Is Trump's Crime WORSE Than Biden's?

[@LawByMike]

What do you think of this series? Any comments or suggestions (good or bad)? *Would you prefer we only spoke about one story?* Comment below 👇

[@LennyQUMFIF]

I love how the video starts like a news report with the music! Pretty cool.

[@billaAAAaaaaaA]

Isn’t this going against the law on trumps side??? Privilege

[@majiknoah9161]

Love these way more than shorts. Keep it up Law by Mike

[@fredashay]

What about Biden having boxes of documents? Hunter Biden's laptop collusion with Russia? Hillary's emails? And all the other alleged crimes committed by Biden, the Clintons, Obama, Pelosi, Fauci, and others? Why are they only going after Trump for his alleged crimes when all the Democrats' alleged crimes are even worse?

[@Brnergulsen1713]

Good, you’re the best

[@justyourfriendlyneighborho903]

I like how objective and unbiased these are, he genuinely looks at both sides of the argument. I guess that's necessary in his profession though.

[@michael567jober]

except when you represent your client you should definitely be biased in their favor. at least i’d hope so lol

[@creative0001]

@@michael567jober Playing devil's advocate is also important

[@TheBluePhoenix008]

That's what laywers do!

[@justyourfriendlyneighborho903]

@@michael567jober When actually arguing for his client, he would obviously have to argue for his side. But lawyers have to fully understand both sides of the case and consider arguments that could be made against them and how to counteract them. Although yes, obviously in the courtroom the lawyer would be making arguments for one side and not saying anything that would hurt their client's case.

[@michael567jober]

@@justyourfriendlyneighborho903 well said

[@mbryson2899]

Those adoptive "parents" are scum, pure scum. If you take kids in you do it for their benefit, not to pimp them out. Utterly disgusting! My better half and I took in two kids because THEY needed a family to care about them. We never got nickel one, that wasn't ever the important part.

[@MeppyMan]

Their lack of self awareness is both sad and unsurprising.

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

This is my entire take on adoption if I ever want to have any sort of children. I want to give kids a good home out of the kindness in my heart, not to exploit them. The people who do that are legit sociopaths

[@td9250]

Dude just walked over and cut the trees as if he couldn't call the authorities to asses the situation? He destroyed something that took a decade to develop and caused permanent damage to this person's property and caused avoidable stress. Add trespass and vigilante to the list.

[@CheesyintheHead]

100+ year old trees

[@goodman854]

lmao. I love law by mike. He's WAY more unbiased then some Lawyer channels I've watched. That is RARE these days. A1

[@RandomRothbardian]

Indeed, mike unlike most lawyers on KZbin is mostly unbiased (I know he must have some bias I have not seen any yet though)

[@RandomRothbardian]

@@BthIX no he isn’t he is heavily biased towards the political left

[@BthIX]

No, his classified documents segment was extremely biased. 1. Failure to mention that Trump was on tape saying "I could have declassified this document but I didn't" destroying the defense that the president declassified everything at Mar A Lago 2. Citing Elon Musk's opinion as an expert take 😂 3. Leaving out that Mike Pence had classified documents too which falsely paints the picture that only democrats are getting off easy 4. Framing Trump being gone after because he "wasn't polite" when the reality is by refusing to comply with the requests to turn over all the classified documents like Pence and Biden did he was obstructing justice, the documents Trump had were a higher classification, they were left in much more careless places like the bathroom, and Trump was caught on tape actually showing people the classified documents unlike Biden Mike either didn't read the indictment or purposely left out all this information to make Trump look better, and idk which is worse To be clear im perfectly okay with throwing the book at Biden, Pence and Hillary for their handling of classified materials but it's an objective fact that Trump broke more laws in his mishandling and its not even comparable

[@Smile200-z4y]

This is trump we're talking about though who has been in legal trouble for decades and lies about everything and gets away with it. I think its fair that he being targeted way more than other politicians. I still want politicians to go to jail but Trump deserves it more than any other politican. Also knowing this background it's easy to see why people against him are less forgiving of his mistakes versus Biden or Ted Cruz.

[@froggycolouring]

4 ghost replies?this comment section is haunted 💀

[@LockelyFox]

An important note: While copyright law does not affect game mechanics, gameplay *systems* (not the hardware, but specific unique features) can be patented. It's why we didn't have minigames on loading screens when load times used to be horrendous, because Namco-Bandai held a 20-year patent on it until 2015!

