The UK Nuclear deterrent. Fired using something that looks like a Scalextric controller.
@krystoph44207 жыл бұрын
Phil O'Shaughnessy works though
@Joe-fe4xi4 жыл бұрын
Phil O'Shaughnessy If it’s stupid and it works, it ain’t stupid.
@qasimmir71174 жыл бұрын
Joseph Fawcett Jingles?
@aldebaran92554 жыл бұрын
There are two. Red is the 'real' one and black for training. They are modeled on US Police Magnum pistols. Much heavier than the little Scalextric controller.
@saintsljp14 жыл бұрын
Keep it simple!
@krystoph44207 жыл бұрын
It's not under the sea, it's in the sea
@barnabyg68085 жыл бұрын
Simon Cowell so true, always pisses me off when they say that, planes don’t fly above the sky do they?
@exnavy19694 жыл бұрын
Agreed but show respect to the boys, i did it for 26 years, we miss our families and dont see daylight for up to 4 months at a time , we do it to keep our families safe
@benr74753 жыл бұрын
@@exnavy1969 could u talk some more about it I’m really interested and thinking about it my self
@josephwright63753 жыл бұрын
*hits joint*
@frankmcgee32135 жыл бұрын
I completed 19 deterrent patrols on US SSBNs and the similarities between the RN Tridents and US Tridents is remarkable. Spent many a fun day with UK crews in Kings Bay.
@derricklanders72604 жыл бұрын
Duh...maybe because Trident's are of American design?
@ianmcallister22684 жыл бұрын
No they aren't. Aspects of missile command and control are though which stands to reason given the missiles are from the US. Rest of the submarine UK design.
@Spookieham4 жыл бұрын
No - missile bodies are US, not sure about launch tubes. Hill, propulsion, control etc are all British although I am sure some US stuff is in non - critical areas. Reactor is entirely British design although the US did help obliquely in the early days. Now there is much more information sharing. Warheads are all British including the plutonium.
@Omegaman1969 Жыл бұрын
@@derricklanders7260 The Americans were not very happy with us for redesigning the warhead arrangement, the control systems etc.
@MK-rr7cg6 жыл бұрын
The 3 NATO countries that have a nuclear detterent: USA UK France
@monive39795 жыл бұрын
No turkey doesnt have nuke @Supreme Being
@harryj73414 жыл бұрын
@Slyeghost India has got nuclear weapons, but it is not part of NATO
@harryj73413 жыл бұрын
@ France rejoined NATO in 2009 after De Gaulle pulled the French military out of the alliance in 1966 (It always remained part of NATO from a political standpoint, however)
@tob193 жыл бұрын
The big powers
@martinmhonyera87933 жыл бұрын
Slyeghost not nati
@craigsimons8178 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Makes me proud to be British. More please loads more.
@lindasharratt17966 жыл бұрын
Craig Simons me too proud to be British!
@RadagonTheRed6 жыл бұрын
Me too brother.
@lordbucketheadpolling58245 жыл бұрын
@Ádhamh Séan Cathal lol no 😂
@alexandercarder22814 жыл бұрын
Me too
@Luguezinho3 жыл бұрын
@@Fishingadventureuk this dindt get old nicely
@rossblandford75583 жыл бұрын
Respect to those servicemen, I couldn't imagine living without daylight, electric light only day or night let alone the risks involved. We'll done guys.
@AnonAnonAnon2 жыл бұрын
I spent 13 years in the British Army. I always had a thing about going RN and aiming for submariner. I love subs. Wish I had done that to be honest.
@summerrr17 жыл бұрын
Money well spent.
@davidmolyneux17806 жыл бұрын
Definitely money well spent. UK should go all put andake us a lot more powerful. We have the cash.
@barnabyg68084 жыл бұрын
orbitaldildo almost every country is “broke”, there are very few countries without a budget deficit but we have the 5th largest economy in the world so... A superpower no, but then only the USA is, we are most certainly a global power though.
@barnabyg68084 жыл бұрын
orbitaldildo about the economy or the global power?
@RichARock4 жыл бұрын
@orbitaldildo wrong it isn't a super power but it isn't broke it is the 5th biggest economy and it's only rising when the coronavirus is gone
@RichARock4 жыл бұрын
@orbitaldildo America is in a lot more debt than Britain is same with China and other countries Why do countries do this? Because they get profit from it Britain is the 5th biggest economy in the world any reliable source would say that so stop lying to yourself
@sharonhewitson69673 жыл бұрын
Respect to all submariners.
