weight: 35tons Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 1.26 Maximum speed: Mach 2.2 Combat radius: 1350km Radar cross section: 0.01m2 Radar: Gallium nitride Bomb load: 8 tons Weapon Bay:PL-15 with 400km target range. F35: Maximum thrust: 9 Maximum take-off weight: 32tons Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 0.87 Maximum speed: Mach 1.6 Combat radius: 1160km Radar cross section: 0.5m2 Radar: AESA Bomb load: 7 tons Weapon Bay:AIM120D with 160km target range.

[@LITTLEgiiant]

Why did you give the F35 a higher RCS?

[@血槽要去哪]

苏57的RCS才0.48，F35会是0.5?

[@VL-inquisitor]

Chinese invented gunpowder and compass, so are u saying everyone else is coping modern military weapons using explosives and navigating technology from China. Using the same line of thought, one would argue that China has copied and perfected all supersonic missile technology that the US first envisaged but never put into practice!

[@teddeebayre3433]

Gunpowder and a compass ? Don't you think by now we would have figured out these rudimentary items even if we never had any contact with China? If not, maybe we would have F22s with slingshots and VFR navigation.

[@EwenorKvM]

@@VL-inquisitor Now it’s becoming interesting 😂 Which part of global history of the past 3000 years (compass: basics by the ancient greeks) do you want to discuss in a simple evaluation of some airplanes of the past 30 years?

[@accountantthe3394]

​@@EwenorKvMWhy selectively shift the goalpost to the last 30yrs? 😂

[@lipincheng]

@@teddeebayre3433 Took hundreds of thousands of years to figure out Bronze.

[@mst7806]

What the hell are you talking about?

[@jasonvick55]

Seems like both China and the U.S. are preparing specifically for a conflict in the South China Sea, prioritizing Naval variants of fighter aircraft over Air Force variants. The U.S. even halted the Air Force NGAD to prioritize the F/A-XX Naval variant of the NGAD systems, so we have the range necessary to keep our carriers out of the range of the DF-ZF, and other anti-ship missiles on Chinas coastline; leaving the land based systems required in a European conflict to the F-22, F-35A, F-15EX, etc. Currently - as far as the public knows - we don’t have a Naval fighter with the range to make the flight from a carrier to the Chinese mainland, without refueling. Although it’s possible the new “stealth fuel pods” could assist with that problem.

[@gregizzo8349]

With the US recommissioning and reversing retired and demolished air bases in the pacific, certainly elude to a potential future conflict in the pacific. Facts are facts..

[@wakwong1723]

😂 You are wrong, China is preparing for a conflict on the west coast of North America.

[@jasonvick55]

@@wakwong1723 good luck with that lol!

[@wakwong1723]

@@jasonvick55 good luck with that lol...😂

[@powertrip6426]

America has military bases encircling China, has massive warships near and sometimes in their waters, exercises war games right on their border. But somehow western media says China is the aggressor lol. Could you imagine it reversed? Chinese war ships in the Gulf Coast with military bases in Mexico, doing war game exercises on the Canadian border? China has NO intention whatsoever to attack America and has never even gestured at anything close to that, yet people in the comments are talking about China invading the west coast? The projection never ceases to amaze me. Just cuz America only knows invasion, sanctions, embargoes, wars, coups, etc doesn't mean the rest of the world thinks in this way. The age of America playing "international police" while never adhering to international themselves is over.

[@ThomasBestonso-zr4ko]

Did they figure out how to launch a aircraft without a ramp ? its a " y'all hold my Beer and watch this moment " how about that... 😂😅😂

[@xqliu-l3e]

The Fujian aircraft carrier has electromagnetic catapults

[@christineyoung8345]

Sorry to disappoint you. They have catapults.

[@ThomasBestonso-zr4ko]

@christineyoung8345 Until they're hit with EMP, but yes they have a, temporary catapult !

[@ThomasBestonso-zr4ko]

@christineyoung8345 so sorry to disappoint as well...

[@jameshatton4211]

Well done Alex, this channel is ooozing with passion. This video was a high quality production. Thanks for sharing

[@marknovak6498]

In building the aircraft, the key is integrating the design. On top of that, the planning puts it all together.

[@chabgcaiGUO]

The full supply chain is the key, but U.S. arms dealers like to inflate prices several times to get Congress to pay😄

[@FloridaManMatty]

One interesting detail I see a lot of people overlooking - The J-35 and other similar would-be F-35 competitors all use two engines. How come? Because no one building any of them is capable of producing anything even remotely in the same league as the P&W F-135. Just because these things look similar on the outside doesn’t mean they share the same capabilities. If these nations COULD produce similar power plants to Pratt and Whitney or GE or Rolls Royce, they damn sure would.

[@brianye964]

In fact F-35 is still having a lot of problems

[@forzaelite1248]

Agreed; engine power and efficiency scale well with diameter relative to weight. The J-35's large wings and twin engines imply a different, higher altitude A-A focus though and the twin engines are a bit more appropriate there, albeit more expensive to build/maintain/run in terms of fuel. I do wonder though, with the recent improvements to turbine materials and variable cycle designs propping up, the F-35 could see an "engine war" style development in its lifetime....

[@alihussein549]

Russsia is building the al f51 engine. and only one of them is going to be put on the su 75.

[@Kitt_the_Katt]

​@@alihussein549 yeah, but it's Russia so it won't do what they say it will.

[@buildmotosykletist1987]

@@brianye964 : And even though that might be true, it's now the most reliable fighter on earth.

