6 Months With The Fuji GFX System - A Film Shooter's Review

Head to squarespace.co... to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code: KYLEMCDOUGALL
Pre-order my new book ‘An American Mile’: bit.ly/3Og6Z45
After roughly six months of shooting with both the GFX50R and GFX100S, I wanted to put together this review to share my thoughts about this digital system, as someone who has worked primarily with film for the past five years. I cover things like image quality compared to film, the medium format sensor and if it has a ‘look’, and if I’d consider switching to the GFX completely.
Intro: 00:00
Why the GFX?: 00:48
Medium Format Sensor Benefits: 02:13
Lenses: 03:57
Sponsor Message: 04:54
Lenses Continued: 05:45
Image Quality: 8:45
GFX Image Compared To Film: 10:56
Dislikes: 12:15
Final Thoughts: 13:27
►Follow me on Instagram: / kyle__mcdougall
►Order my new book ‘An American Mile’: bit.ly/3Og6Z45
►*DISCLAIMER*
Some of the links below are affiliate links, where I earn a small commission if you click on the link and purchase an item. The money I earn helps me make this type of content consistently.
►GEAR USED IN THIS VIDEO(*these are affiliate links):
Fuji GFX 50R: ebay.us/aZpMIP
Fuji GFX 100S: ebay.us/w8vvx8
Fuji GF 50mm 3.5: ebay.us/xXqvqJ
Fuji GF 35-70mm: ebay.us/xZy5yz
Fuji GF 32-64mm: ebay.us/JZ7fIr
Mitakon 65mm f1.4: ebay.us/yfu9NG
Pentax 645 A 45mm f2.8: ebay.us/S4lG09
Pentax 645 A 75mm f2.8: ebay.us/FErmOP
Contax Zeiss CY 45mm f2.8: ebay.us/h0agM2
Kipon P645 to GFX Adapter: ebay.us/jearrc
Kipon EF to GFX Adapter: ebay.us/OBdZsp
My '35mm Film Photography Course' on Skillshare (FREE with this link): skl.sh/2JrGhFs
My 'Medium Format Film Photography Course' on Skillshare (FREE with this link): skl.sh/3r7KLta
Where I source music for my videos (One FREE month with this link): fm.pxf.io/c/19...
Videos on this channel are filmed using the Fuji X-H2s: bhpho.to/3UEjFVs
►FILM PHOTOGRAPHY GEAR (*these are affiliate links):
My go-to medium format camera: ebay.us/GaK9Kp
My favourite 35mm film camera: ebay.us/82WyVI
My favourite 35mm film lens: ebay.us/u0V817
My favourite medium format travel camera: ebay.us/FVcfWk
My go-to light meter: ebay.us/QIFXF0
My favourite film stock: ebay.us/orbudp
My favourite 645 medium format film camera: ebay.us/ydY4HK
→Instagram: bit.ly/2GuYV21
→Website: kmcdougall.com

[@crashly1000]

First time I have ever added a comment to a You Tube video. As a full time professional photographer for over 40 years I have been through the film to digital transition. To this day I still struggle with the working daily with digital and working with film for my personal work. This video presents such a well balanced, personal argument as to the pros and cons of each form of capture. Well done.. you have put it all in a perspective that sees you apart from fan boys of either side.

[@KyleMcDougall]

I appreciate the comment, Ashley! Glad you enjoyed this one.

[@crashly1000]

@Phillip Banes I love the look and the mechanics of film. I keep going back to it for my personal work but for every gem I get a lot of disappointing images.

[@crashly1000]

@Phillip Banes I think you are about 90 percent right.

[@ModernVintageFilm]

@Phillip Banes Actual chemistry and physical changes on film. It's so raw to me, compared to digital.

[@marcp.1752]

Digital, you can easily manipulate everything, especially nowadays. Film does feel just right for me, and way more emotional, from the whole picture creating process. Film is real. With digital....uhum, can your fave RAW converter into the next 10+ years still recognize your used RAW format? A film camera which works, can even being used into decades from now....a high end DSLR, DSLM nowadays...into 5-10+ years from now, goes from uber expensive to just "meh" into value...down. Since technology advances that fast. Or take phones...all 3-6 months new models....gosh.

[@mikedruce1701]

Professional studio photographer here -- Fuji is absolutely killing it with their digital medium format cameras. They've been slowly making their way into mainstream workflows and it makes me so happy. I remember being so excited to using the 100s on set. It's a beast. I'm about to switch over to the 50R this tax season for the same reasons you talked about. Great video!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thanks for watching, Mike!

[@zach.sorensen]

A buddy of mine just let me borrow his GFX50R and I’ve absolutely loved it. He offered a crazy deal and I’ve been on the fence trying to decide how I can work it into my workflow, and this video really solidified it. I’ve got the same Pentax lenses as well as the native Fuji 50 3.5. I think I’ll be happy with that combination to slow my film use a bit

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, Zach. I'm sure you'll be happy with it!

[@rf8221]

I've had my Hasselblad H1 for a little while now and have shot many rolls of film through it. I recently had the opportunity to acquire a near full frame CCD Phase One P25+ back for my Hasselblad for a fraction of the original cost. My experience shooting digital has been fantastic. Being able to shoot both film and digital on the same camera body is great and the files from old "fat pixel CCD backs" are fantastic. As long as you understand and can work with CCD's limitations you can get stellar results.

[@KyleMcDougall]

That's been a tempting route that I've researched at times. I'm also interested in those old CCD backs.

@@KyleMcDougall give it a try Kyle. I'm in a similar place, since I'm starting my film journey (from well, not too many months ago, but always loved film), and also I've been using those CCD backs for a decade. I'll just say this: since I understand the qualities you're after, you'll love CCD backs. Personally, I couldn't care less for those 44x33 CMOS MF cameras (all of them without exception), because being CMOS they're essentially like any other "FF" Canon, Nikon, Sony. But once you try those CCD backs, you immediately see something else. I have the P25, as well as a 31mp Hassy back. If I were to recommend, take a look at the P45+. It's a Kodak sensor, with INSANE Kodak colors, and fat pixels being a 49x37 mm back. That one or the P65+ are rapidly getting cheaper. The P65+ is a FF 645 sensor, and starting to become quite affordable. Give it a try.