@bulletproofcammy10228 жыл бұрын
I can't wait for the new ones to be built!
@MK-rr7cg6 жыл бұрын
Bulletproofcammy That be the Dreadnought class ballistic missile subs, 17,000 tons in weight
@VenezuelaNow6 жыл бұрын
Yes building more war machines all while your country falls apart from the inside out, nothing like spending tax payers money on war and screw the people domestically
@qv82816 жыл бұрын
50 Ducks In A Hot Tub deterrents maintain stability and in stability a nation thrives, the UK has been cutting back on military spending as the world was becoming more stable now there’s been a significant ramp up in global tensions there must be a build up of our military, before WW2 appeasement was used at the last minute to make time for rearmament and only let the third reich gain more momentum and confidence since then it has been British foreign policy never to bury our heads in the sand again.
@henryfchapman35446 жыл бұрын
I’m joining the submarine service when I’m 22, so in 2027, when the submarines will nearly be in service. Hopefully, by the time I’ve qualified they’ll be ready.
@benledger49154 жыл бұрын
@@henryfchapman3544 good lad
@RadagonTheRed6 жыл бұрын
1:14 - Oh dear, that chap looked rather embarrassed to have messed up putting his gas mask on.
@angusgrier56774 жыл бұрын
Imagine the commander of the submarine watching this next to the guy who messed up
@theodoremaximillios17973 жыл бұрын
Nah it ain’t a problem a little screw up is fine unless it’s a unstable weapon anyways
@thomassweeten4623 жыл бұрын
Was not a gas mask was line fed breathing apparatus similar to Self contained breathing apparatus worn by firefighters
@stephaniebarr5075 жыл бұрын
This deterrent force has helped keep the peace for over 40 years. Long may it continue.
@bh86713 жыл бұрын
*70 years. 🤔
@nigelbenn46423 жыл бұрын
Really? What kept the peace for Switzerland? Spain? Portugal? Sweden? New Zealand? None of those nations have Trident.
@raymondscott67203 жыл бұрын
@@nigelbenn4642 NATO
@nigelbenn46423 жыл бұрын
@@raymondscott6720 UN ( I can play the random naming game too)
@nigelbenn46423 жыл бұрын
@Hoy Sum Hoodwinked? I.e. were too obtuse, one thing I will never tolerate is lack of brains when it comes to NUCLEAR weapons.
@edbrook70882 жыл бұрын
good to see a news outlet actually reporting truthfully on our armed forces for once, instead of just criticising something it's obvious they know nothing about
@whiteribbonman18 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! Beautiful too! Not joking!! WHAT great looking equipment! England needs to produce a car similar to this!
@ThatSusLad7 жыл бұрын
whiteribbonman1 Rolls Royce or Bentley...
@whiteribbonman17 жыл бұрын
+English Patriot If your comment is a statement, I agree. If your comment is a question, I do not consider myself qualified to choose one. I WOULD however hope it be made solely in the United Kingdom, by hands of the United Kingdom. 😀
@alexandercarder22814 жыл бұрын
It would be a real big car 🚙
@nigelbenn46423 жыл бұрын
Yeah right, UK as an automotive manufacturing nation? Too funny, my abs are killing me now!
@SwitchTF23 жыл бұрын
I recognize this officer from the 2011 Perisher documentary. Glad to see he found a good command.
@bradjames67483 жыл бұрын
Love the British subs .....badass looking
@alanaspinall71472 жыл бұрын
Better to have them and not need them, then need them and not have them.
@whiteribbonman18 жыл бұрын
WHY would a reporter want to give up facts about this sub?! ANY REPORTER?! This machine is beyond awesome, beyond extraordinary . . . . . . AND there are his countrymen on board! God bless the United Kingdom for manning this sub!
@SM-ly5tf4 жыл бұрын
It's just banter captain obvious
@casper-z9rkls6gl3 жыл бұрын
Every government around the world knows far more about all other countries subs than this brief report.
@averagejoe83582 ай бұрын
1. It's literally on the royal navy website 2. Information like how much it weighs means nothing
@paulkwasu51002 жыл бұрын
Mrs Mary is legit and her method works like magic I keep on earning every single week with her new strategy.
