Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship, and a three-day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/KNGBonusWT Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.
@RedGreekWolf5 жыл бұрын
I liked playing War Thunder, but stopped a while ago. Them not having Australian servers at the time made me not want to play it.
@darklight83385 жыл бұрын
If possible can you do the Abyssinian-adal war or the ajuraan vs Portuguese naval battles across the east coast of Africa.
@hadtrio66295 жыл бұрын
hey how about ancient north Africa history
@ayoybdokali86005 жыл бұрын
المرجو الترجمة إلى العربية
@ditodanelia12155 жыл бұрын
thanks
@MrAlexkyra5 жыл бұрын
Calling your planned offensive 'Operation Home by Christmas' is like telling your partner that you're 2 days from retirement in a cop movie, or a soldier showing a photo of a loved one in a war movie.
@georgedoolittle75745 жыл бұрын
This is the correct military response as a: the Chinese attack came as a complete surprise and b: before withdrawing you need to know what's in front of you. Truman should have fired himself because of this and not MacArthur....which in a way did happen as Eisenhower took Command...yet again..
@MrAlexkyra5 жыл бұрын
@@georgedoolittle7574 I don't know, it seems like whenever you hear about a general saying 'the war will be over by christmas' it never is. And if Truman listened to McArthur we could have had a Third World War breaking out as the US used nuclear weapons against China and provoked a retaliation from the USSR.
@lolwutyoumad5 жыл бұрын
@@georgedoolittle7574 The Chinese attack only came as a surpirse as US generals thought that the reports of large numbers of troops massing at the border was bogus. Its hard to hide movements of a million man army
@enixbluerain72135 жыл бұрын
These are signs of bad luck.
@LOL-zu1zr5 жыл бұрын
lolwutyoumad apparently all you needed was to place grass on your head, planes don’t have thermal sight at the time.
@ICHBinCOOLERalsJeman5 жыл бұрын
"home by christmas" where have I heard this one before
@gorkemgorduk44805 жыл бұрын
Operation Market Garden
@suryaprakash21265 жыл бұрын
Operation Barbarossa
@winterwar55835 жыл бұрын
ICHBinCOOLERalsJemand ww1
@snesko975 жыл бұрын
Basically Allied motto of the wars
@arthurlombard51815 жыл бұрын
Basically from every major war 1914 onwards
@lister17455 жыл бұрын
Stalin screwed china over with the Korean War. He promised heavy aid from air support to providing supplies for China for intervention in the war, but actually provided little. The Chinese troops fight well when they are under supplied, with little to no firepower and under enemy air superiority.
@barbiquearea5 жыл бұрын
He also screwed China over even before that when he refused to back the Communists under Mao during the Chinese Civil War even though the US had poured tons of weapons and aid to the Nationalist side.
@wanxinmike5 жыл бұрын
He also tried to screw China by keeping the Liaodong Peninsula as a permanent Red Navy base for the USSR. The Korean War showed the Soviets that China didn't fuck around and therefore the Soviets handed control of the port back to China.
@hyltoniali2575 жыл бұрын
kabigon The port’s name is LvShun, known as Port Arthur to the West
@wanxinmike5 жыл бұрын
@@hyltoniali257 yes thanks, I had forgotten!
@dongomajor5 жыл бұрын
There's a major reason the Soviets didn't do more in Korea- they also could've used their veto power on the UN security council to keep the UN from sending troops at all. They were sheepish during the Korean War because, as a new nuclear power with an underdeveloped nuclear arsenal, the US could've easily sold the idea of a retaliatory nuclear strong on the USSR to their allies. The US was even threatening non-nuclear China with nuclear weapons. The Soviets weren't prepared to risk likely total atomic annihilation.
@zhizuc.75164 жыл бұрын
USA: Home by Christmas China: What is Christmas?
@vicvega44153 жыл бұрын
Mccarther said that not USA
@HOTPLATEGAMING3 жыл бұрын
China: COVID-19
@1008581013 жыл бұрын
fort detrick
@diaosibuku3 жыл бұрын
@@HOTPLATEGAMING no COVID in China now, happy
@unudo33593 жыл бұрын
@@HOTPLATEGAMING Your name means "idiot" in Chinese pronunciation. I think you are very accurate in your position.
@mexicoball25295 жыл бұрын
McArthur: Names his operation Home by Christmas History: Bad move buddy
@leexingha5 жыл бұрын
McArthur wanted to nuke China so he can regain his honor
@charizard25.5 жыл бұрын
Couldn't get the joke. Can you explain?
@seanbruce82945 жыл бұрын
İbrahim Uzunoğlu The Chinese intervened and the war lasted for a few more years.
@giadinhhang59885 жыл бұрын
@@charizard25. I believe it refers to what the Kaiser of the German empire said to his army at the start of WW1"You will be home by Christmas"
@WilliamTanaka5 жыл бұрын
War will be over by Christmas is a thing that everyone says but never happen. Like in world war 1 and 2 for example.
@tsekwongtai90054 жыл бұрын
Korean War, China : "Don't cross 38th parallel!", US : "No way, shit!" Vietnam War, China : "Don't cross 17th parallel!", US : "Yes Sir!"
@sixtails-3 жыл бұрын
leetangfai sdlan that’s the only reason why Vietcong didn’t get wiped out
@dowrhew55813 жыл бұрын
@@divifilius4957 thats true
@taiwan66913 жыл бұрын
😂
@genova44853 жыл бұрын
@@divifilius4957 USA won every major battle in vietnam ? Haha obviously u did not understand the meaning of guilera warfare lmao
@shuangbiaogou4373 жыл бұрын
@@divifilius4957 and US is not tired of war in middle east?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I like the way u defend US.
@Gigas01015 жыл бұрын
"Home by Christmas" offensive... It's like MacArthur knew he had screwed up.
@ninjaturtlemaster245 жыл бұрын
Macarthur: Home by christmas Mao: Chopped up by Christmas.
@waterfall11003 жыл бұрын
First of all, I can probably say that the Chinese did not want to get involved in this bloody conflict. China was in the middle of reconstruction after the Second World War and it would be fairly wasteful to invest in a conflict against the United States. However, consider the situation that China was in. The United States was just mere miles from the Chinese border. General MacArthur was a fairly trigger-happy general, and he made it clear that he would not mind to use the Korean War was a pretext to attack China. Even if the attack did not immediately arrive, having the American military so close to china’s industrial north and its capital city certainly does leave the Chinese extremely vulnerable to potential future attacks. Furthermore, having the Americans so close to China also made it much easier for them to perform various sabotage operations against the Chinese, further destabilizing the nation. In addition, although China did have a defence treaty with the Soviets, Stalin (and the USSR in general) was not a party that China could actually rely upon. This was proven during the actual conflict, as the USSR did not provide China with the air support it needed to counter-attack the Americans, causing China to suffer high casualties in the conflict. This sentiment was confirmed just a few years later during the Sino-Soviet split. So, given that China had unreliable (and potentially hostile) “allies” and was facing a UN force led by a very offensively-minded American general, we can assume that China joined this war mainly for its self-preservation. I hope what I said made sense. But… I would like to add that China’s biggest mistake for attempting to invade South Korea. The initial intervention in North Korea was a just defensive action and was immensely successful. With relative surplus in munitions, the Chinese were able to use blizkreig tactics to achieve the following: 1) The farthest military retreat EVER suffered by the Americans, a record that holds till this day. 2) Nearly 1:1 combat loss ratio relative to the Americans All this forced the American to attempt a ceasefire mere months after the Chinese offensive. Had the Chinese taken the ceasefire, that would have marked the end of their just defensive action. Sadly, Mao was overconfident and decided to pursue the offensive further. Pushing into the South Korea, the Chinese eventually basically ran out of food and munitions. Logistics on the Chinese were poor, so resupply was virtually non existent. It was under this context that China suffered higher casualties than the Americans during the subsequent UN counteroffensives. So rejecting the ceasefire proposal was China’s worst mistake here….. booo
@文杰张-m1y3 жыл бұрын
You're right.
@notatrollll3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, that led to more massive loss of lives to Chinese, Americans, AND Koreans that all could have also been avoided. I understand the logic, but some consideration should be put into the use of your mens lives. The US should have stopped at the barrier and fortified South Korea and called it a day. china shouldnt have intervented. Much blame to go around, meanwhile as usual the civilians and foot soldiers on all sides suffer. Not to mention, now we have North Korea as a dictatorship almost nobody cares for. my hope is China finally comes down on North Korea and forces them to behave as Korean/US intervention is something China doesn’t want either. They are your baby, deal with them
@dznuts1233 жыл бұрын
@@notatrollll not China. It was the us who shouldn’t have intervened. Need me to remind you who intervened first? It was the us.
@robfl1003 жыл бұрын
I don't think Macarthur was as trigger happy as he's often made out to be. The Americans didn't want a war with North Korea (or China) in the first place, in fact they deliberately kept the South Korean army under-supplied in order to restrain them from provoking a war with the North. Despite being unprepared for a full scale war, the US and South Koreans were able to drive the North Koreans back across the border after 2 months of heavy fighting, and extensive use of air power. Despite the KPA being devastated, they were still in a position to launch guerilla attacks, so Macarthur gave them an ultimatum to surrender before invading North Korea. Even after they refused, he still gave them a final opportunity to accept defeat, before launching the invasion.