[@meeno_the_man]

That, my dude, was a GREAT review. A photographer talking about the essential experience of shooting with the machines. Yes! Pixel Peeping is not photography, it may be the photo part, the graphy, the writing, the poetry, that’s something else entirely. And the caliber of your work speaks volumes to your appreciation of that magic dance that is the coalescing of human and machine to make art. Bravo. Your work and words are inspiring.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Really appreciate that. Thank you.

[@Humungojerry]

another thing about film is the low number of frames you come back with. it’s similar to the look being dialled in…with digital you come back with 100s of frames to sort through, some of which can be very similar. i love having that for many scenarios but there’s something refreshing about only having a few frames to pick from

[@256k_]

double edged sword too, sometimes you take some shots but can't see them until you finish the roll, but that takes a while or you blast through film. sometimes you just wanna see the photos. both mediums are fun and creative in their own way.

[@paulred158]

I can go out with my GFX for an afternoon and still only shoot 4 frames. 20 years of MF film has made me try and edit before pushing the shutter. I get overwhelmed if I have more than 10 frames to edit or work on in a session.

[@elmelmon]

Film forces you to be selective and to slow down. I already know how my images will turn out through years of trial and error but it's the subject matter and the right composition at least for my eye.

[@otm646]

If you are feeling overwhelmed that means there's a problem with your workflow. For example the OM software stacks the bursts for easy review and A to B. It's very very quick to sort through and rank your favorites.

[@christopherward5065]

You have a very laconic and soulful feel in your work and, the look of your images evokes film regardless of whether it is or not. I end up making filmic images too because that is the tradition of my becoming a photographer. The aesthetic has moved on to fit what digital cameras bring to the medium and yet strangely, the subtleties of film are becoming better understood by photographers who have only ever learnt their craft in digital photography. I may need to bend my path towards Fujifilm’s medium format to see what I can do with it… you’ve made me think a lot more about what’s possible.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thanks for that, Christopher. I do think that regardless of digital or film, the final look of an image will mostly be guided by the photographer's eye and processing decisions. I started my journey in school for film, then worked professionally with digital for many years, and then to film again for my personal work about five years ago. I like to think that I've taken little bits from it all.

[@coloring_again]

I’m glad I didn’t sell mine. I’ve been getting a little depressed with the rise of film prices. Being new to film and discovering all the film stocks and trying SLRs, Rangefinders, etc I’ve really fallen in love with film and the process of it. Although, with some people able to afford film daily and shoot it seemingly non stop I’ve felt like shooting digital has been almost shamed upon at least to me. Mostly by those on a specific platform whether it be IG, twitter, and grainery. I know I shouldn’t let others determine my choices or what I shoot, but I am damn jealous of those that have their film collection started. Great video and I’ll make sure I am more grateful for what I have moving forward. Have a great day ❤

[@mynewcolour]

I see a future of bulkloaded HP5 and Rodinal 1+100 🔮 Embrace it.

[@familymanbarrett]

Shoot with what you enjoy. Some days I pick up the film camera, some days the digital. Don't let anyone dictate what makes you happy. They're all just pictures after all.

[@mpk33]

"You do you, Booboo." - Aba & Preach

[@256k_]

shot with what works for you, the end result is the important part. your expression through the medium of photography, you want it expressed on film or in digital with any look you want then that's the right way for you. personally my main camera for shooting now is a grIII, something i never expected to like but ended up loving. it's always in my pocket whenever i go out and the results are great. and for special occasions i use film. find your balance

[@KyleMcDougall]

Embrace what works best for you, and what you enjoy the most. The format that you choose to shoot with will factor very little into the final success of your images. Use what you enjoy, what you can afford, and what meets your needs (both technical and creative).

[@EzyRyder1]

You pretty much summed up my feelings / thoughts about film vs digital. For me, digital sometimes has too much room to play with whereas film has the look it has and you kinda have to go with that. This, for me, is often a positive side of film (pun not intended) photography - I don't lose myself in a sea of endless possibilities for editing. I still shoot both (most often based on what I happen to have laying around).

[@TheRenalicious]

I'm so glad we live in a time where both film and digital are still available, and an option for those who want it.

[@lubomirlukco5772]

Very good video, nonsense free and on point. I used to have 645 and 6x7 Mamiyas + Horseman and Sinar large format cameras + bunch of lenses both medium and large format + complete dark room setup. Sold it ALL to buy GFX 50R + some lenses and I couldn't be happier! I would have never thought something like this could happen to me. I shot film all my life and truly despised digital. With kids and family there just was no time, no place and money to handle the film process anymore. Go ahead film lovers, give GFX a go!!!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thank you, Lubomir. 🙏

[@Jimbojam]

I've been shooting film for almost 40 years. recently just sold my Hasselblad and twin lens Rollei, because of the GFX 100s. Getting awesome scans from film was always a problem for me and after seeing 102 megapixels with these great lenses, I finally let go of film. it is still in my heart, that feeling of the process and I can carry it in the shooting of digital but not having to pay for the film and processing and scanning makes me giggle. The GFX 100s costs the same as my Rollei !

[@c.augustin]

Every good tool has its uses. I think we live in a time where we have more choices than ever before (it might not last), so everyone can find what suits him/her best. For some types of photography film is still the way to go (or even the only option, like with 4x5 pinhole), for other types digital is totally fine (no matter the sensor size). Shooting film can be damn expensive, so there have to be good reasons to do it (like having fun, a valid reason in my book). A very good video, and very relatable.