[@Lifty83]

True. Warner brothers patented the “nemesis system” in their middle earth games and Nintendo patented the building mechanics in tears of the kingdom.

[@lone_wolf106]

Some kids are starting to sue their parents for posting photos and videos of them online.

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

Yeah and it's entirely fair. Most post very disturbing photos, like photos of their naked underage children when there's tons of predators online, and that's why they're being sued. Most social media parents exploit their children for views and don't care if they get traumatized by it, because people can and likely have stalked those who were posted online by their parents

[@Leosloth2011]

In my opinion the only legal photos online are baby pictures

[@kathleenmccrory9883]

Full-grown trees are very expensive, so depending on how many and what kind they were, 600k might not be excessive. That's a bad neighbor..lol.

[@GrumpyOldFart2]

Yeah. Half the time when my two fave Reddit narrators pull a story from r/legaladvice, it’s TREE LAW. (Capitalizing because before they start reading the story, they chant TREE LAW! TREE LAW!! 😂

[@kathleenmccrory9883]

😂

[@junior523]

​@@GrumpyOldFart2what's tree law?

[@GrumpyOldFart2]

@@junior523 Exactly as it sounds. It’s laws (USA) regarding the disposition of trees on your property. If you intentionally cut down trees on someone else’s property, there’s a whole host of crap that can come down on you.

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

​@@GrumpyOldFart2TREE LAW TREE LAW!!!!

[@JohnMarston1876]

Thanks for being non-political and showing both sides

[@markschulte-b4f]

When you pretend both sides being presented are equally worthy of merit , you set up what's known as a false equivalency, which is a very political thing to do. Trump has been on a public and obvious crime spree for decades. He's a mob boss . Ignoring those concepts and/or claiming The Biden administration is equally guilty of similar crimes is ridiculous and anybody with a functioning brain knows this. False equivalency

[@justyourfriendlyneighborho903]

That's what I love about these videos, I guess it's second nature to a lawyer to understand both sides of the argument. Even if I don't agree with one side, it's important to understand where someone's position comes from.

[@TheBluePhoenix008]

Tree laws are pretty strict from what some reddit stories tell. I remember there being some prorevenge stories about some neighbor running over some trees and it cost him a million dollars because trees are apparently very valuable.

[@AlexDoerflinger]

I feel like in this country it feels like your proven guilty til your proven innocent but a lot of people are guilty

[@handlethisnut]

Ever heard of the Court of public opinion? Obvious explanation

[@Blitzkers99]

Trump is proven innocent

[@joshuaadams6565]

So the person that is accusing someone of doing a crime is innocent of lying until proven guilty too? Both sides can’t be innocent or guilty and therefore it’s unrealistic.

[@cailemkostiuk377]

There have been cases of video making it seem like one side did something wrong while courts take time. Like when three cops knelt on someone’s neck for at least twice as long as it takes to kill someone. But then there was that kid who went to BLM riots to shoot people. The video footage made him look innocent, it was his social media that suggested his only reason for going was to kill that made people think he was guilty.

[@tammiehinkle2040]

😢

[@OliveDasi]

I have probably the stupidest question regarding the Trump trial. If the documents had extremely high clearance and they will likely need to speak about what is in them, will the judge and lawyers need to at least have some clearance as well? I know then the obvious answer is "What about the jury?" That's where many of my questions are coming from. Given the sensitivity of the information case & the clearance most of it has, what role will that play in it?

[@ssgoko88]

I'm not a lawyer but in similar cases it is up to some random military guy to make the call. Sometimes the judge will have eyes on it, sometimes not. In this case it's not relevant. The content of the documents is not important, only what kind of classified the documents are. So in trumps case it will probably not be read by judge or jurors.

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

Usually they would call someone who has the clearance and tell basically what's in it with some quotes if needed

[@alexdhall]

Judge doesn't need a security clearance. Trump's lawyers will have to get clearances ASAP. The process of including classified documents is based on the CLASSIFIED INFORMATION PROCEDURES ACT (CIPA). Jury doesn't need security clearances because the documents will be distilled down into the least sensitive form that gives the jury the gist. This process is based on CIPA. Places like Lawfare get into that better than can be described in a KZbin comment.

