I prefer book Legolas for his complexity, but Orland Bloom did a really good job playing an elf who maybe didn't know much of the world despite his many years of living, as if he hadn't much left the forest or dealt with mortals. I remember at one point rewatching LotR for who knows how many times and seeing the scene after Gandalf died and the way he looked almost confused, as he doesn't quite know what to feel or how to react, how he even when he was told to get the Hobbits up, he doesn't seem to force them up, taking Pippin's arm, but giving him time to put himself up, and I remember thinking to myself that he looks like he doesn't fully understand the concept of mortal grief, he doesn't understand what to do and how to feel about losing Gandalf, and I thought that was really well done for someone who's screen time doesn't exceed even a full hour over all three extended editions
@Jess_of_the_Shire11 ай бұрын
That's one of my favorite moments for his movie-character!
@Kai-Xi11 ай бұрын
background acting is kinda like editing in that, when it's bad, it draws attention to itself, but when it's good, it just helps you focus on the narrative
@danielmcbriel119211 ай бұрын
Where is Legolas a complex character in the books? I can definitely understand why the movie Frodo can't remember his name at the end.
@IsaacKuo11 ай бұрын
I think that Orlando Bloom did a really good job of looking almost confused because Peter Jackson mostly didn't give him any direction at all when he wasn't the focus of attention (which was, let's face it, most of his screen time by far). Basically, most of the time Orlando Bloom doesn't really know what's going on (on set) and so he's kinda doing his own thing just trying to look like he's focused on ... something ... most of the time. It kinda sucks that most of movie Legolas is just sort of an accident of Orlando Bloom working without context, rather than crafted by deliberate direction, but it DOES make him feel weirdly distant and alien compared to the more "human" characters.
@ProgressIsTheOnlyEvolution11 ай бұрын
I agree with everything you said here, movies tend to loose a bit more than books when it comes to supporting characters, which a book has more time to give debt to, than a movie where it is very hard to go too far into anyone but the main characters. I loved Legolas in the books, and it is of no fault to Orlando Bloom that I think less of the movie Legolas, there just isn't the time to delve too deep into his character, and as pointed out he barely says anything in the series.
@allisongliot11 ай бұрын
I love how intentional Tolkien was about writing ancient characters, and how even though the elves are so old they retain a sense of playfulness. The more mature we are, the more we see the importance of joy and play.
@Dowlphin9 ай бұрын
If by maturity you mean not being motivated by fear, as I roughly define it. Young children have a nature of appreciation for joy and play, too.
@marocat47499 ай бұрын
I wonder if he took that from lewis XD who coined that famous quote.
@Strideo111 ай бұрын
The singing was really nice. It's always hard to imagine how songs go when reading a book but now I know how I'll imagine this song from now on.
@chables7411 ай бұрын
I always enjoy it when Jess sings
@willemvandebeek11 ай бұрын
hear hear
@MistbornPrincess11 ай бұрын
I think she needs to make a folk album!
@obadijahparks11 ай бұрын
I have an old nursery rhyme book. There's an old song about the storm King in there, but no musical notes. So.. I instantly came up with a melody.
@Jess_of_the_Shire11 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! I really enjoy making up little tunes for them
@williampalmer805211 ай бұрын
I definitely agree with your observations. In my opinion, Jackson's Elves were depicted as otherworldly. Alien, even. They were detached from Middle-Earth, and their ultimate desire was to leave it entirely, almost as if returning to their home planet. I think Tolkien's intent was very different, and was in direct contrast with the movie's depiction. So movie Legolas was similarly an alien among the natives, and couldn't portray the deep understanding of the world, and the enlightenment that results from many hundreds of years of experience. He couldn't show the humility, and gentle humor, and the almost-paternal affection that would develop over the centuries for the childlike humans. That would be incongruous with Jackson's intent of showing Elves as being "apart" from the rest of Middle-Earth, though in fact it was they who were most closely entwined with it, and who understood it best. So to make Legolas more relatable than his alien kin, he was "bro"-ified. He was the token jock among the nerds. Or that's how I see it, anyway.
@micklumsden39569 ай бұрын
That Legolas and other elves were in the movies detached in this way was to me a great loss. From the books I had the impression that their love and understanding of the world grew through time, including their love of trees, hobbits and men. I felt that in the films the Elves were not treated with the respect that they deserved.
@gganbp11 ай бұрын
Book Legolas is my personality. Hopping like a child, random bursts at song, forgetting the lyrics to said song, falling of trees, screaming at ancient beings of pure evil and most importantly undying love for the people I hold dear
@teutonicholyblade88715 ай бұрын
Sounds cool 😎
@TheEvertw11 ай бұрын
About taking Glorfindel instead of Legolas, there are many reasons not to take Glorfindel. One of them would be that by simply being himself, he would over-arch Aragorn, taking away Aragorn's chance to step up into his Kingship. The story is about the time of the Elves finally coming to an end, and men taking their place. With Glorfindel, High Elf of a nobel house, befriending Gandalf in Valinor before their return to Middle Earth, slayer of a Balrog, it would be more like a repeat of the Last Alliance but on a smaller scale: a not-quite high king of the Elves defeating Sauron together with a not-quite king of the Numenorians. Which would make the Last Alliance, Not The Last Alliance.