@zidorovichburblyatya28623 жыл бұрын
@@robfl100 McArthur was a trigger-happy general because he wanted to nuke China while Eisenhower and Bradley don't want that to happen because even Soviets have no nukes yet at that time, both have massive numbers that would make deployment of nukes impossible to determine because communists fight harder when many of them die. A Vietcong from a documentary (Face of the Enemy) proved that.
@affandi995 жыл бұрын
USA, South Korea, and their allies: Korean War seems over for all of us. North Korea: Looks like I'm gon- China: *Allow me to introduce myself*
@affandi995 жыл бұрын
China: Owh, I thought you still busy with Japan about Sakhalin...
@affandi995 жыл бұрын
@@mukhtarsyajaratun1025 nah I'm Indonesian
@masayukitachibana27565 жыл бұрын
China : "Allow us to introduce *our*selves (ussr anthem intensifies)
@affandi995 жыл бұрын
@@mukhtarsyajaratun1025 From Java. Maybe less asking learn more from the video instead
@affandi995 жыл бұрын
@@masayukitachibana2756 *Human Wave Intensifies*
@denniscleary75805 жыл бұрын
The Korean War gets shadowed by the Vietnam war so much, it’s nice to see more information on it👍
@stormrunner40815 жыл бұрын
It’s called the forgotten war
@christosvoskresye5 жыл бұрын
Which is ironic, since Korea remains a powder keg. Vietnam is now irrelevant, except in one vital aspect: the reaction to the reaction to the Vietnam War has made American militarism something like a state religion.
@beurteilung7135 жыл бұрын
Its because smug European fucks can't hold the Korean war against us. Objectively in Vietnam, US Forces killed 1.1 million Viet Cong and NVA troops, and wiped out nearly 85% of the NVA Officer corps. When bombings on Hanoi increased, they were already preparing to hold peace talks in Paris, but they held out just a bit longer and got lucky when US forces withdrew. But the Europeans won't listen to this, nor will they listen to the fact that one of their own started the war and had us dragged into it. They hear "US Withdraw" and think HAHAHA AMERICA BAD YOU LOSE!!!111!!
@zeflute45865 жыл бұрын
The forgotten war it was
@kaptinshazbat75355 жыл бұрын
@@beurteilung713 US forces killed 1.1 million Vietnamese people. That's why they lost. Every dead civilian spawns a soldier.
@tadoshka51705 жыл бұрын
Everybody is a Gangsta until the Chinese cross the Yalu river
@chris_22085 жыл бұрын
They were temporarily stopped by a a small number of Filipino soldiers.
@gregorjerman9735 жыл бұрын
@joek it was a Major Retreat they stand their ground and so there's no point in fighting a Doomed position for long they all went crazy just to get to the original 38th Parallel division.
@chucklotro87495 жыл бұрын
@@chris_2208 but they were held by the 31st Infantry Regimental Combat Team (also known as "Task Force Faith" or "Task Force Maclean"), which protected his right flank and took the brunt of a reinforced CCF corps for five days was not included in Smith's recommendation for the Presidential Unit Citation after the battle. Thirty years later, the CCF commanders, Gen Song and Gen Peng, attributed the 31st RCT with breaking their offensive and preventing them from achieving their objectives.
@themostextrordenaryconvolu34065 жыл бұрын
The frozen chosen also held them of for almost a whole month.
@X.Y.Z.075 жыл бұрын
@@aaronlimeuchin7352 I dont think Indonesia is part of the UN intervention group during the Korean war...
@aliciap63293 жыл бұрын
So it was 300k Chinese army vs 700k UN army with better equipment of course.
@jamesbalbutin67963 жыл бұрын
Guys I found out in Google That 2.3million Chinese personel participated in Korean war.
@刘岩-b9n3 жыл бұрын
There is a misconception that China won by huge crowd strategy. actrully there are more soldiers in UN
@user-vv7ir1pl4j2 жыл бұрын
@Snazzio it was 300k and it stayed that way. All of the battles didn't require more men. It's just western media suggesting 1 American gunned down 1000 chinese
@user-vv7ir1pl4j2 жыл бұрын
@james balbutin that source is wrong. Within Korea it was around 300k. 1.2mil if u push it with a bais. The figure u gave us probably includes logistics medical with the troops rotating in and out of the country
@shiyian9 ай бұрын
rotating you dont use the same 300k troops unless you want them to be completely destoryed mentally@@jamesbalbutin6796
@GiGi-wg9lq5 жыл бұрын
Underestimating it's opponents and overestimating itself, pretty much sums up every military campaign of the US since WWII. Let's also not forget that this is China at one of it's weakest points in it's 4,000+ year history.
@barbiquearea5 жыл бұрын
To be fair the Chinese had just recently concluded their own civil war. While the country was in ruins and the Chinese military lacked the same resources, weapons or firepower campared to the US and their allies, they did have some of the most battle hardened soldiers at the time. And I mean veterans who had fought the Japanese for eight years and then each other for four years after that.
@AK-di7ws5 жыл бұрын
yep... .if the Chinese can repel the American and UN forces with just simply numbers and basic weaponry (which is less advanced than their opponents) and with no air and sea support. just imagine what kind of damage they can do today.... they have everything the Americans have and 4 times the numbers
@cefb89235 жыл бұрын
@@AK-di7ws Except they dont have everything we have, they have less and shittier copies of the stuff they know we have.
@AK-di7ws5 жыл бұрын
@@cefb8923 that's what most people think. but even if they don't have the best weapon as the American.... they are still very capable. Just imagine taking this Korean war as an example. the UN underestimate the Chinese totally (base on their weapon at that time is so outdated as compared to the US. they can still fight with the US & UN to a stalemate. whereas the UN and American have all the weapons at their disposal. the Chinese at that time doesn't have any fighter jets, aircraft carriers, nukes, or any of the luxuries as the Americans. but today they have everything the Americans have. Maybe for some not better but still very capable. Today China is not yesterday's China.
@isaacsorrels40775 жыл бұрын
@@AK-di7ws Comparing the Chinese soldiers in the Korean war to Chinese soldiers today would be a massive mistake. China today does not have battle hardened veterans that cut their teeth serving against a superior foe for 8+ years. Dont get it twisted; the technology of today makes Chinas numbers pretty meaningless in everything but a land war, and a defensive land war at that. Seeing as how the general American populace is probably better armed than the PLA it doesnt matter how many people China can throw at a problem; the days of human wave tactics are over and the only thing numbers do is increase the number of dead. The quality of your armaments, and the skilled manpower pool to operate said armaments, is way more important. USA beats everyone in that, not just China.
@taoliu73125 жыл бұрын
1950 United States:GDP $ 270 billion China: GDP $ 10 billion United States: Army, Navy, Air Force China: Army United States: F86 M26 M3 M19 M41-155 M1-Garand ..... China: M1917 Type38 Grenade American soldiers: sleeping bags, cans, hot coffee, body armor, helicopter transport Chinese Soldier: Southern Cotton Coat + Fried flour + Snow
@SADBOY-di3th5 жыл бұрын
志愿军伟大
@zaidhashmi60234 жыл бұрын
@but2star underrated comment
@tqri97954 жыл бұрын
Statistics talks.
@萧萧-c8q4 жыл бұрын
@but2star The U.S. army occupied Afghanistan, but fell into a security war. It's not the same.
@wangharry20714 жыл бұрын
毛主席万岁
@CrimsonDragon155 жыл бұрын
China used armies of infantry to push back armies that grossly surpassed them in terms of tanks, aircraft and artillery. Truly an impressive feat.
@GodsChosen695 жыл бұрын
not really, they attacked unprepared troops like pussies and got fucking rekt by the end of the war. losing a shitton of their people and gaining nothing.
@jonsong45925 жыл бұрын
@@GodsChosen69 "attacking unprepared troops like pussies" you mean using strategy?......Should they have gotten together on the battlefield with a 3 day notice and say 'ready set go' before attacking next time?
@tea12555 жыл бұрын
Alfonso Castro Hold on....aren’t you suppose to stay alert under such circumstances (war)?
@yourenodaisy23915 жыл бұрын
US military are "Unprepared troops ". No, the actual terms is paper armies, look and sound really powerful on paper but the reality is ship get sunk, planes get shot down and soldiers get blown up. The Korean war and the Vietnam war, remember.
@NekoLilium20125 жыл бұрын
Well, ROK army is a weak point in their defense line, PVA always choose to break through the defense line that ROK solders are holding.
@jason89235 жыл бұрын
MacArthur: I'll be home by Christmas! China: I'm about to end this man's whole career
@samstock35314 жыл бұрын
JeffT Rev Accurate!
@williamxie96804 жыл бұрын
Jason China: Hold my Spring Festival
@jason89234 жыл бұрын
@@williamxie9680 lmao
@jason89234 жыл бұрын
Side note his career did end there... When he advocated for nuclear strike on China and Truman got sick of him
@文光-z5z4 жыл бұрын
He ended his own career by disobeying the president!
@SandRhomanHistory5 жыл бұрын
a topic covered too rarely on KZbin.
@chucklotro87495 жыл бұрын
You don't want to anger winnie the pooh....
@mac28575 жыл бұрын
Because Americans got their butt kicked
@Mikko0885 жыл бұрын
@Christian Kenny I would take a look at North Korea still rubbing it in your faces even to this day, if I were you.
@yunchengyang9465 жыл бұрын
@Christian Kenny I would take a look at who achieves its military goals if I were you. If you looked at casualties, americans should have won Vietnam as well
@Mikko0885 жыл бұрын
@Christian Kenny Your inability to take it out. That's what.
