"We're just killing velocity very carefully" he said, blowing up his 200th nuclear bomb.
@ElijahWatkins-l3y Жыл бұрын
Like what
@ElijahWatkins-l3y Жыл бұрын
Oh wait the entire solar system
@SkyWKing10 жыл бұрын
When people hear of nuclear bombs, they immediately think of giant city-levelling fireballs and space-reaching mushroom clouds. That's why they fail to appreciate the beauty of this idea. The nukes used in the Orion rockets are actually of very low yield; they are in fact less powerful than suitcase nukes or nuclear artillery shells. The liquid fuel packed in N1 and Saturn V is equivalent to a tactical nuke (the N1 accident is the most powerful non-nuclear artificial explosion with a yield of nearly 7kt). An Orion uses less than that amount of energy since the fuel is much lighter, not to mention that the warheads are much more chemically stable than liquid fuel (as Scott Manley pointed out, nukes don't detonate simply from impact, random chemical explosion, or fire). Technically most of the hazard comes from the SRBs used to lift the vehicle to an altitude. I suppose with modern minituarized warheads and lightweight material a propelling pellet would only weigh half of the originally pellet proposed in 1950s, which was already very light. The only barrier to this idea is politics. It may generate too much acceleration for human, but would make nice efficient cargo delivery vehicle.
@PuzzlingGoal10 жыл бұрын
Is it even possible to create small enough warheads for that? The smallest nuke ever still was 10 tons powerful (enough to destroy a building or two), and it was pushing the limits of critical mass for practical-to-use fissionable material way too much already.
@spartanonxy10 жыл бұрын
Giannis Pantazis Practical yes that is the limit for fission the idea for the Orion's drive was a tiny atom bomb to make heat and pressure and then the rest hydrogen and helium for fusion.
@mrchangcooler10 жыл бұрын
You think the smallest nuke is that small. The smallest nuclear bombs were in the orion project. Most of the plans are still classified by the US government to prevent terrorists from getting nuclear weapons.
@spartanonxy10 жыл бұрын
Mr.chang cooler Well they were by size the smallest if you increase size you can use more advanced methods of ignition to scale the yield much better.
@TheAmericanCatholic6 жыл бұрын
SUN SU You can use uranium 233 from thorium which has less dangerous waste projects
@amperzand91629 жыл бұрын
So, everyone does realize that that last craft was not only an Orion-powered plane, but an *Orion-powered biplane*?
@squishybrick8 жыл бұрын
*drives an aircraft powered by nuclear explosions* "Fly safe~"
@incognitoburrito60207 жыл бұрын
I mean, we drive vehicles powered by carefully controlled constant explosions almost every day, so we're not really one to talk.
@scottmanley11 жыл бұрын
Actually, I explained that in the video, the amount of fissionable material needed is almost identical for a small one vs a large one. There's a certain minimum size of fission warhead that's needed to get an explosion, but once you reach that limit you can use it to initiate a fusion payload so the extra energy comes with almost no increase in fallout.
@spiderobot9 жыл бұрын
Hey Scott! Your video just got linked from Randall Munroe's XKCD "What If?".
@karanbirbains91148 жыл бұрын
+michael boullon Same here!
@jensenmiller64108 жыл бұрын
yup
@benschwartz64737 жыл бұрын
That's why im here
@kaibutsu61007 жыл бұрын
Same!
@alexandreo.30837 жыл бұрын
I got here from there
@CrazyMinecrafter995 жыл бұрын
whos here after orion drives were confirmed in the ksp 2 trailer?
@jamesiguess25475 жыл бұрын
Me
@adamkollar22074 жыл бұрын
*we*
@tortellini66074 жыл бұрын
that'd be me
@SkyTheGoogleTranslateguy3 жыл бұрын
ME
@ClarifyGS6 ай бұрын
chat i dont think there will be orion drives...
