Is the lesson we’ve learned here that bitter old Englishmen shouldn’t be allowed to make films about the most famous French military commander in history?
@joelogan628611 ай бұрын
He’s not a historian . He’s a director that tells stories. I don’t understand why people are upset about a fictional movie .
@TriggeringOpinionsandFacts11 ай бұрын
@@joelogan6286people are upset because it disrespects a well respected and reasonably inspirational historical figure . It’s really stupid how people come to say what you’re saying. It’s obvious. Why is kingdom of heaven (directors cut) not universally hated for the same reason ? Because it captures the spirit and respects the legendary figures in the movie (Baldwin and Saladin). It shows the characters the respect and humanity that they were described with by others. Napoleon does none of this. It is both inaccurate (as was KoH) and disrespectful/reductive (as KoH certainly was not).
@horatiohuskisson547111 ай бұрын
@@joelogan6286 the real story is way more interesting than watching an Englishmen shit on the memory of Napoleon
@wesleydesantanadasilva11 ай бұрын
@@joelogan6286oh amigo o gênero do filme é "histórico" e não "ficção científica". oh friend, the genre of the film is "historical" and not "science fiction".😊
@red.s1k11 ай бұрын
@@Player-unknown93 But how are people supposed to know that? Every person who is not an admirer of history would assume that this is the great Napoleon. It sets a precedent for future films about historical figures and their stories that could shape their place in history because a director decided to get a bit creative
@leonardlopez410611 ай бұрын
I love how the French army always respected and followed Napoleon until their end. Those guys didn't want France to go back to the old days and Napoleon always took care of his soldiers to the greatest extent that he could.
@tiagomonteiro13011 ай бұрын
Leaders who were former military members tent to have a better relationship with Soldiers then leaders who weren't, they know how the average Soldier feels and what problems they face, this movie is still a disgrace to Napoleon thoe.
@BelowLow11 ай бұрын
r u napoleon? @@tiagomonteiro130
@gusfring688711 ай бұрын
@@tiagomonteiro130this movie portrays Napoleon as an old, cowardly, bitter man when in reality he was charismatic, highly loved, highly intelligent, and a brilliant leader overall. Ridley is just a bitter old Englishman and should have never made this multi million dollar pile of crap!
@Ma1q44411 ай бұрын
The French Revolution accomplished nothing and was destructive
@Renaud-z5f11 ай бұрын
@@gusfring6887 Scott made one of the best movies one french napoleonic ages ; the duellists. It was his first film. A pictural movie with painting references inspired by a true history of two french hussards. See this film if you do not know.
@yuantheone11 ай бұрын
I used to think that this movie was a tragedy.. But now I realize it's a comedy..
@KingBowser7776611 ай бұрын
Nice Joker reference 😂
@hamzamahmood956510 ай бұрын
All I have....are negative reviews!
@danieltobin449810 ай бұрын
If you view it more as a comedy it’s more watchable
@Tartaro-mq3uj10 ай бұрын
the part when he falls off the stairs reminds me of the Joker perssecution
@Knightfall_2610 ай бұрын
Nice reference lol. 😂
@LiongKeatLimUSM11 ай бұрын
0:49 Napoleon quoted "Oh f*ck." while falling down the stairs
@thethreeedgedsword725311 ай бұрын
Hahahahahahahaha omg
@AntonyMB10 ай бұрын
If the French dub says 'oh p*tain* that would be hilarious 😂
@kamix890410 ай бұрын
I would do same thing so can we blame him ?
@greekorthodoxmonarchist10 ай бұрын
I almoast died of laughing! hahahaha
@EzekielDeLaCroix6 ай бұрын
Oh cuck!
@christopherf891211 ай бұрын
Honestly, this scene could have passed in a batter movie. It’s a good balance of ridiculousness and history that would fit well in a movie that was actually coherent.
@KINGBIMP11 ай бұрын
Scene *
@christopherf891211 ай бұрын
@@KINGBIMP sorry this was posted in that 1 am mode of thought, fixed now
@williamhinton325111 ай бұрын
Could fit in a Death of Stalin-esque version of the coup
@Getoffmearse11 ай бұрын
People often mention how evil he was after Russia, but if that were true, why would men follow him after, even willing to help him regain power without a single soldier shooting him after orders from their king? I don’t think an evil man would be alive after all of that, that’s why I respect the absolute fck out of Napoleon
@JuicedOnKids10 ай бұрын
@@GetoffmearseHitler also had loyal followers after his death. People will follow what/who they think is right.
@andrewfowler855811 ай бұрын
This is giving Monty Python but with a $120 million budget 😂
@sleepydesigner10 ай бұрын
Lol😂😂
@CptBEARDless7 ай бұрын
Ah yes because you were there
@rebmerf56227 ай бұрын
@@CptBEARDless No, but other people where, and they wrote it down.
@eiavops45767 ай бұрын
@@CptBEARDlessWhy is it so hard to assume he watched the movie?
@cantinadudes4 ай бұрын
To be fair monty python is surprisingly accurate sometimes
@federicoitalico742511 ай бұрын
In reality the eyewitnesses described a different scene: the deputies attempted to attack Napoleon, between him and them some grenadiers intervened who made the general reach the exit by making him pass over their heads, passing him from hand to hand, as the fans during concerts with rock stars throwing themselves from the stage. The minimum height to become a grenadier was, I think, 180cm, Napoleon was 165cm tall and then quite slim. Less spectacular scene than in the film, but that's how it is.