@halulee81485 жыл бұрын
I am a doctor in China. I have a patient who is 90 years old. He came to treat his knee pain.He wore a long military uniform and had many wartime Distinguished Conduct Medals on it. He told me he had a gunshot wound in his right focile. He often dreamt that he was still in the cave and hearing the bomb of American planes outside.He joined the red army during the long march in 18 years old and survived all these years.Then he was sent to Korea and became part of Volunteer Army. Wish for China and the US can work to ensure peaceful and stable world.
@geromegeronimo83124 жыл бұрын
yes, hopefully we have peace and china would not be a power hungry imperialistic like america.
@zhoujiegu39154 жыл бұрын
Spicy Soda China will never be like US. If you know more about China culture, you will realize China loves peace. China only intends to govern itself well and takeover it belongs. Never invade other countries or cause rigional tension
@TheBobbyolsen4 жыл бұрын
Zhoujie Gu China is invading countries right now tho
@zhoujiegu39154 жыл бұрын
Xander Zeno invading which country? Tell me
@jerkllhyde77564 жыл бұрын
Zhoujie Gu probably China itself i guess. Some people never use their brain when they type.
@day21485 жыл бұрын
"For over a hundred years, foreign powers had viewed Chinese armies with contempt, believing they had neither the leadership, nor the expertise, nor the will to fight a modern war. No longer." - Professor Richard Baum, UCLA, describing the impact of the Korean War in [The Fall and Rise of China].
@beurteilung7135 жыл бұрын
The Korean War confirmed the view of foreign powers if anything. The Chinese ruthlessly threw wave after wave at UN forces to try and dislodge them from their positions. They had the complete upper hand and still could not pass the 38th parallel, and pathetically lost an incredible amount of manpower during the UN withdraw to the 38th parallel, something only a primitive army with horrible leadership could even have happen to them.
@day21485 жыл бұрын
@@beurteilung713 says the person who doesn't know a thing about military tactics lol. How about do some actual reading on the "Three-Three System" light infantry tactics the Chinese used which left historians impressed to this day? www.quora.com/How-were-the-Chinese-able-to-push-back-a-highly-mechanized-adversary-with-human-wave-tactics-in-the-Korean-War/answer/Rpz-Liu-2?ch=10&share=ab6df63d&srid=mZA5
@LOL-zu1zr5 жыл бұрын
Omnes una manet nox Documentary:300,000 Chinese VS 713,000 UN troops. Some retard: chInEse USe hOOMUn waVes
@JYTheAviator5 жыл бұрын
@@LOL-zu1zr shots fired like literally.
@LOL-zu1zr5 жыл бұрын
Aizaz Aziz Soviet immigrants in the west hold deep hatred of all communist countries
@zetajolyne36893 жыл бұрын
Interesting fact: After the Korean War, the US military began to attach great importance to special operations and night operations, and the PLA began to attach great importance to mechanization and heavy fire support. Up to now, the US military has the world's most expensive night vision device, and PLA, even the COOKING SQUAD carry a throwaway anti-tank rocket launcher for each one.
@lokok76433 жыл бұрын
lol
@user-gongaesa2 жыл бұрын
🇨🇳👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉🗑
@汝爱花否2 жыл бұрын
lol
@xinlvmetalproducts1442 жыл бұрын
lol,,,, That's right. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@shiyian9 ай бұрын
"let bro cook"
@byc62305 жыл бұрын
Didn't know China was ferociously fighting against the whole UN before, this war is way underreported, maybe because it doesn’t look so good for the UN force. Anyway keep up the good work and really enjoyed the information, glad to know more about this war!
@ousamadearudesuwa5 жыл бұрын
it is reported here in Asia due to it being a war where strategies are done correctly.
@Alexander-fl7ii5 жыл бұрын
Lol, these replies are ridiculous. It wasn’t fight the “whole UN” it was fighting a fraction of a fraction of the military capabilities the UN could muster. The west had just finished WW2 (during which the USA saved China from japan while the communists ran away like scared children) and it didn’t want another full scale deployment to Korea.
@leonardwei39145 жыл бұрын
@Zayed Haroon China got "whooped" pretty badly by the end when they over extended their supply lines and sacrificed the well being of their troops for rapid offenses into the south. It got so bad, that PLV generals Zhou Enlai and Peng Dehuai got in a shouting argument with government representatives over the lack of supplies and equipment promised to the troops. Casualties of PLV soldiers also increased dramatically when faced hardened U.S., ROK, and UN resistance to the point China's aim to push UN forces out of Korea was settled to mere "stalemate" with North Korea remaining a buffer.
@primuszorn29075 жыл бұрын
@@leonardwei3914 A rookie (China) fought Mike Tyson (USA) to a stalemate under limited guidance from Muhammad Ali (USSR). For the rookie, it is certainly something to be proud of.
@1990nhanphan5 жыл бұрын
@Zayed Haroon First, learn some proper English, which starts with spelling and punctuation. Second, using your logic, then China got whooped by a tiny island called Japan during WW2, did they not?
@janusjones65195 жыл бұрын
The Korean intervention meant that the US never dared to cross the 17th parallel in Vietnam, which practically sealed the outcome of that war.
@xz18915 жыл бұрын
That's a demand by Mao and Zhou, USA army abide
@royzhang88854 жыл бұрын
Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, North Korea, Vietnam. Some country always invades.
@garethxue89384 жыл бұрын
That's true, and no back home by Xmas any more
@That_GuyYouTube3 жыл бұрын
@@royzhang8885 Panama, Dominican Republic, and many Latin American countries USA were successful in, but failed badly when it came to Middle East, Balkans, and Asia.
@janusjones65193 жыл бұрын
@@That_GuyKZbin successful in installing pro-US dictators
@Jake-dh9qk5 жыл бұрын
I'm impressed how the Chinese can cross the yalu River and move across a thick earthly layer of forest at the same coordinated time
@twocents8564 жыл бұрын
lol
@在下-n1g4 жыл бұрын
意志
@sangpan60564 жыл бұрын
@John C actually they are the nightmare of US soldiers,US babes just crying in the night even cannot hold the weapon,XD
@garrycoleman85374 жыл бұрын
@John C Chinese also have now plus hyposonic missiles!!!!!!
@janjiavicii13283 жыл бұрын
彭德怀的伟大战略指挥能力
@杨铁-g1n2 жыл бұрын
I have many stories to tell. My grandfather served in the Ninth Corps of the Chinese People's Volunteers and participated in the second battle. In the battle outside the 三所里, his company survived only four soldiers who could fight, but they were still quickly incorporated into other teams and groups. After hearing the sound of the bugle, they charged the defense line consisting of three tanks, semi permanent concrete fortifications and machine gun fire points, and their weapons were only Soviet assisted ppsh41, Moxinagan rifles and Sanpaci shiki hohei ju. The soldiers of the two battalions participated in the offensive mission, The heavy firepower and support firepower they could get sounded like a joke: there were only two SG43 heavy machine guns and a Japanese 75mm cannon (this was far more than the average luxury configuration). During the second campaign of the Korean War, the temperature on the North Korean Plateau reached minus 45 degrees Celsius, which was the coldest winter in Korea for half a century, A large number of soldiers from southern China are seriously short of warm clothing (More than one third of the front-line soldiers of the regiment still wear autumn uniforms, and the winter cotton padded clothes are far from being able to cope with the same cold temperature as the Moscow campaign of World War II. The food is only the powder made of beans and rice. One fifth of the soldiers suffer from night blindness to varying degrees. Even 125 soldiers of an entire company are frozen to death in the ambush position. When the scout who delivered the order arrives, he finds that they are still frozen to death Holding a crawling posture for battle), the non combat casualties of the Ninth Corps were four times that of the casualties in this battle. The morale and fighting spirit of the CPC army were frightening, but the backward logistics was a disaster. Soldiers once created a miracle of walking, completed 72 kilometers of mountain march in 14 hours, and carried out tactical interposition against the enemy, However, the backward equipment and logistics make it impossible for them to expand and consolidate their combat achievements. Their terrible experience is far beyond my imagination. May the war never happen again.
@mrskoous9159 Жыл бұрын
向英雄致敬
@USER-wp6ds Жыл бұрын
@@mrskoous9159 Did you say "I hate xi jinping and chinese communist party, I want revival of Qing Dynasty!" That's interesting I agree about your opinion, peace👍
@yingjianwang3045 Жыл бұрын
人民英雄永垂不朽
@3rd.Eye.Saw.Destruction Жыл бұрын
@@USER-wp6ds bro had to go full anglo racism mode just because chinese people finally have freedom lol. even kmt people don't agree with you because they also didn't want to be ruled by the qing dynasty.
@bababab8092 Жыл бұрын
@@USER-wp6ds I'm sad that your a$$ still hurting after 60+ years of war. you need some vaseline bro.
@judgingmorty73715 жыл бұрын
its the people who wrote "The Art of War" after all
@ZhangtheGreat5 жыл бұрын
Here's something few remember: while Soviet air support was limited, Stalin did make due on his promise to provide some air support for China's intervention. When the UN forces shot down some "Chinese" planes, they noticed that the pilots inside were Soviets. It's likely that these Soviet pilots were training the Chinese on how to fly such planes. At home though, the US never revealed such information until long after the Korean War ended, as such a revelation would've resulted in outcries for war against the USSR, and both the US and USSR understood that such a war was the last thing anyone needed.