@paulkwasu51002 жыл бұрын
I receive my profit every 5 day's thanks so much.
@gadomainasara85602 жыл бұрын
Wow I'm just shock someone mentioned expert Mrs Mary I thought I'm the only one trading with her, She helped me recover what I lost trying to trade my self.
@pacifymuhammadu72442 жыл бұрын
Yes I'm also a living testimony of expert Mrs Mary.
@adenikeayobami72322 жыл бұрын
Who's this professional, everyone is talking about? I always see her post on top comment on every KZbin video I watched.
@adenikeayobami72322 жыл бұрын
I think I'm interested how can I get in touch with Mrs Mary?
@ratherinteresting54573 жыл бұрын
He's having fun being secretive!
@mageofsin3 жыл бұрын
192 possible nukes is one hell of a deterrent.
@liamhorn11508 жыл бұрын
It remains secret where position of submarine at all time at sea
@jefferyfulkerson35848 жыл бұрын
The UK should just send flowers and pray that belligerent nations who have nuclear weapons do the same.Right?...WRONG!!! Strength and security through power!
@bambang3033788 жыл бұрын
No. Nice pray and pretty flowers must be send as well. But the recipients must also know. When it is needed. Nuclear tipped missiles can be send as well.
@alexandercarder22814 жыл бұрын
🤣😂🤣🤣 Amen to that pal
@cyclops91253 жыл бұрын
She is vanguard class
@richardgoode53146 жыл бұрын
A nuclear future as a defence in a regard as a generation of submarine.
@1000jpok3 ай бұрын
31 billion! so what we need to keep Putin at bay & that's that!
@richardpoblador91776 жыл бұрын
God bless Global Britain :=).
@ancientmariner1344 Жыл бұрын
Superb
@mathematics55733 жыл бұрын
to say "there are 17,000 nuclear weapons in the world today, and they represent an extreme threat to the UK", is perhaps a slightly melodramatic statement and a bit naive. During the cold war, which lasted about 44 years, no nuclear bomb was ever fired. I agree the UK needs submarines and ships to fire nuclear weapons to protect the UK, if needed, but . . . well. I said it above.
@FowlorTheRooster19903 жыл бұрын
nuclear weapons will make both sides lose nobody ever wins in a nuclear war
@Markem19983 жыл бұрын
3.20 In other words fight fire with fire lol 😂
@saad36772 жыл бұрын
1:16 The fire drill confused me, was it the missile firing they were partaking or fire on board 😋
@piotrd.48505 жыл бұрын
With new ships, Vanguard class could be rebuilt into SSGNs, carrying special forces and mix of Scalp-Naval, Tomahawak and LRASM missiles. Pretty much like Ohio.
@CH-pv2rz2 жыл бұрын
Their hulks are approaching end of life.
@polarisukyc12047 ай бұрын
Is this supposed to be instead of scrapping them when the Dreadnought class gets going, cos I don’t think it’s a good idea to convert a Vanguard into a sort of ‘Super Astute’ class, primarily because they are quite old now
@cameronmclean77123 жыл бұрын
“Heavily Guarded”…With an SA-80😂
@rebel1052k3 жыл бұрын
and a laminated navy biff chit
@MarineAqua453 жыл бұрын
At 0:23 a police boat,which is probably,an MOD police boat,with heavily-armed cops onboard.
@WillCarrollHamilton3 жыл бұрын
in*
@05jgardner4 жыл бұрын
the captain is English dan. there is a documentary on him and others taking the perisher submarine captain course.
@Jack-pp7td3 жыл бұрын
I nearly started serving on one of these. I passed the interview for submariner and then immediately said no lmao rather be on a boat
@DaveFlight-n2f8 ай бұрын
Best get your vote in parliament done sooner then. I doubt we can build 4 new nuclear subs in just 4 years. We never do anything first time and on budget. So I estimate 2040 😂😂😂
@stevejory96795 жыл бұрын
Listened to similar interviews of American submariners, all gung ho, while the Brits very calm and quietly efficient.
@immortallvulture4 жыл бұрын
Steve Jory the Royal Navy submariners are nicknamed ‘the silent service’ for good reason
@darrellcrawford17693 жыл бұрын
Go Brits!
@pin00ch Жыл бұрын
But are we protected? or are the government protected?