@Ma1q44411 ай бұрын
What do you mean “pass over their heads” and “passing him from hand to hand”
@JohnCena-le1jj11 ай бұрын
@@Ma1q444They lifted him up above their heads and passed him between each other
@delta5-12610 ай бұрын
@@JohnCena-le1jjLike hot potato?
@dolsopolar10 ай бұрын
thats probably even more spectacular and hilarious. but nope. history is boring !!
@RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus10 ай бұрын
@@delta5-126 they did crowd surfing
@CoolSmoovie11 ай бұрын
Ridley Scott made Blackhawk Down. One of the most faithful military movies of all time. Seriously it’s 1 to 1 with the book. Then makes…this. This must have been an intentional hit piece on Napoleon
@MrTerrorist10 ай бұрын
Actually it wasn't accurate since the UN forces that rescue the US forces were actually Malaysian and not Indian. Furthermore, some Malaysian Peacekeepers died rescuing those US soldiers yet the film omitted their contribution but instead portray the peacekeepers just transporting the injured. Naturally, Malaysian weren't please their soldiers weren't given respect for their help in that movie.
@fallaciousfirm252410 ай бұрын
@@MrTerrorist irl there were both Malaysian and Pakistani troops to rescue them
@redbloodcell404710 ай бұрын
@@MrTerrorist I haven't watched the movie in a while, but I remember them mentioning Pakistani forces and according to Wikipedia, they also mentioned Malaysian forces, both as part of the UN rescue convoy. Criticism about dismissing the role of the Pakistani/Malaysian forces came from both countries, not just Malaysia. But it isn't surprising that the film focused on Americans, as introducing new factions at the end of the movie would have disrupted the narrative pacing, even if it would have been more accurate. There's also the merging of individuals into single characters, which is often done in films to reduce the narrative noise when there are too many characters/actors involved in the plot. Some relatively small logistical decisions were changed. Besides that the film is a reasonable portrayal of the events, seemingly far better than Napoleon. That being said I wouldn't treat any piece of media as historical fact. I find criticising movie accuracy a bit pointless because it is not advisable (nor possible) for directors to perfectly recreate history or even other works of fiction. Accuracy often gets in the way of an entertaining story, disrupting pace, etc.
@CoolSmoovie10 ай бұрын
@@MrTerrorist I said accurate to the book.
@sergeymeshkov10 ай бұрын
no I am sad that we could have Black Hawk Down in napoleonic era, instead we got a romantic comedy in costumes
@cesaralarcon522811 ай бұрын
With the tons of information available about this historical event and Ridley Scott comes around and fails miserably
@chrismarple11 ай бұрын
Ridley Scott should never be allowed to direct a history movie again
@Red_hoodeditz9 ай бұрын
You shouldn't watch it then
@Potaters129 ай бұрын
I thought the same thing after Gladiator.
@jarvy2519 ай бұрын
@@Red_hoodeditz I didn't
@justinv1209 ай бұрын
Why not?
@eggwitheyez5 ай бұрын
Why? It's a movie, it's meant to be far fetched and exaggerated. I don't know what you people expect.
@tiyonbaret691411 ай бұрын
1:36 that little look he gave him when he said I’ll kill him like “What? I have to sell this, just go with it.”
@pimmyflores873911 ай бұрын
The problem with this movie is that Ridley Scott tried to fit his entire adult life into a movie. Needed to show his rise to power as a general 1799-1804. THEN the second movie would show him emperor, 1804-1815.
@Deerhunter6064110 ай бұрын
Nah, better move would be 1799-1804, 1805-1812, then 1812-1815x alternatively. 1799-1804 Rise of Napoleon, 1805-1809 Rise of an Empire, 1809-1814 Fall of an Empire, 1815 Napoleons Return
@Freedmoon447 ай бұрын
@@Deerhunter60641i love how you guys are saying 1799-1804 and all, but he was a well established general in 1796-7 in the war with Italy Started his rise in 1793 and theres honestly alot more to say prior with his corsican indeoandantist ide1 his falling out with Paoli his expedition in Piedmont Sardigna his time out of job for refusing to participate in the Vendée conflict. Theres so much of this not really known
@ChrisCrossClash6 ай бұрын
It would have been so much better as a mini series
@Worldhistory-1235 ай бұрын
@@Freedmoon44 There is no war between Italy and France, the Italy already surrendered without arm conflict and joined their army to Napoleon's army.
@Hamilton-bm4qj3 ай бұрын
Exactly. You could have made a movie about a single campaign, let alone the multiple wars.