@davidcook251311 ай бұрын
Not to mention that it would have been almost impossible for the fellowship to go ANYWHERE undetected or stealthily with an Elf like Glorfindel, who would be on the target radar of Sauron, Saruman and the Nazgul.
@KS-xk2so11 ай бұрын
@@davidcook2513 yeah I've often thought this myself. The sheer majesty that Glorfindel would project into the spirit world would certainly draw at bare minimum, Sauron and Saruman's attention, so stealth would be out. I mean if you send Glorfindel, might as well leave the other Hobbits at home and just stack the Fellowship with studs. Its a stealth mission though, so extra decoy Hobbits just makes way more sense, and literally works lol
@erynlasgalen19498 ай бұрын
@@KS-xk2soPlus, Glorfindel has died already, and it was getting old for him.
@markp606211 ай бұрын
Definitely prefer the book Legolas. I like the deeper exploration of his Elven heritage and, particularly, the call of the sea arc. That struck me the first time I read them in the early 70's when I was almost a teenager. No movie can ever match the depth of a book and this is a good example of how much can be lost and still maintain a quality film product. Thanks for sharing your insights!
@Jess_of_the_Shire11 ай бұрын
The idea of "longing" is so important to the elven character, it's a shame it was so difficult to incorporate into the film...still, it's beautifully presented in the books!
@guyr361811 ай бұрын
Movie-Legolas is definitely a less compelling character, but, to be fair to Peter Jackson - with Arwen's expanded role in the movies, Legolas no longer had to carry the burden of representing all elves by himself. Not to the same extent, at least. Arwen now shares some of that role, so, it makes sense to reduce his complexity and screentime in that context. It's okay that he's less compelling. Think about his "leaving middle earth for Valinor" arc, for example, which is axed in the movie - Arwen already gets a whole arc about having to choose between staying in Middle Earth or leaving it, so Legolas no longer needs to represent that concept on his own.
@Jess_of_the_Shire11 ай бұрын
This is such a great point!
@Lurklen11 ай бұрын
Well said. Not only was it not needed, there just wouldn't have been time for both. And I think that while Legolas from the books is missed, the uplift of Arwen as a larger presence in the narrative is a welcome one. Sadly, these kinds of choices must be made in those big productions, and for every thing gained, there is something lost.
@thomaskalinowski885111 ай бұрын
You've persuaded me to travel back in time and convince Tolkien that there's no need for Legolas at all -- he should send Arwen with the Fellowship. After all, Luthien joined Beren on his quest, Arwen should join Aragorn on his.
@Lurklen11 ай бұрын
@@thomaskalinowski8851 Hey, I don't think you need to time travel, just write that story. It'd be a cool take. The story of the elven princess who is supposed to stay behind while her destined lover goes of to face terrible evil, and perhaps never return, but who defies her role and instead goes to be at his side, sounds like it could be really good. Not enough stories are about a couple doing something incredible together. Honestly, I would freaking love a good adaptation of Beren and Luthien, but failing that, a story in that vein would be wonderful too.
@TrangDB99 ай бұрын
In the book it was Glorfindel who saved Frodo after he got stabbed by the Nazgul.
@Murdo211211 ай бұрын
I recall a quote from Tolkien (perhaps in one of his letters?), in which, while discussing the withdrawal of the Elves from the forefront of the major events of Middle Earth, he stated that "of all the Fellowship, Legolas achieved the least". So he definitely had the intention of Legolas serving as a vestige of the world that was passing, with the coming of the Dominion of Men. Even so, book Legolas was always one of my favourite characters, much moreso than movie Legolas. P.S. Pixies aren't from Irish myth, but from the Brythonic folklore of what is now the south-west of England (Devon and Cornwall). Edit: I found the quote. It's from Unfinished Tales, in the section dealing with the Istari: "In Sauron’s final overthrow, Elves were not effectively concerned at the point of action. Legolas probably achieved least of the Nine Walkers..."
@Jess_of_the_Shire11 ай бұрын
That's a great quote! I think a lot of people read it and think of it as a criticism, but I think it was very intentional. He was meant to accomplish the least, because elves were going to have to accomplish the least in order for history to move forward. And thank you for the correction! I was using it in the modern general sense, but I totally understand that may have confused things a bit.
@DarkElfofVulcan11 ай бұрын
I'm torn on this one. Book Legolas really does seem like more of an Elf, more light, more chill. But his relationship with those around him (Gimli aside) was relatively well shown in the movies despite everything. The random additions to the movies (like Aragorn's unceremonious falling off a cliff) was a bit silly but did give an opportunity to show Legolas caring for a moment. But, that is the problem, it's a moment. And the book has many moments of him being a very cool character, and so ultimately it's hard to say that snippets are in any way better. Still, I liked the portrayal in the movie for the most part.