@soylentgreenb9 жыл бұрын
Scott Manley There's a "continuous" version of orion; the nuclear salt water rocket. Another interesting device of far more modest proportions was the nuclear ramjet (project pluto). Before the ICBM became a proven technology work was done on building an unshielded nuclear reactor, acting as the heat source for a ramjet. It was supposed to fly at mach 3 at low altitude, essentially without moving parts (except steering) and stay aloft for weeks. If called into action it was supposed to zig-zag across the USSR dropping bombs as it goes. They actually built and tested the nuclear ramjet portion; it was tested stationary on a rail that could be used to remotely move it into a shielded concrete building after firing (it would have been lethal to be anywhere near it when firing; it had no shielding). Coors (who are now mostly known for making beer) made the uranium-beryllium oxide fuel elements. They used miles of oil pipeline to store compressed air for the ramjet (it was a stationary test, so there was no ram-pressure to work with). It worked beautifully, but it was not followed up with a real flight test because the thought of flying the damned thing over continental US was too scary, in case it went off course and flew over a town or something.
@tankmodeler9 жыл бұрын
>>but it was not followed up with a real flight test because the thought of flying the damned thing over continental US was too scary Scary, but not just because it was a flying unshielded nuclear reactor (as if that wasn't enough). Pluto's core continuously eroded and spit out minute particles of incredibly radioactive material, essentially poisoning anything it flew over. This was the actual reason the program was cancelled. There was no way to actually test it. Once it started to fly, all you were doing was poisoning more real estate, even if you are doing it over the ocean, the radioactive dust would stay in suspension in the oceans for thousands of years. Pluto was the ultimate doomsday weapon.
@voxelsofsorrow4 жыл бұрын
It seems that Russia has announced it's building something akin to Project Pluto as a warhead delivery system, as if 2020 needed more horsemen of the apocalypse.
@littlemikey469 жыл бұрын
"Fly safe"... or as safe as you can fly while setting off thousands of nuclear explosions.
@kellywilson-lawson18578 жыл бұрын
Oh being safe isn't being fun
@VenseyNess9 жыл бұрын
This is undoubtedly the most fanboy-induced moment I have ever achieved. from my favorite spinoff of my favorite webcomic, you sent me to my favorite youtube channel. I mean... WHAT!?!?
@justmeitis11439 жыл бұрын
Randall is love, Randall is life
@nickf.82039 жыл бұрын
Vensey Ness same here!
@Apophis1229 жыл бұрын
Vensey Ness Same, though in full admission to my inner geek, I've already seen this movie.
@Blackholefourspam9 жыл бұрын
Vensey Ness It's truly a beautiful thing.
@TehFrenchy299 жыл бұрын
+Vensey Ness Following the same process, I am now sitting at my computer giggling far more than most would likely consider reasonable for a 20 - something male (though those people are wrong, because enjoyment on the scale said process has given me is never unreasonable, and knows no conceptual barriers). And quite possibly the most fun a nuclear detonation (or series of them, in this case) can possibly be--powering a (semi-) fictional device, propelling a fictional airfcraft, flown by an enthusiastic Scottsman.
@johnalogue98329 жыл бұрын
Randall Munroe tied you for most Kerbal craft ever. Submarine with a GIANT heat shield on the front dropped into Jupiter.
@SuperSMT9 жыл бұрын
*Jool Scott Manley , you must recreate Randall's Joolmarine!
@Clem2TheClemening9 жыл бұрын
SuperSMT And launch it strutted to the back of the Orion Spaceplane
@AniSky7599 жыл бұрын
These comments are pure gold. Too bad gold probably won't help you survive an atmospheric entry into Jupiter.
@helioskitty93288 жыл бұрын
+LukeDude759 It'll look really pretty if you're in a submarine falling behind it though.
@johnalogue98328 жыл бұрын
LukeDude759 Pretty sure gold is a pretty soft metal, but it would be melted butter entering Jupiter's atmosphere... Mmm...melted Jupiter gold butter....
@MoonbeamPony9 жыл бұрын
*builds an airplane powered by nuclear explosions* "I'm Scott Manley, fly safe."
@nightw4tchman10 жыл бұрын
I can't stop laughing at Scott's calm, and dare I say interesting, voice narrating over FREAKING NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS taking place every few seconds. It's just so surreal. Love the work!
@rein70469 жыл бұрын
I feel like you were a bit too cautious with that landing. I mean, if that plate is able to absorb the force from a nuclear detonation then I don't think it should have too many problems absorbing the impact from a collision with the ground.
@CrimsonGamer9910 жыл бұрын
I wonder how Danny could abuse this... ...evil grin...
@aubreys.830810 жыл бұрын
>:)
@aubreys.830810 жыл бұрын
LETS TELL HIM CrimsonGamer99 !
