Rule 83: Temporal cum Clauses

[@linchpin1872]

I knew as soon as I saw the thumbnail that the comments would be gold lmao

[@latintutorial]

One more to go, too. 🙄

[@joenathan8059]

Now how does this pair with rule 34?

[@tylere.8436]

It pairs with that rule because of your immaturity.

[@joenathan8059]

@@tylere.8436 lol

[@LayingDragon]

not very much; the Temporal Cum Clause does not directly modify the Direct Object Accusative.

[@rajdhonsinghngangbam1848]

Its a joke, rule 34 is a rule of the internet saying that if something exists, there is adult content of it

[@clowkey1747]

Hahahae “cum” dixit. Mea culpa, sed ego risi

[@IdaeChop]

GOD THIS IS GOLD

[@wagnerprimodearaujo9972]

Obrigado

[@splashykoy11]

This should’ve been rule 34

[@spqr6291]

Ego sum primus!!!

[@MrGyges]

Struggling on …. But thanks

[@LucianBlox]

2nd! love the videos :)

[@fraternitas5117]

Septimus!

[@beeeb8831]

I don't understand the eorum in fulgentīs gladiōs hostium vidēbant Deciī cum in aciem eorum inruēbant. Eorum is masculine or neuter plural genitive , so of their. Should it somehow go with hostium?

[@latintutorial]

The eorum does refer to the enemies, but it is used as a pronoun in its clause. The fact that it and hostium are both genitive is just a coincidence of their use.

[@treetrunker573]

I've always pronounced it as coom. I just got jump scared

[@QueenMoontime]

❤❤❤

[@dariusclovis1374]

fulgentis gladios Shouldn't it read: fulgentes gladios

[@latintutorial]

The -īs ending for accusative plural, especially with participles, is relatively standard, especially in 1st century BC and earlier works. It's only later, and in modern textbooks, where the -īs changes to an -ēs.

[@dariusclovis1374]

Thank you for sharing.

[@ekathe85]

lol