@GigglingKat11 ай бұрын
I prefer the books, but really do love the films. As you said, two very,very different mediums. My headcanon is that the books are the Red Book of Westmarch, but the movies are sourced from the scrolls in the Library at Gondor - Men saw elves as alien, dwarves as cartoonish and hobbits as childlike. Faramir is seen by Frodo as immune to the ring but as told by Men we see the real temptation. Men also beefed up the role their beloved queen played. 😅
@ZephyrOptional11 ай бұрын
This made my day! Always a treat to hear you sing. Song is a great way to artistically experience Tolkien. Book Legolas (maybe elves in general) might be near impossible to represent accurately in film. For all the reasons you have meticulously covered, there is a tenderness, wisdom, playfulness, grace, fierceness and complexity in elves that might only be fully experienced by taking the journey to faerie JRR has thankfully provided us a ticket too, by reading their long tragic & beautiful history. Legolas is such a delight in the book. My favorite Legolas part is in the Ring Goes South, when he darts off from the rest of the fellowship on top of the snow telling Gandalf “Farewell, I go to find the Sun!”
@arcadianartist8 ай бұрын
This is such a good analysis on Legolas's character and Elves in general! And your song is really pretty, you have a lovely voice! I do actually like the decision to cast a young Orlando Bloom for Legolas (although I completely agree with your criticisms on how his actual personality was portrayed). While he is clearly ancient in the books, he has a lightness of heart and way of being that is truly youthful, and I always imagined him as one of the youngest Elves in Middle-Earth; from what I gathered, Elves weren't having a lot of kids past the Second Age, but I liked to imagine that Legolas was one of the few born in the Third Age, after the Battle of the Last Alliance (as there was no mention of his participating in it). That would just add an interesting quality to him that, although he is far older than human comprehension, he's still quite young for an Elf - a young sprout caught between the rise of Men and the fading of his own people. A descendent of the older generation fighting to rectify the failures of his forbears, much like Aragorn! That and he's just kind of a goof in the books. Anyways, your videos are always so fun to watch, and I love how in-depth you are with analyzing Tolkien's work in an honest and knowledgeable way while also bringing in some fun and picking things out from places I wouldn't expect or didn't know about (like the History Channel's 'biography' of Tolkien). I learn something new every time! Thank you for pouring so much time into this!
@toferg.826411 ай бұрын
When i learned that Elves could grieve to death, i from then on, imagined them as a bit odd, from holding in so much emotion, ready to burst forth, but seldom doing so.
@scotttaylor84622 ай бұрын
Singing caught me off guard. A pleasant surprise.
@leonwilkinson812411 ай бұрын
Jess, brilliant commentary as always. As you pointed out, book Legolas is much more multifaceted than in the movies, which, honestly, I think, trivialize both elves and dwarves. As I recall, Legolas relates that he doesn't sleep since he's constantly dreaming even while walking Middle Earth. How could you portray such a sublime state except in a book? You have a sweet singing voice. More, please, in future.
@chrisleach9094 ай бұрын
They do put a great Legolas reaction to the Balrog in the movie. Clearly he can’t scream “Ai! Ai!”, but when Gandalf says it’s a Balrog he’s the only member of the fellowship to know what it means, and it’s the only time we ever see him afraid. It’s a really nice piece of face acting from Orlando Bloom.
@GravesRWFiA11 ай бұрын
Tolkien made legolas , in the book, the least active of the fellowship to represent that elves are leaving middle earth and so it is little of their concern. Certainly movie legolas has limits but i think it's based on the fact movie gimli become little more than comic relief. One thing Jackson did do to show their friendship was before the black gate in Return of the King. Gimli growls "I never thought I'd die standing beside a pointy eared elf." "What about beside a friend?" "aye" and in that brief exchange the comic element drops away and he does show the depth of friendship that is otherwise lost in the movies.
@Rick_King7 ай бұрын
Do you know where Legolas got his name? As a child, his father, Tharndruil, made his grow up too quickly, and would not allow the young elf princeling to play with building blocks. He was Lego-less!
@thedarkdane711 ай бұрын
"The guy had a lot going for him." I agree! I have always been a huge Legolas fan (books and movies). I remember when one of the trailers for "The Fellowship of the Ring" premiered. My brother, sister, and I started freaking out because we could tell Legolas was walking on the snow. We were absolutely astonished by that level of detail. I hate it when people say Legolas is effeminate. There is more than one way to look manly. (And LOTR gives us MANY examples of that.) I remember that in the movie theaters (I was in the movie theaters many times for the LOTR movies) young ladies would often clap when Legolas came on the screen.
@grokeffer622611 ай бұрын
I liked both Legolas representations. One thing I noticed immediately was that movie Legolas fought with two daggers, while book Legolas had only one dagger to go with his bow. Once his quiver was empty, one knife always seemed a bit inadequate to me. 🗡🗡 You sing really well. 🧙♂👍 And your videos are always insightful. 🖖
@mikethewreck11 ай бұрын
Any episode where Jess sings is great by definition! Thanks for bringing Tolkien songs to life!
@ryangreen62558 ай бұрын
10:44 What a beautiful singing voice!
@khango61383 ай бұрын
Jess, your videos are quickly becoming among my favourite on youtube, and have re-ignited my interests and love for Tolkien's world and characters. I am around your age, and like you I grew up absolutely loving Peter Jackson's LOTR trilogy, which remains still among my favourite cinematic experiences. I have also read a Vietnamese translation, my native tongue, of The Hobbit. But I realise now that there is so much more adventure, songs and stories for me to explore on the pages of Tolkien's original works, and your videos have convinced me to go out and get me a copy of Lord of The Rings. I have a feeling I'll have a grand time indeed. Cheers, Jess!