@loyalpiper11 ай бұрын
1:16 this film was so bad that this was funny
@rainbowchap697311 ай бұрын
"Theyre trying to kill me" "Theyre trying to kill him" *hits someone at the door aggressively* Its like its out of a sitcom
@zenpai59989 ай бұрын
@@rainbowchap6973😭😭
@pancakemacbuttery91426 ай бұрын
Scott is British, and his British ancestors told him to make Napoleon so shitty 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@alfredhauchfox20736 ай бұрын
@@rainbowchap6973I think it’s meant to be like this? He is being pathetic in this scene. Panicking? I dont see anything bad about this
@L_LGBTQ6 ай бұрын
Its supposed to be funny, its a comedy movie
@tboengland734311 ай бұрын
My idol is Napoleon. I have studied Napoleon, I love his history. I don’t know what kind of mad man Ridley Scott is but Joaquin Phoenix portrayed him like a scumbag clown. Sure, after the coup, after, propaganda spread that Napoleon was stabbed or the 500 attempted to stab him, and one grenadier even got his sleeve ripped in the ordeal and received a pension. Napoleon is portrayed in this as a sad, desperate power h hungry nutter.
@therearenoshortcuts986811 ай бұрын
his father was a mudder and his mother was a nutter
@Moffee91111 ай бұрын
Careful, we got someone who was actually there when this happened in that chat.
@1hasanraza11 ай бұрын
Worst movie they could ever make on Napoleon
@rutiloromero44611 ай бұрын
Joaquin had the look for this role but wasn't commanding enough with his persona.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
Your idol is a deranged delusional tyrant who seized a powerful military from a lost and confused nation, waging total war ending in total defeat at the cost of millions of lives?! You must also idolize Hitler then.
@TheBerylknight11 ай бұрын
Phoenix is one of the greatest actors alive. So the fact he sucks so bad in this film just shows what a terrible director Scott has become. You can give him hundreds of millions of dollars and the very best actors, and he'll still find a way to make it awful.
@maaz3229 ай бұрын
Phoenix is good, but I would question his breadth. What is Phoenix famous for?? Self abusing and loathing men who have tragic demises often. He played Johnny Cash, Joker, and Emperor Commodus, they're all similar archetypes of self-abusing men who are tragic in some sense. They should not have casted him, he doesn't play the part of a deliberately inspiring and rousing man, in control of his fate. Phoenix is more of the tragic loser who is thrust into path he never asked for.
@TheBerylknight9 ай бұрын
@@maaz322I think it is more that you haven't seen enough of his work instead of the actor's "breadth". Check out Buffalo Soldiers or We Own the Night as two quick examples - if you want to see him play charismatic characters who aren't "tragic losers". He's really good at those too. The problem is Ridley Scott. The same thing happened when he tried to make Robin Hood. He had some of the very best actors in the business and hundreds of millions - and still churned out mediocrity.
@Freedmoon447 ай бұрын
Phoenix as great he may be simply isnt fit to be Napoleon. Napoleon in 1814-5? Yes definitly, but not Napoleon when he was in his twenties and early thirties ffs, he doesnt have the energy of youth unlike Napoleon who historically did, he either seemed stoic half the time when Napoleon wore his emotions on his shoulders. His portrayal as the anglo saxon stereotype of Napoleon doesnt give Napoleon justice. He is not a bad actor, and Scott messed up hard, but he is not the right actor to play Napoleon either
@TheBerylknight7 ай бұрын
@@Freedmoon44 Phoenix recently played the Joker, who had enough manic energy to make Napoleon look like he was in a coma. So the actor had plenty of energy for the role. I'm confident the problem was Ridley's direction. He made Russel Crow boring as Robin Hood, Christian Bale boring as Moses, and now Joaquin Phoenix boring as Napoleon. These are all great actors who know how to bring vitality to their roles under the stewardship of a competent director.
@colonel10036 ай бұрын
Joaquin was a bad casting choice, looks nothing like Napoleon and just uses his regular voice
@illinoismotionpicturestudi506511 ай бұрын
0:48 It was worth the price of admission just to see those two seconds, I remember that taking everyone off guard in the theater lol
@simonhoogeveen7213Ай бұрын
shut up
@GobblinDeez11 ай бұрын
I love the "They tried to kill me!" *points* "They tried to kill him."
@Rohv10 ай бұрын
My first problem with the movie is that they would try to squeeze Napoleon's whole eventful life in 2 to 3 hours. However, watching this short scene would show that there are other issues with the movie. You can hate Napoleon, but do not deny his genius and charisma. Here, he is made to look like an incompetent buffoon.
@kellenlean20765 ай бұрын
0:32 those punches were some of the worst I’ve seen in a movie😭😭😭
@heh93923 ай бұрын
The whole movie was terrible, making a mockery of my idol.
@EzraMerr3 ай бұрын
That is actually how some people punch lol
@kraanz2 ай бұрын
I liked the ones where he was punching his own guard's arm on the doors.
@Battletoasta11 ай бұрын
Richard Sharpe would never allow this to happen
@angelfan1611 ай бұрын
Not soldiering.
@tombowers671310 ай бұрын
He only saw boney in the show
@ConfusedRevolutionary9 ай бұрын
A man who loses the king’s colours loses the king’s friendship.
@angelfan169 ай бұрын
@@ConfusedRevolutionary I have a cousin at horse guards and I have friends at court.
@nicmagtaan11324 ай бұрын
If Sharpe was french, he would be a marshal by the time of Waterloo
@Danymok9 ай бұрын
What is Napoleon doing in Britain?!?
