Why you don't use FT8? And then you have to read the results on the PSK Reporter?
@johnwest7993 Жыл бұрын
I figure the greatest advantage of a small mag-loop is that it can be very narrow-banded on receive to limit noise, meaning having a high Q. That is done by having very low RF resistance, i.e. a large surface area conductor to reduce skin-effect losses. Coincidentally, that is also essential in order to get anything like acceptable transmit efficiency from such a tiny antenna relative to the wavelength on HF. So a large diameter conductor is mandatory for a mag-loop to be at all effective. I used 1 5/8 inch diameter hardline scraps to build both of my mag-loops, and they work well. But to further improve on them I plan to try using aluminum roof flashing instead. Basically, using the inner conductor of standard coax will provide a very low Q because of the inner conductor's tiny surface area. If you aren't somewhere noisy so you don't need a narrow receive bandwidth antenna then using the outer braid as a conductor may work on receive OK, but for QRP transmitting it will provide you with only a few milliwatts of ERP. I'm a die-hard QRP fan, but I do enjoy actually making a contact once in a while, and a few milliwatts will seldom make an HF contact these days even using digital modes. Good luck, and thanks for the video. - 73
@bengeijtenbeek93947 ай бұрын
I have orderd a loop by you , i follow you for a year now , i purchased a Xiegu x6100 and gone try to make some dx's from the 10th floor iam living.. I wil post the results.. Thanks Paul for some realy good Video's !!
@OM0ET7 ай бұрын
Thanks Ben, I hope you will work Europe from your flat 😉👍 possibly we will meet on the air! 73
@daveyjones6465 Жыл бұрын
Great job it looks to be very efficient as a receive antenna on 80m and maybe with a small increase in power it may well be heard better on transmit.and as you say arrange with a fellow ham operator to trial it out
@salat Жыл бұрын
Why are you using only the inner conductor in normal operation? Wouldn't it be better to use the outer conductor (=shield) for higher surface area and lower impedance (skin effect)? Also: Aren't you effectively shielding the inner loop with the outer one when doing a "two turn loop" in one cable?
@adnana18989 ай бұрын
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@AbdulMalik-in3clАй бұрын
Very interesting Paul, maybe I will try to make it for my qrp needs best regards de yb2bam
@gagabinu Жыл бұрын
Hey Paul, how about a test at 80m with 20W power?
@DC6NS10 ай бұрын
Hi Paul, I purchased your MC-20 and it works well! But wonder why you do not use the shiel of the main coax-loop? So I have the same question that @salat asked a month ago: "Why are you using only the inner conductor in normal operation? Wouldn't it be better to use the outer conductor (=shield) for higher surface area and lower impedance (skin effect)? Also: Aren't you effectively shielding the inner loop with the outer one?" Can´t imagine why it works this way 🙂would be glad if you teach me. Very 73, Bernhard
@herberthuber409 Жыл бұрын
Hello Paul, good modification, great tool, very creative, maybe something like that will come, for 26,27,28 MHz at some point, 73,
@frankfoduw-ci8rr Жыл бұрын
It will be a good loop antenna for SWL on MW and SW AM radios ?
@ontarget191110 ай бұрын
Briiliant!!
@ICEDoTDK Жыл бұрын
godt job
@JabiAguirre-s1g Жыл бұрын
Good morning: what receiver you have using? You are selling the antenna with modifications? Regards de Jabi, ea2aru.
@mrtonicsvls362411 ай бұрын
Lo spazio lamellare è molto stresso nel condensatore variabile, siamo sicuri che sia adatto anche alla trasmissione?
@aerovideos2 ай бұрын
Hi. Where is the link for this new model please ?
@MrDwadi8411 ай бұрын
Hi Paul I have question if you have any plan to sell this verion of your antenna? You can also sell upgrade kit for existing antennas, your antennas is very elegant design, so waiting for any news about project, 73
@manuelb196423 ай бұрын
Perfet
@axi6ne8us7 ай бұрын
Is an automatic tuner required for this MC-20 antenna to work with my IC-705?
@rttakezo2000 Жыл бұрын
Surprised your capacitor could provide enough C for 80m
@Ľubomír_Kuzman Жыл бұрын
Ahoj Paľo, hlásim sa k testovaniu dosahu. Až budeš chcieť testovať s niekým z OM, pošli správu. TNX es 73 de Lubo OM6IN
@bussi785926 күн бұрын
Your efficiency on 80m with this antenna is about 10%
@bengeijtenbeek93947 ай бұрын
your on 5 watt also!
@jansoffa80226 ай бұрын
Support 100W OM0ET )
@OM0ET6 ай бұрын
Nope
@DJMotavirustАй бұрын
It seems like a moebius antenna.
@AnyoneSeenMikeHunt Жыл бұрын
Why is it these antennas cost $40 from a no name manufacturer and $400 from a name brand?
@bussi785926 күн бұрын
Check your math concerning the value of the inductance of a short coil in relation to the number of turns, as a ham radio operator you really should know this.