[@quartzwolf0000]

At 22:47 when he said "But" my brain went to "But, thats just a theory" even tho this is an entirely different channel. xd

[@zwhitehead403]

0:52 is that carrier attmpting a low speed dredging maneuver?

[@Mandom007]

Tf you would need that for. Lol.

[@PatrickGreen-o4c]

No it's the cable cutting tech on display

[@davidsean290]

Your last 6 minutes analysis is Spot On

[@WakeMarine]

I got my Airplane education from a set of 1980's Britannica Encyclopedias. This channel helps!

[@horridohobbies]

You surprised me. I was expecting you to dump on the J-35, but you've provided a reasonably fair and balanced report. It's obvious that China can advance its military tech very rapidly. I am optimistic that the J-35 will be in service within the next few years...with updated engines, as well.

[@Nr15121]

Is that obvious? Cause they haven’t shown any actual capabilities, only made some cool models and cool looking stuff with some wild claims that have yet to be substantiated in practice or combat

[@RichardGeresGerbil]

To be honest, we won't know anything much until it's proven in combat. I believe speed will be the new stealth in the near future considering radars are getting much better at detecting these jets.

[@chabgcaiGUO]

This you should go to see the US forces in Japan F35 and J20 in the East China Sea after a brief friction in the East China Sea Commander in Chief of the US forces in Japan in the memory of the evaluation of the meeting😄

[@horridohobbies]

@@Nr15121 The same can be said for the F-22 and F-35. These aircraft have not been meaningfully tested in combat. When has the US military faced a true military peer in the last 75 years? Bombing the shit out of a shithole country like Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria proves nothing. None of America's adversaries have advanced fighter aircraft.

[@horridohobbies]

@@Nr15121 It's obvious to the Pentagon. They are very worried about China's growing military capability.

[@koshersalaami]

Alex brings up an important point about the F35 vs. other fighters that I've noticed a lot of people tend to forget, particularly when comparing the F35 to the SU35 or 57: An F35 can fire in any direction. Spherically. Assuming you're targeting another aircraft with a missile, this takes maneuverability comparisons largely off the table. Dogfights are all about aiming the front of your aircraft at your enemy. The F35 doesn't have to while all Chinese and Russian fighters do. Even if an F35 does get into a dogfight, which isn't likely, it still has a major advantage. Incidentally, the F22 has this advantage in part. It can fire behind and in some other directions, but I don't think it has the full spherical capabilities of the F35. I can't tell you why this advantage gets ignored so much of the time, but it does.

[@angelaferkel7922]

You are overestimating this advantage. It can be helpful in the beginning of an engagement if everything works as planned. But as we have seen in REAL life, especially new and expensive sensors can malfunction or be jammed, fighters like the Su-57 do have advanced anti IR systems to counter sidewinders like aim-9X (which is the type of missile that the F-35 can launch 360°) But there is no guarantee, recently that very most modern AIM-9X failed to hit a half century old Su-25 which simply used its flares. My point is that the hyper manuverability in the Su-57 DOES play a big role when we talk about real life combat because sensors can malfuction or be jammed, or the 4 missile capacity may also be not enough if the Felons show up with their drone wingmen, which will also help them in the BVR disadvantage that they have when going up against the F-35 Ask any fighter pilot how important the flight characteristics still are in a fighter jet

[@PhilipPrindeville]

I believe the Typhoon can do this too.

[@b6yg]

@@PhilipPrindeville The Eurofighter Typhoon is highly maneuverable and incorporates advanced sensors and weapons systems. However, it does not have the same level of spherical engagement as the F-35. It operates effectively in traditional air superiority roles but lacks stealth.

[@gelinrefira]

It is extremely unlikely that the J-20 and J-35 won't be able to do this anyway.

[@angelaferkel7922]

@ yeah and even if not, this feature only works in safe airspace over countries that have no airforce. In a war between these two superpowers, EW and other IR countermeasures would make this 360° very unreliable and mostly useless

[@johnsilver9338]

Compared to F-35, J-20 is already found to be a less stealthy aircraft according to a 3rd party CAD study done on Aircraft 101. So will J-35 be any different? More likely not but only time will tell.

[@wingowingo2928]

Computing from the geometry and dimension, the J35 is more stealthy than the F35 but there is also the coating material of the frame, so only when the US radar can shine on it, no one can really tell the exact results.

[@accountantthe3394]

From an amateur study...and without RAM coating no less?

[@accountantthe3394]

@@johnsilver9338 That's not how it works - The onus is on you to furnish a veritable source (not an amateur study) since you made the claim. J35's geometry from fuselage to its dual engines also differs greatly from F35 so guess you're clueless on that domain too

[@johnsilver9338]

@@accountantthe3394 It's certainly more accurate than the one at APA

[@accountantthe3394]