@andro78625 жыл бұрын
@@rsr7014 But in the heat of battle they would curse in Russian. They blew their cover because of saying "сука блят"。
@shawnhughes41925 жыл бұрын
True, but the same Pharos that ran the world back in Egypt are still running the world now (DNA / Tracking first born males aka Y chromosomes) the descendants of the Pharos do and will always run the world. So US and USSR would have never went to war because that would be game over. The game being 'human control and domination'
@andro78625 жыл бұрын
@@shawnhughes4192 I think you watched too much Yu Gi Oh.
@ecpgieicg4 жыл бұрын
This confuses timeline of events. During the time of this video, no Soviet air support.
@dariomendoza1913 жыл бұрын
wow pretty cool to know that!!
@kampfer915 жыл бұрын
If anything we should learn , is that never underestimate China military .
@崔莱5 жыл бұрын
Too bad many war hawks in the US don't learn that lesson.
@irritatedanglosaxon17055 жыл бұрын
Also Chinese people and communist party
@bullmeatt5 жыл бұрын
they were armed with surplus WW2 weaponry and easily over ran tanks, artillery and experienced US troops. They are always underestimated and now they have caught up with modern war technology.
@Mike-bt3ki5 жыл бұрын
@RogerwilcoFoxtrot LOL the Chinese told everyone they were going to retaliate and enter the Korean War if the US and US allies continue pushing to the Chinese border. Fuck America
@jellyfever62385 жыл бұрын
@@김우성-h8u What does this war have to do with South Korea? Oh, on their land, that's all
@yfangyusnpan55363 жыл бұрын
I come from south China where it never snows, my grandfather took part in the Korean War, he said it was the first time to see snow, it was too cold, there were not enough clothes, many comrades froze to death. It was a very bitter war.
@user-gongaesa2 жыл бұрын
🇨🇳👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉🗑
@周烈昊2 жыл бұрын
@@user-gongaesa 我爷爷说过,十七国战俘里韩国人是炮的最快的👌🤣
@dan86362 жыл бұрын
@@user-gongaesa 🇰🇷 : proud to be US’ good doggie 🐶
@user-gongaesa2 жыл бұрын
@@dan8636 🇨🇳👉👉👉👉👉🚽🚽🗑
@chiangchengkooi97912 жыл бұрын
Respect to your grandfather and his comrade.
@cdcdrr5 жыл бұрын
"Home by Christmas Offensive" This erases all claims to brilliance McArthur ever made.
@doaftheloaf4 жыл бұрын
macarthur is the one person most responsible for the fact that the current NK regime exists today. his antagonism of china was as stupid as hitler declaring war on america, and for the same reason. he's the trump of the 50s.
@汤圆-y7f3 жыл бұрын
I don't blame him, he thought he could kill 10 Chinese with his left hand tied behind his back. Trump was also thinking about the same, "trade war is easy to win", remember? People who think they could hurt China without getting themselves seriously hurt are as smart as a rock.
@circleancopan77483 жыл бұрын
Except the 10th BCT, which earned his title, Fighting Filipinos, held the record of the only position not overrun by PVA.
@mab77275 жыл бұрын
And remember, these chinese forces lacked artillery, tanks and airwing yet they steamrolled them ...
@desphunter5 жыл бұрын
ken ho blade teams were in sino-japanese war. There should be a basis capability there, otherwise this would be a myth rather than a war.
@poluye50994 жыл бұрын
Without ammunition. cold weapons will come on the scene. However the Korean War
@samuelademeso90414 жыл бұрын
Well they did have some support from the Soviet in terms of equipment, and also the Soviet airforce defended their airspace alongside north Korea against un planes
@Mike-bt3ki4 жыл бұрын
Americans are weak Lmao they bully small nations but can't take on big nations
@fungames244 жыл бұрын
They surprised the americans with gongs. Next time, they won't be so lucky because the americans are now fully trained to defeat gongs.
@ofi12385 жыл бұрын
Wait, 370k vs 723k and the latter had superior weaponry. What is it that I am missing here?
@cpmenninga5 жыл бұрын
Just like the UN, you are missing military leadership at the top.
@ofi12385 жыл бұрын
@@cpmenninga You lost me there. I thought on average the casualty rate of the UN army is much lower than the Chinese like @5:16.Unless you meant somehow the UN had non-military leadership personnel in numbers that can rival the whole Chinese army personnel.
@w8ingsim435 жыл бұрын
The mind of USA soldier and generals are weak and slow.
@w8ingsim435 жыл бұрын
@Ahmad Zubair Chinese goal was push USA away from China's door step,not to help North Korean, China don't give a shit about the fat Kim
@w8ingsim435 жыл бұрын
@Ahmad Zubair And those death numbers only proves my point further.
@shuangbiaogou4374 жыл бұрын
when the fight ceased, Chinese soldiers with drawn, and the US soldiers settled down in South Korea permenently. Same to Japan, Germany, Iraq and so on. History repeats again and again. Ppl are just blind.
@shuangbiaogou4373 жыл бұрын
@@무명-n6i No, China and Korea wont be good friend as long as the US military as CIA agencies still present in Korea. China has no problem with Korea. Only problem is with US. The same situation with Japan. The US does not want to see an united east Asia. It tries so hard to play off one country against each others. Take Japan, those politician who r promoting peace and unification of east Asia had either committed suicide or been put into jail for corruption. If China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hongkong, Singapore, Vietnam, Mongolia, North Korea all united to form a single market economy which allows goods, people, capital and resources to flow freely like EU. It is going to be end of US hegemony.
@rec92643 жыл бұрын
@@shuangbiaogou437 Absolutely true. Divide and conquer, ongoing in East Asia and Middle East. Western world-conquest. But someone fears that single market concept like EU wouldn't work well in East Asia because simply China is too big, but I completely agree with the idea of Pan-Asianism.
@shuangbiaogou4373 жыл бұрын
@@rec9264 It is not really big problem. Having conflict of interests is very normal. Even within China, different provinces compete for resources. In EU, small nations also talk shit about Germany and France. But when it comes to the foreign policy, they united. And we need a united entity for east asia.
@rec92643 жыл бұрын
@@shuangbiaogou437 France and Germany are not even nearly big as China it is non equivalence. The US is part of Western world but EU will not allow US joining them and if it happens US absolutely fleece the market and Western Europe will become even more subordinated to the US than now. In East Asia, things are not that simple, maybe you knew that in the first place. But anyway we need to cast off the western intervention and their delusional 'Soft Power' horseshits for sure.
@derinusmischeelss33443 жыл бұрын
Here's your 50 cent
@forgeviewyt15685 жыл бұрын
UN: We are a nation of nations,nobody can defeat us,Together we are Strong China: Hold my Beer
@mr.tobacco17085 жыл бұрын
China: We gonna encircle the entire UN Army and liberate Korean Workers. Turkish Brigade: We are about to bayonet those commies career.
@mr.tobacco17085 жыл бұрын
@@EroticOnion23 AHAHAHAHAHAHAH Looks like i've got some racist fella here huh. Alright boy, let me tell you what was the Turkish Brigade which my Grandfather was part of in Korea. Turkish Brigade was the unit who stopped rapidly advancing Chinese Army in Kunu-Ri or widely known Battle of Wavon. They were encircled, they were VERY outnumbered and outgunned, they refused to surrender and fight until their last bullets against the Chinese, hold their advance there and allowed UN Army to withdraw before get encircled by advancing Chinese. When their ammo ran out they charged with bayonets and break the encirclement. Which after this battle Turkish Soldiers became very famous in UN forces, specially widely known with their brutal tactics against the Chinese and Koreans. THEN Kumyangjang-Ni where again Turkish Soldiers took a highly protected and reinforced hill from Chinese after an failed British and Australian charge. Turks took the hill and when they saw Chinese soldiers was running to another hill they attacked with Bayonets again and took two more hills, opening a large hole in Chinese defense line give a UN army chance to push PLA back to 38th Parellel. If you don't believe me you racist ignorant oxygen waste, you can take a look at these: www.historynet.com/korean-war-1st-turkish-brigades-baptism-of-fire.htm www.belgian-volunteercorps-korea.be/english/UNO%20landen/Turkey.htm kzbin.info/www/bejne/fIerd4SLep6EibM
@hwasiaqhan89235 жыл бұрын
Mr.Tobacco Yes Turks did well, but you do realise that it’s extremely difficult to attack an fortified position without artillery, air and armoured support in modern warfare right? The Chinese were a more powerful force in the war in terms of overall performance. The Chinese fend off countless UN assaults that were supported by artillery, tanks and aircrafts, that’s something to brag about.
@mr.tobacco17085 жыл бұрын
@Gardabor denterfield Bruh, Turks would have just give up and surrender to the Chinese (Like most of the ROK and U.S soldiers did in war) and allow entire UN forces to encircled. They hold their ground delayed the enemy as much they can while Americans were on full retreat. Yeah they lost the battle but literally allowed UN to keep the fight going. Also when your wastly outnumbered your ''superior'' weapons like M1 Garand and Thompsons doesn't matter. Also China was poor but Chinese Armies who entered Korea was well equipped thanks to Soviets.
@mr.tobacco17085 жыл бұрын
@@hwasiaqhan8923 Yeah that was one of the things made Turks in UN forces famous and kinda 'feared' by the other soldiers. Because when other units mostly start withdrawing soon as their ammo ran out. Turks were holding their grounds and continue with their bayonets. That is why one of the U.S officer says ''Turks are bad at retreating but damn good at defending their positions''
@patrickweber87505 жыл бұрын
My Uncle Glen Reed fought in this war and recently passed away this year in June of Alzheimer's disease.