@amanthakur76162 жыл бұрын
Lol sailors in submarine suffer with radiation 🤣🤣😂😂😀😀😂🤣🤣
@ux34762 жыл бұрын
No, they are kept in a secure part of the submarine preventing the men from getting any radiation
@sergepajcin12555 жыл бұрын
Send couple to moscow
@vortex66423 жыл бұрын
Execute Order 66
@mixturetv4020 Жыл бұрын
Protect from who can’t we talk
@johnnicolson4674 жыл бұрын
Trident will probably have to be kept in Portsmouth after Scotland is Independent as the people in Scotland want rid of Trident.
@franciswaters70433 жыл бұрын
Well... sure
@Jman21UK7 жыл бұрын
What's the difference between vanguard and astute?
blardmann I thought astute also carryed trident missiles?
@blardmann7 жыл бұрын
A-random-stormtrooper nope just vanguard
@krashd6 жыл бұрын
Astute are attack subs, Vanguard are ballistic subs, our attack subs hunt their ballistic subs and their attack subs hunt our ballistic subs. It's cat and mouse except the mice are way bigger than the cats and very good at hiding.
@richkingb016 жыл бұрын
One's a vanguard class. The other is not. Lol
@seanek93 жыл бұрын
“This is the missile compartment”. Fun fact. By act of US Congress no British servicemen or contractor may touch or inspect the Trident missiles as they are classified and still the property of Lockheed Martin. Loading and unloading of missiles my only be carried out by US personnel at a US naval base.
@ruan59593 жыл бұрын
Load of bollocks. We are allowed to do what we want with them.
@ianmcallister22683 жыл бұрын
Absolute rubbish they are loaded onto the boats in Scotland.
@scottiramage3173 жыл бұрын
How do they get the warheads onto them so new the warheads are British - the trident D5 is a joint pooled asset
@Baxicle Жыл бұрын
lets hope he doesnt accidentally press that armageddon button / planet destroyer 5000
@MrHalvnir8 жыл бұрын
Pray, why are they wearing 'breathing gear' inside the sub when commencing to launch the Trident II missles ?
@robinmonkmanmusic8 жыл бұрын
MrHalvnir It was a fire drill 😂
@milesrichardson15797 жыл бұрын
First thing they do in a fire is crash stop ventilation to stop thesmoke spreading. We then start "sucking rubber". Breathing from the emergency breathing system. Happy dayz
@fredm.94744 жыл бұрын
Deploy central out
@samwilkinson25345 жыл бұрын
If the submarine was to be blown up, would the warheads go off?
@Spookieham4 жыл бұрын
No impossible - a lot of very complex things need to happen in a very precise sequence for a thermonuclear weapon to detonate.
@howardstephens50033 жыл бұрын
I think that near to what a dirty bomb is, the nuclear detonation doesn't take place but the conventional explosion would release radioactive material.
@thozz3 жыл бұрын
Howard Stephens .... mainly from the nuclear reactor rather than the missile warheads
@polarisukyc12047 ай бұрын
Well, it is conceivable but extremely unlikely. It’s more likely that the conventional explosives would go off out of sequence (or only partially) this wouldn’t cause a nuclear explosion but would spread the fissile material around a bit, not quite Hiroshima or Chernobyl but still bad
@Fishingadventureuk4 жыл бұрын
The cold War is over guys
@admiralmallard7500 Жыл бұрын
Doesn't stop Russia and China being a threat
@george55904 жыл бұрын
ok so they have 12 war heads on each missile , does that mean , they drop , them of on the way??
@jonnymcfarlane78664 жыл бұрын
the warheads are released as the missile comes back into orbit, warheads then hit different targets
@Spookieham4 жыл бұрын
They can manouvere during their ballistic trajectory in the upper atmosphere so they can hit different targets. Some are not warheads but decoy penetrators to fool anti-missile defences. The exact setup is needless to say stunningly secret.
@george55903 жыл бұрын
@@davidcollins9258 interesting and that is one misile ?thanks mate
@heyynow61766 жыл бұрын
Trident missiles are American ?
@barnabyg68085 жыл бұрын
Heyy Now trident missiles are US made, the warheads and submarines are from the UK
@derricklanders72604 жыл бұрын
@@barnabyg6808 The warheads are useless without the missile that carries them...