[@anthonysmith3383]

Great review and a very honest take on the film vs digital debate. I shoot medium format on a Pentax 645 and Fuji G617 but honestly I could totally go to a GFX 50/100. The images it produces are truly beautiful even if you don't like digital. Shooting a high MP digital body is not as easy as you'd think. It reveals so much detail.

[@anta40]

GFX system is awesome. For me, it's not a film replacement (I still happily shoot with old medium format film gears). It's a replacement for full frame :D

[@robertgruber982]

Sold my Mamiya 7 w/65mm and 150mm to buy a Fuji 50R with the 63mm. Used it for awhile. Took it to Japan on a long trip. It's a fine camera but didn't like all the futzing I had to do to essentially get what I was getting with the Mamiya. Sold the 50R, re-bought a Mamiya 7 II and and the 80mm (which are much more expensive now) and couldn't be happier. The Fuji's are nice cameras but all in all I much prefer shooting Portra to trying to get the "portra look" from the Fuji. I really like getting a batch of film scans from the lab and doing some quick adjustments in Lightroom and being done. 90% of the time I'm happy with the scans as is. Also never have to think about if a battery is charged. I've had the same battery in the Mamiya for several years and have a spare in the bag that I might need someday.

[@robertgruber982]

@Phillip Banes Of course not. What I'm saying is that I'm much more satisfied with my scans than from what comes out of the camera with the 50R so fewer are adjustments are necessary. For me both the shooting and editing process are just more satisfying with film. An expensive but valuable lesson for me. Your mileage may vary.

[@robertgruber982]

@Phillip Banes And yet it still won't look how I want it to look. There are two components here, the pleasure of the process and the end product. In both instances for me (and it would seem if you read between the lines of the video for Kyle as well) film works better. Your experience may be differnt in one or both aspects. But no amount of arguing will convince me that this is the correct solution for me. I've done the comparison, made the investment and put in the time with the 50R and I prefer the Mamiya 7 and film in general. My only point in making these comments is to save others who may be on the fence the time and expense of repeating the process. If you prefer the 50R (or another similar camera) please enjoy it I'm not trying to convince you otherwise.

[@webmaster4ZLCB]

The images in this video are absolutely OUTSTANDING!!!

[@KNURKonesur]

It's an interesting case. I've been banging on a drum for years that we need a affordable full frame 645 camera to use some exotic portrait lenses not available for 35 format cameras. I used to complain that the GFX/H1D with their 44x33mm sensors don't give a big enough sensor to utilize some of the "real" medium format lenses in their full potential, but on the other hand it opened another world of utilizing 35 format lenses above their planned potential. Lenses like Contax Planar 50/1.4 shine even more than ever. The GFX is an exotic portrait shooter dream camera nowadays.

[@benyyz]

The 44x33mm sensor is just not that different enough from 35mm format for me to consider switching to the GFX system.

[@KNURKonesur]

@@benyyz it all depends on what you shoot. If you do street or landscape or weddings, it's probably not worth it. If you mostly do portraits with oldschool funky bokeh backgrounds, it squeezes the limits of many lenses. Like the Contax Planar 50/1.4 I mentioned "becomes" a 40/1.1, or a Biotar 75/1.5 "becomes" a 58/1.2, which is very tempting to people like me. And there's dozens of lenses from 35 format that cover the 44x33 sensor easily. But I get it's a niche and not applicable to a lot of people's style.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Yeah, it would be nice if the GFX system had a true 645 size sensor, but then it probably would no longer fall into the 'affordable' category. Let's see where things go though. With how quick technology is advancing, and how affordable it's getting, I'm sure it won't be long before we start seeing even larger sensors available for reasonable prices.

[@KingGameReview]

I picked up a used GFX50R earlier this year and I totally fell in love. It's by far my favorite camera I've ever used.

[@mntlpics]

Thanks for the well thought out video. So much great info. here. Yeah, I used to lug that Pentax 6X7 around, and was always a film person, but one day a few years ago I thought damn, here it is 2020, rockets are coming back from space and landing on platforms, and I'm still dealing with dust on my film! Not to mention, I felt guilty as hell as I dumped chemicals down the drain and watched beautiful clear drinking water being wasted down the drain during the rinse process ( I live in California ). So, I made the switch to the Fujifilm 50s and have never looked back. As you say, it all ends up in a digital form anyway, and as one of the commenters said, stay away from presets and you are so good to go. I print on matte hahnemule rag paper on a canon 2100, the results are truly outstanding. Like any art, there are subtle ways to create something unique and beautiful, and for me, digital at this level does it. I used to be a purist as far as process, as I've gotten older, I don't have much of an interest in the process, it either looks good to me or it doesn't. Shoot with a hassy or a iphone, if the outcome is amazing, it's amazing.

[@moisie13]

I have tried it all, nothing does it like RZ+Nikon 9000ed and Ektar for me. I have printed 60inches directly without any ps editing from scans and got natural, warm, grainy but sharp works for exhibition purposes. Digital files...so clean, still clinical even when emulating film looks. Good for fashion, editorial, commercial work when client needs hi-res and 1500 images from a shoot. I believe that if anyone tries medium to large format with proper scanning, you will never forget the results and that will hunt you haha

[@chevy2die]

I've found The Archetype Process profiles for Kodak are a perfect starting point for editing digital. I just use them for everything now to start out. I even apply them to my own film scans sometimes.

[@RussellAlboroto]

Archetype is definitely the best film emulation on the market.

[@chevy2die]

@@RussellAlboroto Especially with Fuji cameras. With my X100V and a Glimmerglass 1 with TAP profiles, so hard to beat. It looks just like film.

[@AdrianTache]

Have you tried the Lapardin ones?

[@chevy2die]

@@AdrianTache no, never heard of them. I’ll check it out

[@robbie154]

hook a brotha up

[@KGeorge-1]

This was an awesome and inspiring video for me to see at this stage of my "therapy hobby!" I love the simplicity of your pictures and what you're producing. Definitely a film frame of mind with a digital camera. Thanks Kyle

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thank you, Kevin! Glad you enjoyed this one.