@mac28575 жыл бұрын
Good riddance
@o_shok5 жыл бұрын
@@mac2857 bastard imbecile
@patrickweber87505 жыл бұрын
@@mac2857 Screw you Communism Loving Troll!
@keybchet99865 жыл бұрын
As a Korean, I respect your uncle.
@patrickweber87505 жыл бұрын
@@keybchet9986 gomabseubnia.
@Mr.HeisenbergTheCook5 жыл бұрын
Kim: Prepare for trouble... Mao:...and make it double!
@leexingha5 жыл бұрын
lol
@johnathantam4675 жыл бұрын
fun fact, the chinese took kims right to command after they saved that buffon.
@ShadowSumac5 жыл бұрын
@@johnathantam467 I like the fact that North Korea was controlled by a Soviet general for the first 5 years of its existence. To say that Kim was a puppet, is an understatement.
@LOL-zu1zr5 жыл бұрын
J T well it was Kim’s brilliant idea to attack an numerically superior UN force at Pusan, when his army already suffered heavy losses.
@Noacuracy5 жыл бұрын
Wooow
@hooderik86993 жыл бұрын
The Korean war was seen as a very significant battle for the newly founded PRC, it proved their ability to protect their interests despite going against the most advance military forces at the time. Truly respect for the sacrifices they've made for China. No longer the sick man of asian.
@hooderik86993 жыл бұрын
@@DLL-y4p commonsense of international relations
@user-gongaesa2 жыл бұрын
🇨🇳👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉🗑
@xianglung23062 жыл бұрын
@@user-gongaesa typical Narcissist from South Korea. Lap dog of Uncle Sam.
@azuaraikrezeul16772 жыл бұрын
@@user-gongaesa ROK was always attacked by the PLA.hmmm wonder why?
@softdrink-02 жыл бұрын
They bled needlessly. In fact they bled more than anyone else, fucking braindead generals
@bao92974 жыл бұрын
The Chinese hate war, but never fear war.
@t-gee75163 жыл бұрын
@Leftist Hunter you just fear your loans, debts, and stepping out your mom’s house.
@aaronj67863 жыл бұрын
Your American dad killed almost all indians
@泰恩-t7e3 жыл бұрын
@Leftist Hunter yes, that is why china is titled of Chinese people's Republic 中华人民共和国, why Chinese Army is named with people's liberation 中国人民解放军, and CPC is principal of serving the people with full heart 全心全意为人民服务, CPC is fearing that Chinese people cannot live in better conditions
@t-gee75163 жыл бұрын
@Leftist Hunter No. Trump is the best friend of China. Chinese people want Trump to be US President forever. But Democrats hates and fears Trump so they release COVID to kill Americans. You guys are so soft that kick Trump out! So disappointed! We really hope Trump could come back on 2024!
@emiliofermi99943 жыл бұрын
Then why has China always lost almost every war?? The Chinese always have been defeated and controlled by other peoples, such as Mongolians, Manchus, Xianbei, and Xiongnu. Chinese have been ruled by other peoples for more than 1400 years. The royal family that ruled the Chinese for such a long time were non-Chinese. They spoke Manchu and Mongolian etc, not Chinese.
@recordkeepingandinformatio82063 жыл бұрын
China: "hey US would you like your own Long March?"
@Tahkaullus015 жыл бұрын
General McArthur: "We'll be Home by Christmas!" Anyone with any sense: "You bastard."
@doaftheloaf4 жыл бұрын
if it wasn't for him, perhaps they could have been.
@vincentsong13554 жыл бұрын
McArthuer forgot the line: "In body bags."
@glennyang403 жыл бұрын
My father joined the PLA in 1950 to fight in Korean War. During a march he was hit by a stray bullet but didn't know. Afterwards he found the bullet in his pocket and a dictionary with a hole in it. He realized that the small dictionary which he put in his pocket had saved his life. When I asked him why he didn't keep it he said one day it got severly damaged in rain and pages stuck together in a mess. He had no choice but to abandon it. He passed away 7 years ago.
@yuluoxianjun3 жыл бұрын
respect and memory
@泰迪糕3 жыл бұрын
致敬
@circleancopan77483 жыл бұрын
Where did your old man assigned? Yeoncheon?
@yuanyuanxi2623 жыл бұрын
Your father is a great man. May he rest peacefully.
@user-gongaesa2 жыл бұрын
@@yuanyuanxi262 🇨🇳➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️🗑
@napoleonibonaparte71985 жыл бұрын
UN: You can’t defeat me. DPRK: I know, but he can... PRC: *毛主席万岁!中华民共和国万岁!*
@陈奕迅-r7b5 жыл бұрын
Stavros S. lmao
@tomxiao15 жыл бұрын
中华人民共和国万岁 lol
@markfutchll81415 жыл бұрын
China didn't defeat us cuz we're still there
@arbeiterz84915 жыл бұрын
@Stavros S. Northern Chinese eats wheat not rice
@雁門大同府5 жыл бұрын
Napoleon I Bonaparte 老毛万岁,美帝国主义及其走狗都是纸老虎
@stormrunner40815 жыл бұрын
Home by Christmas where have I heard that before
@ElBandito5 жыл бұрын
Probably all the way back during US Civil War.
@algr14955 жыл бұрын
World war 1
@gardard66383 жыл бұрын
finally an unbiased war theme video about the Korean war, I saw many videos about the Korean war only showed how great the USA and their allies was lol.
@leexingha3 жыл бұрын
u forget how righteous they were with their cause
@ffbeexaid45093 жыл бұрын
@@leexingha how righteous? Fukin US were gonna bomb our ass if we let them take North Korea.
@yueqi74993 жыл бұрын
@@ffbeexaid4509 I think he meant self righteous
@4WheelinChevy3 жыл бұрын
As if the ccp recently (again) didn't celebrate beating Japan. When Japan saved them from KMT because they hid with mao in the country after the long march, while KMT was fighting Japan. If Japan has only waited longer to invade.
@yueqi74993 жыл бұрын
@@4WheelinChevy the kmt can't beat shit.
@tylerwaxman75124 жыл бұрын
War class 101: Never mess with China, and don't bomb on China land no matter how many allies you have.
@201083924 жыл бұрын
@John C launch 1000 nukes to any place on earth will cause global nuclear winter. Anyone with such mind set should not be considered as human. Because it is against humanity.
@201083924 жыл бұрын
@John C Ok, maybe you are just trying to be funny, or your little brain can not process the result of 1000 nukes. So you can be considered as subhuman then
@201083924 жыл бұрын
@John C haha, what a Nazi. Well, no offence, you may enjoy this title anyway.
@UgandanAirForce4 жыл бұрын
wouldn't of mattered if we through with McArthur's plan of nuking the border to prevent Chinese intervention with radiation
@UgandanAirForce4 жыл бұрын
@Swan Finney you skip history class? No one except the us had nukes at the time
@bigdaz93635 жыл бұрын
Korea - prepare for trouble China - make in double Soviet union - il sit here in my bubble Edit : thanks for the likes
@O_Ozzzzz5 жыл бұрын
big daz you really a rapper!
@royzhang88854 жыл бұрын
Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, North Korea, Vietnam. Some country always invades.
@sakura74313 жыл бұрын
soviet joined the war with its airforce, but under China's leadership on the surface.
@carlos897845 жыл бұрын
The Chinese crawled for over 200 miles to get in position avoiding detection. What a feat!
@zzz88885 жыл бұрын
Lil Rawri westerners are used to stealing, colonizing, and forcing their views down other people’s throat
@carlos897845 жыл бұрын
@@zzz8888 I understand your comment in reply to Lil Rawri. But what you wrote only showed your own national insecurity, by projecting victimhood. I am very happy to be Portuguese and loved to learn our history of discovery, colonisation, the creation of settlements across Africa, Asia and Americas, the alliance with Ethiopia against Ottomans and the spread of Christianity. The amount of gold and silver we extracted from the soil, not stolen, that made Portugal the world's economy for nearly 100 years, followed by Spain, England, France and now United States.
@ShadowSumac5 жыл бұрын
@@zzz8888 Salty China troll detected.
@ShadowSumac5 жыл бұрын
@AIIUserNamesInvalid For most of its history China was busy fighting itself. Only after influence of the Soviets, the brutal dictatorship emerged which had stopped the infighting and subjugated the population of the country. It is hardly a natural progression, because, as we know from history and dictatorship has an expiration date.
@ShadowSumac5 жыл бұрын
@Lil Rawri I don't think it is aimed at "elite population", but to provide cheap workforce and cheap electorate, which will vote for those who enables them. In the past those were workers, who could be used like that, but nowadays most of the Western people are too educated and mistrustful of their governments, this is why they need to replace them with badly educate and dependable immigrants. The thing it is just a temporary measure, because, sooner or later kids of those immigrants will become educated and mistrustful again and the circle will start yet again.
@leehueymin4735 Жыл бұрын
The Chinese were outnumbered, no air support, no tanks, old weapons, low in ammunitions and with little provisions yet achieved such great result, it's remarkable and amazing. It's great strategy. Imagine Chinese were equipped better. Today Korean may be united and the government may not be the same. Could be as capitalist as China and embracing the world. Cold weather is Chinese greatest enemy, because of that many died and disabled. USA just want to involve in Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan to encompass China. Just like it encompasses Russia from Europe now reaching Ukraine not allowing Russia to ease.
@AAA-yo8lw4 жыл бұрын
USA: Retreat? hell no, we’re just attacking in a different direction. LOL
@XIVDALAILAMA5 жыл бұрын
Chinese forces had 300,000 men and antiquated equipment, the UN forces had 723,000 and state of the art weapons. What followed was the greatest defeat the US and its allies have ever tasted. Mao is correct in calling the US a Paper Tiger.