@aaronswallow318911 ай бұрын
Legoloas is expository man in the movies. "Crenan from Dunland!" "Fell voice on the air" "Something is drawing near" "Lembas - something something way bread fill up the belly"
@kathleenhensley595111 ай бұрын
I would have loved a more fleshed- out Legolas... I was always intrigued by the elves... living centuries upon centuries.. what does that do to the mind and heart of fully aware soul, how do they deal with their griefs with their joys? How do they change over the centuries, or don't they? My husband commented that Legolas was a bone thrown to the ladies in the audience as was the constant on-screen presence of Arwen.
@destinypirate11 ай бұрын
Those are the truly engaging questions. We get bits of suggestion of this from Bombadil, but not an entire society.
@jessepurdom982311 ай бұрын
I much prefer book Legolas to the film version of the character, and pretty much for all of the reasons you present in this very well done video. Also, I greatly appreciate your comments concerning the way the Elves were adapted overall into the films. I have never liked the portrayal of the Elves in the movies, though I do quite enjoy films for what they are. Thank you for another excellent video!
@Jess_of_the_Shire11 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for watching, Jesse!
@2centswanted1137 ай бұрын
The singing was a pleasant surprise, thank you. As I've seen someone say before it's sometimes difficult to imagine book song. Like I was genuinely shocked and happy to find out the Hanging tree was a legit song from the books. Seeing mediums cross like this is beautiful.
@beatleblev11 ай бұрын
Legolas is the silent super hero who only speaks in one liners or wry looks on film. On the page, you get a clearer sense that he is akin to humans but definitely not kin. His "elven eyes" don't just see orcs from miles away, they see a long line of centuries past. His perceptions are featured more than his combat prowess in the Legendarium.
@MirkwoodElfAdventures11 ай бұрын
I forgot about the movies when my husband became Legolas to me. 🥰 He is such a well rounded character now 😂 We still enjoy the books yearly and write our own with his cosplay.
@thedarkdane711 ай бұрын
OK, that is really cute.
@justanotherredheadattheend95510 ай бұрын
Legolas was 12 year old me's dibs also, for the reasons listed ✨ Considering they couldn't really put his exclamation at the Balrog to film, I've always really loved what they did go with. His expression when Gandalf is describing it is such a pure picture of terror and disbelief, his eyes wide and glassy, I found it so troubling. One of the oldest and most skilled members of the Fellowship, looks like he's taking psychic damage just from knowing that thing is around the corner. The degree of his fear manages to convey that he also understands the full picture of just how screwed they are. It's like everything Gandalf is saying, distilled into one expression.
@jozz224811 ай бұрын
Looking very Game of Thrones holding that glass of red. Probably saved by being actual Brandywine 😊
@margaretalbrecht465011 ай бұрын
I have wondered if Legolas is from Gondolin. He could recognize a Balrog on sight. And we know there were Balrogs in Gondolin. But my favorite Legolas line is "It is old, very old," said the Elf. "‘So old that almost I feel young again, as I have not felt since I journeyed with you children."
@erynlasgalen19498 ай бұрын
He is not from Gondolin. He is the son of Thranduil, the unnamed Elvenking from The Hobbit. That means he is of the Grey-elves rather than the Noldor of Gondolin, and has a totally different culture and language. Eleven history is absolutely fascinating once you read The Silmarillion and the subsequent books of Tolkien's material.
@theuselessdrunk8 ай бұрын
please if we talk about characters who don't give justice to their book counterparts someone has to talk about Eomer. A king full of virtues just on par to Aragorn in the books, with whom he forms a beautiful bond. A gross ill mannered soldier with anger issues that barely interacted with any of the protagonists and even bullied Merry. to me this is by far the worst representation in the trilogy and i have nothing against karl urban but i think he never read the books
@RABartlett11 ай бұрын
For better or worse, Jackson probably did effectively de-Keeblerize the image of Elves. I once did a little bit of crowd work at a show, comparing a bunch of army buddies to the Fellowship, and calling the one with, shall we say, the softest features, the Legolas of the outfit. This bald, stocky guy in the group shouted "Hey! I anyone is the Legolas I am!" One of them asked who Legolas even was he was like "You got to understand. Legolas is the greatest, toughest, most badass of ALL the Elves."
@malkovich811 ай бұрын
Loved the video! Regarding the example you gave of Legolas's inverted word order, what stands out most to me is the emphasis that Tolkien puts on "tidings". "I must now tell the tidings that I was sent to bring" would change the focus of the sentence, giving greater emphasis to Legolas". "The tidings that I was sent to bring must now be told", firmly places "the tidings" as the subject and emplasis of the sentence.
@Ithirahad11 ай бұрын
Yeah... that never left English really. "So, all the news they sent me to tell y'all... I'm going to have to tell y'all now."
@Hehanni2 ай бұрын
I saw the movies and games all throughout my childhood. It gave me faces, voices, scenery, music, and emotion to use in my mind while reading the books. I loved seeing my favorite characters in my mind going through the expanded and deeper stories of the books
@richardmather190611 ай бұрын
I prefer book anything to what was done in the movies. One thing I found interesting in the book is how little the fact that Legolas is the son of the King of MIrkwood forest is played up in the book. Among men he rarely gets accorded much respect for that. It kind of shows how remote the Elves of MIrkwood are from the lives of men in Middle Earth.