[@nevvanclarke9225]

I have been with Fuji now for about two years and upgraded to medium format about six months ago and I do not regret my decision. It is the smartest thing I ever did. Yes the gear is a little bit heavier but not really that much heavier than most other cameras. If I'm carrying my gear over a day I'm talking about one kilo if I lose 1 kg of body weight and get stronger in the gym I can easily carry that gear. Also a better fitting backpack but I love the Fuji gear. It is just something else and I did a big print the other day for a customer and we stood in front of it and the lady said to me wow that feels like I'm standing on the rock. It literally does take life like images that no other camera that I've seen maybe the phase one and hasselblad probably do the same but I've never got that look with a full frame camera or APC. I could take nice pictures with those cameras. Don't get me wrong but with a medium format you actually take a scene not a photo. You take the customer into the scene you take them back to that beach or into the mountains they feel like they're there and that's the difference between medium format and it's largely due to the level of detail in the photos. Every part of the image captured. Write feels like you're there. Feels like you can touch that leaf in front of you.

[@elmelmon]

I love film! The entire process from film section to developing, that's how I started 35 years ago. I like digital but since I make images for personal use I use film more. I do the occasional job but I go at my own pace when it's personal and I love that.

[@jasongold6751]

A super informative video! I was a pro who long ago, walked, no, ran away from LF! Medium format 6x4.5, 6x6 and 6x7 is way bigger than 35! Digital MF is slightly bigger. Looking at Pro scans of older film shots, I'm so heartbroken! They are plain lousy! Film projection/enlargement is another world. Way better. But Digital makes more sense. Time! Cost! Convenience! My opinion! I can never afford the costs of Film and processing! Nor that Fuji camera .I have never enjoyed BIG Heavy cameras. Best day with Pentax 6x7 and lenses, traded at Samys CA in LA.! Happy with Leica M6! why sample images from US and Canada? Anyway Bravo!

[@sethcashman1011]

Excellent commentary! Thanks! I am a former film shooter (though I migrated to digital years ago for the convenience and ease of fill manipulation) who has been seriously considering a GFX for a couple of years now. Have shot with a 100s a couple of times and have been mightily impressed.

[@MarshallBananar]

I just realized the fact such a camera could let me adapt all sorts of glass, even M mount, and that it would be great to be able to mount all of that on the same platform I've made the switch from film to using the X-Pro3 for almost a year now, and have really enjoyed finding my process, and going to almost mainly doing light edits on my JPEGs, realizing I could do the same with a GFX and use my vintage glass, if needed cropping down to 24x35 when I feel like it sounds really good This video might just have planted a seed I'm afraid I won't be able to stop growing in a corner of my mind I hope they'll go wild some day and make a GXF R camera with the X-Pro's optical viewfinder, that would be ridiculous and awesome

[@KyleMcDougall]

I too wish for a GFX with an optical viewfinder similar to the X-Pro. That would be amazing!

[@spaceman77777]

That was valuable. Yes the slow process of film is just as important as the end print. Limitations are a creative spur.

[@spaceman77777]

@Phillip Banes true

[@RostykMakushak]

:) Greetings from Ottawa! 🇨🇦 Kyle, thanks for this lovely video. After watching your original video about GFX50R I pulled the trigger and bought one for myself. I always wanted to try digital medium format. Especially after falling in love with X-Pro2 another Fujifilm camera - with (almost) medium format sensor - was a no-brainer. I got GFX50R with GF 50mm/f3.5 lens. I take this camera with me ... EVERY DAY. It's very compact and relatively lightweight. In one word - it's very PORTABLE as for medium format camera. I love the details in the images. But to say that it blew me away - nehhh... not really. For some reason I preferred the look of my X-Pro2 (I guess you just can't beat the X-Trans sensor :) However I want to try my GFX50R with adapted lenses. I can't afford to buy another native Fuji GF glass. And I hope that I will be able to achieve that coveted "medium format look", particularly in environmental portraits. I've got a good collection of vintage lenses for 35mm film cameras (or as they say "full-frame"). I am still thinking about getting my hands on a used Hasselblad H3/4/5D with 40 or 50 mpx digital back. That true medium format CCD sensor always produced breathtaking images. One of my favourite Canadian photographers (of Ukrainian 🇺🇦 origin ;-) Edward Burtynsky worked a lot with this system. (Of course it's not about a camera - it's a photographer who creates the images. But the right tool also matters :) Kyle, THANK YOU for the inspiration you bring through your videos! I am your big fan ❤

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, Rostyk! Happy to hear that the original video inspired you to grab the 50R and that you've been happy with it. That camera with the 50mm is a very compact setup. I can understand the appeal of the older Hasselblad systems as well. I've looked at them many times. Big fan of Burtynsky's work as well!

[@VictorReynolds]

Great video Kyle. I shoot both film and digital. I'm glad to see you give a serious assessment of the GX50R compared to film.

[@andrewgifford7740]

Just following the tip re Edward Burtynsky's output - looks right up my sock, shall dive in!

[@davidgatchalian885]

Thanks as always for a thoughtful video. Have been following for awhile as part of my new journey into film…shooting 35mm with a Pentax MX and almost went 645 and almost 6x7…maybe when I’m ready. Appreciate how you are embracing both digital and film formats as I am finding each does have its own merits and advantages. Thanks Kyle..love the photos and the videos. Cheers !

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, David!

[@Crusader1089]

Some beautiful shots of the UK. I enjoyed the review, but I also really enjoyed those photos. Really captured the rustic, weathered, loveable decline of the British coastline.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@Gallery90]

To your comment about simplifying the digital post-processing -- totally agree. I've been working on a personal long term project that started with Fuji X-Trans APS-C and which is now morphing into using a GFX50S II. The output is all B&W and, liking what I saw in the Acros for shooting JPEGs, I'm taking RAW files and converting them to the Acros sim with NIK. From my film days I know what Acros is supposed to look like, and starting from that same point every time the adjustments I make are much more consistent and kinda keeps me on track. I've divested most of my film equipment (there were a few "moments" when the M6 and the XPan went away), which was mostly for "slow" photography. Working with the GFX, I like the look I'm getting with the lens focal lengths longer than APS-C, and and with the GFX files (and the 50MP files are just fine -- not even tempted to go with 100MP).