@johnsilver9338 Big if true

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

Very Briefed And Summarized Ideas: regarding the advantages of utilizing two engines over a single engine in carrier based fighter aircraft, the matter is not only related to the reliability, durability, and operational efficiency, but the concept of using two engines to enhance survivability during aerial engagements is related to operational advantages offered by employing twin engines for example: 1- the thrust2weight ratio is higher on the twin engine and has better kinematics performances, those differences can be noted in the flying characteristics and kinematics performance between the two platforms, although Iadmit that on paper the J35 with its twin engines does not offer huge differences in performance over the f35, but there are still some differences in service ceiling 1000m in favor of the Chinese platform and maximum speed at various altitudes 245km/h in high altitude and 100 km/h at sea level in favor of the J35, those small factors may enhancing the chances of the J35 over its f35 counterpart in any aerial engagement, or at least enhancing its survivability in various combat situation, even if those advantages small or minor but if both platforms possesses the same level of: 1*-stealthy signature (radar, infrared, electromagnetic)... 2*- technological advancement especially sense fusion and fast processing of information and data and interconnected with other combat and combat support assets distributed across the multi domains between the space and underwater and cyber warfare, then those small preferences will play roles in favor of the Chinese J35... 2- the probability of a losing a single engine fighter aircraft's after the engine being hit or damaged by a infrared or radar guided air2air missile is greater than the probability of losing warbirds equipped with two engines which can return limping on one engine to its aircraft carrier, the problem becomes more serious when the fighter aircraft is flying in the middle of vast oceans, perhaps hundreds of kilometers from an aircraft carrier or friendly air strips... Concerning the power produced by the f35 engine, I agree that in jet engines designing, performance and manufacturing standard what is very temporarily called the united states of america stand on much higher ground than our Chinese friends or even Russian friends... on the other hand theoretically, with this weight, the J35 may be able to fly using a single engine and electronic fuel regulator to save fuel and optimize performance and increase combat ranges, I agree they could do much better even by importing the Russian engine like AL-41 or develop new engines based on one of the commercial engines propelling jet liners, but the aircraft is essentially designed to carry out a set of tactical duties and according to the tactical needs and operational requirements to be tailored on the ground for prioritizing one mission over the others, here, it will be not very useful approach to compare the power produced by both engines, but also should consider the weight of the platforms, beside the J35 still in its first block and will evolve and expand over time, and almost in all specialized and semi-specialized platforms there is always the some capabilities must be traded off in favor of enhancing others or pros snd cons that should be addressed and refine over time... same roles apply for the radar systems and the rest of the avionics and perception and electronic warfare suits, what is very temporarily called the united states of america stand on much higher ground than its Chinese or the Russian counterparts, but again the combat effectiveness of the J35 should not be judged solely by its organic specifications but also through the level of integration between all parts and elements of our Chinese friends war machine, where those J35 could utilizing their radar systems and sense fusion elements to enhancing over the horizon detection and engagement capabilities for the surface weapon systems firing anti aircraft's and anti ships and anti surface missiles and vers versa this fighter aircrafts could launching or releasing Long range air2air missiles or air2ground ammunition while other space based and surface based combat and combat support elements help enhancing the missile engagement profile by updating the target coordinates and even re orienting the missile to engage other targets...

[@terulien]

Your foreign language to English ai translator needs to learn both spelling and punctuation, at a minimum.

[@LIONIQ-foxhound]

@terulien yes it's from google translation, most important thing is that the idea and meaning be clear... although I agree I need to improve my english language despite that the english will extinct with the extinction of its speakers...

[@rich84lef47]

You are absolutely the best at these video's. I wait for all your new video's. You make these so enjoyable to watch and you provide honest infomration and honest reporting is hard to come by these days.

[@MattyJ55046]

Even if it isn’t as good as USA fighters, it is still better than anyone else.

[@mill2712]

I'm surprised not many people are pointing this out. Especially when the Chinese are planning to put this fighter on the export market. Sure it might not be the game changer China desires against the US, but it absolutely could be for a Chinese aligned/friendly country that has purchased this and plans to flex its muscle against its own rivals. Especially if that unlucky country is relatively insignificant or itself is unfriendly to US/Western geopolitics.

[@4literv6]

Well said!

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

It's the best plane on this planet

[@johnsilver9338]

Except anyone else that are allied with the US will get F-35 like Japan and South Korea. J-35 would only work against countries without stealth like India and smaller ASEAN countries.

[@kolviczd6885]

Who said it isn’t as good as USA fighters? Assumption like this videos? lol

[@CipherAjibola-ws2tp]

16:44 those numbers are not official where did you get your misleading information

[@jjchouinard2327]

Shhhhhh... Grown-ups are talking.

[@SureshSharma-eq1vz]

Don't underestimate J35. improvements in quality and reliability made by China over the past 15 years in their Mobile phone, solar cells and Electric Vehicles can't be ignored

[@MrBen527]

The JIG is up, man! 😂

[@screennameoflate7788]