@barnabyg68084 жыл бұрын
Derrick Landers in the same way that missiles are useless without the warhead. One is useless without the other
@DaGabbaGangsta4 жыл бұрын
trident is the delivery system, american technology, we supply the war heads and submarines, as far as i know the americans maintain the system for us
@peterd7884 жыл бұрын
@@DaGabbaGangsta The missiles are maintained in the US and rotated from a common pool used by both navies. The UK uses its own warheads based, it is believed, on the physical properties of the American W76 warhead. The US uses w88 warheads as well. In the future both navies will use "independently developed" but strikingly similar warheads which America is calling W93. The reason why it is stressed they are independently developed is that both countries are signatories of the non-proliferation treaties and the two countries can't swap nuclear weapons technology. Wink, wink.
@prattait75943 жыл бұрын
Our Armed forces in UK are our heroes and Sturgeon wants rid of them.
@exnavy19694 жыл бұрын
I spent 17 on these boats before switching to hunters , it a good thing that we do 😳💥😜
@Lat2654 жыл бұрын
lol sure u did
@davidstabler36714 жыл бұрын
Cannot understand telling where these ar ffs
@immortallvulture4 жыл бұрын
It’s pretty common knowledge that the subs are based at faslane
@madzen112 Жыл бұрын
UKs access card to the big boys club
@darklord11344 жыл бұрын
Don't get me wrong great programme, but why do they have to include the same old boring fire drill ever time?
@billjohnson73475 жыл бұрын
I think Lt. Woods ate one of the missiles.
@halemethodmathematics22903 жыл бұрын
Heavily guarded lol - one bloke with an SA80 is then seen...
@AverageWagie2024 Жыл бұрын
It’s also guarded by a battalion of Royal Marines
@D3xt3rity3 жыл бұрын
I kinda wanted there to be a big red button saying "Break in an emergency". Naturally when I come to power this shall be remedied.
@bellswebster57752 жыл бұрын
they aren't so secret when the world finds out what they are doing.
@stephensmith4480 Жыл бұрын
Yeh, But The World Doesn`t know where they are. Muppet.
@bellswebster5775 Жыл бұрын
@@stephensmith4480 Not too hard to find out these days with the tec knowledge that the world has now. Fraggle.
@shetijay3 жыл бұрын
Are trident submarines capable to protect her colonial African countries if that country were to be in a nuclear threat.
@christineallen71705 жыл бұрын
3 months at sea! Submerged! Why? Coz they have scalelecric! Why not. Thanks for keeping the bogie man away from uk....stay safe chaps
@jomargarcia59843 жыл бұрын
Send those missiles to China
@JI7NKJ3 жыл бұрын
Rule Brittania.
@marymeehan61457 жыл бұрын
that submarine is ????
@krashd6 жыл бұрын
HMS Vigilant
@владимирходаревский3 жыл бұрын
Здравствуйте, спасибо. Несколько минут назад прочитал сообщение "BBC" о намерении ввести 2-а корабля в Чёрное море : лучше бы лорды пили чай у себя дома. Флот USA вызывает уважение, достаточно сравнить лица экипажей. Извините
@grantchallinor52633 жыл бұрын
Мой отчим служил на предшественнике "Трайдента" (подводной лодки "Поларис"). Он сказал, что они никогда не считали российских подводников своими врагами - и уважали их, поскольку они выполняли ту же сложную работу, что и они. К сожалению, Великобритания, Франция, США и Россия нуждаются в таком оружии. Я думаю, что многие британцы согласились бы с вашим комментарием о Черном море. США никогда не должны были финансировать государственный переворот на Украине и должны были позволить Украине сделать свой собственный выбор.... Это действительно угрожает миру, который установился в Европе после окончания Второй мировой войны, когда другие страны ввязываются в махинации на границе с Россией.... Владимир, пожалуйста, извините мои плохие навыки письма по-русски.
@Tomartyr3 жыл бұрын
@@grantchallinor5263 Most Britons agree that Russia had no right to annex Crimea. It doesn't matter if they agree of disagree with the direction Ukraine was going they aren't Ukraine's overlords anymore, nor are they the masters of the black sea.
@mikemanners10695 жыл бұрын
Send those beauties to the Persian Gulf and park them off of Iran's coast........
@qasimmir71174 жыл бұрын
That may be where they are.🤷🏻♂️
@MG-bs5mr3 жыл бұрын
Why have them that close? They'd be just as effective in the Indian Ocean.
@neilnelson76033 жыл бұрын
Now thats how a nutjob sounds like. It's good your job is to type useless comments behind your basement.