@ericchen67594 жыл бұрын
@Mr. Pretty Penis Well said, "Only a fucking idiot quotes false numbers, and then prides himself". Where did you quote Chinese lost over 10 times men as the US? Wiki mentioned China lost 183,108 men while US lost 36516 men. Also, China is not fighting against US only, South Korea alone lost 294,151 men.
@royzhang88854 жыл бұрын
@Mr. Pretty Penis We dont need to be controlled by army bro, we have good policeman, unlike US
@XIVDALAILAMA4 жыл бұрын
@@briant5685 We can see why the mighty US, the worlds sole "superpower", has been attacking major powers such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.
@j.vinton40394 жыл бұрын
The fact that the Chinese like to point fingers at our atrocities, while causally glossing over their atrocities and human rights violations is some rich shit.
@peiaoli78824 жыл бұрын
对死去的志愿军战士致以最崇高的敬意!
@hyltoniali2574 жыл бұрын
salute PVA!
@HyperInsomnia_4 жыл бұрын
@@peiaoli7882 speak in English
@peiaoli78824 жыл бұрын
@@HyperInsomnia_ 滚你妈,跟老子说中文
@HyperInsomnia_4 жыл бұрын
@@peiaoli7882 okay i understand your effort to liberate tibet and blame chinese goverment
@HyperInsomnia_4 жыл бұрын
@@peiaoli7882 no reply=china sucks
@andreastveranger13315 жыл бұрын
We will be home by Christmas. Two-Three years later: We will be home by Christmas
@jevonbrown1778 Жыл бұрын
The fact that China fought the United Nations in 1950 by choice is VERY CONCERNING, because they survived and weren't nearly as strong as they are today.
@derrickpeterson34005 жыл бұрын
"Retreat? Hell we are just attacking in a different direction!!" Said by O.P. Smith USMC. At Chosin.
@Nazeem20105 жыл бұрын
"Getting slaughtered? Hell, US GIs are just refusin' to live!!" Said by OP SMith, on the longest retreat in American military history
@qiuxianyelin91744 жыл бұрын
classic
@QingShanHao4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like said by Mr Trump.
@jhxu72934 жыл бұрын
"Elites? We came here to fight the elites!" Said Li Yunlong.
@williamswee43664 жыл бұрын
@@jhxu7293 fw 想挖人 我
@allomyself5 жыл бұрын
the virgin McArthur vs the chad Peng De Huai
@jakirhossain22515 жыл бұрын
Was he actually virgin??? I thought he raped thousands of phillipino slaves
@jakirhossain22515 жыл бұрын
@Juned Shaikh true.
@MaxwellCheung5 жыл бұрын
allomyself How did you know about Peng???holy~respect from a PLA😲
@alvintheng85015 жыл бұрын
Pang de huai, the greatest modern Chinese General alive, but he die in captivity during the cultural revolution purge. Mao indirectly kill him after using his patriotism. Sad story. He deserve more respect
@hyltoniali2574 жыл бұрын
Alvin Theng Lol, do u still wish to live after failed the duty of looking after the 1st born& crowned prince on the battlefield??
@james-yj7gp4 жыл бұрын
Chinese volunteers soldiers were very brave... They fought the American imperialist and its allies. At that time China was lack of weapons but the volunteers soldiers fought and win this brutal war. I salute to those brave soldiers.
@baoevan4503 жыл бұрын
Chinese soldiers believed that they were fighting for their home, and what did American soldiers fight for?that's a huge difference in mind.
@420skidrow3 жыл бұрын
i totally agree with you brother, han chinese has taken too much bullshit.
@hrcustom3 жыл бұрын
Those Chinese commie soldiers involved in this war were atrociously purged by the red guards during the Cultural revolution. That's a huge difference in the end.
@Paegan19835 жыл бұрын
My great uncle, William H. Johnson was lost during these battles. He is listed as MIA, and his remains were never recovered. The thought of him, and his constant presence in my grandfather's mind has always left a melancholy feeling in my family. His unit was 7th infantry regiment, F company, 2nd battalion, 3rd Infantry Division. He went MIA December 3rd, 1950, near Huk-su-ri. I've tried and tried to find more information on the particulars of his area of battle, but have come up mostly empty. Thanks for shedding some light on The Forgotten War.
@zeflute45864 жыл бұрын
War is tragic for all human kind. As a Chinese I'd like to solute your great uncle, regardless of political fights or ideology discrepancies. A soldier is a soldier, he seemed to be a remarkable man, a treasure of your family. We are after all only common people, striked by the wave of history. Sometimes it is not our choices. But the brutal history of warfare has made the world to value peaceful times. Let's hope there's no more wars, and we only fight in Olympics!
@Paegan19834 жыл бұрын
@@zeflute4586 Very kind of you. Your reply is very touching, and I appreciate your kind words. May the rest of the world share your ideology to begin the new decade
The Chinese did pretty well in the Korean War considering Mao said “miller’s and rifles”(小米加步枪)was how they won wars around that time...
@day21485 жыл бұрын
except most of the Chinese frontline commanders who returned from the war were traumatized by the sight of American firepower wiping out hundreds of their friends at a time, and the Chinese army has been obsessed with fire support ever since (which didn't do them much good in the brief war with Vietnam).
@mxn19485 жыл бұрын
@@day2148 well the war in vietnam happened right after the cultural revolution so its not surprising that the pla wasnt doing fantastic. that said, yes the american firepower was and still is great, hence why china measures its troops it measures then against american fire power, in fact it specifically arms and trains its army in the north(facing russia and korea) in the ameircan fashion, with emphases on modern fire team level equiptment and network support.
@day21485 жыл бұрын
@Hoàng Nguyên it's easy to win a defensive war when your country is in harsh terrain (ask the Germans how many teeth the Swiss broke from them over the centuries). Vietnam only gets bragging rights when it wins an offensive war in the enemy's terrain familiarity -- like when the Chinese defeated the Goturks in harsh Gobi desert.
@day21483 жыл бұрын
@@prastagus3 if you think prolonged border skirmishes between two powers are rare and count as a "war" then you need to read some history books lol!
@leipen71255 жыл бұрын
Imagine that if Syria experienced a ten-year civil war and ISIS invasion, when the United States attacked Iran, the Syrian army entered Iran and defeated the United States. The Korean War was similar to that situation. almost impossible
@Brwnsugar5 жыл бұрын
MCARTHUR should have stopped at the Korean border. Instead he pushed into Chinese territory and got China involved.
@vitaboost4 жыл бұрын
Based on where McArthur placed his army, it was pretty obvious he has plans to invade China. China had warned numerous times not to get too close to its borders.
@bignewlife6304 жыл бұрын
UN never crossed into Chinese territory at all. Truman was 100% on that. What was needed was US-China dialogue. Didn't happen until Nixon and Kissinger.
@vincentsong13554 жыл бұрын
Well, he did have plan to ship KMT troops from Taiwan to northeastern China. China warned him about the dangers of pushing too deep towards Chinese- Korean border. He simply ignored the message.
@bignewlife6304 жыл бұрын
@@vincentsong1355 yep he was wrong, Truman was right.
@ttemp26314 жыл бұрын
This is/was a proxy war between the great powers. China + Soviet Union fighting USA in Korea. The Korean suffered the most because the great powers were coward to confront each directly. We saw that in Korea and now in Syria. On the other hand, if the great powers confront each other directly there will be nothing left of the world and now only Korea and Syria are screwed.
@ludens34015 жыл бұрын
"Home by Christmas Offensive". Everyone: Hey I've seen this one before. Macarthur: What do you mean? It's brand new
@崔莱5 жыл бұрын
lol at his time yes, he invented it XD
@stewart25894 жыл бұрын
@@崔莱 to be fair, China just kept throwing soldiers at the coalition, the Chinese outnumber every army
@apei2814 жыл бұрын
Marathon 1 with such poorly equipped troops, the numbers won’t save anything, it’s all strategy
@jhxu72933 жыл бұрын
@@stewart2589 That's like an insult to the dead soldiers in WWI and the US troops in Korea.
@ergun99805 жыл бұрын
Hi K&G guys... I am writing this on behalf of a small group of guys who are interested in (unbiased) History : We keep on watching your videos with utmost pleasure. We just want say " keep up the good work" . We learn the history most-possible-unbiased way in your channel. GREETINGS FROM TURKEY.
@KingsandGenerals5 жыл бұрын
Teshekkur ederim :-)
@cochan73475 жыл бұрын
Hey since you are a turkish, I've got some question for you: eressea.pixnet.net/blog/post/2673355-%E5%9C%9F%E8%80%B3%E5%85%B6%E4%B9%8B%E6%97%85--%E4%BA%8C%E6%9C%88%E5%85%AB%E6%97%A5--%E8%BB%8D%E4%BA%8B%E5%8D%9A%E7%89%A9%E9%A4%A8 In this blog it says that a ROC flag was captured by the Turkish army in Korean war, now reserved in Istanbul Military Museum While the ROC (who just retreated to taiwan years ago) did not take part in neither side of the war.... and a Communist Chinese soldier would unlikely carry a ROC flag Can you do some research on the Turkish sites about this flag? I've really very curious about it
@yibinzhou62254 жыл бұрын
Out-gunned, out-equipped and poorly supplied CN light infantry staged continuous offence against highly technologically advanced US force, partitioning the later's formation under heavy artillery fire and air bombing. It was one of the most badass moment in modern military history. Homage to the most beloved people!!