Sounds like a bad argument in the Straw man argument vein. I'd say the ultimate aim no matter how good it is would be to make nations close by forego their rights to their oceans nearby - as in as you say - don't - because all they have to do at a base level is to be 'ok' then approach threatened nations and say just give up the economic zones and resources to us or we will attack - but if you provide us some of the resources and use of the sea near you on our terms we won't attack (think much like Assyria on Phoenicia in the 8th century BC) - though to be sure the entire policy of the chinese government is a series of stop gap and non-complete measures, much like Assyria struggled to maintain a presence near Lebanon back in their day they did cast a bit of semi-strong influence over the area in that they would turn up and lay down the law then disappear thus needed city states to act as supplicants/outposts in those regions to access resources those same city-states gathered like a tithe each year, for example iron. Sound familiar? (Assyria literally blew up within 100 or so years of those times for different reasons) At least thats the plan, then the US turned up. Now its some failed strategy and moving on Africa seems the next best thing. It won't matter how many of these there are: you could hurt china by blowing up a few of its long range power poles. China also seems intent on supplying not just J-35's but electricity if they can to other nations. Much like Australia is or Canada is looking to sell resources to such ends, or make it themselves also. US will be entirely self sufficient plus have close allies. (not the ones the new leader is after). Then because of the way energy is lo and behold China got the same memo. Copying the US/west has become so cliche, the name is such a joke. "J" give me a break. These people will never be the equal of the Anglos and their alliance and possessions. There's 40 bases around that area and all are beefing up. its not going to do sh sit on it. when its obvious they desperately need a plane to go off their carriers properly. its just that its got 2 engines and worse signature by far, worse coating, susceptible to various types of missile and infrared, avionics and radar and sensor fusion definitely not up to snuff, worse helmets and worse planar surfaces and I doubt the software is any good nor the AI and various targeting and even jamming ability's. its definitely better and more agile than their existing options; I think that is its real sauce just that its better than their existing j-20 and others. Its not going to be in the same level as an F35. The f35 program is literally gigantic - you are talking about a program made in conjunction with the Pentagon with millions of staff, iirc 2.8 million, and all those country's making f35 jointly. Now, the j-20 had a couple of glaring problems like efficiency and payload from carriers, and lo here is the J35, it looks similar but anyone can make the outline of a plane more or less. I doubt it will be underestimated though it will be studied, really its just people otherwise reacting to chinese going gah gah because they think military weapons as in the case of north korea are going to save their society at the level they are at - which they are not. They are on a path of being defeated internally and externally and priced way out of the competition. All over the west high house prices keeping money in assets, and the liquid economy becoming more expensive on purpose almost, as protectionist trade is fully back outside the core alliance. That they are investing in these things is of such dubious nature but they can't change their spots. If anything its going to pester the Philippines for a time when all those places are beefed up further. I am fairly they are relatively deadly weapons and a step up of sorts but nothing is verified almost. I did forecast a globe where the US and allies would have to go in and remove assets from other nations all over. The trouble is we won't be saving china of the nonsensical 17 trillion dollar manufacturing economy thats more akin to 8 or 9 trillion - we will be trying to push off china the failed state and military dictatorship with no future and no care from flopping down by the first island chain and may be even africa - and the allies won't care either because it entails places we don't even care about, just caring enough to push them off or destroy places at risk. There's no underestimation, most people might hope its not that good because its going to save everyone including china a lot of time with the one way game being played. Candidly the economic forums taking place in South America right now are literally going to be china's last sugar hit and vice versa. Low prices and trading with the broken and failed russian state in the main, all the other nations of brics and otherwise broke or going broke, all trading amongst themselves in-kind, while being priced out of the western resources and arms race, technology. China does not even have the AI or ability most likely to do enough AI of quality for the next gen weapons its going to need. Its called being out competed, denied markets and priced out of trade and markets as their population issues come to the fore and their economy in need of new model no one is really wishing to grant them. And the J35 will fall short, I would label it not terrible from what little I have seen of it, but a mere stop gap measure. That they wish to export it says quite a lot.

[@MrPhantomFury]

' made by china " ? U mean, copied by china ?

[@woohan6430]

That just means they’re always 15 years behind

[@amanjaya-s9v]

2 engines versus 1 engine

[@RobR4455]

Thanks!

[@ISyedZainUlAbideen]

21:10 KLJ 7 has many variants like SABR radars in f35 and f16s they are scalable...on the othe hand klj7 in j35 has side looking modules unlike f35s ATM...

[@richard5614]

He Alex, I just wanna say I absolutely love the channel and have been watching for years. Could you do a short video or even comment your opinion on games such as DCS, specifically a guy on KZbin named grim reapers who does simulations that aren't based 1 on 1 and instead using all assets like AWACS, air defenses, different weapons, etc.

[@texasranger24]

Could you do a video about the future of Shorad? Will short range air defense provided by the laser stryker? Will the Bradley replacement IFV XM30 function as an anti air cannon? Should the US look at the SkyRanger / Skynex / millenium gun system? And will there be a Stinger replacement with a better battery, targeting, and most importantly more affordable? Or is this affordable future the APKWS guidance upgrade for the cheap and plentiful Hydra 70mm rocket? Should we slap that on Avenger Hummvees? Or IRIS-T? And how are M-shorad Strykers doing? The new EAGLS?!

[@texasranger24]

The US Army just chose General Dynamics and Rheinmetall as finalists for the 4000 Bradley replacement IFVs (well, a year ago, and i will keep asking). Could you do a Firepower series video about this program, the two finalists and the other three that dropped out. Or more generally the current state of IFVs (Bradley, CV90, Puma, Lynx) and their most likely future. Maybe even including anti air IFVs like some CV90 variants and SkyRanger.

[@splineMerl]

Just follow the Russia Ukraine war. You will get the gist.

[@HollandN54]

I am quite surprised this channel hasn't been classified yet

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

KZbin knows better.

[@Triple_J.1]

None of this information is classified. It is widely available from many sources. Alex is simply distilling it down to the important talking points.

[@Justanotherconsumer]

@@Triple_J.1he strikes me as an unofficial spokesperson for the US military, independent in name only so that there’s plausible deniability. This is likely what the US military wants the public (both friendly and not) to believe about their operations.

[@sohn7767]

They do double check that he doesn’t share classified information. Like there have been incidents where he did accidentally but then that part of the audio got muted

[@pastorrich7436]

...and then we have the B-21 going into production, which will, IMHO, blur lines as never before. Air Superiority/ISR/Strike and Strategic Delivery. I wouldn't be surprised if buddy packs were made for it as an autonomous tanker augmenting the smaller MQ-25.

[@daudzaheer1770]

6:26 corrections: mig29s used RD 33 turbofan engines while JF17s used RD 93

[@opAir01]

j35 is flying demonstration in the zhuhai air show and its maneuverability is simply incredible.

