I would love to live in a world where everybody is just dancing all the time for no reason
@orangegaming95624 жыл бұрын
I’d gladly live in a world with a floating turtle made by a 3 year old lol
@monke51004 жыл бұрын
@@orangegaming9562 I don't think it was by a 3 year old
@orangegaming95624 жыл бұрын
@@monke5100 ik, but if I was told that was made by a 3 year old I wouldn’t argue
@monke51004 жыл бұрын
@@orangegaming9562 oh, my bad, didn't know that
@Lixxide7 ай бұрын
what is stopping you ?
@juanandrescastillofuenmayo66193 жыл бұрын
Truttle: I want to keep this channel family friendly! Also Truttle: 1:46
@amasende21 Жыл бұрын
the only non-family friendly truttle video
@YEWCHENGYINMoe Жыл бұрын
1:47
@rayanactivities54111 ай бұрын
2:27
@Wobblybob20043 жыл бұрын
Kitchen sand? Isn't that salt?
@elemenopi92393 жыл бұрын
esolang that makes you write the next death grips album
@Subroutine22 жыл бұрын
I feel the main premise of this lang is the same as length, just with scrabble in mind instead.
@Erstelltvon Жыл бұрын
Beatnik sounds like Beat mea-
@rhdevelops60234 жыл бұрын
Instead of pushing and popping, the language seems like it's popping and locking
@JamUsagi3 жыл бұрын
Can we appreciate that the creator’s name is Cliffle Biffle
@snyntakk40433 жыл бұрын
the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy reference as 0:40 was hilarious
@schwarzeseis40313 жыл бұрын
Sending love! I discovered Beatnik earlier this week and it's my favourite new toy atm. I have read that it is not turing-complete, but implementing multiplication and division was relatively* easy -- today, I solved arbitrary comparison which can give output depending on equality, lesser, and bigger. Which is a stepstone for multidigit in/out-put**, as far as arithmetics are concerned. __ *) will most likely require more than 5.000 and less than 100.000 words of code. I exploited the limitation of the number range, which is not mentioned in the video. **) Beatnik at face value allows input only one byte at a time. What I am looking for is an arithmetic algorithm, that takes as input: + an operation + two numbers and then outputs the result, without driving the user insane (accepting user-insanitiy would be easier to implement, tbh). So far, I managed to solve for addition for bases 1 (push every 1 from input, then print every item from the stack), 2 (introduces the concept of carrying), 3-10 (implements carrying and extends on it by checking if any couple of digits' result requires carrying.) However, the adding algorithm is expected to crash to terminate, but hopefully, user will be able to read the result, upside-down. Unless there is a power-outage. Because saving in file? I don't dig.
@Truttle13 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment, black ice. :)
@schwarzeseis40313 жыл бұрын
@@Truttle1 thanks for being awesome!
@schwarzeseis40313 жыл бұрын
Little update: A calculator for +-*/ turns out to be possible (with certain restrictions). Actually codig it: Prepare to write an Epos!
@kilgarragh3 жыл бұрын
if you want to do a little more programming things, load, has the scrabble score of 5 pushing onto the stack take, has the scrabble score of 8 taking input from the user
@neverdie00012 жыл бұрын
My idea: Objective Beatnik Numbers: Each word value is turned into a character, then the whole string is parsed into a float (all subsequent decimal points or minus signs are ignored). An ellipsis "..." next to a word means to ignore that word. 5-14: 0-9 15: decimal point 16: minus sign e.g. -12.34 can be written like this: 16, 6, 7, 15, 8, 9 Any other values are ignored. Commands are written like this: (opcode) (punctuation) (argument if any) (punctuation) Opcodes (absolute value is taken first): 0,n: push n onto stack 1,0: pop x,y, then add 1,1: subtract 1,2: multiply 1,3: divide (x/0=inf, 0/0=NaN) 1,4: modulo 1,5: power 1,6: pop x, push sqrt x 1,7: pop x, push ln x 1,8: negate: pop x, push 1 if x=0 or NaN, 0 otherwise 1,9: less: pop x,y, push 1 if x
@KtosoX3 жыл бұрын
Commenting to feed the algorithm. No idea why it sent me here, but a good find deserves a little snack :)
@anthonydalfonso84705 жыл бұрын
I enjoy this video like I enjoy the consumption of paper
@efhiii5 жыл бұрын
How much do you enjoy the consumption of paper? I'm fairly sure that most people haven't given it a try, and it's certainly not recommended for most types of paper, but some people (like John Green for example) do occasionally consume paper or toilet paper with varying degrees of enjoyment, partially dependent on the makeup of the paper since some paper tastes better than others.