@parisgorospe77096 ай бұрын
They trying to kill me
@biggerboatfilmquiz765111 ай бұрын
ooof that extra looking right into the lens and then shuffling back to make space for camera crew at 2:22
@chandlersnyder30811 ай бұрын
They should’ve made the battle of Waterloo better like the movie of war and peace.
@orientalflux11 ай бұрын
agree
@Skyraider356F6 ай бұрын
War and Peace didn't mention the battle of Waterloo, you're referring to the movie of the same name, including the same director as the Soviet film version.
@MaryTudor282836 ай бұрын
And since the movie is basically a comedy, just play Waterloo by ABBA after it
@DngrDan11 ай бұрын
I'm so glad people are catching onto how much of a turd Ridley Scott has become. Every movie he makes now is just a hot take on history where every male character is either a coward or a complete bastard.
@horsemann735411 ай бұрын
Ridley Scott literally depicts Napoleon as a brave leader who rides headfirst into battle, saber in hand. That is the opposite of portraying as a coward, especially when his enemies in the movie never lead their men in battle.
@sheaconn260511 ай бұрын
you dont know what you were talking about an he were tiny
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
And some people are catching on to what a total loser Napoleon was, despite European narratives of glory and triumph. Nothing more than a deranged delusional demagogue of a tyrant who seized a powerful military from a lost and confused nation, waging total war ending in total defeat at the cost of millions of lives.
@samuelstephen814711 ай бұрын
He didn’t didn’t lead his men in charges like that, but he was still without doing that@@horsemann7354.
@VRichardsn11 ай бұрын
@@horsemann7354 His Napoleon is nothing like the real life man. Where is the charisma, the magnetic attraction? He instead appears more like a military autist, highly gifted for battle, but incapable of charming anyone. And then we have the battles, that happened nowhere near how they are depicted in the film.
@thegoldenminion808811 ай бұрын
bro idk why but i laughed at the part where he said ""they tried to kill me" and his brother says "they tried to kill him"
@Jogo-6211 ай бұрын
Wasn't Murat the one who led the troops in?
@joshuagrover7954 ай бұрын
"Citizens, you are dissolved!" and "Get this damn fucking ramble out." Really disappointed not to see the "Dandy King" since he commanded the 6,000 troops that surrounded the building.
@inigobantok15793 ай бұрын
not to mention that they didnt show that they had to convince the 400 man legislative guard of both councils.@@joshuagrover795
@federicoitalico742511 ай бұрын
Love how Lucien, the president of the chamber, hit the deputies from his podium😂
@diegoandrade46710 ай бұрын
Not even kidding, when it became apparent that this movie wasn't as serious or historically accurate, I saw 2 people walk out. I enjoyed it though, it was super funny.
@sp0od3r8111 ай бұрын
Now that's a movie when the cameraman is being pushed around too😮😅🎉😊
@ln53218 ай бұрын
"You're telling me that you found the crown of France in the gutter?" "I did, and I'm tired of pretending I didn't."
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
0:50-I love that how he yells ‘Oh f-k!’ in English! 🤣🤣🤣
@waynedugger769711 ай бұрын
I love how the whole damn movie is English lol. They couldn't even use a French accent at least 🙄
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
@@waynedugger7697 Agreed! I mean, I didn’t expect Joaquin, Phoenix to learn French overnight, but Jesus Christ this movie was lazy!
@waynedugger769711 ай бұрын
@@KHoltzie lol I'm such a history buff.. and so disappointed in this
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
@@waynedugger7697 I know I feel like they could’ve pumped a little more authenticity into it, I think Scott just got lazy
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
@@waynedugger7697 i’m still going to go see it anyway, I don’t like that word of mouth thing, I have to see it with my own two eyes for a genuine inference
@hanpolo272711 ай бұрын
By the looks of the comments, a percentage of people dont like this scene (or the film.) But could we give Pheonix creadit when its due? For me its him falling down the stairs before instantly getting back up and running. Good job to him.
@Daniel_P11611 ай бұрын
Those were stunt stairs. They go through a lot of training.
@Jonny-uu7wf5 ай бұрын
He is a fantastic actor but he deserves no credit. Actors are meant to embody the character they are playing. He disembodied Napoleon.
@feelingsfeelings.28483 ай бұрын
@@Jonny-uu7wfI blame Scott Ridley for the absolutely terrible script, Phoenix had potential.
@nedgoldreyer876110 ай бұрын
At 2:02 the window in the center of the shot suddenly goes dark, as if an electrical light is turning off. Anyone know what's going on there?
@ayushchaudhari56559 ай бұрын
That's just a video artefact ig
@VaporPC882 ай бұрын
0:45 and yet he’s still have the character joker on him
@ShodaiGojira-xn3xk11 ай бұрын
This whole scene looks like something Horrible Histories would do for one of their news skits
@ryleeculla55703 ай бұрын
If you look at painting and look at the actor as Napoleon you can understand why he looks like that plus we don’t even know his actual face paintings aren’t always accurate
@ChandraadithyaGonnabhaktula9 ай бұрын
Bro’s like oh F*ck when falling down
@mr.tobacco170811 ай бұрын
I mean rather than making a speech if he just said "They tried to kill Napoleon." Those Guards would instantly go in there to bash those politicans heads open just because they 'think' about harming Napoleon :D
@joshuagrover7954 ай бұрын
In reality, while Napoleon was confronting the Council of 500, he was flanked by Grenadiers, and they pulled him cleared and dragged him outside, when the situation started to become ugly.