[@manuelpollorena4586]

whos engines did it have the russians. thats no good. that plane is half chineese half russian i dont care if they paid for the engenes or bartered for them they didnt make them. thats funny if they cant build the whole plane then they shouldnt be playing with the big boys down the block they should stick to their own level which i think is 3rd generation fighter .ha. thats a slmslam dunk thank you very much bara bing

[@hightierplayers2454]

Been seeing nothing but propaganda about the airshow all over Russian, Chinese, Indian, etc networks, was waiting for this to drop!

[@TuanTran-h5f]

You're not going to get information here that will induce any emotions. I'm sure you felt neutral after watching this video.

[@wheneggsdrop1701]

Indian news was either calling it crap, ignoring it, or asking to push their own program.

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

You are son of a milkman

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

​@@wheneggsdrop1701India is one jealous country.

[@robertc.9503]

@@GamerShowdown-h8j They up your wages yet, or are you guy still only getting 50 cents a post?

[@obsidianstatue]

F-35's single engine requirement was a compromise to have the F-35B STOVL variant. It's NOT a primary choice. since 2 smaller engines gives the fighter lower bypass ration thus BETTER supersonic performance. F-35 engine has more thrust BUT poor supersonic performance due to it's high bypass ration (being too fat) AS for other parts of this video, it made a whole lot of claims of F-35 systems being decades more advanced without presenting any specifics as to why they are decades more advanced. All in all, as with all other Western based military fan channels, it's just a circlejerk for "America number 1".

[@ashleygoggs5679]

yeh thats not how that works mate.

[@Nr15121]

😂😂😂😂 cope harder kid they are decades more advanced cause for the us those technologies have had decades of development and operation and as he said we’re replacing them already with even better iterations. China doesn’t have anywhere near the research and development or experience or logistical capability to field anything close to what the U.S. is, they’re using shitty Russian engines from the 70’s with some minor tweaks. They are improving but they are still a long ways away from being anywhere near on par

[@funkeyfreddy]

When was the f-35 made? How close is the j-35 to being done? I think you’ll find your answer there.

[@kolviczd6885]

Hi, don't make them sad by telling the truth! They need to make comforting videos like this to sleep well at night. They haven't been sleeping well lately due to fear of China's rise. America is always winning, and way ahead of China and anybody else. Chinese weapons are all fake and Temu level quality but somehow America is having a sleepless night. lol These guys are as confusing as their own gender identity 😂😂

[@tluangasailo3663]

he doesnt need to proof coz the intended radar for J35 can detect barely 100 km for 5m2 target but F35 engine APG181 already can do 400 km for 3m2 target

[@warren6814]

Hi Alex! You often ask what you should cover next. What about BAE's Hyper Velocity Projectile (HVP) that the Navy test fired? Or the Hypersonic missiles they are putting on the Zumwalt's?

[@mainiac4pats]

Thank you for your insight Alex!

[@RavenRunFoxRoam]

Whatever the similarities to the F35, I'd bet the farm that the electronics, radar and overall refinement is not even close to US 5th gen aircraft and probably is outclassed by the F15EX as well. The situational awareness, missile kill probability and pilot training are all a fraction of US counterparts. The same can surely be said for the J20.

[@kaz9242]

You can say that for the Russians. The Chinese are not that behind in avionics/electronic warfare /radar and overall systems integration. They are struggling in engines specifically in metallurgy . They have been making AESA radar for years. Way before Russia

[@Iamabot4708]

There's absolutely nothing to support this claim

[@HairLessBush]

U bet... Is all XD Source: trust me bro

[@kentchan2607]

SB

[@Broodjemetbeleg]

looool clueless, the russians sure know how to build radar and anti air stuff. better than the americans.

[@KC_Smooth]

I like how if you check the comment sections on more Chinese military favored videos, some people swear the J35 has no western influence and it surpasses the F35 in every way. No one ever talks about the massive espionage of F-35 blueprints.

[@sparkzbarca]

I don't actually mind that much the blueprint theft. I'm an American and vet and love US so obviously don't want it to happen but everyone including us engages in espionage, if we were behind on tech I would expect the US to engage in it. We don't but because we lead the way. I expect us to protect our edge, not rely on enemies being unwilling to "cheat" off our answers.

[@MarvinChenFantasy]

So, China now has better spy too? Shame on the CIA.

[@lijackson-x6r]

The difference is that the F35 has only one engine, and if it fails, the F35 will crash. The J35 has two engines, and if one engine fails, the J 35 can land successfully. In addition, J literally means to kill in Chinese, and J35 means to kill the F35.

[@HairLessBush]

who would have thought usa intelligence could be this easy to hack. Thats another can of worms to be opened right there

[@memeityy]

​​@@sparkzbarcaI think the main issue, although not entirely China's fault, is that the United States' espionage *usually* doesn't result in IP theft. Because the American military is the clear #1 when it comes to military engineering, it's only logical to steal from them and their MIC partners like Lockheed and Boeing. From China's perspective, they are only acting in their best interest, where the United States sees it from the perspective of the victim, as the Chinese are actively stealing American blueprints.

[@AccordGTR]

China cannot match the Pratt and Whitney F135 engines that produce more thrust than the twin-engined F-4 or F-18.

[@luluapple1067]

Look up WS15

[@zeric1-d2s]

WS15 is on par with f135 and j20 gonna have 2 equipped

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

You are wrong

[@johnsilver9338]

A single WS-15 don't even have the same thrust performance of a single F135. WS-15 is more comparable to the older F119 engine on F-22 as they have similar afterburner thrust though F119 still has a higher dry thrust. Even the 2 x WS-21 upgrade for J-35 still has a lower thrust performance than a single F135 engine on F-35. Only way to match or beat a single F135 is with 2 x WS-15 but J-35 is going to get 2 x WS-21 not WS-15.

