Future Passive Participles (Gerundives)

[@viperking6573]

he is back

[@cornmono3665]

Been watching your videos for probably a few years now, but I’m finally teaching a Latin 100 class while I’m pursuing my Masters, so I’ll definitely be making use of these videos.

[@QueenMoontime]

Perfect timing, I just started on the gerundive and gerund!

[@latintutorial]

I know this won’t help you out now, but I have a Rules video on the gerund and gerundive coming out in a couple of weeks.

[@QueenMoontime]

@@latintutorial My exam isn't til November, I've got time haha

[@gtrboy518]

It's a bit tricky! I'm on Wheelock's Capvt. XXIII.

[@farhanaditya2647]

By far the clearest explanation of gerundives I've found. I can't thank you enough, really.

[@christophersmith_staff-gre5598]

Always glad to see a new video I can use with my students! These videos are always greatly appreciated and incredibly helpful.

[@ananxiouspanda]

I'm so glad to see you're back! I hope this school year goes well for you

[@latintutorial]

Hopefully better than last year! That was insanely busy and so overwhelming.

[@richardhurley4648]

A model of clarity. Thanks!

[@bezbezzebbyson788]

A plan of taking the city and a plan of the city that will be taken mean different things. But if the latin construction means the first then it's a property of the construction as a whole not of the gerundive meaning because there is an implied "taking": a plan of (taking) a city that will be taken. It's common in most languages for participle forms to have different constructions whose meanings are best memorized as whole without trying to make that a meaning of the participle. English passive is a common example.

[@zoemoncla1629]

IVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS ONE !!!!!!!!!!!

[@entirelyeconomics4960]

This video has led to me discovering my new favorite word in Latin. My name is Kris, and when I started leaning Latin a few years ago I wanted to know if my name meant anything in Latin. There is no Kris, but Cris with a C is a word, a verb stem, and it forms a gerundive as Crisandus, which amused me, as it highly vulgar

[@prototropo]

The explanations are very clear. Thanks! Idiotically, I never imagined that the names of grammatical constructions, like “gerund,” derive from actual words whose first-order meaning the derivations later referenced. In fact, the referent here becomes its own antecedent! Now I’m wondering whether that’s a linguistic meta-phenomenon or my own trivial discursive, reverse-engineered, epistemic recursion . . . where’s Wittgenstein the one time I sprout a seedling he might actually harvest?

[@commentfreely5443]

gerundIVE adjectIVE

[@franklinshouse8719]

Thanks for these videos! They are great!

[@simbelnubisudan6469]

Thanks for posting!

[@zADIA5025]

Glad to see you back. Quick question: at 5:58, is the epistulīs scrībendīs part in the ablative or dative form? And what would the name of this construction be? (e.g. dative of purpose, etc.)

[@latintutorial]

Idoneus takes a dative (and especially a dative gerund/gerundive phrase).

[@latintutorial]

I would call this use a dative with adjectives. Check out Rule 33: kzbin.info/www/bejne/any2aHycqK-KfK8.

[@zADIA5025]

@@latintutorial Thanks! :)

[@Tocaric2]

This guy's videos always feel like that no matter when you watch them they are always 7 years old.

[@harri5804]

a testament to how good and consistent his videos have been throughout the life of this channel :)

[@curtpiazza1688]

Great lesson! I like the -nd- and -ive- mnemonic trick!

[@ricardolichtler3195]

From Carmina Burana description: cantiones profanae cantoribus et choris cantandae. It's like a puzzle and I love it. :-)

[@GDitto]

You’re back!!!!

[@KingCrafter999]

Epic video

[@n.k.6801]

It basically acts like the verbal adjectives ending in -τέος in ancient greek. Carthago delenda est = Καταστρεπτέα εστίν η Καρχηδών

[@almazzagitov9799]

Speaking of participles, I wanted to ask about the following: I am aware of the fact that Latin didn’t have perfect active and present passive participles. The question is what they used instead? I am just new to Latin, would be glad if you help

[@latintutorial]

You could use a perfect participle of a deponent verb (e.g., locūtus, having spoken) as a perfect active, and in fact, many texts teach it in this way. But if you can't, you can always use a subordinate clause, like one introduced by qui (who, that) or dum (while).

[@marialuizamcdonough9723]

Thank you 🙂

[@VABJMJ]

Magister laudandus est mihi.

[@thorsmashkarts]

whats a periphrastic tho

[@HeliouHyios]

Latin loves its participles.... but compaired to greek its more like a platonic love not the crazy stuff you would find in greek texts^^

[@latintutorial]

Touché

[@georgelutu7196]

Waiting for rule number 76 to 90...substantive

[@latintutorial]

Coming. I will definitely get through Rule 80 by the end of 2021, then hopefully finish through Rule 91 by the end of May, 2022, if not sooner!

[@georgelutu7196]

@@latintutorial thank you for your videos

[@eduardoantunes7662]

7:15 And what about: DE ÓMNiBUS dubitándum EST ? ? ? DE ÓMNiBUS ... EST DE ... EST

[@cadetus2369]

Carthago delendam est