@julianpeppers18894 ай бұрын
one moment form the books that genuinely made me sad was when legolas was singing the song of Nimrodel but stopped bc he forgot the rest...it showed the elves were already passing away into the lost mists of time even as they lived. a dying culture
@thedarkdane711 ай бұрын
While reading the books, I was always surprised that Legolas's character was not more fleshed out. But you make a compelling case - Legolas is present yet distant and this communicates his ancientness.
@chocolatemonk11 ай бұрын
thank you for the reminder of my love for these books. I appreciate your singing too.
@mattrobbins226811 ай бұрын
In the books Legolas comes across as a wide eyed innocent in many scenes. His skill as a warrior and his Elven field craft and wisdom are unquestionable, but he is constantly exclaiming at new and amazing wonders. And expressing sorrow at misfortune. In Jackson's movies Legolas is more of a laconic death dealer--Orlando Bloom actually described him as an assassin. He's like Clint Eastwood in Sergio Leone's westerns from the '60s. All he needs is a poncho, a hat, and a cigarillo. Pretty cool as a cinematic action guy, but l prefer the heart and relatability of Tolkien's original depiction.
@ericjbowman170811 ай бұрын
I agree with what you're saying at the end. I somewhat naiively thought that folks who loved the movies but hadn't read the novels, would go out and read the novels. Because they loved the story, and the characters, and so much of that got trimmed to make the movies. It broke my heart that I was wrong, knowing only ONE person who loved the movies and then read the novels.
@auntiegravity771311 ай бұрын
Add me to this short list.. I loved the movies so much I read the books, and ended up loving both for different reasons
@erynlasgalen19498 ай бұрын
I read the books as a college student in the early 1970s. The movies rekindled my interest, which hasn't stopped.
@MaestroGradius11 ай бұрын
Beautiful singing, Jess. Movie Legolas is perhaps more memorable for his skill with the bow and his super human agility (taking down the mastodon, oh my!)
@buckysgirl49459 ай бұрын
Legolas is the elven age equivalent of a teenager. It shows. Still wish we could've seen my twins Elrahir and Eledan.
@mug50229 күн бұрын
I've seen a lot of these "Book vs Movie" videos, but I've noticed you do these better than others. There's even some channels that are primarily LOTR ones that are often somewhat sterile in content. Plus, you're a good speaker in general.
@rksnj679711 ай бұрын
I definitely agree with the points you make, especially about different formats not being interchangeable. The books are of course are much better. When the movies came out a lot of fans of the books hated what they did to the characters, what was left out, etc. However, it did inspire many more people to read the books so I consider that a win. Thank you for singing the poem/song! It gave it more emotion. Beautiful voice by the way!
@tapunyr852611 ай бұрын
Book Legolas every time, even though Orlando was wonderful in the movies. Legolas is the only elf in all of Tolkien's writings that we learn details from, such as walking over the top of snow, 'dreaming' while still awake and sleeping with his eyes open - something which was given to Gandalf in the movies. Thank you for the wonderful character study of my all time favourite character 😊
@sirrickthe2nd5839 ай бұрын
I love when you sing, such a beautiful voice.
@cjb_writings7 ай бұрын
I don't know, I think the banter between Legolas and Gimli in the films is probably just a modern interpretation on friendship between men. 'I'll roast you, but we both know I don't care about the thing I'm roasting you for'
@speedythree11 ай бұрын
I enjoyed both Tolkien's original Legolas in the novels and Peter Jackson's interpretation of the character in his films; unfortunately, as you said, Tolkien's Legolas is far to complex a character to fit into the films (which, in many ways, is true of all of the characters of the "Lord of the Rings" books.) And I think you have nailed Legolas' "otherness" to the mortal characters of the book (and us.) Very well done.
@BanazirGalpsi196811 ай бұрын
My nieces pointed out the change in elves in the movies through a different character by referring to elrond as mr.grumpypants. when they said that, I began to notice that yes, elves became snarky serious Vulcan parodies in the film. And then there was Legolas worship like he was a one man boyband that definitely started to happen to Orlando bloom and was even poked at in daily comic strips in some newspapers.
@SLB45232 ай бұрын
Well put
@antonellamR2D211 ай бұрын
Jackson didn't get the Elves IMHO, only Galadriel was well carved
@Morithcat10 ай бұрын
I, for one, definitely feel like we should bring back crying 'Ai ai!' in moments of despair. Or at the very least 'woe oh wow'.