@CrimsonGamer999 жыл бұрын
Nelson Muller Nuclear Pulse in general!
@crabgnome53889 жыл бұрын
100 years from now people will look at this video, laugh, and get up from their quantum locked couches and tables to go grab a bag of popcorn from their pulse rocket powered microwaves. Of course people will still eat popcorn then. And watch youtube. Some things will never become obsolete.
@theaveragepro17499 жыл бұрын
Solid Banana You mean say 1 bowl of popcorn and watch as their supercooled conducter robot flies to them and gives them their 3D printed popcorn using nutrient packed organic matter covered in specifically grown bacteria to cause taste.
@TCWordz9 жыл бұрын
+Solid Banana Just imagine the comments... "Oh, 1080p, we meet again!"
@helioskitty93288 жыл бұрын
+Tommy59375 "1080p? Was this filmed on a moldy piece of bread?"
@KnowledgePerformance78 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a Colin furze universe
@spindash648 жыл бұрын
except 4k is basically over the limit of what your eyes are capable of at best. yeah. granted, GM and implants and what not, but one step at a time, mate
@CharTheDude9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for reminding me of this video, XKCD
@scottmanley11 жыл бұрын
But didn't they later show that higher yield devices produced less fallout?
@bergmanoswell8798 жыл бұрын
I've heard of disposable rocket motors, but disposable launch facilities and disposable CONTINENTS? Yup, that's the most Kerbal thing ever. Is there such a thing as a NERVA thruster in the game? Those were at the working prototype stage when the project was killed, and were cleaner in radioactivity terms than a sunny day in the tropics.
@maxhess31518 жыл бұрын
5:00 holy crap hes lighting up the dark side of kerbin like the midday sun
@VanBurenOfficial11 жыл бұрын
8:18 We need to start building that NOW
@430zack10 жыл бұрын
Yah probably will have more saftey features since when the idea was invented
@Danbearpig10 жыл бұрын
Larry Niven used this idea for a spectacular scene in his science fiction book Footfall. So cool.
@caav566 жыл бұрын
WHAM WHAM WHAM quiet
@orbemsolis7 жыл бұрын
When you've mastered astrophysics and start messing with nuclear bombs RETROGRADE HOHMANN TRANSFER
@edwinrobert71924 жыл бұрын
Underrated
@KTheStruggler10 жыл бұрын
I FOUND IT! I used your video in a school project I did last year about Nuclear Pulse Propulsion. I later found a different video of yours quite recently and am surprised but not surprised at the same time that you made this video :D
@Icy_vixen10 жыл бұрын
Why are we not funding this?!
@Icy_vixen10 жыл бұрын
Don't forget there are also fusion bombs and fuel pellets with electric beams concepts for Orion since Fission is very inefficient and dirty like you described in the earlier Orion studies. However, we have not created controlled fusion energy with electron beams or anything else, but anything is possible.
@wigster60010 жыл бұрын
***** You do realise that the amount of radiation this would make is rather..... pathetic compared to the radiation a space fairing ship would have to withstand in space.
@Icy_vixen10 жыл бұрын
Are you suggesting ion engines and better nuclear chemical rockets?
@kidlink4OoT10 жыл бұрын
Funding and research would have continued but the "Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty" banned testing nuclear detonations so the project had to be stopped. Honestly it was a stupid idea since this would have been an amazing way to get around the solar system.
@wigster60010 жыл бұрын
I doubt the explosion would cause much of an issue, if the flash of the nuclear bomb is close enough to the earths atmisphere to tough it then it may be a problem, but if the flash has the void of space seperating itself and the earth, then the shockwave can't travel to the earth.
@SteelxWolf11 жыл бұрын
I was doing my science homework after watching this
@kermanguy18779 жыл бұрын
"Well boys, we spent trillions of dollars on nukes, a couple billion on building a damn plane that could use it, and we destroyed the planet in the process. Good work, team!"
@bradynowlan59179 жыл бұрын
Actually, they predicted that getting a rocket to orbit would only create as much pollution as one of the early atomic bomb tests.
@kermanguy18779 жыл бұрын
Brady Nowlan Shut the fuck up. I'm fucking sick and tired of nobody on this fucking site understanding jokes.
@GnanaPrakash86AP9 жыл бұрын
+Brady Nowlan Haha! I think he was referring to how mankind used nukes instead of how they should be used.