[@zeric1-d2s]

@@johnsilver9338 j35 gonna get ws19 which roughly have 100000 N each

[@jPaulSmith1994]

NEW SANDBOXX VID RAHH!!! 🦅 🇺🇸

[@Ricktheminer]

Cool vid keep on with it

[@Wuchenn18]

I am a J-35A developer from China, it is modified from 5 J-7s (5*7=35), so you don’t have to worry🤐

[@cheungchingtong]

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈！

[@berry6046]

BULLSHIT!! All your shit is stolen!!

[@jast3641]

You are an american troll

[@ytn00b3]

sure Chinis, always lies

[@mrgan7205]

哈哈 战忽局来了

[@prolfinator]

God, the back end of the j35 gives me uncanny valley vibes

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

Ok. Is it good for you??

[@ryandouglas6247]

Let's just keep it real Blackrock prolly gave it to them..

[@atomf9143]

Okay I'll bite. Why?

[@BattleBrotherCasten]

Yeah Blackrock would risk so many of their assets and the existence of society itself on WW3…laughable.

[@ryandouglas6247]

Blackrock was already caught for financially backing thier military in some venture. Should be able to find info on it.​@atomf9143

[@manuelpollorena4586]

@@atomf9143 no they didnt theres 6 differnt countries making the f35 they coulnt have gotten all the specs. why have the chineese been monkey dicking with theengines for so long if they got the specs its simple they didnt get all the plans they might have told them everything was there but they got a fast one pulledon the chineese they were so much in a hurry that they dint even look at the plans they could have handed the blank sheets of paper and they would have taken them so they got took. ha

[@montecorbit8280]

At 15:04 America's tanker fleet.... I heard a while back, and the website "Global Firepower Index" that the United States has 89.4% (606) of the tankers available in the world. Saudi Arabia has the second most with 22 tankers....

[@SteveConsGaming]

4:55 I thought Superman just passed by when I freeze it it's just a bird lol 😂😂😂

[@CarbonatedGravy]

Very intelligent move on the part of the US to develop the F-35 the way they did, make it a distributed interdisciplinary project so even if you can steal some documents (which is also more likely with more players involved) it will still be a small piece of the pie and won't hand you an actual functional competitor. That and the classic Soviet strategy, leverage your superior economy on projects that are so inherently expensive to build and maintain that any realistic attempt to keep up in an arms race will end up bankrupting the opposing nation.

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

It's a collosal failure. 6 f35 have crashed so far

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

Get lost. China is making them 5x cheaper

[@eugenenunn4900]

​@@GamerShowdown-h8j and yet the F35 has astronomically more flight hours than any stealth platform on the planet, and even more than the F16. Crashes compared to the number of aircraft and flight hours means the F35 is safer than the vast majority of aircraft today, even the f16.

[@GR8APE69]

​@GamerShowdown-h8j Israel recently used it to bomb Iran, and the jet was so effective that the Iranian military thought Israel had shot missiles at them they couldn't detect until they were hitting them. But nope, they were being bombed by F-35s that they literally could not tell were in the air overhead. The Israelis got into Iranian airspace, destroyed their targets, and were back out without ever being seen or detected.

[@imaginos377]

​@@GamerShowdown-h8jNOT !

[@28ebdh3udnav]

"Mom, I want an F 35" "We have F 35 at home" F 35 at home:

[@NuclearFalcon146]

HLC had the F-35 absolutely ROAST the J-35 verbally. It was absolutely savage and one of the best verbal beat downs I have ever heard.

[@etherealessence]

Hopefully it doesn't download yo mama jokes along side the aggression upgrade... it might become a war crime 🤣

[@Leo-Orbis]

HLC?

[@vkjaencjhewbacjenajcean]

@@Leo-Orbis habitual linecrosser - a youtuber

[@sirlance1973]

HLC is awesome!! Buff is my favorite in his videos..

[@Leo-Orbis]

@@vkjaencjhewbacjenajcean Ah! Thanks.

[@dennisclapp7527]

Thanks Alex

[@kuo-yingwang2273]

18:45 You need lots and lots of very passionate/capable/well-trained people who live/inherit in the culture of love building new things from scratch to create breakthrough tools.

[@ATLSloan]

Temu stealth fighter

[@kencoon2472]

Maybe wish

[@michaelvonfeldt9629]

Bangood Stealth

[@fookc7]

Haha wow! 🙌

[@hondaguymontes8213]

Let’s not underestimate it. Let’s overestimate so we make an even better fighter like the F 15

[@ATLSloan]

@@hondaguymontes8213 we aren’t…enter B-21, FXX, NGAD

[@durbanbudz]

I have a paper airplane that is 'low observable' as well ;)

[@YepTriedToTellYou]

The engines are jutting out half a meter. This thing is a flying thermal target 😂

[@mussunny]

lol he's very "conveniently" showing old videos when the RD-93 engine was being used

[@ekulerudamuru]

​@@mussunny the new picture aren't that different they still jute out and will be thermal targets

[@mussunny]

@@ekulerudamuru source, Trust me bro? Nope, unless you have a credible source

[@Likeaworm]

@@mussunnythe airshow this past week lmao

[@mussunny]

@@Likeaworm yup and...

[@bryonslatten3147]

We need an HLC-SandboXX collaboration.