@bartlankheet902611 ай бұрын
I just have to comment again about how amazing your renditions of the songs and poems are! I would 100% save shorts of them to listen to again and again. You manage to get a very fresh take on them that I have not heard anywhere, and the mood always seems to fit extremely well with the imagery I have in my head
@thekillers1stfan11 ай бұрын
People are so bewildered by a person who doesn't like speaking and yet there are a huge amount of people who just don't want to talk all of the time. It's unrealistic to portray everyone as some source of exposition
@the_real_littlepinkhousefly9 ай бұрын
My first exposure to LOTR was through the movies. (Well, I had tried to read it in middle school and was completely bogged down within the first chapter and gave up.) So I have a very fond place in my heart for movie Legolas. After FOTR came out, I got the book and read it, and saw how very different both media were -- and still loved both. I guess because my first exposure to the Elven race was through the movies, I've always preferred they be a bit sombre -- after all, their time is fading, they're less invested in all things Middle-earth. And they're so old, they've seen so much, I would think by the end of the Third Age they would be less "merry". When I read the Hobbit, I was actually quite put off by the seemingly silly, cavorting Elves. (Maybe that was because I read the Silmarillion first and couldn't imagine the same people who killed their own kin over the jewels with the Light of the Trees in them would be singing merry songs and dancing like children -- that was my first read of the Sil...on the second reading I realized they weren't exactly the same people, that these Elves that were being goofy and having Middle-earth raves every night were the ones who had not been to Valinor and perhaps hadn't been in on all the battles and horrors of the First Age.) So -- I love both versions, and wish there could have been a way to combine both Legolases in the movies and fleshed him out a bit more. (The Hobbit movies Legolas is just ... gross.)
@Falesam11 ай бұрын
The book and movie Legolas have a calming, ever-standing, and reassuring presence to bring balance to the agitated ones I always loved. A type of person that is necessary in all groups, especially in the "end of all things" scenario we live in.
@themr_wilson11 ай бұрын
Back in Rivendell, when Frodo is recovering and the Fellowship walked into the room, Frodo said everyone's name but Legolas's, _because he totally forgot his name_
@somedandy76947 ай бұрын
And let us remember that Legolas shot a fell beast out from under a Nazgul on the Anduin River; a feat which Isengard Uruks used to mock the orcs of Mordor when they demanded Merry and Pippin.
@jose28071411 ай бұрын
Good video, you have to remember that Elves play a pivotal role within Tolkien lore, spite the movie and the book of LoTR they might look like their role fulfills a secondary background, the Elves are the primary beings at the Silmarillion, there the first age the battles against Morgoth, etc... then after reading the Silmarillion we get a pretty close understanding of what the Elves really are, they had access to the undying lands, they were invited by the Valars to Aman, they were transport by Ulmo through Belegaer etc.., they fought against the evilest creature and god like Valar, Morgoth, ... they passed throught Helcaraxë and many died the coolest frozen region of E just to make it to Middle-earth, etc.... They were fierce fighters, but also they were stubborn as you mentioned for the case of for example Fëanor the and Noldor house, they even turned evil, killing their own kindred when leaving Aman, etc... then seeing the dwellings of the Elves at the first age, changes the mindset about what they really are... The Elves along the men and Dwarfs face Balrogs, Dragons and evil creatures.... etc .... All of this happens at the Silmarillion and a lot more.... Saludos desde Costa Rica. xD
@davidvernon311911 ай бұрын
Lovely singing. Great choice of melody
@stevekluth906011 ай бұрын
I always imagined Legolas's Ai! was a scream, something like the Wilhelm Scream, and not saying a long "I" sound. Frodo in his bed in the Houses of the Healing also mouths the names of all the characters as they enter the room except Legolas, which really accentuates his backgroundness in the movies. (There's only music playing during this scene.) I much prefer book Legolas, but accept that Orlando Bloom was never really given the chance to be as rounded as the book character but did a fantastic job in the role as envisioned by Jackson.
@lotrsavvy11 ай бұрын
Ai actually is a Sandarin word meaning "ah" or "alas", so "Ah/Alas! A Balrog!"
@SLB45232 ай бұрын
For me, a distressed wail
@ThreadBareHope1234Ай бұрын
My brother said movie Legolas always looks like he's trying to riz someone up, the way he's squinting. I'll never unsee the flirty smolder. XDXD
@ChristIsKingPhilosophy9 ай бұрын
They gave those elf motifs to Arwen and Elrond
@eowynsisterdaughter11 ай бұрын
There's a lot that's done well with Legolas in the films, but it's true that I miss how it dimished his sense of humor, and especially how the book was able to touch on how he could look on eternity with anticipation and joy rather than with a sense of dread or monotony.
@albertbradfield194511 ай бұрын
When I first read The Lord of the Rings more than 50 years ago, I didn't appreciate the person of Legolas. But now all these years later, he has become a friendly soul who journey's with me as we head toward that undying land.
@povilzem5 ай бұрын
If Legolas were not a background character in the book, he would own the spotlight entirely.
@rbecker967911 ай бұрын
I feel like Peter Jackson was trying to create a more noticeable contrast between Elves and Men by making them seem more stoic, thus less "man like" than the books...make sense?
@TheEvertw11 ай бұрын
My wife also was a great fan of Legolas. Don't know why ;-) Me, I prefer the book Legolas. For his stalwarth support, his wisdom, being team player without any ego but lots to contribute.
@darylshort272911 ай бұрын
Your singing is absolutely beautiful. Gave me goosebumps just as it did in your "Gollum's Song" cover.
@P1Gman8 ай бұрын
Legs and Gims are my favorite parts of the entire series. An epic bromance for the ages.