@halowraith19 жыл бұрын
+Kerman Guy there wont be a shortage of smartasses anytime soon - especially not on this side of youtube.
@dreadpenguinlord3405 жыл бұрын
My absolute favorite space travel concept! Hilarious how the astronauts were terrified the entire time - though probably realistic.
@Trinzilla9 жыл бұрын
10:13 As Scott said, there is inflation. Factor in said inflation and you get $2,608,342,348,911.97 USD.
@CharTheDude9 жыл бұрын
+Trinzilla Still, that's only about 3.5% of the world's annual GDP. Hell, that's an eighth of the USA's GDP. Point is, if we humans decided we wanted to do it, it's totally possible.
@MrLittlelawyer9 жыл бұрын
+Trinzilla That is for the most massive/fast of the crafts. Furthermore, think about mining and the possible returns of suddenly being able to send not just one or two astronauts, but entire crews of 500-100 people, scientists, engineers, technicians, soldiers, workers, etc into space, and not just them but their equipment/labs.
@racer9272 жыл бұрын
Who else is still a little shocked that KSP 2 will actually have the Orion drive? I still remember seeing some pre-alpha gameplay and went "is that a freaking ORION DRIVE?!"
@omnomnomnom293911 жыл бұрын
your telling me to fly safe? im gonna say that to you scott
@GuitarJammer10 жыл бұрын
This is a really outstanding video! I've been reading Project Orion by George Dyson (Freeman Dyson's son), and you've done a great job covering the history and design features of the project. Got to love KSP for making these kinds of creations possible! What a great game, and fantastic video and commentary!
@jkholtgreve3 жыл бұрын
There’s a documentary based on that research if you poke around KZbin featuring interviews with all the principals who were alive 20 years ago. As fun as it is ultimately sad and infuriating to hear all these old men wax poetic about the math and engineering and imagination that went into it.
@GuitarJammer3 жыл бұрын
@@jkholtgreve Thanks for thé recommendation, I found the doc. After 7 years I suppose I’m due to re-up my research on the project.
@DoNeeh11 жыл бұрын
I seen this on the National Geographic Channel Documentary Evacuate Earth They used Orion project to make them speed up almost a light speed!
@DoNeeh10 жыл бұрын
I like that channel
@Shadow7799910 жыл бұрын
***** an i
@msbuinov92610 жыл бұрын
***** Indeed
@axtmann11 жыл бұрын
I based my design degree work on Project Orion! Thanks for making this video Scott. Lots of fun. The KSP community never ceases to impress.
@ObadiahtheSlim11 жыл бұрын
That nuclear powered plane was anything but flying safe.
@OrionSX11 жыл бұрын
There was a really good book titled "Footfall" in which a Project Orion spacecraft was built out of necessity, after a hostile alien incursion. Might have a look at it, if you're curious. They discuss some of the intricacies of the design in it, as well as turn it into an impromptu weapon.
@nathanschubert30489 жыл бұрын
We are XKCD. We are legion.
@GelatinousSSnake10 жыл бұрын
I just love how the explosion flare lights an entire Kerbin hemisfere lol
@StarmuteVII9 жыл бұрын
Knights of XKCD invade!
@BosonCollider11 жыл бұрын
On a side note, the list of weapons that the USAF planned to stick on their "battleship Orion" version is quite surreal. Basically, enough nukes to vaporize a continent, six hypersonic landing boats, a bunch of Casaba-Howitzers(much stonger version of the propulsion charges, designed for attacking enemy Orions), a dozen of turrets capable of firing the nukes from low orbit into a suborbital trajtectory, and more stuff that still isn't declassified yet. Result: immediate cancellation by JFK.
@Heiryuu11 жыл бұрын
i feel as if this is something that would have been a fallout technology
@KertaDrake3 жыл бұрын
Considering the vending machine aspect, I'd fully expect Nuka-Cola labeling on the bomb launcher.
@tog33345 жыл бұрын
6:00 the looks on the crew's faces is priceless, like they realize just how nuts their ship is.
@KertaDrake3 жыл бұрын
Complete with random flashes of light in the portraits that aren't even occurring in all of them with each explosion... It's like a nuclear rave in the cockpit!