[@Alexanderkowaliuk-s7i]

Alex kowaliuk here, in what i can see from the information provided it seems Americas stick is still bigger but china is catching up , even having an air force with similar numbers is a force to be recognized seriously.

[@ylstorage7085]

FYI: j-35 was made by the "Boeing" of China j-20 was made the by the "lockheed" of China roughly also, "Boeing" of China made lots of "F-15EX"s of China as well, aka, su-27s. But it is not doing so well right now. So the gov has to prop it up a bit.

[@voidtempering8700]

@@ylstorage7085 Um, don't spread misinformation like that. The FC-31/J-31/J-35 has been worked on for a while. It was going to be used for the PLAN, but the J-35A being used by the PLAAF was a surprise.

[@ylstorage7085]

@@voidtempering8700 exactly, a decade and more of work, NOT a single frame sold.

[@voidtempering8700]

@@ylstorage7085 It hasn't finished development yet, how would it be sold? It's like talking about why the F-35 hasn't been sold in 2010 despite it not even entering service yet.

[@brck888]

​@@ylstorage7085With a trade surplus approaching $1 trillion, China is not short of money. There is no military alliance like NATO. They are still thinking mainly about their own defense

[@Hypercube9]

I don't buy my aircraft from Temu.

[@korana6308]

Thank Alex for saying this!👍 Many people don't realize , that the F35 is NOT an air dominance craft. It's a bomber. And therefore can not be compared to the Su57 , F22 and J20 because they are of a different class/ role.

[@anigmaYT]

F35 is a multirole aircraft and it is the air superiority aircraft of many countries

[@maleprincess62]

It is an Omni/multirole fighter aircraft, not a bomber

[@korana6308]

@@maleprincess62 it is a bomber that was forced into other roles.

[@korana6308]

@@anigmaYT it's not an air superiority. It's a 5th gen bomber. With guided missiles.

[@anigmaYT]

@@korana6308 if it were a bomber why is the us no longer producing the f22 NEWSFLASH the f35 is a jack of all traits master of all

[@vitostan3134]

This is about as good of analysis as you can get without top secret access.

[@parrotbrand2782]

Down underestimate China's aircrafts. In Vietnam, the MiG 17 was a Korean war era plane. Most are not equipped with missile but just a pair of 23mm cannons, yet it managed to shoot down several F-105 Thunderchiefs and F-4 Phantoms which are one generation ahead. I am not sure if the pilots were really good or US tech is overhyped. I think the Chinese are on par or better than the Russians already.

[@nicholasespinoza9610]

the J-35 is clearly a twin engine copy of the F-35, but without hard data it is difficult to tell if it will outperform the F-35, our generals and admirals don't have the luxury to underestimate our near peer adversaries capabilities.

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

Get lost.

[@johnsilver9338]

J-20 is already proven to be less stealthy than F-35 according to a 3rd party CAD study shown on Aicraft 101. So will J-35 be any different? More likely not but only time will tell.

[@patrickweaver1105]

You know we'll buy a J-35A somehow right? If frogs had glass bottoms they would only hop once. 😉

[@tungzauzage977]

They already have one, they just gutted an F-35, sanded off all stealth coatings and filled it up with pre Vietnam F2 phantom parts.

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

Keep giving yourself fake gratification

[@Iamabot4708]

The majority of African countries will buy this plane the majority of Middle Eastern countries will buy this plane the majority of Asian countries will buy this plane

[@DieselTechDave]

"Mom, can we get an F-35?" "No, we have F-35 at home."

[@ramb1914]

Gen X approved comment 😅

[@gelinrefira]

I doubt the J-35 final engines combined thrust will be lower than the F-35 and China has already proved it can build extremely powerful medium sized engines. I also doubt the Chinese will field avionics inferior to the F-35 in the near future.

[@davidgoulding1386]

Love your work! Thank you, keep it up!

[@abrahamlincoln3181]

I'm guessing China isn't paying $90 000.00 for a few bearings,or $50 000.00 for an airplane dustbin because the airplane is no longer being manufactured,so I assume they can build more for less? How are the corruption levels in their military spending? Where is the tipping point where the number of aircraft overwhelms the advantage of better aircraft?

[@Foquro]

I feel like this comment section says a lot about Sandboxx's average viewer...

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

They are mostly 4th grader cocky arrogant Americans. They cannot tell DOBs for their immediate family members but know name of every garbage weapon of us military.

[@kaitoshinichi]

Same copy paste comment from a ccp shill

[@pezpengy9308]

i was going to skip this video because i can sum it up for you: if its chinese, its &hit. BUT... you deserve the view so ill put in on in the background while i play video games.

[@gregizzo8349]

In history, the SR-71 operated for 10 years before its information became public, and the F-117A was 8 years. The USA has ALWAYS been many years or decades in advancement of military technology than the non-western nations. I know it’s only hypothetical in saying, that the American / NATO air-dominance is far superior and without disclosure of classified hardware. I’m confident there’s other means that the USA has developed to ensure dominance that we are not aware of. 😉 Rest assured, this J-35 won’t be able to compete with what’s in the hangers and cover of night. It’s just a competitor to a 4th gen..

[@M16_Akula-III]

SR-71, while being a recon platform, isn't exactly the greatest. F-117 was by far one of the worst products I've ever seen.

[@MilushevGeorgi]

I love that you used “manifesting” twice

[@njgrplr2007]

I've already seen U.S. Navy Commanders say they aren't losing any sleep over the J-35.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

They will when there will be thousands of them.😂

[@Soundmind68]

They also claimed they have full confidence in the Korea war. I guess USA won the Korean war and now the entire Korean Penninsular is under USA democracy? You think so?