@animistchannel11 ай бұрын
Wonderful! Always find your presentations compelling, and your interpretation of the sea-song was appropriately wrenching. I'd say it goes without saying, but I just said it; so there you go, and remember: "Wherever you go, there you are." ;) I found Legolas most compelling in the books (favorite member of the fellowship, actually), and they managed to salvage enough residue of that in the movies to at least refer back to that for those of us who had read them. (The movies had time for little more than easter-eggs to much of the text.) Legolas has both norse and shamanic elements, which makes him feel familiar both ways. As to Legolas' age, consider this: He immediately recognized a Balrog on sight, even though Gandalf didn't even know that "Durin's Bane" was one of them. That means Legolas was in Baleriand in the first age to fight the armies of Morgoth, before he and his father Thingol went back east and set up a kingdom in Greenwood the Great. Legolas was only 2-4 generations descended from one of the first 3 elf kings (Ingwe?) among the reluctants who delayed the invitation of Orome to go to the West. He also framed his age by saying that if he should meet Fangorn/Treebeard himself, [approx] "After walking with you children... then I should indeed feel young again." From these clues in the published texts, that puts him around the same age as Galadriel, and even she treated him as an equivalent/cousin among the numbers of their kind. As for comparing/analyzing the translations of books to movies, I think it is a worthy endeavor in an age where such efforts can and must be made. Of course, if we want a page-by-page fully fleshed out LotR movie series, all we need is an audience of billions to allow/ pay for it and six or seven 3+hour movies to record it instead of simple trilogy, as well as no need for regard to standard movie formatting or video storytelling ethics. It would literally take a 25+ hour documentary, or 3 seasons of an hour-format modern streaming TV show. "That day may come, but it is not today." :) Thank you so much for being you, and for bringing us all you do!
@ardethellis893011 ай бұрын
Book Legolas and Gimli for sure. Of course, I have a much longer aquaintance with the book characters having read the books the first time in 1968. Movie Legolas is certainly beautiful but none of the movie elves were as ethereal as my imgination. What the movies missed most agregiously, is that Legolas, Gimly, Boramir, and Aragorn are all sons of Kings/rulers, essentially equals at the start of the Fellowship. And all the last of their kind. For even though Aragorn's line continues, none of his offspring eclipsed him. The Hobbit was written for children but, the trillogy was written for the survivors of the world wars.
@TowelRanger4 ай бұрын
Can't bring Glorfindel instead of Legolas he's Glorfindel. Legolas might also be ancient and timeless, but Gandalf Firstname Lastnaming him in one of the books sounded like a grandparent scolding one of the grandkids at Christmas. It cracks me up to this day.
@johnkluge342111 ай бұрын
I love it when Gimli, Aragon, and Legolas get horses from the men of Rohan in The Two Tours. Legolas doesn’t need a saddle and can basically talk to the horse and just jump on him. It is a small thing but illustrative of just how cool elves are.
@erynlasgalen19498 ай бұрын
It's a little strange considering that Glorfindal in the book mentions both saddle and bridle on his horse.
@johnkluge34218 ай бұрын
@@erynlasgalen1949 that is a good point. I had not thought of that. Maybe it is because Legolas is a wood elf and they have a special connection to horses or something.
@erynlasgalen19498 ай бұрын
@@johnkluge3421 I'm a horse person myself. Any of us with a properly trained horse can ride without saddle or even bridle. But it's simply impractical for a number of reason, including having to pick horsehairs off your but when you reach your destination. Without a saddle, where do you tie your weapons and your other gear? A person has only two hands. I don't know what JRR meant to prove with this. I just write it off as Legolas showing off to the Rohirrim. A saddle is as much comfort to the horse as it is the rider. In the early day, fanfiction writers carried this to ridiculous extremes, as is the nature of the supposed gatekeepers of the Canon.
@johnkluge34218 ай бұрын
@@erynlasgalen1949 I grew up riding and I know what you mean. I have ridden bareback. The biggest problem is without stirups you get bounced all over the place at anything other than a walk. I don't think Tolkien knew anything about horses when he wrote that. It is a fun touch but he didn't think it through very well
@erynlasgalen19498 ай бұрын
@@johnkluge3421 You're telling me! Although a rider with a really good seat might be able to keep from bouncing so much. You know what else happens without a saddle? If the horse decides to stop dead on you at anything over a trot, there is very little friction and you slide right over their heard. My mare did that to me when I was about twelve, riding at a canter with just a halter and one lead rope to steer. She thought it was funny, no doubt. She gave me many flying lessons during her life. You can indeed control a horse with leg pressure and shifts of your weight, but only if they are disposed to it. It battle from horseback, swinging a sword or wielding a bow, how are you going to manage that without confusing the poor horse? It was a pretty notion, but completely impractical.
@deannakay660711 ай бұрын
I was conversing with some friends about the LOTR movie elves, and one of my friends blurted out, "Those weren't elves; those were Romulans!"
@timsheridan398711 ай бұрын
Having read many books that were made into movies across different genres with a book one is able to go much deeper not that movies are bad just very time limited keep up the good work
@rainbowhiker11 ай бұрын
For things have come and passed away, but born again in eyes with seasons of yesterday, these eyes that gleam over beauty and May, thy wrist as fair as a summers day, thine eyes are forever in my heart.