@YUSKHAN7 жыл бұрын
4 nuclear warheads
@blardmann7 жыл бұрын
that's wrong. just saying :)
@jakehayes19986 жыл бұрын
It can be 16 if we wanted but we only put 8 with 5-6 Warheads and two with 1 for rouge nations and tactical uses, we load them on what the threat is based on currently.
@YUSKHAN6 жыл бұрын
Jake Hayes all these missiles can be shoot down during thier booster phase
@mashbury3 жыл бұрын
This came up on my feed for some reason today and I’ve never been more scared of the future knowing that our joke of a PM Johnson has a role with the nuclear button .. and I lived near Devonport in the 1970,s and 80,s ..
@onetruekeeper4187 жыл бұрын
Why does not the Queen have launch authority and only the Prime Minister? What happens if both are taken out?
@markjackson76507 жыл бұрын
onetruekeeper there is a letter on board the sub called the letter of last resort or something to that effect. and it is the last official act of HMG. in the event the prime minister is killed and contact cannot be made to mainland UK by the sub. the letter is opened and it states what the prime minister wants the captain to do with the sub. I believe the options available are to hand the sub to another nato country (most likely America) or use the weapon against whoever nuked Britain.
@onetruekeeper4187 жыл бұрын
I assume this letter has the launch codes to enable missile launch at the Captain's discretion?
@markjackson76507 жыл бұрын
onetruekeeper not entirely sure the only person who will ever truly know is the prime minister as the letter is destroyed unopened when a new prime minister is elected
@Spookieham4 жыл бұрын
She doesn't need to. The crew swear allegiance to the Queen, her heirs etc and her appointment government. The PM acts with her authority therefore orders from him/her are lawful.
@willdavis65043 жыл бұрын
@@onetruekeeper418 they don’t have launch codes they are key based
@616CC4 жыл бұрын
I’m going to give the benefit of doubt to that sailor I don’t think he understood the question fully
@Spookieham4 жыл бұрын
Oh believe me he did. He knows that if he does have to pull that the trigger his family etc are almost certainly already all dead and the UK hammered my nuclear bombs.
@stevejory96794 жыл бұрын
Imagine asking the exact same questions to an American submariner, all bullshit, bluster and gung-ho. The English, calm, efficent and professionally under stated.
@neilnelson76033 жыл бұрын
They forgot to say that, they can't launch without US President's say so.
@MB-eb5ir3 жыл бұрын
Well there can. Theres just an agreement in place for another 5 years.. only down side is Washington provide most of the key parts that make it a nuke... it would be mentle to think a country can not protect themselfs without permission from another country. Nukes are very expensive to keep. Especially when I can not see them ever been used..
Thank god for Trident, prevented terror attacks like the 7/7 bombings. . . oh wait! It didn't!
@jamesdavies49947 жыл бұрын
Anna Key it prevented the Cold War from ending the world. Be a little more grateful
@MutualAidWorks7 жыл бұрын
No, things like Trident came close to ending the world.
@Alex-bf7mc7 жыл бұрын
what a stupid comment
@jamiengo23437 жыл бұрын
Well what are they supposed to do, nuke London and kill everyone in it so we can kill the ONE guy that bombed London
@qasimmir71174 жыл бұрын
Your ignorance is beyond repair.
@Samuels6917 жыл бұрын
Billions and billions on weaponry whilst we watch our NHS waste away and poverty rise on UK soil. It's my prayer that one day a multilateral disarmament occurs (If possible a unilateral. I don't care what other countries are doing). I just wonder what steps the current govt are making to work to this.
@angeryspheesmarheen76567 жыл бұрын
Billions on nuclear weapons to stop a major war is more important than the NHS in stance. The world has a forced peace because of these weapons, if we didn't, the world would be fighting eachother every day of the week.
@ollie11547 жыл бұрын
The money also comes from our Defence Budget, there's no point of having an NHS if there is no Britain. Also the NHS is underfunded but also over used especially by health tourists
@justwayne47857 жыл бұрын
There are ways to save billions in the NHS, but the Politically Correct culture won’t allow it.
@jamesjones52665 жыл бұрын
No point in a NHS if there’s no one to use it😂
@immortallvulture4 жыл бұрын
We spend 2% of the governments budget on all the armed forces (not just the nuclear weapons) the NHS budget is closer to 20% second only to the budget for the DWP