@middleguard18366 ай бұрын
Epic history did it better.
@mitrooper11 ай бұрын
The thumbnail says it all. Ridley Scott goofed-up on this one.
@aaroniousairlines908710 ай бұрын
2:00 where did that light come from?
@parisgorospe77097 ай бұрын
silent Thunder maybe
@Zurfreye4 ай бұрын
That looks a little glitchy
@TyCook-s1c3 ай бұрын
Jesus Christ
@StraightShooter.11 ай бұрын
It's like John Wayne playing Genghis Khan. Wasn't the best choice for that part. In Napoleon, I feel like I am watching Johnny Cash playing the part.
@davideiceman11 ай бұрын
Lord Larys helped Napoleon stage his coup d'Etat!
@mathieuhage47478 ай бұрын
i like the fact where he had like 50 old guard on stand by at the door
@feelingsfeelings.28483 ай бұрын
Napoleon usually keep his most elite guards close to him whenever he go
@KingBowser7776611 ай бұрын
Joaquin Phoenix is a comedic actor genious
@kiergarcia67073 ай бұрын
Is that Larry's clubfoot from fire and blood
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
I gotta hand it to the guy- Napoleon was all intellect, he was a smart small MFer…every battle is won BEFORE its ever fought! ✊🏻🇫🇷
@ALBERTOtheExplora11 ай бұрын
Napoleon wasn't actually small. He was actually an imposing figure.
@KingsStream11 ай бұрын
5'6" isn't what i call small.. i was honestly thinking he was shorter than that to be honest.
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
@@KingsStreamWhat??? You don’t think 5’6 is small???
@KingsStream11 ай бұрын
@@KHoltzietodays standards?? Nope
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
@@KingsStream We’re not talking about today though we’re talking about back then, at least I am
@nehemiahstewart6 ай бұрын
Those that did not appreciate the light humor in this film do your research on the man that Napolean was. He was known to enjoy humor and be a little goofy at times.
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
I’m gonna go see this one tomorrow-my only qualm with it is that I wish they’d a used more French actors and dialogue…it just doesn’t feel as authentic as it should with him speaking in English all the time! 🤷🏼♂️
@1hasanraza11 ай бұрын
Please don't waste your time and money. Worst possible movie made on Napoleon
@castafioreomg11 ай бұрын
That too Queens English yikes
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
@@1hasanraza i’ll take that into consideration, what did this get on rotten tomatoes???
@townsley211 ай бұрын
don't mind the stupid negative reviews on social, it's actually a good movie (the best made on Napoleon so far). There are downsides of course (nothing on his immense heritage with regards to culture, politics, law, egyptology etc. nothing on the campaigns of Italy and Spain either, and the portrayal of his relationship with Josephine is a bit awkward), but the 4 battle scenes are great, so are the settings and the costumes) and it depicts a more human Napoleon than any other film. Can't wait for the director's cut version on apple +
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
@@townsley2 I know, I hear what you’re saying and I totally agree, I’m not really one for that word of mouth shit, I’d rather go see the film myself and draw my own inferences!
@albion608710 ай бұрын
frankly I really liked this film, I know people gripe about the accuracy, but if anything to me it made napoleon feel more human.
@frechdachswien10 ай бұрын
Frankly, there are much better movies about Napoleon's life (for example: 2002 with Christian Clavier)
@Freedmoon447 ай бұрын
Except he already feels human as hell if you look at history and respects it, like half the time his quotes on his marshalls depands on his mood one day "this man is the greatest" the next "ive never seen a bigger piece of s in my life". You read the true history of the coup of Brumaire and realise that the reason why he stole power was because people like Sièyes, Talleyrand, Lucien, Moreau, Murat and Lefebvre i think was on his side, but at one point he totally lost his patience went in too early and kinda failed the diplomatic route as he lost his confidence nothing so dramatic as him running away in disgrace there were grenadier who took him outside and held the door to the corridor while Napoleon came outside and used the excuse that Lucien was held against his will to get the military to aid. The day prior he slept with 2 loaded pistols because he was preparing for a coup. He seems bigger than life when you see what he accomplished, but theres a definitive line between depicting him as a lucky power hungry buffoon who is carried by others to where he was, and his talent and genius brought to its best when other people supports him. Showing incompetance doesnt make you more human, it only makes you more relatable, but we dont need to relate to Napoleon really.
@feelingsfeelings.28483 ай бұрын
As if smiing him a fussy man-child is the only way to humanize him, there's more to Napoleon then having a food fight with Josephine.
@napoleonicmango80611 ай бұрын
Portrayed Napoleon like a wuss, horrible movie
@ryanmiller519911 ай бұрын
2:06 when he is walking back up and backup has arrived. That’s powerful
@christophermichaelclarence600311 ай бұрын
As French. This anticipated movie is a huge letdown. Really out of context from the History Facts. I remember when I was in high school. We had a test subject about Napoleon Bonaparte and his conquest. I couldn’t fail it
@christophermichaelclarence600311 ай бұрын
As French. This anticipated movie is a huge letdown. Really out of context from the History Facts. I remember when I was in high school. We had a test subject about Napoleon Bonaparte and his conquest. I couldn’t fail it
@Sillytommysadventure11 ай бұрын
I dont understand what you wanted him to do here.