@zacksstuff8 жыл бұрын
I did some math, and it turns out that if you could constantly maintain 1 G thrust for a year, you would reach the speed of light.
@d2factotum8 жыл бұрын
Problem is, as you get closer to lightspeed mass dilation means it takes more energy to go faster--you wouldn't be able to maintain 1G. It would actually require an infinite amount of energy to accelerate any object with mass to lightspeed, but you could get pretty darned close.
@EpochSecutor9 жыл бұрын
I really, really love how you've chosen the Orion project..
@shokteenik8 жыл бұрын
I always thought they'd fire up the nuclear pulse rocket in orbit, not use it for the initial launch. That's just crazy.
@namewarvergeben8 жыл бұрын
They probably would, but this is a videogame ;)
@novasolarius87638 жыл бұрын
No, the Orion was actually meant as a launch system. The way Scott used it is basically the way it was planned to be used IRL.
@kellywilson-lawson18578 жыл бұрын
+Nova Solarius a different design of the Orion was meant to use nukes to get into orbit but the final design would use conventional rockets to get into orbit where it would then use the nukes
@novasolarius87638 жыл бұрын
kelly wilson whitehead Well, that's lame.
@aajjeee8 жыл бұрын
this would be way to heavy to get to orbit and it being worth it
@Sean_73511 жыл бұрын
"In the atmosphere" We're talking about detonating nukes hundreds of kilometers above the atmosphere...
@MegaAwesomeNick8 жыл бұрын
I guess in the case of imminent total planetary annihilation it would be a good design dust off and send a city sized generation ship to the nearest stars thus preserving humanity. OR better, you can go the "Sunshine" route and take all of those valuable nuclear bombs and throw them into the sun because it might help. I still don't get that movie.
@rockspoon65284 жыл бұрын
Far better to secure the galaxy's future by nuking every launch sight, and confining our plague to earth.
@mikeysgametime89144 жыл бұрын
In sunshine they take the nukes to start an artificial self sustaining fusion reaction becuz the sun has stopped
@LarsaXL10 жыл бұрын
I love the last part, that plane is epic, scary and impractical, but still cool.
@vKILLZ0NEv11 жыл бұрын
Has that landing strip always been there!?!?
@yobeefjerky4210 жыл бұрын
yes
@jerrycan17569 жыл бұрын
Scott, Scott... the "Most Kerbal Vehicle Ever" award is limited only by the modding community.
@tardigradegaming213210 жыл бұрын
Hey Scott do u really awnser questions! WOW! Subscribed & Liked
@scottmanley10 жыл бұрын
Yes I answer questions.
@tardigradegaming213210 жыл бұрын
Whoa thanks man! Pewdiepie probably doesnt have time to awnser questions!
@michaelpapadopoulos60549 жыл бұрын
scott have you heard of vsauce?
@shibaplays9 жыл бұрын
Tardi Grade Gaming He replies to comments
@MrGewoonDaan9 жыл бұрын
I can't easily think of a more spectacular way to get rid of nuclear weapons than this right here, make it happen!
@andrehenchenski23109 жыл бұрын
xkcd.com mention this video on the "what if" section on a question about jupter and submarines. (Just in case no one told you yet)
@wolfmannn200810 жыл бұрын
The double wings thing was ingenious :) So creative, so smart, I was amazed!
@加州猫主席8 жыл бұрын
Anyone come here from What If?
@Lutranereis11 жыл бұрын
I independently came up with this idea when I was in high school. I was taking a calculus class and we were discussing parabolic disks and how every point on the disk would sent a signal back to a specific point. I was immediately struck with the thought of a pressure wave hitting one of these plates causing it to move in a single direction. It wasn't much of a jump from there to nuclear bomb powered ships. Story of my life -- I independently invent things decades too late.
@Unclevertitle9 жыл бұрын
1/3 Kerbonaut approved!
@ZarPof11 жыл бұрын
15:10 when you ran out of RCS, you could have transfered it. But either way, good science and history lesson. And the way you freeball your course corrections, no plotting with the auto targeting computers, is rather impressive.
@lunafoxfire9 жыл бұрын
So what you're saying is that RIGHT NOW we have the technology to launch a rocket the size of a small city to 10% of the speed of light. WHY ARE WE NOT DOING THIS?! HOLY CRAP WE COULD BE AT PROXIMA CENTAURI WITHIN 50 YEARS (actually probably longer than that because you'd have to accelerate and then slow down again but still).