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, Larry. Yeah, I'm a big fan of the Acros sim from Fuji and almost always use it as a starting point for my BW work. There's many times where the images need little adjustment with that preset.

[@-brohdie]

Seeing that Heyden Motel and Mountain Ash Inn was kind of trippy, I just developed a few pics from there from when I passed through this summer. I like yours better! lol

[@KyleMcDougall]

Nice! I love that area and up along Superior for photography.

[@sarahdippity]

Just listened to your podcast with Fujilove! Great interview Kyle!! I love FUJI cams!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thanks, Sarah!

[@Beauty.and.FashionPhotographer]

WOW. Just incredible Volor Harmonies in your images... LOVE LOVE LOVE your work !

[@KyleMcDougall]

🙏 Thank you.

[@protestagain]

I have different formats of digital cameras, and the main format for me is the Micro Four Format, because of its size and the 4:3 ratio, and it performs very well. I have a lot of Nikon F optics from the old days, and because of that, I also have a Nikon Df, a Canon EOS 5D MkII, and many more digital cameras. But I'm also a Large format shooter, with a 4x5" camera with a 6x12 back, and the Mamiya 6MF and 7. All of my cameras are full frame. They cover the frame, but I'm looking at the GFX system, as a substitute for some kind of shooting, and therefore it's interesting to listen to you as a film shooter. By the way, my second camera was an Olympus OM2. I have a lot of feelings, shooting with that camera. Nowadays I have a OM3Ti, and lots of the best glasses from Zuiko. I might have the best of all systems, but I will die as an Olympus OM shooter. By that I mean I will always use film, and if I need a 6x6 or 6x7 or bigger, I always have a solution. But I'm also a 4:3 ratio shooter, and I will always be a m43 man, and sometimes there is more resolution needed. Yeah, I know all of that, but sometimes a GFX might be the perfect solution for me. I don't have the answers, but I search for the solution. Allways, and might find the final solutions for me. I don't care, maybe that's the answer.

[@gtkiller]

Your video helped me finally make a decision to jump into Fuji’s GFX system, thank you for creating an informative video.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Great to hear!

[@stevespeer5371]

Great video and very informative. I am picking up a used GXF R today to try out before I purchase.

[@mjmdiver1137]

I added a Hasselblad 501C into my kit this year after having used only digital for about 15 years or so. I missed the process that comes with making images on film... I also have the 50R and a handful of lenses and really enjoy shooting that camera. I also have the camera set up to shoot digital copy images from the negatives and chromes (I have a book project that I needed high quality 4x5 chromes reproduced) and so shooting the 6x6 negs will be easily accommodated now that I have that running effectively. While the digital is certainly the easier path to an image, I am happy to have added film back into my shooting. I believe it makes me slow down and consider my shots a bit more and it challenges me technically a lot more. That makes photography more enjoyable for me.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, Andrew!

[@dxps26]

A nice roundup of the GFX system's strengths and weaknesses. I am glad I was able to invest into the 50R and 50/3.5 when I got a chance. it's a HUGE step up from APS-C, but it's not so much a leap from 35mm sensors, and I don't think it's even fair to compare the two - I really think the true strength of the GFX system is the 4:3 aspect ratio that really changed the way I compose. I found with my X-PRO3 (another brilliant camera) I was really constrained by the 3:2 ratio, especially when shooting in portrait orientation. It is really a 'tight' frame and getting an enviromental portrait, a vertical landscape or general street photos with that tight framing really cuts out environmental context, background and makes the image a bit forced. The wider aspect ratio of 4:3 in portrait really lets the compostion 'breathe' and lets you more easily compose with your subject off-center. I find myself shooting in portrait orientation more than ever, and it's really changed the way I look at a compostion. I had the same feeling when I shot 6x6 medium format, and even more of the same with my Pentax67 - I think Olympus and the MFT system (also with a 4:3 ratio) are on to something and we've been stuck with this legacy 3:2 ratio for far too long - it is a compromise on so many fronts, including printing where you have to crop the image you carefully composed while shooting to fit 8x10 or 11x17 or any of the common sizes, losing resolution and adding work.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thank's for watching. As mentioned in the vid, I'm a huge fan of the 4:3 sensor, and it's one of my favourite aspect ratios to compose with.

[@giordanobruno7943]

i am using Mamyia 645 85 1.9 on the system for portraits and absolutely love it. its nowhere as clean as my 110 2.0 Gf but it gives a organic feel to it almost like film.

[@lukecollinsfilm]

Hey man, I rarely comment on videos but I have to say your work is incredible. Thank you for sharing

[@KyleMcDougall]

I appreciate that, Luke. Cheers.

[@messsucher]

In the past year I've been struggling to the exact same issue. What first draw me into shooting film is the process & experience, and this is still one major factor that's preventing me from going fully digital. I have a Canon EOSR, still gives me incredible photos even its 5 years old, but the experience is just too simple with all the auto modes; and the files are so clinical that it doesn't have the characters from what film offers. And I feel this is what you are saying as a certain particular film stock already has a basis and allows you to perfect it, whereas digital requires you to start clean everytime. I really love shooting with my leica m and mamiya rz. But after watching the videos you made with the GFX, it also did prompt me into thinking these film cameras gives me, is just the experience, unlike from the image quality/efficiency stand point, digital wins all the way. (Especially how manipulative they are to mimic the film looks) At the moment I am really looking at the 100s+mitakon combo, the shallow dof really also did remind me of the pentax 105mm, even makes me regret letting it go. And it too can perfectly replace my use of the Canon for scanning films. It just might be the ultimate "end". (until the next generation comes offcourse) Even tho that same money can get me thousands of film shots for years to come.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Yeah, I think there will always be subtleties between digital and film that can't be 100 percent matched. But you can get pretty damn close, and those subtleties really aren't going to matter in the grand scheme of things when it comes to an image being 'good' or not. At the end of the day, you need to choose what matters most to you-shooting experience, certain features, cost, etc.