@christophermichaelclarence600311 ай бұрын
@@Sillytommysadventure In this particular scene he’s about to make a "Coup" which means he was planning to overthrow the Republic Constitution. According to History books, he made it but apparently not the case in this scene
@davidbarker465411 ай бұрын
Can i just say. As an English person. I am fully aware this film does miss a lot of campaigns napoleon had, battles.. important battles missed and other rather important details missed. This is an English made film. While it does miss a lot of key points, it is a fictional film. And it does a good job of being accurate.. mostly. Napoleon was a dictator. Yes. But i dont think anyone could dispute his cunning mind, he was also decent at war strategies. He propelled his country into a major power. Pissed of us English (and lets be honest thats war matters the most) and grabbed the attention of half the world. Love or hate him. The man has legendary accolades
@VivekSingh-rp9vw8 ай бұрын
I always thought "Napoleon was a Joker", but Now I KNOW "Napoleon is the JOKER" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@queeflandbrown4 ай бұрын
I implore anyone visiting clips of this trainwreck of a movie to take a gander at Epic History's series on the real story of Napoleon Bonaparte. About 2 months ago, they released a video of the Brumaire Coup and the downfall of the French Directory. The series as a whole is well written, well-illustrated/presented beautifully, and is much more captivating than Ridley Scott's "The Last Airbender."
@EdReddish1849 ай бұрын
I see Jocker cosplaying...😢
@retromojo110 ай бұрын
cant wait to get this on 4k bluray........... a masterpiece.....!!!!!
@greg6137711 ай бұрын
Say what you want about him, Napolean saved the ancient antigies of eqypt from being destoryed. the rosette stone was found because he wanted to perserve the history of egypt
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
By losing the best of the French Navy in a meaningless invasion what was the first of multiple military disasters for Napoleon, you forgot to mention that part. Because people like you want to ignore the disaster and try to attribute something positive, like a coward who can't face an ugly truth.
@imperatorsteve11 ай бұрын
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators Napoleon was a General and not an Admiral. The loss of the fleet at the battle of the Nile is a Navel loss and is the fault of the Admiral in charge, same as Trafalgar. The same as you can't blame the King or a us president for a loss if the commander on the ground or at sea is the one directing the battle.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
@@imperatorsteve Commenter forgot to mention the whole, DISASTER of a DEFEAT part, which is what Egypt was for Napoleon. Napoleon lost the best of the French navy in failed invasion, as Napoleon abandoned his army when things were going terrible, went back to France, pretended that he had conquered Egypt to the French public when Egypt was not subdued, and then manipulatively blamed Kleber for Napoleon's mess and ultimate French defeat in Egypt. Commenter forgot to mention that part, that Napoleon failed to control the area longterm and gave Napoleon enormous undue credit for saving ancient Egyptian history. Because we all know what a great legal scholar and building inspector that Napoleon was, as well as a great Ancient Egyptian Historian.
@imperatorsteve11 ай бұрын
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators you missed the bit that had the French navy been victorious then the French troops could count on resupply in a hostile region while the French pacified the locals. Without the fleet there was no chance of resupply or reinforcement. Yes it became a great propaganda point for Napoleon when he abandoned the dieing army, but it doesn't change the fact that had the fleet admiral done their job and won the battle of the Nile things could have turned out differently
@BasedStruggler11 ай бұрын
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictatorsImagine having such a SAD and BORING life you make an entire burner account to dickride a shitty director for a shitty movie. It's not about whether or not Napoleon was a good person or a good commander it's about HISTORICAL INACCURACIES.
@weezergreenalbum9 ай бұрын
I will say, the set design, outfits, and acting was really great in this movie.
@idontknow1643 ай бұрын
One of the tell-tale signs of Oscar Bait. But it was released in January. So...🤷♂️
@feelingsfeelings.28483 ай бұрын
Everything was great except for the script and the portrayal of Napoleon which ruins the entire movie
@SolomonKing-9954 ай бұрын
Damn ! Larys strong survived Dance of the Dragons !?
@martonvaszko3803 ай бұрын
So in the end Larys went to France but where is Aegon??? 😱😂
@JonNoto8 ай бұрын
It's a comedy. I picked up on that in the beginning, and I loved it. Excellent movie.
@mahaliadoesitbest229411 ай бұрын
History Buffs (KZbin channel) is going to tear Ridley Scott a new one 😂😂😂
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
You mean they should tear into the historians who taught you about Napoleon and his "conquests" and not his total defeat. They taught you wrong, because they did not teach you about all the massive disasters and all the wars that Napoleon lost as enemy troops marching down the streets of Paris, France under military occupation, a once juggernaut French military in shambles, a generation's worth of French boys lying in mass graves, France losing territory, France forced to pay massive war reparations, France forced to accept the hated Bourbon Monarchy, as Napoleon dies a broken defeated man on a forsaken island. Who should get torn a new one?