[@buildmotosykletist1987]

Making the J35 look like an F35 does not make it an F35.

[@zeric1-d2s]

But better

[@ashleygoggs5679]

@@zeric1-d2s How does it make it better exactly?

[@jade7631]

@@ashleygoggs5679Stealth, speed, armament, avionics. Practically everything. And it most likely won’t be grounded like the F-35.

[@zeric1-d2s]

@@ashleygoggs5679 low profile sleeker design, stealthier, faster, larger body means more fuel. 2 engines, more redundancy especially for naval fighter. Better latest avionics. It’s body also being 3D printed, so less cost of production in both finance and time, etc. they can mass produce this thing like it’s nothing is the biggest advantage.

[@GamerShowdown-h8j]

It's 3x better than garbage f35

[@shanerooney7288]

21:03 "the F35 currently carries the most advanced Radar" ❌️ FALSE ❌️ The AN/APG-83 is more advanced than the AN/APG-81. The 83 is installed, in large numbers, in F-16C/D Block 40/42 and Block 50/52 aircraft. I'll say that again. The F16 has a better radar than the F35. Now also consider this: when the F35 first flew, 65nm microprocessors were considered cutting edge. Meanwhile, China can build 7nm microprocessors with indigenous technologies. The F35's radar is out of date within the US air force. And might be out of date compared to the Chinese air force.

[@EwenorKvM]

Why would you use 7nm-Processors in a radar? 🤔

[@shanerooney7288]

@@EwenorKvM Okay, I see what you mean. No, the Transmitter/Reciever Moduels (T/R Modules) are not processors. However a full radar (Such as the AN/APG-83 used in the F35) includes both the T/R Moduels and the processing power to interpret what is being recieved. The "radar" includes the computer that processes the data, which _does_ use processors. And while T/R Modules aren't themselves processors, they do share a lot of benefits from the shared technologies. Such as Miniturization. You want to fit as many T/R Modules into the nose of the fighter as you can.

[@EwenorKvM]

@@shanerooney7288 I see it that way: the right tool for every job. Yes, there might be improvement in the AN/APG-83, but it wouldn’t fit the F35. The miniaturization has another background for the F16. There’s a lot more to it than lithography size (smaller is not automatically better) and a consecutive Modell number, which doesn’t say anything about performance. To me it seems to distinguish the use case.

[@ThmsDouglas]

You'll have to forgive me if I don't just believe some guy commenting on a KZbin video.

[@shanerooney7288]

@@ThmsDouglas fair enough. My information is limited to open sources, so it isn't like it is infallible

[@sammcbride2464]

In the NAVY, it is not about engine reliability. They never said that. It is about redundancy, which is very different. All the systems are redundant. The NAVY planes have to fly back to a boat in case anything happens. Most likely that might be an impact on one of the engines with flack cannons or something similar that is not a terminal event like a missile hit. The point is that the only home they have is over water on a very small island and the plane needs to get back home. The only reason they have started to entertain a single engine design is due to stealth, but..if you notice that their next plane specs still have 2 engines.

[@patton3338]

People focus way too much on which is the best etc. I think of the M4 Sherman. It wasn't the biggest or most powerful tank in WW2. It would lose head to head vs a tiger. But none of that mattered. As soon as they spotted one they would flank around, call in air support, etc. Combined arms is a hell of a thing.

[@pkpnyt4711]

China won't be selling any of these anytime soon as their reputation for recently sold armaments and equipment FAILING is at an all time high. Myanmar grounded all their Chinese bought jets due to radar and technical issue. It's been 4-5 years and the issue still persists. Nigeria had to send 7 out of their 9 Chengdu F-7 back to have it fixed due to maintenance issues. Pakistan had issues with their The F-22P frigates. It had various technical issues, including engine degradation, faulty sensors, and the missile system's inability to lock on the target. This is just 3 countries I've listed, there are many more complaints from other countries. So, their current track record doesn't give any countries confidence in their products. Their weapons exports numbers bear this with year over year decline starting in 2016.

[@luluapple1067]

@@pkpnyt4711 source “trust me bro”

[@tungzauzage977]

Agreed, and they bankrupt these countries by making them pay for the repairs.

[@Foquro]

The J-7 is a very, very old jet

[@youtubewatcher4792]

@luluapple1067 - So why is the J10 not selling on the international market? On paper the J10 should be a big seller..

[@pkpnyt4711]

@@Foquro yeah, and it shouldn't have any issues as the defects and kinks should all be sorted now. Yet the F16s and every other jet built in the 70s are flying with no issues and not being returned like the J-7. Crap, the F-5 is still being used by countries and they are easily maintained and it doesn't have the issues the J-7 has to this day.

[@almoondiq]

Copying technology is gonna backfire on them eventually.

[@eric97909]

Can’t wait to see it

[@Justanotherconsumer]

They’re making a Tu-22M? Weird but not too weird, I guess.

[@aquatictn]

Not with the number of engineers they are educating/producing. Don't forget US rockets in the 1950s were created by teams led by Germans who built v2 rockets.

[@CarbonatedGravy]

You think so? if I were them that's what I would do, they would literally be half a century behind otherwise and now they're already above Russia, they flat out don't have the capability or knowledge to design anything this advanced from scratch. It gets harder every time you get caught though

[@raihanrusli2720]

You know F-35 copied the technology from Russian Yak-141, right ?

[@nielsandersen6164]

People used to say: 'If it looks good, it will fly good'... and I must admit the J-35 is gorgeous to behold.

[@RCaIabraro]

Another excellent video