@CatholicElectrician7 ай бұрын
Can relate. My favorite was Legolas partly because my older brother had already claimed Aragorn. I miss those PS2 games
@ishmaelforester98258 ай бұрын
The highlight in the book is he sings a song of the lady nimrodel as they enter the elven land. In the film he kills two orcs with one arrow, it's awesome
@GityaLIVEdnb11 ай бұрын
Amount of perspective changing revelation to me is stellar
@AbhijeetBorkar11 ай бұрын
"Elves aren't meant to be outright assholes" Sons of Feanor would like to have a word!
@ethanquirk288 ай бұрын
Maedhros was chill
@alicequeenofspades11 ай бұрын
As a kid I had the biggest crush on Legolas, so much so that when I read the book I was put off by all the singing and merriment. I didn’t appreciate his book version until I was a lot older. Definitely prefer book Legolas now.
@ishmaelforester98258 ай бұрын
I love Tolkien's poetry but I also love Jackson's action. And fairies are gods of the vegetable world in Shakespeare. They are fun but not a joke in A Midsummer Nights Dream as John Tolkien knew well.
@MQuinn-fw5xv6 ай бұрын
I find it interesting that Tolkien chose a Wood Elf for the Fellowship rather than a High Elf from his household. The time of the elves was ending.
@galaxydeathskrill560711 ай бұрын
When I first read the books in August-September, i decided to listen along some of the poems in the story Nimrodel (performed by Vuctor Gondra) is one of my favorites, if not my favorite, and To The Sea captures his character so well! I realized how Legolas was embodied with the sea, which I really got off guard of, and I really love how lively he is while on a hunt along with "Long live the Halflings! Praise them with great praise!" and Eomer and Faramir's ceremonies, and Theoden's funereal I'd wish we could have witnessed them as well
@zu_145511 ай бұрын
Amazing singing voice. Caught me off guard.
@Jess_of_the_Shire11 ай бұрын
I'm glad you enjoyed!
@ohdarah7 ай бұрын
thanks for another great video Jess. I sometimes skipped the song parts in the books, but having you sing Legolas's lament was a gut punch!
@PhinAI11 ай бұрын
Glorfindel would have been spectacular!
@KevinKitten11 ай бұрын
Does Legolas's unusual speech patterns reflect that his first language is Silvan and he has spent millenia primarily speaking that and other Elvish languages?
@kevinroche333411 ай бұрын
As said elsewhere, pixies are certainly not Irish; in fact, legolas, and Tolkien's elves as a whole, are a very good reflection of Irish elves and their history, to the point where I would suggest he modelled them specifically that way. Beware the influence of American elves, dungeons and dragons, and Hollywood on your, otherwise fascinating, observations!
@themr_wilson11 ай бұрын
The outside light is hitting the curtain in such a way it looks like it has a belt buckle. It's neat, I like it
@davekat3 ай бұрын
This might be difficult for others to hear and accept, but Legolas says 2 things to Frodo. He also says " Come on!" to Frodo while catching him on the stairs in Moria.
@paulnormandin526711 ай бұрын
Your points are all wonderful and valid. I would only add that movie Legolas becomes “Supper Elf” during combat, displaying skills that the most battle hardened elves in any of Tolkien’s works would not have been able to achieve.
@erynlasgalen19498 ай бұрын
Right. I noticed the first CGI in The Two Towers. by the time they filmed The Hobbit it was all impossible crouching tiger hidden dragon stuff that no physical body could do. I didn't like it.
@robertericks11 ай бұрын
The homage to Chim-Chim Cheree from Mary Poppins is quite touching…
@TheDanielk48 ай бұрын
I love the deep Talks he has with Frodo in the Movies. Great Stuff.
@Fatherofheroesandheroines11 ай бұрын
I have always thought of Legolas as the author insert. He guides everyone on the path and gives little pieces of lore to let them now when they are of the path.
@StoriesThatSuck-pw1vi11 ай бұрын
I like both Legolases about equally, though for different reasons. I hope that makes sense. I consider the books and the movies to be two separate works of art, though based on the same idea, and I also allow for the differing requirements, limitations, and advantages of each media. I hope that makes sense.
@DahakaxX11 ай бұрын
Because the movies could go a little more indepth with "non-Fellowship" characters like Arwen, Elrond and even Galadriel, (at least when its comes to screen time!), there is no need for Legolas to just be "The Elf".
@claveworks11 ай бұрын
I'm not annoyed by it as such but, six films would have been better than three... Glorfindel, Tom Bombadil, the Barrow Wights, Fatty Bolger, Beorn, Quickbeam, and most of all the Scouring of the Shire could have made an appearance... Book Legolas and book Gimli could have then been filmed in a fairer way too. I know it would be maybe a bit boring though, especially if there was a better sense of the time-scale of say, Gandalf meeting Frodo at the party, and 17 *years* later when he comes back. There is also a lot of drama around Anduril - but I am pretty sure that Aragorn sets out with the sword that has been reforged right from the start? There is one thing I am extra thankful for though - Disney are not doing a LOTR 2 remake-style thing - that would be hideous beyond imagination!
@destinypirate11 ай бұрын
Did someone say the name "Bombadil" . . . Smiling :)
@vexaris189011 ай бұрын
Yes, Aragorn has Anduril with him from the start in the books.