@TheBalefire9 жыл бұрын
LydianLights Because it would cost several trillion dollars, and irradiate the planet when it left....
@TheRambo0109 жыл бұрын
LydianLights u really did not got what happens whe you use this in the atmosphere? Its like, if u have a fallout in ur city, at next day, every single person is DEAD
@IAmTehEllie9 жыл бұрын
TheBalefire meh, radiatiion makes things more interesting anyway i want 3 heads!!
@jdlessl9 жыл бұрын
LydianLights Because "nukes are bad!". In truth, the environmental consequences aren't great, but then neither is burning the downright toxic crap that chemical rockets use. Or, for that matter, coal power plants, which release enough uranium into the air that the potential fissionable energy thereof actually exceeds the energy you get from burning the coal. The warheads used would not be big city-buster types, but much smaller, so EMPs would be much less of an issue.
@jdlessl9 жыл бұрын
TheBalefire No, the whole point is that pulsedrives are insanely _cheap_ compared to chemical rockets. And no, if the 2000+ nuclear test bombs detonated since 1945 haven't irradiated the planet, then this wouldn't either.
@adammullarkey49965 жыл бұрын
"...no, the most Kerbal vehicle award goes-" KZbin: Screw you, have an ad!
@giaxo1739 Жыл бұрын
Hi from xkcd!
@tehlastcenturion11 жыл бұрын
as far as I can tell by the recourses about the project put on the internet, this was indeed meant as a means of interplanetary flight meant to get their more quickly so that the time spent in space would be minimal, and it seems a very efficient means of doing that!
@whiterottenrabbit10 жыл бұрын
And the pilots only slightly broke the airplane :D
@bevvox9 жыл бұрын
Come to think of it, maybe we should use a magnetic pillow instead of a physical "pusher plate" to absorb and translate the energy, plasma, kinetic, etc. Much like the designs for a room temperature thermonuclear fusion, with superfluidic, superconductive barriers to protect the actual device/generator/container...
@georgeevans90449 жыл бұрын
Hail xkcd! View count as of now: 264,442. Lets see what happens.
@Ink_258 жыл бұрын
above 400,000 views at the moment
@DiverseGamingLeague11 жыл бұрын
I actually did my senior year research paper on orion rockets!!
@Hunter-we8ve10 жыл бұрын
"Fly safe"
@SINDRIKARL110 жыл бұрын
Yeah, he once mentioned that he's pushing that phrase as a joke XD At least for that specific video.
@bevvox9 жыл бұрын
Funny thing you've mentioned the 15g specifically, that was the required upper limit for passing centrifugal tests the Soviet cosmonauts, they were forced to endure said stress while continuing to function(as opposed to Apollo era's US astronauts 13gs), explains why there were so few space goers back then, among other things... Like their short lifespans... After all most of them weren't preparing for this their whole lives, at least not to that extent that is, granted they all had excessive military training, but even so... As things stand now, as far as I know, currently virtually nobody is being trained to that rigorous extent
@kit01349 жыл бұрын
XKCD sent me here o.o
@DoRC7 жыл бұрын
Iike how the nukes going off automatically set all the Kerbals faces to terrified the whole time
@PixelGarett10 жыл бұрын
This was acually invented to travel light years. The propulsion will get you going about lightspeed in space. It was invented as a resource for another planet to live on incase we needed it, but the nearest solar system is lightyears away. With this idea they could build a massive massive spaceship that could travel the 6 lightyears in 100 years. It was basically a whole community inside a massive spaceship. They would have babies in space which they would have been able to see the new planet they could live on but there parents could not. This was not a stupid idea. If NASA had the money, they would without a doubt build this.
@Edgewalker00110 жыл бұрын
A generation style colony ship. Yeah, it's not a bad idea, but you once again run into the spam in a can problem. People do not take well to being stuck inside a giant tin can for a hundred years.
@PixelGarett10 жыл бұрын
***** Yes, but also it was a last resort, they would have to deal with it. They cant get out of it even if they wanted to.
@tankmodeler10 жыл бұрын
GarageGamer, I'm sorry, but it was never designed to travel light years. It was designed, from the start, as a way to push a lot of mass into orbit and then to rapidly explore the solar system, getting to Saturn in 2-3 months. Interstellar travel was never iamgined as the systems to survive that long were not within the scope of the program. There is a great history of the program written by Freeman Dyson's son 8-10 eyars ago.