[@jamesshriver4822]

@@lovelysakurapetalsytYea, hope they have to call Trump himself 😂😅

[@Loudnose]

The video started as some kind of News report 😂

[@LawByMike]

you like that?

[@Aromatic.Bleach]

​@@LawByMikePersonally, I found it amusing and entertaining.

[@stanky5187]

​@LawByMike it was also funny how abruptly it ended 😂😂

[@AnnabethOwl]

I have a tree story with our neighbors… we moved into this house about 8 years ago and when we first moved in their were two dead trees in front of our house that had very clearly been dead for a long time. My dad is worried Because If the fall in the wrong direction they will land on our house. Unfortunately he found out that the majority of the trees are on our neighbors property(we only have a few inches on our side) it’s important to not that we have a shared drive way that we share with 3 other people(kinda like a culdasac with one driveway) my dad spent 7 years trimming all the branches that were on our property as well as contacting the neighbor asking him to remove the trees but he did nothing, even though all his neighbors were asking about the trees. Then their was a thunderstorm and the trees fell over to our neighbors house, because we weighted them that way. They were luck the trees got caught on another tree otherwise it would have smashed their house. Then we had people knock on our door asking about the trees and we kept having to say “they aren’t on our property we can’t do anything” 3 days after the fell over they were removed. Was their any legal thing we could do to remove them sooner.

[@solidmoon8266]

You would need to have called the township and request the them to assess the trees and have the trees deemed a safety hazard. Which would force the neighbor to have them removed promptly to not face fines, or be handed a bill from the city/town after they do it themselves. After that, all you gotta do is hope, like in your case, that the trees don't fall on to your property and damage anything.

[@justyourfriendlyneighborho903]

I guess cutting down those trees was pretty shameless I'll see myself out

[@LawByMike]

😂

[@YODALOVESTACOS]

Thanks for both sides, Mike. Lock em all up 🤣

[@nickkane8270]

@6:14 copyright law does not protect gameplay mechanics! This could mean a big deal for wizards of the Coast and D&D. They recently had third parties legally worried about content creation, as well as streamers. Leading some to want to create their own systems, yet if they could create an open source system with a different name that had the same gameplay mechanics…

[@abeclark524]

IDK Mike, as person who loves trees, I get rather passionate about tree crime. $600,000 seems about right for what Macy did. If you destroy someone's 200 yr old Oak, get ready for some major rage. That tree is literally irreplaceable.

[@mrbunnny]

“Even Elon” implies Musk has a perspective that differs from the average conservative perspective which is foolish

[@alansun697]

Yeah no one should get their opinions from Elon 😂 he just says basic things and people praise him like Jesus

[@RandomGamerCory]

elon is liberal literally the only thing elon was right leaning on was free speech until the adl paid twitter a visit and now hes just as censor happy, then again every conservative bows to isreal so maybe still right leaning on that

[@jadapinkett1656]

Elon is definitely different from the average conservative American.

[@cerebrumexcrement]

@@jadapinkett1656 well, first of all, he's not american.

[@rumblerider89]

I'll admit, I was nervous to watch this, I feared that I would see LBM go the way of the clear bias that Legal Eagle went, I am glad to see unbiased reporting.

[@inspector5122]

Same

[@Aleks_Khaos]

nahhh mike come one, i wanted the last clap before the video ended😭 btw great content, u r so up with the times and still have the formality of an adult, i hope when i get sued, i can hire u as my lawyer

[@LawByMike]

haha that clap will be for next week's episode 😉

[@Aleks_Khaos]

@@LawByMike yey :D

[@MysteriousPerson1447]

​@@LawByMikeI have a good idea. Would you like to hear it.

[@sherIfpawz]

“guys i think we partied a bit too hard”

[@kayntrain]

Very informative. Nice work

[@LawByMike]

Glad you liked it

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

Depending on the maturity and type of pine the trees were, that could be the majority of the 600k. Plenty of trees, especially if very old, cost a LOT of money

[@NullaNulla]

Might loose confidence ... nah man most people in ALL 5 eyes have LONG lost all confidence in the government and law enforcement!

