Future Active Participles

[@latintutorial]

Zahni, thanks! I use the Cambridge Latin Course in my own classroom, and Ecce Romani in an online class that I also teach.

[@fabiovinicius4766]

It reminds me english model verbs

[@pradeepsinghm]

Really appreciate this. I'm using Lingua Latina Per Se Illustrata and I couldn't wrap my head around this exactly, but this video solved it for me.

[@fabiovinicius4766]

There are some different concepts in latin which you can't understand just as intuitivelly, and need some more explanation outside

[@felipe.canever.fernandes]

Great explanation! I love how you show the periphrastic forms.

[@latintutorial]

Thanks!

[@colinmagnier1232]

@@latintutorial quick question if you have the time. Why was stage in Dative plural? Futuris scaenis..

[@thatguyfromthere1168]

In my opinion,you deserve more subscribers. Also,which languages do you speak?

[@latintutorial]

Thanks, and spread the word. I'm at the mercy of KZbin, of course... I used to be capable in French and German, with an understanding of ancient Greek grammar, but time has a way of chipping away at once solid foundations.

[@ehonda7831]

Why shouldn't we translate it as "will" or "shall" ?

[@thomasbartholomew4993]

Who else has an exam tmr?

[@xolang]

İ've just discovered this from kzbin.info/www/bejne/n3uyc2droNiWnqM . Makes İ wonder if there's any other modern spoken language with this form. Anyway, thank you very much for the video! -Colonia, August 2023.

[@zahniblumenthal-macfarlane]

Thank you so much for your videos! I'm doing Latin at university and have found your content a great way of revising. Out of interest what text books do you use in your own class room?

[@domwalkerpsc1]

Impressive video, as always! Just out of curiosity, what software do you use to make your videos?

[@latintutorial]

I use a combination of Garageband and Motion for the audio and visuals, respectively.

[@domwalkerpsc1]

It's really impressive!

[@joaogoncalves-tz2uj]

I will revisit this one million times

[@basvandeven1837]

What about "mansurus fueram" and "mansurus fuero"? Are you likely to encounter a future participle with a plusquam perfect or future exactum tense?

[@latintutorial]

Not likely, but the grammars (e.g., Allen and Greenough) do give it as a possibility.

[@SunnyBlue77]

would the Romans also have said " I would like to" instead of " I want to " ? thank you for all your great videos! for all the work!

[@legaleagle46]

They would have said it using the subjunctive forms of volo, since Latin did not have a conditional mood/tense (that form developed later as Vulgar Latin became the various Romance languages). "I would like to" would therefor be "velim," and I would have liked to" would be "voluissem."

[@legaleagle46]

They would have used the Imperfect Subjunctive "vellem" for "I would like to" and the Pluperfect Subjunctive"voluissem" for "I would have liked to. Latin didn't have conditional tenses, which is what "I would like" and "I would have liked to" really are. Those didn't develop until after Vulgar Latin started becoming the Romance languages.

[@goncasal4341]

Very helpful ,THANK YOU so much

[@franklinshouse8719]

Thanks for these videos! They are great!

[@roberthillier80]

Thanks for a good explanation.

[@curtpiazza1688]

Excellent explanation!

[@VerreButterfly]

5:55 & 6:01; what is "esses" and "sis"? Are they forms of sum, esse in a different mood/voice from the present Active indicative?

[@latintutorial]

+Danielle Ong They are subjunctive forms of sum, esse.

[@latintutorial]

+barbar rambo They are subjunctive forms of sum, esse.

[@VerreButterfly]

+latintutorial thank you so much yes I just learnt the subjunctive mood a few weeks back :P

[@dylanrwestland]

You're amazing

[@MrViki60]

nice

[@Magwamagwa]

I do hate how american Latin's case table is different to English. For those who care; we use nominative, vocative, accusative, genitive, dative, genitive and ablative. I think our way is much better.

[@Magwamagwa]

+Aibohphobe but in terms of learning, the English system presents better patters to learn

[@Magwamagwa]

+Aibohphobe yes indeed, locatative and vocative are both somewhat redundant and archaic but I feel we ought to preserve them simply to expose linguists to their ideas and to allow them to have a more thorough understanding of languages as a whole

[@Magwamagwa]

As I see it, Latin should be a very pure example of a language as it is in effect, grounded and does not develop any more thus an excellent example for any linguist to draw connections between, ergo by preserving the archaic ways we allow Latin to be more functional in the modern world without changing its grammar