[@messsucher]

@Adrian Kelley what looks good is always a subjective preference, there is no good or bad in that. The thing about digital, is that its so clinical, there is so many information at your disposal to manipulate, you can get it extremely close. At the end of the day its a medium to create your own work. Its the mind behind the camera that makes the photograph, not camera. (as much as I love the dozens of cameras that I bought) I also love the look of film. But if I still need to edit the last 10%. Then I really do doubt if film has its signiture look

[@brennanclody]

Never heard of the 65 1.4 until here. Have been using the p67 lenses adapted on my 50r and love them (especially the p67 fisheye), but that separation with the 65 will probably convince me to ruin my wallet this Christmas. Additionally - thank you for such a beautiful contemplation on the film vs digital dynamic and the love of process. Different tools for different satisfactions. Cheers mate!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thanks! Glad you enjoyed. And yeah, the 65 1.4 is a great lens if you're looking for that 105 feel.

[@deathrat]

What you did at 12:46 is pretty neat!

[@WickBeavers]

Not sure there’s a pro film photographer on this planet but I’m adding- this is great!

[@JS2Tango]

What a surprise to see photos from Snowdonia in this video!

[@brianwyse5810]

Thanks for that. I can remember i switched to 'digital' way back in 2005 and had exactly that issue in the 'editing' phase, where It just got a bit boring after a while. I'm just starting to teach compact film photography to highschool kids, and its great because you can see where the mistakes are to be corrected, but more importantly, explain them.

[@johnbarratt337]

Would love to see a video on the settings you use on the GFX 50R. Whether you dive into all the features or just shoot with it ‘out of the box’

[@KyleMcDougall]

Hey John, it's nothing too complicated. Mostly just a film sim for previewing, and shooting RAW + JPEG, often in a crop mode.

[@Pentax67]

The best system for film photographers. So happy with my 50S and GFX 100. Never tried 50R and 100s though. GFX 100 is a big step forward compared to GFX 50S and 50R. Fuji is the continuation for film photographers on RB67/Pentax 67 to shoot for "free".

[@juliettemansour]

I love my Pentax67 and it has been the gold standard for me. You've thrown some figurative bait in the water for me. I'm already a Fuji user. I also shoot 4x5 as well. Now the biggest obstacle is the lens investment. I have so many x-mount lenses. Worth considering though. Thanks for sharing!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Could be worth checking out some older 645 glass, especially from Pentax. A lot more affordable. Cheers!

[@tonizzzo]

Super nice video. I adapt the 85mm 1.4, 50mm 1.7 contax zeiss and Minolta Rokkor 1.4 on my gfx and they are 👌🏻

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers! Yeah, I've used the 50mm 1.7 a few times as well. Bit of vignetting, but otherwise great!

[@erichstocker8358]

I agree that the film process is a key to the enjoyment of film.

[@Brause_Market]

I had the leica summicron 50mm version 5 on the gfx50r and I couldn't believe the details I was getting with this. Ofc you don't get the whole 50MP with a full frame lens but I really loved everything on this combo with the 35mm mode.

[@Jim-BobWalton]

Beautiful images. I have an X-Pro1 - which I love - but the GFX50 would be very tempting …if I had the mullah. I also love film, but perhaps love the quirky and DIY nature of film cameras. Right now I’m looking to make at least one of my own, and can readily put something together. Perhaps also, the “perfect” digital images. Kyle takes care to create beautiful images, no matter what medium he uses, and other people will not be as careful, no matter their medium. But perhaps I like the imprecise tendency of analogue processes. The innate perfections.

[@samgao]

I always think of a sensor/film that is a larger format (either medium or large 4x5, 8/10) is that when you shoot for shallow DOF, imagine just 40% more around the corners and that's what you get with Medium Format. Sure, you can get like a canon 400 f/2.8 IS and stand way back and isolate a subject, but the geometry is compressed as opposed to shooting a person up close where their nose is out of focus, but their eyes are perfect. That's the "medium format/large format" look. It's like that video/motion film effect when you slow move in closer to someone while zooming your lens out to maintain the same distance. Objects get wrapped behind the subject! When I shot film, I chose the film I liked. When I shot digital, I have to create the look that I like.

[@feelda303]

you can achieve the same look with bokeh panorama (aka brenizer method) but it takes a little work

[@samgao]

@@feelda303 or you can do this with an iPhone as well, just stitch it together! Fuji also has a stitch mode! It’s such an incredible system, but it’s too slow for me…

[@timwatley4793]

Bought a 50r after 10 years of shooting film and I can't imagine ever going back.

[@henkhenk4357]

Film vs digital when you scan your film with a digital camera ? Should you not compare digital printouts with analog darkroom prints ?

[@nickolasmazzara127]

Really cool video! I think what Fuji has done with digital medium format has been truly astounding. I also really appreciate your stance on film v. video. It’s what is behind the camera that really matters!!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, Nickolas!

[@nanoulandia]

I have been watching a lot of your videos and they have been very useful. I am working on a photo project myself and slowly figuring out what works for me system-wise. I currently have a GFX50R and a Nikon ZF, which is great because I can adapt Nikon F lenses to both and make one camera a backup of the other. What I hate about the GFX though is how heavy the GF lenses are so now playing with adapting Pentax 645 A lenses (one of which may become my scanning lens; the 120mm f4). Of course, now that I am buying the lenses, I may as well get the Pentax camera too! Not sure how much I would gain vs. just having the GFX50R however but I used to shoot film way back when and love working in a more analog way. I am still trying to figure out this last bit as well as how to go about processing the negatives, so it's been great to learn from your experience (saved me a lot of time and $$!). Look forward to seeing more of your videos and photographs. Love both.