@jr37534 жыл бұрын
Yet you couldn't get taiwan
@yibinzhou62254 жыл бұрын
@@jr3753 Oh I forgot who lost the entire mainland to the commie partisans even with all those confiscated Japanese armaments and American military aids....mmmmm....strange.....
@jameshau90484 жыл бұрын
j r the Americans had battleships in the straights. Also China was originally planning an invasion until this war happened. It’s ignorant to not give China credit for what they did in this war as they overcame extreme odds in order to EARN and fight for their freedom....after over a hundred years, destiny was in their own hands again, and they were willing to lay down their lives by the millions to kelp this precious freedom. Even if they cannot enjoy it at least their descendants have a chance to. Isn’t this what yiu Americans fight for? So why not respect what the Chinese accomplished? Remember warriors recognize warriors. True warriors seek eternity, for their ideals.
@xrli4 жыл бұрын
@@jr3753 Funny how u boast about Taiwan, when the PLA took the entirety of mainland China from the ROC lmao
@user-om2do9bk2v3 жыл бұрын
@@jr3753 Yet you couldn't concur Afghanistan, what a shame.
@matthewmcneany5 жыл бұрын
Animation in these modern warfare videos really is top notch.
@KingsandGenerals5 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@PrehistoricLEGO5 жыл бұрын
Tecumseh and the Korean War are probably my favorite videos or miniseries you guys have done, major props to the visual artists and the screen writers to make these historical events and people more whole 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@cleopatravii23854 жыл бұрын
Just found out about your channel. I’m fascinated with the work you’ve done, all the given information and 3D map designs.
@Hermit-Crab5 жыл бұрын
The Chinese military was extremely ill equipped at that time compared to the US. The Chinese economy was also very undeveloped. As a result, they were unable to support their push all the way to the South of the Korean peninsular. The US commander who replaced Douglas MacArthur, Matthew Ridgway, was very sharp to detect the weakness of the Chinese supply line and was able to capitalise on that to push the Chinese all the way back to the 38th parallel. Imagine this was the Chinese military at that time. Would the US be prepared to go to war with China now?
@dylanblack32792 жыл бұрын
Absolutely not. China would win in a landslide against wokeism.
@Hermit-Crab2 жыл бұрын
@@dylanblack3279 You are absolutely right. There's nothing that amazes me more than to watch the US self-destruct before my eyes.
@liewwilliam43342 жыл бұрын
Now it's a different ball game. China is a superpower now. The Chinese have whatever the US have, fighter jets, submarines, tanks, helicopters, space weapons, nuclear bombs. It will never be a walkover for US . Russia is now an ally of China. Both able to fight US and Nato.
@whocares9342 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure. But, I am afraid Biden will be the commander of the next engagement with China.
@loremasteringwion9930 Жыл бұрын
Chinese deaths: 600,000 American deaths: 35,000 Calling it a pyrrhic victory is generous.😂
@benishan34 жыл бұрын
*The longest retreat in US military history; withdrawal to the 38th Parallel*
@wolfu5974 жыл бұрын
When I think about the Chinese offensive in late 1950, I think about the 1st Marine and 7th Army division on the eastern side of the frontline. Thank you for making this video about the events on the western part of the frontline.
@Arindam_Gaming5 жыл бұрын
It was a battle of survival for China & North Korea hence their soldiers were fighting for home. Thats the highest motivation possible. Of course they routed the UN here. Its safer to say NATO than UN since all fighting under UN banner were US's puppies. Imagine if the Soviets also decided to intervene. Thats like the West fighting against both the Dragon & the Bear
@lyydbt4 жыл бұрын
中国当年为了立一个国,容易吗?打那么多仗,但凡是个中国人,都会对军人抱有最大的敬意
@alextyy3 жыл бұрын
中国人为什么要对西方反华共产党殖民者抱有敬意???
@mitchtherighteous5 жыл бұрын
I think that the USA's real blunder here was that they didn't sign up for War Thunder using the Kings and Generals promo code, and consequently did not receive a free premium ship and air upgrade and a 3 day account bonus which would have allowed them to retain control of the entire Kofean peninsula indefinitely.
@conqiucius5 жыл бұрын
I think, the real problem on the USA side is their much worshiped commander in chief Gen. Douglas McArthur. McArthur has gained his fighting experience mostly during the Pacific war with small scale battles on islands where he was hopping between them. This experience didn't help him further in such large scale infantry battle fields with more than 1 million troops. For example in a bigger land area like in Philippines he has failed completely against Japanese. The only idea McArthur had after the battles in video was asking for nukes. McArthur's successor Gen. Matthew B. Ridgway performed much better than him, because Matthew Ridgway has gained his experience in massive infantry battles against the much stronger Wehrmacht infantry of Nazi Germany.
@joshuajones90864 жыл бұрын
God i love this video the visuals and explanations is amazing
@jameszhou1625 жыл бұрын
The war my grandpa fought as a young lieutenant in PV Army. Though PVA was inferior in weapons and equipment, they were highly experienced soldiers thru Japanese war and civil war. It wasn’t pretty but they won respect from US soldiers by taking them back to 38 parallel. I still remember he said a boulder dropped from sky cleaving a young captain head open right in front and brain splashing everywhere. That was cruelty of a real war. Wish there would not be one like that anymore.
@muslimmetalman4 жыл бұрын
Respect and salute to your grandpa.
@chek81974 жыл бұрын
向英雄致敬!
@lbchen61604 жыл бұрын
The Taiwanese should be informed what a real war is. They think it’s like a video game
@AVWUVU3 жыл бұрын
@Edward I mean, it's entirely possible. The US definitely won't come saving them. Taiwan has one of the weakest military.
@TheBooklyBreakdown3 жыл бұрын
@@lbchen6160 Yes you could probably overpower Taiwan if you really wanted to...But WHY? Are they not Chinese people too?? Why bring warfare to your own family??
@antigonos30124 жыл бұрын
China: I’ll intervene if you try to conquer the north MacArthur: Does it anyway China: Invades MacArthur: Surprised pikachu face
@tingwang94654 жыл бұрын
China is not the invading party. China never had wanted to occupy Korea’s land. Instead China was asked for help from the leader of Korea to send troops to intervene. As a matter of fact once the war is over, Chinese troops retreated with no delay.
@호이팬4 жыл бұрын
@@tingwang9465 In that sense, the USA did not invade Korea either. Taiwan No.1 1989 June 4th Tiananmen
@honeybadgerdavid6634 жыл бұрын
@@호이팬 IU sucks chinese cork
@jhxu72935 жыл бұрын
I have to say the 2nd Phase Offensive of Peng is just masterpiece.
@WBCY20243 жыл бұрын
Pincer movement. They split the entire UN front line into 2, encircling more than 5 entire UN divisions and causing thousands of casualties. Other than the Vietnam war (which the Chinese were also involved in), US hasn’t been defeated like this since WW2.
@andro78625 жыл бұрын
I am geniunely by the PLA's conduct in this war. I mean they fought hard and well.
@yuchenwang65854 жыл бұрын
PVA, not PLA
@yuchenwang65853 жыл бұрын
@Zayed Goki Not exactly ...
@yuchenwang65853 жыл бұрын
@Zayed Goki Well ... it is turely not means too much for a foreigner, then that is ok.
@yuchenwang65853 жыл бұрын
@Zayed Goki Mainland China of course. I dont think people from taiwan would care the PVA and PLA thing, XD. Usually they treat CPC related thing as a whole from an ideology perspective.
@WBCY20243 жыл бұрын
These are seasoned veterans. They fought the WW2 against Japan and the subsequent Chinese civil war, both of which were grand battles involving years of fighting and tens of millions of soldiers. The UN forces were also veterans but definitely didn’t experience as many hardship as the Chinese force and weren’t as tough and willing to sacrifice.
@jamesscott2894 Жыл бұрын
Dang, the relatively simplistic, but somehow at the exact same time detailed map and icons made understanding the War sooooo much easier for me (especially as a visual learner. Like I can read the Wiki article and history books, but place names tend to just blur together (not just Korean, even French and Italian campaigns and whatnot) for me and tend to lose track...but this was absolutely superb towards helping me understand the situations in who was attacking where and how that affected their neighboring flanks, and even the roads and bridges over the rivers and whatnot. Love it, hope for more
@elrey76085 жыл бұрын
Fewer people realise that at the end of this video: 1. the role of North and South Korea was very different and almost reversed of what is nows as North was then a industrial powerhouse and South was then a Pro-West junta, 2. In 10 years (1940 - 1950) China went from a weakling that couldn't even defend against the Japanese in WW2 into taking 500K US troops head on with fewer men as at the point in time in the video, 3. Had ceasefire been made as Marshal Peng De Huai had wished for Korean War is a victory for China at this point with its military objectives fully achieved (regrettedbly this didnt happen as you will see in later videos), 4. Pre- 1958 China was advancing at a rapid pace but unfortunately stagnated for the next 30 years until Deng Xiao PIng's reforms in the 80s, if this 30 year stagnation didn't occur, China could have easily over taken any of its neighbour by the 90s and the world would look very different today
@matthewli97295 жыл бұрын
you got one thing wrong. Deng's reform could not be possible without late 70's re-establishment of US-China diplomatic relation. In other words, China's development owed to the unique geo-political situation it was in.
@jhxu72935 жыл бұрын
39th army is called Iron Army for a reason, that reason is right in the video.