[@United_Wings]

Wow 😮

[@Blubeans513]

Trump out here catching charges like it’s pokemon 😂

[@lesliescottw]

trump not going to be charged lol 2024

[@MegaCreeperboss]

Proper reporting

[@Bubblegum-pk3yn]

Wants politicians charged so he can charge them $1000 an hour 😂😂

[@jameswhitley4101]

We get something that looks kind of like justice in Washington _and_ he gets a great payday-- everybody wins!

[@rylencason4420]

Innocent until PROVEN guilty. 🇺🇸

[@acex222]

What is the point in posting this?

[@rainbow0027]

​@@acex222to uphold justice.

[@rylencason4420]

@@acex222 Because people assume guilt when the Constitution says otherwise.

[@Soul-g6x]

@acex222 whats the point in. Commenting this

[@Soul-g6x]

@@acex222.

[@currentfaves65]

TMZ better be looking over their shoulder. LBM be crushing it !

[@edgarmartinez8527]

I really enjoy your videos !

[@lt35phila]

Didn't the big guy receive 10% per hunter's laptop? Didn't the fbi and the justice department have the laptop for 4 years? What crime is the fbi and justice department committing by NOT pursuing a case?

[@sophiophile]

I have seen 'claims' about him recieving anywhere between a couple percent to almost half of the Burisma money, always attributed to the laptop. When I look for the actual source material for these claims, all I find are dick and drug paraphernalia pics/vids (I'm not being facetious, that's literally the most incriminating thing that ever shows up)

[@lt35phila]

@sophiophile correct but where is the investigation? Where?

[@markgoggin2014]

That’s because there is nothing incriminating on it.

[@larrytornetta9764]

@@markgoggin2014 how do you know? Can you post a link where the fbi or justice department say so?

[@markgoggin2014]

@@larrytornetta9764 the fact that after examining it, they did and said nothing is the proof. If there had been something there would have been at least an internal memo that the house oversight committee would have gotten ahold of and been parading around conservative media by now. Also, I don’t get the obsession with Hunter Biden. He is a private citizen. When George Bush Jr’s daughter got a DUI it didn’t effect him being president did it?

[@eazy_hub2804]

Law by Mike talked about trumps case more professionally. Much respect.

[@_CRINGE]

I love your vids man

[@Bongbongo]

I kinda like this series, unbiased and shows both sides.

[@jillb3072]

I’ve read many stories on Reddit, that people got sued for cutting neighbour’s old trees that were healthy and had to pay for them, it’s been called on Reddit as the “tree tax”

[@spikes1529]

FYI trees are expensive if they are old. If they need to be replaced in kind a 40' tall tree is a lot of money, i bet at least 50-100k each.

[@happypotatoq]

And thats the proper tv news that we need!

[@dizzy_jump]

this was super unbiased and well done you earned a sub

[@emgodas]

Law by Mike i would like to hear you explaining music business contracts and why or how they work etc.

[@galaxyofequestria]

Actually some tree can be cost a lot if they are endangered species or rare type of tree are to grown in area them sur for $600k is fine , if tree are fall in those category

[@sonicmeerkat]

the tree cost is hella high, though my guess is they want a speedy resolution so being able to definitely convict for tresspassing is a way to pressure them to settle for the actual amount they wanna win.

[@theevinousmr.m9216]

Law By Mike, what about Tree Law?

[@GrumpyOldFart2]

I’m thinking maybe he doesn’t know about it? When KZbin Reddit narrators pull a story about cutting down trees, you can practically hear through your phone the listening KZbinrs chanting TREE LAW, TREE LAW!!!!!😂

[@peskysmurf7414]

mikes transitions are so cool

[@Robbie_mcclung]

If my neighbors cut down my trees I’d thank them lol

[@ceneblock]

Was there anything missing? It feels like the video just cut off.

[@Decaycrazz]

Dude tree law is extremely costly from what I’ve heard, I’m surprised it wasn’t moee

[@jparkerj20]

The editing style looks as if Mike should be really biased towards a certain side. Man, was I wrong. Appreciate the objectivity and very carefully worded sentences.

[@Aromatic.Bleach]

Can you elaborate?

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

??? What are you even saying??

[@EndermanBrandon]

Hello Mike!

[@orbgyaj]

trees can bee pretty expensive 🤷‍♂

[@brianmiami]

Mike I have a question about one of your videos about copyright . So, can they sue if you use one of those face swap apps. Swapping the content with your face?