@PixelGarett10 жыл бұрын
tankmodeler Okay thanks for the info! I watched a documentry on it also where it would use the exact same concept of the engine and build a colony in space, off of that idea, it would go and travel one light year in 16 years or so and the full 6 light years to get to the next solar system or the next closest star to hopefully to find another habbital planet to stay on and repopulate to create a new world, The Documenty is called The Orion Effect Its pretty amazing the stuff they talk about and the animations they do in it.
@General12th9 жыл бұрын
TheGarageGamer98 Although tankmodeler is right in that the original Project Orion was never intended for interstellar travel, more thoughts on the subject came in the following decades. Project Daedalus is one example, although it was planned as a rapid flyby. Project Longshot would achieve an actual orbit around Alpha Centauri using even less hypothetical technology. Project Icarus would also achieve orbit, but in less time and with an entirely different drive system (so I don't really know why I'm listing it as an example). All in all, it seems that nuclear pulse propulsion *could* be scaled up to provide interstellar travel to humans. There's not really a maximum yield of the bombs used or a maximum size of the ship, so at some point, manned interstellar trips would be achievable. Such journeys would take several decades, though, so it might be a lot easier to popsiclize the crew. That would save weight on food, water, and living space; not to mention the original crew would enjoy the fruits of their sacrifices. I don't predict there will be many (if any) interstellar missions, manned or otherwise, launched this century. There will probably be some launched next century. Given the rapid advancement of medical and life-extending technology, it's not unlikely that both you and I will live to see them.
@thetau1211 жыл бұрын
Megaton - TNT equivalent is a method of quantifying the energy released in explosions.so eg power relesed (blow up) by. 1 megaton nuke = 1 million tons of TNT
@sicus09 жыл бұрын
The prototype video with chemical explosives, Scott mentioned, can be watched here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/q4Kmo4OEetiEl7s
@SonakaG11 жыл бұрын
close to the ending of the video, right when he is flying towards the island, you can see the kerbal on the left panicking, the kerbal in the middle panicking, and the kerbal on the right COMPLETELY HAPPY with smiles. I WAS LAUGHING at the sight of this.
@will2dye49 жыл бұрын
xkcd brought me here :)
@nathanjqn111 жыл бұрын
The retraction is the explosive force which pushes the spacecraft. It's expansion is not enough to stop the spacecraft either. It works trust Mr. Manley. Mod's pretty fun too.
@AluVixapede11 жыл бұрын
Project put-put \o/
@CuzicanAerospace9 жыл бұрын
If nobody mentioned this yet--KSP forum user TiktaalikDreaming (AKA Dogmatic Pyrrhonist) has created more parts to go with Nyrath's Orion drive, and I believe has also retextured the drive to make it more stockalike. (The IVAs are really nice--they reminded me of the rocket interior scenes in *Destination Moon*.) forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/112077-TD-Industries-Orion-bits-Alpha
@johncarter37289 жыл бұрын
Lose the unbypassable advertisements, KZbin. Downvoted.
@scottmanley9 жыл бұрын
+John Carter You aren't getting hit by that AdBlock bug are you?
@maxzero96479 жыл бұрын
+John Carter Have you tried AdBlock Edge? It's a pretty decent fork!
@pmcburn19 жыл бұрын
+John Carter yes. How dare people monetize their own content.
@johncarter37289 жыл бұрын
What other recourse is left? Don't allow KZbin to run advertisements on your channel, if downvotes are an issue. I'll not be subjected to an involuntary waste of my time.
@pmcburn19 жыл бұрын
+John Carter Then watch another channel. The author has the right to monetize his content. You have the right to piss off.
@bevvox9 жыл бұрын
For finer maneuvers we can always use more standard rcs thrusters, deployed then necessary, internally hidden for protection while under full speed
@Edgewalker00110 жыл бұрын
"Likes to think big" Yeah, for a guy that proposed using all the mass in a solar system to build a shell around the system primary and then harness all the energy generated. That may be the most appropriate statement ever. Even though he then came up with the idea of a satellite cloud that could do more or less the same thing with much less mass used. And then Larry Niven came up with the Ringworld idea which is kind of the best of both worlds, but would require even crazier materials to work.