[@pockets8108]

I don’t like how it has virtually no hand grip, I would be a mess trying to hold this camera up and take pictures

[@truepaulesko]

I also transitioned from film to digital with Fuji. But I used the Fuji s3 pro. For colours and film like appearance, that camera IMO has still no rival.

[@AlOne-xg6dv]

Very balanced and poetic way to share your feelings with no fight between each other solution. Only nice and soft informations. Thank you.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thank you!

[@chrishipop5]

I think I was on the same trip. Trying to replicate film with my Xpro2, and it looked great, but it largely in my head i was comparing too much and you'd end up mad becz it wasn't film enough. So, what I've been seeing folks do is their own treatment. Shoot from RAW and do the work to make the magic. Presents can often feel like a cop out and leave you wanting more

[@brntgudn]

Hi Kyle, I would love if you did a deep dive into your environmental portrait process with the GFX system. From start to finish if possible. That lens you mentioned with the 1.4 is fascinating. It really does look like the pentax 67 105mm!

[@andrewgifford7740]

Yes, same. Nailing manual focus with 1.4 may take some doing! Nuff respect for that.

[@KyleMcDougall]

I'll keep that in mind for the future. Environmental portraits are something that I've only been doing for a couple years, and have a ton to learn still. Very much different than shooting landscapes. And yeah, the Mitakon is great!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Digital is great for that-being able to punch in while focusing. With the Pentax 67 I often use a tripod and the critical focusing accessory to help nail focus with the 105.

[@POWPLANET]

That's some very thorough thoughts you gave here, thanks for sharing them! As someone who also comes film to Fujifilm digital, I really hope you could share some of process or standard routines of how you edit your digital raws to achieve similar film look!

[@goorackerelite]

Man!! Thank you for your tremendous effort on this!!! I loved it

[@jasonbourne1981]

I can listen to him talk all day

[@shanillakhlani5331]

I'm looking at as close to possible digital replication of the Pentax 6x7, in particular with 105 for that sweet subject separation. Thinking about the GFX 50R and adapting the 105 to it...hmm. Great video, very informative making me think!!

[@emipls]

Your first video on the 50r helped convince me to buy it and it’s my favorite camera I’ve ever owned. It’s not perfect but the photos I can get out of it are fantastic.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Glad to hear that!

[@RedStarRogue]

So I'm considering buying a used GFX 50S and if I do I will also have to adapt my Pentax 645 lenses. Happy this video exists so I can see what I may be getting into.

[@Mousoukyou]

Beautiful photos! I love your style of shooting. Thank you for your opinions and information.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thank you. 🙏

[@gerekappo]

Great video brother. Film is getting expensive as F. and you are right, you need to find whatever works for your work. Saddly that sometimes means expending a lot of money tryng new things. I will keep shooting film, for sure, but never gonna abandon my digital camera, they teach me a lot, i cannot imagine how much money that will cost me learning on film.

[@RM.TokyoPhotographer]

the Fuji X mount 35mm F0.95 Zhongyi Optics Mitakon is also legendary....I wish I had the opportunity to shoot with the 65mm probably has that Magnificient look

[@nathanjohnson5304]

Very nice commentary and reasonable conclusions. Confirmed a lot of speculation I had about what making the jump to GFX might be like and I'm happy I jumped to 6x7 first.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, Nathan. Thanks for watching.

[@nathanjohnson5304]

So it’s a year later and with the release of the 100II, I managed to snag a 100S for $3565 shipped. Adapting Nikon and M645 glass and will pick up that 35-70 most likely too. Thanks for helping guide my choices with your detailed and thoughtful videos.

[@motodiaries8204]

While the idea of the ease of use of digital is appealing on some level, after shooting film for a few years, digital no longer feels like real photography to me. Digital is just too easy. I like the difficulty of working with old film cameras, worrying about getting the right exposure and developing the film well, and the satisfaction of handling negatives. The process is demanding and engaging in a way that digital can never be. Digital just feels like another computerized application like a smart phone. I don’t think I could ever go back.

[@joelgermain1988]

I have been on the fense for a long time actually. The gfx100s, the 50s ii.... or 907x (but pricey). After a few of your video, I'll go with a gfx50s ii. Thanks a lot Kyle for helping me in my choice.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Glad it helped. Cheers!

[@rhonaldjr]

The GFX system is very good for slow and intentional photographers such as myself. I have been using it since 2019 (GFX 50s, and then GFX 100s). The lenses are a league of their own.

[@patrickjclarke]

Did you ever consider the M11? Paired with a Noctilux you'll get that same DOF as that Mitikon, and a little more MP in a smaller body. The sensor size of the GFX does give a touch more tonal range and has a better pixel pitch, but it's definitely not the jump that 645 or 6x7 has and I don't know if it's all that noticeable between the M11 FF sensor and the GFX to the normal eye. I guess what I love most about the M (other than I'm a rangefinder person) is the overall size of the camera and the lenses...the GFX is just a beast. Not trying to harsh on your choice, but the beauty for me (M240) is that my 35mm film and my digital share the same amazing lenses, and the M240 can be toned to feel more filmic in post...then if I do want a boost, I'll go to my 645 or 6x7 and film. And if I'm feeling extra saucy I'll bring out the Sigma sd Quattro and the amazing glass it has and get that Foveon love.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Definitely an intriguing option, but I'm not a huge rangefinder fan, and at this point, wouldn't spend the money to invest in Leica glass and the digital system. I can understand the appeal though, especially if you already have bought into Leica glass and own an older film body.