@mahaliadoesitbest229411 ай бұрын
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators still Ridley. He in fact told historians to "get a life"
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
@@mahaliadoesitbest2294 Just ignore the pathetic military results and call it a triumph, too cowardly to face an ugly truth.
@mahaliadoesitbest229411 ай бұрын
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators yeah....I'll send you the link when History Buffs uploads the recap. Ridley might retire afterwards lol
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
@@mahaliadoesitbest2294 The self denial is way too personal. I mean are you still grieving that your great great great great great French grandfather got hacked to pieces by Spanish guerrillas or something? Only to have France lose the Peninsular War, and the Napoleonic Wars overall as enemy troops march down the streets of Paris. Is that what you do not have the courage to yet admit, that so many French boys died horrible deaths in total defeat? So why don't you justify all the French death and suffering by telling yourself how Napoleon improved the Civil Code for the world, especially the reinstating slavery and the slave trade in his laws, that was certainly noble and enlightening.
@SassquatchTX2 ай бұрын
Imagine your general telling you they tried to kill me. While fighting back.
@benusmaximus360111 ай бұрын
This honestly wouldn't be out of place in a Monty Python sketch...
@Bill74782 ай бұрын
Everyone gangsta until the old guard comes🥶
@JohnGianiris-nc2xq11 ай бұрын
He is no Rod Steiger!
@LoudaroundLincoln11 ай бұрын
Few are.
@gtaipan74224 ай бұрын
You've missed the scene "shall we vote" quote.
@ExcitedAnacondaSnake-hg8ec11 ай бұрын
I think the movie kind of captures the spirit of the man and doesn’t look as bad as people say from the clips… I wouldn’t be surprised if it was bad.
@mykosumo947811 ай бұрын
i enjoyed the movie tbf
@n.s-studios11 ай бұрын
same@@mykosumo9478
@starexcelsior11 ай бұрын
The clips are fine, but the movie in its whole was just not good
@gizmothag50159 ай бұрын
Omfg I’m sorry but the way he tilted his head and sword when “threatening” to kill his brother was honestly hilarious 😂😂
@KHoltzie11 ай бұрын
I have to go see this movie-I want to look down and see Josephine’s surprise! 😏😏😏
@jebstuart40042 ай бұрын
An american or a british cannot understand the genius of Napoléon. He haunts them.....Forever.
@Kilesb10 ай бұрын
Now give the budget to a different director that's not American, and make it historically accurate with the same visuals.
@ronaldcerino38614 ай бұрын
I admire sir Bonaparte as a great leader and conqueror an emperor has not just sitting in it thrones but also fighting in battle field
@stickfiguratively64689 ай бұрын
I don't care what anyone says I love this movie and I will never ever hate this movie.
@MikhailMateo-sj1yi9 ай бұрын
Your lonely pal.
@FinCrow842 ай бұрын
That "Oh! F**K!!!" Destroyed me at 0:48 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@khanhang668311 ай бұрын
Reminded me of Caesar's assassination.
@chtey12343 ай бұрын
The old guard have the sapper bearskins not the spider logo on it but they fixed the plate but the old guard always uses the spider one which is mabye slightly taller
@catnaut903511 ай бұрын
Napoleon's brother is a G
@mushikamysh8407 ай бұрын
Такой эпизод действительно произошëл с Наполеоном Бонапартом в реальности. Ридли Скотт в данной сцене ПОЛЬСТИЛ Наполеону. Если герой Хоакина Феникса вырвался из толпы и не дал себя разорвать на куски, то настоящий Наполеон Бонапарт оказался в заложниках у совета пятисот и чуть было не погиб, еслиб не поддержка военных откликнувшишся на зов его брата.
@danilsmith729211 ай бұрын
Average high school student government be like
@jmWolfe25859 ай бұрын
Least corrupt student government:
@SethBarbrick11 ай бұрын
Something that nobody should do is joke about the French military, just because of one big defeat all of their major victories are forgotten
@darrenchavez4946 ай бұрын
1:20 "THERE TRYNA KILL ME!"
@markgolden48075 ай бұрын
They're Try To Kill Him
@schwunkie4 ай бұрын
By God, they're trying to kill him!!
@moniqueena227911 ай бұрын
There’s only one unnoticed inaccuracy in the movie, the shako of the Vieille Garde soldiers dont have a bearskin symbol but instead have a 1e Regiment sapper symbol on the top of their shakos. (The big plus symbol = sapper) 1:42 Do not let dudes from america do a napoleonic movie.
@dogedaytimedoge185410 ай бұрын
there’s more mistakes with this uniform if they are the old guard such as their bear skin plate not having the imperial eagle but they look more like some French grenadiers
@moniqueena22796 ай бұрын
@@dogedaytimedoge1854fr blawg
@ProbablySnippy4 ай бұрын
Nahhh, they meant to put over 200+ sappers with for some reason muskets in the movie! totally!
@speedracer100411 ай бұрын
"Shall we vote". 😉
@than0s9484 ай бұрын
"Oh, f*ck!" -Napoleon Bonaparte, 1799
@Colonel_Arthur5 ай бұрын
The soldiers are actual soldiers, they followed orders of their emperor till the very fucking end,mad respect to every single unit, every grenadier, and every Man who fought.