@WinchellChung11 жыл бұрын
Yes, you are correct. Throttle from 1% to 30% make detonation interval every 1.5 seconds. 30% to 60% is every 1 second. 60% to 100% is every 0.8 second. So the 3.5MN bomb detonated every 0.8 second is 3.5 / 0.8 = 4.4MN thrust
@johnmothershead16904 жыл бұрын
Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle used this concept in their novel Footfall (Del Rey Books, 1985). The basic plot is the old, old sci-fi standard: aliens show up in a big ship and invade Earth and we humans band together to get rid of them. In this case we secretly build an Orion vehicle in Bellingham harbor, named "Michael", and launch it into orbit to attack the Fithp mother ship, complete with all four Space Shuttle Orbiters strapped on the outside, with ETs, plus numerous nuclear missles and particle beam weapons powered by the propulsion bombs.
@jessemckeown56288 жыл бұрын
I'm impressed by how the pulses visibly illuminate night side kerbin.
@BobzeMovie11 жыл бұрын
sound can travel through any material. As long as there is something there, sound can move through it, not just oxygen. So in the cockpit there would be sound from it travelling through the metal in the ship and through the helmet then through the ears.
@tardigradegaming213210 жыл бұрын
Hey Scott! 0:55 Now there is no gravity in Kerbins atmosphere! Woaw!
@WarDaft9 жыл бұрын
I don't know if this has been mentioned, but the largest designs for project Orion had spacecraft weighing TEN MILLION tonnes, not eight thousand. The largest class of aircraft carriers never even reached a hundred thousand tonnes. We're talking about a ship that could lift an aircraft carrier and a *berth for it to float in* into space, and then take it anywhere in the solar system in a reasonable amount of time (or to another star if everyone involved is reeeally patient), without this even being a significant portion of it's cargo weight limit.
@AbazeStudio11 жыл бұрын
"them we'll trim the orbit using the smaller nukes" I find this sentence incredibly ironic
@MechMan012411 жыл бұрын
High velocity plasma hitting the pusher plate provides the thrust. The projects physicists had designed micro-warheads that would produce a cigar-shaped jet of plasma directed at the pusher plate and out the back. No need for air to propagate the energy. Check out the book on Amazon if you're interested, it's a great read: "Project Orion: The True Story of the Atomic Spaceship by George Dyson". It goes into quite a bit of detail on the physics.
@WinchellChung11 жыл бұрын
Yes, that is true. The smaller devices are so inefficient that not all the fissionable material in the bomb is consumed. The other source of fallout is dirt from the ground that is neutron activated. Using a launch pad of armor plate coated with graphite eliminates that fallout.
@MegaTNTCreeper11 жыл бұрын
Correct. Sound waves can be transmitted through any particles, and they would in fact travel better through the craft.
@greenlight2k11 жыл бұрын
18:18 "I call Shenanigans!" XD ---- gotta love this guy ;)
@albatrossboss9 жыл бұрын
Scott Manley How does it feel to get linked to from XKCD as the most Kerbal vehicle ever built?
@KoobztheShawk9 жыл бұрын
Using an extra set of wings to permanently pitch it "up" Gimbal Lock eat your heart out.
@MusicVideoFun11 жыл бұрын
funny thing is this concept of nuclear powered rockets by bombs was a idea revealed to government but the gov. decided to classify it then several years latter leave it due to the no nuclear bombs treaty thing
@WinchellChung11 жыл бұрын
The USAF 10 meter Orion the mod is based on made artificial gravity by being a "tumbling pigeon", rotating end over end. But there was a design that had rotating arms, which folded down flat for periods of acceleration.
@Mazzinwx2 ай бұрын
Coming from 'what-if xkcd' :) The concept of Nuclear-bomb-propelled spacecraft reminds me of the one from Dan Simmons' Ilium-Olympos books
@HiroNguy4 жыл бұрын
Dude this is Bad Ass! Love the rapid fire nuclear blasts!
@LarryPhischman11 жыл бұрын
Apparently Dyson and his team figured out how to make a relatively clean nuclear warhead, with an unusually efficient fission primary.
@Tulio50911 жыл бұрын
"Fly safe", he says. After this video, it's one of the strongest examples of "Do what I say, don't do what I do"