[@ThePsycho-j6m]

6:57 Mike are you ok😢

[@currentfaves65]

Trees make or break the feel of the home. Should be a criminal charge.

[@TheRacine11]

Can you do something about that titanic submarine I wanna know if the families can sue Ocean gate

[@Garibaldi.]

Mike is the GOAT

[@horn_hero]

Don’t duck with tree law Edit: $600k in a tree related case is normal if a bit low

[@warrenpeace9221]

What if you spent 15 years growing those trees. I'd be hurt for wasting 15 years of my life

[@Whoknowsanymore-s7g]

Probably Lil Nas X most celebrities I’ve heard of the winning these kind of things

[@jacoblee6586]

Don’t forget that one

[@QuinnA-fi8oi]

the copyright capybara is eatin' good tonight!!!

[@Jacfar242]

Hhh bro this guy is so funny 😂

[@hannamariewilson]

Treble damages for trees

[@idk_whatmynameis]

"Lock 'em all up!" based fr

[@RealOpiumBird]

bros the best news channel

[@rilla64]

I looked at this asking for what laws he's broke. Of course, I can't see any answer once again.

[@FrenchFried-b9z]

OK we don’t have enough trees in this world. I think he should fight for those trees.

[@robobuzzer]

Emotional damage: Law edition

[@StaggerjAGGER]

Maybe I'm wrong about this, but I've heard that Tree Law is very lucrative. Destroying someone's tree, is far more expensive than anyone would expect.

[@generaltim494]

Until he had a judge he put in power tossed case out without trial (how we gonna find out if he gave info away or not now )

[@pinoy32123ify]

it depends on the type of tree and their age. a tree can cost 200k each

[@bsperoz]

2:55 HEY! I RECOGNIZE THAT...Video maker. (I mostly watch his Facebook shorts lol)

[@artsyvids2563]

if saul goodmaan had a youtube channel itd probably be just like this

[@bobbierobinson6269]

Macy played Frank too long😂

[@mrswimmytanker7422]

I feel the party people are liable for the damages that followed. If your going to party or do anything on another property you must do so with due care and in reguard to limiting the risk to property

[@Mag3.1415]

*”lock all of the politicians up”* yep, smart

[@SEKTORMYNE]

A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down, but what happens if the medicine is Metformin?

[@kyleball8068]

If you cut my trees down I’m suing you for as much as I possibly can.

[@horn_hero]

Omg a lawsuit with upper deck? This outta be good

[@murti0077]

@lawbymike i orderd somthing and on the app it said between 2:15 and 4:45 it will be deliverd but its 7 today and i still got no updated

[@titansniper]

Can you speak about expungements? Talk about what crimes can be expunged. Which crimes are not permitted to be expunged and how it works for good people who want a second lease on life after they have moved on and stopped making legal mistakes

[@Obi-WanKannabis]

lock em all up lmao, instant sub

[@jacoblee6586]

And trespassing

[@Soul-g6x]

2024 is not speedy

[@jesus92952]

To me Mike is like the real life saul Goodman

[@blackfalcon1324]

as far as the trees, yea that's alot of money, but when you are dealing with rich people it will always be about alot of money

[@sharklord596]

I feel so great knowing how objective these comments are

[@VulcanOnWheels]

2:54 I could have gone without that man shouting.

[@DeadChannelNow]

Even off the camera the man is still Frank

[@HyDragon-]

I’m not gonna be annoying and say first so great vid!😊😊

[@coreyfaulkner1115]

You are 1000 PERCENT better than LegalEagle. He is just a biased left-wing mouthpiece. You, whether you like Trump or not, are very centered and did an amazing job presenting the Trump case. Suck it LegalEagle…Mike is king of this town. You rock!!!

[@handlethisnut]

Mike tiptoes around political issues to keep truth-sensitive types like yourself from losing your cool.

[@Eyedunno]

Lemme guess, you also didn't read the indictment, and you never will. I read it the day before LegalEagle uploaded his video and can say definitively that he went over it and summarized the information fairly and accurately. But ya know what? It doesn't even matter if you read it. Unless the judge suppresses evidence, the jury is going to see and hear the evidence that you choose to ignore the indictment's summary of. So stick your fingers in your ears all you like; it doesn't affect the actual evidence the DoJ has that the jury will actually be hearing.