@ezradja5 жыл бұрын
Basically, there would be no North Korea without Mc Arthur. Great work, General.
@jaybadayatherockmerchant98325 жыл бұрын
Kings and Generals is one of those channels you leave a like even before watching.
@chetterzhou36304 жыл бұрын
This war was so significant for China who just raised from hundreds years of weakness
@Rex-ww4cw3 жыл бұрын
Hundreds years of humiliation
@Phantom-bh5ru3 жыл бұрын
They were out from a hundred years of being bullied, attacked and looked down upon from other nations, and the first thing they did to completely eradicate any further notions that they will return to such state was to defeat the most powerful nation and her combined allies.
@mexicoball25295 жыл бұрын
*Angrily spams nuke Button in McArthur*
@jnhg98084 жыл бұрын
It would of been an one-sided mascre if the Chinese Army was as well equipped as the UN forces were.
@ultimateedgelord35863 жыл бұрын
Lol no US lost around 37000 troops while it is estimated China lost 180000 to 900000 troops. Considering China still refuses to release the official number, safe to say that the casualty is a lot more higher than 180000.
@jnhg98083 жыл бұрын
@@ultimateedgelord3586 While the US lost less than China in terms of casualty, you're forgetting the total casualty of UN troops are for greater than the Chinese troops, remember it not just US vs China, it's China vs 16 nations UN Alliance. south Korea alone lost more than half a million troops, it's well documented, look it up.
@ultimateedgelord35863 жыл бұрын
@@jnhg9808 "total casualty of UN troops are for greater than the Chinese troops" You included the entire UN side but on the aggressor side u chose to include only the Chinese and not the Soviets and North Koreans as well? Lol nice double standards. Total UN casualty was 170927 which is still lower than the 180000+ Chinese casualties estimate. Kind of tells you something about Chinese army efficiency.
@wanmaster113 жыл бұрын
@@ultimateedgelord3586 Soviets did not fight in the ear
@ultimateedgelord35863 жыл бұрын
@@wanmaster11 yes they did, they flew Mig15s to counter united nations air force.
@nathanremix58005 жыл бұрын
America : Yeah We Winning This War And We Will Destroy Communism In Korea China : Imma Do What Called Pro Gamer Move America : *WAIT THAT ILLEGAL*
@JunWisewar5 жыл бұрын
*Boss music*
@nathanremix58005 жыл бұрын
@@JunWisewar no it butterfly music from chinese cheap toy phone . *Ayeayeaye im your little butterfly*
@diemannschaftweltmeister81975 жыл бұрын
@@eodyn7 Well, to realize your assumption, you will have to think of a way to persuade all Americans to fight another total war 5 years after WW2. The US mobilized a bit more than 10 million soldiers in WW2 and several million in the Korean War. I would say that was all the military could get at that time.
@mexicoball25295 жыл бұрын
@@eodyn7 Yeah i dont think that Truman would go and say *Who wants to fight a total war against China and North Korea to die for a useless fucking Peninsula.*
@maxmagnus7775 жыл бұрын
@@eodyn7 well for starters they did have as much man as their enemies. They did have tanks superiority. They did have air superiority. They did have gun and mortar superiority. More US troops would mean that China sends more troops. That would mean more death on all sides. China had unlimited manpower to waste. Imagine having lost lets say 3 times more man. That would make it 600 000 dead Americans and 1 500 000 dead Chinese. War is a nasty business. Imagine that US had sent 10 times more troops. What would that lead to? 2 000 000 dead US troops?! You really want that?
@benishan34 жыл бұрын
Withdrawal to the 38th Parallel is referred to as *"the longest retreat in US military history."*
@cochan73475 жыл бұрын
300k chinese + 70k n.korean vs 723k UN forces yet people say that chinese win the battles by human wave
@notbeiliu15395 жыл бұрын
Welcome to the world of ideology.
@notbeiliu15395 жыл бұрын
After read like dozens of comments and their replies, I have given up in understanding the video historically. I do believe though, every government serve and should serve who built them. To each nation, these people are different. That’s why the world hasn’t united, either way.
@jason89235 жыл бұрын
Technically a "human wave attack" used by the Chinese troops was actually a tactic that made a lot of sense. It's something like the fire and maneuver strategies.
@zeflute45864 жыл бұрын
@@jason8923 there's none human wave attacks anymore, not after WW I. Only in movies. So stop being ignorant and stop saying that.
@jason89234 жыл бұрын
@@zeflute4586 ok
@yaoypl4 жыл бұрын
Western power need to learn the bloody lesson: when China warms and it means business.
@stewart25894 жыл бұрын
In defense of the west, North Korea started the war
@Rex-ww4cw4 жыл бұрын
@@stewart2589 but the west is the one that cause China to intervene
@hellenchen37654 жыл бұрын
@VANAM STORM lol
@ddt77423 жыл бұрын
@@stewart2589 it's their own business.doesn't it?because that's their civil war.but when USA involved.that's a different story.
@johnl10915 жыл бұрын
My great uncle was a Marine Captain and company commander at Chosin Reservoir. He described the Chinese counter attack there like it was as if someone ripped open an ant hill. He nearly shot one of his platoon commanders for cowardice.
@tttcp55465 жыл бұрын
Because Chinese have been in total war for about 40 years before korean war,the army has no fear of death.I read the documentry,says that soilders hold the mortars and ran after the UN army,RUN AND FIRE during the UN retreat to the coastline.Lots of soilders blocked the submachine guns with their chest and blow up themselves with their enenmy at the same time.That's totally insane.
@zsarimaxim6925 жыл бұрын
Notice the UN forces out number the Chinese, more than double the number in the first and second phase especially.
@xasthurwithin41785 жыл бұрын
@@zsarimaxim692 yet people love to throw around that racist cliche of "Chinese bugmen"
@tareke5865 жыл бұрын
Saruv Bet clearly not
@sergelengerelmaa24504 жыл бұрын
@Saruv Bet back to /pol incel
@charlesthepaperman5 жыл бұрын
5:51 "home by Christmas" this never gets old 🤦♂️
@NB972345 жыл бұрын
if you watch tiktok videos you would know the Chinese victory was inevitable
@NoDoubt99103 жыл бұрын
Love the way this guy narrates, evacuation of 100k strong is deemed a "chrismas miracle"
@eugenebraxton29875 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how battles, wars can turn around because of a lack of respect. Keep your foot on the pedal!!!! Never under value your foe!!!!
@Lordboring14785 жыл бұрын
How did you get the Kings and generals helmet beside your username?
@Ideo7Z5 жыл бұрын
And pretty soon it was Mao's turn trying to push down the 38th parallel...
@linhhoang13635 жыл бұрын
In war it's very blurry of the line between underestimating your opponent and trying to take the advantage. The reality is not that easy and simple like a word you've said.
@lolwutyoumad5 жыл бұрын
@Tecumseh Mess for who? The NK situation works out just great for China
@lolwutyoumad5 жыл бұрын
@@nottoday3817 lol pretty much. Even after the Korean War the South was so poor that almost half of the SK economy was based around prostitution to American soliders Guess they don't like to tell people THAT
@ethanjiang87665 жыл бұрын
"It is well that war is so terrible, otherwise we should grow too fond of it." ---Robert E. Lee
@sunahangrai91154 жыл бұрын
I used to be worried that only china had to owe heavy loss in korean war . Yesterday watched the statistical data and compared chinese loss with that of south korea, usa and north korea and assured myself that his loss was normal but his effort was really the great .
@asminrai35363 жыл бұрын
What are u saying girl . If u are telling china indeed won war but with heavy casualties and dead so it was not worth it . Then in ww2 USA soviet UK China almost lost 60 million 6 corer people .while Japan lost about 3 million 30 lakh people and Germany lost 7 million people . By yr saying it means axis won the war bcz of heavy dead on allied group
@user-gongaesa2 жыл бұрын
🇨🇳👉👉👉👉👉🗑
@AVWUVU2 жыл бұрын
@@user-gongaesa Lmao, more like KR going in the trash with how your economy is failing.
@softdrink-0 Жыл бұрын
China lost more soldiers than anyone else in the war.
@davidxu33574 жыл бұрын
Great video, but I think these little soldier models that represent forces on the map are a bit misleading. While the UN troops were well equipped with tanks and cannons, had full air control, and enjoyed suprior supplies, soldiers on the Chinese side pretty much fought with only rifles and hand grenades. Because of the US air force's diligent work, Chinese trooped had huge difficulty in supplying food and clothing. More Chinese were killed by mal-nutrition and cold winter than by bullets. They could have done much much better, if they had 1/3 of what the UN soldiers had. Despite that, the Chinese troops managed to crush the UN troops and hold the line. This feat was achieved with innovative military tactics, a powerful command system, and individual soldiers' valor and loyalty. Hunderds of platoons of young soldiers willingly sacrificed their own lives, just to buy some time for their friendly forces to prepare defense or initiate a deadly attack. In many cases, UN soldiers found that Chinese soldiers waiting for them in an ambush were already frozen to death, even if they could escape from their duty and survive. These were the best soldiers in all human history. Hope politicians of both countries learn from history and cherish the peace.
@sammy_trix2 жыл бұрын
I wished CCP will stop bullying their Asian brothers and give up the lands that they built in the backyard of their close neighbors. By doing what is right will help to spread love and respect. Nobody would win in a war, so it is better to leave this barbaric actions to a truly civilized humanity.
@thesovietshark8945 Жыл бұрын
@@sammy_trixccp hasnt invaded anyone for like 4 decades