@strasseanthem859911 ай бұрын
Hate this movie with my heart
@josephloera153111 ай бұрын
Blud did most likey not even watch the movie anyways shut up
@JohnSmith-we1xg11 ай бұрын
Josephloera, it seems that you didnt watch this shit movie.
@archieburgess617311 ай бұрын
It was a great film,people just listen to what the media says without watching the film themselves
@JohnSmith-we1xg11 ай бұрын
Archiburges, this time the Media say the truth. It is a Shit movie. Nearly everything in this film was wrong. Even the Soundtrack was Shit. Ridley Scott didnt give a f... for a good Napoleon movie, He is laughing about positiv comments.
@crempies561011 ай бұрын
The way it was written an the timeline is utter garbage but it is still nice to look at cinema wise an the battle scenes.
@SunMoonBrothers11 ай бұрын
interesting how did napoleon with that that effiminate voice and manner manage to address his soldiers who were eager to die for him and rip all enemies apart
@daniyarmussin85902 ай бұрын
beautiful, Lord Larys protecting his brother
@ΓιωργοςΚαλογερόπουλος-π8υ11 ай бұрын
The fact that this movie is in Elglish language , is hilarious
@F1zzzy9011 ай бұрын
It wouldn't have gotten much international attention if it was filmed in French
@renevalice3056Ай бұрын
Pretty interesting that a royal man and Bonaparte himself plead to the soldiers to save them, having that need to convince troops to be on their side. Makes all the difference, armies do.
@BlizzPort11 ай бұрын
Garbage movie. Portrayed one of the greatest military generals as some incompetent turd who just achieved everything by luck. Total garbage.
@WHOCARESIFAFEWTREESAREDYING3 ай бұрын
I Imagine a man of napoleon ‘s stature wouldn’t have bodyguards
@evanhutchison845311 ай бұрын
I liked Napoleon, sure it was a little much with the sex and love interest and yes the battle scenes were at most subpar, but I think in the end it was a good movie if you see past all the inaccuracies, I mean I do enjoy a good movie and want them to be as historically accurate as possible. I view this as I view many movies, would I watch the entire thing from start to finish after seeing it in the movie theater? No, I wouldn't, but would I watch the scenes of battles on KZbin? Yes, I will.
@Daniel_P11611 ай бұрын
Great. Now we know the scope of Scott's achievement when it's the battle scenes that we care about.
@flicktick180010 ай бұрын
this just shows the tension between englishmen and frenchmen
@themaskedman2214 ай бұрын
Napoleon and the Bonapartes were Italian, a sore spot for many Frenchmen but nevertheless a fact.
@LoudaroundLincoln11 ай бұрын
How did we go from the Duellists to this? Scotts work on the Duellists gave me such high hopes for Napolean. Shame.
@adamszabo287411 ай бұрын
Ridley Scott is just old. Thats all
@suspicious2delicious11 ай бұрын
He got woke and old@@adamszabo2874
@Karl.Kreuzberg7 ай бұрын
My grandmother always told me, "I don't care what they tell you at school, Napoléon was a ridiculous emotive and power hungry manchild with the charisma of an oyster". I always knew my grandmother was right. Thank you grandma !
@multimediayredesdeluxe6 ай бұрын
Quien ese bichito rondando por allí?.
@TheCrusmon611 ай бұрын
Napoleon is an excellent movie. Ridley Scott did a great job!
@RyanWebster711 ай бұрын
Eat my ass
@townsley211 ай бұрын
it is indeed !
@theimmortalgrenadier385111 ай бұрын
Only 2 explanations: You're ironical or you're british
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators11 ай бұрын
@@theimmortalgrenadier3851 It has nothing to do with identity politics, not everyone is as biased as you are.
@theimmortalgrenadier385111 ай бұрын
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators Identity politics? Not enough IQ to get my comment. Brits have a huge rivalry against french so if he likes the film it's probably coz it portrayed Napoleon like some lunatic, incompetent, lucky and uncharismatic dwarf. Lol you probably went to watch Barbie and the New peter pan film and consider them to be the greatest films in the last dozen of years. Give me a break No mentally sane person with any common sense and historical knowledge enjoyed this mess of a pathetic film
@damedeviant13882 ай бұрын
That fall down the stairs looked painful!!
@nonye010 ай бұрын
im not french and even i feel offended by this movie.
@AlbertSerafini-pp8cw6 ай бұрын
Napoleon was born in the Island Of Corsica. His ancestry was Italian. Of Italian Nobility. His Parents were born on the Italian Mainland..
@NoahRodriquez6 ай бұрын
How are you offended this is the history of French
@AlbertSerafini-pp8cw6 ай бұрын
@@NoahRodriquez I am not offended. I am just stating Napoleon Bonaparte was Italian.
@themaskedman2214 ай бұрын
@@AlbertSerafini-pp8cw It's a sore spot for some to acknowledge the irony that the largest figure in French history was in fact Italian.
@multimediayredesdeluxe7 ай бұрын
0:43 Vaya!!! El 18 del ‘Brumario’ sí que “abrumó” al gran Napo. 😮 Pdt: Faltaba la música de Benny Hill 😂.