[@coreyfaulkner1115]

The fact that you think indictment=proof shows your political immaturity

[@Eyedunno]

@@coreyfaulkner1115 I didn't say the indictment is proof. It does show the charges and the evidence they will be presenting against him in court in support of those charges though, and good luck to Donald on that, lol. Let's just say I bet his lawyers wish he'd keep his goddamn mouth shut already. You're absolutely right about my "political immaturity" though. I'm still naive enough to value reason and evidence over schoolyard taunts. Can you imagine? One day I may see the error of my ways though, and on that day I will understand the wisdom and poetic genius of Crooked Hillary/Lyin' Ted/Crazy Bernie/Sleepy Joe/Little Marco/ Ron deSanctimonious/Low-Energy Jeb/Coco Chow/Pocahontas.

[@Estarfigam]

I'm with you Mike lock them all up and let the Supreme Court sort it out.

[@shevthegreb757]

Ah yes the Supreme Court, which is also as corrupt as the politicians

[@YourMomsSpecial69Friend]

Start with Trump.

[@AdamLop314]

If it wasn't a speedy trial you're saying that we wouldn't see the trial until the year 2033?

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

If it wasn't a speedy trial then he would probably try to say his right to one is violated, I think that was the point he was making. Either around 2024 or it'll be thrown out

[@collinsnider4179]

What is Lorcana?

[@DiosDeGatos]

Technoblade never dies🕊👑❤

[@johnm5928]

The president is not bound by classification rules. They exist to serve the president. Recall that Obama literally spoke classified information at a press briefing once (that actually lead to legitimate harm being done) but no one is screaming for his indictment and he was perfectly within his rights as chief executive to do what he wants with defense info. Same goes for Trump. The charges are political and ridiculous.

[@Eyedunno]

You didn't read the indictment. One piece of evidence is a recorded conversation in 2021 between Donald, a writer, and a publisher, with two staffers also present. He very clearly says that one of the documents is still secret and he says "See, as president I could have declassified it. Now I can't, you know, but this is still a secret." If you're expecting Donald to use the argument that he was still president in 2021, good luck with that.

[@markschulte-b4f]

Trump is not the president. He's a private citizen, and he's guilty of huge crimes against the United States. Espionage is super serious, Jack Smith is a totally credible investigator and prosecutor. All the investigations had a grand jury sanction them. Trump and his associates are fighting to stay out of prison. Use your head!!

[@blakehansen8997]

@johnm5928 the problem is Obama spoke them while in office. Trump kept the documents. He has possession of way more classified documents and he is on video showing them to people

[@johnm5928]

@@blakehansen8997 yes but he is able to do that. It is within the purview of the president to declassify documents, though in his personal actions declassification isn't even needed. He retained those documents while he was still in office. It's a non issue made into an issue for political purposes. Literally every president has kept classified documents. And apparently most vice presidents. Cite a source where he was on video showing someone classified documents.

[@lovelysakurapetalsyt]

​​​@@johnm5928Just because they have doesn't mean it's okay. Getting one case down, the easiest case they can nail at that, sets a precedent and makes it easier to prosecute anyone else who does similar. It's too difficult to do it to an acting president, and who do we have that actively admitted he knew they weren't declassified on tape which is easy evidence? Just so happens to be Trump. The thing is we don't have the source yet as we don't have access to the case details yet, but we have multiple people attesting to the fact that he did in fact say it, so it's highly likely

[@Craigalicioususa]

You just missed 1 detail on the comparison of Biden to Trump Document case. Trump was president with the ability to declassify, Biden's documents were from his time as senator and VP, with no ability to declassify. I just found and like your channel, I do commend you for giving just details, you are good at keeping your opinion out from just facts and details. I only wanted to point out that one important detail.

[@SandraJackson-bs7bk]

I didn't know that

[@scenepunk09]

I mean if they were trying to adopt half of a child instead of a whole one that would be even more worrisome

[@livingglowstick1337]

we pretty much know becuase we have transcrips of him showing the documents saying there clasified and that he shouldnt have them or show tthem to people, we also have them for him telling people to hide the documents we had maids transporting them and going through them we already have so much information hes guilty

[@nrjkyu3994]

So bidens guilty too right? They aren't going after Biden who had over 1000 classified documents so clearly if he's innocent Trump is too

[@lesliescottw]

lol