[@patrickjclarke]

@@KyleMcDougall yeah, like I tell others, if you don't LOVE a rangefinder, don't get an M (digital or film), no matter what. You'll just be frustrated and the slap-on EVF and limited close-focus will piss you off. :P For landscape stuff (I don't do much) I really do like my Sigma sd Quattro with the amazing 18-35mm lens. The camera is built SO well, weatherproof, and those Foveon colors. My buddy has the GFX50R and the sd Quattro H and he thinks the Quattro is more "filmic". Will be fun to see your journey with the 50R!

[@borromine]

Nice. I’ve used Pentax 67, 645 and Arca 69. Loved them and miss them. I use Fuji gfx now 100S. I’d like a 100S that was identical to the original 50S controls. I went with the 100S for autofocus. And for file size when shooting 65::24 pano. The tilting eye piece on the 50S is a good send for copy work. I really have trouble understanding why we cannot have the eyepiece systems found on the Pentax 67, Pentax LX, Nikon F3,4,5. These were procameras that were working tools. The GFX 50S comes close but 50S II and 100S are a step away from being all around professional tools. Still, very great camera. The other reason to go digital is just cost. It is a LOT cheaper in the long run… Again, very good video. I use a lot of Pentax glass on gfx but sadly pixel peeping has caused me to shoot to GF mount. The 45-100 is particularly good and significantly better than the superb Pentax FA (645) 45-85. I was disappointed to see that but a fact is a fact. Lastly the canon 85mm f1.8 tho it vignettes a bit is every bit as good as the GF 80mm. Much cheaper than Mitakon and autofocuses with Fringer Pro ($$$) adapter. It’s very small and light too.

[@magiccarpetrider4594]

Damn, all the 40 yr pros here, I might as well chime in. Except I embraced digital decades ago. I’ve been using PhaseOne and Phase backs on Hasselblads and Leica M series. Haven’t even watched this yet, but after having Fuji XT2, I’m not thrilled. I’ve been trying to find an exciting body to adapt Zeiss ZE lenses to, but I don’t like the focal length conversions. At least the GFX has a metabones smart adapter.

[@TJ-po9ol]

I got IR pollution with my GFX 100s while shooting around sunset in the mountains. It was odd, the sensor is similar to the pocket cameras in this sense, at least that was my experience. I also got banding in the red channel on some sunset shots, I was shooting in 16bit raw files and never experienced this on sony or canon.

[@zvitkovits]

On a side note you mention the "downgrade" from the 100s to the 50r. This is one of the most interesting aspects. What led you to do this?

[@KyleMcDougall]

Hey Chris, mostly the price and the fact that the 50R does everything that I need it to for the work I create.

[@zvitkovits]

@@KyleMcDougall It's comforting that someone with such an important voice as you subordinates technological decisions to their photographic needs and discusses it publicly. It's of real benefit learning how and why you make technical decisions in order to realize your visions and ideas. Thank you.

[@michaelwoof823]

Yes, I could never not have a traditional film camera along side my digital work, the slow process of film is still a form of meditation for me.

[@sphaera3809]

I love my 50R! Such a versatile camera. It can get a little heavy with certain lenses… Vintage Mamiya 645 manual Sekor C lenses work well it. The 120mm f/4 macro works really well for negative digitalization.

[@KyleMcDougall]

The Pentax 120 has been amazing for scanning negatives as well. Just like the Mamiya, it's nice and affordable.

[@ModernVintageFilm]

I'd love to save up for one of these. I'd love to see the difference in med format

[@thefirstsipoftea7903]

Great video! Love my gfx, love shooting film. Have had very similar experiences.

[@Animatedron]

Have you ever tried using a film simulation like Really Nice Images? Would be really interesting to see how you thought they compared, to film, and your editing workflow.

[@jaegermah]

Awesome video. Love your 'to the point' delivery. Great vibe throughout. Thanks.

[@KyleMcDougall]

I appreciate that!

[@luisedtr07]

Man I’m really loving my 50R + Mitakon combo. Especially for portraits. Though I’m really considering the new Nikon ZF. Has anyone ever found a Mitakon same look alternative for full frame??

[@clifb.3521]

gorgeous shots in the 1st 3o secs!

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thanks a lot!

[@JAPB0169]

Magnificent video, thanks! Can I ask what the detail is like in the shadows? I have a Hassy H4d-40 and I never use it because of battery and shadow noise..

[@district5rookie]

Your photos are fantastic.

[@KyleMcDougall]

I appreciate that. Thank you.

[@Reno_T]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the system but most important stunning photography 🙌🏻

[@KyleMcDougall]

Thank you.

[@heres_the_sauce]

I can see myself getting one eventually to adapt my Mamiya lenses to. Hopefully the demand doesn’t cause the used prices on bodies to go up a lot.

[@256k_]

i feel like people are always saying film vs digital. why can't it be film & digital? why can';t we just use both and accept each one's strengths and weaknesses without picking sides? i shoot both film and digital depending on the occasion and in the end i express myself through photos equally.

[@KyleMcDougall]

I agree. And I think most people feel the same way.

[@seemtorecall78]

There’s something about the look of the images from that contax 45

[@BenRipleyPhoto]

Really interesting Kyle thank you. Good to see a balanced, non-emotive film/digital video! Sound conclusions. I shoot mostly digital now due to the cost of film but when I want to shoot film, much like you, nothing else will do (and that’s only 35mm). I too went round the houses on presets etc and came to a ‘radical’😮 conclusion… Because I don’t need to mix film and digital in the same body of work, a consistent look isn’t important to me. So I forego any and all presets now and accept, and enjoy, that my digital photographs look digital. They have a unique colour palette that I really like so I play to their strengths. Madness, I know. Anyway, thanks again and all the best.

[@willmccleland2383]

I have been battling with the idea for a while now but as you said in this video there is just something about the process of film that digital cant replicate. But that doesn’t mean one is better than the other its all about how you prefer working.

[@KyleMcDougall]

Cheers, Will. Yep, so many things that go into it other than just the final image. Enjoyment and process are a big one for me.