@rodrigoqteixeira5 ай бұрын
Bro really took 3 years to make the vid 💀
@YEWCHENGYINMoe Жыл бұрын
1:47
@SysFan808 Жыл бұрын
couldn't you've just ninja'd the sand be?
@battlefox76143 жыл бұрын
haha program go 🅱️
@javaaugustus44695 жыл бұрын
Kitchen sands could be.... *An abandoned kitchen within a king's castle?*
@tux14685 жыл бұрын
1:47 omg a bad wurd!!!1 Also, here is a great video about stacks: kzbin.info/www/bejne/f4i0aGecZ9Snbac Also also, this video seems very slow. Also also also, the boss should be classified as an SCP for writing cognitohazardous poetry. Also also also also, this comment could be a program in an esoteric programming language.
@Truttle15 жыл бұрын
2:30 is how I anticipated the comment section will react to that word.
@Truttle15 жыл бұрын
And yes, this video was slower, but that was due to people telling me I was going too fast in earlier videos. :p And your comment causes a "pop from empty stack" error when run in Beatnik.
@irchriscott3 жыл бұрын
My favourite part of your videos is NOTHIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNGGGGGGG
@ghanatosthanatos33633 жыл бұрын
Just wondering, at one point you say that the hardest is to get to 65 in the alphabet and then it's just a matter of duplicating and adding small numbers. But can't you push directly a value of 65 by putting a very long word in your program?
@pantallahueso3 жыл бұрын
Yes. But that would be inefficient. Imagine how much longer Brainfluff’s Hello World program would be if it just started with 65 +’s. It would work, but it’d be terrible.
@ghanatosthanatos33633 жыл бұрын
@@pantallahueso yeah but here it's beatnik not brainfuck 😌
@cmyk89642 жыл бұрын
Some very long words for use in Beatnik, for your consideration: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch = 110 “n” pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis = 68 “D” floccinaucinihilipilification = 48 “0” antidisestablishmentarianism = 38 “&”
@official-obama2 жыл бұрын
@@cmyk8964 in toki pona, kijetesantakalu is 30.
@official-obama Жыл бұрын
@@cmyk8964 1 puts you in the middle of the lowercase letters 2 puts you at the start of the uppercase letters 3 puts you EXACTLY at the start of the digits 4 puts you near the punctuation, and math operators
@monke51005 жыл бұрын
The sound is too loud sometimes. Maybe look into sound compression in you're editing software
@faisaltaher8515 жыл бұрын
i agree
@Blue-Maned_Hawk5 жыл бұрын
*you're
@dodgeneon80935 жыл бұрын
@@Blue-Maned_Hawk it's actually your
@Blue-Maned_Hawk5 жыл бұрын
@@dodgeneon8093 Either way, the first guy got it wrong
@monke51005 жыл бұрын
@@Blue-Maned_Hawk I made an edit for you
@masonthedunce37115 жыл бұрын
yay!
@billclinton49135 жыл бұрын
You should have More following.
@cindrmon3 жыл бұрын
i really enjoy your use of TheFatRat music throughout your videos! are you a fatrat fan?
@gamersunite90263 жыл бұрын
beatnik(todeath)
@pryl5 жыл бұрын
have you ever made your own esoteric language
@dtrevived51115 жыл бұрын
Yes truttle made his own esolang, that is called "uyjhmn n".
@WilliametcCook3 жыл бұрын
Arent pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis, etc. in wanted values?
@mr.duckie._.8 ай бұрын
beatnik applause
@Scrolte6174 Жыл бұрын
2:30 W̵̬̒H̸̠̃A̵͇͂Ţ̸͛
@vicr1235 жыл бұрын
Is that Rook I saw?
@Xcalzibur4 жыл бұрын
Why do you have to count to 66? Is there a limit on how long words can be? Or is it just because it would not actually be a word to get it to 66?